Yesterday, we got to see the first promotional image of Angelina Jolie in character as Maleficent – go here to see. I loved the gorgeous, scary, dark, sinister, beautiful image that they chose, and I think it bodes well for the film. Plus, who doesn’t love to see a woman rocking some horns? With that in mind, here are some brand new photos of Angelina filming in an English countryside today – note all of the cows. Was Maleficent’s first gig as a cattle rancher or something? “Maleficent: Texas Ranger”. So many questions.
CB was surprised by how BIG Angelina’s horns are. Once again, I think it bodes well – Maleficent is known for her elaborate horned headpieces, and it’s cool that they’re sticking so close to the character. As for the rest of the costume… brown sacks!!! Brown capes. Brown cloaks. I told you so. This film is going to be full of sacks and cloaks and capes and MAGNIFICENT HORNS. I wish I could wear horns in my daily life.
Can these paparazzi jags get a decent telephoto lens or what?
Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.
Do not like. I kinda like that staff thingy though. But that’s about it.
Also, are her ears pointed? If so, why?! o_O
Where’s her peaked wimple?! They really should’ve gone CGI on this one. Plus, I’ll bet they have her doing the fake English accent she can’t do. Disappointed by these pics.
It looks like she’s picking out a boyfriend amongst the bulls.
With all those bulls, she better be careful where she steps! Even a superstar can get poopy-foot!:)
Wow it really looks cheap and budget as hell!
Oh I would highly doubt that given the budget for this movie, and the fact that Disney is finally coming to terms with one of their biggest, baddest villains of all time, this will be any cheap production.
I just love those movies that have the feel of Fables and Mythology.
It has been quite some time since a good Fantasy movie has been produced. I just remember when I was very young and my parents did not allow me to watch Excalibur, but I still sneaked a few peaks…
And that hand coming out of a lake, with the fog and the dramatic music, still gives me chills!
I believe this will be anything but budget — unless they pull a “Green Lantern” with it.
After the final treatment, these movies always look completely different than what we see in “on set” pictures.
Plus, these were taken by a paparazzi — from far far away (heee!), not an official photographer (those production stills).
P.S.: My only fear is that by the time the movie finally opens, we’ll have seen so many posts about it, that there won’t be anything left to be seen in the theaters (plot-wise, I mean).
Ah yes, the Lady of the Lake!
+10 for the Excalibur reference, Maguita.
The movie still holds up because the actors in it are excellent (Helen Mirren, Nicol Williamson, Liam Neeson, Patrick Stewart, etc).
I first saw it when I was a child, too, while the adults were distracted. Snuck a peek at the love scene with the man wearing armor. WTF! How was that possible and/or comfortable? Lucky for me, it didn’t warp my innocent mind. 🙂
Excalibur was where I first heard Carmina Burana. Great memories.
OMG, +30 for the Carmina Burana reference. That was where I heard it for the first time too!
And that armor and the switcheroo sex scene… I did not understand at all, but it was hot.
Excellent cast, feel like I need to watch the movie completely for the first time… Without any parental remonstrance.
Hope this Maleficent lives up to the hype… Although there will be no sex, because you know… It’s Disney, and sex happens only behind the scenes.
+20 for you! There, now we’re even.
That sex scene was, um, compelling, but I remember feeling sorry for the woman. Ouch!
I got away with seeing it because we were at a party and all the adults were busy chatting away. The hosts had cable and they left it on, so naturally us curious children gravitated to the TV. Parental supervision fail, LOL!
Disney sex equals 2 characters looking at each other meaningfully and then a brief kiss. Wouldn’t want to upset the parents. God forbid they should have a small teaching moment with their kiddies about the birds and the bees.
Anyway, I think Maleficent will turn out well. AJ’s good movies outnumber the bad, I think(?) Crossing my fingers.
WOW, from ONE picture you can tell that it’s “cheap and budget”?
No, it looks cheap from the 7 pictures they’ve posted. One hopes the movie looks a LOT better than this. Why would they put her in anything brown – Maleficent wears black and purple only.
@Gg : I think this is how they are going to show maleficent at the beginning, when she’s not the most coldest, evil fairy! 😉 Later on, I’m sure she would wear black and purple color. 🙂
Rhea – hm interesting idea – maybe so. Have been waiting to see this film since they announced it over a year ago. Gonna have a long wait looks like.
@Gg: I’m curious to see how they would paint Maleficent in the beginning. But yes, I can’t wait to see her in all Maleficent evilness/gloriousness soon!!! 😀 Or….maybe better not. Perhaps waiting until they release the trailer is better. I don’t want too many spoiler alert!!! 🙂
One grainy photo of Angie out in a field somewhere? But you can tell that the movie set is cheap. I doubt it since its been reported that the production cost alone is $110 mil for the movie.
Ok haters.
yes and when the movie starts making money they’ll inflate the budget so that it’ll be considered a flop like they tried with her other movies….So predictable.
The so called major flop the tourist rings bells…considerig most (if not all?) of Depp’s films, including the high budget Tim Burton Dark Shadows, from before to after the tourist, have been flops, while Salt was hugely successful….
Guess who pulled in the audience for The Tourist?
YAY!!! Pointy ears!!!
And yeah, I love me some horns too.
That’s why Hiddleston started growing on me…he rocks those Loki’s horns.
+1 about the Loki horns and when did horns go out of style? 😉
and the I think those are highland cattle maybe? Looks like it might be an elf priestess of some sort. Showing potential for a very interesting movie.
Yes those are Highland “coos”. They are so cute, I love them. They remind me of huge sheepdogs with funny ears.
Cool! But yeesh, her cheekbones really look like that! I’d thought it was lighting, make-up or photoshop when I saw that first photo yesterday.
I think yesterday really was a combine between a make up and prosthetics cheeks. But today, it looks like only prosthetics cheeks.
Looks like both.
This reminds me how computer graphics/ photoshop etc really play a big big part in all movies now …. I am sure it will look totally different in the final version but I have seen costumes from conventions that look better than this … and this is from a high budget movie set?
Is that makeup that is making her cheeks look like that or are there prosthesis attached to her face? It’s freaking me out.
It looks like prosthetic pieces to me.
Definitely prosthetic. Just like Gaga’s Born This Way makeup!
So horns are supposed to be real in this version? Not a headpiece? Looks that way. Also she has pointy ears. Interesting.
Why would she wear some beautiful dress walking in a field of cows..
She is wearing a perfect costume for where she is. And besides I think these are early scenes. Before she became the “EVIL” one. Elle is not even in UK at this time. So makes sense to me.
I love that she works with the same people. The man doing her hair and the woman doing her makeup work with on most of her films. I think the woman also worked with Brad.
How anyone says it looks budget when they are OUTSIDE for goodness sake. If you can do an outside scene outside why would you make a set for what you get free.
She looks like she is having a good time. Glad for her. I miss her on the Big screen. It has been too too long.
so maleficent is like… er… little bo peep in her past life?
or is maleficent some kind of an equivalent to hathor (the cow goddess of the ancient egyptians?)
and seems like they have a hard time not laughing, i can’t blame them. i was grinning scrolling all the way down.
Exactly, her appearance does have something religious.
I want her standing on a mountain with lot’s of stone plates and even more “Thou shalt not eat cheeeeeseburgers, as they shalt turn you fat” screaming.
Moses!Jolie is full of win.
Thou shalt not eat cheeseburgers, not because they are fattening, but because they might be thine brother.
Whats with hollywood and old fairy Disney stories. charlize, roberts and now angelina..
Well the horns look cheap to my eyes, might be the bad qualtiy of the fotos. Anyway, looks like cgi movie. might be good.
Scientology can go away – here comes Angie with her magnificent bullhorns – billions of heathen and John Travoltas feel the urge to submiss to her.
Worship the cow queen ! Membership $20 monthly fee.
Thanks Ming —
My brain is easily imprinted. From this moment, Angelina = Cow Queen.
😀
So did Meleficent heard cattle before her transition into evil doing? I don’t remember that part in the Disney version. .
Disney did not write the fairy tales!! They ‘imagined’ the costumes and scenery too.
Jeesh people let go of the Disney and enjoy [or not] whatever this turns out to be.
There are probably some lovesick steer out there.
Her evil queen won’t be nearly as good as Charlize Theron’s… in Young Adult. 🙂 I liked Theron in SWATH (she was the ONLY redeeming factor) but lady was FIERCE as hell in Young Adult and portrayed the most unlikable character since Jack Nicholson in The Shining.
But of course, Kaiser roots for Jolie and slams Theron every chance she gets. I heart you Kaiser, but too much bias at play. Anyway, I’m excited to see Elle Fanning and Leslie Manville in this. Oh and Juno Temple!
Well considering one is about Snow White and other is about Sleeping Beauty.
Unfortunately, others didn’t agree how great CT is since it still hasn’t grossed its production cost back ($170 mil).
Since when has box office been the sole indicator of quality? Do you know how many great films have had lackluster BO returns? That’s an illogical argument to make.
I loved Charlize in Young Adult I haven’t seen Snow White but I bet she’s amazing (same with Prometheus)….I really don’t see what that has to do with Angelina.
Some of us like more than one actress
Ya know what I’m sayin?
Maleficent was a fairy if I am remembering the Disney film correctly, it has been a long time since I saw it. And fairies live in the woods and would tend their livestock and such in many fairy tales. Angelina’s look is very much like the Disney character to me.
This is a big budget film, the paps are kept far away by security from this location in a park in the UK, and the fuzzy pap pics were taken with extremely long lens.
Read they have already been filming since June 13th, these are the first outside scenes, as there are sets at Pinewood Studio.
Looking forward to seeing this interesting sounding film with its great cast when it is released.
Rena-Fairies in mythology do not ‘tend to livestock’.
I’ve never read a story that had a fairy farmer. They make mischief among humans.
I think they’ve made her into an elf, considering the pointed ears which is weird because in the cartoon Disney film she’s an evil fairy. Maybe they thought rounded ears would be too human?
Fairies in most, if not all, live action films are ‘imagined’ with pointy ears. It’s become the standard.
i wish someone would come up with a different look like they have done with Vampires.
LAK: Me too. There is so much you could do in regard to fairies since they don’t have a set way of looking-they could have covered her ears with her hair, given her big ears, small ears, pronged ears, flaming ears, ears that look like leaves, ears that are organically incorporated into the horns or no ears at all…
Maleficent obviously has a very specific look and her ears were covered in the cartoon. I suspect they did that to help with keeping the lines of her face sharp and stylized.
I feel like they could have been more creative with her ear look instead of just reverting to the boring Spock/elf ears. It’s like an afterthought.
They have the hood that covers her ears but then they remembered-oops, we’ve got a whole section of the film where she isn’t evil so we need to do something with her ears. Let’s do something that reads “fairy”-pointy ears!
i wonder if it’s going to be like a rapunzel-esque beginning to sleeping beauty.
the queen is expecting a child, and is craving a cow, but not just any cow. it must be the cow goddess’s cow. so the king and his knights stole maleficent’s biggest cow and made a steak so the queen can eat it.
maleficent caught wind of the bbq and was angry and declared that the newborn kid must be handed over to her as repayment. but not only was she not invited to the christening, the queen/king forgot about their craving-driven promise. so maleficent had a cow and cursed the whole kingdom.
then the environmentalists found out that her cows had been churning out enough methane to punch a whole in the ozone and picketed her mercilessly. she had no choice but to transform all her cows into one methane-breathing dragon and barricaded herself in her castle with barbed wire and thorns.
one hundred years later, sleeping beauty woke up because global warming meant it is too hot to sleep comfortably.
etc etc.
What? She slept for a hundred years? The lazy cow.
[Sorry, sorry, can’t help it]
People are so pathetic in their eagerness to hate on all things Angelina….I can’t wait to see the final product. Judging from the quality of the cast and people behind this its going to be a good one.
Dont be ridiculous. We snark on absolutely everyone, why dont you take a look at the comments on all the other articles today. Its called Celeb bitchy for a reason, ya know.
Besides, I’ve seen your comments on other celebrities over the past months that I have been on CB and girl, you are NOT the kindest of commenters. So lets quit the hypocrisy already, there are NO SACRED COWS (pun intended) in celebrity gossip.
Mega Co-sign. Everybody is fair game. Just because you have thing for Jolie, doesnt mean shes got immunity. I have a thing for Beyonce but I let people have their say even when I disagree.
Now on to Jolie. I feel this is both very copy cat and competitive of her. Between Julia Roberts and Charlize Theron you would think she would avoid this kind of role for atleast 2 years. The comparisons are inevitable and she knows it. Its like releasing 3 meteor movies in quick succession, fans are forced to pick sides (as seen on this comments with people already deriding Charlize for no other reason other than Jolie is now in the mix). She is truly a divisive witch.
And don’t forget comparing a movie that has just started production to Charlize’s movie, and of course AJ comes off worse.
I think Jolie is stretching into comedy. She is playing uber campy. Jolie has described it as a Disney film that will explain why a female creature who curses a baby and carries out the curse 16 years later is such a role model for little girls.
per usual you take her statement out of context. If you read it she was saying that even the villain can have qualities that are positive. There is a reason Maleficent is some peoples favorite of the Disney Villains. And a reason some people want to see it.
Angie didn’t curse a baby and carry out a hate for 16 years. YOU DO REALIZE THIS IS A MOVIE.. NOT REAL LIFE. I think young children have it more together then you. They understand the difference.
and she is playing it “campy” how the heck do you know that from a picture. Have you had the opportunity to see the scene before anyone else.
I think people like Maleficent because of the original character design, her original voice/characterization (Eleanor Audley) and the fact that she is a purely evil character.
I don’t understand how they are going to make her have positive characteristics nor why they would want to. There is nothing wrong with a fairy creature being born evil. There have always been evil fairies and good fairies in mythology…why Disney feels the need to put humanity into a supernatural creature is beyond me.
GrandPoobah – for the same reason we have an anti-hero hero in the movies these days. people can’t sit through a film these days that simply presents a villain who is simply that, enjoys it and doesn’t apologise for it!!! It’s annoying.
I enjoy cartoon villians ie the ones you find in animation because it’s the only medium where they are allowed to be proper villains.
It’s a frightening idea for some people to come to terms with the fact that some people are just born evil (see: We need to talk about Kevin and Swinton’s excellent quotes about it).
I also didn’t like Jolie (the studio) trying to make Maleficent “soft”. Let her be the female Joker :).
Weren’t you crowing a couple weeks ago that there was no cast because no one wanted to work with AJ? So that was proved wrong, so now you’re changing your tact. Isn’t it exhausting to hate this much?
I’m telling you, all that negative energy could power up a generator.
Maleficent was my favorite villian as a child. She scared the hell out of me. So I’ve been anxious about the movie (in a good way) since hearing about Jolie’s portrayal. But these first shots make me nervous. The horns are indeed magnificent. But the costume is…underwhelming, as is the cow pasture.
She’s tending steer in a pasture, what on earth would she be wearing?
Hmm, it does look a bit cheap, but I’m sure it won’t look terrible after post-production.
It’s not hateful to Jolie to simply point out that a costume looks budget, nor was it to Julia Roberts when people ripped apart the production stills from Mirror Mirror.
I don’t get why her fans are always so zealously defensive. The costume looks pretty crappy considering all the money being thrown at this movie. Deal with it.
How does it look cheap? She is tending steer in a pasture, and these photos are taken by paparazzi from a far distance – how can you tell what looks cheap or not?
Besides, they don’t shoot movies and then put them in theatres immediately. They shoot and then do a lot of post production. I mean, if you look at pictures of the new Superman movie, Superman’s costume looks cheap as heck, but it won’t on screen. That’s just how costumes tend look.
Yeah I thought it was just me that didn’t get how people were deciding the sack clothes looked cheap. I definitely don’t get what they’re supposed to look like.
“How does it look cheap?”
You’re kidding right? You yourself wrote “Costumes tend to look cheap when you see the actors walking around on set.”
I also said that it wouldn’t look like that after post-production. People are allowed to be critical on a gossip site, you guys really need to calm down, gain some objectivity, and stop being so damn defensive.
@Tiegs: I wasn’t saying that her costume looks cheap, although I do see that I wrote my comment in a way that made it seem like that’s what I meant.
I will refine my comment, and explain what I mean.
Angelina and her costume were photographed from far away, and the pictures are grainy. How can you tell if her costume is cheap or not? She is dressed as a shepherdess and standing in a field with steer. If she is dressed as a shepherdess, her clothes aren’t supposed to look expensive, are they? No, they aren’t.
Also, if most movie costumes look cheap, and that’s what her costume looks like, then her costume isn’t cheap and it doesn’t look cheap – it looks exactly the way movie costumes should look.
This website may be about snark, but I like to point out silly thinking when I get the chance. When it comes down to it, I guess I’m being critical towards you, which, like you said, is in keeping with the theme of the site.
Special effects added laters.. this is bare bones.. looking good Angie..
Yesterday’s picture was gorgeous. It may be the long lens but she kind of looks like Tim the Enchanter from Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Which is awesome in its own way but probably not the look they were going for.
ha ha ha!! Tim? You are right. She totally resembles him here. Oh how I love Monty Python.
Look at the bones!
(Eve — quick, we’re having another Python moment!!)
😀
Awww, I missed this one!
distracted by the scottish highland cattle in the background, so shaggy and cute!
Hopefully, that brown icky colour is not the real colour of that outfit. Like, maybe they put that on her to throw us off? ‘Cause it doesn’t match the colour of the horns at all. And yeah, sacks, sacks, sacks.
On the other hand, I also think her horns are magnificent and I love that she seems to be enjoying herself so much on that shoot! Look at how she’s smiling! I can’t wait to see the movie!
I like it. I think this is before maleficent starts clothing her horns. 😉 The all black clothed horns comes when she is truly evil. Can’t wait to see this.
Me too! 🙂
get her a cheeseburger or five while they are out there – too skinny!
Even with horns, she’s still gorgeous!
This is what she looks like before makeup!
Yesterdays picture was amazing.
Today’s pictures remind me of what happened when the pictures of Anne Hathaway as Catwoman came out.
I’m sorry but she looks ridiculous.
The horns are okay, it’s the rest of – everything thats disappointing. Also can we please stop explaining/justiyint female villains? Part of what males them so cool is they need no explanation. Attaching a sob story is just a way to excuse a woman being powerful and bitchy.
She is tending steer in a pasture; she’s not going to look glamorous – she’s not supposed to. How is it that so many people don’t understand this?
Costumes tend to look cheap when you see the actors walking around on set. That’s just how most things look before post production or when they’re not being shot by the cameras shooting the actual movie.
I’m in Chipotle trying not to LOL at Maleficent: Texas Ranger. And I’m in Texas. Lol
Well, Angie looks like she’s having fun in the cowpats. That’s all that matters.
The promotional image was cool, but I don’t like these pix at all. She looks more like Brunnhilde than Maleficent.
Anyone who shows up for work in the morning and is told that they will be working with a herd of highland coos has my deepest sympathies. They are ornery SOBs, and right now, the calves are out, you can double the ornery. The horns will probably rock once post-production has taken over.
I cannot wrap my head around Angie’s angular face. She has had as much plastic surgery as Madonna if not more. Her cheek bone and chin implants are astounding. And don’t tell me it’s from weight loss….it’s not. She has always been extremely thin and had a round face. It’s all plastic surgery. Major nose streamlining too.
As a matter of fact, the fabulous horns remind me of her implants. Spectacular as can be.
You know the cheeks are actually prosthetics done by make-up RIGHT????
*backs away very slowly*
Oh my, I’m really embarrassed for you. You took all that time to post about something that is not even real. You are going on and on about makeup for a film.
It is mind blowing that you really need to believe that Angie is beautiful because of surgery. When looking at pictures of her over the years shows she is and has always been a beautiful woman.
But keep talking about the prosthetic make up for the movie.. WHICH IS NOT HER FACE.
ROTFLMAO AT YOU .
LOL They are prosthetics. How embarrassing…
Anyway, have you seen photos of her when she’s little? She looks exactly the same except with more wrinkles, naturally. I don’t know why Angie haters insist on thinking her beauty is manufactured when there is evidence on the internet that she was born beautiful. I guess it’s a compliment though that you think she’s so incredibly stunning that it must be manufactured 🙂
I seriously cannot believe you think that Jolie had surgery to look like this for Maleficent….and she also added a bump to her nose because bumpy noses have always been considered pretty in our culture…?
Jolie’s uber-angular facial features in these photos must surely be a result of prosthetics.
But perhaps what Luise meant to express is the fact (yes, it is a FACT for many with experience working in the filmmaking industry) that Angelina, like most of her other high-profile female Hollywood A-listers, has had quite a few nips and tweaks performed over the years. The procedures have inarguably produced elegant changes that have only enhanced her already pretty features, but the seeming facial “perfection” she is touted for is not all natural — nor is it the result of age, weight loss, lighting, etc. Celebs of her caliber rarely if ever admit to having had work done because it DESTROYS the illusion that has played such a huge role in “making” so many of their careers.
I enjoy Celebitchy on occasion and like hearing what people have to say. I never comment, though, and am certainly NOT a Jolie “hater.” I realize people will always have the right to their own opinions, and everyone is entitled to believe what he/she would like to believe. I will likely also be burned at the stake for this comment, as it seems many are just as quick to defend Jolie as they are to rip her to shreds. But I felt the need to add my voice to this particular conversation because the idealization of Jolie (or of any other celebrity, for that matter) is alarmingly grounded in propaganda that has somehow just about erased the lines separating fabrication from truth.
My opinion makes no difference in the greater scheme of things, but I still sometimes wish people would wake up and be more cognizant of how much smoke Hollywood blows up all of our arses.
You’re a pathetic moron Luise. hahahaha Wow! Want a spatula to scrape the egg off your face? hahaha
Wow good job to all you movie experts who can tell how much something costs by looking at poorly take pictures of it. I think it’s ridiculous to think that 1) This movie will be anywhere near to cheap 2) you can make an accurate assessment on the quality of the film based on these photos 3) the title character of this film would walk around in plain brown robes the whole film. Disney knows what maleficient looks like. They made the movie, pretty sure they are aware of what her traditional costume is. That’s just a guess though.
Thank you!
It is mind-boggling just how many people here don’t understand that these photos are taken from far away and are of poor quality, costumes tend to look a little cheap when the actors/actresses are just walking around on set, and most of all, that she is tending steer in a pasture and, therefore, will not be glammed out and wearing leather or whatever the heck they think she should be wearing. Have they never heard of post-production?
Oh, and how is it that they saw a close up of her face with the prosthetic cheeks yesterday, yet can’t grasp that she is also wearing them in these pictures?
It’s almost frightening how little they are actually paying attention to these simple details.
I like the horns in these shots.I’m excited about this movie,have been since it was first mentioned.Edit: I didn’t realize her horns were covered in the first released pic.I thought those were going to the horns.Whew..she’ll have actual horns in the movie.And Jolie does sexy bad the best!!
Ok, I know this may sound like a dumb question, but why is that black car in the background so HUGE? It cant be part of the scene. Its dimensions are throwing me off! Other then that, yeah, the movie looks like it’ll be fine.
I don’t think it’s really that huge. It looks like a 5-8 seat SUV that is used to transport the cast and crew.
lmao!!! This looks so cheap. She has nothing on goddess Charlize. The true badass queen. Charlize looked regal. Angelina looks budget.
That’s because Charlize Theron is insanely beautiful, so of course she looks amazing in everything.
That aside, her costume in SWATH looked overly done, while Jolie’s looks appropriate for being outside with dirty cows.
You know nothing about either of these two fairytales do you? The queen Charlize played was REGAL. Maleficent is an actual true evil fairy bitch, she’s supposed to be scary and intimidating not a pretty delicate princess. It’s unfathomable to me that so many are saying this looks low budget because of some grainy photos. This is DISNEY for god’s sake not some no name production company. The only pictures we saw of Charlize was post-production… Can we all think for one second instead of rabidly hating on everything attached to Angelina?
Exactly, Emma. I couldn’t have said it any better myself.
Is she smoking in the very last pic? There is something between her index and middle finger and she’s holding it like a cigarette.
Thought she hated smoking?
i think it’s a yellow-ring-thing on her pointer/middle finger. it’s like a big clawlike protrusion (i think).
i try to look at it more closely in the fourth pic from the top where she’s laughing and resting her hands on the top of the shepherding stick thing.
but it’s very grainy, i’m not sure. it looks cylindrical/pyramidal/or something.
speaking of smoking, i don’t know whether she hates it or not, but i seem to remember laineygossip.com mentioning she and brad pitt were smoking on a balcony after an award ceremony. either the oscars or the golden globes. i don’t remember the exact details. i’ll try to find it. but i’m pretty sure it’s this year.
Not thrilled about Jolie playing Maleficent. Her performances just never do anything for me.
Love all of Angelina’s movies and can’t wait to see this! I’m sure this costume will fit into the plot and make sense. She’s perfect for Maleficent. I’ve always been kind of the opposite, Charlize bores me and Angelina intrigues me lol. But love them both, at least they’re both are talented.
omg pointy ears and horny angelina
perfectttt