Amal Alamuddin changes her name to Amal Clooney, flies to Greece for work

wenn21779194

Amal Alamuddin has officially changed her name. I guess. Apparently, her law firm now has her listed as “Amal Clooney.” Whoa. I thought that if there was a name change, it would be hyphenated, like Amal Alamuddin-Clooney. Or they could just bite the bullet and both change their names to Alamooney (which would be amazing). Branding is everything and you have to show loyalty to your brand. That’s why so many people still refer to Duchess Kate as “Kate Middleton” and why I’ll always think of Amal as Amal Alamuddin. I learned how to spell her last name and everything!

Anyway, Amal Clooney (ugh!) has officially gone back to work. The honeymoon is over. First George flew to New York for Comic-Con and now Amal is in Greece, trying to help them get the Parthenon Marbles/Elgin Marbles back from the British Museum.

As she gets back to work, Amal Alamuddin has a big new case – and a new name, too. Listed as “Amal Clooney” on the website for her London-based firm, Doughty Street Chambers, the new wife of George Clooney arrived in Athens, Greece, on Monday to meet with Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras and various culture officials throughout the week.

Her agenda: discussing Greece’s long-running, ill-fated bid to win back a collection of classical Greek marble sculptures variously known as the Parthenon Marbles or the Elgin Marbles from the British Museum in London. The move comes amid mounting pressure on the British Museum to return the marble masterpieces lining the walls of its Duveen Gallery since British diplomat Thomas Bruce, the 7th Earl of Elgin, removed them from the Acropolis more than 200 years ago. Earlier this month and after repeated pleas, UNESCO, the United Nations’ culture organization, called on the British government to enter mediation talks with Greece to settle one of the world’s biggest cultural property disputes.

Clooney, 36, will advise the Greek government on its “legal options,” government officials said. She will be accompanied by a delegation of Doughty Street Chambers barristers led by Geoffrey Robertson, the human rights lawyer who successfully argued for the return of Tasmanian Aboriginal artifacts from Britain’s Natural History Museum. Both were part of a legal team the Greek government approached four years ago in an initial consultation.

“Options,” says Vassilis Tavonis, a senior culture ministry advisor handling the Parthenon Marbles dispute in Athens, “is the operative word dominating this week’s meetings.”

So is “hysteria,” a Greek word gripping the country and international media as Clooney descends on the Greek capital. She isn’t expected to begin talks until Tuesday, but television crews already have been staked out around the airport for hours, with details of her visit dominating the news.

“The media frenzy and uproar alone will be beneficial [for Greece],” says a senior government official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of his proximity to the talks. “It will recast international attention on the case [of the Parthenon Marbles] and the injustice that has been done.”

It’s unclear whether Athens will hire Amal Clooney and her London-based firm for the mediation talks. By some accounts, cash-strapped Greece was unable to pay the legal team’s consultation fee four years ago, at the height of the country’s fiscal crisis. Now, though, Clooney is returning with one strict request: that the government in Athens stick to business alone, refraining from offering her – or her husband – even a token wedding gift.

[From People]

Hm. I wonder where George is now? Did he fly back to London to see Amal off? Did he return home to LA? Will he join Amal in Greece? I need to know! Oh, and considering how we’re all new to this name change, can we not refer to Amal as no-first-name “Clooney” just yet? For decades now, whenever People Mag wrote about a “Clooney,” it was George. This is going to take some getting used to.

FFN_Clooney_Alamuddin_SGP_092614_51540026

wenn21772475

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

201 Responses to “Amal Alamuddin changes her name to Amal Clooney, flies to Greece for work”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Lindy79 says:

    The pics of her arriving to her job are insane. I’m thinking (and hoping) it’s not just because she’s there and just because it’s a very high profile case in Greece?

    The cynic in me thinks she looks like she’s REALLY enjoying the attention.

    • LB says:

      I’ll join the cynic in you. She definitely appears to enjoy the attention.

    • Jessica says:

      There’d be that much press there anyway, it’s a big deal. That Amal’s there just means the photo’s and video will go to more tabloidy sources as well as proper news services.

      Geoffrey Robertson looks like he’s enjoying the attention just as much. Barristers in general tend to be the type of people who are very comfortable being the center of attention. Given what her job involves and how many times she’s had to face a barrage of press walking out of court, I’m not sure why the fact she’s fine with it surprises or bothers people. I mean, when she was representing Assange she literally had hundreds of photographers right in her face, pushing and shoving, and she kept her game face on and didn’t even flinch. The pap attention she’s gotten since Clooney is mild compared to that.

      • carole says:

        But the press was focused on Assange not her.

      • Jessica says:

        Right, but my point was she was walking right next to him, in the thick of it, and she’s experienced that with other clients as well. So it’s not like she’s never dealt with the press before. She’s been around very aggressive paparazzi a lot before, she’s filmed interviews and she’d gotten some press attention in her own right long before George came along. Given all that I don’t understand why anyone would expect her to be anything but comfortable with the attention.

      • jane16 says:

        Good point Jessica.

    • Brrrrr says:

      So? I mean she is a lawyer not a milk maid. Why should she be some retiring wall flower? To fit some archaic idea of what smart girls should look or act like? I’m happy for her to enjoy all the attention she likes, as long as she keeps making a meaningful impact on the world around her. Get those Elgin Marbles, Amal.

      • Lindy79 says:

        I never said she should be like anything, nor do I have an ideal of what a “smart girl” should look or act like. I just stated that she seemed to be enjoying the attention. There is a difference between dealing with it and enjoying it. That is all.

      • CC says:

        It’s actually better if she enjoys the attention, IMO. It’s a lot work if you’re getting unwanted attention.

        If anything, all of this will raise the profile of her case, which might not have happened otherwise. You certainly don’t hear that much nowadays about Egypt’s claims against both the UK and France over stolen Egyptian artifacts in the British Museum and Louvre (and obelisks in both Paris and London).

        If I were her, I’d be VERY happy about that.

    • CandyKay says:

      It’s good if she enjoys the attention, since it’s attention she’s going to be getting from now on. When you marry George Clooney, you should be the type of person who enjoys being photographed. Remember when JFK Jr. married that poor girl who hated publicity? Miserable for both of them.

      • Jessica says:

        Right? If she was being photographed hiding her face and looking annoyed this site would be full of people saying she’s an idiot for marrying George if she’s not comfortable getting attention like that.

    • Bucky says:

      I don’t really understand what’s wrong with enjoying the attention?

      • Really says:

        You see the Brangeloonatics here love it when their favourite couple gets attention and poses but they are angry when Amal enjoys it while doing an actual job. She has gotten more attention than that other wedding and they are pissed off and call her a famewhore.

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        All the other women who enjoyed the attention were called famewhores.
        She comes off like the same IMO

      • Lena says:

        Well the main reason that wedding got more attention is because it was shoved down our throats before, during, and after! You get more attention when you tell the press every last detail.
        Brad & Angelina need not call the press to showcase their pre-wedding prep. They did it quietly and without fanfare. Their wedding still was trending worldwide, Clooney’s never did.

        And most people still do not know or care who Amal is.

      • Lindy79 says:

        I’m not a Brad or Angelina fan…Just saying

      • Nedsdag says:

        She’s giving an issue publicity more than herself. Isn’t that what “St. Angelina” is doing with her causes? Double standard again.

      • boredblond says:

        Lena__+10. The private ceremony screamed class, while the never-ending circus just screamed, and they’re gonna keep on screaming because a week without People and brit news coverage simply won’t be tolerated. Getting marbles for Greece isn’t a cause, it’s a job..and hardly touches the realm of ‘human rights’

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Really …

        No one here is hating on Amal, they are simply expressing their wonderful, Deus given right to gossip. This isn’t Female First (I’ve read the exact same sentiments there almost word for word to your post, so I’m not arbitrarily labeling). People at “Celebitchy” are actually allowed and encouraged to voice opinions about other celebrities without referencing heir comments to Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, or Jennifer Aniston. Welcome! It’s a brave new world. 🙂

      • Brrrrr says:

        I keep wondering why Amal gets so much bile here. Shes a self-assured, accomplished, beautiful woman. She actually deserves the attention, doesnt act all twee about it and could actually do something meaningful with those cameras following her about. Shes exactly what people here keep longing for.

        So yes, I buy the Branje theory……argh! But Loons, is Amal doing anything that Angie hasnt done for years? Have you not seen footage of her climbing over Brad for the cameras? Set up pap shots of her leaving a “business meeting” with her ring on show? Why the double standard?

        Amal is new to this, its fine that shes having fun with it. And the woman actually has a job that requires some serious brain cells, the novelty will wear off soon and she’ll leave the camera work to the Angies, Jens and Kims.

    • Enuff Said says:

      Love love love her fashion style since becoming Mrs. I want everything she’s worn!!! I so miss Princess Diana’s style – not that they’re similar in any way – just women who exude fashion sense that suits them!

      • Sassy says:

        There was a video on DM yesterday where she made some comments to the press. She sounded (to me) very much like Princess Diana. Totally English accent. I don’t know what I expected, perhaps a middle Eastern accent. Something exotic.

    • emmie_a says:

      She LOVES the attention and is the very definition of famewhore. She’s been seeking out the spotlight and prepping for this her entire career. Can’t stand her.

      • SunnyD says:

        I don’t understand this. Are you saying she entered the legal word with the intention of landing herself a Hollywood A Lister husband? Law really isn’t that glamourous (I am a lawyer) and if she was really after attention and seeking out the limelight wouldn’t she have entered an actually glamourous profession?

      • Mary Mary says:

        Emmie: The publicity draws attention to newsworthy international cases. The media helps to shine the spot light on international injustice. Then, why the hell not?

        She prepped to be a succesful lawyer. Accomplished that. The celebrity A lister marriage enhances the work she does, such as helping Greece to reclaim the Parthenon Marbles.

        By, the way, the London’ law firm that Amal works dates back to February, 2011, when the head of the International Association for the Reunification of the Parthenon Marbles asked Norman Palmer, a lawyer specializing in cultural heritage issues and who won the case for the return of aboriginal remains to Australia from London’s Natural History Museum, to explore Greece’s legal options. He requested help from one of the major legal firms in London.

        Famewhore? Absolutely, not. She is being name called for doing her job.

        Alamuddin graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Jurisprudence (Oxford’s equivalent to the LLB) from St. Hugh’s College, Oxford.

        In 2001, she entered New York University School of Law to study for the Master of Laws degree. While at NYU, Amal worked as a student law clerk for now-Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor, who was then a judge at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. After graduating from NYU, she joined the litigation department of Sullivan & Cromwell in New York and practiced U.S. and international law there for three years,

        2013, Alamuddin was appointed to a number of United Nations commissions

        Paparazzi covers her while she works on legal cases.

        Amal handles the attention well.

      • Somenestolemyname says:

        George can make Amal famous,but what he can’t do is make the Public warm to her or even like her , if they are finding that they don’t.
        And….judging by over 1000 comments in just the Daily Mail alone, and in fact public messages from Newspapers I’ve read from around the world and also various magazines ,a lot of the public hasnt especially warmed to her.

        Credentials and degrees can’t make a person likeable or make the public warm to a person.
        George’s Public Relations and press pumping of her can only do so much, it can make Her a recognizable face or name ,make the public aware of the person, but then the rest is left to the public’s own judgement.

        You can lead a horse , but you can’t MAKE the horse drink the kool aid.

      • Emma - the JP Lover says:

        @Someonestolemyname …

        Eloquently said! I totally agree with you. I don’t know why people are trying to make this into something it’s not. Amal is beautiful, smart, and fashionable but the speed of the PR Clooney wedding ‘is’ fodder for the gossip mill … and the public is feeding. 🙂

    • kri says:

      Agreed,she is loving it.

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I don’t know if we’d be able to tell the distinction between someone who handles attention well and someone who loves attention. I think they would look very similar.

      • Atticus says:

        That is quite possibly the most sensible comment I’ve seen….truly. Well said!

      • Belle says:

        I’m not so sure. It seems that someone who handles the attention well would just go about their business, not hiding or being annoyed… just being polite and doing their thing. Posing, waving, finding the cameras for said posing and waving… seems a bit more like loving the attention. Might as well start blowing kisses.

      • Tiffany :) says:

        Thank you, Atticus.

    • Chris says:

      A lot of people enjoy attention. They find it validating.

  2. Colton says:

    In some pictures she is a babe and in others not cute at all…
    good for her. At least Clooney is easier to spell?

    • epiphany says:

      Go to D-listed and see the photos of her prior to her cosmetic surgery.

    • kellitoo says:

      Her pre surgery pics on dlisted today are something. Lesson: girls, get to a plastic surgeon because looks always come first, and a celebrity name will insure attention. Will they be renaming the law firm to reflect the vast importance of this second chair?

      • Cora says:

        Whoa I just saw her pre-surgery photo on dlisted! She looks so different. That was a lot of nose she had removed.

        @Seapharris7 – the photo is in the comment section under Michael K’s post about Amal returning to work (Oct 13).

      • snowflake says:

        i dont see them?

      • Tanguerita says:

        Whoa, that’s a LOT of nose going on there!

      • Someonestolemyname says:

        Do u have a link, I searched and the site is confusing. The same article kept popping up but not the pre surgery story

      • Seapharris7 says:

        Finally found them, you have to navigate through 400 comments… And her surgery was definitely an improvement. What disturbs me way more is her being in a photo with Sam Lufti.

    • kibbles says:

      I don’t think she is a natural beauty. It’s all clothes, makeup, hair extensions, and plastic surgery.

      • Mare says:

        I don’t see a problem with that. Not everyone is naturally beautiful. Why not take what you have and make the best of it with the help of make-up, clothes and, yes, even some plastic surgery if you want.

      • Jay says:

        @ Mare… Sure no big deal. Some makeup. Some clothes. Some going-under-life-threatening-general-anesthesia for vanity.

