Angelina Jolie is wanted for a bizarre Mark Wahlberg comedy


I’ve been hearing about Angelina Jolie’s likely plans to do Maleficent for a while now. Jolie has even talked about the role – a retelling of Sleeping Beauty told through Maleficent’s POV – in various interviews over the past few months, and she seems vaguely attached to it. Tim Burton was going to direct it, but he dropped out for other projects, and now David O. Russell is attached as director. Russell spoke about his plans to work with Angelina a few nights ago:

“The Fighter” director David O. Russell is negotiating with Angelina Jolie to work together on several films. At the Ghetto Film School Spring Benefit Monday night at the Standard, where he was honored with an award, Russell said he was in talks to direct Jolie in “Maleficent,” a “Sleeping Beauty”-based Disney project.

Sources say Russell is a favorite to direct since Tim Burton dropped out in May. Russell is also speaking with Jolie about starring in “The Silver Linings Playbook,” a comedy with Mark Wahlberg.

Russell was also meeting with Robert De Niro about the project before he arrived at the benefit, where Melissa Leo and Blake Lively introduced him. Marisa Tomei, Anna Faris, Luis Guzman, Spike Jonze and CNN’s Soledad O’Brien and Alina Cho all attended the event, which raises money for the Bronx-based nonprofit’s scholarships and educational programs for young filmmakers.

[From Page Six]

A comedy with Mark Wahlberg? I could see Angelina and Mark working together, and I think they would be great together, but probably not on a comedy. Oooh, I just read a synopsis of the novel The Silver Linings Playbook. Would Angelina play the ex-wife or the mentally unstable stalker? Interesting.

Speaking of ex-wives and mentally unstable stalkers (too much?), Star Magazine has yet another Jennifer Aniston-versus-Angelina Jolie story this week. I found it eye-rollingly boring, considering it’s just an alleged rehash of Aniston “confronting” Angelina back in 2004. Here you go:

Jen and Angie had it out when Jen learned how close Angie was getting to hubby Brad Pitt, and realized her marriage was likely over!

Jennifer Aniston seems to have put up a fight when she learned then husband Brad Pitt was getting closer and closer to his Mr. & Mrs. Smith costar Angelina Jolie — and even called the actress to confront her! Star reports Jen called Angie to say her relationship with Brad was “inappropriate” as he was a married man. Angie, however, didn’t seem to care.

“She told Angelina to stay the hell away from her husband,” according to a source. Angie denied anything was going on but, as time would tell, that seems to have not been the case at all.

Jen seems to have also accepted her fate by that point. “She knew at that moment there was no going back — her marriage was over,” says the source.

[From Hollywood Life]

Oh, POOR JEN. Except that she did the same thing to Justin Theroux’s girlfriend of 14 years. I hope Heidi Bivens gets a naked Vanity Fair cover and throws a huge public pity party. I hope that six years from now, we’re hearing still about Heidi confronting Aniston and telling her to stay the hell away from her boyfriend. It would be a small justice.



Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

74 Responses to “Angelina Jolie is wanted for a bizarre Mark Wahlberg comedy”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Regina Phalange says:

    I don’t think it’s the same situation with Justin and Jen as it was for Brange. Brad was married–Justin was not.

  2. vanessa says:

    Agreed. Although it was shady, there was no ring on it. I’ve always thought unmarried men were open game. unless they are engaged or married, don’t mess with those men. Obviously he wasn’t very in love or happy with his girlfriend or he wouldn’t have been so easy to snatch. On that note, it’s both their fault! And Aniston better watch out for any other girl since he’s easy to steal.

  3. LeeA says:

    They were together 14 years — double the time Brad and Jennifer were together. Technically is was a common law marriage. Plus, Jennifer was publically dating Justin while Heidi was still living with him!!!

  4. Reality says:

    Sure she’ll get a Vanity Fair cover. What’s her name again? And I agree there’s a difference when you’re married, or else what’s the whole point of saying your vows? It still sucks, but it’s not the same.

    Anywho, I predict more crazy comments rehashing the same tired shit…

  5. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    I would love to see Angie in a comedy. I am little disappointed Angie won’t be directed by Tim Burton but maybe they will find another project together. Would love to see Angie work with Mark Walhberg interesting pairing that would be. Super excited to see Angie in more movies.

