Prince Harry, Elton John, Elizabeth Hurley and several other plaintiffs finally had their day in court. Their lawsuit against the Mail/ANL has been a years-long ordeal, and the trial went on for more than two months. The trial concluded yesterday, and the judge will take his sweet time coming up with his judgment. Soon after the trial concluded, this story conveniently popped up. Some backstory: one of many arguments being made by the Mail is that their exclusives were not the result of private investigators, payoffs or blagging, but that many of their reporters genuinely had connections to Harry and/or they had royal sources or palace sources who were briefing them about Harry. The Mail’s Charlotte Griffiths claimed, under oath, that she partied with Prince Harry in 2011 and 2012, and that’s how she got certain exclusives and information about him. She also claimed that they followed each other on Facebook. Well, so now the British media magically has a cache of supposed messages between Griffiths and Harry.

The Duke of Sussex sent a stream of personal Facebook messages to a journalist, joking about drinking her under the table and “movie snuggles”. In conversations between December 2011 and January 2012, Prince Harry referred to Charlotte Griffiths, a Mail on Sunday reporter, as “sugar” and signed off with the word “mwah” and strings of kisses.

The messages were disclosed to the High Court as part of the Duke’s privacy claim against Associated Newspapers Limited, publisher of the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday. They suggested the pair were on closer terms than the Duke had indicated. He had told the court in January that he had only met Griffiths once, at a party, and “cut off contact” the next day as soon as he realised she was a journalist.

The 11-week trial ended on Tuesday, with the barristers making closing submissions to Mr Justice Nicklin, who will deliver his ruling at a later date.

The newly released messages appeared to show the Duke had previously struck up a friendship with the Mail on Sunday’s former diary editor. Griffiths, 40, now the paper’s editor at large, had told the High Court earlier in March that she had socialised in some of the same circles as the younger royals. She described how Prince Harry “friended” her on Facebook in 2011 and sent her his mobile number before they exchanged messages online. They both also attended an all-night party the following June and texted each other the next morning.

When the Duke gave evidence, he said he had “no idea” whether she moved in his social circles and insisted he had only met Griffiths once, at a party hosted by their mutual friend Arthur Landon. When he realised she was a journalist, he said he “had words” with his friend “and that was that”.

But the string of Facebook messages, seen in full for the first time, appears to suggest a slightly different story. The Duke sent the first message, on Dec 4, 2011, telling Griffiths: “It’s H,incase u were confused by name and picture!!! X.”

Griffiths, who at the time was the paper’s deputy diary editor, replied: “Hello Mr Mischief… Did you get home OK slash did you actually find your car and did you beat Arthur down the motorway more importantly?!” She added: “What a fun weekend of naughtiness – can’t we all get up to no good in the countryside every weeked damn it?? Smooches, CG String. Xxx”

The Duke replied that it was “without doubt the best of those weekends I’ve been to”. He added: “What a crowd. Never laughed so much in 24hrs!! Mr mischief? How do I get that title … l was surely no worse than anyone else!!”

He said he had “Serious withdraw symptoms still” but that he had been forced to “make polite conversation with strange people at a dinner last night.begging them for money for charity! Really fun.not.” The Duke told Griffiths: “Hope work isn’t too dull wherever u are?!”

Griffiths suggested a team reunion and referred to the lack of banter “on the group email front!”
Just over ten days later, on Dec 15, the Duke told the journalist she had “missed a good party last night”. Then on Jan 22, 2012, Griffiths replied, referring to the Duke as “H Bomb” and telling him: “We missed you so much at Arthur’s last week.”

The Duke responded: “I WISH I was there sugar but unfortunately stuck in Cornwall doing Army stuff 🙁 Otherwise I would have been there playing and then drinking u under the table,obvi!!”

He added: “Just wish I could have been there … especially now that you’re there! Dou ever work?!!…. Hope you’re really well Griff … Miss our movie snuggles!! I’m off comms all week incase u think I’m being rude,keep me posted xxx xxx xxx”.

Griffiths told the court that in June 2012, she and Prince Harry had both attended a house party hosted by Mr Landon, which she remembered because they thought it was “quite funny” that the Duke had stayed up all night before having to go to a Trooping the Colour event the next morning. Call data is said to show a call between the two at 2.50am, and three text messages exchanged between them the next morning.

[From The Telegraph]

I question every single part of this. Were these messages verified by the court, or were they released post-trial to the tabloids because they couldn’t be authenticated? While I don’t doubt that Harry has had private social media accounts for years, it also seems pretty likely that people could easily impersonate him online (especially in 2011/12). Did Griffiths actually turn these messages over to the court with some kind of verification that they actually happened, or has she just submitted a “transcript” of these alleged messages? Anyway, the way the British press has operated like a cartel around this case has been eye-opening, to say the least.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.