Kate Bosworth in black Christopher Kane at the ‘Big Sur’ premiere: budget or cute?

wenn20799945

Kate Bosworth met her husband Michael Polish when he directed her in Big Sur, a film adaptation of Jack Kerouac’s novel by the same name. That was 2011. It’s taken this long for the film to get any kind of release date. And here are the photos from the NYC premiere. I think this may be Kate and Michael’s first red carpet since their wedding in August? Maybe? Does marriage agree with her? She looks the same to me. She always has that haughty expression – I don’t get it, but sure.

Kate wore this Christopher Kane Spring 2014 dress which I find both boring and fug. Like, for me it’s usually either/or. Either I think the dress is interestingly fug or so boring I don’t even want to discuss it. It just seems like such a boring choice for a self-appointed “Fashion Girl” to wear a silky black slip-dress thing to her big premiere, but the details on it make it fug. That collar attachment is horrible. The hemline is off in several ways too – it needed to be a few inches longer and it needed to not be hemmed in such a budget way.

By the way, Polish recently directed The Bos’s commercial for her Topshop Collection. Why does he make his wife look like hell?

Also: I’m including photos of Balthazar and Rosetta Getty at the same premiere and OMG!!!! Now I feel bad about thinking The Bos looked so severe – Rosetta Getty can out-severe, out-bitchface any one of us. Rosetta had had Balthazar on total Dong Lockdown since the Sienna Miller stuff. She’s got Dong LoJack.

wenn20799937

wenn20799941

wenn20799951

wenn20800226

wenn20800227

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

32 Responses to “Kate Bosworth in black Christopher Kane at the ‘Big Sur’ premiere: budget or cute?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. AlexandraJane says:

    haha donglock down! Great description!

  2. bammer says:

    Why are they even wasting money on a film premiere for this crappy movie?

    She always looks the same. Beige & boring with a side of smug.

  3. Maureen says:

    Me no like her. Ever. 🙁

    Just look at that smug face. She really thinks she’s hot sh*t, she really does.

  4. Thinker says:

    Budget. And good gracious someone give the lady a sandwich!!

    Side note: Still can’t believe Bosworth settled for such a non-famous fellow. I would’ve thought she’d wait to lock a bigger fish.

    • Jen says:

      I think she’s genuinely in love/obsessed with her husband. They are seriously creepy, like one step away from the whole Angelina/Billy Bob vials of each other’s blood thing. And they both think they’re some great artist/must team even though all they do is make budget movies no one will see and terrible “fashion videos”.

      Plus, they can be anorexic together, so good for them.

      • Maureen says:

        This EXACTLY. And because each irrationally idolizes the other it only intensifies their own love of themselves. SHE think she’s hot sh*t because she’s with this TOTAL WINNER GENUIS DIRECTOR (in her eyes) and HE think he’s hot sh*t because he’s with this GORGEOUS FASHION MUSE (in his eyes). They’re co-dependent enablers for each other. Totally smug, totally arrogant.

    • Chrissy says:

      Her reputation proceeds her so no bigger fish will have her.
      Also, she looks damn old for 30 and what’s wrong with her arms?

  5. Rachel says:

    I want to feel bad for Rosetta Getty because no one told her her shirt is gapping open, but I’m afraid she’s already cursed me. Those photos are… harsh.

    • magpie says:

      I want to feel bad for Rosetta Getty, period. She has to be able to give the best b* face since everyone knows Sienna’s stank is there forever. I couldn’t believe she took him back.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        I can’t believe it either–I mean, theoretically speaking, we can forgive infidelity, but he didn’t just cheat on her. He was out and about w/Sienna, acting as though he were single. Like he didn’t have a family at home. That shows me how respectful he is to his wife, his children–even if they were temporarily separated or whatever, and he felt that he could “date”–he can’t be discreet about it?

        Just like w/Kristen. What got me was that she and Rupert Sanders were out in the open, not so much that they cheated. They were out in the open, in the middle of LA, where all the paps know what her car looks like, probably have the plate numbers already.

      • Veruca says:

        Her mandible is frightening. You could cut cheese with that jaw! As a rule, I’m usually not that superficial, but man!

    • campbell says:

      This! Please check your gaping blouse before you leave home, Rosetta. You scare me.

  6. Jay says:

    I can’t tell if Bosworth wants us to think she’s pregnant or if she just really didn’t realise how unflattering that waistline is.

  7. Cali says:

    Wow, she poses like a real star.

  8. Fan says:

    Beautiful and classy without posing hard.

  9. freya says:

    At least she kept her bony chest and legs covered. That always looks better. but I don’t understand why she has her hair so severely pulled back. it doesn’t do her any favors (it’s probably me, but her ears creep me out). Her hair looked better when she did the interview on The Today Show (I think? Idk, the pics on justjared, with the blue dress).

  10. Maya says:

    I think she’s incredibly beautiful (her cheekbones, her eyes) but also incredibly boring. Jezebel had a funny post the other day titled “Who the fuck gives a shit about Kate Bosworth?”, which I thought was pretty apt!

    • Maureen says:

      She USED to have a real girl-next-door, “all-American girl” beauty. But she got so haughty, so annoying, and then all the work done on her face and eating disorder….ugh, she’s ruined whatever natural beauty she had.

  11. TheOriginalKitten says:

    I find it sad that we have a post today about the “thigh gap” and the harm that comes with shaming women for their bodies, then we have a Bosworth post full of the predictable criticisms of her thin frame, even though so many commenters on that thread made the point that it’s women perpetuating this kind of behavior.

    If you want to hate her, fine, but why all the snarking on her body? Ugh. Women will never learn…smh..

    • Maureen says:

      She doesn’t eat. She is not just “thin”. She is horribly under-weight and that comes from not eating. And she doesn’t eat because fitting into fashionable clothes is more important to her than anything in life. She created this body and she WANTS us to look at her body, so why are we wrong to comment on what we see?

      • TheOriginalKitten says:

        …and you know all this how? Are you her bestie? A confidant? Or are you just letting your overwhelming hate for a total stranger override logic and sensibility?

        She “created” her body? She’s always been naturally thin. Always. Stop perpetuating the idea that she starves herself just because she doesn’t fit into your idea of a perfect body type.

      • cr says:

        @TheOriginalKitten: I don’t think Kate’s anorexic, but you can look at pictures of her over the past ten years and see that while yes , she is naturally slender and loses weight when stressed, she doesn’t appear to be this naturally slender. Even after she lost the muscle mass she gained for Blue Crush she looked healthily slender and natural. Post 2006 weight loss, even though she gained some of that back, she’s never looked as healthy as she did before.
        That’s where the criticism comes from, that this weight that she has now is not her natural weight and that it’s deliberate. Same criticism can be made of Jolie or Kruger.

  12. Kate says:

    She has the most beautiful skin. But that’s just about the only thing the girl has going for her. I don’t understand why she didn’t fade into obscurity years ago.

    Rosetta Getty look’s harsh. I never thought I’d see someone with more prominent bulimia jaw than Tracy Anderson and Bethenny Frankel.

  13. Gilmore says:

    I thought Kaiser was exaggerating about Rosetta’s bitch-face, but holy sh-t it’s truly scary! I feel like I should go book a session with my therapist because I’m scared sh-t less right now.

  14. Virgilia Coriolanus says:

    Oh Lord, that dress is U-G-L-Y. Ugly. It looks really cheap. If she’s such a fashion girl, why can’t she have her stylist get her better clothes?

    And that commercial is awful–she looked like death warmed over. And she had no charisma or anything at all, I could model those clothes better–she looked so bored and over it in the commercial.

  15. Mel says:

    That commercial made me laugh

  16. amilu says:

    Wow. I didn’t even recognize Balthazar Getty! I’ve never seen any of his more recent projects, so I haven’t kept up with how’s he’s aged over the years.

  17. els says:

    She looks so sad, why is she so sad?

  18. hanah says:

    AAAAAAH she’s so skinny its painful to look at

  19. sadie says:

    VERY late to this party, but there are 2 reasons Rosetta took him back. 1) Because of the kids, and 2) because of his money (Getty).

  20. Vl says:

    Daybreakers was on last night, her face and ears looks eerily similar to a “stage 4”.