Chris McMillan is Jennifer Aniston’s long-time hairstylist. He’s so much more than that for Jennifer, though. He created “The Rachel” hairstyle and when she and Brad Pitt split up, she moved in with Chris briefly. I think he’s the only one allowed to cut her hair. And he gives her blowouts on a regularly basis, and he controls the hue too, Jennifer’s patently honey/caramel/blonde. Anyway, this is a new photo of Jennifer and Chris together, which he posted on his Instagram page with the message “Best #friends #no makeup #girl-time”.
If you go here to Chris’s Instagram, you can see that he also recently worked with Paris Hilton too. Which is kind of funny. Jennifer has a reputation as being pretty anti-technology, anti-social media. I remember John Mayer throwing some shade at her for being “stuck in the ‘90s” as far as today’s celebrity self-promotion goes – she doesn’t have a Twitter, or a Facebook page or anything else. She doesn’t pose for selfies. She doesn’t tweet about politics. She doesn’t promote her films on social media at all. So it’s really weird to see Aniston on her hair guy’s Instagram.
As for Jennifer without makeup… I think she looks fine. I can see some sun damage and her skin looks sort of “weathered” but that’s to be expected. She’s in her 40s and she loves to sunbathe, you know? I think she looks really good for a woman who loves the sun.
Here are some more photos of Aniston at the We’re the Millers premiere. I love the color of her dress, but the material and the design is boring/cheap. I also don’t understand why she has been doing this ratty “bedhead” hair on so many red carpets the past few years. I’m also including some of the shots of her engagement ring, which looks much better in these photos. It looks… clearer. Less like quartz.
Photos courtesy of Instagram, WENN.
I’m sorry – I know that her ring is a rose cut diamond, but it looks like it came out of a Cracker Jack box. I’m a jewelry lover, but I just can’t get there with this ring.
The ring looks like a lemon ice flavored ring pop.
Of course it looks that way to someone who isnt used to seeing a high quality clear and non cloudy diamond ring.
Um, that’s a weird comment. I’m sure many of us are “used to” clear, non cloudy diamonds.
I’m speaking, rather, to the actual proportions of the ring.
Thats the point. The ring is very cloudy and looks more like a quartz or something. It looks too cloudy to be a diamond.
The rose cut is a very old cut. The technique was simple and sometimes the diamond did look cloudy. Just like how a brilliant cut reflects the light better.
Kay
This diamond ring looked horrible before. Quartz and cloudy and cheap. And not the same cheap as a high quality diamond.
Amber Rose’s Diamond looked fake because it was so perfect… Flawless or nearly flawless. Aniston’s just looked like Justin sacrificed clarity for carat. At least in these pics it looks like it’s been steam cleaned.
As much as I love blingy rocks, this ring looks uninspired.
@kay – Us peasants, see a “high quality clear and non cloudy diamond ring“?! Of *course* not! The very idea…
I can’t tell if you’re just over defensive of JA, or just plain rude. ¬_¬
Because it is soooooo large the ring looks like a cartoon, as in fake. To me it doesn’t matter how clear or cloudy it is because it looses it’s appeal when it is so large that you have to constantly adjust it to stay on top of your finger. Bleh!
Interesting that there has been no mention of who the jeweller was for this ring? No one has stepped forward to claim it.
I find it reminiscent of a Victorian Door Knob… , myself.
The stone is an old mine cut, not rose cut. It has a table (albiet small) and rose cut stones don’t have those. It also appears to have pavillion facets, rose cuts are flat backed. Since no one cuts them this way anymore, it’s almost certainly an antique, which would be why no jeweler has stepped forward to “claim” it’s creation. They’ve also become rather sought after over the past few years, I guess some people prefer character, history and originality over DeBeers marketing.
As for being “cloudy”. No… but it’s probably a stone that fluoresces and what the camera “sees” and renders is not what the eye sees. If any of you remember the old much vaunted “blue white” diamonds, those were stones with strong blue fluorescence under SWUV, and that would be apparent in daylight to the eye Gems are also notoriously difficult to photograph properly since the same stone will react to the various wavelengths of light differently.
I kind of like that he didn’t go for a “cookie cutter” 5ct RB cut stone, anyone with enough $$$ can do that. Tick off the boxes of carat size, cut, clarity and colour on Blue Nile and you can buy a piece of paper (grading report) with a diamond attached. No romance in that. He obviously took the time to hunt something different down in person, so kudos to him. And even bigger kudos to a guy who loved the stone despite it’s imperfections because frankly, I can’t think of a more romantic message to be given from a man who wants to marry you.
lot of belly on her in that dress, lets start the expectancy rumors now.
They look like Brother/Sister.
And she makes damn sure you see her ring pop. She has been telling the story that Theroux told Sudakis where to get Olivia’s ring. Funny he had never said a word about it. Not sure why it became her story.
She was really kissing up to Olivia Wilde in that interview. It was so weird.
It’s official she’s a butterface
She is very unattractive. Nothing feminine about her. I think she is preggers for sure. Why would she wear a dress that shows it off.
No brainier
Because you’re bloated and your dress was fitted when you weren’t.
JA is in no way pregnant. If she was we’d be hearing about it every step of the way. This would be milked for all it’s worth.
My best guess is she been drinking or it’s normal woman bloat.
She looks a LOT better with make-up on.
Gah.
She isn’t pregnant, but we are all talking about it.
WIN for Aniston/Huvane.
Bad dress at publicity event = instant bump tabloid Speculation. Calculated move?
Well Huvane told ET and ENews she is”not pregnant”.DK why she wore that unflattering dress
I think she looks nice in the last photo. As in, she reminds me of a friend in that shot, so my cold hard bitch heart melted temporarily.
I’m trying to melt my cold, ice bitch heart-but it’s slow going. I just can’t with her, most days.
I think she looks cute in that picture. Her skin looks good considering all the years of smoking and sun worship.
I don’t really care that she avoids the social media stuff. If anything I’d say she proves that if people are really into you….you don’t need it to stay famous. For better or worse, people are still into her.
She looks like a girlfriend of mine in the make-up free photo so I can’t say anything bad about it; Damn.
I think that she’s one of those people (like Jennifer Lawrence) who look ten times better when they don’t have twenty pounds of makeup slapped on them. She looks a lot fresher and prettier in that instagram pic, than she does at that film premier. I think the makeup looks way too prom-y….I think she should just stick with foundation that’s her skintone, maybe some light pink chapstick-if the beachy look is what she’s going for.
And change up her hair-it looked really bad at the premier. She looked like she rolled out of bed and ran a comb through her hair in the car on the way there. She should wear it up or cut it into a bob.
I think she’s either quit doing wtf she was doing to her face or it was the make up because for a while the area around her mouth looked weird…like leathery, plasticky-like a mask. She just needs to get a facial or something once in a while. and moisturize.
I agree that she look really cute. Maybe a dash older than with makeup, but at the same time also prettier without it.
I totally agree. She actually looks fresh, pretty and natural in the Instagram shot. And I do not compliment her often.
Too much concealer in those premier pictures.
She looks fine in the candid shot.
I’ve never thought her to be stunning in the first place.
Without makeup JA looks like Penelope Widmore from Lost. (Which is not a bad thing!)
I read somewhere that he gets his haircut at hair cuttery with on specific stylist. Kudos to her for wearing her mid-age bump with pride! I am not usually a Jen fan, but she looks real and healthy in these pics.
I guess having a long-time hair stylist explains why she’s had a long-time hairstyle…
And if I see one more story regarding this “no makeup” photo where she is described as “stunning I’m going to throw my laptop! Is almost as bad as the Aveeno commercial where the voice over calls her “the beautiful Jennifer Aniston.”
She is Stunning. Throw your laptop
There is absolutely nothing stunning about her. If I saw her on the street I wouldn’t look twice.
Respectfully disagree – if you need a commercial to describe you as “beautiful”, you’re probably not.
Cute, yes; maybe even pretty, but not stunning or beautiful.
😄 ,she is cute, also looks better when she gain some pounds
She has never been stunning, with or without makeup. I’m with you epiphany, if you need a commercial to tell you if you’re beautiful or not, more than likely you aren’t. She has always had strong features. She isn’t gorgeous,just average. She has the girl next door look, but when has the girl next door ever been stunning. The girl next door looks like Jen Aniston, Jen Garner, and Reese Witherspoon. They do not look like Charlize Theron, Paula Patton and Angelina Jolie.
Especially since I don’t even think she IS makeup free. She clearly has some sort of mascara on and also her brows look pretty dark for “no makeup.” She is a big phony…and a butterface.
I think she looks fabulous.
it’s cute, she looks good without make-up.
She looks like an average & plain women with an average body, she just happens to have a great PR team.
Go to any beach and see way better bodies, look in Hollywood and see much more beautiful women.
I think she’s average facially but I disagree that her figure is average.
Her breasts alone are not average. They are naturally full and perky in a way that is better than average. She’s in good shape. I give her props for that.
“Her breasts alone are not average. They are naturally full and perky in a way that is better than average.”
How do you know her breast are perky have their been topless pics of her. You really can’t judge them when they have been pushed up and concealed under whatever she is wearing.
She has implants so there is nothing ‘naturally full and perky’ about her breasts. As for the rest of her figure, it’s toned but nothing great.
@veeeery I really don’t like to comment on much unless I know some of the story. After googling her boobs from “The Break-Up” I must say there are nothing spectacualar about her boobs. They are not perky or full as poster Andrea had suggested. Perhaps maybe that’s why there wasn’t such a big deal about them. There is nothing special about those breasts. Her breast are nothing more than average.
Veeeery
Pictures are always touched up. Even these “candid” shots from random celebs are not without their touch ups. If not photo shop they can use the many filters and software on all smart phones.
Promotional pics and movie posters are some of the most obvious or worst failures of photo editing.
I’m a JA fan, but not for her acting and not because I think she’s pretty. She’s an average woman that has a career because of who she married once years and years ago and who she’s romantically linked to.
I agree completely. In certain socio-economic strata, fit 40-something’s are par for the course. You’ll see way hotter bodies on moms with 3 kids in the Whole Foods in Tribeca or Greenwich.
At least she has a job unlike those women. I’m sure they’ve had just as much work done, if not more. Please!
@Marina, exactly what I was thinking. In fact I’m really starting to tire of the uber-fit moms who clearly devote an inordinate amount of time to their appearance even if their job doesn’t center around appearance like JA’s.
esmom- what SHOULD uber fit moms devote their “own” time to, then. Crafting? scrapbooking? Would those be acceptable hobbies? So JUDGY- i can’t stand it. Someone enjoys working out and it shows – how awful. Sigh
@muffin, Point taken. I have nothing against working out, I do it myself. But I know women who spend hours at the gym each day and to me that seems excessive unless they’re training for an athletic event. But you’re right, if that’s how they want to spend their time who am I to judge?
While I admit she’s never been the prettiest girl in the room, since her Brad split her body has been fantastic, although yes, celebrities like Gwen Stefani who’ve had 2 kids look better….even Carla Bruni looks fantastic bodywise(she had a recent beach photo)
I don’t get why people love her. She is a less than average talented actress. I hated that stupis show she was in for all those years. That movie “marly and me” was good but that’s only because of the fucking dog.
What else has she done besides marry Brad Pitt. So strange the way everyone still goes on about that. It’s ancient history. And I never thought they looked like they were a good match anyway.
I’ll pass on the Jennifer Aniston fan club. Really not sure what they celebrate about her
you can argue that her face is average, but her body is way above average, never mind the fact that she is in her mid 40s.
I always thought she had great breasts. There hasn’t been a recent topless pic that I’ve seen but she’s always running around in tank or bikini tops with her nipples showing.
@Marina Why do we think just because a woman is in her 40’s it’s all down hiil? We talk aboput being feminist and all but yet give into the male way of thinking that if a woman is in her 40’s which is not that old that she is designed to look a certain way. There are women in their 50’s that looks just as good or better than Anniston. Check out this photo of Helen Miren, a woman in her 60’s. Her bod looks better than Anniston. Tina Turner body was amazing into her 60’s as well. Jeez, we criticize men for sexualizing us but are we any better for thinkng just because you’re in your 40’s it’s an amazing task to have a great body. Look at the Naomi Campbell post. She’s in her 40’s and her body hasn’t changed much since she entered the modeling business. Stop this she looks great for a woman who is in her 40’s crap; 40’s are not that old. Look at that crazy housewife of NJ, (Danielle Staub) the woman is damn near 50 and her body looks amazing so does Halle Berry, Vivica A. Fox, Vanessa Williams and so on.
http://www.egotastic.com/photos/dame-helen-mirren-bikini-pictures/
Nevermind she is forty-something, and has never had children to worry and lose sleep with, or to change her body, and has chefs that cook special salads and other special meals, and is able to work out 4 hours a day, with a trainer if she wants to, and can visit the dermatologist and plastic surgeon any day she wants.
Only average thing about her are her looks, and her conversation in interviews, totally anodine.
I think she looks pretty good without makeup.
Lots of celebs don’t do the whole social media thing.
Agree. Imo, as one in her age peer group, I think she looks pretty good with no makeup- I can’t trash a girl for looking good.
She looks amazing for her age- for sure- no shame in doing it- i think. As women- i think we need to more supportive of one another rather than throw shade on others on superficial matters.It really brings us all down.
And the belly in the dress comments..LOL! Oh you have no idea if you think that is a belly 😉
I think she looks good with no makeup, I wished I looked like that, of course I think most actresses look completely different without makeup. As for the ring, eh it’s to big and cocktail looking for me, but I didn’t like her first wedding ring that Brad designed or the one that he gave Angelina, I more of an antique wedding ring person.
How do you know that she’s not wearing makeup? Just because someone told you she wasn’t? I wouldn’t automatically believe what a celebrity tells you or wants you to believe.
All photos when they say they are wearing no makeup are usually always wearing a bit of makeup.
For a star here her brows have been filled in. She would have a tinted moisturizer on and some concealer. Her lashes either have a coat of mascara or she has fake eyelash extensions on. Also her lips… That is not a natural colour. NO way… I can see the liner.
Really we don’t know if she is or isn’t wearing makeup most of the stuff on these sites are speculation. It’s obvious that in this picture she does not wearing gobs of makeup and I personally think she looks pretty good for a woman in her 40s.
She probably dyes her eyelashes like a lot of women do. Doesn’t look very mascara-ish to me.
I think she’s beautiful!
She looks great.
Doesn’t look like she gets injections/fillers; it’s always nice to see a non-frozen forehead (see Elle for contrast)
OMG. She has been injecting crap into her face for years. She does look frozen to a certain extent and why do you think she looks puffier? Botox and fillers.
She has had way too much injecting around her mouth. It’s very noticeable
Really? And you know this how?
I always think she’s more beautiful all natural. I loved when she let her hair go curly in the Brad Pitt days. She’s just an earthy girl next door type. She’s not glamorous, but not everyone has to be. I think she looks great here in “no” makeup, or more like minimal makeup.
All natural? There is nothing natural about Aniston. She fronts like she’s an all-natural beach girl, but she’s a fraud. Hair-fake. Skin tone-fake. Perky breasts-fake. Not to mention all the unnatural crap (surgery, fillers, etc.) she’s done to her face. She obviously has make-up on in the instagram. Just not caked-on and it hasn’t been photoshopped. She and her P.R. team keep cramming the myth of “The Beautiful Jennifer Aniston” down our throats. Ugh.
Don’t forget the 4 nosejobs!
Bless your heart…
You know all of this how???
She looks really cute and happy in that picture.
She is as deep as a puddle.
But she does have some make up on!
A discussion about nothing. As usual. The lady has a huge PR.
I know, I had the exact same thought.
Exactly. Usually when someone points out that they are totally makeup free, they have something on — concealer and powder can work wonders and look au natural.
She looks okay most of the time but nothing you would rave about. I guess her appeal for me lies in the fact that she is quirky, upbeat and easygoing. She doesn’t come across as an entitled Hollywood diva with perpetual bitchface. If she weren’t an actress she would be, like, your family’s favorite hostess at the Olive Garden. I like her hair color here.
Tate Donovan would disagree. He described their relationship as “she prefers 5 star hotels and he was more a bed & breakfast kind of guy”.
She looks like Barbra Streisand to me in the Instagram photo. She does look better without cakes of make-up and that awful hairstyle she sports on the red carpet. She always remind me of one of the “Real Housewives of the OC”.
Lol! Soon she will be palling around with Brandi Glanville. Two cheerful boozehounds who lost their husbands. Any gf is an improvement over Chelsea Handler, though.
Has she ever said who made that cocktail ring?
No! I think the ring is ugly and looks cheap. Maybe it’s the setting, or it’s just not high quality, but it looks cheap. I mean, I loved Elizabeth Taylor’s Taylor-Burton (Krupp Diamond), so I should, technically, like this one. But it looks like a ring out of a gumball machine. And I can’t believe her team leaked all those reports about Justin “designing” the ring. There is no design aesthetic at all in that ring. It looks like he picked the cheapest stone he could find, picked a band to go with it, and told them to have at it.
Wow, Jennifer hasn’t really done no makeup + no shades in nearing 10 years…..whereas celebs her age like Halle, Julia, Angelina, Charlize, Reese have multiple no makeup, no sunglasses every year.
Must mean she feels really comfortable in her skin and is happy with her life and her relationship at the moment.
Err Karen FYI- Angelina, Reese, and Charlize are 37/38, 6-7 years younger than Jen. Halle and Julia are in their mid 40’s+ like Jen. Just wanted to correct that.
I do not like her ring as it has no discernible shape, it looks like a big piece of broken off inclusion filled quartz. And it is not a great example of a rose cut. Seems to me JT did a better job of helping JS pick out Olivia’s ring which is truly unique.
Jen looks good for her age and there is nothing wrong with that, she has the money and the time to have every treatment possible to preserve the illusion of youth as long as possible. I just wish her PR would stop constantly ramming and cramming words like gorgeous and beautiful to describe in all her ads as if to reassure her that she is which she is not. Must be some major lurking insecurity issues.
I agree that it’s not a great example of a rose cut. Especially because it’s an old mine cut stone, not a rose cut at all.
Re: inclusion filled quartz… Not hardly. The luster of that stone in the previous post’s pix is visibly not that of quartz, but of diamond.
Much ado about nothing. She is attractive, not stunning. She is a celebrity not a talented actress by any means. It’s a pity she is the Hollywood standard instead of a really talented overlooked actress who isn’t constantly, and I mean constantly on every screen everywhere. I am way over this talentless woman.
Agree with every word of this statement.
+1
Meh. I think she has some talent but she has done nothing interesting with it for quite some time, so it seems like that bud is withering.
I would gladly wear that ring!
I can’t believe anyone thinks she is not wearing any makeup. She looks like she is wearing lipstick though she has her lips pursed to hide that fact.
She is absolutely wearing makeup
I hate it when they try and treat the public like fools
She probably doesn’t have a personal trainer, hairdresser and chef either
And pigs fly
It looks more like the photo has been edited. This pic looks like it has a filter over it. Something to blur and soften specific colors.
Candid shots of her have been taken before and she looks like hell in the face. Yes she has a beauty regimen, but sun, alcohol, and smoking for years will do damage that moisturizing and exfoliating cannot undo.
Yep, Jen is wearing makeup. That being said, I think she’s aging well. I hope she resists the disfiguring ‘Courtney Cox’ plastic discount for volume work.
Sorry, but her face is just so fug to me. Maybe it’s also her friendship with CH that makes her less attractive as well. Before that, she came across as a nicer person. The crack she made about Katie Couric made me see what a piece of work she must be. Oh yeah, Alexis Carrington ca. 1984 called & she wants her ring back.
I haven’t seen the interview (I refuse to watch Chelsea Handler) but I read about it. For a woman who puts herself out there for the tabloids, she really shouldn’t play fake sensitive when it comes to media scrutiny of her relationships.
“What’s Katie Couric? Is she a legitimate journalist? Is she getting tabloidy? Wasn’t she on the Today show?”
Nice attitude, Jen, because we all know you’re SO above all that.
I don’t watch either but read it too b/c her show (& her minions) sicken me. Chelsea Handler is the type of person who’s “nice” to your face & as soon as you’re out of earshot tears you apart. Then claims to be part of the “sisterhood”. The “what’s a Katie Couric” shit was it for me. They deserve eachother. Ugh.
That’s true. The way I read that interview, Chelsea was name-dropping Katie (asking her about the wedding), but when Jen slagged Katie off, Chelsea did an about-face and said that yeah, Katie had been demoted on the Today show. Yech. You’re so right, those two were made for each other.
I see less makeup, not no makeup.
Ugh she looks the same with or without makeup. BORING.
Eh we are the same age. I think she looks like most everyday 44 year old women that I know. I give her props for not overdoing Botox, fillers, lasers, etc. And I’m genuinely surprised she would pose for a photo with no makeup, glasses and her hair up ( how I look on weekends) I can’t shade her at all I’m afraid. Dang it!
