People: Prince Harry ‘will not travel to London for the first day of his trial’ against NGN

Prince Harry’s trial against News Group Newspapers starts today. As we’ve seen in recent weeks, several “special” campaigns were prepared in advance of the trial, including the Vanity Fair cover story, which dropped like a bomb last Friday. There’s a high-level, multi-pronged campaign to smear Harry and his wife, to “force” them back to the UK, to disparage Harry as a henpecked man-child who doesn’t know his mind. In addition to all of this, Buckingham Palace has been briefing about Harry’s travel, security and hotel arrangements ahead of his trip to London for the trial. The British media indicated their belief that Harry would be in London this week for the first days of the trial, and perhaps even pop up in London today, where they prepared a million “King Charles and Prince William snub Harry” stories. Harry cut them off at the pass – the Sussex team went to People Mag with some information:

Prince Harry will not travel to London for the first day of his trial against Rupert Murdoch’s tabloid The Sun, refuting claims that he turned down an offer to stay at Buckingham Palace this week.

PEOPLE understands that Harry will not attend the first day of the NGN trial on Tuesday, Jan. 21, but is scheduled to testify in court in February, debunking false reports about supposed security offers.

The Duke of Sussex’s trial against News Group Newspapers (NGN), the publisher of The Sun, centers on allegations of unlawful information gathering by journalists and private investigators. Harry is set to testify later in the proceedings, which are taking place alongside former Labour MP Tom Watson. Harry has accused NGN of phone hacking and other privacy violations between 1996 and 2011, a period during which The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World allegedly targeted him. NGN has denied any wrongdoing.

The news refutes recent reports that Harry declined an invitation to stay at Buckingham Palace this week. A source reportedly told The Mirror that Harry was offered accommodation at the royal residence but chose to turn it down. It was also reported that he was set to be granted protection from the Metropolitan Police while attending the hearings.

[From People]

People didn’t get confirmation either way about Harry’s security, but Harry has known about his scheduled appearance in London to testify for a while now, so he would have been able to give the royal protection unit enough notice. That’s the current deal on Harry’s UK security – it’s decided on a case-by-case basis, and he has to give them 30-days notice, basically. It would be insane if the police/Ravec decided Harry didn’t need security for this highly publicized court appearance in London. As for Harry’s team telling People that he’s not going to London this week… that’s interesting, because I’m sure several briefings and hit pieces will be put on hold until he does arrive. But the wording on whether Harry turned down a room at the palace is a little bit weird – my guess is that Harry will be staying at a hotel, but that Charles didn’t offer Harry jacksh-t anyway.

Update: there’s a big commotion at the London court today, which I will cover separately!

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

6 Responses to “People: Prince Harry ‘will not travel to London for the first day of his trial’ against NGN”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Hypocrisy says:

    Of course BP didn’t offer him anything especially a place to stay, but they have no problem briefing lies through their propaganda rota. It is really disgusting how Prince Harry has been treated I hope he brings them all down.

    Also now I’m extremely curious about what’s happening at the courthouse 🫣

  2. Cassie says:

    They want settlement already . Hope Harry asks for apology and demands they leave Meghan out of their filthy mouths and let them live their life in peace .
    All being signed off legally .

  3. SussexWatcher says:

    I know he’s been there and back safely but I’d really prefer he do the entire thing virtually, if that was possible.

    As for the BP leaking, no surprise at all. Of course they ran straight to their media overlords to report Harry snubbed his shit father.

  4. Eurydice says:

    Oooh, a commotion. It’s like one of those Hallmark Mystery series – “Haley Blake: Commotion at the Courthouse.”

    I know people want H&M to clap back at every tabloid report, but I love it when Harry just does his thing and leaves the tabloids with egg on their faces.

  5. Kaa says:

    I’m a journo from Australia and we see this kind of thing all the time … if you challenge news they will go you. I’m amazed he’s actually pursuing this despite the odds. And I think more power to him. In bold terms,what they di d was WRONG. but from my experience down the arse end of the world they spend A LOT of time attacking. so from my point of view I hope he gets up. News corp are immense pieces of shit and are a blight on society in so many ways .

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Kaa, it certainly makes me wonder how much evidence there is about breaking into homes, placing listening devices and trackers on cars, destroying evidence. This case is much bigger than just the hacking, etc. I think that Murdoch doesn’t want all of the details out regarding the former PM and how they acquired information. Spying on the government at any level is truly despicable. My hope is that the cases go forward, but I’m not the one who would have to pay the legal fees for Murdoch if the amount is less than the settlement amount. We’ll see.