        But really, the inability of people to recognize that surgery comes with great risk is just sad. It’s not a casual thing like makeup and clothes. The lengths people will go to for a slightly smaller nose is depressing.

      • snowflake says:

        @ Jay, I contemplated suicide at one point because of comments about my nose. you don’t know how cruel people can be. I had a guy at a bar one time telling his friends how he wouldn’t go out with me because of my nose. I’ve had virtual strangers ask me how I broke my nose. I’ve had so many people comment or make nasty comments about it. Other than my nose, I am pretty. I have clear skin, pretty eyes and a nice body (so I’ve been told). but my nose has kept a lot of men from dating me. I tried getting it fixed by plastic surgery. I was told by several board certified doctors that they could not do it, it would go back, My self-esteem was so low. I mean it’s on your face, it’s not like you can hide it or cover it up.

        Like i said, i considered suicide. I found a doctor who did fix it. He was not able to make it totally straight but it was a million times better. After about 4 years, I could see it gradually going back to the way it was. It was very upsetting to me, I did not want to go through this shit again, I again contemplated suicide. But I thought, I can commit suicide, but I’ll hurt my mom, my family. So now I just live with it. but it just sucks, you know. I would risk going under again. It’s not just the matter of a smaller nose. it’s the inability of others to see beyond how you look that hurts and makes you want to fix it. I hate my nose and honestly, I think sometimes about trying to get it fixed again.

  3. Abbott says:

    George Alamuddin has a better ring to it.

  4. mkyarwood says:

    ‘I’m all Clooney’.

  5. Jules says:

    I am so over this…………….

  6. Tiffany27 says:

    Alamuddin is an awesome last name though. She should have kept it. My boyfriend and I have already decided if we have kids they’ll have my last name. Ah well, Amal Clooney it is.

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I loved her last name too, especially as it flowed with her first name. That was a beautiful line of syllables!

  7. AG-UK says:

    Give me back my marbles….

    • Sixer says:

      I’ve never had any marbles to lose! (About time we gave the ancient capital M marbles back, in my opinion).

    • CG says:

      When I was living in Europe in the mid ’90s, MTV Europe had this live late night talk show hosted by Ray Cokes (I think?) that I used to watch every night. He would take calls and one night a Greek guy called in to complain about the Elgin Marbles and RC dead-panned to the camera, “You mean you’ve lost your marbles?” And the Greek guy obviously didn’t get the expression and was like, “Yes and we want them back!” Kid me thought it was hilarious. And your post reminded me of it! 🙂

  8. QQ says:

    Ehng! I woulda (AND HAVE when I married!) kept a Very Musical Last name that sings with my name (also if she woulda been a Lawyer in the US is also a notoriously difficult thing to do here!) BUT its her prerrogative and also she comes from a traditional culture, Im sure her people woulda blanched out if she didnt (much like my folks did when I didnt change or hyphenated at least!)

    • Etheldreda says:

      But taking your husband’s name is not at all ‘traditional’ in the Middle East. Most Arab women do not take their husband’s name.

      • AG-UK says:

        My boss is Lebanese wife is from Kuwait and she kept her name.

      • Etheldreda says:

        Women from the Gulf countries always keep their own names. I lived there for years, and the girls I talked to found it somewhat odd that women in other parts of the world changed their names on marriage. I think the situation isn’t as clear-cut in other parts of the Arab world, but I do think most Arab women, particularly if they’re Muslim, keep their names on marriage.

      • DiamondRottweiler says:

        This is really the biggest part I can’t with her. An accomplished woman with a serious vocation decides that in the 21st century taking a “property” name based on medieval notions of women as commodities is the way to go? And I hear this from so many women who plan to have kids–“Oh, I don’t want my child to struggle with having a different last name than their mother…” I mean, if this is a great struggle for your kid, they will be one hopelessly special snowflake indeed.

      • CC says:

        lol, I always find it so funny, the justification that they change their names so that their kids’ name will match.

        If the kids get the mother’s name, there you go: problem solved!

        Everyone, of course, allowed to allow the kids to be named after their father, but that’s not a legal requirement, it’s them letting it happen.

      • Natty says:

        Why should any woman have to justify what name she chooses to call herself? I’m an “accomplished woman with a serious vocation” who got married in the 21st century and decided to change my name. I understand the (distasteful) origins of the tradition, but I decided to change my name for my own reasons that have nothing to do with being my husband’s “property” (and since I had my father’s name before that, would it really have been better to keep my maiden name?). i have lots of friends and colleagues who chose not to change their names and plenty who did — it’s a totally personal choice. You just can’t with Amal changing her name, but I just can’t with women who can’t abide other adults making their own choices.

    • DiamondRottweiler says:

      Oh sure, Natty. Nobody needs to justify anything to me. Certainly not. But I also have the freedom to think it’s at the very least archaic and sends a very misguided message. Language has power beyond our individual choices. You know, Cixous, the signifier and the signified, etc. And just because someone says,”Well, in *my* case it doesn’t signify an ownership relationship” doesn’t mean that’s how it’s perceived culturally, or that it doesn’t perpetuate the idea of woman as property. And the “lots of people do it” argument isn’t a very good argument. But like I said, no justification needed.

    • Chris says:

      My ex wife and step daughter kept their last names. The two boys we had together took my surname. So it was kinda cool. The boys had the Dad’s surname the girls had the mum’s.

  9. NewWester says:

    Maybe their critics are wrong and George married Amal because they are in love? I have to admit there is a part of me that still thinks George is setting the groundwork for some big announcement.

  10. PunkyMomma says:

    Let me try this out:
    Lady Amal Clooney
    First Lady of California, Amal Clooney
    Congressman George Clooney and his wife, Amal Clooney
    Ambassador George Clooney and his wife Amal Clooney
    Hmmmm.

    • Cora says:

      When Howard Dean was seeking nomination for presidential candidate, I remember the press giving his wife a very hard time because she kept her maiden name. As soon as I read that Amal changed her name to Clooney, George’s political ambitions immediately came to my mind.

      • starrywonder says:

        Or she could want the same last name as her husband. People do. My sister and sis in laws have all changed their last names. No one did hyphens though initially my sister thought about it but she decided she wanted to have the same last name as her husband and their now daughter.

      • Sunny says:

        Yes, lots of women choose to take their husband’s names as a marker of building a family together, for future children, because they hate their own last names and for a dozen other reasons. If she wants to change her name, good for her.

        However, I am surprised that she changed her name bc her high profile career. I think it would be hard to work in that sort of field, get name recognition and then opt to change that name.

      • Jadzia says:

        As a professional woman with a seriously bizarre first name, I don’t think changing her last name is as big a deal for her. First, the whole world knows who she is. Second, she has a pretty unusual first name, at least in the London barrister community. I am guessing that there are probably not many other barristers in her field with the first name and thus, the name recognition issue doesn’t matter much.

        At least this is what I told myself when I changed my own name, notwithstanding my diplomas and publications and etcetera that are all in my maiden name. That I really don’t think there are a lot of other people with this first name, doing what I do, and so it didn’t matter.

        Ugh, I just had to defend her. Not as vociferously as she seems to defend every human rights abuser that she can find, though.

      • Alexis says:

        I’m engaged and plan to take my fiance’s last name (keeping my maiden name as a middle name). Part of my reasoning is that we’re an intercultural couple and it makes it easier for people to identify us as a couple and identify us with our future kids (which may resemble one of us or the other). Perhaps Amal and George had the same idea.

    • kri says:

      Hmmmm, indeed punky. how bout Amb. Amal Clooney and her husband? You are def on the right track.

  11. Zainab says:

    The mags should call her …. Clooney 2

    Y’ know, like ….. Psycho 2 😉

  12. SunnyD says:

    Professional woman returns to work after getting married. Oh and she has apparently changed her name.

    As I see it she has chosen to continue her presumably fulfilling and intellectually stimulating career, working on a case I expect has been pencilled into her diary for months. What has she done wrong exactly?

    • Luca76 says:

      Entirely too logical 😄

    • epiphany says:

      Apart from walking a red carpet and having a photo-op on her way to the office, absolutely nothing.

      • Luca76 says:

        As a poster above noted given the high profile of the case there would have been press at her arrival and coverage in Greece & UK even if there are more and they are getting picked up by tabloids.

      • epiphany says:

        Yeah, Greek antiquities always draw a big crowd. Has nothing to do with her media soaked wedding to a celebrity. Nothing.

      • SunnyD says:

        Yes quite. And how is being papped on her way to work a photo op? Frankly if I was her I’d want to look half decent, knowing that my hair, make up, clothes etc would all be judged.

      • Jessica says:

        It’s a HUGE deal in Greece right now, it’s a pretty big story in the UK, and depending on how it all plays out in the end, it could have worldwide ramifications. It was already getting loads of press before Amal was even known to be working on it.

      • carisel says:

        Actually, this case has been garnering international attention for decades. It has certainly gained speed again in the past few years because the Greek government decided they wanted to get litigious more recently. If anyone is actually interested in what’s going on, both Vanity Fair and The New Yorker did excellent pieces on this story within the last couple of years. They both have wonderfully accessible archive pages on their respective websites.

        I don’t see her as “enjoying” the attention. I just see a self-assured woman who is not afraid to be the educated, professional woman that she is. We need more of that in this world, without the need to tear them down.

    • carole says:

      She chose to marry a man who turned their personal story into an advertisement.

      Now they both will pay the price for reducing themselves to the level of the Kardashians.

    • Tiffany :) says:

      I agree SunnyD. I don’t get the outrage.

  13. Kelly says:

    What kind of a grown woman in this day and age changes her name to a man’s? She is 36 years old and has a stellar career. Your name is your identity, and it sends a sorry signal to other women, young girls, and your children that your name is less worthwhile than the man’s you marry. While celebrities are not role models, this is an epic high-profile fail.

    • maybeiamcrazy says:

      That is an overreaction. If a woman chooses to change her last name, it doesn’t imply that she thinks she worths less than her husband. Some women change their last name so that all family have the same surname. Some people are ‘traditional’ and happy with it. Who are we to judge that? I would totally change my surname if my hypothetical future husband has a kick-ass surname. Last names don’t/shouldn’t worth shit either way.

    • Jegede says:

      Why should any woman live her life according to other people’s rules and conditions?

      Why would any young girl be waiting for a signal from Amal, Margaret Thatcher or anyone else as to what they ought to do or feel?

      I work and when I get married I intend to change my name.
      I don’t think I’m better or worse than anyone else for my own choice, or should seek permission from the sisterhood.

    • Lindy79 says:

      It shouldn’t matter if you keep it or change it, each to their own really so long as they’re not being forced to make the choice.

    • Jayna says:

      Tell that to Hillary Rodham Clinton. I work with plenty of female lawyers. Some changed their name immediately and some hyphenated their name or use both names without it hyphenated, but when introducing themselves on the record use their married name. Some didn’t change at first but eventually did. A name change does not take away all that you have worked for. One of my friends kept her name for like two years professionally and then changed over to her husband’s last name professionally when they went into practice together. They are both lawyers. There’s no right or wrong way to do it for your “career.” It’s whatever your personal preference is.

    • MissBB says:

      Agree with Kelly and PixieWitch. Of course she can change her last name, but it does give a bit of the impression that her name isn’t as valuable as his. I’m her age and I cannot imagine taking on my boyfriend’s last name if we marry. My name is a big part of my identity.

      • Diana says:

        I don’t know. I think if you think that women who take their husband’s names are demeaning themselves — it says more about your personal viewpoints than it does about them, tbh.

        I’ve never heard the argument that women who take their husband’s names think less of themselves. I kept my name, but everyone chooses what they choose for their own reasons, of which we have no inside knowledge about.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Oh, please. There is nothing wrong with taking your husband’s last name over your FATHER’S. It’s not as though you invented your own last name. I’m assuming it came from your father, who I assume was a man. It’s a choice, just like any other. Stop being so judgmental. It’s absolutely none of your your business, and it sends no signal about anything such thing to children. It sends the signal that you are one family. I know so many professional women your age who kept their FATHER’S last name, then had children and started hyphenating, then dropped their father’s last name altogether, because it’s a pain in the ass. If you want to keep your last name, keep it, but stop acting like you’re changing the world or making some huge statement about self worth.

      • D says:

        ” There is nothing wrong with taking your husband’s last name over your FATHER’S.”

        You mean taking your father-in-law’s name, right?

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        No, I mean that your last name as a child is your father’s name. If your father was John Smith, and you are Mary Smith, you still have a man’s last name. So if you marry Bob Jones and change your name to Mary Jones, you’re just trading one man’s name for another man’s name. It’s not like you’re keeping some unique name that never belonged to anyone but you.

      • D says:

        You stated: “There is nothing wrong with taking your husband’s last name over your FATHER’S.”

        Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say, “There is nothing wrong with taking your father-in-law’s last name over your FATHER’S.”

        Your argument really only seems relevant for women who say they don’t want a name that originated with a man — which is not the same thing as a woman refusing to change her name because she objects to participating in a custom she considers sexist and questionable. In other words, the issue is not “did the name originate with a man”, it’s “why is it the woman that’s expected to change her name to the man’s family name?”

        Most women I know who kept their name did so because of their strong connection to it – the name that was attached to them when they started existing in the world, feels to them like their name precisely because they’ve had it & identified with it always. In other words, those women feel the same way about their surnames as the vast majority of men do.

        For other women, their surnames also served to bind them to their culture, religion, &/or ethnic background in ways that were deeply meaningful to them.

        Unfortunately, however, it’s a pretty commonly held idea that men own their surnames, while women’s surnames are just temporary placeholders, on loan from their fathers, and somehow really aren’t theirs.

        That assumption is what underlies absurdities like the fact that as recently as 2011, a national survey found that over 70% of Americans believe that women should change their names upon marriage & over 50% believe that women should be legally forced to change their names.

