Will Queen Elizabeth be able to travel to London to greet the new prime minister?

Queen Elizabeth has been in Scotland for weeks on her annual summer holiday. She usually stays in Balmoral through September, but this year it’s a bit different. Because of the Queen’s ongoing mobility and health issues, she’s already canceled one public appearance. If my records are correct, I don’t think she’s been seen in person since July 15 at any kind of event. Of course, we’ve gotten gloom and doom about the Queen’s health before, and then she turns up at events with a cane and a smile. So I don’t even know anymore. In any case, it seems that there are some concerns about whether the Queen will be able to travel to London in a few weeks to greet the new prime minister.

Sources close to Queen Elizabeth II this week told The Daily Beast that, in a few weeks’ time, she intends to break her summer sojourn at Balmoral Castle in Scotland, and travel down to London to perform one of her most important constitutional duties; inviting a new prime minister to form a government in her name.

A source told The Daily Beast, “It is expected she will interrupt her Balmoral break to return to London for the PM switch.” The source said that the “actual venue” would be confirmed nearer the time, in an attempt to leave some margin for error, but the reality is that now, if the 96-year-old queen does not make the long journey to London for the richly symbolic occasion on Tuesday, Sept. 6, disappointment and renewed speculation about her officially professed wellness will ensue.

The need for the queen to welcome a new PM has been occasioned by Britain’s ruling Conservative party ejecting Boris Johnson as its leader. Under Britain’s parliamentary system, the new party leader (probably the right-leaning Liz Truss) will become the new PM, and that new PM has to then be invited to form a government by the queen. And certainly, there is no denying that if it all works out, the resulting photo-op will be an impressive rejoinder to those who say the queen is too old and too frail to carry out her job and should step down.

Photographs of the ancient ritual…are usually disseminated to the press. The crowning of the last PM but one, Theresa May, was the subject of particular debate after the new leader was pictured genuflecting in front of the queen. So the reward, if it works out, wil be another fabulous ta-da moment for the queen, after the impressive double ta-da of the Jubilee, in which HM’s two balcony appearances, resplendent in mauve and green respectively, were the stuff of which the greatest theatrical minds could only dream of.

Some observers are now questioning whether it is really the wisest thing for HM to have set a very public tick-tock in motion by saying she will host the high profile ceremony in London rather than, for example, either doing it by video link, requesting the new PM come to Balmoral, or sending Charles in her place as she did to this year’s formal state opening of Parliament.

[From The Daily Beast]

I am once again asking the Queen’s aides to figure out some f–king way to make it easier for a 96-year-old woman to simply exist and get around. It should not be this difficult to make some subtle changes here and there! There is no reason for the Queen to schlep down to London just so the new prime minister can symbolically kiss the ring or whatever. Liz Truss can fly to Scotland and they can do this musty ceremony there. And let me tell you: the Queen won’t give this task to Prince Charles. She didn’t want to open Parliament this year, okay, fine, she sent Charles, William and Rose Hanbury’s husband. But the whole “forming a government in her name” thing has to be done by the Queen.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Instar.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

24 Responses to “Will Queen Elizabeth be able to travel to London to greet the new prime minister?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Seraphina says:

    My God, that first pic of her in the yellow dress drives home the fact she is old. For the love of all that is good, have some dignity Liz and pass the reigns to Chuck. You had your time.
    What would be awesome would be a surprise twist of abolishing the monarchy in her will and that is why she has death’s grip on the orb and scepter- pun intended.

    • Green girl says:

      It just feels so undignified. She and/or her courtiers are trying to prove a point but it just looks so sad.

    • equality says:

      She still needs a little under 2 years to pass Louis XIV’s length of reign. That’s likely what the goal is.

    • kirk says:

      I don’t think she’s going to pass the reins to Chuck until she dies. Clive Irving (the only Daily Beast journo writing about royals worth reading) did a pretty good job of explaining why in his 7/8/22 article “The One Thing the Queen and Boris Johnson Have in Common.”

  2. TeamMeg says:

    I hope she can make the trip. This new PM is likely to be the last one ever to be officially welcomed by this Queen. End of an era.

    • SarahCS says:

      I really wish it could be fitting that she’s welcoming (what is likely to be) our second female leader but it seems that Truss is set to give Maggie a run for her money in general awfulness and ‘it’s your fault if you’re poor’ tory policies. We in trouble.

      • Paz says:

        Third female leader – Thatcher, May, now possibly Truss.

      • The Hench says:

        Telling that Theresa May was only our second female PM and as recently as five years ago and already people are forgetting her existence.

        And, frankly, at the rate the Tory party are burning through leaders, this might not be the Queen’s last PM…..

      • SarahCS says:

        OMG I forgot May! I’m going to blame the heatwave and the fact that we’ve had what feels like 47 prime ministers and 79 elections since the tories took power.

    • swaz says:

      Couldn’t care less 🤢

  3. Southern Fried says:

    ta-da moment hahaha!

  4. Lilpeppa40 says:

    Good Lord, who on earth is writing this tripe:

    “So the reward, if it works out, wil be another fabulous ta-da moment for the queen, after the impressive double ta-da of the Jubilee, in which HM’s two balcony appearances, resplendent in mauve and green respectively, were the stuff of which the greatest theatrical minds could only dream of.”

    The greatest theatrical minds could only dream of? She stood on a balcony. That’s it, that’s all. She didn’t fly a plane herself, she didn’t ride a horse. Good God this sycophancy is sickening. I ignore them a lot of the time but it’s so unnecessarily over the top.

  5. Murphy says:

    It will happen.

  6. The Hench says:

    The thing is this is a complete non-story. The Queen may or may not meet the new PM, she may or may not deputise Charles, she may or may not dance the can-can whilst playing the harmonica to prove how fit she is but, whatever she does or doesn’t do, she will still be Queen. The woman is not giving up the throne until she dies – she has sworn to that fact and there are no performance indicators she has to hit to stay in post – other than to keep breathing.

    That there are no performance indicators is the key flaw of a monarchy.

  7. Roseberry says:

    They are so tone deaf with the reality of normal life and proper governance of this country.Today Sky news had a headline ‘Economy shrinks- with Jubilee partly to blame’.
    Apparently we’re about to go into a recession and a contributing factor is all those wasted non working days in June (and presumably the cost of all that nonsense’).
    If LT does become the next PM she wants to put the commissioning of a new royal yacht high on the agenda, she’ll consider it an honour to schlep up to Balmoral , genuflect and kiss hands.

    • SarahCS says:

      The BBC helpfully pointed out that it was ‘only’ 0.6% of GDP when it was predicted at 1.3%. I love their version of impartiality.

      So she still had a negative impact on the economy but not as many people cared / could afford time off as was expected?

  8. PunkPrincessPhD says:

    “ancient ritual” 🙄

    The UK* has only had an elected prime minister since 1720.

    • SnoodleDumpling says:

      Yeah, this is like when Star Trek pulls up some obscure bit of ‘ancient’ Earth history from the 20th century. 300 years old may be ancient but 300 years ago is not Antiquity.

  9. Jay says:

    I agree this is one job she’ll want to keep doing in person, but surely the PM can fly to her? I’ve heard that Liz Truss fancies herself as the second coming of the iron lady, so maybe QEII can give her some variation of the old “You, madam, are no Margaret Thatcher.”

    Speculating about the new PM is well and good, but what I really want to know is: Who will be on Boris’s honours recommendations list? He still gets to do that, right?

  10. Denise says:

    I hope whoever organizes this event will use common sense and let the PM go to TQ in Scotland instead of making this senior citizen come back to London for only this.

    On a shallow note: I really like her purple dress. I wasn’t really paying attention to what she was wearing during the Jubbly but this is nice and looks good on her.

  11. Christine says:

    “……..were the stuff of which the greatest theatrical minds could only dream of.”

    I can feel Shakespeare’s self loathing, from here, that he had a mind not rich enough to imagine the Great Jubbly of 2022.

    • SnoodleDumpling says:

      Man, Shakespeare would have had indoor fireworks that would bring the house down.