    Can I make a little plea? I think its sooo ridiculous we keep trudging up this triangle nonsense and “who cheated on who” or “who messed around with who” or ” the timeline plays out like this”. Like neither side is winning IMO…in terms of this fight. No one seems to be giving in and I have seen this same “who cheated on who” argument played out in comment sections since 2005 on a few different sites I used to frequent and neither side EVER gives. Now the tabloids can continue to trudge through this crap but it doesn’t change the present. Brad and Angelina are together, have children, have built a charity foundation together, and are possibly discussing marriage. Jen is doing whatever the hell she does and is not with Brad, no revelations from the past will change that.

  6. wyatt says:

    billy bob wasnt married,but it has not stop the gossiping about angelina STOLE him from laura dern.

  7. lisa says:

    OH please who cares.. Brad/Angie are together for almost 7 years. I doubt they even think about or care about some fake triangle.

    Can you see Aniston calling Angie to “confront” her. Really. She likes to talk in her interviews or through her “friends”. I think if she had called or talked to Angie woman to woman this shit would have been over. When Angelina did her 2007 Vogue interview the guy asked her if she had spoken to Aniston. Mind you Angelina never brought up Jennifer at all, but she said it would be up to Aniston and she (Angelina) would welcome it. I bring this up because Aniston said in an interview that she had bought that particular Vogue issue in 2007 to read it because she wanted to see what the fuss was all about. She then had many other interviews in print and live, YET she never talked about the fact that she had already read the issue and Angie’s statements. But she waited for 2 years to make a comment on that interview. 2 years. And she didn’t even make the Uncool comment during her interview.. She waited a full 7 days then called the guy and gave her famous “What Angie did was Uncool”… man she sure likes to let thing brew for a long time.

    Her interview where she said that, makes it seem like she was again blindsided, which she was not EVER because she had already read the interview 2 year prior. And she was not blindsided because according to her BFF she knew Brad had an attraction and had not acted on it and had been honest. I think her Bff was in on her feelings. I mean How else would Courteneny have known what Brad had told Aniston in a private moment.

    Look she has a new guy. I hope it works and last a looooonnnngg time. Hope her fans celebrate it and leave Brad and Angie out of her crazy shit. But of course the tabloids can’t let the JPs go. I notice to that if Jennifer has a story that is not related to the jps it is a sidebar. but put Angie/Brad in it then it gets a cover. Someone is buying those issues. And as a JP fan I can say that we sure as hell are not.

  8. mln76 says:

    David O Russell hinted to Vulture that SLP wasn’t likely to star Angie but that he may be interested in directing Maleficent. I loved Russell’s movies personally I think ‘The Fighter’ should have won Best Picture but he’s supposed to be a major A-hole so we’ll see what happens.

    As for Aniston…she’s got her prize and he’s not a one woman man by a long shot. I hope for Jen’s sake she isn’t really serious about him because he’s got the same kind of douche vibe that Jesse James has. And I don’t think I could stand another decade long pity party from Jen and her hens.

  9. constance says:

    Living together doesn’t always mean you are still together as a functioning, loving couple. They don’t have any children together, that I’ve heard of.

    No ring, no family, no marriage = still trolling

  10. Julie says:

    Boy the pro-Angie, Jen-bashing consistency here gets old. Both situations were wrong, but I just get a strong sense if Angie & Jenn were reversed, Angie would get alot different treatment. Personally, I don’t care for either but the bias of one over the other gets tiring and lessens your credibility.

  11. lisa says:

    I should focus on the part about Angie and this role. she is working on Producing Roosevelt and Churchill. I love that she is doing more things behind the camera. Not many actresses have that opportunity. I hope Sir Anthony will be able to be her Churchill.

    She spoke about a script she was reading in an interview when promoting TT; she talked about it being a comedy of sorts, that the character was a bit off beat. So when I read that I was waiting to see what it was. Maybe this is it. Not sure. But I like that she seems to be dipping her toes in various waters. Nice to grow and try new things. She does have a cute personality. Watch her in lighter interviews and you can see it. I just hate that when she is interviewed that the person has to get all serious and deep. They all act like they are interviewing the President. I think she gets tired of it too. They all need to lighten up. The interviews for KFP 2 with Jack/Dustin were super cute and fun.

