Texas biotech company claims they can bring dodos back in a few years


Many species of this planet have become extinct (thanks to a plethora of circumstances that all fall under the banner of “human activity”), but none has become more synonymous with the act of becoming obsolete than our gone but never forgotten fine-feathered friends, Raphus cucullatus. I refer, of course, to the dodo, those eccentric birds who used to lead happy, fruit-eating lives on Mauritius, an island east of Madagascar in the Indian Ocean. Then humans showed up, and invariably all dodos died out. If it wasn’t direct hunting that killed them, it was the destruction of habitat or predatory animals humans brought along with them that caused dodos to go the way of the dodo. But hey, remember two months ago when filmmaker Peter Jackson announced he was donating money and part of his ancient bone collection to help Texas biotech company Colossal bring back New Zealand’s long-extinct moa bird? Yeah, well guess which flightless bird those franken-scientists are turning to next…

First you take pigeon primordial ooze: Colossal Biosciences said on Wednesday it has succeeded in growing pigeon primordial germ cells, precursor cells to sperm and eggs, for the first time. This is a “pivotal step” in bringing back the dodo, which was a type of pigeon, for the first time in more than 300 years, according to Colossal. The Texas-based company, which has made splashy headlines for its plans to reestablish wooly mammoths and dire wolves, said it has also developed gene-edited chickens that will act as surrogates for the dodos. The chickens will be injected with primordial germ cells from Nicobar pigeons, the closest living relatives of dodos, which will in time, after gene edits to recreate the desired body and head shape, allow them to breed dodos.

Resurrected dodos in 5-7 years? “Rough ballpark, we think it’s still five to seven years out, but it’s not 20 years out,” Ben Lamm, Colossal’s chief executive, said about the timeline for the dodo’s return. Colossal is working with wildlife groups to identify safe, rat-free sites in Mauritius where the species could once again roam. “Our goal is to make enough dodos with enough genetic diversity engineered into them that we can put them back into the wild where they can truly thrive,” he said. “So we’re not looking to make two dodos, we’re looking to make thousands.”

Last seen in 1662: Dodos once plodded the forests of Mauritius, located in the Indian Ocean, without predators until humans started killing them in earnest, a process accelerated by European exploration and expansion. Habitat loss and introduced invasive species, such as macaques, pigs and rats that raided dodo nests, sealed the fate of the largely defenseless, fruit-eating bird. The last reliable sighting of a dodo came from a Dutch sailor, who described it as a “kind of very big goose” in 1662.

A scientific dissent: Rich Grenyer, a biologist at the University of Oxford, said de-extinction is a “dangerous” distraction and that gene-edited animals are “at best a sort of simulation, rather like those unnerving animated AI portraits of dead relatives we sometimes see people create”. “By labelling genetically engineered modern species as extinct ones brought back from the dead, if it takes off, it’s a huge moral hazard; a massive enabler for the activities that causes species to go extinct in the first place — habitat destruction, mass killing and anthropogenic climate change,” he said.

I really don’t care, do u? “These are dodos, and I’m sure there will be some people who say, ‘Oh, well, we don’t like them. We’re not going to call them dodos,’” Lamm said of the latest Colossal project. “Then don’t. We just don’t care, and the more you don’t call them a dodo, the more controversy you drive, the more my numbers go up. So that’s great. So whatever you want to call them, as long as you’re calling them something.”

[From The Guardian]

Chief executive Ben Lamm sounds like a real peach, doesn’t he? I also feel compelled to report that elsewhere in the article, the company’s scientific chief Beth Shapiro was noted for having a dodo tattoo on her arm. Yet together they’ve raised $555 million in four years specifically for Project Dodo. My reactions to this are largely in line with what I said about Project Moa back in July: is this the very best use of funding for scientific research (particularly when budgets are being decimated for initiatives related to non-extinct species), and for the love of Crichton, have these people never heard of Jurassic Park?? And now with this endeavor, Colossal may be de-extincting the dodo, but at the cost of killing the centuries-old idiom “go the way of the dodo.” The whole ethos of this company sounds bird-brained to me, but then I’m not currently valued at $10.3 billion. Who knows, maybe their efforts will set in motion a timeline in which the phrase evolves into “go the way of the human.”

Photos credit: McGill Library, The New York Public Library and Phil Hearing on Unsplash

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

16 Responses to “Texas biotech company claims they can bring dodos back in a few years”

  1. NoHope says:

    Shoot me.

    I don’t want to be around for this next chapter of human shenanigans.

  2. Steph says:

    I have to agree this is such a stupid waste of money. Where on earth have we successfully eradicated rats and mice once they’ve been introduced? Mauritius is still inhabited by humans. All this money to reintroduce a species without a solution for their initial extinction. Plus I see no mention of positive impact on anything: humans, other animals, the environment.

    Same goes for the woolly mammoth. Why would you reintroduce an ice age animal into a planet that’s not only no longer in an ice age but is on fact warming rapidly?!

    And for the love, stay the f out of the Nicobar and Andaman Islands! Risking the extinction of one of the oldest human populations on earth for some dumb sh*t!

  3. Lala11_7 says:

    Dumb ass White Supremacy will destroy US ALL…because THAT is EXACTLY what THIS is…White Supremacy playing stupid G-d like games🤬

    • Steph says:

      I left out “sounds about white” from my original comment bc I didn’t want to start anything. 😆 But it was definitely one of the first things to cross my mind.

    • SIde Eye says:

      I agree this is batsh*t crazy Lala11_7! Peak arrogance and God complex. They’re bringing wooly mammoths back to a warming planet! What could go wrong? Are dinosaurs gonna be next? “But my spoiled brat addicted to his iPhone kid has always wanted to see a T-Rex! Disney is so 2025!” -some idiot somewhere. Wtf is wrong with these people?

      They raised 555 million to bring back the Dodo. How many children starved this year again?

      This is all so infuriating. I am all for science and progress (curing cancer, vaccines, finding cures for diseases, etc.) this is beyond obnoxious. The genetically engineered species version of the fucking celebrity space flight.

      • BeanieBean says:

        That mammoth project really p*sses me off; how about we concentrate on our few remaining elephant herds? And rhinos, come to think of it. We don’t have the land capacity for anything larger any more, there are too many people now.

      • SIde Eye says:

        Exactly BeanBean! What a ridiculous plan. I can’t with this asshattery!

  4. Mightymolly says:

    “The dodo went the way of the dodo…” which is why I ❤️ you kismet!

    Can we get Jeff Goldblum’s oiled up chest to warn us off this?

  5. Lucky Charm says:

    I’m pretty sure the dodo has already been brought back and is running our government right now.

  6. Betsy says:

    Utterly pointless. The habitat in which the dodo once lived is destroyed, so this would live in… a zoo? A billionaire’s menagerie?

    I guess the only thing that could make this have a point to it is if the technology were used to resurrect birds and other animals that we have essentially slaughtered. I’m thinking of the many birds native to Hawaii that are extinct or nearly so, but that many conservationists are trying to preserve. If DNA from specimens could be used to restore recently extinct species, or to restore DNA to a herd maybe, but I sense that this is more about “look what I can do!” rather than anything useful.

    Insert shameless plug here for killing your lawn and replacing it with native perennial plants. Those of us who live in suburbia with our monoculture lawns (THE largest crop in the country, and the most pointless) are part of habitat destruction, but replacing your lawn or part of it with native perennials is a pretty simple thing we can actually do to help with habitat loss, species’ dwindling and global warming. (For real! Read just about any Doug Tallamy book for more info)

    • BeanieBean says:

      Exactly my thought every single time somebody mentions bringing back this or that critter. It makes zero sense, we no longer have the environment to support whatever it is & we’re not capable of reverse engineering the environment. At least the dodo is small; I know somebody else is talking about bringing back the mammoth–we can’t even keep our elephant herds alive! And that’s the biggest land animal we have! Mammoths are even bigger!!!

      I’d prefer to see more time & money & effort put into bringing animals that are close to the brink back into healthy numbers, such as the California Condor. That’s been an amazing success story, so far.

      Sorry, dodo, but…you haven’t really been missed.

  7. Henny Penny says:

    The planet is on fire, millions of children are starving, but, sure, spend millions and billions on bringing back extinct animals nobody is asking for instead of doing a single damned thing about the billions of suffering life forms that are already here. We are effing doomed.

  8. schmootc says:

    This sounds like a terrible idea, for all the reasons that dissenter and Kismet mentioned. Can we just not?

  9. Kay Hendricks says:

    Can’t resist saying there are enough dodos in Texas already.

  10. bisynaptic says:

    Where did they find all this money? And what will they do, if the bird goes extinct, again?

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment