Kim Kardashian talks selfies, filters & social media with Paper Mag: vapid?

kim1

I’ve gone back and forth whether we should even show the extended editorial from Kim Kardashian’s Paper Magazine cover. And I’m still thinking that… no, we shouldn’t. I don’t want to participate in it. You can see Kim’s fully greased-up naked body in these NSFW shots. I’ll admit it, I looked. Some of the photos don’t look Photoshopped to a ridiculous level, but that “booty” shot is the worst offender. They manipulated the crap out of that photo. Oh, and in case you’re wondering… Kim didn’t get paid for this shoot. She took off her kit for free. Anyway, Paper also released their interview with Kim. Here are some highlights from the piece which was, in a word, fawning.

Kim doesn’t use filters on her selfies: “I’m not really a filter person,” and that she doesn’t generally use them when she publishes her many selfies. As she talks, I notice that her skin, which is the golden color of whiskey, is free of wrinkles, crow’s feet, laugh lines, blemishes, freckles, moles, under-eye circles, scars, errant eyebrow hairs or human flaws of any kind.

Keeping Up With the Kardashians: She has called it “the best family movie ever,” never mind the rampant speculation, in early 2013, that season 9 would be her last. I’m surprised to hear that they still enjoy the process, since your typical American family would no longer be on speaking terms. “We’re kind of obsessed with each other,” she explains.

The paparazzi: “Literally every single day there’s about ten cars of paparazzi literally waiting outside our homes…You just have to not care. You just have to say, ‘This is our life, and it is what it is.’ All my friends tell me the world could be coming to an end, and I’m always so calm.”

Her 72-day marriage to Kris Humphries: “It’s just one of those life lessons that you have to learn, and it’s OK.”

Why she documents everything? “There’s nothing we can do that’s not documented, so why not look your best, and amazing?”

Selfies: “My makeup artist said to me the other day, ‘You haven’t taken a selfie in a while,'” Kardashian says, as the afternoon slides into evening and the light turns magic-hour blue. To remedy this, she posted one of herself in full makeup and a white terrycloth robe, with the literal caption, “It’s been a while since I’ve taken a selfie.” It garnered more than a half-a-million likes. Selfies have been on her mind lately. She is putting together a collection of her oeuvre, called Selfish, to be published by Rizzoli in the spring. She has spent hours sifting through her vast, meticulously organized digital archive. “The book company edited them, and I was like, ‘Wait a minute! There are like 300 here that you’re not adding!'” she says. I remark that I am surprised she can remember and differentiate among a bunch of near-identical photos of her face. She can, she says; she is organizing them chronologically, dating them by what she wore to specific events. “I know what I wore, what accessories I wore, where I was, who I was with,” she tells me. “I remember everything.” Her mind, it seems, traps the minutiae most of us forget. For her, though, it’s not minutiae; it’s her life, and her life is her career.

Whether she would exist without social media: “I don’t think so…” she says, slowly, then reconsiders. “I don’t think social media was that heavy when we started our show, but I think we really evolved with social media… I love sharing my world with people,” Kardashian tells me, and I detect no hint of falseness. “That’s just who I am.”

[From Paper]

Well, at least she’s self-aware enough to admit that social media has played and continues to play a huge part in her fame. Most of the Paper article reads like an analysis of just why Kim is famous, why she’s a smart businesswoman, and how she’s like the personification of everything Andy Warhol ever said about fame and celebrity. I kind of agree with all of it – Kim is an extremely vapid and superficial woman, but she doesn’t pretend to be anything else. And she’s also a smart businesswoman.

We get asked a lot about why we cover the Kardashian-Jenners, and what I always say (and it’s true) is that they are “gossip filler.” They’re always good for a headline, you don’t have to think that much about them, and everyone always has an opinion about them. They get pushed to the side when real celebrities are doing more important things and that’s fine. That’s the way it should be. Don’t ask me to really care that much (or at all) that Kim posed naked, because I still don’t get it. As in, I don’t get why it’s a big deal at all. We’ve seen her naked so many times.

kim3

kim2

Photos courtesy of Paper, Kim’s Instagram.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

117 Responses to “Kim Kardashian talks selfies, filters & social media with Paper Mag: vapid?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Abbott says:

    Kim K: Giving hope to pretty, talentless girls everywhere since 2008.

    • Orlanda says:

      You’ve made my day.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Lol. You forgot “a family business.”

    • Pamela says:

      They and You forgot about Paris Hilton – the archetype of modern fame whore. We should give Paris some lifetime achievement award – (Wh)oscar or The Golden Whore.

      • Tristan says:

        Kim Kartrashian makes Paris Hilton look like the very epitome of elegance, grace, taste & class. It is impossible to hit lowest common denominator more the KK, her dreadful douchebag husband & her equally dreadful Klan. If only the lot of them would disappear

      • ohhplease... says:

        Kim was just the grovelling personal assistant to Paris not so long ago.

    • Tiffany27 says:

      Man, you first commenters have been SLAYING it these past few days hahahahahaha.

    • Petee says:

      The reason why people are making a big deal about her posing naked is because she has stated she would not be doing anymore nudity.She is a hypocrite and liar and most don’t like that kind of person.The pictures were ridiculous and it was not about a woman celebrating her body after having a baby.It was all about Kim and how “amazing”she thinks she is.

    • gina says:

      Come on……how many of us can use our asses as coffee tables? She can multi-task.

      • swack says:

        When I was pregnant, I could use my belly as a table – does that count???

      • gina says:

        Haha. Yeah that’s a trick us preggo girls can do. But I’ve never seen a kid being carried in the butt before. She truly is in awe of herself.

      • hunter says:

        That’s not actually her ass with the glass on it, that’s 100% photoshop. Take a closer look – while shelf-like, her ass doesn’t stick out that far.

    • H says:

      Pretty, vapid girls have always had many, many role models in film and media, as long as there has been popular culture. It’s an archetype.

    • Tiffany :) says:

      In WONDERFUL news…The comet got more internet traction than the ass of doom did. Yay!

  2. B says:

    Literally. She’s repetitive. Literally.

  3. Loopy says:

    What is wrong with Kanye West that he signed of on this,how do you allow your naked oily wife to do a full nude frontal.

  4. Splinter says:

    Yeah, her face “is free of wrinkles, crow’s feet, laugh lines, blemishes, freckles, moles, under-eye circles, scars, errant eyebrow hairs or human flaws of any kind” and any expression whatsoever, we’ve noticed.

    • SnarkGirl says:

      That was some very delicately done shade I think. 😉

      • ol cranky says:

        was that shade? my first thought is that instead of being paid, she paid them to write how perfect she looks

        and, seriously: Her 72-day marriage to Kris Humphries: “It’s just one of those life lessons that you have to learn, and it’s OK.”

        what life lesson that needed to be learned was that? that marrying to further your famewhoring ways let’s everyone know you have the depth of a windowpane but it’s OK because you made a boatload of money?

    • Sea Dragon says:

      That made me giggle. She’s made herself look inhuman, like an Exotic T&A Barbie, sex tape sold separately. She acts just like one as well. Bubble brain, bubble face, bubble breasts, bubble butt.

    • tifzlan says:

      I know, like, why is looking like a lifeless mannequin something to be proud of?

  5. GoodNamesAllTaken says:

    I came into the black hole of the Kardashians because of my weird obsession with Kim’s bottom, and why someone would get butt implants. Now that I’ve seen it nude, albeit photoshopped or whatever to hell and back, I think I’ll consider the circle complete and check out. What else is there to be said about these foul jokers that hasn’t already been said? I’m tired of soiling my brain.

  6. Ben Dover says:

    What happens when she’s older? Where do Ass implants go to die?

    • Splinter says:

      Google and you’ll regret it

    • mimif says:

      Triple Dog Dare you to Google it.

    • SnarkGirl says:

      She is going to keep getting lifts and Botox and implants and fillers until the day she dies. She is *not* going to cope well with aging, and when she finally gets to the point where surgery & fillers simply can’t do anything, it’s going to be very ugly – in a visual and emotional sense.

      • Jayna says:

        Spot on. She has filled her face with so much already that when she cries her face looks distorted because the lips and face and eyes can’t move normally. LOL

      • Sea Dragon says:

        Tory Spelling used to be pumped with filler and the other day when CB posted a pic and the plumpness was all gone, I was shocked at how rippled her face seemed. Apparently too much botox for too long a time stretches your skin for good. You’re right Snarky, her self esteem is invested in her appearance so much so they she’ll hurt once she hits 40.
        is headed for the same fate if she ever looses her bank account.

      • Sea Dragon says:

        *Typo and a half written extra thought. Oops!

  7. Jessica says:

    I don’t understand why anyone is shocked about her naked photos. This is a woman who became famous for having sex on camera. She’s been in Playboy. She’s done other naked photo spreads before – like this year. So I’m not sure why people are so up in arms that she posed naked again. That’s what she does, that’s the image she’s put out there since the beginning.

    • Marie-France says:

      I don´t see anything wrong with an exposed butt nor does it shock me. And I like Jean-Paul Goude a lot. But (t) to celebrate and make so much fuzz over a fake, plastic ass is ridiculous. Kim´s ass is all Mattel material. What is natural is special, otherwise it just feels like an ad for a product. I think that Kanye loves J-P Goude. Amber Rose also did a remake of one of his Grace Jones photos. That one was really nice, though.

      • Jayna says:

        And the fact that they then photoshopped her waist and her back and shoulders to be unrecognizable as part of her body, the way it’s built. She doesn’t have a small-boned back and shoulders and itsy-bitsy waist. It was all photoshopped to make her a s s look even bigger and the whole back shot looks cartoonish to me. There is nothing about the back shot of her that looks real. So art?

        When I celebrate nudes, it’s when the body is real, like Madonna’s nudes back in the day, that weren’t shot to look cartoonish.

        Now, the front nude shot of Kim, while photoshopped, still looked like her body, and she has great boobs. She looked great, but shooting h er vagina, I didn’t see the point going that far. But I don’t really care. It’s not her first day at the rodeo. It’s all been seen before, so it doesn’t matter to me if she goes full frontal.

      • H says:

        It’s not photoshopped. It’s very much edited and manipulated but Goude doesn’t use Photoshop. He literally cuts and pastes. Goude seems to be about surreal sexuality and bodies that are changed and altered almost to the point of the grotesque, which is pretty much a perfect fit with Kim’s whole deal. I’d never heard of him before this, but I’ve enjoyed learning about his art, even though I have mixed feelings about it.

      • Charlie says:

        I don’t get the outrage either. So far I’ve heard these reasons:
        She’s naked – It’s her body and she can do what she wants with it.
        She said she won’t do it again – She changed her mind, the horror.
        She’s too photoshopped – If I remember correctly, Demi Moore had one leg on a magazine cover. They’re all photoshopped.

    • Adrien says:

      Some people were offended because she’s a Mom. I’m not. When you look at the photos, her joyous face is the one that you will notice not her naked body and I believe evryone agrees that she looked lovely in the pictures. I think the real issue here is that the photographer recycled one of his racist art. He is known to fetishize black women.

      • noway says:

        I don’t think everyone would say she looked lovely in the pictures. Lovely is not a word I would use to describe her. I could see sexy, brazen, some other words that I would not write, but not lovely. I don’t think it is the Mom thing either, to be honest I know when I think of Kim it isn’t as Mom of the year.

        It seems some find the nudity itself a bit much, especially Americans. The vast majority though, myself included, just can’t deal with the fakeness and distortion of the female body. She looks like a plastic oiled Barbie with a big butt. The part that bothers me the most is when asked about the photoshop of the pictures the editor said it really wasn’t more than usual. Now that I believe, which is a sad statement on society. As a woman I want to photoshop a man so his bulge is as big as Texas and have that seem normal in society.

  8. NewWester says:

    A piece of paper has more personality and character than Kim K. The only difference is that Kim knows how to work the system. She knows exactly what she is doing. Her fifteen minutes will never be up. Kim has taken that clock, smashed it and thrown the pieces in the ocean

  9. LK says:

    Lol at the lady in the second pic’s expression.

    • Sullivan says:

      Right? Maybe I’ve watched too many creepy movies, but that woman looks like she’d have a baby doll in one hand and a knife in the other.

  10. swack says:

    I would like to see the original photos to see how much she was or wasn’t photoshopped.

    • Booklion says:

      Buzzfeed done an article showing what Kims pics would look like if she had a natural waistline or something like that. It is the closest you’ll ever get to an unphotoshopped version where the Kardashians are concerned.

      Also, if I was famous and my interviews were only ever about Selfies, sexiness, social media, failed relationships, instagram filters etc etc, I would be embarrassed. Does Kim not realize how vapid her entire existence in the celebrity sphere is? I have never seen her give a genuine, topical interview before and although there are many celebs in the same boat as Kim, she is the only one who actually seems proud of her entire celeb persona, you just know she loves these interviews etc cause they are totally void of any depth and meaning.

  11. Darkladi says:

    Not surprised. KimmieKakes has been a getmoneyb*tch from Day 1. She’s knows what she’s doing

  12. Talie says:

    Jean-Paul Goude is an iconic photographer — not surprised she wanted to go there with him. It’d be like if Herb Ritts wanted to shoot you or Helmut Newton. It’s kind of an honor.

    • ketjo says:

      a Iconic photographer is someone like Ansel Adams ……Jean-Paul Goude is a Photographer period …He is not a artist….He is a manipulator of photos a mimic of photography but he is not iconic anywhere except in the world of fashion…..He got lucky and famous for his fetish of posing black woman in contorted positions and hasn’t done anything worth a hill of beans or out of ordinary since then…..Kims Photos are all copies of past photos…they have been retouched and photoshopped to they are completely unreal…even her private parts have been altered to look like a 5 yr old girls instead of a grown woman who has pushed a baby thru them ..

  13. Totes says:

    You know I actually liked the Champagne pic and I liked the butt pic. I thought they were creative old school burlesque glam.

    Now that I’m seeing the full frontals…it’s just like why? We don’t need to see your vagina.

    There is something really sad and creepy about Kim K.
    she takes one step forward and two steps back.

  14. Jayna says:

    I read a little bit of the article about her and stopped. Vapid is kind to describe her.

  15. Belle Epoch says:

    The kissy picture is strange. He’s sortof mashing his face against KK’s head while the lady in the background is watching something crawl out of his other ear. And Kim looks like she thinks we’re all going to be jealous. No, we’re not.

  16. gina says:

    A blow up doll that won’t stop talking. Somebody please take out the batteries.

  17. Artemis says:

    Why would she care about paps? She calls them herself and she uses their pictures on her social media networks so.

    That book Selfish will sell well.

    She knows social media was important for her fame. She used is well before most people jumped on the bandwagon and she did evolve faster than the rest of them. She used it better than other celebs who were probably forced to do it because they were falling behind and needed to connect with fans the modern way.

    As for her nude pictures. Who cares? Honestly, it’s not just because we’ve seen her nude before, it’s also the fact that every single day there are women who get photographed naked. Amateur, professional; for public consumption or private use; artistic or not; it doesn’t matter. The nude body is probably one of the most photographed subjects in art because it’s so fascinating so why are people still up in arms about it? Is it that big of a deal? There are whole sections of books that display the naked body and people are going to clutch pearls because Kim is naked? Err, ok.

    • ketjo says:

      Its not a big deal ordinarily …like you said its just there anywhere you look if you are looking for it……
      Why is this different….because is was a planned full blown campaign , the trumpets blaring and the drums rolling and elephants marching down the street as the Announcer standing on top of a huge wagon uses his Megaphone to announce the Circus is in town …and Naked Kim was the main attraction. ……The Media is the Announcer now a days….and Kim knows how to use it to a tee… ” Hurry Hurry Hurry ….See the most beautiful woman in the World in all her Naked Glory.. She will astound you with her bountiful curves and vivacious beauty…a once in a like time event !!!” ….till next month when she will show it all again.

  18. Skins says:

    I think the best thing about the pictures is the utterly stupid look on her face. I mean, like, literally she looks as dumb as a box of rocks. Like, I also think that literally, this could be a career killer, lets all hope so

    • Ohreallynow says:

      That’s what I said, please let this be the beginning of the end of them.

    • word says:

      At this point, nothing seems to kill her “career”. The only thing would be Kanye divorcing her and putting out a really good album with all the Kardashian secrets. That might do it.

  19. Ohreallynow says:

    She might as well just be naked anyways and save herself the hassle of clothes. Her clothes are so tight and has all her parts busting out anyways and the see through tops she wears, she might as well just go naked b/c that’s what she wants to do anyways. She has no other way to get attention or try to sell something other than using her body. So this just makes sense for her to do something like this. Its kind of a sad life in my opinion.

  20. Queenbee says:

    I couldn’t read past this line without throwing up.

    ”does anyone else have eyelashes that resemble miniature feather dusters?”

    Umm yes, anyone with eyelash extensions…..

    • embee says:

      And her “giant Bambi-eyes their whites whiter, and the lashes that frame them seem longer.” I’ve always thought her lashes look like spiders

  21. whatsmyname? says:

    Her face looks like it would hurt when she smiles. And the women standing behind Kim and Kanye have the same expression as me reading this interview.

  22. lassie says:

    I don’t understand why her selfie book would be a best seller. Why would you get it? For a gift for someone? Who is the demographic for this book? It’s not for art lovers or people who appreciate iconic people with lovely backgrounds, it is literally a book of pictures of a person’s face that you don’t know personally that were taken with a phone. That’s like looking at a stranger’s Facebook or Instagram feed. Why would you pay fifty bucks for that?

    • Charlie says:

      I don’t understand coffee table books (is that what her “book” is?) at all. Books are for reading, not decoration.

  23. Lex says:

    She looks beautiful in the black and white pic with her eyes closed

  24. FingerBinger says:

    I’m going to go with vapid. She’s saying a 72 day marriage is “just one of those life lessons that you have to learn, and it’s OK.” That’s an interesting view to have on marriage especially is a second marriage.

    • Dawn says:

      I think that statement goes to her immaturity and her selfishness level. Never once did she think how it might be for KH. Nope it was all about her and her being so brave to ask for a divorce after 72 days of a marriage. Most people would have annulled the fake marriage but NOT Kim. Nope she instead made sure to get herself pregnant by West on probably day 92 of the fake marriage and made sure to refuse Humphries the annulment that he deserved to get. He is much more a gentleman than any of the Kardashians and West. He ended up just feeling sorry for her and in my book that makes him about a million times better than her or her sick family could ever hope to be.

      • anon33 says:

        Kris Humphries is NOT a gentleman. He has GLARINGLY obvious issues with women and control. Before the wedding episode/the following season where some of the footage was admitted to have been re-shot, when he and Kim were just dating, he said absolutely AWFUL things to her all the time: that she was dumpy, that she dressed like a whore, that she smelled bad, that he couldn’t stand her sisters. Whatever your feelings are about that family, I would hope that everyone can agree that people in a dating relationship should not treat each other like that. He was emotionally abusive AT BEST, and this was happening long before they got engaged or had even discussed living together.

      • swack says:

        @anon33 – so you think that because he said awful things on a show that they have editing priviledges on, that he is not a gentleman. So, if he was so emotionally abusing, then why did Kim marry him. She had doubts but still married him anyway. Also, during the divorce you heard little to nothing from him about Kim. All the stories were about him holding up the divorce when she wouldn’t sit for her deposition. Whereas he did his deposition as quickly as possible.

      • jwoolman says:

        Anon33- Humphries wasn’t abusive. He was blunt, a Midwestern cultural trait. He treated her like a normal person. A lot of things that have been interpreted as “mean” were obviously intended to be comforting, especially if you actually saw him say it. Kim’s reactions to him were weird and hostile. He found her more and more confusing as time went on. I doubt she ever bothered to seriously talk with him when the cameras were off. Real people work out their differences that way. If something your significant other does or says bothers you, then you talk about it and learn something about each other. She filed for divorce without mentioning it to him and never did any counseling. He was never a significant other to her. I still don’t know why she thought she could do that without consequences. Maybe Kanye said he would marry her if she weren’t already married, and she rushed to trade up financially.

  25. embee says:

    My family has had better “family movies” than what Kim calls KUWTK. Too many Kardashian family videos. I take a selfie once in a while,my make up artist hasn’t just finished my hours work of make up. I don’t have one. Don’t know if it’s worse that she actually did those Paper pictures for free or if she would have been paid.

  26. Sam H xx says:

    What is concerning to read is that the photographer she worked with has a shady history in racially exploiting and objectifying black women. Probably didn’t even occur to anyone of them to look him up because they are such a shallow and vapid family. I hope Nori defies the ‘family business’ and paves her own path.

  27. Brionne says:

    I am guilty of defending Kim because I feel/felt she is often body shamed for having the curvy spoon big butt figure in a world that worships slim thighs and perky butts. I wasn’t even too concerned with the booty cover. Eh. It’s a big booty. If you’ve seen one you’ve seen them all. I’ve seen bigger butts on church ladies, modestly covered of course but still church butt is the definitive big booty.

    But with the full frontal of her boobs and hoo-hah hanging out for the world to see and this silly grin with not even an effort to “artfully” cover her nips and mons pubis…I don’t think I can defend her anymore…nor is there a reason to.

    This morning I read that this same photographer shot this exact same champagne glass on the ass pose in 1976 for a book of Black nudes called Jungle Fever…I wondered if Kim and Kanye were even aware of this and if so why recreate something associated with “Jungle Fever” . Was the photographer mocking Kim and Kanye? Was she just just so excited about working with this photographer that she didn’t realize this is a recreated pose from a book, Jungle Fever? I don’t suppose it’s such a big deal but it seems crass and exploitative. Oops! There I go again defending her when she obviously doesn’t care enough to defend herself from strange choices. No more!

    • word says:

      But she did a sex tape and playboy years ago…you still defended her after that, but not after these latest pics?

      • Brionne says:

        I thought it was youthful indiscretion and then making lemonade out of lemons. It also seemed to me that people were going to the extreme in meangirling her and her family, calling them trash, calling them evil, saying all manner of exaggerated things. But I really lost the ability to care. It feels like an unwise choice.

      • word says:

        She was 26 years old when she decided to sign away the rights to her sex tape in exchange for millions. She was 29 when she posed nude for playboy (give or take a year). That is not “youthful indiscretion”. She was a fully grown woman when she made those decisions. I don’t think her family is “evil” but they sure aren’t very likable.

    • swack says:

      I read that article also. And for two people who cry racism, I’m surprised that they worked with this photographer.

      • ketjo says:

        because my dears he is another member of Kanye West French G. a y designer Circle….and personal friends to his “friend Riccardo” …there is nothing ‘by chance ” about this whole thing…….

  28. word says:

    I’m starting to think the magazine purposely made the photoshop super visible just to get attention as they know a nude pic of Kim is nothing new. They also released the cover during a week where there has been no big celeb news. Everyone and their dog has seen this girl naked…who cares. Now if Kanye was the one to pose nude, I could see the hoopla but it’s never a man and always a woman because I guess that’s all some women think they’re worth. In Kim’s case it’s true though, this is ALL she’s got. I’m also so tired of people calling Kim a “smart business woman”. She is not the one behind DASH or any of the other businesses. She just does what her mom tells her to do. Real business women are busy doing business not taking selfies 100 times a day and going on 20 vacations a year. Her mom is the true hustler, let’s be real.

  29. CoolWhipLite says:

    Goodness, she is a complete twat.

    In the last photo, the girl in the background with the dark lipstick looks as though she is observing a science experiment. I guess she truly is — it’s a social science experiment. Gross.

  30. Loren says:

    #freenorth

  31. me says:

    I was watching E News and they did an interview with the editor (or someone like that) from Paper Magazine. He said he was present at the shoot a long with Kim’s bodyguard and assistant. No one else was allowed (probably because Kim was afraid someone would take pics and post them unphotoshopped). He said this was the “happiest he’s ever seen Kim”. You’d think as a new mom, the “happiest” would be when she’s with her daughter, but nope. She’s happiest when she’s taking her clothes off. I have to say, this is the most comfortble I’ve ever seen her. Her body finally got a rest from the spanx and extremely tight clothing. I’m shocked Kanye wasn’t there. He’s so controlling over Kim’s image you’d think he’d be there directing the whole thing.

    • ketjo says:

      Yes it is a funnier shock because they are bragging about how he was there and helped with the whole shoot and that only her personal makeup man whom she posed with along with Kanye and the designer were there…. and how Kanye Allowed the makeup artist rub oil all over his wife’s body her front as well as her rear…So tell me just how many lies are they going put out about those photoshopped fake nudes of her…..article posted courtesy of DM article

    • swack says:

      From other reports he was there. So who knows. @ketjo, we must have been typing at the same time. Also, thanks to you reponse to my comment above. I have no idea (and don’t care) who are friends of Kanye and Kim.

  32. me says:

    Did anyone read Piers Morgan’s article about Kim’s naked pics? He is so up her ass and is pretty much saying we are all jealous and how she’s so wonderful, smart, rich and we are all lazy losers. He’s lost it.

  33. Jana says:

    I find it completely odd that this woman never smiles in a photograph with her clothes on, but get her butt naked with a camera in the room and she is smiling like she won a beauty pageant.
    Maybe she should have been naked at her wedding, at least she’d be smiling in all the pictures, rather than look like she had a bad case of stomach flu.

  34. word says:

    You know what happens when Kim gets a lot of backlash over something…she diverts attention…and now that she’s a mother you know her trick is to post new pics of Nori…same old trick every time.

  35. weegiewarrior says:

    Thers a glasgow saying which I feel is appropriate in th circumstances – these pictures are “minging”. That naked one reminds me of a greasy chicken supper I ordered at th local chippy which I sent bak cos it was swimming in grease. ..yuck.

  36. Jonesy says:

    All that grease under those hot lights….eww….I bet she stunk up the entire room.

  37. Jules says:

    Vapid? Come on, she’s talking about her business. She’s her product; social media especially selfies are extremely important for promotion.

  38. LAK says:

    Yes!!!

  39. Kathy says:

    I often wonder if she would suffer from withdrawals if she didn’t have a picture taken once a day, would she get the shakes , forget what she looks like?

  40. embee says:

    Did they make a video when they had to take her out to the parking lot to use a water hose and squiggies and sponges to get that thick gross grease off of her

  41. jwoolman says:

    The pictures aren’t horrible, they’re just nudes. Two things struck me: how fake her derrière and her breasts look, and how amazingly happy she looks. I’ve never seen that real joy on her face in any picture with her daughter. There is a happy look parents have when gazing at their offspring (as long as the kid isn’t screaming) that Kim doesn’t seem to have. She poses for the camera with Nori but it never seems real (and Nori doesn’t respond as though it’s real).

    Kim is so focused on herself, it’s pathological. I’ve seen the same indications in bits of the show I’ve seen – she loses interest when the focus is on anyone else, for instance when her brother was on Dancing With the Stars she was busily texting rather than watching his performance. I wish she could unhook herself from that self-obsession and enjoy other parts of life. She will eventually not be able to rely on nude shots to lift her spirits and give her purpose.