I’m glad you posted that photo. She looks great with little to no makeup on. I love her eyes.
In the first photo she really reminds me of Barbara Streisand
I see Tatum O’Neal.
That’s what I thought too- total Babs
i think this is the first dress she’s worn were you cannot see her nipples. Perhaps she’s maturing enough to forgo her one and only money maker (along with her hair of course)..
I think she looks fine with and without makeup but she needs a new manicurist. She also needs to either lay off the vino or stop wearing such tight outfits.
Agree with the majority that JA is an overrated celebrity and pretty, NOT stunning women. Her ring is ridiculous but that is just my opinion. The only memorable work she’s done is The Good Girl and Horrible Bosses IMO. She looks best as a brunette. She was funny and gorgeous in Horrible Bosses – I’ll give her that.
Personally, I don’t hate her, but everything I’ve ever seen her in has been bland, unfunny, and forgettable, and I just don’t really get how she’s considered one of the most beautiful people in the world. But I also find Angelina Jolie overrated in looks and acting skills, so whatevs.
I think she looks nice in that photo actually.
Oh so HE’S the dumbass that doesn’t get thefact that you can either bleach or straighten curly hair (which she does, that’s why it used to have so much body) for decades, but you can’t do both otherwise it will be bet-down. She had an unfortunate incident with keratin I reckon during the promotion for that film with Cauliflower-face Butler – remember those terrible extensions to try and fill it out.
Convince the girl to go curly for a while and her hair will thank you!
I’ve been saying for ages she needs to let her hair alone for at least six months to a year. Don’t bleach it, don’t blow-dry it, just keep it clean and conditioned and let it alone. Her hair is a fried mess. It’s thinning and dried out and all wispy at the ends. It’s going to start breaking off if she isn’t careful.
Maybe she insists, and he’s all “fine, whatever, it’s your hair-just pay me”…so he gets paid to do her hair, and then paid to fix the damage.
I know this woman, a friend of my mom’s who is a hair dresser. She is super picky about what she does to people’s hair, depending on their past work done to their head. Like she won’t give someone highlights, if they’ve permed their hair. I remember she tried to explain that it’s just going to destroy your hair to some girls, but they kinda just ignored her. I figure they went to someone else.
But some people are like that-maybe Aniston is.
I agree with other she has on makeup (there are photos on this site from last week when she was wearing the blue dress and she didn’t have makeup on and her face was ruff! She just had on shades to hide her eyes). She also has her chin in his shoulder to pull back the her face and hide her chin. Plus there is soft lighting to soften the photo.
Aniston has some real confidence issues because at 44 years old you shouldn’t be pulling a teen move by posting photos like this, especially if your self-esteem is good. She need the attention and the affirmation from others that she is something special. At 44 and to still have the “mommy never told me I’m pretty” issue is sad, especially after all the years of therapy this person has had. Also, as others have said her body is nothing special. It is a pr/media repeat that has brainwashed folks into believing her body is something special when in truth for her money, no major body changes like pregnancy and her job she is suppose to maintain her body to a smaller size. Hell Sandra Bullock is 45 and have a way better body than Aniston. People and their rose colored glasses.
+1. Completely agree with everything you said.
+2
With her money & resources there’s no reason for her not to look good bodywise. Her body is no better or worse than most any other actress in Hollywood which is their job.
When you have to buy sexiest woman ever titles and have it announced in your advert the beautiful JA she definitely has make up on, soft focus lens and this is probably one of many photos taken til it was just right for her.
She and he have been friends for years. Why all of a sudden is he posting pics of them together. And there were pics of her on set without makeup
http://www.celebitchy.com/313179/jennifer_anistons_stripper_diet_on_a_cheat_day_i_had_to_have_a_kale_chip/
and there is a big difference. I have seen many pics of her “makeup free”. I think she does things to counter what she thinks are not flattering pics of her Thus all the super tight clothes when she has been photographed looking very average. Just like when she and Justin got together we got all these instagram or set pics of them together as a couple. all taken by that Richardson guy. Never seen that before. So she is well aware of this picture being posted. And while she may not be on twitter or other social media her friends are and they are taking care of it for her.
