Gisele Bundchen in Atelier Versace at the WSJ Awards: gorgeous or basic?

FFN_Bunchen_Gisele_GGFF_110613_51254018

Here are some photos of Gisele Bundchen at last night’s Wall Street Journal “Innovator of the Year” Awards at MoMA in NYC. Gisele was the cover girl on the WSJ’s “Innovator Issue” (I’m including some of the Terry Richardson photoshoot at the end of the post), so I guess that’s why they asked her to the event. Gisele wore Atelier Versace. Thoughts? I like the color. And Gisele has the (crazy!) body for Versace. But… it’s sort of weird, right? Obviously, Gisele looks fierce, but I feel like whatever is happening with her boobs is very uncomfortable. Still, I can’t believe she’s had two babies. Crazy.

FFN_Bunchen_Gisele_GGFF_110613_51254011

Here are some photos from Daft Punk and Gisele’s cover shoot for the WSJ Magazine’s “Innovators Issue”. The shoot is by Terry Richardson, which means that it’s pretty basic. Surprisingly enough, it’s not grossing me out even though the lighting, as always, reminds me of budget p0rn. Mostly I’m sketched out by how Daft Punk is getting kind of gropey with Gisele. You can read Daft Punk’s WSJ interview here.

gis1

gis2

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet and the Wall Street Journal.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

41 Responses to “Gisele Bundchen in Atelier Versace at the WSJ Awards: gorgeous or basic?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. NeNe says:

    I do not think there is anything ‘basic’ about this woman.

  2. aims says:

    Her body is insane. I’ve always said this about her, body of a goddess face of a horse.

    • Cristina says:

      Exactly what I was going to say, her body is insane! She is flawless. Her face is not that bad:)
      But back to her body, the woman looks amazing. Especially in those nude photos she did for Vogue Paris that everyone’s talking about now.

    • Original N says:

      Wow! You captured my thoughts precisely. Her body is amazing; I am filled with complete envy whenever I review photographs of her … until I see her face. Then, I’m quite happy with myself (I’m shorter, so it’s hard not to envy that tall, lithe figure). So, I just cannot use the word gorgeous in the same sentence as Gisele, unless it applies only to her body.

    • Spooks says:

      Her face isn’t pretty at all. It isn’t even model-weird looking. It’s just plain.

  3. Kate says:

    Wow. Her body is … wow. I’m a bit speechless.

  4. Eve says:

    Looks great.

    I’ve never been a fan of her torso (it’s very straight and narrow — this dress actually gives her a waist she doesn’t usually have). But her legs are flawless.

    P.S.: Hair and makeup are perfect, too.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      Morning, my sweets.

      But her torso is so loooong! Those of us with short torsos live in envy of this woman.

      • Eve says:

        Morning, Kitt.

        I know, her body is perfect for fashion. But, for instance, I find Miranda Kerr’s torso prettier (it’s long as well, but there’s more of a waist).

        Her legs, as I already said, are flawless. And I don’t think she’s a “buttaface” — yes, her features are getting harsher as she ages, but she has a pretty face, in my opinion.

    • arabella says:

      omg totally agree. She’s always posing sideways to create a waist, but if you watch her walk on the runway, she has no waist. So yes she does have a great bod but she’s not really an hourglass. I think Halle Berry has the perfect bod, for example.

  5. Dawn says:

    We should all be so lucky. I think she is beyond gorgeous.

    • TheOriginalKitten says:

      ITA. I don’t get the “horse face” thing at all. I think she’s effin gorgeous, especially when she’s not talking 😉

      • mytbean says:

        I think she looks Greek… and I’ve always thought Greek women were gorgeous; Permanent tans and strong features… I don’t think she looks “horsey” but she is exotic!

    • lana86 says:

      she looks a lot like that wife-chick from Breaking bad, doesnt she?

  6. blue marie says:

    She looks gorgeous, always.

  7. Erm says:

    She is simply stunning. I think her face is gorgeous.

  8. PunkyMomma says:

    Pea green with envy.

  9. Bored suburbanhousewife says:

    Her face strangely resembles a super elongated veraio of Anna Gunn

  10. Miss M says:

    Stunning!

  11. Jegede says:

    The last Supermodel.
    The darker hair makes her look so much better

  12. Garrett says:

    Maybe it’s just me, but to me, she always comes off as some snobby b*ch.

  13. Flora Kitty says:

    That dress looks better on her than Kim K.

  14. Amory says:

    I think she has exactly the body to wear this dress. This dress is not for someone with a large chest, although I can see some of the fuller-figured people trying to wrestle into. As for looks, I’ve never thought she was all that. Her face is long and narrow, and I prefer faces that are a bit softer. But to each his own, and she has had a great career.

  15. kittychi says:

    Gorgeous shoes with it too! +++++++++

  16. Feebee says:

    Very few of the supermodels were classically beautiful. For arguments sake I’ll use Grace Kelly as an example. Christy Turlington was close and Naomi Campbell too but they all had interesting (gorgeous) faces to go with their impressive figures. Not to mention the X factor Gisele undoubtably has… Until she speaks at least.

  17. Grant says:

    I love that dress/skirt. Love, love, love, love, love.

  18. umyeah says:

    She is definitely a butterface. Her body rocks. Face, not so much.

  19. poppy says:

    WSJ must be desperate -not sure how she fits into the whole innovators idea.
    very pandering.

  20. GIRLFACE says:

    I must say, I love the designs with the Daft Punk helmets but yeah, I’m not sure how she fits the theme at all. Her body is amazing. I think her face is beautiful and unique, I like that she doesn’t fit the “classic beauty” bill.

  21. crab says:

    Oh please!! That woman is gorgeous from head to toe!!!

  22. glaugh says:

    Unbelievably gorgeous and glowing. She is just perfect! Her body is bangin. she needs to put out a yoga or pilates dvd.

  23. Kelly says:

    I hate her because she’s bloody perfect. I wanna kidnap her and swap brains. The best celeb body out there, hands down.

  24. BooBooLaRue says:

    OMG why does this woman annoy me so much? That horse face!

  25. Harriet says:

    I always find it interesting how people here think she has an awful face. The general consensus is that being a fashion supermodel (the real kind not the sports illustrated variety of squashed boobs and high cut thongs) means she should look like a Barbie doll. It’s not a beauty pageant!!! Kate Moss has a rictus smile, Helena Christensen looks weird sometimes, Claudia Schiffer has buck teeth. Not talking about Gisele anymore but sometimes distinctly ‘wrong’ features make someone look more attractive. Anyway back to Gisele: banging body, interesting features, and speaks her mind rather than what her PR manager tells her to say.

    • Miss M says:

      Co-sign!

      ps: I love my features, but I would not complain if I had an “ugly” face like hers. 🙂

    • Spooks says:

      The thing is, she doesn’t have an interesting face like the models you’ve mentioned. I don’t find KAte’s face pretty, but it’s very interesting and versatile. Gisele doesn’t have that. She’s just plain.