Heath Ledger Drug Probe Dropped; Mary-Kate won’t have to testify

asg-002579.jpg

Mary-Kate Olsen is off the hook. The pint-sized starlet had been subpoenaed by a grand jury to testify in the DEA’s investigation of Heath Ledger’s death. She had previously refused to say a word unless she was given full immunity – however you can’t do that with a grand jury. I think a lot of people were irked that she was being so stubborn, considering pretty much everyone else was reported to have cooperated very willingly with the investigation. On the other hand, she could easily have just had a super cautious lawyer.

Now it won’t matter at all, as the feds have called off the investigation entirely. And according to some sources, they botched it.

Federal prosecutors have decided not to pursue a criminal case into how Heath Ledger obtained the powerful painkillers that contributed to his overdose death this year, a law enforcement official said Wednesday.

Prosecutors in the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan had been overseeing a Drug Enforcement Administration probe into whether the painkillers found in Ledger’s system were obtained illegally. But the prosecutors have bowed out “because they don’t believe there’s a viable target,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because no charges have been filed.

The decision comes after recent reports that actress Mary-Kate Olsen was demanding immunity before answering questions about the startling death of her close friend and his drug use. Authorities say she was the first person called by a masseuse who found the 28-year-old “Dark Knight” actor’s lifeless body in his Manhattan apartment.

The DEA had obtained a subpoena that could have forced Olsen if she continued to hold out. But the subpoena, issued in April, is no longer valid because it was contingent upon prosecutors pursuing the case, the official said Wednesday. The official added that the case could still be revived if evidence of a crime emerges.

[From the Huffington Post]

You have to wonder who that “viable target” target was. It sounds like the investigation was pretty far reaching. TMZ has an interesting account from several anonymous sources. It’s TMZ, so you’ve got to take it with a grain of salt, but it sounds like their information could actually be legit.

Sources connected with the Heath Ledger investigation say the Drug Enforcement Administration set a new low for starf**king. People who have talked to TMZ off the record are now willing to go on record — still anonymously — about one of the most bizarre DEA power grabs ever.

How’s this for starters … no one we’ve spoken with connected with the case can point to a single DEA case where a massive investigation was launched over an accidental death in which no criminality was even hinted at.

We know the DEA went all over the country, in one case tracking down a guy in California who smoked a joint with Ledger in the ’90’s, telling him he had to testify in a Grand Jury probe. And how’s this for chutzpah … the DEA told the guy he would have to pay his own way to NYC to testify before the Grand Jury!

In another case, the DEA was nosing around a film set in Arizona looking for people who had information about possible Ledger drug connections.

[From TMZ]

There was also a lot of inter-agency rivalry between the NYPD and the DEA, according to TMZ. They claim the U.S. Attorney’s office was “appalled” by the “bogus” investigation, and basically shut it down as soon as they felt they could. So it probably didn’t have anything to do with Mary-Kate Olsen. Considering how quiet she is, I’m sure we’ll never know what she knows. And that’s pretty much the end of this case.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

11 Responses to “Heath Ledger Drug Probe Dropped; Mary-Kate won’t have to testify”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. gg says:

    Of course. Tolja.

  2. Mairead says:

    Hmm – possibly then Mary-Kate had heard the rumour that they were throwing the net really wide and either she or her lawyer was sensible enough to protect her rights. Quite right too say I.

    I mean seriously – a bloke who allegedly had a toke with the man in the 1990s? 🙄

    If this is true of course… 😉

  3. Anne says:

    I have a feeling MK couldn’t form a cohesive sentence for them anyway.

    The DEA was certainly grasping at straws though.

  4. czarina says:

    I hate to sound like a cynic (and spoil ms adamantia claus’s good opinion of me!!LOL), but government agencies aren’t always the “good guys”. Let’s face it–they had the subpeona since April. They knew perfectly well they had no case, but all this about MK accidently “leaked” to the media anyway?
    I wonder why.
    Thanks to all these carefully worded media reports about MK’s “immunity from prosecution”, etc., there has been all this suspicion directed at her.
    My question would be–who else that the DEA talked to ALSO requested immunity from prosecution? Was this standard for this type of inquiry? (and only made public in MK’s case to make her look guilty of something?)
    I find the whole media leak very suspicious. Especially when there was no court case being built and very likely anyone involved (from a law enforcement perspective) knew there would be no grand jury inquest.
    I’m just saying it smells very fishy to me!

  5. Snowblood says:

    I agree, Czarina.

    That header photograph of beautiful Heath Ledger is lovely to look at. He was so beautiful… 😥

  6. Aud says:

    I find myself agreeing with Czarina as well.

    However, if MK is in fact guilty, she’s famous! We all knew she’d get off the hook!

  7. rottenkitty says:

    Wow, where are all the people who were slagging Mary-Kate yesterday?

    C’mon.

    She killed him. Right? She’s a druggie. Right? If she wanted iummunity she MUST be guilty of SOMETHING. Right?

    Couldn’t be the DEA was on a massive fishing expedition. Couldn’t be they were getting off on interviewing starlets.

    Couldn’t be that the people in law-enforcement aren’t all tight-jawed Jack Bauer-types but are rather are just people. Full of the same prejudices and prone to being star-struck as the rest of us poor schmucks.

    Cheese and crackers.

  8. Ethan says:

    The public and especially Heath family deserves a real and complete explanation of her decision to send a bodyguard to “clean” the place.

    What was the nature of the back and forth with the masseuse and why didn’t she called an ambulance.

    It’s a shame these are the people that surrounded this young and talented man.

    He could have been saved and MK doesn’t even explains her “odd” decisions.

  9. Eric Agaki says:

    All I know is that Heath Ledger’s lost is a large one. I really think he was destined to do great things. Did anybody see “The Lords of Dogtown”? He was spectacular in that. He made the movie. I heard he was amazing in “The Dark Knight” and I am looking forward to seeing it. <a href=”http://www.hvinvestigatins.com”>private detective

  10. I reiterate, Heath’s loss is huge. I just saw the Dark Knight and he was equally amazing in that as he was in Lords of Dogtown. Check it out, it paints a great picture of Los Angeles.

  11. Felicia says:

    ok ppl she did it…she dated him 3 months before his death she wouldnt talk to the dea unless she was granted immunity why else would she do that. She’s guilty, plus she’s a druggie so where did he get the oxycontin and vicoden gee i wonder hmmm hey maybe Mary-kate duh