Angela Kelly has been evicted from the ‘grace & favor’ home she was ‘given’ by QEII

Angela Kelly was Queen Elizabeth II’s longtime dresser and companion. In the last years of QEII’s life, Angela Kelly moved into Windsor Castle and was right next door to QEII’s chambers. Kelly nurtured her closeness to QEII at the expense of everyone else – Kelly would openly leak stories about other royals and she famously smeared Harry and Meghan for years over the fact that Harry begged Kelly to simply allow Meghan to use a tiara for a hair trial before the wedding. Once QEII passed away, the new king and queen changed all of the locks and kicked Kelly out of the castle within a matter of like 48 hours. Then the other royals were shocked to learn that Angela had conned a spacious “grace and favor” home for herself on the Windsor estate, meaning she was going to have a free house on a royal estate in her retirement. There were rumors that King Charles would find a way to evict her, and it looks like he has:

Queen Elizabeth’s former right-hand woman Angela Kelly has been ‘cut off’ by the King and booted out of her grace-and-favour home in the shadow of Windsor Castle, MailOnline can reveal today. Ms Kelly, the late Queen’s dresser and confidante for more than 20 years, is being forced to move out from her Berkshire house, she has confirmed. Not only is she having to vacate the modest semi-detached cottage on the Windsor Estate, she revealed that her work-issue mobile phone has been cut off.

As she prepared for a new life in the Peak District, 180 miles away from Windsor, she was unusually candid this week on her public ‘Agenthighheels’ Instagram account.

Ms Kelly, 65, poignantly posted a picture of her garden, telling friends: ‘Getting ready to say goodbye. I am moving at last to my new home which I will be able to call My Home at last.’

In response to a friend, she posted: ‘I’m moving to the Peak District just further on than Sheffield so not too far away from the family. My work phone has been disconnected but hopefully you have this one…Looking forward to my New Adventures [with smiling emoji]’.

Her Instagram stories from this morning suggest she was defiant to the end. She posted: ‘I am too old to worry about who likes me and who dislikes me! I have more important things to do! If you love me – I love you! If you support me – I support you! If you hate me – I don’t care!’ She followed that with a Gif of a child chanting: ‘I can’t do negative today. Positive vibes, positive vibes!’

Friends of fiery Ms Kelly, the Liverpool docker’s daughter who became the Queen’s closest aide, feel she has been treated badly after such loyal and devoted service and say she has become another victim of the King’s ‘property merry-go-round’. Many in royal circles expected she would be granted accommodation for life after her decades of service to the late monarch.

She was recently recognised by King Charles in a special honours awards marking the death of the Queen. But eyebrows were raised when she only became a Commander of the Royal Victorian Order, rather than a Dame Commander as might have been expected.

But despite – or perhaps because of – Ms Kelly’s closeness to the Queen, some in the Royal Household were suspicious of her, and one insider suggested to the Mail on Sunday that perhaps ‘scores were being settled’. A source told the paper: ‘She’s been told she will soon have to move out. It’s a nice little place on the Windsor Estate and it was convenient for seeing her grandson, who was at college nearby. But the King has made it clear that under the new reign people will have to cut their cloth. The King is clearly not in the habit of providing homes for those no longer working for the monarchy.’

[From The Daily Mail]

As I said before, when the rumors began about Charles finding a way to evict Kelly, I’m on the Windsors’ side in this narrow circumstance. Their actions are entirely appropriate. Angela Kelly thought nothing of smearing a blood princess and leaking damaging information about the Windsors. She thought nothing of lording her “closeness” to QEII over everyone. She manipulated a doddering, senile old woman and that probably was only half of it. She conned QEII into “giving” her that house in Windsor too. Spare me – Kelly deserves a lot worse than this.

