A stalker came ‘within feet’ of Prince Harry during his September visit to the UK

Prince Harry was in the UK from September 8-11. On the 12th (and 13th, I think) he was in Ukraine, then he returned to the UK briefly, just long enough to fly out of Heathrow and get back to Montecito in time for his birthday. Harry’s September visit was widely regarded as a success – he was out and about, visiting charities and doing public appearances, all with his private security in tow. Some people theorized that King Charles “gave” Harry some royal protection for the visit, especially since Harry and Charles met at Clarence House. As it turns out, not so much. As it turns out, British police and the royal protection unit are perfectly fine leaving Harry unguarded, even though he’s in serious danger whenever he steps foot in the UK. Apparently, one of Harry’s stalkers came dangerously close to him TWICE in the UK.

A known stalker came within feet of the Duke of Sussex on two separate occasions during his recent visit to the UK, The Telegraph can reveal. The woman, who may be suffering from mental health issues, entered a “secure zone” at a central London hotel at which the Duke was attending the WellChild Awards on Sept 9.

Two days later, she was spotted within a stone’s throw of the Duke at the Centre for Blast Injury Studies in west London, security sources said. She is said to have previously followed him to Nigeria.A member the Duke’s private staff recognised the woman and “body-blocked” her to ensure that she could not get any closer, despite not knowing if she was carrying a weapon. There was no police presence at the event.

The woman is on a list of fixated individuals drawn up by a private intelligence company for the Duke’s personal protection team. She has a history of following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex all over the world and was seen during the couple’s visit to Abuja, Nigeria, last year. Scotland Yard declined to comment on the two incidents, stating that it did not discuss security arrangements.

The incidents are likely to be used by the Duke as proof of the risk he faces, and which is faced by those around him, as he continues to pursue the right to a full risk assessment of his security arrangements despite losing a legal challenge against the Government.

A friend said the Duke felt “enormous guilt” that his high profile put others around him at risk, citing it as one of the reasons why his visits to the UK are so infrequent.

“It should not be left to two office staff to act as extra eyes and ears or provide a physical barrier,” said the friend. “That should not happen. It is only going to take one motivated, lone individual for this to go south very quickly.”

The Duke has no right to guaranteed state-backed police protection when he visits the UK. Each visit is assessed on its merits by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec). The “bespoke” arrangement has so far resulted in the Duke receiving minimal or no police protection on most visits. Instead of the armed close protection he received as a working member of the Royal family, he has been assigned a liaison officer to contact if anything goes awry – a role police sources admitted was “a suit in an office” who is not security vetted. As such, should there be an incident, his private protection team can only call 999 and hope for a swift response.

[From The Telegraph]

I’ve known for some time that the British media, the British royal family and Britain’s police and royal protection service are all working in tandem to create situations in which harm comes to both Harry and Meghan. They’ve been doing this for years, even when the Sussexes lived in the UK. That’s why every time Harry visits the UK, the press tries to incite hatred and violent rage against him. That’s why Charles and his courtiers have facilitated this lack of police protection in the UK, and why they’ve begged foreign governments to provide zero protection for the Sussexes as well.

Photos courtesy of Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

54 Responses to “A stalker came ‘within feet’ of Prince Harry during his September visit to the UK”

  1. Tessa says:

    I wish he’d limit the trips over there. There are some derangers stalking. Charles let the hideous comments about the sussexes stay in the media and he could have stopped it years ago

  2. His beloved left behind family is in hopes that what happened to his mother will happen to him and they will facilitate it the best that they can!

  3. Jais says:

    It’s scary even for his hired security. They’re not allowed to be armed so they’re left to body check a known stalker. Jesus. RAVEC and the courts have refused to give Harry the right to a risk assessment. Anyone else would get one. They are treating him as subhuman. It feels like they purposely want something bad to happen to him. The Windsors and RAVEC and the courts and the BM are trash for this.

    • Tessa says:

      And Charles could put a stop to it. and give him the protection right away.

      • Jais says:

        Pretty sure Clive alderton is the rep for Charles on RAVEC so yeah. Not sure who is William’s rep right now. It was previously Simon case. In the wider article it says that Harry did give the requisite 30 day notice so RAVeC would have looked at his plans and said no to any security. The article also revealed that local police were stunned and uneasy by the fact that Harry didn’t have security beyond the two people traveling with him.

      • Beth says:

        Ian Patrick is William’s private secretary. The Palaces – BP and KP – have made a right mess of things after trying unsuccessfully to bring Harry to heel in 2020 by removing transition finance and security. Doubling down ain’t going to work much longer imo. And let’s not forget that Harry offered to pay but a judge said ‘no’.

      • Cara aponti says:

        Charles will be answering to his maker in the not too distant future going by his appearance. Evil man. Shame on him and Starmer for not providing security to Harry. Invictus 2027 should have NEVER been given to the UK.
        God keep Harry, Meghan and their children safe🙏🙏

    • bisynaptic says:

      Also stupid. They are mind-bogglingly stupid. The monarchy will not survive another Diana’s-death event.

      • Becks1 says:

        ESPECIALLY since Harry has been so open about his security needs and what the government is denying him. If something happens to him in the UK, the blame will be firmly on RAVEC’s shoulders (and that means on Charles’ shoulders, since he could guarantee him security.)

        The other thing is – if someone were to try to hurt harry, its likely someone else would be hurt in the process – security, a member of harry’s staff, a member of the public, etc. RAVEC is saying they dont care about that.

      • Magdalena says:

        It’s good that we know this, but the fact that the Telegraph feels comfortable putting the extent of Harry’s lack of protection out there using these words:

        “Instead of the armed close protection he received as a working member of the Royal family, he has been assigned a liaison officer to contact if anything goes awry – a role police sources admitted was “a suit in an office” who is not security vetted. As such, should there be an incident, his private protection team can only call 999 and hope for a swift response.”

        …especially that last sentence, seems like an extremely sinister way of providing a roadmap for any chancer, stalker or hired thug – or worse. They know what they are doing. And this “we can reveal…?” Hmm.

      • Christine says:

        Agreed, if anything happens to the Sussex family, it will be game over. I don’t understand how they can all be oblivious to that fact.

  4. MSJ says:

    Harry knows all of this and still wants to reconcile with his father. 🤦🏽‍♀️ It seems Harry has more love for his father than his father deserves.

    I pray that he remains safe always. 🙏

    The Windsors are a toxic dysfunctional ‘mafia’ family/institution that is willing to sacrifice their own for stepping outside to fold (marrying a biracial woman and refusing to accept abuse).

  5. Me at home says:

    Wait, this deranged woman flew to Nigeria to stalk him? Does she even live in London, or did she fly there, too?

    I’m surprised the conservative Telegraph even ran this article, though. Did Charles give them permission? I’d love for Charles to ask that evil Ravec to reconsider, but this is terrible Charles we’re talking about.

    • Beth says:

      And it doesn’t really matter if this woman is a hater or a fan – this highlights exposure due to lack of protective security/close protection. Where anything from anywhere from anyone could happen. And he’s either at risk all the time here in the UK or he’s not. He is and an RMB would prove it. That’s why he hasn’t had one. Utterly shameful.

  6. M says:

    How shameful that the security plan for the King’ son is “dial 999 and hope” just because he dared to leave them and have his own life. I so wish Harry would go non-contact and publish every last word he wrote about them. Burn it to the ground.

    • Hypocrisy says:

      I feel the same way.. his father and brother aren’t even hiding the fact that they want his life and his family’s lives to end like Princess Diana’s did.

  7. Harriet says:

    Eventhough he is offering to pay for armed security he shoulg get it free. This man has been on public display since he was hours old when, The Firm demanded that he be paraded outside of the hospital.