She looks good in the pic. Her skin looks damaged, but the blurriness of it hides that fact. And as a magazine editor said, Jennifer has to approve all pics of herself. I remember when some “natural” pics of her from a photoshoot got out and her PR guy sent nasty letters to have them removed. Really. What woman that is Stunning, Beautiful would care? she sure does; because she is reading all that crap (she admitted to doing so)
Thank you! Also, she don’t have to admit to reading sites like this because she reveals all the rumors in her interviews. Her last interview she basically named all the recent People wedding covers.
If she’s reading this site, especially the stuff about herself, she needs to rethink her “friendship” with Chelsea Handler. It ain’t doin’ you any good, girl.
She looks her age.Her ring is dreadful.
I LOVE it when actresses BROADCAST their ‘without makeup’ faces. I daydream/hope it helps girls everywhere accept themselves. good call jenn
Makeup, no makeup, I think she’s pretty. Her facial features are unique, IMO.
And how freaking wonderful to have hair stylist for life! I live in Europe and I dread going to get my hair done about 2 weeks in advance. There are some situations where I do not like to take chances on how my “budding” French vocabulary comes across and one of those is definitely my hair.
Well he does get paid a lot of money. So being her Stylist for life has been very profitable for him. I mean they are friends, but he is not working for free.
Because I have a vain daughter (and she is young and beautiful), I can tell you…that was not a one-shot and post it picture. Trust me, many pictures were taken until it was just right…(sigh-eyeroll).
How has no one mentioned those banging glasses? Who cares about the ring… tell me about those specs.
This woman is boring and unattractive and has never done anything of interest. Why some people’s world revolve around her (as far as fans go) is beyond me. We should be paying attention to people that make a difference in the world.
I’m 19 years old and I wish I looked like that without make up. She looks good and she’s definitely one of those people who look much better without a ton of slap on. Which can only be a blessing.
I love the ring. Am I the only one?
No, you’re not.
At least it’s not a deadly boring round brilliant like 90% of the world’s diamond ring wearers buy.
Is the rounded stomach supposed to garner attention for her latest movie? Are we supposed to go, “Ohhh, Jen Aniston is pregnant?” Must be just a publicity stunt for why else would she wear a dress that shows a hefty stomach? Don’t buy it for a moment that she is pregnant.
I think she is one of those women would can really bloat in that area. I guess she chooses not to hide in shame when she is bloating. *shrug*
I think the average woman is being a bit too delusional by saying Jennifer Aniston looks like an average woman. Most women are not as attractive as her, and certainly not at her age.
Jennifer Aniston has a nice body for her age, but she has never been extremely attractive. Her features are too strong for a women. She isn’t ugly but she isn’t gorgeous. If she was on the street I wouldn’t look twice. She is okay, JMO.
Every article regarding this photo describes Aniston as “gorgeous!, “stunning!” Interesting how this just happened to occur on the eve of her new film opening. This whole thing is looking more and more like a Huvane maneuver to garner yet more publicity. BTW, it’s the writers of the article that refer to her as stunning – almost unanimously, the commenters are saying the opposite – that she’s far from stunning – and calling out the writers for being on Aniston’s payroll.
They both look really ugly and arent they a bit old to be instagraming and acting cutsey wootsey??
As far as her so-called beauty…she PAYS her PR people to shove that down our throats but truth be told on any given Sunday I see FAR more beautiful on the street of NYC any day……one of those girls is Justin Therouxs GORGEOUS ex girlfriend Heidi Bivins. Now, THATS a real gorgeous girl! I can imagine it must burn her! And, its proboably why she went scurrying back to LA after plunking millions down in nyc. It was “too crowded” in NYC.
The first reviews are coming in on her new movie and they’re pretty awful. 27% on Rottentomatoes so far.
attention attention thats all she is about!!! now a stripper movie? she is not talented,not sexing,not funny…or pretty.
the ring is most beautiful and sexy. the dress is also so nice. a perfect match for that dress is only ‘she’ .
Very pretty woman, but if she doesn’t kick the butts soon she will end up with permanent ‘smoker face’
And that ain’t pretty!
When will women learn that they have to be very, very careful when it comes to dresses in the material? Unless you’re a 00 you’ll have a hard time pulling it off because the way shadow hits it always makes you look like a heifer. Designers need to just stop using it so much. It’s never flattering.