LOL – after this story got a lot of attention on Friday and Saturday, the palace put a rush on a clean-up piece in the Mail on Sunday in which sources claim that King Charles actually “bought” Angela’s new home for her but he did evict her from her Windsor cottage.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

62 Responses to “Angela Kelly has been evicted from the ‘grace & favor’ home she was ‘given’ by QEII”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Well Wisher says:

    ‘It is important to be nice to the people around you on your way up, because you will see them on your way down’.

    Angela Kelly either forgot this statement or maybe never heard of it. Pity.

    • PrincessOfWaffles says:

      Angela hated everybody and probably only guarded herself while gatekeeping everybody from QEII all those years. She was probably horrible to Camilla too that’s why her blood is being spilled now. But Angela’s not finished yet. She will leak the worse on circus main horse Camilla, until there is a fair settlement for her to shut up forever. AK47 did not work all those years to finish like this, the lady is a warrior.

    • Moxylady says:

      The only reason this is a bad move is this cretin will spill any and all beans to papers and publishers. Hahahaha Charles has no long game.

      • GOBO says:

        He bought her a house far, far away. There is no way it came without confidentiality strings attached.

  2. HamsterJam says:

    The largest landowner in Britain, solving homelessness by kicking people out of their homes one at a time…

    • Well Wisher says:

      Indeed.

    • Lorelei says:

      I cackled at the fact that he also suddenly had her cellphone disconnected. Charles is savage, lol.

      • The Recluse says:

        Pettier than Betty. That’s Chuck all right.
        And if he did buy the gatekeeper to the Queen a house, it was probably a pay off for her silence.

    • Lilacmaven says:

      Does she deserve what she got? Yes.

      Am I looking forward to the tell all panning Charles she’ll inevitably write as revenge? Yes.

      **grabs popcorn**

      Charles is so stupid. There is a reason they say keep your friends close, and your enemies closer. I imagine she got TONS of dirt on Charles, SideChick, and the Nonce,

  3. equality says:

    So he’ll buy her a house? His own son though? I really hope that PH is getting paid to attend the con or getting at least payback for FC or some type of letter of support for his security case.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      The house was her pay off – I wonder if she will write that book she was threatening to write now. Am sure that house came with an NDA. It was always on the cards that Chuck would not only cut her off but kick her ass to the curb – there were stories that he did not like how close she was to the Queen. Apparently he didn’t like how she’d always be hovering in the background when he went to visit his mother.

      Kelly was HATED by the family and the household – she was a known bully who was violent to other staff (there was a fight with another female staff member when the woman confronted Kelly over her affair with her husband).

    • aftershocks says:

      @Equality: “So he’ll buy her a house? His own son though?”

      We don’t know if it’s true that Chuck bought AK a house b/f kicking her out of her finagled Windsor estate property. Maybe it’s true.

      In the case of Harry, Chuck and his cohorts have attempted to claim that Chuck helped H&M purchase their Montecito estate. 🙄 Like so much involving Camz and C-Rex III, that sly claim is a lie.

      • equality says:

        He didn’t need to buy H&M a house. All he had to do was continue allowing them to lease the one they had in the UK to seem halfway decent. They were actually paying unlike AK.

    • Kathleen says:

      If it wasn’t for the Frogmore eviction, I would swear that Charles was exacting revenge on all of Harry’s enemies.

  4. ThatsNotOkay says:

    She deserved the boot. C&C Ruthless Factory are truly on one.

    I’m ThatsNotOkay, and I approve this spanking.

  5. FC says:

    Kind of love the message it sends to the other royal groupies — all the ass kissing and promises go out the window when the sovereign dies. Camilla’s kids better have a backup plan because Will is going to cut them loose so fast they’ll have to squat on the Middleton’s weed farm.

    • Snuffles says:

      Exactly. Just because Lizzie lived so damn, doesn’t mean monarchy support will last for everyone’s lifetime. And Charles won’t live that much longer, so sucking up to him is pointless. And William will probably be a thousand times worse than Charles.

      All royal and royal adjacent children best get their education and find their own careers and ways of making money because this gravy train is coming to an end sooner rather than later.

      • Tacky says:

        Charles could easily live another 20 years. The palace groupies will need to suck up to him and William just to be safe.

  6. Pinkosaurus says:

    I love this for Camzilla and Chuck. I hope she keeps leaking stories and remains a thorn in their sides. I love when terrible people feud. I also do not believe Charles purchased a house for her. He leaked that he helped M&H with their house purchase as well which was 100% a lie.

    • Well Wisher says:

      She probably signed an NDA in exchange for the new home.
      So no leaks.

    • ML says:

      Also here for the terrible people feud, Pinkosaurus. AK lacked the wherewithal to flatter the right people when she was still in a position to do so and instead was a nasty piece of eork. KC, who is hust as tone deaf, is not fulfilling the traditional role of providing for a loyal elderly servant. The reason he’s (supposedly?) paying for her next home is because people are complaining that he kicked the senior out.

    • Athena says:

      She worked for a company that promised housing when she retired so With a good lawyer she probably did get a house from Chuck but I’ll bet just like Edward’s title Chuck gets it back when Kelly dies.

      In her book that was out right before the pandemic Kelly made the Queen appear naive and gullible. She also allowed the Queen to appear disheveled in public. She doesn’t strike me as the type to take loving care of an elderly but the type to lord over them. So good riddance.

  7. Brassy Rebel says:

    Meh. She’ll be fine.

  8. Haylie says:

    I remember when tie papers let the public think Charles bought the Montecito house for Harry and Meghan.

    That too, was a lie.

  9. Gobo says:

    I imaging they basically paid her to eff off. I doubt they want to see her face ever again, or have her around trying to exert influence and score stories to sell to the papers.

  10. SarahCS says:

    Is there anyone in the family or their orbit who has the ability to plan more than 5 minutes into the future? How on earth did she think that there wouldn’t be knives out for her the minute Liz breathed her last?

    • MsIam says:

      I imagine she thought her “inside knowledge” bought her some leverage but alas, it looks like “nope”. She’s not like Prince Harry, I would bet that outside of royal watchers, most people have never heard of her. So I’m guessing Charles and Crocmilla don’t think she’s a threat.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      I think she thought that TQs wishes would be honoured and that she would have been mentioned in the will – neither has happened. Her arrogance was her downfall, she thought she was untouchable – whatever secrets she made have won’t see the light of day now as Chuck will sue her ass if she breaks her NDA – she only wrote those other books with TQs permission, no way Chuck/Cams is going to get her that kind of leeway.

      She’ll end up like Paul Burrell or that former RPO – a for hire talking (sh!t) mouth.

  11. Becks1 says:

    My guess is he basically paid her off and they’re saying he “bought her house” – like she got some sort of settlement for moving out (relatively) quietly and going into retirement. It was always obvious though that Charles and Camilla weren’t going to want her around.

  12. Amy Bee says:

    How is Charles buying a house for Angela Kelly but evicting Harry and Meghan from Frogmore? Make it make sense.

    • Lorelei says:

      Charles is going to Charles!

      • HamsterJam says:

        OMG this is the answer, remember the queens famous response to Diana?

        Something to the effect of, “I know, dearie, but we can’t do a thing with him”

        It is a system based on giving one spoiled kid everything and then denying any responsibility about how horrible he turns out to be while simultaneously thinking that this is god’s best plan

        It is basically the worlds largest social experiment gone wrong.

    • Shawna says:

      Because one can be bought off and the other can’t?

  13. JanetDR says:

    There’s “cut your cloth” again. It’s “Cut your coat according to your cloth”. Trust me, both my parents were raised during the depression and I heard it a lot 😃 I wonder if it is just one spokesperson who has it wrong, or if that shortened phrase is in general use?
    Also, it is no longer a surprise that a gift from the monarchy not only can personally cost you a lot, but can be yanked at any moment.

    • Amy T says:

      Angela should be grateful this is happening in the 21st century and gets to walk away with her head attached.

  14. girl_ninja says:

    She definitely took advantage of QEll and put Duchess Meghan through the ringer over that stupid tiara. I wish Meghan wore the Spencer crown offered to her. What a horrible woman.

  15. AmelieOriginal says:

    ha, I can’t feel sorry for this snake of a woman. She got what she deserved. I realize it’s because Charles hates her and not because she treated Harry and Meghan so poorly (but she probably did that to a lot of people and we didn’t hear about it) but I knew this would happen as soon as QEII died. I wondered if she ever thought long term about her future or if any of the Queen’s longtime employees did. They had to know the writing was on the wall when she was in her 90s. I would only feel sorry for them if they were truly good people but if any of the Queen’s aides around her were, we don’t ever hear about them. I’m not surprised that Charles kicked her to the curb immediately, he definitely cleaned house and got rid of anyone who was loyal to his mom as is his right as the new boss.

    Maybe she wasn’t surprised to be kicked out so soon after the Queen died but she had to be surprised to lose her grace and favor home. If Charles truly did buy her a house somewhere, that means she must have had some kind of written contract stipulating the end of her employment came with guaranteed housing for life. I wonder if he owns it and if that’s the case, maybe he was smart enough to have stipulations like “no leaking to the press or talking to the media” or she loses that house too? In any case, nobody feels sorry for her. She’s probably not invited to the Coronation either.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      She hasn’t been invited to the coronation – there was an article in the Fail a while back where she was complaining about it.

  16. Mary Pester says:

    And the story is, “here’s your 30 peices of silver now fk of out of our sight, and if you dare to write a single negative word about us, (Harry and Megan are OK as targets) we will fry your ass

  17. Mads says:

    Chuck and Cam are so petty and vindictive, settling scores and slights with glee only to discover it plays poorly in the PR game. Watching the Rota and commentators scrambling to change the narrative is tediously predictable.

    • Lorelei says:

      @Mads, it really is so funny how Charles is systematically pissing off all of the wrong people. Not inviting most of the aristos to the coronation, for starters. And now this— many of the people who adored his mother probably liked AK by extension since the Queen thought so highly of her, and this move will be seen as a slap in the face to the Queen, blatantly ignoring her dying wishes. These are the people whose support he needs! He is so obtuse.

  18. freddy says:

    She’s 65? Cool….

  19. Julia says:

    I well believe Kelly is a terrible person, but if she was given a G&F house for life, she’s owed a house (if not THAT house) for life. It was part of her pay, and no, it does not matter if the Queen was old and out of it when she made the offer. That’s the whole problem with royalty: they don’t HAVE to be smart, or savvy, or even sane. They just have to be the oldest child of the last monarch, and they hold that power for life (unless they give it up). If Charles wants us to pretend that he and his very ordinary family is somehow chosen by God to be the true rulers of the UK, then the least he can do is pretend to respect the decisions of the last monarch. After all, even at 90-whatever, she was just as qualified as he is to make royal decisions: i.e., not at all.

  20. Beverley says:

    Not shedding a tear for the old bat. Angela Kelly treated Meghan as if she was a cleaning woman. She couldn’t hide her contempt for the biracial duchess. Angela Kelly manufactured LIES about Meghan because her Black blood was such an affront to the old wanker. As far as I care, racists can go die screaming in a fire.

    I hope AK lives another 30 years in increasingly worse poverty. She richly deserves it.

  21. Flower says:

    She has no Royal or even Aristocratic connections, so she must have seen this coming and likely had an exit plan.

    Also I am sure Liz left her a little bag with which she can retire on.

    Going to guess she never got on with Camilla, which is why Chuckles discarded her as a matter of urgency.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      Its also telling that the changed the locks on ALL cupboards etc.. that she had keys to within 48hr of TQs passing. She had unrestricted access to the royal bling and there must have been fears she would have pulled a Paul Burrell and made of with some of it claiming TQ gave it to her. I would not have put it past her given how arrogant and entitled she is.