    He has never had a choice, he was publically paraded behind his mother’s coffin and then his father made him the Firm’s press whipping boy to “rehabilitate” his new wife. Now, Charles is blocking security it is so disgraceful.

    Just giving him a phone number to call in case of a crises… that shows that they still don’t want him in the country and are still trying to scare him into not to showing up. He really was safer in capital of war torn Ukraine, Nigeria and Columbia.

    Finally, the UK media is saying how much danger he is really in, this article shut down all the speculation as to why Meghan (with an H, the derangers spell her name Megan without an H… get it 😠) had no problem going to Paris but thinks the UK is too dangerous.

    Also, how did this stalker know about Nottingham? The only event that was preadvertised was Well Child? Is some one informing the loonies where and when he is in the UK?

  8. Steph says:

    I feel like we’ve known most of this for a while. The only new info to me was the frustration from individual PDs bc they have to make up for his lack of security.

    I’m a little confused about this stalker though. If she is known, why the hell isn’t she in jail? Stalking is a crime last I checked. Plus she breached a security zone in London. Isn’t that a crime too?

    • Hattie says:

      Who told her he was going to be in Nottingham? IIRC the only event preadvertised was the Well Child Awards.

      The first thing I thought of was that this is sounds so similar to the half-sister. These women are being “sponsored” to target and harass Meghan and Harry.

      The half sister didn’t lie about CG and her father… they just didn’t like her interrupting their plans as she went in blasting Meghan and they wanted to coax Meghan into contacting the father and now she won’t.

      The half sister was really upset that she was being left out 💰💰💰
      She wanted to be part of the scheme so she would be paid.

      It is clear what CG and TM are up to they said it in the article. CG will have assess to (or already had access to) TM storage containers containing all of Meghan’s childhood belongings and CG will write a book… if it is not already written (most likely). Like Charles, TM is on his last legs and CG was looking for an ending to her book… and the half sister messed up their plans.

      I predict a plethora of “insider” books coming out before the end of the year… before the DM court case. One of the named defendants PM already has his book writing about his “war” with H&M even though neither has ever mentioned his name. (Even I was surprised that he was not mentioned in Spare!!! Anyone, who doubts Harry’s acumen regarding his family and the UK press should be impressed.

      The tea and biscuits was a trap to lower Harry’s defences… but with this article it seems that he had already seen through that the rouse. I think his main goal is to get as much of this information published and available to the public. Whenever, the press says stupid things like “Why doesn’t Meghan come to London” he will answer succinctly.

      I think Meghan has enough “cover” to never speak to her father again… perhaps after the book is published she could send him a pre-made card With love, Meghan.

      Harry since his father… is king, has to at least publicy show he tried to reconcile. I don’t think he expected them to already try to enroll Archie in Eton.

  9. wendy says:

    has a history of following them all over the world? How often has she shown up? What does she do, just attend events? Send notes? Boil bunnies?

    That would be so unsettling to see the same face in the crowd…continents away.

  10. Laura D says:

    Don’t they realise how bad it would look if ANYTHING happened to Harry while he was in the UK? It’s not as if Harry has refused security – in fact it’s just the opposite. I really do think it’s time the government stepped in and granted Harry the security any other high profile individual would receive. The guy is the son of the king, is a known target and yet receives less security than Taylor Swift (no shade on Taylor) This on top of Meghan absolutely refusing to step foot in the UK but, feeling safe enough to visit Paris is not doing the UK’s image any good what so ever.

    • Hattie says:

      During the Ravec trial Harry found out that they had already summised that if something tragic happened to Harry and his family it didn’t matter because the public wouldn’t care.

      That is what he meant in the BBC interview that some wouldn’t mind if history repeated itself , like his mother.

      • ArtHistorian says:

        However, I think the public would care. He is very popular around the world, not to mention he’s the son of a beloved woman whose death almost brought the British monarchy to its knees. It seems they do not realise how they have revived suspicions about Diana’s death and the situation leading up to it by the way they treat Harry and Meghan. Reusing the Diana playbook on Harry and Meghan makes them look really really shady and revives doubt about Diana’s death almost 30 years after her death. These people are so damn stupid.

