Lownie: Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew’s intimate secrets to foreign governments

For years, people have known that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell absolutely had a “client list.” Which is why it’s so bizarre that the Trump administration claims that the client list doesn’t exist. The actual debate (to my mind) is who actually ran the operation, because from what we’ve heard from the survivors of the Epstein-Maxwell trafficking scheme, it was Maxwell telling the girls where to go and what to do with high-profile or wealthy men. But I believe Epstein was the one who kept the kompromat, the videos and actual receipts, and he might have been the one passing on intelligence gleaned from his “clients.” Well, in Andrew Lowne’s new book about Prince Andrew, Lowne’s sources claim that Epstein actually did sell Andrew’s secrets to the Israeli, Libyan and Saudi governments.

Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew’s “most intimate secrets” to foreign intelligence agencies around the world, a new book has claimed. Compromising material on the Duke of York is alleged to have been passed to Israel’s Mossad, the Saudi Arabian authorities and the Libyan intelligence services under Colonel Gaddafi.

Details of the claims are made in a new book on the prince, by author Andrew Lownie, which describes how the royal was easy prey for a “rattlesnake” like Epstein. Victims of the US billionaire, who took his own life in 2019, have claimed for years that Epstein kept video recordings of his high-profile friends having sex with women. No proof of any recordings has ever been made public.

Lownie, in his new book, credits a documentary by the Canadian journalist Ian Halperin as the source of allegations that Epstein sold Andrew’s secrets to foreign agencies in the Middle East and Libya. The claims were “confirmed” to Halperin by “many in Andrew’s circle”, Lownie wrote. Halperin wrote about Epstein in his own book, Controversy: Sex, Lies and Dirty Money by the World’s Powerful Elite, which was published on Amazon in 2020. In his book, Halperin claims that he spoke to Epstein in 2001 and quotes the financier at length as he discussed the Duke of York and the rest of the royal family. Epstein is quoted as telling Halperin that he had met Queen Elizabeth and introduced Princess Diana to Dodi Fayed, among other eyebrow-raising claims.

Lownie told The Times that he didn’t “buy everything” in Halperin’s Epstein book, but added that the information he had put into his own book had been “verified”. He said: “The claim about the kompromat, I’ve got it from other sources.”

In his book Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, Lownie wrote that “other sources” alleged Epstein had Kremlin connections and may have been an “agent of influence” for Vladimir Putin. Epstein played Andrew, Lownie said. He wrote in his book: “The prince was a useful idiot who gave him respectability, access to political leaders and business opportunities. He found him easy to exploit.”

The book also quotes US businessman, and convicted fraudster, Steven Hoffenberg, who knew Epstein, as saying that Andrew was his “Super Bowl trophy” and Epstein planned to sell Andrew’s secrets to Mossad. Hoffenberg said: “Andrew had a weakness for the girls and fast life, Epstein provided that fantasy. Andrew would then give intelligence that Epstein would give to Israel. Andrew didn’t understand that he was being used.”

[From The Times]

Sure. As I’ve said before, I have no problem believing the worst of Prince Andrew and, for that matter, Epstein and Maxwell. This has long been the gossip/conspiracy about Epstein’s operation: that he provided girls to powerful men and gathered kompromat. That’s the conspiracy around Epstein and Trump’s relationship too, that Epstein and Trump shared the same proclivities and that Epstein had intelligence and evidence of Trump’s depravity, which he passed along/sold to foreign intelligence agencies. It would honestly explain a lot. And yes, I also believe that Andrew was a “useful idiot” being “run” by multiple governments and intelligence agencies. Epstein wasn’t the first nor the last to use Andrew’s oafish narcissism and depravity for his own means.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

20 Responses to “Lownie: Jeffrey Epstein sold Prince Andrew’s intimate secrets to foreign governments”

  1. Tessa says:

    The dod i faye d story is bogus. Mohammed faye d was friends with Diana s father.

    • Julia says:

      I’m not sure I buy anything in this book. I think the author just wanted a sensational read that would get him attention. Not that I think Andrew is a good guy but the author lacks credibility due to inserting the Sussexes in his book and the shady YouTubers and podcasters he has been associated with.

      • Blogger says:

        He’s trying his hardest though: Trust me! I have sources whom I don’t name but trust me!

      • sevenblue says:

        Yeah, I agree. All these crimes and the guy couldn’t find one person who would talk on record? As a “journalist”, he has no credibility with all these unnamed sources. Even the tabloids found a former maid willing to go on record about Andrew.

    • Jaded says:

      Yup, pure bullshite. Diana and Dodi first met at a polo match in 1986 when King Charles’ polo team played against his at Windsor Great Park. Ten years later papa Mohammed invited Diana and her sons to vacation with his family on his yacht in the south of France.

  2. Yup Epstein knew how to pick useful idiots that’s for sure and Andrew seems to be the biggest idiot (who also had great protection from his mother so when he became a problem he could not be killed) and was “a trophy”.

  3. Julie says:

    Although I’m willing to believe the worst of Andrew, anonymous sources and failing to submit receipts make any statement worthless.

    • Jaded says:

      The receipts are in the never-to-be-released Epstein files, and the anonymous sources must remain so because they’re afraid of losing their lives.

  4. Eurydice says:

    This ties in with the most recent stories about Andrew and the Chinese spy. At the same time, I wonder where British Intelligence was in all of this. Clueless? Or perhaps Andrew was a useful idiot for them, too.

  5. jais says:

    He’s not really saying anything that anyone hasn’t already imagined about Andrew and Epstein.

  6. TQ says:

    I mean this all tracks with what we know about Andrew, Epstein and kompromat. Epstein obviously used the kompromat for his own financial benefit, and I’d buy that he sold the info to intelligence agencies for cash and/or info. And if you extend the logic further, this all tracks with the Steel dossier contents on Trump about what he got up to with sex workers in Russia, how/why there’s video kompromat on Trump etc. This just all makes the fact that they transferred Maxwell to camp cupcake in Texas before her eventual pardon even more infuriating.

  7. MsIam says:

    Well the Epstein/Putin thing sounds credible and I bet that’s how Trump got tangled up with Putin and the other Russian “investors “. As for Andrew, what kind of info did they think he knew? Charles would have been a better target but maybe they felt they could get to him through Andrew? Maybe Charles, like William is the one MI5 or MI6 protect and Andrew was thrown to the wolves. The whole thing is ugly and they all belong in the pit.

  8. Maja says:

    I don’t believe that. Anyone who doesn’t even check the data and then simply spreads untruths about the Sussexes, I don’t believe anything. These people need to understand that denigrating and insulting the Sussexes is a seal of approval for the golden lemon. Many people then don’t buy such things or don’t buy them any more. The majority of people are normal and don’t want to be incited, lied to or taken for fools.

  9. martha says:

    This is why I think Harry’s team’s response to the book excerpts was a misstep.

    Much better to just have nothing to do with it. If he’s asked in an interview whether he got into fight with Andrew, he should just answer something like, “No, but I don’t want to talk about my uncle.” Just simple response.

    Let it go.

    RE Andrew – I see his value as purveyor of gossip that may compromise the English establishment, but I doubt the establishment would go to bat for Andrew himself

    • martha says:

      ETA I guess what I’m trying to say is that I can’t see value of kompromat on Andrew himself, but he’s a gossip and what/who he gossips about is the real value.

      Although – I suppose an enemy government could tell him they’re spilling what they know about him unless he entraps or records someone else.

      In some ways – it’s Andrew’s financial shady deals that are most compromising.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment