Ben Affleck signed a multi-picture deal for Batman and has a say in the script


Following the announcement that Ben Affleck will play Batman, fans went through the stages of grief. People didn’t want to believe it, then they got pissed off, and now they seem to be coming to terms with it. While Affleck may be a talented director with solid acting skill, many people believe that he lacks the nuance to nail the character. We’ll have to wait to see. It turns out that Affleck may have more than just a single movie in which to impress us. He’s said to have signed a multi-picture deal and to have worked out an arrangement where he has script approval. He’s business savvy that’s for sure.

Snyder approached Affleck months ago, reports THR. Affleck would not take on this role unless he had some say in how this script turns out. He will have a strong hand at Warner Bros., which backed him on “The Town” and the Oscar-winning “Argo” and is invested in telling the town he’s sticking around the studio. Affleck signed for multiple pictures. If this works out he’ll have a major franchise to play with for years ahead. And a major studio where he can hang his hat, as his hero Clint Eastwood has done for decades.

Affleck tends to do better as an actor in his own pictures–which are often smarter than average studio fare. He shared a screenwriting Oscar with Matt Damon, after all, for “Good Will Hunting.” The irony: Affleck turned down directing “Man of Steel.” And did fine as George Reeves, TV’s Superman, in little-seen “Hollywoodland.” The LAT looks at which of his past roles prepared him for this one.

He can do this. Fans are reportedly 70% against this casting, but they opposed Michael Keaton and Robert Downey, Jr. initially, too, as Batman and Iron Man, respectively. Joss Whedon, the EW cover man and Marvel’s “The Avengers” writer-director, gives trending #Batfleck a thumbs up. While Affleck is still on board to star in David Fincher’s “Gone Girl” opposite Rosamund Pike (“The World’s End”), he’s letting go of the remake of Guillaume Canet’s “Tell No One” (based on Harlen Coben’s book) and his adaptation of Stephen King tome “The Stand.” (“Crazy Heart” writer-director Scott Cooper is picking up the rewrite.) Affleck is hanging onto his plans to direct Dennis Lehane’s “Live By Night” at Warners.

[From IndieWire via Reddit]

So Affleck cleared up his schedule so he could play Batman in several movies. I like Affleck in his own films but it’s hard for me to see how his Batman won’t be wooden. Whatever his plans are, he wants to make bank from this franchise. You can’t blame him for that. I just thought he was going in a different direction with his career. He’s laughing all the way to the bank.

Meanwhile there’s a new casting rumor that the venerable Bryan Cranston is going to be Lex Luthor. It sounds fan-invented and based on his excellent Breaking Bad character, but it could be true. Remember that Cranston worked with Affleck in Argo. If Affleck has a lot of script control, it’s not far-fetched to think he would have a hand in casting decisions too. I would watch this movie for Cranston alone.

Photos are from February, April and June. Credit: WENN.com

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

51 Responses to “Ben Affleck signed a multi-picture deal for Batman and has a say in the script”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. LB says:

    I think it was a smart choice for him to do it. He has literally nothing to lose (his cred mostly comes as a director and writer anyway and this won’t undo that) but can make bank, establish a further connection with the studio (so they will take on his pet projects) and who knows? Maybe he will do well.

    • V4Real says:

      I think Ben has a lot to lose. If this project fails or don’t get the results they want they are going to make Ben the scapegoat. He would most likely take the blame for the failure, not the studio.

      So Whedon is giving Ben the big two thumbs up and encouraging him to take on Batman. Well of course he is because when this movie fail Whedon will be on top with The Avengers 2 which comes out the same year. Why wouldn’t he applaude someone who is a less than stellar actor to take on a role that is his competition (at least the fanboys see it as competition). Ben is a good writer but it doesn’t mean his writing will translate well into comic writing. But let’s just wait and see.

      • LB says:

        I don’t think Ben will take the blame. The first Superman movie was already a dud. Yeah, it made money and so will the next one. But it didn’t really make a name for itself with Cavill, et al. I can’t see Ben’s addition making it any worse.

        The studio would also be dumb to blame him since his directed movies have been bringing in the studio money. Both The Town and Argo over-performed. Quite frankly, I agree with Lainey on this. I think he did this so the studio would continue to fund his personal pet projects.

      • Jessica says:

        I think he has a lot to lose actually. He’d almost succeeded in making people forget all the terrible films he acted terribly in, largely by not doing too much high profile acting. He wrote himself two parts he knew he could handle, he did a couple of smaller films where he was propped up by better actors…and most importantly he re-invented himself as a director first and foremost.

        Already this news has reminded people of Daredevil, of Gigli, and of all the other crap he used to do for a paycheck (remember Paycheck?). Even if he’s a good Batman, he doesn’t have Christian Bale’s resume (or Nolan behind the camera) to lend the role prestige. Batman isn’t an amazing part for an actor. He’s not going to blow people away with his dramatic acting in Superman 2. Best case he get’s out relatively unscathed, but he’ll be hoping his next film as director wins a few awards to get him back some credibility. Worst case he’s as horribly wooden, as he usually is in big movies, and he and the film bomb with critics in which case he’s just back-tracked his career by 5 years.

        It would be different if he’d gotten a supporting role in Nolan’s Batman films, or even a role in an Iron Man film or something in The Avengers. Those franchises had/have a ton of goodwill propping them up. Man of Steel made a lot of money, but it wasn’t loved like those films are, it wasn’t a critical darling and it failed to make a proper star of it’s lead. Which is why Affleck’s been cast. Cavill isn’t the draw Man of Steel was supposed to make him, so they’ve gone looking for one, but Affleck isn’t a draw when he’s in front of the camera and he’s the one with the most to lose here.

      • V4Real says:

        @Jessica First let me say this I’m a fan of Ben even though some on this site calls him a douche. That being said I have to agree with everything you just said. Ben will take the hit if this film is a dud. The studio will not take the blame, that’s beneath them and how Hollywood works. The blame always falls on the star of the project.
        They are going to say well we gave him creative control and let him make decisions on the route the film should take.

        People have started to look back at the old Ben and his flops from back then. Wow and “Paycheck” even I tried to forget that one.

    • Emily C. says:

      George Clooney keeps a picture of himself as Batman in his office to remind himself never to do a project solely for the paycheck. It was a mistake for him and it will be an even bigger mistake for Affleck. Clooney was quickly able to prove himself as an actor after his Batman disaster. Affleck will never prove himself as an actor because he just isn’t very good.

  2. This movie sounded stupid from the get-go, so the cating of Affleck didn’t actually ruin my expectations too much. And if he directs the Justice League movie I can at least say I’m looking forward to that a tiny bit more 🙂

  3. HiHa says:

    No just NO!

  4. Samtha says:

    That he has a say in the script is actually a bit of a relief, for me. Whatever his acting skills are, he’s a good writer and a knowledgeable filmmaker. He’s also a comic book fan. MOS’s screenplay was awful. At the very least, Ben may be able to keep the script from going off the rails–and keep it truer (more true?) to the source material.

    • LadyMTL says:

      Yeah, same here. I’m not a huge fan of him as an actor (I mean, am I the only one who still remembers his crap like Gigli or Daredevil?) but as a writer / director, he’s got the stuff.

      I guess I’ll reserve judgement…for now.

      • V4Real says:

        Just because Ben is a good writer for dramactic scripts doesn’t mean he will be good at writing scripts for Superhero movies.

        WB is so thirsty for success that they are willing to do almost anything.

      • Samtha says:

        @V4Real, that’s true. I do think Ben has respect for the source material, though, which will at least keep out some of the…stranger choices Warner Brothers had made (or allowed). I’m also hoping that he has a good idea of his own acting rage and helps tailor the script to that.

        He’s horribly miscast, but the fact that he’s involved in the writing at least gives me some hope.

      • Sabrine says:

        I can see him as Batman but he’ll have to high tail his pudgy body to the gym asap. He needs to trim down and bulk up although I guess they could put fake muscles inside the Batman suit.

    • brin says:

      I agree and the addition of Bryan Cranston (if true) would be fantastic!

    • mom2two says:

      I’ll reserve judgement on Ben. I don’t like the casting because I do find him bland, I would have liked to see someone who could use the break and I feel it’s uninspired (just like if the rumors of Damon being Aquaman come true) casting.
      The Cranston as Lex Luthor rumors have been going around before Affleck’s casting and the rumor states if it is Cranston, it’s not going to be announced until the end of Sept. when Breaking Bad ends. Why that matters, I don’t know. I think Cranston would be terrific as Lex Luthor (and if it is Ben’s idea, good call) and I would watch the movie just for him, I do feel like it’s a little too on the nose though. Cranston is in his mid-fifties and I don’t think he’s worried about typecasting. His career has never been hotter.

  5. don't kill me i'm french says:

    Fire Snyder and Goyer (the first Man Of Steel was awful in my opinion)
    Ben Affleck is too famous to play Batman/Wayne.
    Batman doesn’t need a famous actor.He needs a good director,a good writer and a good semi-unknown actor

    • E-V-E says:

      amen to that. That’s what I keep saying, but it seems everyone was so focused on poor (and decent) Cavil, that noone seemed to have noticed what garbage of a script Goyer delivered and Snyder just shot it in his usual fashion.

      • V4Real says:

        Oh I’ve said it over and over that the script was bad. It lacked good dialogue and they threw in way too much CGI and action sequences to make up for what the script was missing. Cavill’s dry acting just added fuel to the fire. They should have went with Tom Welling from Smallvile. At least he already had a fanbase.

  6. blue marie says:

    I don’t think this will be a good idea, but he might prove me wrong.

  7. Mia 4S says:

    This makes no sense!

    Is he poor? Is his gambling problem much worse than we know?!

    I get it, I do. WB has been desperate for someone to be the face of their comic book movies ever since Bale and the Nolan brothers said thanks but we are really rich now and don’t need the grief. Smart boys! Affleck is no RDJ, he’s not even half an RDJ.

  8. MsAubra says:

    Ben is sexy

    • floretta50 says:

      No he is not, he is bland., winning an oscar don’t suddenly turn you into an acting personality you are not. I think that jealousy of people like Robert Downy Jr and other leading actors who have their franchise is driving Ben to get himself the Batman franchise. Could you see Alec Baldwin doing Batman? No, Ben Affleck is a fine actor but too serious and political. They really shouldn’t have done it to the Batman character.

  9. junegorilla says:

    Disaster in the making. Waterworld/Ishtar level.

  10. Elodie says:

    Multi-picture deal???

    I quit.

  11. Dawn says:

    I love Ben but I just don’t see him as Batman. Hopefully he will prove me wrong! I loved him when he played the original actor (George Reeves?) who played the first Superman in the 50’s however and have to say that movie left me depressed and wondering what really went down.

  12. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    Batman bores me to no end.

  13. kim says:

    Wouldn’t it be hilarious if assfleck went to see lilo in rehab to confirm names of escorts(hookers) people doing batman were paying to blackmail them into the batman role. Ben was paying hookers too, which is how he new some info beforehand. Like anyone believes the lecherous creepy ben would be faithful to weak “victim” mentality Jen? Just hilarious…

  14. CL says:

    wait, remake “The Stand”? Why? That was one of my favorite Stephen King books when I was growing up and the basis for my ongoing love of distopian stories.

    Also, I thought Ben was SO happy with the level of praise he was getting for his directing efforts. Why mess with that?

    • apsutter says:

      The Stand is my favorite of the 90’s King miniseries. I’d watch it anytime it was on and love that it’s on Netflix. Gary Sinise and Rob Lowe were great in it.

    • Bridget says:

      That’s the part that disappoints me the most, that he’s backed out of The Stand! I’ve alwaysthought that the miniseries (that I somehow end up watching every time it’s on TV) was only OK. I loved some of the casting (Gary Sinise, Rob Lowe, Dawber!) but I was so disappointed with the women they chose. Molly Ringwald was such a weird choice for Franny.

  15. Lisa says:

    Affleck could learn a very big and important lesson from George Clooney (who also played Batman, coincidentally). Affleck doesn’t have a very big range and he’s much better off if he stays within that range. Clooney has done so well in part because he knows his range and stays within it. I’m not saying Affleck is as good as even Clooney, but if Affleck were more self-aware and stayed in his range, he’d avoid a lot of this ridiculousness and have a better career.

  16. kpist says:

    Ben is a “fanboy”, I think he’ll really try to do a good job. He has played Daredevil.

    • Mia 4S says:

      Yeah he played Daredevil…which was AWFUL.

      How is that a positive?