      • Laura D says:

        @Hattie – I know that’s what they think but, it doesn’t make it true. If history were to repeat itself over here in the UK then serious questions would be asked. Harry isn’t just a UK prince he’s a global personality who people genuinely like and respect. “They” might want put hide their heads in the sand but, Harry is still loved over here. The crowds still come out to see him. He still makes the front pages and news bulletins. “They” might not think he’s a big deal but, he is and at the risk of repeating myself if ANYTHING happened to him over here then it would a HUGE global embarrassment to the government of the day.

      • jais says:

        It’s like what do they base that assessment on, that the public wouldn’t care if Harry freaking died, along with his loyalty security? Are they basing it off the laughable yougov polls that says William and Kate are the bestest ever, polling from an aging group of old royalists and habitual tabloid readers? Which totally explains why William gets next to no crowds unless he’s in a tourist or shopping center while people show up overjoyed to see Harry. They have lost the plot.

      • Jay says:

        Well, this is also a family that didn’t realize the extent of worldwide public mourning for Diana for like a full week. They thought that paying off Virginia would make Andrew’s problems go away. They thought that the Sussexes would fail in California and also that Harry would come crawling back to the UK, eager to move back into his old role and apparently leaving his beloved family behind. So it’s just possible that they don’t have the best sense of the public’s moods, you know?

    • Amity says:

      The RF and their grey men really give me Emperor’s New Clothes vibes. Believing their own lies and the public with eyes and a brain are just laughing at them and they can’t understand.

  11. Julie says:

    Harry is aware of this. This is why even reconciliation with the father won’t bring his family in the UK. In Harry’s mind, he probably feels he did everything he can to get security and still, it didn’t work. He is not wasting time anymore.

    • Hattie says:

      Charles has been invited to the US for the 4th July. He can go to Monecito then to see his grandkids…

      It is doubtful because he never wanted to see them otherwise he would have never taken away the security and the house.

      How long do you think it will take for Charles to leak the photo of the kids. Harry corrected the photo description for a reason, especially with AI and Photoshop, god knows what pics they were about to conjure up. (I just saw an AI video of Diana with William and Harry as small children. Harry drops his ice cream on the ground and William steps up and says “You can have some of my ice cream Harry” and gives Harry some of his ice cream😱 I guess this is to counter the real videos of William as a child that have resurfaced on Twitter)

      Anyway, these pics must be burning a hole in his pocket. TM would have handed them over to CG after 2 seconds and asked for money.

  12. bisynaptic says:

    Disgraceful. I wonder who she is and whether she’s one of the ones we know monetizes the Sussex hatred.

    • Debbie says:

      Now THAT would be a good thing to investigate because if someone starts out spouting hate on the internet, then they go on to actually make a living off of it, then they graduate to showing up in person wherever the Sussexes are, then you know their situation is escalating. This is because first the person must pay careful attention to the Sussexes’ itinerary, and figure out a way to get closer to them…

  13. Slippers4life says:

    It is so sick and twisted that not only are they doing this, but that the British public seems completely complacent with all of it. I don’t understand, even if you aren’t on their side, surely you would not be cool with them being killed would you? This is a born Prince who fought for your country in Afghanistan twice! And let’s say it’s not Harry it’s Meghan and you don’t like Americans or whatever, do you want to see her killed on your soil? That quote last week “he’s paranoid and going to end up like his mother,” felt like a clear threat. Has humanity really sunk this low?

    • ArtHistorian says:

      I doubt that the most of the British public is aware of this. I know they are constantly in the tabloids but when I lived in the UK most people I came into contact with had no interest in the BRF and only knew the most superficial facts about them. I think it is only fans and haters who know the intricacies of Harry’s security case and the threats against him and his family, especially with the press misrepresenting the case and twisting the facts.

