Daniel Craig “can’t wait” to get Rachel Weisz pregnant, hopes it happens soon

If I told you that Daniel Craig was coming to your house to impregnate you, what would you do? Would you strip off all of your clothes, lay down in bed and wait for him with your legs in the air? This is exactly Rachel Weisz’s dilemma in life. According to Star Mag, Daniel really, really wants to get her pregnant. So what is she supposed to do? Just wait around all day and all night, waiting for him to come home and have sex with her over and OVER AND OVER? Yeah. That sounds about right.

Daniel Craig is about to go from superspy to superdad. Craig, who recently signed a deal for two more 007 films, is trying for a baby with wife Rachel Weisz, 41. Daneil, 44, is already stepfather to Rachel’s 6-year-old son, Henry, and has a 20-year-old daughter, Ella, but he can’t wait to have a child with his new wife.

The couple hopes to announce the pregnancy early next year. Daniel is already busy picking out names and designing a nursery. A pal confirms that Rachel is thrilled too: Rachel can’t wait to have her second baby. She knows how important this is for Daniel.”

[From Star Magazine, print edition]

People have been calling Bump Watch on Rachel and Daniel ever since they married in secret in the summer of 2011. Honestly, she wasn’t pregnant then. It wasn’t a shotgun marriage. He just couldn’t keep his hands off of her. He had to marry her because she’s Rachel Friggin’ Weisz and she’s gorge (and smart and funny and talented). Rachel has said in other interviews that she’s open to having a baby, and it wouldn’t surprise me at all if they were trying. I actually really want this to happen. I want a Weisz-Craig baby. But mostly I just want to watch a tape of the conception.

Photos courtesy of Pacific Coast News and WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

58 Responses to “Daniel Craig “can’t wait” to get Rachel Weisz pregnant, hopes it happens soon”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. alons-y alonso says:

    Their child would be the most beautiful child ever.
    Also, Rachel Friggin’ Weisz! – lol

  2. Christina says:

    Sorry, am going to take this bit of totally unfounded gossip with a pinch of salt. Especially as they couldn’t even get Rachel’s age right – 10 seconds on Google will tell you that she’s 42, not 41.

    And given how fiercely protective Craig is about his and his family’s personal life, I doubt he’d be sharing such information with ‘a pal’ who then goes and blabs to the tabloids.

    • yoyo says:

      totally agree. The first thing I thought was, hold on a s second isn’t she in her 40s? Only in lala land do they think they can just whip out babies at 40+ Be realistic, seriously. Of course it CAN happen but a woman’s fertility goes down dramatically at that age and the pregnancy risks to mother and children go up exponentially. But well its lala land where you can buy kids in 3rd world countries, buy surrogates etc… smh
      I call bs on this.

      • Becky1 says:

        You’d be surprised. There are a lot of women 40+ who are able to get pregnant without fertility drugs, etc. I sometimes think that the media has exaggerated the 35+ decline in fertility. Yes, it definitely exists but plenty of women in their late 30’s and early 40’s have healthy children without getting fertility treatments. I have a friend who had an unplanned pregnancy at 43-she’s actually due any day now. She and her husband weren’t always careful because they thought they didn’t need to be because of her age.

      • Bluedog says:

        Becky, I hope you’re not basing your own fertility decisions on anecdotal reasoning. The media is not exaggerating the decline in fertility that occurs in women after 35, so please don’t think you have unlimited time to have kids just because you know a few women in their 40s who’ve gotten pregnant. Ninety percent of a woman’s eggs are gone by age 40!

    • ichsi says:

      I call bs on this too. While I would love for this people to procreate with each other(AND get my hands on a tape) I’m very sure Mr I’m-a-secret-agent-in-RL-when-it-comes-to-my-relationships would blab about this.

    • Bread and Circuses says:

      And his daughter is 18, not 20.

      • Amanda says:

        I think you are mistaken about Ella’s age. According to IMDB, she was born in 1992, which would make her either 20 or 19 going on 20.

  3. Amelia says:

    Aw, Baby Bond!
    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again; I love this couple.
    They don’t famewhore, they’re genuinely talented, at least 1/2 of them hate the Kardashians …
    Why can’t all celebrities be like this? But I suppose without the Cracken and Shifty Swifty types we wouldn’t have anyone to laugh at.
    Happy Friday, Celebitches! Cracktini’s are on me 🙂
    Side note; can’t wait til clocking off time. Skyfall tonight!!

    • marie says:

      ha ha, can you see a bond baby with the little suit and hair, holding his bottle saying “shaken, not stirred” ha, how adorable..

      • Amelia says:

        *baby in a Tom Ford tux snaps his fingers*
        Sen’ ‘da baa-man ova.
        3 measures of hot milk, 1 of water, half a measure of apple juice, shaken over ice and add a thin slice of lemon peel.
        The baby Vesper ^^

    • Lisa says:

      Yes, the baby Bond! Not least because Rachel looks like Eva Green/Vesper Lynd. 🙂 I hope this is true.

  4. SueAnn says:

    He is not bad looking, but I have never gotten a super hot feeling for him. Rachel, however is a goddess. Go Daniel!!

  5. Rose says:

    i was sure he had a baby with his ex fiance?

  6. alys says:

    Discreet, private, no drama, ever. Talented, devoted to each other.

    What’s not to love?

    • tracking says:


    • jinni says:

      No drama? I guess you missed the whole Satsuki (I think that’s his ex’s name) taking his card and having a spending spree as revenge for going with Rachel stories. The only reason why the story did blow up or get dragged into every article about him, like certain celebs, is because his ex is a nobody and no one is really interested by Daniel and his drama.

      • alys says:

        No, didn’t miss the drama.

        I don’t recall Daniel or Rachel commenting, nor do I recall their reps commenting.


    • mln76 says:

      Yeah they actually have really juicy gossip connected to them…both had S/O’s at the time and he’s rumored to have propositioned Wiesz by sneaking to her trailer naked….there is also the rumor that he was also sneaking around with Mara Rooney and that she was livid when he married Weisz. Oh and if you want to be really out there there’s also a ton of rumors that Aranofsky (Rachel’s ex) is the biological father of Natalie Portman’s baby.

      Just sayin plenty of drama.

      • taxi says:

        I didn’t think Rachel & Aranofsky were ever married. Thought they were “domestic partners.”

  7. T.C. says:

    I don’t find him attractive or as talented as Rachel but I like that he’s not a famewhore. He wouldn’t be blabbing about someyhing so personal. This is the couple that married in secret with no media finding out. So put this under untrue.

  8. mk yarwood says:

    This is what my married life is like right now. We’re only one cycle into officially ‘trying’ for our second and final family unit, but any spare moment that someone else is not around it’s like ‘drop your pants, sir humphrey, I cannot wait til lunchtime!’

  9. jinni says:

    I hope the Rachel’s genes overpowers his of they do have a child.

    • Addison says:

      Agree with you totally. Rachel genes are better than Daniel. He’s okay but not gorgeous. I wish he would not have signed for more of 007. That said I love Bond, so I will watch Skyfall. No one is better than Connery though, yet.

    • emmie_a says:

      I am definitely in the minority here but I don’t think he’s attractive. He has a very plain, washed-out look. I always wonder how he got cast as Bond.

      • LAK says:

        You can blame the film LAYERCAKE. Prior to that he always played rough and ready characters to great effect but that film showcased his glamour for the first time which got him the BOND job. At least that’s the explanation he gave years ago for why he was cast as BOND.

        As for people claiming he isn’t as talented as Rachel….clearly you haven’t seen his previous work prior to BOND. He was a very respected character actor. He sold out with the BOND films. His body of work trumps hers.

  10. Dea says:

    Love this couple!

  11. mommak918 says:

    ahhhh theyre hot to trot….

    not entirely sure about the saying. but gosh he is manly and she is stunning. their chemistry makes me feel warm and tingly inside…..

    reminds me of the years ago when i was dating my hubs. before the kids and bills piled up.

    i come to cb to escape!

  12. Barrett says:

    Um she may be on the old side to have a baby. Possible but not a sure thing. That is private so I doubt they are sharing. Can be painful if you can’t so this gossip makes me sad. This is their business.

  13. DeltaJuliet says:

    Oh my. If Daniel wanted to imprgnante me……..I have to go find a place to lie down…..**swoon**

  14. LAK says:

    Dear kaiser, may I recommend the film THE MOTHER as the closest you’ll ever have to a craig sex tape!!!

  15. Eleonor says:

    If Daniel wanted to impregnate me wherever and whenever he wants 24/7.

  16. fabgrrl says:

    *sigh* I love Rachel Weisz, and I’m fond of Daniel Craig. I’ll be a surrogate for them if they need one.

  17. LeeLoo says:

    I’m still surprised we haven’t heard of their jilted exes hooking up. I can see Darren with whatshername. It could totally happen!

    The Empress Z may have either competition or a partner in crime depending on the gender of the little one…that baby would be a gorgeous genius.

  18. Sara says:

    At 41, they better get the process going as it may not be that easy to get pregnant at her age. Not impossible but not easy either.

  19. TG says:

    Thanks for the laughs Kaiser. The opening sentence still has me laughing.

  20. dorothy says:

    He’s welcome to practice his procreation skills with me. Over and over again.

  21. lori says:

    I still think he’s a crier in the sack.

  22. Cody says:

    IMO it is just gossip. I think they are both into their careers and lifestyle. They each have a child from another marriage, they both have been there and done that.

  23. dahlianoir says:

    He can try with me too, bring Javier along Daniel !

    (Rachel I love you to death :p)

  24. Tina says:

    Hope their baby has piercing blue eyes as Daniel!

  25. themummy says:

    I think she is the most beautiful woman I have ever seen. Love her. I Bet they would make an insanely gorgeous baby.

    Star got her age wrong. She’s 42.

  26. j.eyre says:

    Gosh, Danny, we can’t wait for you knock her up either. Shall we form a cheer squad?

    • honeybee says:

      Get her pregnant already! They both don’t have any movies in line for the next year.
      Perfect timing.

  27. Suzy says:

    To answer your first two questions: Yes and Yes. lol

  28. Helvetica says:

    She is so beautiful. They both look amazing the last pic.

  29. Amanda says:

    I take any article Star writes with a grain of salt.

  30. midnightmoon says:

    i’ve seen and enjoyed Layercake (Sienna Miller? i HATE her but she was pretty good in this one) and Flashbacks of a Fool (the ending really truly sucked, but he was great-interesting, strange story, and very surprising for someone like him to do that kind of a role). I think their kids will have the pout to end all pouts. could be good, could be Mick Jagger territory-I don’t agree that Mick’s kids are good looking, regardless of the moms he made them with. I haven’t seen any of Rachel or Daniel’s offspring. Not interested enough to look. but I suspect a boy might be adorable. girl? iffy.

  31. Camille (TheOriginal) says:

    As long as the baby takes after her and not him. He is one of the most over rated looks wise actors in Hollywood. He is so friggin fug IMO. She however, is utterly beautiful.

  32. ramie says:

    I wouldn’t have his child. She is beautiful though. Also, I would NOT have a child in my 40’s due to the risk of major birth defects!

    • Mazunte says:

      I guess you are much younger than 40… Think twice before saying “never.” You don’t know what life reserves for you. Sometimes, life circumstances do not allow us to have kids when we want or should, or we can find someone we truly love later in life, with whom we would like to have a child. Life doesn’t happen always as we plan or as biology tells us it should happen. Fortunately, medicine is developed enough to detect some of those defects during the first months of gestation.

  33. Sapphyre says:

    Except for the Bond franchise and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo role, Daniel’s selection of movie roles is very…let’s say…mediocre.
    Dream House was so all over the place, I got bored in the 1st half hour.
    Basically, what I am saying is, once the flame of his Bond role fizzles, he won’t seem so hot.
    Also, I don’t think this marriage to Rachel will end well because it didn’t begin well.