Barack Obama says he wouldn’t do Access Hollywood interview again


Presumptive Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, his wife Michelle and their two daughters sat down with Maria Menounos of Access Hollywood for a quick interview that focused on their family life. Access Hollywood happened to be covering a birthday party for Obama’s older daughter, Malia, who turned 10 on the Fourth of July. Menounos described how the interview happened, and said she was just planning on covering the party, but that the family casually agreed to sit down with her for a quick interview.

The segment aired on Tuesday and is below. It was the first time Obama’s two daughters have spoken to the media. Both Malia, 10, and Natasha, 7, were given leeway by their parents to speak and they were super cute. Malia told a story about how she had to tell her dad not to shake hands when he met her friends because kids don’t shake hands. And little Natasha said her dad doesn’t like ice cream, but that he likes pie. She also said he doesn’t like fruity gum, he likes minty gum.

It’s clear that Michelle and Barack were comfortable having their girls on camera and that it didn’t occur to them that they were putting their daughters at harm in any way or that they had somehow made a poor decision about letting them speak to Menounos.

Yesterday pundits at the cable networks threw a huge stink, airing clips from the interview and questioning Obama’s decision to expose his daughters by putting them in front of the media. When questioned about it, Obama admitted he wouldn’t do it again given the fallout.

Menounos said that the Obamas were so easy going about the interview because they got the chance to get to know her first. The girls are also big Jonas brothers fans and were hoping to say something about them. It sounds like the girls showed up and inserted themselves into the interview and that their parents just accepted it and went with it:

Maria Menounos, the “Access Hollywood” reporter who conducted the interview, told MSNBC’s Dan Abrams Tuesday night while guesting on his show that that she only expected to be interviewing the couple.

“And I had time to hang out with them before. And it just became something where it was just that kind of a chill situation. And they just jumped into the interview. We had no idea.”

“….It was not something that they had told us was going to happen in any kind of way. We showed up that day. And they said, you know what, the girls really love The Jonas Brothers, and they`re kind of intrigued at the fact that we`re going to be doing this interview, they may want to say something at the end about The Jonas Brothers.

“And I said, hey, anything from the girls will be great, you know, wonderful. And the senator and his wife sat down, they were right next to each other, and all of the sudden after their miked and we`re about to go, the girls pop in.

“And Sasha sits in between. She like wedges her way in. And the senator goes, you look like you figured out where you want to sit….. So it just kind of happened. And I know that they may have discussed the possibility of it behind the scenes before, but it was not something that was intentional. When I first met the girls, they were very sweet but very shy and quiet.

“We had the whole day to kind of — not the whole day, but at least an hour before where a friend of mine who had traveled with me was taking them on a tour of the Mining Museum and had great rapport with them. And they kind of got comfortable with us. That`s just how it happened,” she said.

CBS’ Russ Mitchell, asking if the girls will be seen more, was told no by Obama on Wednesday.

“We had a unique situation in Montana where it was Malia’s birthday, and all of us, I think, got caught up in the festivities. And so they had a chance to be their adorable selves on TV, but generall y we’ve been very protective of them. And, you know, in retrospect, I think if you’d asked me, we probably wouldn’t have done it then, and we wouldn’t do it again.

While the Obama daughters have been on occasion campaigning with their folks for a year—they spent July 4, 2007 in Iowa—their parents have never put them in front of a microphone.

NBC’s Matt Lauer wondered if the Obamas made the right call in giving up some of their private life for the sake of exposure on the show.

“You know, I think that we got carried away in the moment. We were having a birthday party and everybody was laughing, and suddenly this thing cropped up. And I didn’t catch it quickly enough. And I was surprised by the attention it received as well.”

Would he do it over again?

“We wouldn’t do it again, and we won’t be doing it again.”

[From The Chicago Sun Times]

You understand how they’re campaigning as a family and aren’t always super careful with their daughters. They don’t see the need to be hyper vigilant, but the media sure reminded them. The ironic thing is that if there was any danger to Malia and Natasha by letting them speak on camera, the news channels made it much worse by focusing so much on that story.