    • Holly says:

      I think its quite difficult for the average British person to feel that the UK is more dangerous than the land of guns, guns and more guns, where Harry has chosen to raise his children.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        Holly, the difference is that Harry’s security in the US is ARMED. As noted in the article, a private company is providing intelligence to Harry’s security team. In the UK, his security cannot be armed. That’s a huge difference.

      • MsIam says:

        @Holly a targeted assassination is totally different. That’s what Harry is facing. I wouldn’t go back to that situation either. He was asking for at least intelligence sharing on threats, which the government is refusing to provide. Evil, just plain evil.

  14. ParkRunMum says:

    that’s the standard fallback excuse proffered on behalf of the British public, like, we have bigger fish to fry, we barely pay attention, what are you on about…. And it always strike me like the routine sinister almost hilarious denials of any wider membership of a family where there is abuse. Like, a definite predator and a definite target / victim. I mean… you have to justify it 1,000 ways every day, in order to be cool with it. The public is a *huge* part of the problem. And it is absolutely worth asking why they are content to watch this screeching vindictive sadistic ghoulish obsession with hurting M&H and simply chuckle.

  15. Monika says:

    Imagine the phone call from Harry to this poor liaison officer who probably only works from
    9 am to 5 pm.

    Harry: ” I just have been stabbed by a crazy woman.”
    Liaison officer:” Ooops! Now you can apply for a review of your risk assessment, please supply all the necessary paperwork by the end of the month for the next RAVEC meeting.”

    What is wrong with this people? This so absurd and sinister.
    If anything happens to Harry on UK soil there will be an absolute outcry and as somebody else said I am not sure that the Monarchy would survive this. Harry made sure that nobody can pretend that they did not know about the risk to his and his family’s lives.

  16. GMH says:

    Meghan can travel safely outside of the UK because her security detail is armed. Harry can only get armed security from the police in the UK, hence his offer to cover the cost of the police expense. Since there is no option for private security to be armed, you will not see Meghan making appearances in the UK, and the pundits know this but ar pretending they do not. Truly vile.

  17. Amy Bee says:

    I guess something has to happen to Harry in the UK first for the Palace and police to agree that he needs security. Anybody who believes that RAVEC is independent is delusional.

    • sevenblue says:

      I don’t think so. If he gets attacked, the tabloids will lie and say it was a fake op done by Harry & Meghan to trick the public that he needs security. They did the same thing with NYC pap chase. I don’t believe Starmer has the balls to go against Murdoch or other british tabloids.

      • jais says:

        The way the BM and also the American media swiftly moved to gaslight everything that happened in nyc and made Harry and Meghan out to seem paranoid and dramatic has never sat right with me. NEVER. It’s why I continue to side-eye the f-ck out of Whoopi. I lived in nyc for 15 years and drove back to Brooklyn several nights a week from City College along the FDR. You can easily get up to very high speeds on that road at night and it twists and turns thorough some gnarly tunnels along the East River. So f-ck anyone who downplayed that.

      • sevenblue says:

        @jais, and they didn’t say sh*t when it was revealed in court how dangerous it was for H&M AND the public in NYC, so much so they increased the security level of H&M for their visits to NYC. Now, the tabloids are crying when they can’t get close to H&M when they are in NYC.

  18. dee says:

    This is terrifying. Does anyone know who she is or what she’s all about? TWICE in one trip, and the fact she’s willing to pay to follow him to Nigeria is terrifying.

  19. Mary Kidd says:

    In a weird way I can understand Willies hatred, sibling rivalry that boils down to hate has been around since Cain and Abel. But Charles? I have two children and can’t imagine the amount of hate this man has for his own offspring. I know it happens, but I can’t wrap my head around it.

  20. Connie says:

    Charles is a piece of 💩. If you hate the mother you hate her children. William is out of control because of Camilla. He knows Charles n Camilla disgusting history with his mom. I don’t think William wants to be king. He’s moving to a place where he can avoid the tsunami that’s coming.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment