Kristen Bell: Being a mother is an ‘absolutely unmissable’ part of life

Kristen Bell

Kristen Bell covers the May issue of Good Housekeeping to promote her role in House of Lies. She barely talks about the show other than to say she’s not stressing about her career. Motherhood is her main priority. Kristen gave birth to her second daughter, Delta, last December. So there’s the obligatory discussion of baby weight, which I omitted because Kristen’s doing the “I’m not worried about it, I burn off calories running after my kids” shtick. I think she is more focused on weight than she reveals, mostly because she talks about having exactly 17 pounds left to lose.

The interview is very long, so I’ve grabbed some bits and pieces with the full piece available here (including lots of stuff on her pro-vax stance). She talks about her childbirth process and raves about how epidurals make you feel great again. She admits to naming her second baby Delta because it sounds, “badass” (sorry, Designing Women fans). What I find most interesting are the parts about couple’s therapy and how she considers motherhood to be an “unmissable” experience in life:

On regular couples therapy: “I thought I had this life thing down pat when I met Dax. I didn’t realize that I needed a much bigger toolbox to have confrontations and disagreements with people. You do better in the gym with a trainer; you don’t figure out how to cook without reading a recipe. Therapy is not something to be embarrassed about. … I don’t mind advertising a healthy marriage. I’m trying, just like everyone else.”

She loves being a mom: “I wasn’t positive I wanted kids. But I can now confirm having them is absolutely unmissable. Before we had the girls, I asked a few people in my life who are annoyingly blunt and honest on every level if we should, knowing that if it wasn’t worth it, they’d have the balls to say, ‘Listen, don’t. Live your life.’ But across the board, everyone said it was unmissable. When Lincoln came out, at first I was like, ‘Eh, what do I do with it? I can take it home?’ But when I started breastfeeding, the oxytocin or my hormones or hundreds of thousands of years of evolution kicked in. I didn’t want to let her go. Having kids feels like that first seventh-grade crush that overwhelms every molecule in your body, but it’s permanent.”

Motherhood is karma: “I never understood my mom until I had kids. When she would look at me like I was the first drop of water she’d seen at the end of a desert trip and go, “You will never understand how much I love you,” I would go, “God, get away! Enough!” Even in my 20s, I just thought, “You’re so dramatic and overly sentimental.” Now I look at my kids that way and think, “Wow, this is a cycle.” Lincoln won’t understand it until she decides to have kids … that’s just the way it’s supposed to be. Motherhood right-sized everything for me. I’m happier, and I was pretty happy before.”

[From Good Housekeeping]

Dax also pops into the interview when the counseling subject comes up. He’s totally into regular couples therapy and doesn’t see why there’s such a stigma. I think there’s nothing wrong with therapy, but it often doesn’t work because lots of married couples try it as a last ditch effort. Sort of like trying to repair a car that hasn’t had an oil change in 15 years.

Kristen talks about many other things, including baby sign language classes (which CB covered already). She also discusses how heartbroken she was to have a second C-section with baby Delta. Kristen didn’t have a 70-hour labor like Jill Duggar, but she labored for over 24 hours when doctors told her it was finally time. Kristen says she fretted over Delta and Lincoln feeling unbonded because mommy couldn’t lift them for six weeks. I understand that concern, but it sounds like Kristen has more than made up for that brief period.

Kristen Bell

Kristen Bell

Photos courtesy of Good Housekeeping & WENN

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

216 Responses to “Kristen Bell: Being a mother is an ‘absolutely unmissable’ part of life”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. dr mantis toboggan says:

    I’d be in therapy too if I married dax Shepard

  2. jc126 says:

    I think the only really annoying, insulting statement is the “you’ll never understand the love you feel until you become a parent”. I think LOTS of people who wanted to be parents but weren’t/haven’t been able to do so for whatever reason understand perfectly the love one would feel for a much-wanted child.
    I wish people would stop saying this. Especially people who simultaneously say “I wasn’t even sure I wanted kids until I gave birth”. Stop projecting.

    • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

      Yea–or don’t have kids because they don’t want them, and love their family and friends just as much as anyone else. I can see it being a DIFFERENT kind of love/feeling, because you’ve literally created someone, and that IS awesome…..but it’s just different. Not better. Different.

      • aims says:

        Absolutely. It’s a different kind of love. I find that people who are truly happy don’t shout it out whenever there’s a chance. People who are content in their lives are happy living it. It shows.

      • Ash says:

        “People who are content in their lives are happy living it. It shows.”

        Exactly. Only those who are incredibly insecure obsessively concern themselves with others lives’ and others’ choices for their lives.

      • springingforward says:

        She is sharing her personal experience in an interview; it is her opinion and there will be those who can empathize and those who don’t. I happen to agree with her regarding the overwhelming love for my children.
        People need to be thicker skinned.

    • Hayley990 says:

      @jc126, thank you. i am child-free by choice and i can’t stand it when it’s insinuated that i’m missing something…i really don’t think i am. i love my life so much as is!

      • Imo says:

        Technically you are missing something but as VC aptly described it, that something is not better or worse than the choices you’ve made for your own life. Motherhood is different and the love you have for your children is different. But the problem is when people believe that it is a supreme or sublime love that the rest of us should be pitied for not achieving/pursueing. It is stupid and short-sighted.

      • katy says:

        Agree. I remember a client of mine, who was a married and child-free woman, and she told me one day that not having children was the best decision of her life – she can go where she wants, when she wants, no matter what happens and she wouldn’t give up that freedom for anything in the world. I feel the same way as she did, and also, I feel extremely smothered if my cats want more than 5 minutes of attention. I mentally and emotionally couldn’t handle children.

        Also, saying that is kind of crappy for the couples who DO want children and can’t have any (of course, there is always adoption!)

      • Mary says:

        Also child free here. And yes, agree with you that every person should be happy to make their own decision about their lives. And technically don’t we all miss out on something else every time we make a decision? So in the end we just have to choose what we do want to experience, and be happy with our choices!

      • Ash says:

        “And technically don’t we all miss out on something else every time we make a decision?”

        Many seem to forget this in that when you make a choice, you’re discarding the other choices. That’s part of life. You can’t have everything you want all at the same time.

        “So in the end we just have to choose what we do want to experience, and be happy with our choices! ”

        Co-sign.

    • PoppyAdair says:

      AMEN! I will never have kids thanks to cancer, and these kinds of statements REALLY piss me off! Personally I think I have at least a similar understanding of love as all these mothers because I realized a few years ago that as a single woman I could NEVER adopt a child with my precarious health. I simply could not live with myself knowing that I might die too soon and leave my child without a parent. So I abandoned my dreams of being a mother, and apparently that makes me a defective, worthless person who cannot possibly understand love.

      Frankly, I have forgotten more about genuine, selfless love from my dogs than most humans will ever learn.

      • Jayna says:

        You should tweet this to her and tell her to think before she speaks.

      • Imo says:

        Amen and may your health always improve. At the risk of being presumptious may I suggest you consider fostering? Those wonderful children are already here and every person who fosters can potentially provide a warm, loving haven for a child going through unimagineable hardship. They may stay a few weeks or a few years so you must be prepared for either scenario but the time they do spend with you is rewarding a hundred fold. If your health is fair to moderate it is entirely possible to be a great foster mom. Older children, especially, need placement and often work out even better than high needs smaller children.
        You sound like a gentle, thoughtful person and I bet you and your four legged kids would provide an awesome home for a child. Hope I’m not out of line here.
        Best of luck 🙂

      • Asiyah says:

        Poppy girl I love you. I’m sorry you went through so much but I’m happy you’re here, happy and healthy and that you were strong enough to survive cancer AND make such a decision with respect to adopting.

    • lucy2 says:

      Agreed. Maybe you can’t experience PARENTAL love unless you become a parent, but there are lots of other kind of love in the world. And sadly there are a lot of parents who don’t love their kids, and vice versa. She seems really happy becoming a mom and that’s awesome, but it’s not for everyone.

      I do like what she says about couples counseling though, that makes a lot of sense and I think it’s good to chip away at the stigma.

      • Ash says:

        “Maybe you can’t experience PARENTAL love unless you become a parent, but there are lots of other kind of love in the world.”

        You’re right. There are many kinds of love.

        “And sadly there are a lot of parents who don’t love their kids, and vice versa.”

        Unfortunately, this is true.

    • Kitten says:

      +1,000,000

    • Veronica says:

      Aye, there’s a lot of privilege in that statement. Not every woman can have children, and plenty of women in America can’t afford to adopt, either. And, frankly, there are plenty of women who should never be mothers, either.

    • AuroraO says:

      Exactly. The things I have to hear almost daily from people who tell me my life isn’t complete without children- it’s exhausting. I don’t hear anyone telling this BS to men without children.

      • Jonathan says:

        @Aurorao – I actually get it all the time, from family (especially my Grandmother or my Mother, usually said with a tilted head and sad, sad eyes) friends and coworkers (all said with a good dose of pity).

        My Mum is particularly disappointed I didn’t give her grandchildren- despite that my brother has given her 3 granddaughters and she’s also great grandmother to THEIR kids. Apparently I would have made the “best father ever” and my kids “would have been different”.

    • Wilma says:

      Yes, I totally shocked a friend who came to visit me last week when I told her -with my baby of 8 weeks sleeping in my arms- that I would have been very happy without her too. Now that she’s here and everything I can’t imagine being without her again, but if it hadn’t happened I still would have had an awesome life, just a very different life.

      • Wannabeparisian says:

        Right there with you, I have a 6 month old and have been back at work part time, everyone says don’t you miss him? Aren’t you obsessed? Well no. I love him unconditionally but if I didn’t have him I’d be fine too. New moms need to just calm down a minute and stop perpetuating this whole ‘I’m obsessed with my bsby’ thing. It’s a very western mentality and if you don’t feel that way, which is out of one’s control, you think something is wrong with you. I certainly question myself when I read this stuff and say to myself ‘how come I’m not that way?’ Did I miss something??

    • Birdix says:

      I have children and love, love, love them like that. And have also experienced that in other parts of my life. It’s not just parenthood, everyone can understand that kind of love. There are strong hormones involved that makes everything heightened to a new parent– similar to when you first fall in love and can’t eat, sleep, etc. Those lingering hormones, the bond they’ve created and/or some kind of Pavlovian response are quite helpful when the ultimate love of your life becomes a tween and is far less cuddly and sweet (unless they want to use your computer or need a ride to the beach).

      • Kiddo says:

        Excellent point, I was about to post it elsewhere. She discounts the capacity, for anyone who isn’t a biological mother, to experience the same intensity of love. And that is false. It negates or discounts the level of love people experience when adopting children or pets, and it completely ignores the fact that some bio parents are devoid or lacking in the capacity, even though they had children. I think that is what sets people off as far as these narratives go. It’s not that they aren’t happy for other people’s choices, but that the person who spews this is judging anyone else’s inherent ability to attain the same level of emotion, and in doing so, makes it sound like others are ‘lesser than’, unless they join the club.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Yeah, y’all KNOW that rubbed me the wrong way. Look, I get it, it must feel amazing and like you’re the first person to ever experience it. But to say it’s “unmissable?” Not so sensitive to those of us who tried but missed it. I’m happy for her and for all grateful mothers, but I’m still a whole person, and I know what love is. Thank you very much.

      • Honeybee Blues says:

        The moment I read “unmissable” I thought of you, GNAT. It appears that Hollywood’s new mothers are a bit tone deaf.

      • AcidRock says:

        I was having a hard time believing you all were serious with this until I got here. In what way, shape, or form did Kristen claim to be speaking ON BEHALF OF ALL WOMEN? She’s speaking directly about her *own* experience, her *own* daughters, her *own* life as a mother and how SHE feels this is something she loves more than anything. How people are twisting this into some anti-childless-woman rant is mind-boggling. Since when does someone’s words about her own life morph into a proclamation about what’s right for all of (wo)mankind? Did she actually say “You’re a lesser woman if you don’t give birth”? She’s not insinuating, she’s not insulting, she’s not dismissing, SHE IS ONLY SPEAKING ABOUT HER OWN EXPERIENCE. My goodness, I honestly can’t believe what I’m reading here.

      • Darksparkle says:

        +1 as usual.

      • Sue says:

        @AcidRock – well she can’t really (or shouldn’t) speak for her daughter either, but, she is. SHE felt like “God get away” when her mom was “overly sentimental”. Her daughter may, may not as a teen. And her daughter may or may not understand her mom’s love when/if she ever becomes a mom herself.

        Just saying. It’s projection. As such it lacks insight and to some extent, truth.
        People are different.

        Regardless, it’s wonderful she loves her children so much.

    • noway says:

      I always hate these remarks, aside from insinuating people who may not be able to have children should feel less than whole, these comments are uniformly not true for everyone. You know why, people are different. Some people have kids and don’t get the love. Some understood their parent’s love as a child and others not. Plus all you have to do is reword it and say in my experience it is unmissable and I understood my mother’s love better to not be so obnoxious. As a mom, I can tell you there are some women and men that really shouldn’t be parents. It should be a choice that will take up a lot of someone’s life. No one should feel any pressure to become a parent if they don’t want to.

      • Timbuktu says:

        While I’m in total agreement with everyone in this thread, I can’t help to wonder: why do we pay attention to these people at all? I mean, I know a TON of real women who say this kind of stuff in real life, and most of the time, they don’t get called on it. People either agree, or are two polite, or, if it’s a painful issue for them, just don’t want to talk about it because they’re afraid to come undone if they do.
        I feel like this is very much along the same lines, and yes, she’s a celebrity, so her statements resonate more, but… she is JUST a celebrity! Most celebrities are neither educated nor particularly smart. Mix that with ridiculous amounts of money, and you get a LOT of entitlement issues and ignorance. It just seems that it’s something we should EXPECT of them, so I’m surprised when people are surprised by it. 🙂
        I’m also not sure what we can do it about it, really: I feel like when a questionable celebrity statement makes waves, the backlash is almost too much, it’s like the whole school suddenly realized that 1 student is a bully and ganged up on him.
        I feel like the best solution is to just stop putting celebrities on a pedestal by default? But I guess that’s just not going to happen any time soon?

      • Kiddo says:

        I think expressing an opinion here is the way that some of those other people get called on it. If only one person in the world condescended like this, to those who chose not to give birth, I don’t think it would strike a nerve, But since it is a persistent cultural drumbeat in the real world, especially with politics becoming involved with people’s wombs, it does speak to a larger issue than dopey celebs.

      • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

        Timbuktu, I guess I’m lucky. I grew up with a generation of women who’d had their kids on their own (for at least part of their lives), so we were always told to have kids if we wanted them, and if we could take care of them by ourselves i.e. don’t have kids that you can’t take care of, financially, in case something happens.

      • Timbuktu says:

        VirgiliaCoriolanus,
        I’m not sure I fully grasp your counter point.
        My friends come from all kinds of backgrounds: single Moms, Moms many times divorced, parents still married, but I consider all of my good friends to be very responsible parents who take care of their kids, even those who had “oops babies”.
        The main point, though, is that we all have children, and we all wanted children. The ones with “oops babies” may have preferred to have children later, but they still wanted them. I just don’t happen to have anyone in my circle who just doesn’t want children at all. Some don’t want any now, but they still want them at some point.
        I think it’s sort of natural for a group of Moms, though, I don’t think it’s because we discriminate against child-free, it’s just that as Moms, we have similar schedules and commitments, and it is easier for us to be in a satisfying friendship with each other than with people who live a radically different lifestyle (single people are another example, I have some lovely single friends who do all kinds of amazing things, but I can rarely join them and that automatically precludes me from being really “in their circle” and by the same token, precludes them from being in mine).

    • Odessa says:

      I agree! I just had a baby, and it’s really, really hard. Yes, I love my baby but now more than ever I know It’s not for everyone. People like her put up this facade of perfection and instant bonding and its a cruel wake up call for those of us who struggle. Breastfeeding was an instant bond, eh? Maybe you should tell that to my screaming baby and my bleeding nipples.

      • Timbuktu says:

        Well, to be fair, for me, breastfeeding was an instant bond both times. I know I’m lucky, a ton of friends struggled, but it does happen.

      • Wilma says:

        I know a lot more women who struggled than women who had no problems breastfeeding. And if you look at history (I’m a historian, so I always look at history) this has been the case for a long time. The moment breastfeeding appears in sources, problems with breastfeeding appear too. It is one of the reasons so many infants used to die. There’s a reason a good wetnurse could have a lucrative career back then.

    • Lucinda says:

      I knew as soon as I read the title of this thread I would see a comment like yours. For God’s sake people, calm down. She didn’t say this. She was quoting her mother. And my understanding of my mother’s love changed dramatically once I had a child of my own. Hand to God I would never have gained that understanding if I hadn’t become a mother. Notice I don’t point out HOW I became a mother because I think that is irrelevant. As for people who are unable to birth their own children, I sympathize. I do. But there are a lot of ways to mother. Lots and lots and lots. And if the only way for you to feel like a mother is through birthing your own and you are unable to do so, I feel sorry for you. Truly. But don’t project onto someone who expresses a life changing event that you can’t have. It isn’t their fault either. I’m so tired of people finding offense in someone expressing a general statement about their experience when it doesn’t match your own personal experience.

  3. sally says:

    @bedhead House of Lies not House of Cards. Two different shows.

  4. Regina Phalange (formerly Kara) says:

    You guys, I’m happy, I’m so happy. Did I mention I was happy?

  5. bammer says:

    So she doesn’t want her children in the spotlight but constantly talks about them. Logical.

    • AcidRock says:

      There’s a difference in mentioning the children that most people who read celeb magazines/blogs know exist, and parading them out in public…yeesh.

  6. InvaderTak says:

    Uhhhhhg. It is missable for a lot of women. It’s unmissable FOR YOU. Stop with the hyperbolic nonsense about evolution and not understanding your mother. Good grief the whole thing was infuriating.

    • Esmom says:

      Yeah, I thought it was over the top. We were discussing yesterday about ScarJo doing pretty well at restraining herself from making “grandiose statements about motherhood” like celeb moms tend to do. Kristen makes ScarJo seem downright laid back.

    • Greyson says:

      The way I see it, a new mom gushing about her experience is speaking *her* truth. It doesn’t have to match others specific experience or feelings on the matter.

      Motherhood changes a person. It’s an experience people who are childfree have not experienced and those who are childless have yet to. As much as childfree folks do not wish to acknowledge this very real phenomenon, it is a profound shift in a person’s sense of self.

      While you may share some percentage of DNA with the cool uncle who never had kids, without your Dad and Mom and grandparents deciding to have kids (indeed following the instincts of reproduction that we as a species evolved with) you wouldn’t be here!

      • Anon33 says:

        This entire comment is insulting. Not everyone experiences what you have described. Yoir feelings are your feelings about your situation and that’s wonderul FOR YOU. Please don’t speak for me or my sense of self.

      • Kitten says:

        This is why I so much appreciate my friends that have kids though. They don’t glorify it, they don’t sugarcoat it, they talk about the positives and are VERY real about how difficult it is.

        I think that’s why so many of us who are child-free roll our eyes at people like Bell–because it’s always the same clichéd PollyAna view of parenthood. Never do they talk about the shit-stained diapers, the sleepless nights, the incessant crying–it’s all unicorns, butterflies, and rainbows.

        I get what you’re saying about the fact that she shouldn’t have to adhere to anyone else’s thoughts on becoming a mother, but the breathless gushing that “motherhood is life-changing and amazing and not to be missed!” just gets old.

      • layla says:

        “..indeed following the instincts of reproduction that we as a species evolved with”

        That’s a pretty grandiose statement. I am child free by choice… .the reason I am child free is because I have never, ever, EVER once had any instinct to procreate, never had an inkling of wanting a child, never ever EVER had any urge for furthering my DNA. If I’m being brutally honest, I don’t even care to hold babies because there is not ONE SINGLE URGE IN ME that gushes and goo-goos when a baby is in the room. I don’t dislike babies or children, I just don’t have a desire, an instinct, a want for my own.

        I am 40 and have met the love of my life, so the usual “you’ll change…” doesn’t and won’t apply here.

        Do I have maternal instincts – absolutely… with my dogs and with caring for my friend’s children etc but that is as far as my DNA and instincts go. How hard is it to acknowledge that perhaps we are all not programed the same?

        I don’t think anyone who is child free denies the fact that motherhood changes a person. It absolutely does. It absolutely HAS TO because, SCIENCE. However, the constant “you’ll never know” “you can’t understand love” “it’s absolutely unmissable” is insulting to those of us who choose not to have children, or can’t have children. We are not lesser people because of it – we are just different, like every single mother is different. Neither are a universal experience.

      • Annika says:

        @Greyson:
        New mom here. I agree with you that motherhood brings permanently life-altering changes. But it isn’t the ONLY experience in life that can affect you deeply & profoundly. It also isn’t the ONLY type of love that can rock you to your core, and *gasp* it might not be the PARAMOUNY type of love you’ll experience in your entire life.
        I think that’s why your post sounds insensitive. It sounds like you’re saying child-free people are missing out in the biggest love experience in life & they just don’t get it.
        I have experienced a new & deep type of love for my son & it’s wonderful. But I’ve also experienced a new level of responsibility & anxiety that has also shook me to my core, & it will never go away. I’m happy I waited until 34 for this, because my younger self would’ve been even more overwhelmed than I feel at this age.

      • Who ARE these people? says:

        People who adopt feel as much love for their “children of the heart” as for “children of DNA.” Same protective instincts, same everything kick in too. Though our species perpetuates itself via that strong urge to reproduce, that’s for the species as a whole, not every single individual within the species for a wide variety of reasons. There may be animal biologists on this board who can vouch for the same phenomenon in non-human species, primate or not.

        Besides, in cases where there are genetic disorders, an adoption can actually improve the chances of a family being carried on into the next generation.

        Also, have found women without children often to be incredibly important in the lives of children and mothers, one way or another. Their contributions should be honored.

      • littlestar says:

        “Motherhood changes a person.”

        Speaking as someone who doesn’t have kids and will very likely never have kids (by choice), I have to disagree with this statement. I know plenty of selfish *ssholes who had kids and are still selfish *ssholes. Or I see friends project their insecurities onto their kids, messing their kids up in the process. I think western society has this idea that “motherhood changes a person”, like it automatically makes you selfless and a saint and full of unconditional love, when in reality, that doesn’t happen for some people. Granted, yes it does change some people, but other people, not so much. They continue on as they did before they had kids.

        And really, shouldn’t it be parenthood? Why do we still perpetuate this myth that motherhood is somehow so much greater than fatherhood?

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        @littlestar
        I completely agree. You either have the capacity to change, grow and take in your life experiences, process them and learn from them, or you don’t. This idea that being a mother automatically makes you anything in particular is just so stupid. Some of the greatest people I know are parents. Some of the biggest assholes I know are parents. It doesn’t change you into a good person if you’re not one already.

      • Timbuktu says:

        @Anon33
        You sure are easily insulted. Greyson hardly even expressed any feelings and opinions, she pretty stated that you need a Mom and a Dad to be born, and that procreation is a biological imperative for a species. You find this insulting? These are basic facts of life. It’s sort of like being insulted by the fact that the sky is blue to a human eye.
        “Not everyone experiences what you have described.” – EXACTLY. That is exactly Greyson’s point. That motherhood IS a unique experience. It’s not the only unique experience. Adoption, getting an Oscar, going to the Moon are also examples of very unique experiences, far more unique than motherhood. But still, half of Earth’ population (men) can never experience motherhood. Should men be insulted, too? I fail to see why, really.

      • claire says:

        I agree with you. It’s her experience. She said it was unmissable FOR HER. Other women get so freaking sensitive over this, when someone is just speaking for themselves. Projection. Projection Everywhere!

      • Timbuktu says:

        Kitten:

        “Never do they talk about the sh*t-stained diapers, the sleepless nights, the incessant crying–it’s all unicorns, butterflies, and rainbows.”

        Maybe it’s because they (celebrities) don’t change diapers and have nannies. 🙂 It is quite possible that they only DO get unicorns and rainbows, at least for the first few years, before the kids begin to get into the kind of trouble that nanny can’t solve.
        Or it’s possible it’s just the psychological distance. Trust me, amongst us Moms, we trade stories about the horrors of parenthood all the time. But if I were at a fancy event, for example, I might not tell some of the same stories. Nor would I mention them to a reporter if it wasn’t for a Mommy magazine, I would just assume that people flipping through my interview over morning coffee or an airplane lunch don’t want to read about my kid’s poop. 🙂 Your friends are your friends, some things they tell you, they wouldn’t repeat to a random stranger, let alone on record.

      • Greyson says:

        Anon33:
        I don’t have kids. I hope to at some point but no, I am not yet a parent. I have seen a close friend become a parent so I see the point Kristin is making as talking about *her* experience becoming a parent and how many new parents feel that way! I find it insulting that you assume anyone seeing Kristin’s point of view has to be a parent themselves!


        layla33:
        “That’s a pretty grandiose statement. I am child free by choice… .the reason I am child free is because I have never, ever, EVER once had any instinct to procreate”

        Our species evolved with the drive to reproduce. It’s SCIENCE. Just because you as an individual do not feel the inkling to do so, does not invalidate it. In fact, a person without the drive to reproduce not passing on their genes brings their lineage line to a genetic end, but not necessarily that person’s family as siblings and cousins may pass their genes onto the next generation.

        Our species as a whole will continue on because the majority DO have the drive to reproduce.

        Annika:
        “I think that’s why your post sounds insensitive. It sounds like you’re saying child-free people are missing out in the biggest love experience in life & they just don’t get it.”

        That wasn’t my intent. I stand by motherhood is a unique experience that those of us who haven’t gone through it do not understand in the same way as those who have.

        It’s not the only deep love. I know what it’s like to be a daughter, an aunt, and a sister. I love my family fiercely and always. I would sacrifice myself for them in a heartbeat.

      • Lucinda says:

        Motherhood DOES change you. Sometimes for better. Sometimes for worse. Other things change you too. Losing a parent. Battling cancer. Getting divorced. They all change you. I don’t know what it’s like to have cancer but I won’t roll my eyes at someone talking about how it changed them. Why should child-free children roll their eyes at someone talking about how children changed them in a way child-free people will never know.

        She clearly loves being a mom. Why is that a problem for you???? I LOVE being a mom. I know not everyone does. I know not everyone wants to be a mom. But don’t you dare tell me I can’t gush about how much I love being a mom.

        People PLEASE quit assuming her comments reflect upon your choices somehow because they just don’t.

    • perplexed says:

      I feel she was talking about herself and her own feelings rather than speaking for other people because she kept saying “I” particularly in the statement before she stated how unmissable the experience is, but I can also see how her statement might get on other people’s nerves, sort of like those people who post pictures of their kids constantly, including the sonograms, on Facebook and expect me to care about their private life. To be fair to her, I guess she was asked what her opinion is…

    • Hannah says:

      I think a lot of people make general statements not necessarily trying to apply it to everyone. Do you really think she would say that to someone who couldn’t have kids for example? Or even someone who just didn’t want them, obviously they’ve heard this all before and still don’t want them so clearly they’re happy with their choice. I think we’re so self obsessed as a society that everything everyone says we think they’re talking about us and just…no. Or we just look for little reasons to get offended because we have nothing better to do. I don’t see how this interview should bother anyone who is happy with their choices. It’s not like she went and said you’re worthless and there’s no way you’re happy if you don’t have kids.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Not to pick nits, but she did say it was an unmissable part of life, which I take to mean you haven’t led a complete life if you missed it. And I missed it. So I felt that was a little insensitive.

      • Kitten says:

        +1, GNAT.