        Or that it’s incredibly difficult for men to legally adopt their wife’s surnames – because our culture believes that men’s names are an inherent, permanent part of their identities that are theirs to pass on.

        “It’s not really your name anyway!” pretty much always seems to be only directed at women. Specifically women who choose not to change their names, usually to suggest that there is something illegitimate, silly, pointless, etc. about their attachment to their names.

        Perhaps we should start telling boys & men “It’s not really your name anyway!”, considering the fact that the vast majority of them (in the U.S., at least) are entitled enough to expect that their wives will take their surnames & over 85% of them say they would not consider taking their wife’s name. It seems like they’re the ones who really need to hear it.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Oh, D, I see what you’re saying. Sorry I completely misunderstood. Yes, you make several excellent points. My point was addressed to the idea that your surname should not come from a man’s. And you’re right. A man’s surname comes from a man’s name as well. I never meant to imply that there is anything silly about a woman’s attachment to her original surname. I was attached to mine, and yes, it was a part of my identity. But there IS something silly about saying that by taking your husband’s surname, you are sending a message to young girl’s that “your name is less worthwhile than the man’s you marry.” At least in my opinion. Everybody’s name came from another person’s, probably a man’s. If you are attached to yours and want to keep it, you have my full support. But don’t tell me what to do about it.

        My husband offered to change his last name to mine because it’s a prettier name, and we thought about it, but decided to just use his. It was important to me that we have the same name. But I refuse to accept the idea that this choice means I’m less of a person, less of a full partner and less of a feminist. That’s all.

      • L says:

        @D 100% exactly! Thank you for saying it much more eloquently than I did.

      • CC says:

        Given that it’s basically impossible to have a woman’s surname, for the reasons stated above, I have this rule for myself: I’ll want the name of whomever is my family (as in extended, permanent, unbreakable way). In my case, that’s my mother’s family, and yes, her (previous) last name, since she changed when married, and kept my father’s name in divorce (40 years of her adult life being known as that surname).

        In fact, I despise my father so much that I’ve always wanted to remove his name and use solely the one that comes from mother’s side, for symbolism, and making it clear that I don’t consider him my family. It’s incredibly tough to be forced to live with a surname you hate that came from a person you hate (and no, hate isn’t strong enough in this case).

        I wouldn’t change to any man’s surname out of principle, and mostly because I saw that my mom did and how things turned out for her, however everyone at some point you have to draw the line and decide which last name you feel comfortable with. For whichever reason. If you have shitty parents, I’m sure you’ll have no 2nd thought about taking his name, if anything, to disassociate yourself from people you dislike. No 2 cases are exactly alike, or motivations. If that means your husband’s name, well, your choice (as long as it’s the woman’s choice, complete free will). Just bites when society tries to make a woman’s choice for her.

    • starrywonder says:

      Good lord take it down several notches. I have been working for 34 years and am known professionally by my first and last night. That said if I find the right guy and we get married I would change my name. That simple. It’s a name and I am still me.

    • Lucy2 says:

      A woman who wants to. It’s her choice.

    • Luca76 says:

      This is the kind of judgmental BS that makes women reluctant to call themselves feminists for fear of spewing out this kind of malarkey. Don’t believe in changing your name after marraige then don’t change it. You have no right to judge another woman for her choice.

      • lizziebee93 says:

        This is not feminism, and I say that as a feminist. She’s just being judgmental.
        Live and let live, @Kelly. If it is your decision not to change your father’s name for your husband’s then so be it, but don’t be capricious with people you don’t know, or don’t know their motivations for doing it. It’s things like this that makes me glad that I have both my parents last name. Though if my husband/wife happens to have a cooler last name I might decide to change it.

    • L says:

      I didn’t change my name and that’s fine. My sister did and that’s fine to. My aunt hyphenated. Different strokes, and everyone of us are strong independent women. There’s nothing wrong with any of those decisions, they all have merit. Don’t want to change your name? Don’t. Don’t want to keep it? Don’t.

      I also just want to add that I really really hate it when people say ‘oh it’s your father’s name’ when I mention that I’ve kept my surname. No, it is MY name. I own it and it has been mine for years-NOT my father. At what point as women do we get to own our own names and own our own identities? Why does it always have to belong to a man? Dad/Husband whatever. Your maiden name belongs to you-it just also happens to belong to your other family members as well. Just like if you change it your married name belongs to you-it also happens to belong to other family as well.

      • LAK says:

        …..but using your FATHER’s name and switching to your HUSBAND’s name is all part of the centuries old patriarchal societal traditions that say a woman has no right to their own identity and are the property of the males in the family. think about it. The very tradition of being GIVEN AWAY by your FATHER to your HUSBND is part and parcel of the centuries old indoctrination.

        There are cultures in the world, Arab and African, where babies are given their own name. That name is uniquely their own and doesn’t change on marriage. No one thinks it’s strange that everyone in the family has different names. A custom that has been in place for centuries.

        People in the west hold on to these demeaning patriarchal customs in the name of tradition without really thinking about what they are perpetuating and then cry personal rights when it’s pointed out to them. Heck, they even invoke a convoluted version of feminism to justify perpetuating a system that emphasises their lack of identity that reduces them to a possession owned by the males in the family.

        Funny, no one ever chooses to switch from their father’s name to their mother’s name and on marriage very few men consider changing or hyphenating their names to their wives’ names nor in discussions about parents having the same last name as their children is there a discussion that the mother’s name should be taken up by entire family rather than the father’s name.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        @L
        But your maiden name DOES come from your father. And it does become your own name, the same way my husband’s last name has become my name and part of my identity. I was just trying to point out to Kelly the irony of her disgust at a women having a man’s name. You can hate it all you want, and I get that you consider it your own name, and agree that it becomes a part of you, and you wanted to keep it, but it is silly to say you would never take a man’s name – because you already did.
        @LAK
        Could you be any more condescending? I chose to take my husband’s last name. It was not a “demeaning” decision to me. My husband treats me as an equal partner. Does it occur to you that these “enlightened” Arab and African countries where girl babies are given a unique last name have the worst treatment of women in the entire world? So, I’m not sure I follow your logic as to how those things relate. We have a right to our traditions whether you like them or not.

      • frisbeejada says:

        @ LAK – well said!

      • Jessica says:

        I know a lot of men who have their mother’s surname, and a lot of people who’ve changed their name from their fathers to their mothers. When I looked into changing my name that specifically (changing from father’s to mother’s) was one of the options you could choose for why you wanted to speak to someone at the Registry of Births Deaths and Marriages office, so it must be pretty common where I’m from.

        If I hadn’t of met my husband when I did I would have changed my surname to my maternal grandmother’s name, because I didn’t want either of my parents names and her name was the nicest I could choose from within my family. So now I have my husband’s name, but he has his mother’s surname (single mother), and she has her mothers (no clue who the father was).

      • Jegede says:

        @GoodNamesAllTaken –
        Agreed.

        I’m British Nigerian and all my female family members from Lagos to Ibadan, were professionals who took their husband’s name from my MD Mom to onwards…who knew who were all unwitting oppressed saps perpetuating abuse.

        And for the record in many African cultures your Christian name is given to you by family, mother and father. They come up with something to create your situation and place expectations on you with the moniker, which is why you have several names.
        They give you your name, which becomes a part of your identity.
        You don’t come up with it in your 30s

      • L says:

        It’s just absurd that even those my spouse’s name is also from his father-that everyone recognizes that it ‘belongs’ to him now. Everyone here has talked about how it is your husbands name. By the same logic shouldn’t it be described as his father in law’s name? But no- it’s his name that he claims ownership over.

        Meanwhile a woman’s name is NEVER ever her own. It’s either her husbands or her fathers. And I didn’t take it-it was given to me. And then it became mine, just like my husband’s name became his when it was given to him. If I had been given my mother’s name-it wouldn’t be my mother’s-it would be mine. If my parents had gotten together and chosen a new surname just for me-it would be mine.

        I’m just saying people should be free to own and accept who they are and how they choose to be named after marriage. It’s not about oh it’s your father/mother/spouses name-it’s about who you are and what you want your own name to mean and represent. It’s not that I wouldn’t take a man’s name-it’s that I wouldn’t change who I am because that is how I identify myself. And no one else should either if how they identify themselves are is a new last name be it mom’s, husband’s, wife’s, one they pick out of a magazine etc. Everyone can be a individual and make their own choices.

      • Maiden with Names says:

        My father took my mother’s name after marriage because hers was easier, so we have matrilineal descent here and glad of it. When people ask or note (why do they feel compelled to?) that I “kept” my maiden name (or even that my husband “let me” keep my maiden name – wowza), I respond ever-so-sweetly, “Yes, and I let my husband keep his.” That usually wraps it up.

        It is annoying that websites choose “mother’s maiden name” as a security measure. How presumptive. I’ve been challenged because my last name is the same as that of my mother — as if I don’t know the facts.

        If I’m challenged over the phone, I say, “Oh, my mother never was a maiden.”

        We can have fun with this and still make a point. For me, the hardest part is people from the USA assuming their way is the only way. This vexing issue of married names is handled differently all around the world, therefore all modes and formats are correct.

        Finally, Alamuddin is not a “funny,” “bizarre” or “weird” name. That’s not why she changed it. It’s not nice and it does sound prejudiced to insult non-English names simply because they reflect an unfamiliar language. To the Alamuddins of the world, names like “Clooney” and “Pitt” must sound pretty funny. All names are fine, normal and useful.

      • Miss Jupitero says:

        I know many women who have deliberately chosen new names for themselves for exactly these reasons. My pen name is chosen– one reason was that there was another writer out there who had the same name and people were confusing us, but I also discovered just how liberating it is to create your own unique name that is entirely yours.

      • CC says:

        @Jessica

        My situation is similar! My mother’s last name in fact came from his mother, since my grandfather was an illegitimate child whose father never recognised him.

        So it actually has a lot of symbolism to it, since, while it did come from a man 5 generations ago (my great-great-grandfather, whomever he was), and 3 ago (my granddad), the reason it was handed down was due to illegitimacy.

        Makes a nice symbol.

    • Um . . . I did. It’s a personal choice. I have friends who took their husbands’ names, friends who kept their own, and friends who came up with a new last name as a couple.

      Mostly, I just want to know the individual’s preference so that I call them by the correct name. I’m not bothered by what their choice is.

    • Anastasia says:

      I took my husband’s last name for a few reasons:

      1. My maiden name at the time was my adoptive stepfather’s name. I had only had it since I was seven. I didn’t want to be adopted by him, but no one asked me. He was a horrific alcoholic, and my bio father was cut out of my life (and not for any good reason, either–it was the 70s, things were weird). So I HATED my current maiden name when I married. I jokingly (bleak humor) called it my slave name.

      2. Married name was easier to pronounce and spell and I was about to start my teaching career–that was a big bonus.

      3. I was 21 when I married, so it’s not as if I had spent half a lifetime building a personal and professional life based on my maiden name.

      4. I was far more traditional back then, and wanted to take his name.

      Is that enough to satisfy you? I wish you had been around at the time to tell me what to do.

      P.S. Happily married 23 years in December.

      • Courtney says:

        Same here! I had my maiden name from ages 6-22. I’ve had my new name (husband’s) for 11 years now.

  14. Flora says:

    Of course she’s changed her name. That would be better for when George starts running for office. Whenever I see these 2 together, I instantly think of Mellie and Fitzy on Scandal. Talk about a marriage of convenience!

    • Mare says:

      I can’t see Clooney going into politics. Why would he do that? What would he gain that he doesn’t have now apart from more work and stricter life style?

      • jane16 says:

        This. Plus, George really loves his work. Relishes being in the movie business. I can’t see him giving it up.

  15. Seapharris7 says:

    I never felt either way about George… I’ve liked some of his movies & loved that he had a beloved pig, but this whole thing with the wedding has seriously got me annoyed with him. I cannot put my finger on exactly what it is that makes me so annoyed with him & almost violently hate her. The whole thing just reeks of a PR charade.

  16. Grrl says:

    Love her and the work she is doing for the marbles. Such a highly intelligent woman, a real force not to be messed with.

    • Jayna says:

      I think George has his hands full with her. LOL She seems fine in these photos coming out, but the photos yesterday, the ones where she’s in slacks, look so fame-hoing. She’s a lawyer there to do a job, not a star on the red carpet, and she was playing up to the cameras like she was a movie star. A big turn-off. These photos in the dress she is much more subdued with the cameras. Someone must have had a talk with her.

      She did look good, though.

      • jane16 says:

        I loved those slacks and the shoes of the same color, a taupey-brown. Also love that she is there to help Greece. I so hope they get the marbles back. It is very important to the people there, and the British have so much of their own culture. (Disclosure: I am half Greek, so undoubtedly prejudiced!)

    • carisel says:

      Grrl,

      Finally, some rational thinking.

      Thank you!

  17. PixieWitch says:

    ugh. changing your last name to your husbands seems so archaic to me.

    • Zimmer says:

      I did it and it makes traveling with my kids much easier. Also, Clooney is easier to say. I can see the logic in both and I respect either way. Some women don’t like their family surnames as well.

      • jane16 says:

        This. I like my ethnic maiden name, but it was too long to deal with on a daily basis, and I like our family all sharing the same last name.

  18. Belle Epoch says:

    If you’re curious, check out this ad for George and Rande’s tequila. I guess they are poking fun at the gay rumors? Is this really the best way to sell tequila?

    http://www.thewrap.com/media/column-post/george-clooney-beds-cindy-crawfords-husband-and-its-all-because-tequila-video-72426/

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      I just don’t get him. If he’s supposed to be going for some serious office somewhere, he seems to be doing some odd things. The commercial won’t help his supposed going for a more serious image.

      • Jayna says:

        I’ve never believed that George wanted to run for office. He has always said he didn’t, and it would be too confining, too scheduled. George will more than likely want to move more high profile with humanitarian causes and sees his new marriage with Amal as becoming a power couple in that way, movers and shakers. I see that as his strategy, but not stuck in an office in California week in and week out running a state. Nope, don’t see it. He loves producing movies and traveling the world and hanging out in his estate in Italy.

      • FingerBinger says:

        I don’t see Clooney running for office either. Aside from all the skeletons in his closet he would have to declare his income. I don’t think George wants people knowing how much money he has. This might not seem like a big deal ,but I think this could be an issue.

      • Jessica says:

        I completely agree Jayna. Maybe if directing and producing had been a bust he would have gone that way, but no way is he giving his work up now.

        If it was something he had ever thought seriously about he would have started laying the groundwork a long time ago. He’s 54 years old (and an old 54 due to his back problems), and as of right now he hasn’t done anything you’d expect him to do if he had some big political career in mind.

  19. Someonestolemyname says:

    Judging by the comments in the Daily Mail article, this legal attempt at trying to move the Elgin Marbles from the British Museum is certainly not earning her or George any British goodwill.
    The comments are mostly awful for her and George since the newspaper has taken off the moderation.

    I don’t get the attractiveness the press talks about, this woman is terribly thin.
    She must look scary skinny in person.

    • SunnyD says:

      Please don’t think the Daily Mail is representative of British people. It is known by many people over here as the Daily Hate.

      • Somenestolemyname says:

        1000+ comments mostly negative.

      • SunnyD says:

        Comments on the Daily Mail website are still not a barometer of “British goodwill”. In my experience sensible or educated Brits see the Daily Mail as a glorified comic, albeit one that is narrow-minded, fearful of change, anti-progressive causes, puritanical but happy to show pictures of young women “flaunting” their curves etc. “Daily Mail reader” is used as a shorthand in the way “soccer mom” is.

      • Somenestolemyname says:

        But there are comments in all of the newspapers and magazines about her and most negative.

        George can hype her and make her famous with his PR machine, but he can’t make public warm to her, if some of them haven’t.

  20. Hissyfit says:

    So let me get this straight, their pr team leaked this info about her next case so their fans could camp out and wait for the arrival of Italy’s stunt queen?

    • FingerBinger says:

      FWIW her firm has had this case since 2011. Long before she met George Clooney.

      • noway says:

        Yes but her involvement is relatively recent. I believe the Greek government which has a lot of financial issues and at one point couldn’t pay for the lawyer to fight this case is looking for publicity for their cause. Voila Amal Clooney to the rescue.

    • Jessica says:

      It’s not recent, she was working on it in 2011 as well. It’s just that no one was paying attention to which cases she was on back then.

      • noway says:

        According to what I understand from others in the field, in 2011 Gordon Robertson QC- Head of Doughty Chambers came to consult- she is part of his team, but wasn’t at that time involved although there are now some media sources saying she was. Greece did not hire them as they did not have the money to pay. Now even the head of the British Unification of the Parthenon Marbles stated we welcome celebrities, meaning Amal, involved in this case as it brings the case to the forefront of public attention. They were brought back to gain more international public favor for their case, because I still seriously doubt that Greece has the money to pay for any long period of time, as their economy is still in the tank. I am not trying to discredit her or Greece, but this is partially a PR ploy, and her involvement to an extent is because of her notoriety.

  21. laughing girl says:

    God, she really loves the attention, doesn’t she. She’s positively preening. Side-note: George does like them thin. Very thin.

    • Someonestolemyname says:

      Yup, She’s a bit of a FameWhora.

      • blondie says:

        And she’s blind item 2 in cdan today..can you say uber diva?

      • Somenestolemyname says:

        There’s well over 1000 comments, most of them negative, against her, that says a lot about how the people who are reading the article about her feel.

        It’s funny because when DM comments were moderated during the engagement&wedding they were almost all positive,mount now that moderation is off of articles about her and Georrge now they are mostly negative.

      • jane16 says:

        @ blondie: blind items rehash says that cdan blind (#2 today) is about Hillaria Baldwin. They have a pretty good success rate at picking the blinds, according to my husbands two assistants, who live for this stuff.

      • noway says:

        First I think the blinds are mostly fake or exaggerated, but that blind is definitely meant for Amal. First the Baldwins were married in 2012. They were together before that and people knew about her for well over a year. Which was in the clue. Also, the Clooneys were just married rather publicly or did you miss that? She seems to be enjoying and doing well with the attention, certainly not cowering or hiding, not saying she should, but they are definitely going for Amal in this. Kind of obvious.

  22. Observer says:

    “George does like them thin. Very thin.”

    So does Brad Pitt.
    Just an observation.

    • Alexis says:

      Or, are they both so prominent that their significant others see fit to drop weight in order to avoid tabloid abuse? If Amal hadn’t dropped all that weight the tabs wouldn’t be calling her “classic and classy” they’d be calling her fat, even though she never was close to fat. I do notice that both men’s partners tend to drop weight after starting to date them, but if they were really that weight obsessed, they could have easily found women who were ultra thin to begin with.

      • Somenestolemyname says:

        The same tabs will be calling her Anorexic in no time.

      • CC says:

        Ehhh….nothing new, whatever body shape, there will always be someone hating on a woman’s appearance, whichever it is. Or trying to objectify it.

  23. Josefa says:

    I don’t think I see the big deal here? It’s just her name. No one is being affected in the slightest by this choice. I don’t see “the bad message sent to young girls” or the “lack of self esteem” this implies.

    I know a celeb gossip forum is the last place one is allowed to say this, but this whole news just striked me as very… irrelevant. What caught my attention was the fact it had so many comments.

    • whatsmyname? says:

      I agree, it’s a name and she has the right to decide what the hell she wants to do. There is no right or wrong.

  24. Peppa says:

    In regards to the name thing: I got married at 24, which these days is considered super young to get married. At the time, I did not want to change my name. If anything, I wanted to hyphen it, but my husband and his family pressured me (he said it hurt his feelings I didn’t want to have his name- my husband is a nice guy and not a jerk, he just came from a very different background than I did) and I caved. His family are the kind of people who will side eye a woman keeping her maiden name, a woman never getting married, or people who say they don’t want kids. My husband is the 10th of his name. If we were to have a son, I didn’t want to name it after him and my in laws had a fit. My father in law said it’s what was done in this family (apparently his mother sat down and had a talk with my mother in law because she didn’t want her son to have the same name, either). The funny thing is, even though I am legally and professionally known by my married name, friends and family refer to me by my maiden name all the time because they say it fits my personality better. Family and societal pressure are big factors for some women, but I doubt that is the case for Amal. I don’t dislike her as some do, but I’m sure she is milking being married to an A-list movie star for all it’s worth.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      I’m surprised that it was such a big deal too. Whatever our personal thoughts about them marrying (me, I am just totally confused over wtf she sees in Clooney, and think their entire wedding roll out was freaking annoying because it felt like it was FOREVER), maybe he wanted her to take his name. Maybe she wanted to take her husband’s name, whenever she got married. I think her old name was a lot better, because it was so pretty, but whatevs. I’m just interested in how much judgement is going on over a woman taking her husband’s name. If we’re going to talk about patriarchal influences, et al, then none of these women who are saying that it’s sexist and backwards for taking a man’s name when you get married should get married—if that’s how far they feel about it.

      The only reason my mom didn’t take my dad’s name when they got married was because she had three older kids with her last name, and two younger ones with our dad’s name, and she didn’t want me and my twin/older sister to be the only ones in the house with that last name. I can’t say that I wouldn’t ever change my last name if I get married–simply because I like the flow and the way my name sounds.

  25. Miss Jupitero says:

    Personally, I think her look is way overdone and over-maintained, and I think it ages her. Many of her photos look as though she is beefing up her hair with extensions, or at the very least too much careful blowing out and over-styling. Too much makeup, too much product, too much “work” done. Meh.

  26. siri says:

    So instead of human rights it’s gonna be marbles for Greece? Wow! Her boss just took her for the ride because he knows it’s gonna be free publicity. There are tons of pics of her arriving in Greece, and she loves every minute of it. But George couldn’t even get the name of the marbles right: he called them Pantheon marbles at a press conference about Monuments Men. It’s Parthenon, George! I can’t take these people serious anymore.

  27. Nimbolicious says:

    I’m married, y’all! To George Clooney, y’all! Changed my name so y’all don’t forget, now! Doin’ impo’tant shiz in Greece now, y’all! Look at me! Look at me!

    • boredblond says:

      Good call nim. Reading these name change comments has me in stitches. She changed her name to justify the spotlight..you can’t believe for one minute if she married Joe nobody she’d do the same. If you asked 100 people on the street in the US her name, I bet no one would know. If not for reading this, I wouldn’t. She wants the fame name, end of silly story.

    • Somenestolemyname says:

      The Blind Item on CDN is telling,if true.
      It’s only going to get worse.

    • hmmm says:

      Perfect description and interpretation. Kudos.

  28. Jaded says:

    They remind me of a comment Katherine Hepburn once made about Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers…”she gave him sex appeal and he gave her class” only with them it’s the opposite. She gives him class and he gives her sex appeal.

  29. Sarah says:

    Just made the mistake of reading the comments on an us weekly article about her. Wow. Just wow.

  30. no logo says:

    She’s educated, beautiful, classy, very elegant….everything smug Angelina is not. She should be proud of herself and enjoy all the attention; she’s bringing it to a worthy cause. After all she’s a new, fresh face out there in the spotlight, a well rounded-woman, I like her.

  31. magpie says:

    They probably read this site and hate Alamooney and decided to nip that in the bud 🙂

  32. weegiewarrior says:

    Shes had a stunning makeover for sure and looks classy but u woudnt expect anthing less from george clooneys missus – but the elgin marbles? Really – Is that it? With all th dreadful things happening in the world just now this is what theyr concerned with? How utterly humanitarian of them; starving refugees in iraq and syria and ebola victims in africa must be thrilled.

    • Jessica says:

      She’s not an aid worker, she’s a lawyer who takes on human rights cases among other things.

      • ickythump says:

        No, she’s not an aid worker but I’ve seen PR suggesting that the Clooney’s are humanitarians ready to save the world – NOT. And human rights lawyers in the UK seem to spend all their time trying to keep criminals and terrorists from being deported to stand trial.

  33. Miss M says:

    I dont see the big deal about it. She got married and decided to change her.

  34. Deb says:

    I will avoid all controversy and just say that I think Amal looks very pretty in that top picture. 🙂

  35. Chris says:

    So now it’s Alaclooney?

  36. Lulu says:

    I’ve never seen a photo of this woman looking anything but smug.

  37. Vava says:

    The comments here are pretty amazing to me. Why does anyone even care what she calls herself? She’s married. If she wants to change her name, that’s fine. If not, that’s fine too. I’ll be a lone wolf out there saying I hope they have a happy life together. End of story.

    • Janet says:

      Amen and ^5. The sniping is ridiculous. And I say that as a long-time Jolie-Pitt fan. These two ladies have nothing to do with each other.

  38. Kristen says:

    Feminism is all about choices, so no shade to Kate Middleton. But to me, Amal is way more aspirational.

  39. Peachy says:

    Clooney is clearly pulling all the stops and Oscar baiting hard this year! Best Cinematography, Costume Design, and Makeup/Hairstyling categories are all clearly targeted with this showstopper.

    Luscious scenery, magnificent wardrobe, glorious cameos, and solid performances were given overall. And yet, like the final season of The Facts of Life, it has dragged on too long and Amal ready bored.

  40. Loganski says:

    I don’t know why it has to be an ill-fated attempt to get the Elgin Marbles back. I’ve seen them in the British Museum and always felt that they were pilfered from Greece and they should be returned. End of.

    • Flower says:

      I think the problem is that it would open a very messy can of worms regarding repatriation of other items. That’s why the EU has never become involved in the dispute despite both countries being members. France would have to give back the Rosetta stone, Germany Nefertiri’s bust, Venice St Mark horses which were looted from Constantinople to name just the very pointy tip of the iceberg. Leaving aside the right or wrong of it , no one has the guts to start the ball rolling because of the literally millions of treasures looted and stolen which now live in museums world wide not to mention in other public and private collections. The three Cleopatra’s needles removed from Luxor which can now be seen in London, Paris and Washington would have to be sent home. The list is endless.

  41. Loganski says:

    Also, this has nothing to do with Amal Alamuddin and all the hype regarding the marriage, etc. It’s about doing the right thing and restoring a part of history to the rightful owners.

  42. Flower says:

    Interestingly George was not alone at comic con he had his BFF hairdresser Waldo Sanchez with him, considering several blinds lately about he and Amal having an agreement over a ‘close’ male friend ….make of that what you will. Was Waldo at the wedding, I don’t recall seeing any pictures of him?

  43. Somenestolemyname says:

    ROBERT HARDMAN: “If only the Clooneys would stick to posing for Hello! and stop kicking Britian”

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2793354/robert-hardman-clooneys-stick-posing-hello-stop-kicking-britain-elgin-marbles.html#ixzz3GDCIhNPs

    Ouch!

  44. desultorynomad says:

    Here’s what I really don’t get, all personal preferences aside:
    What do you do in the event of a divorce? Change your name back? Keep the ex-husband’s name?
    What do you do if your husband dies? Change your name back? Keep the dead husband’s name?
    And if/when you remarry, what then?

    • noway says:

      All depends, and really any of the above. Most people seem to change the name back with divorce, unless they have kids and/or were married for a long period of time. Death people usually keep the name.

      If you remarry again it is changing a lot. It used to be that people just change to the new husbands name, but now there is a lot of hypens. like Jolie-Pitt. I like that it is open for women now, and whatever they want to do they do. I really don’t see the big deal in her name change at all to each his own.

  45. Sammy says:

    If I married George Clooney I would change my name to Clooney. I think it’s weird when members of a family all have different last names. Call me traditional or old fashioned. Amal married George, they’re in love – why wouldn’t she take his name? Gheesh