Suri Cruise was born three months ago and there’s not even a single picture of the tot covered up. She must have a vitamin D deficiency because considering all the paparrazi that follow Cruise and Holmes around she surely hasn’t seen the light of day.
Ted Casablanca of E! Online is saying that Tom and Katie are never going to get married and that the wedding plans are indefinitely on hold.
Defamer has a report from an eyewitness that observed a small baby-like bundle from afar that could have been Suri:
This is the first “eyewitness” report we’ve had on this baby, and it’s less than credible. We will sort of believe that the baby exits when we see it, but too much time has passed and we’re going to buy into one of the “conspiracy” theories soon. (It’s not a conspiracy if it’s true!)
Scientology has brainwashed Tom into thinking any kind of publicity for himself is good, but that his little baby, who would soften public opinion of him if she actually exists and is photographed, should be shielded from public view. They’re trying to keep him down and it’s working.
Here is Tom at a photocall in Tokyo for Mission Impossible III. Director JJ Abrams, Maggie Q, Tom Cruise, Keri Russell and producer Paula Wagner are also shown.
Morning Mess: The Paparazzi Crouch of Shame
• Sometimes it’s nice to sit back and reflect on the level of self-loathing one must feel after crouching all night near Jennifer Love Hewitt’s trash cans waiting for her to come out of the house without a bra…
I always knew they were not getting married! Tom wanted a baby, period. I think though that a baby was born and that there is a reason why they’re not showing her. As for shielding her from the photogs, it’s ridiculous, not after the embarrassing public spectacle he made out of Katie and their supposed “relationship”. I think that Suri is either having a problem that has to be repaired (but they have to wait for her to grow older) or she’s being subjected to some weird Scientology rite. Don’t forget he has a large enough property for the baby to be safely outside w/o being seen. Still, the fact that he didn’t show a single photo is weird, given how much he loves publicity. Also, I thought that he didn’t look like an overjoyed and overwhelmed father when she was born. His answers were repetitive and flat. He was faking excitement and it looked worse than couch-jumping, as if he was disappointed in some way.
I don’t think there’s any conspiracy; he’ll trot her out when he’s ready. From what I’ve read he’s an absolute and utter control freak; where’s Katie?, there hasn’t been a single candid of her alone since the birth (i.e. shopping) it’s like he trots her out every so often when it suits HIM .
p.s. If you don’t look too hard the photo of him and Kerri Russell it could be Tom and Nic in the good old days.
He would have been the one doing the casting, of the principals at least, so that leads me to wonder if he put the hard word on her; did she have to sleep with him to get the part (or some-one else which is worse)
You know John Travolta has a child that is autistic and they never allow that child to be photogrphed. Something to do with Scientology and not accepting children with disabilities or some silliness like that. They would never allow the child the medication it would need. Maybe there is a mental handicap that he is ashamed of. HMMMM
I’m wondering if the child has some kind of mild handicap too. I’ve seen pix of Jett (Travolta’s son) years ago, when he was little. He wasn’t shielding him so much and I remember seeing Ella as a baby too. Look at Leah Rimini, she did a spread for InStyle with her baby, when she was tiny, just a few weeks after birth. I wonder what’s going on here. I expected him to pull out a snapshot when he was on Letterman–many new moms and dads do it, w/o selling the photos to the papers. Letterman did it himself. I think it’s quite normal to show the baby w/o exploiting it.
I’m wondering if the child has some kind of mild handicap too. I’ve seen pix of Jett (Travolta’s son) years ago, when he was little. He wasn’t shielding him so much and I remember seeing Ella as a baby too. Look at Leah Rimini, she did a spread for InStyle with her baby, when she was tiny, just a few weeks after birth. I wonder what’s going on here. I expected him to pull out a snapshot when he was on Letterman–many new moms and dads do it, w/o selling the photos to the papers. Letterman did it himself. I think it’s quite normal to show the baby w/o exploiting it.
there is no baby…
I can’t remember off hand….but it was the norm that pics NOT be seen of celebrity children. I wish I could come up with some examples…but my brain eludes me now. I was kind of surprised that the celebs are allowing the public to see their babies…and my thought was that…they might as well allow a pic or two of the baby in a controlled setting rather than the absolute and dangerous pandemonium that would ensue should they be in public…mind you, that would happen anyway.
It is weird that he hasn’t been parading that poor child around like a lunatic after the way he has acted about everything else. But then again, when aren’t the things he does weird?
Just read that he gave Nicole a picture of Suri for her 39th birthday and signed it ” nappy birthday” This is either very tasteless or Nicoles pregnant
What if he’s waiting for Nicole’s wedding day to spring the kid on everyone?