Barack Obama’s family on Access Hollywood

And Here’s Access Hollywood’s coverage of the media’s attention to their interview.

Photo Credits: Obama is shown speaking to students in Taylor, MI on 6/17/08. Photos below are from Obama’s official Flickr. Header photo courtesy Access Hollywood.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

35 Responses to “Barack Obama says he wouldn’t do Access Hollywood interview again”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Trashaddict says:

    That’s not really fair to the Obamas. My daughter is in school with Malia and they have been much, much better than other political parents about not exposing their children to the media spotlight. When he was starting to look like a candidate, he showed up at a class potluck, nary a reporter in sight. I have to give them credit for that. Malia is a good, centered kid.

  2. headache says:

    I can’t remember how it’s spelled right now but I am more than certain that isn’t the way you spell pantene girl’s name.

  3. Scarlett says:

    i am impressed. the relaxed attitude makes them seem genuine to me for some reason.

  4. lunachick says:

    Modern day Camelot. I know we won’t see much of the children in the press going forward (if Michelle & Barack have their way) but it was great to see them for this brief interview. They could’ve said anything and derailed the Obama campaign in a moment, but Barack and Michelle were confident enough to go on camera with them, presumably unscripted.

    They’re clearly sweet, bright children and I can only aspire to raise my own as well.

    My best to all of them.

  5. geronimo says:

    🙄 If people want to see cynical motivation in something, they will. He’s hardly pimping his kids out to the media.

  6. kristin says:

    I don’t think the word “and” was mentioned enough in that article lol.

  7. MonicaBee says:

    I don’t understand why this is an issue, at all.

  8. michelle is a brilliant speaker, but com’on that singing was like who let the dog’s out, all in my ear. that was nasty.

    i can see why obama don’t want to do another interview like that again.

  9. CandyKay says:

    What well-raised children they are. Kudos to him and Michelle.

  10. snappyfish says:

    why is this an issue? Did JFK not use Caroline on Macaroni as a ‘prop’. John John peeking out from under the desk in oval office? Jimmy Carter asking Amy for her advice on nuclear proliferation.

    McCain and his family (adopted children and all) have been seen and have spoken to the media now and before.

    I thought they were lovely young ladies. These parents have done a nice job. They should be applauded for rearing well mannered and delightful girls.

  11. Bodhi says:

    CB, its Sasha not Natasha…

    And I agree with snappyfish 😀

  12. Kaiser/ Hippacrat says:

    I thought the interview was lovely, showcasing two beautiful, confident, intelligent, grounded kids. I think the stink from the MSM was that THEY didn’t get the interview.

  13. heehee says:

    Anything ot make someone look bad, they’ll throw it out there. Is that really necessary? And isn’t such an attack the very thing they are so ‘concerned’ that the Obamas would expose their children to… yet they are the ones attacking? INTERESTING.

  14. daisy424 says:

    JFK did that photo op when he was in the White House, not as a candidate. Jackie was away when that happened, she hated the press and didn’t want the children exposed like that.
    I thought the Obama kids seemed well adjusted. But I think it was for the publicity. In order to make him come across as less arrogant and target the blue collar voters he needs to win.

  15. Cinderella says:

    I don’t see the big deal. They are the parents and it’s their choice. I agree that there’s a jealousy factor among networks because any one of them would have loved to score that interview.

  16. PJ says:

    Apparently the birthday girl revealed she’s already planning how she’s going to redecorate her room in the White House! (This is according to Hello! magazine, a British publication)

    This is probably the real reason why the Obamas are taking their kids off the air.

    You never know what a child is going to blurt out to the media.

  17. Meredith says:

    What’s the big deal? They are intelligent young girls and weren’t being exposed or belittled. I have given up watching the news because of stupid shit like this; everything that anyone does or doesn’t do is under constant scrutiny. I can understand that their parents wouldn’t want personal details released by accident by the girls, but I am glad that they chose to sit down with Menounos. Love her!

  18. Lola says:

    This is blown out of proportion by the media as they never hesitate to do. I actually enjoyed the clips. They seem like a nice humble family. All the best to them.

  19. countrybabe says:

    Obama seemd to have a rough week last week altogether, this was just part of it.

    It seems like they sit down with anybody to do interviews, for pop exposure.

    Some other show might have been more appropriate other than this.
    Obama likes to use pop culture, yet he doesn’t want to come across as a celebrity.

    Obama was very uncomfortable in the interview, while Michelle was in her element.

    He should’ve taken the week off like everybody else.

  20. Ron says:

    The right just having nothing to go with now. They have tried playing every card here and nothing is sticking. Their canidate is older than Grandpa Moses and he’s runnning against a rock star. They are grasping at straws.

  21. McKenna says:

    I can’t believe this is even an issue. I agree with Ron, they are grasping at straws. If this is the most damaging thing they can think of to criticize him about, I think that says a lot. It was one little interview, it’s not like they are trapsing their kids all over the country to get the presidency.

  22. daisy424 says:

    Ron;What do you mean by grasping at straws?

  23. GoodScout says:

    Can we PLEASE stop focusing on the unimportant when there are so many issues that have to be addressed as our country goes down the FRIKKING DRAIN!

    When the pundit class starts giving Obama grief about something as meaningless as this, it proves to be they’re biased against him based on their long-term relationship with McSame.

  24. daisy424 says:

    YOUR bias is showing. 😐

  25. Kaiser/ Hippacrat says:

    I prefer to call him “McNasty” – his nickname at Annapolis.

    CB should do coverage on what McNasty calls his wife! Hint: Rhymes with “bollop” and “runt”…

  26. oxa says:

    If your kids are your main priority, do not run for president as that takes u away from them for far too long.

  27. Anastasia says:

    I don’t see what the big deal is, either. And the last sentence of this article is the best point. The news media making a big deal out of it is the weirdest part of it. No one would have even much noticed otherwise.

    Sheesh.

  28. moonunit says:

    Bodhi, it’s Natasha, her nickname is Sasha

  29. Shane says:

    I was very impressed with these kids.

    The parents have done a good job.

    I still don’t trust Michelle Obama yet though. But nice kids.

  30. drm says:

    Oh right, Michelle Obama is untrustworthy but her kids are GREAT because presumably her untrustworthy nature hasn’t tainted them…

    Great family, amazing man AND woman, nice, articulate kids…and a wonderful politician. The media has NOTHING to go on as far as negativity is concerned so they make garbage like this up.

    GO OBAMA GO and if he succeeds Michelle will have a hell of alot to do with that!

  31. Mairead says:

    So. The media are saying the children’s safety is now in danger because everyone knows that Obama is not allowed to shake the hands of their friends (the fuddy duddy), they like the Jonas Brothers and are privy to the innermost secrets of Obama’s chewing-gum eating habits. 😐

    Oh dear. It’s the apocalypse 🙄

  32. Bodhi says:

    Sasha as a nickname for Natasha? Thats really wierd

  33. dana says:

    this is hilarious! his opponents are really scraping the bottom of the barrel for “dirt”! it’s funny to see all these “intellegent” republicans and conservatives come up with the most asinine and plain out STUPID arguments for why Obama isnt the man for the job. makes me feel smarter everyday!

  34. Di says:

    Those girls are such little cutie pies. This is so cruel to attack their whole family in this way. Who cares of the kids are talking about ice cream. Can we get back to real issues like gas prices and the War?

  35. Man! Its such as you read my mind! You seem to understand so much regarding this, similar to you wrote the book in it or something. i believe that you just can do with some pictures to drive the content home a trifle, besides that, this is informative blog. A outstanding browse. unwell definitely come back again.