    That is the Angie her fans know and love.

  12. mln76 says:

    @constance the same can be said for being married. I know alot of people who took several years to formally separate/divorce from their hubbies eventhough they both felt free to date other people. In fact I have a co-worker who’s been married but separated longer than she was actually married and living with her hubby. A piece of paper doesn’t actually guarantee love.

  13. Tink says:

    I LOVE that colour on Angie!

  14. Leigh says:

    Constance #9

    “Living together doesn’t always mean you are still together as a functioning, loving couple. They don’t have any children together, that I’ve heard of. ” Same could be said of brad & jennifer’s last years of marriage

  15. Sam says:

    Hmm, I see all this “It’s not the same, they didn’t put a ring on it” comments, except that Justin and his girlfriend were together far longer than Brad and Jen. I know they weren’t married, but seriously after 14 years, might as well have been.

  16. little girl lost says:

    a ring does not a marriage make.

  17. Sakyiwaa says:

    @wyatt. totally got that right…

    oh, to be a fly on the wall in Jen’s PR office!

  18. Sakyiwaa says:

    all the emotions and denials….

    Countless reasonable statements… Rumor Has It that Love Happens and when it does, there must be some kind of Management of the situation by The Good Girl. Heidi should’ve known after 14 years and no marriage; He’s just not into You.

    Man, see how the tables have turned…!
    Jennifer played a character something like Heidi
    in that movie too… With Affleck not wanting to marry her for the longest time… but it didn’t mean he wasn’t into her… in the movie.

    Real bummer…

    Confirmation of an ACTUAL relationship still needed though! :) I’m a logical person.

  19. Cheyenne says:

    vanessa: Obviously he wasn’t very in love or happy with his girlfriend or he wouldn’t have been so easy to snatch.

    Which could also be said of Brad Pitt and his ex-wife.

  20. thesea says:

    Brad and Angie are still trolling.

  21. Sakyiwaa says:

    Yay! i love Angie movie news.

    Okay, AJ in a comedy… even she might laugh at that a little. she said she doesn’t think she has any kind of comedic ability. Though, I did kinda laugh in MAMS during that scene at the fair where she made the perfect shots and won the huge teddy and said it was “Beginners’ Luck” when John asked “Where did you learn to shoot like that?” Her facial expressions in that scene were priceless…
    I laughed a couple of times in the Tourist too. haha.

    Well, Mark Wahlberg is funny enough… for real. I love him too. we’ll see how this pans out then…

  22. nnn says:

    Living together doesn’t always mean you are still together as a functioning, loving couple.
    Exactly and THAT applied also to many married couples !

    You will never beleive the number of people who are married and haven’t sleep together for years, though they live under the same room but sleep separately.

    And as for the jen fans beeitteling when they are not dismissing unmarried couples granted them as less worth and being fair games to be cheated on because it’s not really cheating, i hope you don’t raise your teenagers into thinking that they can sleep left and right even when they are a couple, because hey it’s not cheating since it’s not within the marriage institution.

    I find this whole ideology terribly insulting to unmarried couples, immoral and irresponsible.

    It’s also a strong signal to all the sleazebags, immoral men, Tiger Woods and Jessy James serial daters who will date jen and cheat on her, since she is also fair game to be cheated on and to live under the free sex between singles NEW rule of some Jen fans.

    Now concerning this thread, i don’t like the idea of the comedy with Angie and Whalberg. An action movie, yes, a dram , yes but not a comedy. I prefer someone like Carrel.

  23. Chloe says:

    I think I’m gonna go and scream at the ocean now.

  24. thesea says:

    Insulting unmarried couples is immoral? I thought morality was immoral.

  25. Crash says:

    I’m tired of it always being the woman’s fault. It was Angie’s “fault”. she stole Brad. Now it’s gonna be Jennifer’s “fault”. She’s stealing Justin. WHAT ABOUT THE MEN? It takes two!!

    P.S. It’s still Angie’s fault, though. If she hadn’t stolen Brad he would still be with Jen and Jen wouldn’t have had to steal Justin. See? (just kidding all you triangle crazies:)

  26. olivia says:

    Jolie isn’t comedy actress. “Life or something like this” anyone?

    Anyway Kaiser, apparently Skarsgard is in new Vogue. Can you write about that?Pretty please. I swear that I will not say bad words about Jolie for a month :)

  27. Sakyiwaa says:

    Am I lonely? Upset? Confused? Yes…
    But I am a tough cookie…
    I never said I didn’t want to have children. I did and I do.
    Jen Finally Talks. And Talks and Talks. And Cries. And Talks.


    Was I blindsided? Surprised? Still in love with him after 14 years? Yes.
    But I’m a tough cookie…
    I never said I didn’t want to get married. I did.
    Heidi Finally Talks. And Talks and Talks. And Cries. And Talks.

    Your call, Vanity Fair…

  28. Sakyiwaa says:

    @olivia. lol! How about you won’t say bad words about Jolie forever…
    for a lovely Skarsgard post. haha!
    i know… i’m pushing it.

    gosh, these threads are getting to be like my personal playground these days. i love this site. lol! Peace out.

  29. christie says:

    I actually like the idea of Angie in a comedy. Definitely not a traditional romcom but more of a dark comedy.

    On the other subject, I don’t understand the comments saying that the Jen situation is different since he wasn’t married and that Heidi should have known that since he hadn’t married her after 14 years, she should have seen this coming.
    To give another celeb couple as an example, Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell have been together for over 20 years – unmarried – and I think that he’s still very much into her.

  30. Mary says:

    How can you be such a Brangeloonie?! LoL.
    You know, maybe, after all, Jennifer has learned something from Angelina… “Go for it as a tracktor not caring if he has a wife or a official long term girlfriend” (would you like her then? I tend to think that if Angelina did it, oh, then it’s okay!)
    maybe, she is still a poor lady that din’t know her new man was still with his girlfriend or whatever… (as you also pointed out as being a possibility)

  31. Rose says:

    @Constance, living together doesn’t always mean you are still together as a functioning loving couple. CC said that Brad had told JA that he was attracted to Angelina, she was not blindsided in any way. Brad wanted children, she did not. He found someone who wanted the same things in life that he wanted, end of marriage. Remember when Brad got with Angelina he was about 40 yo. How much longer should he wait to have his wishes come through.

  32. someone says:

    I think it was mostly Brad fault with Angie..and I think if Justin was in a committed relationship, then its his fault..I also heard that he and his long time girlfriend haven’t been together as a couple since March..who knows anything for sure…I don’t even know if he and Jen are together, seen no proof, only innuendo!

  33. Mrs. Odie 2 says:

    Maybe Jennifer did this, maybe she didn’t. But Wahlberg DID attack and blind a man he stole a six pack of beer from. I will never watch anything that brute does.

  34. Eve says:

    @ Sakyiwaa:

    Was I blindsided? Surprised? Still in love with him after 14 years? Yes.
    But I’m a tough cookie…
    I never said I didn’t want to get married. I did.
    Heidi Finally Talks. And Talks and Talks. And Cries. And Talks.

    Your call, Vanity Fair…


  35. Hanh says:

    14 years together is a LONG TIME, longer than most marriages. They were living together when JA started dating him. Jen will never let the Angie-Jen thing go because this is HUGE publicity for her. Her dating life and her “feud” are the only things media talks about and she needs it to publicize her movies and continue her career.

  36. Jag says:

    Just want to point out that certain places would consider 14 years of cohabitation and relationship a common-law marriage. It’s not like he was dating her for a few months; this was over a decade, so he should’ve been off-limits, too.

    I don’t see Jolie or Wahlberg doing a comedy together with any success.

  37. Whatever says:

    What in the world does the Jen story from 200andfreaking4 have to do with Angelina possibly doing a comedy???? Nothing. And a picture and headline from 2005. *Yawn*

    I like Angelina in action/drama movies, but comedy doesn’t seem to be her thing. I’d still watch it on demand or HBO.

  38. Kim123 says:

    Someone- there are pics of Heidi and Justin together on April 5 at the screening and afterparty for Magnolia Pictures Celebrity I think its more telling that JA’s publicist has not issued a denial since this “homewrecker” story broke. He issues denials on a regular basis within hour of a tabloid story such as Jen is not adopting from Mexico, Jennifer is not pregnant,Jennifer did not have a secret meeting with Brad. If he can make a statement about a dog that died weeks b4 he can say JA was in no way involved in the breakup of Justin and his GF’s relationship.He can say JA and JT are not dating.The silence is very telling.Why let this false story go unchallenged- JMO

  39. Kim says:

    She would physically make a great Malificent.

  40. thesea says:

    She would spiritually make a great Malificent.

  41. truthSF says:

    The silence is very telling.Why let this false story go unchallenged- JMO

    A brilliant PR like Huvane will wait until just the right time, like HB publicity tour to acknowledge this story.
    I mean, the girl needs something/anything to sell herself now-a-days. And it seems faking a homewrecker/new boyfriend story is perfect for her.

  42. Kim123 says:

    TruthSF- Us Weekly is claiming Justin has moved into Jen’s place while he is in LA.Do you think Huvane is going to ignore that one too? He loves making denials to US Weekly.I know he ignored the People magazine story about her introducing her new “man” to her friends. Well- we will see .I may check online later. Have a nice day.

  43. kasper says:

    Let’s see, how will the angeloonies respond: “bla bla bla hater bla bla hate haters bla bla bla bla bla st. Angie bla bla facts bla bla bla ignorance bla haters suck bla bla bla Angie please acknowledge me your divoted servant sychophant and professional ass-lick. “

  44. vanessa says:

    I’m saying that it’s his fault as well. He was obviously in a committed relationship and should have stopped any kind of dinner dates or talking on the phone. Him and his girlfriend were together for 14 years, and he obviously wasn’t into her anymore if all it takes is a pretty woman to steal him away. Goldie and Kurt are a completely different couple, they have children, grandchildren, a complete family. That kind of man is off limits. If a man or woman is in a 10 plus year relationship with no kids, and no intentions of getting married, then he is fair game in some women’s eyes. Jennifer Aniston is not a homewrecker because there was no home to wreck. Brad and Jen were married and supposedly knew their marriage was over while he was filming with Angie. Angie isn’t a homewrecker to me, Brad was a skank and jumped ship because the grass looked greener on the other side. Same thing with Justin.

  45. thesea says:

    My mom taught me about people who use the word hate – you see the world as you are

  46. futureperfect says:

    @kasper, it’s dEvotes. If you’re going to be on the money honey, cross your T’s, dot your I’s , etc. Nevertheless, there is something about these threads that makes for good material for a study of mass fascism and mob mentality. Don’t knock an inadvertent gift horse!

    @thesea, good point. Please copy and paste when it inevitably recurs.

  47. futureperfect says:

    The only thing potentially humorous about an Angelina Jolie-led comedy is Angelina attempting to assume the role of a comedic actor. She looks good… when she’s not painfully thin… but she can’t act for shit. Bla bla bla Oscar-winner, bla bla bla nepotism.

  48. vanessa says:

    On another note, I would like to see her in a comedy! She seems like such an A type, so for her to be goofy and not in total control of her actions would be good for her. She’s an oscar winner right? She should be able to pull off a comedy.

  49. Louise says:

    I think Angelina is could at comedy. I liked her in Mr. and Mrs. Smith.

    The Jennifer calling Angelina story is ridiculous. Mostly because she doesn’t have the guts. But if this happened why would the story come out now? It would have come out years ago. Especially when Jennifer was doing all of those pity me interviews.

    These Jenfans are a trip. It’s lol that they are justifying cheating by saying it’s fine when marriage isn’t involved. Yet I’m sure they are the same people who attacked Angelina when tabloids claimed she and Johnny Depp were having an affair. Nobody said they’re single then.

  50. Lucky Charm says:

    Well, I guess I better warn my cousin’s girlfriend of almost 15 years that since he never married her some girl is going to find him fair game to “steal”. They’re both divorced, no kids, and didn’t want to get married again, but they live together and are a totally devoted, committed couple. And I guess Johnny Depp isn’t really into Vanessa, either, then?

    I know a lot of unmarried couples, with and without kids, who very happily live together. I also know couples, with and without kids, who are very UN-happily married. The ring only makes it easier to address invitations, as Mr. & Mrs. Whomever takes less room.

  51. Cheyenne says:

    futureperfect: mass fascism and mob mentality

    That sounds like an apt description of Female First. You’d love it over there. Check it out sometime.

  52. Emily says:

    A lot of the comments here a really depressing me. Unless someone’s got a ring they’re fair game? Do people really think that way? Guess I better start dating guys so I can lock them down with a ring, since I can’t marry a woman. I don’t want to be in constant fear of someone stealing her (cause, you know, people are just posessions you can snatch from their partners)…

  53. futureperfect says:

    @Cheyenne, no thanks. Clearly you’ve been there, and I’m not fond of hypocrites.

  54. kira says:

    In today’s edition of As the World Turns, Radar has pics of Aniston and Justin together, wearing matching gold rings. Given the fact that the ex-girlfriend just moved out of their home, this is rather in your face? Hmm . . .

    “Jennifer Aniston And Justin Theroux Flaunt Their Love — With Matching Rings!

    Is Jennifer Aniston missing a sensitivity chip? With rumors swirling that the 42-year-old actress stole her new beau Justin Theroux from the arms of his live-in girlfriend of 14 years, Jen stepped out on the streets of New York Wednesday with Theroux — both wearing matching gold rings on their wedding fingers.

    Strangely enough, in addition to the clunky, gaudy rings the couple were also wearing matching gold watches, and seemed keen to show off their baubles to the eager waiting paparazzi.

    Aniston and Theroux met last fall while she was filming Wanderlust — at the time he was still in a relationship with girlfriend Heidi Bivens. Sources close to his ex claim she only moved out of their shared home just last weekend.

    The publicity stunt of wearing the rings comes as a shock from the woman who once branded Angelina Jolie as “uncool” when she bragged about her relationship with Jen’s then-husband Brad Pitt, whom she met while filming Mr. and Mrs. Smith.

    Jen also commented on Pitt’s behavior, which included posing for a ‘family themed’ photo shoot with Jolie in W magazine, claiming about him: “There’s a sensitivity chip that’s missing.”

  55. janna says:

    one last time- brad pitt consciously decided he wanted to be with angelina jolie. jolie does not have magical powers over dudes. she may have put it out there, but pitt certainly didn’t have to bite! sheesh!!

  56. lisa says:

    OH let me get this straight.

    FOR YEARS Angie has been accused of breaking up oh no HOME WREAKING Laura Dern and BBT. They were not married..

    NOW Aniston is involved with a man that was in a relationship for 14 years. and it is now over because of her. YET she didn’t wreak his relationship, because he said it was over.. LIKE BBT said.. They were not married..neither were Laura and BB But according the Jen fans if a man does not marry you then he is free to do whatever he wants with whomever because your relationship is not as valued as a marriage, regardless of how long.

    So I hope all the people on this site that have forever called Angie names for BBT and Laura Dern breaking up will come and eat crow. because if Jennifer is an innocent then so was Angelina.

    boy the way that double standard bends to fit what people need it to fit is beyond reason. There were no pictures or anything of Brad/Angie until March/April of 2005 months after he and Jennifer split. but that’s ok

    LOOK Brad and Angie have told the truth. Why are they liars and cheats, but Aniston and Justin are just two people that fell in love or whatever


  57. kasper says:

    I really don’t get what Aniston is complaining about. It was fate, you can’t mess with that. One night after brushing his teeth Brad realized he’d forgotten to buy dental floss, then he remembered Angelina’s legs and the rest is history.

  58. Cheyenne says:

    futureperfect: Check it out, don’t be shy. You’d love it over there. It’s a haters’ paradise. They hold Angie responsible for everything from child sex slavery to the hole in the ozone layer.

  59. Sakyiwaa says:

    @Eve, thanx. lol.

    @lisa, not to mention that in June 2005, Aniston was photographed sitting in Vince Vaughn’s lap, wrapped in his arms, wearing nothing but a bikini. And thus began, the rebound relationship of the decade! the ink wasn’t even dry on the divorce papers… Those hens keep forgetting. well, right back at ya.

    Gonna go check Radar…hehehehe

  60. Sakyiwaa says:

    @Crash, Or Jen coulda stayed with Tate Donovan and maybe Brad and Angie woulda found each other eventually…
    By everything we now know, Brad really shouldn’t have married Jen… lol!
    See? it takes two to ‘kid’…

  61. Laughternrain says:

    How will the loonifers handle it, Kasper? More hatred and lies about Angelina, more excuses and backflips that an Olympics Acrobatic contortionist. Loonifers truly are duplicious hypocrites.

  62. Laughternrain says:

    Vanessa, I’m sorry but 14 years, there IS definitely a HOME to wreck. A defacto marriage of 14 years means they built and nurtured their home for 14 years. If you live together, you have a home!

  63. carrie says:

    Hollywood guys always have a girlfriend or a wife when you meet them

    i’m tired by Anniston/Brangelina story

    Jolie in a O Russel movie is a nice idea

  64. carrie says:

    Hollywood guys always have a girlfriend or a wife when you meet them

    i’m tired by Anniston/Brangelina story

    Jolie in a O Russel movie is a nice idea

  65. nnn says:

    Maybe Jen suddenly wanted to get rid of that 42 millions house of hers to get near Theroux in NY….

    In any way, the pictures of her and him at Radar are kinda funny, it’s like hide and seek with an ooze of embarrasment. I wasn’t sure but now i tend to beleive they are dating.

    This whole story smell bad.

    Now back to Jolie. ‘Life or something’ was great and she showed some comedic timing. But like someone said in here, i don’t see her in a goofy type of comedy, more like a dark comedy.

    Pitt is clearly underrated because he can do drama, comedy and action but comedies and actioons are not the genre in wich he is often casted. He is versatile and underrated.

  66. Sakyiwaa says:

    @futureperfect; …wow, all these responses on a Jolie post (Church of Jolie, you say)… you definitely have a ‘lack of interest’

  67. Eve says:

    @ Kasper:

    One night after brushing his teeth Brad realized he’d forgotten to buy dental floss, then he remembered Angelina’s legs and the rest is history.

    LOL! Mean, yes. But f*cking hilarious.

  68. thesea says:

    I think maybe the interest in Jolie will wane when Jennifer is dating someone. Let’s face it – the Brange ain’t intersting without Jennifer to bounce their echo off of.

    No scandal, no interest in the Brand.

  69. kasper says:

    @sakyiwaa to quote Martin Lawrence “you so crazy”.

  70. futureperfect says:

    @ skyiwaa: it’s purely sociological how often do you pray to saint veiny?

  71. thesea says:


    Go check the number of posts on the Jennifer story. It is double the interest here.

  72. Maleficent! Angie the Magnificent! Save me a seat,already! Btw,GIRLFRIENDS GET MARRIED NOW! Because until you do your man is a free agent.So, don’t be cryin’ when he comes home late or not at all.Don’t worry I’ve warned all my girls.I’m going to be busy,you know, all these weddings to attend.

  73. I wrote this poem for all my unmarried girlfriends.Titled ‘You shoulda got married’to the soundtrack of Celine Dion’s ‘My Heart Will Go On’ My man didn’t come home ’cause’ apparently,he’s allowed to roam. If only I had gotton married, I wouldn’t be sitting here all alone. Sniffle, Sniffle..end But,on the bright-side,go spend the night with your girlfriends man-only if she didn’t marry him,of course!

  74. peacemaker says:

    Ms. Jolie once said it’s not her type being a comedic,but glad if some believe she can do too. She is more serious than action,but producer love her in that way. Clint Eastwood knows better that she is a good actress,which win her award..In Love is not enough and Life or Something,that was light comedy movie and Love her rule in that movie,we notice her slim body but with curve..She so cute and funny.. Sometimes its the dialog and story makes you look funny. She very talent and I know she can do anything. In her project Maleficent wish she work with Dakota Fanning.. Good if you stop comparing the life of this two..Both parties move on..and happy. Peaceful remarks is better than stepping each other foot.