    • Emily C. says:

      When I took an acting class, I tried really hard too. I got great marks in stuff involving enunciation, memorization, and analysis, and even better marks in writing. I stunk at acting, though I tried my best. It was embarrassing for everyone involved. Some people just do not belong in front of the camera, and Ben Affleck is one of them.

  17. LAK says:

    I’ve got a bridge to sell anyone who believes that Control freak Chris Nolan will allow Ben Affleck to tinker with his baby!

    FYI, SUPERMAN vs BATMAN is already in prep. That means majority of script has been approved. Ben might have some say, but they’ll be minor details. Just like Zack Snyder found he had to cede most decisions even though he was the director.

    • Mia 4S says:

      Sorry at @LARK but Nolan’s already fled to higher ground before this flood of crap hits. He’s an “executive producer”, which means money, but no creative input. He’s moved on to original projects; which is part of the reason WB is sooo desperate!

      The story is WB begged Chris Nolan (and his brother Jonah) to take on the DC comics movies like Whedon has. However neither guy is that much of a comic book fan and neither needs money or credibility. Nolan was not heavily on Man of Steel at all, the “godfathering” was a compromise agreement with WB. So both brothers said thanks but no thanks. David Goyer will carry over but his name doesn’t carry the recognition WB is looking for.

      • LAK says:

        I have a friend who works at Warner Brothers who says differently. on both films.

        They aren’t privy to the contractual shenanigans that take place so i will take your word on that point, but they are involved with the productions so i believe what they are saying because they are privy to that aspect of the business.

        And even if i didn’t have their information, the fact that MOS looks and feels like a Chris Nolan film as opposed to a Zack Synder film in tone, look, and story set up devoid of nearly all of Zack Snyder’s signature pieces shows how involved Chris was even though he is credited with very little of the process.

      • Mia 4S says:

        If that’s true why are they downplaying his involvement in the sequel? So far they’ve said he’s not doing the story or the script, he’s an executive producer, not a producer. Also zero quotes from him on Affleck’s casting. I’m starting to get the impression WB wants it to look like he’s heavily involved, like they’ll mention a plot point to him and the commissary and suddenly, “Nolan gave the script his approval!”. 😉

        Something’s off here…

  18. Mandy says:

    meh. I’m not even into the Batman movies, but I still say this was a bad call.

  19. apsutter says:

    Personally I think Affleck is going to suck as Batman but I love so much that they cast Bryan Cranston as Lex Luthor. That man is KILLING it every week as Walter White.

  20. Esmerelda says:

    Ok, the dream Superman movie is an Oliver Stone version of the President Luthor storyline. WB, can we please have that?
    Batfleck makes no sense: he looks wimpy, clever and nice. No Batman there. Or is this to be hipster-ironic-eyeroll-batman?
    A meta-movie where Affleck is a middle manager who reads comics books and imagines what would it be like to be the Batman?

  21. Shoe_Lover says:

    maybe he will suck. maybe he will surprise everyone. He has had some decent roles. He was great in Dogma, he was pretty sexy in Pearl Harbour and as they say “Affleck was the bomb in Phantoms”

    Also,
    http://www.buzzfeed.com/awesomer/you-should-give-ben-affleck-a-shot-at-batman

  22. Dommy Dearest says:

    Still maintain Supes should have had another movie before they brought in another hero of Batman magnitude. It’s pretty obvious Superman sequel would have flopped so they had to inject something in there to make it better. But all that’s happened is it turned comic fans against the movie. So, good job Hollywood in messing things up. Can’t get Harry Potter right so onto other things to screw up.

    Can all of the writers be fired and fans actually get to write scripts now? We all have better movie ideas than recycling everything and spitting it out again.

  23. emma says:

    I don’t care if Ben Affleck is Batman or not, I’m sure he’ll be great. What I’m upset about is ANOTHER BATMAN FREAKING REBOOT EFFINLAWDABOVE! When will it end?! Batman isn’t that interesting even!!!!! Give it maybe 10 years. Please, give us a break. Not another Spiderman either. AAHHHHH

    • Shoe_Lover says:

      I’m just sick of the reboots/remakes period! Hollywood needs a major originality injection

  24. Rudy says:

    Terrible, terrible idea. Ben Affleck is the anti-Batman.

    Even if Ben acts his tushie off, I predict this going down as the worst Batman ever. Maybe they can minimize the role. lol