Joel Edgerton claps back on James Cameron: ‘People are diving for scraps’

Have you watched Train Dreams on Netflix yet? I read a review of the film last week and I thought “nah, that sounds really depressing.” But the film is already appearing on several “best of 2025” must-watch lists, so I will give it a shot. Train Dreams stars Joel Edgerton, who is lowkey one of my favorite actors, quite honestly. I just wish he had a different career – it always feels like he could have been and should have been a much bigger actor and a genuine movie star. I strongly suspect that Edgerton has chosen his path carefully because he likes independent film and moving behind the camera. Anyway, given the hype for Train Dreams, it’s possible that Netflix puts some money into the film’s Oscar campaign, and maybe into an Oscar campaign for Edgerton. You know who will hate that? James Cameron, who recently blasted Netflix for their films’ Oscar-eligibility. Variety asked Edgerton about Cameron’s comments on Monday night, and he was extremely thoughtful about it.

While attending the 2025 Gotham Awards on Monday (December 1), where he presented the Best Director award to Jafar Panahi for It Was Just an Accident alongside Felicity Jones, Joel Edgerton shared his thoughts on what James Cameron said.

“Yes, I do,” he told Variety when asked if streaming films should qualify. “I think that… Look… none of us should be really squabbling with each other over what has a right to be seen or awarded or part of a conversation, I don’t think. There are some people who only get their chance because of streamers.”

“The world changed, I think, during COVID. Streamers became stronger. The tectonic plates have, the screening world shifted,” Joel continued. “I don’t necessarily think something should be seen as lesser than. I think the point that James is making is there should be a more robust fight for the survival for cinema, but I don’t think at the cost of saying that people whose only chance is to get their movie made on a streamer should not have a chance to also be seen and heard, or recognized.”

“People are diving for scraps and some people have had a long history where it makes it a bit easier for them, and they’re willing to fight harder and I really respect that,” he added. “James is one of the greats and he’s making movies on a big canvas. He’s a pioneer. He’s always been a pioneer. But independent filmmakers are kind of little birds in a nest fighting to be fed by their mother.”

“I’ve died on the hill of cinema a few times over a few issues as a producer and as a director and as an actor,” he said. “Every time I fought for it, a friend of mine once said to me, ‘How many of your favorite films did you actually watch at the cinema?’ And most of my favorite movies were made in the 70s and I was either a toddler, or 5, 6, 7, 8 years old. I didn’t get a chance to watch them until I was watching them on a VHS cassette on a sh-tty TV, and they’re still my favorite films. As long as people watch them, whether they’re at the cinema or not, is a massive, good conversation to have. And look, I would still semi-die on a hill for cinema. But I’m also a pragmatist.”

[From JustJared]

This is the correct opinion: you can celebrate cinema, theatrical runs and getting people to go back to the movies while at the same time, you can celebrate the streamers for providing tons of opportunities for independent filmmakers and lesser-known actors and artists. Edgerton even correctly gives Cameron his flowers for being a pioneer filmmaker (which is true). But Edgerton’s larger point is correct, that it’s not the end of the world that the streamers can have Oscar-eligible films now. It’s actually great for so many filmmakers.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

8 Responses to “Joel Edgerton claps back on James Cameron: ‘People are diving for scraps’”

  1. BlueSky says:

    I’m really tired of the gatekeepers and snobbery towards streaming. There are a lot of films that would never have been made if not for streaming. People like myself like to have options. I get wanting to get people to go to the theater but make something worthwhile that people want to spend money. I am very choosy about whether a movie is worth spending money or if I can wait. I like the luxury of watching something at home and pausing when I need to. There are also a lot of people who love going to the movies. JC always comes across as an arrogant and out of touch.

  2. SarahCS says:

    Yes to all of the above, make films and let people watch them.

    I’ve on my second annual membership to our local independent cinema group (with a gap between years one and two because there was nothing that inspired me early this year and it’s £££) and I’m really enjoying seeing as much as I can at the cinema, it’s such a luxury. Tonight is the new Knives Out.

    My request to Netflix is if there’s demand please keep things in the cinema, don’t pull them as soon as you’ve hit your qualifying period. We loved A House of Dynamite and reading other people’s reviews and comments I think part of that was being at the cinema and being totally immersed in the story.

  3. AwLady Rae says:

    I think the main problem with streamers is that they don’t put films in cinemas for very long only to qualify for Oscars which is very cynical. The Academy you shouldn’t allow it. I don’t think anyone has a problem with streamers making films though, it’s that they want to kill off cinemas.

  4. SarahMcK says:

    I love going to the movie theatre but it’s $150 if I want to go with my kids and have snacks. We go maybe once or twice a year. There is an independent theatre near our house that plays old movies or movies that have been out for a while and we’ll go there a little more.

  5. Lens says:

    I love Joel edgerton too. I only wish he was bigger so there would be more I could see him in. But I suspect he has quite the nice life being a busy working actor and not have to deal with the fame mess.

  6. manda says:

    So, I’m not sure I’ve ever seen him in anything, and I don’t know if I ever have really paid attention to him before, but I just watched some of that interview, and wow, he is a sexy man. That’s all

  7. Beech says:

    I watched Train Dreams on the big screen c/o a local film society. It’s a lovely film and a sad story but don’t be driven away as it’s well worth watching. Truly. A Joel Edgerton fan.

  8. lelly says:

    he is a really good actor and i like his intelligent response

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment