Chelsea Handler: ‘I can’t just throw my name on something & hope everybody gets it’

Chelsea Handler covers the new issue of something called “Marie Claire @ Work”. I guess the magazine is trying to differentiate between the “normal” celebrity profile and the profile of a working woman, with a focus on her business stuff. I guess Chelsea is a good enough choice for that kind of profile – she’s developed a lucrative brand for herself, and she has a devoted fanbase of women who seem to enjoy her. But… you know how I feel about her. I think she’s awful. So I found this whole Marie Claire piece to be too cute by half, especially when they approach her by saying that Chelsea attracts, “smart, young, ambitious women hungry for a witty straight shooter who tells it like it is–minus Leno’s yuk-yuks, Letterman’s smugness, and Jon Stewart’s smarty-pants editorializing. Handler has made a lucrative career as the best friend you’re desperate to have- gorgeous but not intimidating, always game for a night out, and loyal to the death, as evidenced by her numerous on-the-record critiques of Angelina Jolie, bête noire of her good pal Jennifer Aniston.” Gross. False. Upsetting.

Handler likes to drink: “I went out with a guy who once told me I didn’t need to drink to make myself more fun to be around,” she joked. “I told him, ‘I’m drinking so that you’re more fun to be around.'”

On the cancellation of “her ratings-challenged, critically panned NBC sitcom Are You There, Chelsea?”: “Obviously I care about anything I do, but this was more of a pain in the ass after a while. Creatively, it was a really good lesson, and I knew I was due for one… I can’t just throw my name on something and hope everybody gets it. Everything I’ve done has been really fortuitous, but you don’t learn a lot when everything’s easy all the time.”

On boyfriend Andre Balazs: “I’m definitely worried about maintaining my relevance and not wanting to go too far out of bounds to accommodate someone else”

On Joan Rivers saying that Chelsea “made it on her back, f–king” then-head of E! Ted Harbert: “I so didn’t, and I so don’t care about you asking about it…I would come home from work, and Ted would be like, ‘Do you want to watch your show?’ and I’d be like, ‘No, I just came from my show. That’s the last thing I’d want to do.’ That was the reason it didn’t work out, ultimately. I think.”

Her career: “I don’t like to be that aggressive or ambitious,” she says. “I know it doesn’t seem like that, but I don’t feel like, ‘Oh God, I’ve got to do this, I’ve got to do that.’ I have severe ADD, and I’m constantly looking to amuse myself.”

Cheslea “is careful about alienating fans with gratuitous licensing deals”: No fragrances, she insists, and on the heels of This Means War, in which she costarred with buddy Reese Witherspoon, no more supporting roles.

She wants to tackle more serious topics on Chelsea Lately: “There was a period of time when I started getting antsy and was like, ‘Ugh, I can’t sit here and gossip anymore,'” she says. “I want to talk more about politics and human-interest stories, like when somebody shoots somebody else at a drive-through over Chicken McNuggets–stupid stuff like that.”

What she’ll do after her contract (which goes to 2014) is up: “I’m not a network kind of girl … There’s no long-term goal. I just know I’m on a contract for two years and in the interim I’m gonna do whatever I can to make that as fruitful as possible, and try and get as much success as I can for the people around me.”

[From Marie Claire]

I found Chelsea’s response to the question about Are You There, Chelsea? cancellation question very interesting. Her first response “Obviously I care about anything I do, but this was more of a pain in the ass after a while” – is fascinating. Is she saying that making her particular brand of humor fit into network television was a “pain in the ass” or that dealing with the mountain of criticism was a pain in the ass? But the second part is better – “Creatively, it was a really good lesson, and I knew I was due for one… I can’t just throw my name on something and hope everybody gets it. Everything I’ve done has been really fortuitous, but you don’t learn a lot when everything’s easy all the time.” Yeah… because nobody “got it” with that show, it was so awful. And I’m really pleased that Chelsea isn’t going to be doing any more movies. YAY!

Photos courtesy of Marie Claire.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

37 Responses to “Chelsea Handler: ‘I can’t just throw my name on something & hope everybody gets it’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. idk says:

    She’s sort of hit and miss. Sometimes she’s really funny on her show, but other times she’s NOT. She has had other celebrities host her show while she was on vacation, etc. and they do a better job i.e. Ross Mathews and Kevin Hart. I do think it’s great she is successful, but wow she is grossly over-paid, but then again so is everyone else in Hollywood.

  2. Guesto says:

    “…gorgeous but not intimidating…”

    Ok, who are they talking about again?

    • Rachel says:

      I also got a laugh out of the parenthetical (& she’s got great hair!).

      Are we looking at the same woman??? Girl, get your roots done!

  3. DeltaJuliet says:

    She’s gorgeous? Did I miss something somewhere? Maybe it’s just her personality bleeding through but I can’t find anything attractive or appealing about this broad.

  4. Rux says:

    I’m sorry, I know how you feel about her, but I really like her. I do. I think she is very funny and I watch her show every night. She really does say what is on her mind. And no subject is “off limits” when it comes to her. She will answer honestly what you ask her.

    The interview she did with the Situation was by far my favorite. She was able to poke fun at him without being an a-hole or kissing his ass. But like you said, everybody has their own taste. However, her show was awful and it did not work and I did not get it.

  5. Mimi says:

    “…when somebody shoots somebody else at a drive-through over Chicken McNuggets–stupid stuff like that.”
    Why does comment annoy the crap out of me? Wouldn’t that be considered more “tragic stuff”, you stupid cow?

  6. Mimi says:

    Sorry, stupid stuff double post. 🙂

    • Genevieve says:

      I agree with most of the comments here. Chelsea Handler may be funny, but she very reductive of tragic events, which annoys the p*ss out of me.

      I understand that this is her particular brand of comedy….I do “get” it.

      I just don’t happen to appreciate it. IMO, she comes of as brash and utterly classless- MOST of the time.

  7. lassie says:

    The vibe I always get from her is that she thinks she is too cool and good to do what she is doing, which is essentially an F list talk show host. She’ll never be in the league with the big boys (LenoLetterman) or even the next tier, (FallonKimmelConan) and can’t even touch the minivan majority’s favs of Ellen or Oprah (now, not 3 years ago). She books somewhat known talent and talks down to them.

    Also, she’s starting to look Lohanish after all the drunken slutting she’s done.

  8. RHONYC says:

    “…I have severe ADD, and I’m constantly looking to amuse myself.”

    thank gaaaud, i’m not the only one. 😆

  9. a says:

    I think we should be concerned. She only said no more supporting roles. I hope that doesn’t mean she thinks she should star!!!! She’s absolutely awful and her humor (?) is a lot like a sixth grader who just tried out swearing and dirty jokes. Powerful, smart and beautiful to whom?

  10. AprilLadyBird83 says:

    She’s kind of awful and I don’t get why people like her. I’ve watched the show but its not funny to me.

  11. Kelly says:

    Unfortunately, she said no more SUPPORTING roles. Sounds to me like she wants starring roles now, like her good buddy Jen.

    • pwal says:

      That’s how I read it too.

      Seriously, Hollywood…
      If you have that much money to whiz away on this talent-free, looks-free, charisma-free hellhound, why not just hand out $50s to randoms on a street corner (preferably, in Michigan… I’m a bit light right now).

  12. hoya_chick says:

    I fancy my self as a “smart, young, ambitious woman” and I don’t watch her show or think she is funny. I was pretty neutral about her until she got on stage and called another woman a C word and trashed her children and their ethnicity. That’s a no go in my book.

    She’s gross and not funny and that’s why no one watched her sitcom. Joan was right, if it wasn’t for her relationship she would have never gotten a show on E.

    Oh and what does this mean “I’m definitely worried about maintaining my relevance and not wanting to go too far out of bounds to accommodate someone else.” Her answers don’t address the topic/question. She is trying to sound smart but comes off as making absolutely no sense.

  13. Eve says:

    gorgeous but not intimidating

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Oh, my…*wipes tears*

    She’s neither!

  14. Apple says:

    Chelsea helps other comics shine she isn’t old school Roseanne or Rivers where the spotlight is always on them.

    I wouldn’t know about TJ Miller, Whitney Cummings, Chris Franjola, Sarah Colona or Jen Kirkman if it wasn’t for the roundtable setting. We have Whitney with her shows(give “Whitney” a chance its funny)now Jen and Sarah are coming up with network sitcoms because of the exposure Chelsea gave them.

    I do agree her sitcom was god awful, bad casting and according to Chelsea the network wanted to turn her book into a sitcom and Chelsea didn’t want to have anything to do with it but show up say some lines and leave. You can’t just be an Oprah and think a network is going to work just by showing up. Either you don’t do it or your all in creatively.

  15. Ashling says:

    She has always seemed like a functioning crackie to me. I find her incredibly gross. Her voice gives me a migraine.

  16. garvels says:

    Ugh…can’t stand this woman and her cheap,adolescent,locker room humor.

  17. ramie says:

    I like her & I think she’s hilarious. I would definitely have her as a friend.

  18. barb says:

    She has ADD……that makes sense, since peeps with ADD tend to be extremely quick and witty.

  19. Christian says:

    Her stand up/monologue stuff is awful but she is quite good at interviews. She gets just about anyone (ex: SMG) to open up and relax. I guess it’s because talking to her is like talking to some drunk chick at a party.

  20. Hubbahun says:

    They dissed Jon Stewart…*locks and loads* 😛

  21. TheOriginalMaxi says:

    I love her books, and I use to love her on the Girls Behaving Badly and her show in the beginning. Then she got all popular and douchey..

  22. Lindsey says:

    “Gorgeous but not intimidating,”

    … but that means not gorgeous.

  23. Celt Lady says:

    I am not even sure that the author of the article met her subject. Gorgeous? Ummm, no…..raggedy most of the time. Loyal? Seems like she is abusive to some of the regulars on her round table. You would think her
    loyalty would extend to her regulars. Guess not. I stopped watching because she is nasty, rude and no longer funny most of the time. Very full of herself.

  24. RN says:

    I have no doubt that she was a mean girl in high school. She’s built a career on just being mean and drunk. She’s not funny AT ALL. Her book was unreadable. She’s like Liz Phair to me, who’s made a career out of talking over music and posing with her mouth open – nothing of substance or value.

  25. Ryan says:

    Her hair is awful, and being a bitch doesn’t make someone funny. It just makes them a bitch.

  26. Janet says:

    She’s tore up from the floor up and she’s an evil bitch into the bargain. Dreadful combo.

  27. Stacia says:

    Just like me…most people on this site CAN”T STAND THIS WOMAN OR HER SHOW!!!!

    Never thought a woman can be a DOUCHEBAG but …..

  28. lisa2 says:

    This is why there should be a law against using the word Gorgeous any time you feel like it.

    wrong wrong wrong.. too many women are called Gorgeous and Heaven knows they are not.

    OH.. and I can’t stand this HAG.. yep HAG

  29. Nico says:

    Dafuq does “smarty-pants editorializing” even mean??!

  30. jwoolman says:

    I like her. She’s a comedian, and it’s normal for them to be hated as well as loved. Humor is very individual. Lots of good comedians make me cringe, doesn’t mean they’re not good at what they do. It’s also normal for comedians to be hit or miss and to sometimes miss hard. The good ones take risks and sometimes it just doesn’t work. I do think the fact that she’s female is a factor- a guy could get away with a lot she gets blasted for. It’s hard to get past the nurturing female mindset, even if you’re female yourself and think you’re above such stereotypes. Chelsea really doesn’t fit into any standard box, though.

  31. jwoolman says:

    About her looks- I love that she doesn’t get done up fancy. She looks best just with her hair tied back, which she often does. In one interview, she put on something that messed up her hair and she just continued on with the interview, with part of her hair sticking up. She was aware of it but didn’t care. She’s actually a good looking woman despite too much alcohol, she just looks more natural than we’re used to seeing on tv and isn’t afraid to laugh at her own features.

  32. poppy says:

    another stephen huvane monstrosity. no surprise her only friends are his clients as well.

  33. Excellent blog here! Also your web site quite a bit up very fast! What host are you using? Can I am getting your associate link in your host? I desire my website loaded up as quickly as yours lol