      • Flower says:

        Didn’t know that.

        They must have the Royal collection catalogued to the Nth degree – surely they wouldn’t be so stupid as to operate on blind trust ?

  22. Jaded says:

    “Many in royal circles expected she would be granted accommodation for life after her decades of service to the late monarch.”

    ORLY? Upchuck threw his own son and DIL out of their home. Why would he give AK47 a home for life?

  23. QuiteContrary says:

    I cannot muster even a shred of sympathy for her. Between AK and Toxic Tom, I have no f*cks to give.

  24. Elsa says:

    I am not a fan of this person or really anyone in the BRF. But I also don’t have a lot of strong feelings about them. I do, however, love M&H.

    However, I think it is cruel to boot out an old lady who served for a long time. If she has enough money and got her retirement, I’m fine. It just seem very old school, like Henry VIII OLD school to banish people etc. I don’t like the Toff type people anyway. As long as the working class are not getting their retirement taken away etc. this lady is probably just a rich old bat and I’m not up enough on details.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Eh. If housing (& a phone) are supplied as part of your job & you no longer have that job, it makes sense that you leave when you’ve quit/retired/moved on. If housing were part of your retirement package, that’s something else again. I would assume these people have hiring contracts, right? Nobody’s getting a salary & benefits based upon verbal agreements? So whatever her contract said is what she should get, whether Chuckie likes it or not, and whether Angela likes it or not.

  25. RubySlippers says:

    I think they still gave her what was promised; there was just no reason her house needed to be at Windsor close to them, and any job would cancel your work phone when you’re done. Bye bye!

  26. Nic919 says:

    The circumstances under which she was given a grace and favour home for her lifetime are sketchy and she’s 65 so she’s going to get a pension too. Why aren’t we hearing about the other people who worked for the Queen. Perhaps because they didn’t get a fraction of what Kelly got in the first place? No one else ever wrote a book like she did while still employed.

    This woman should have been fired when she was literally brawling with other co workers so anything she received from that point forward should be viewed as a bonus. The chances she was taking advantage of an elderly woman were very high and in this case it was correct to remove her access.
    Besides this was a job. The media is only writing this sympathetically because she was a huge source for all the nasty stories about H and M.

  27. Julianna says:

    The royal family have been notorious for years for paying their staff a low wage and then providing perks like ‘grace and favor’ accommodations when the staff retire. It used to be a method to keep staff on long term. Work all your life for a pittance if you are loyal to the royal family and be at their mercy at retirement – that’s a great business model.

    A February 22, 2023 article by the Robb Report “Working for the Royal Family Doesn’t Mean Royal Wages” makes for interesting reading about how low the pay is for many staff.

    Angela Kelly doesn’t appear to have any redeeming qualities. However, the royal family creates their own mess (like all the other messes they make….). Pay your staff low salaries (in a number of cases less than living wages) and expect loyalty. Duh!!!

    All while wearing millions of dollars in jewellery, owning multiples homes and castles, owning billions in real estate, hundreds of millions in jewels, squirreling away billions in hidden bank accounts, taking millions in bags of money for selling royal access and titles (looking at you Charles!)…. I’m sure this is only the tip of the iceberg. So when staff either get kicked to the curb or may see the writing on the wall when the power structure changes – I can understand why they might try to benefit themselves. I’m not suggesting it’s right but when everyone you work for is doing unethical and illegal things – people think it’s all ok.

    For the ‘source’ to say “But the King has made it clear that under the new reign people will have to cut their cloth”, as though they weren’t already working, is par for the course for the lazy, entitled grifters in the royal family – especially Charles, Camilla, William and Kate. Too bad the ‘Fab Four’ (the weathiest of the royal family grifters) have never had to ‘cut their cloth’. They are all entitled leeches!

  28. Rackel says:

    Charles is telling everyone to get paid upfront. So all of his people know squirrel money away.

    Then you have Philip will. If he has illegitimate kids do they know if they got anything.