    • AcidRock says:

      DID SHE ACTUALLY SAY IT’S UNMISSABLE FOR ALL WOMEN, THOUGH? My goodness, reading comprehension is important here. I am at a loss for words at how people are overreacting to this…

      • GingerCrunch says:

        I was gonna try and fit that in somewhere, but I think I’ll just be cowardly and give your comment a “+1 ” (and scurry away quick like a bunny!).

      • Kitten says:

        Actually, you seem to be the most outraged person here. Everyone else is just thoughtfully expressing their opinion about what she said. She has no obligation to dprAk about motherhood, but if she puts it out there-um yeah, people might have an opinion about it.

      • InvaderTak says:

        “I wasn’t positive I wanted kids. But I can now confirm having them is absolutely unmissable.” Yeah, sounds to me like that’s exactly what she did. Who is she “confirming” this information to, if not a general audience? And yes, that’s an annoying, presumptuous, and potentially upsetting thing to say.

      • Lucinda says:

        It’s all in how you read it. I read it as unmissable for HER. Maybe she even said “for me” and it was cut. We just don’t know and even if she didn’t, it’s a safe assumption to make. Unless you want to be offended. Then more power to you I guess.

  7. Kiddo says:

    She’s wearing Nana’s couch. lol

    • Esmom says:

      That might be the busiest magazine cover I have ever seen. I mean, wtf? Is she the focus or the table? Or the flowers taped to the wall? The art director clearly missed his/her lessons on minimalism.

      • Kiddo says:

        I think there was an explosion at the florist distribution warehouse. Why not?
        Hyperbolic flowery interviews deserve the same on the cover….I guess? And that dress really does resemble the couch. It looks like heavy upholstery fabric, not a breezy cotton sundress. The girl does like structure.

    • Kitten says:

      No way. That’s actually my mom’s Easter tablecloth that went missing a year ago.

      • Kiddo says:

        I think your mom and Nana might be secretly smoking the good stuff behind our backs, thinking “ooh, look how pretty”.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Her facial expression suggests that she knows she looks like an asshole, too.

  8. SnowGlow says:

    Shut up Kristen. Some women, like myself, just don’t want kids. I have known my whole life that I didn’t want kids. I’m so tired of having to pretend like I want kids, every time somebody asks me when I’m having kids (I just turned 29) I have to tell them I hate kids and I don’t want them. Every time, without hesitation, they tell me that will change when you meet somebody you love and they’ll change your mind or my personal favorite, what are you going to do when you get old? Do you want to be alone the rest of your life? Like, WTF? I have never been more sure in my life that children just aren’t for me. Why would I have something I clearly DONT want?

    • Kitten says:

      Preach!

      • Isa says:

        I’m sorry you have to experience that. I fully support childfree people. You know what’s best for you and you shouldn’t have children just because society dictates it.
        Also, we are putting too much strain on planet earth as it is.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      I think it’s much more mature, unselfish, brave and self-aware to say not my thing, don’t want kids than it is to have kids you don’t really want because you’re “supposed” to. So just hang in there.

      • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

        Yes. I’d rather have no kids, than to have those kids grow up and realize that they were better off without parents. Which is what happened with my mom. I guess it’s because times were different, people were expected to get married and have kids, but it’s a hard thing to look at a grandparent (who loves you, etc), and realize that they were a horribly shitty parent to your mother. My mom’s mom never did anything remotely motherly towards my mom. It was like my mom + her siblings were the neighbors kids. It was my oldest aunt who was more like a mother to my mom–she was the one who held her, hugged her, asked if what was wrong, etc…..

        And I can see how it’s so hard for my mom even today–she stayed with her mom for her cancer treatments for months. Cooking, cleaning, paying for stuff, etc. And they were watching the news, and some woman was on there for abandoning her kids–and my grandma said that that’s wrong, she’s a horrible person, she’d NEVER do that. Except she did. For two years. Just took off, and no one knew where she was, and then she came back like nothing had happened. And that hurts my mom–she’s never really had TWO parents that cared about her, I don’t think. And it certainly makes my relationship with her THAT more special, especially now that I’m older, and we are FRIENDS, not just mother/daughter.

        I think you would’ve been a wonderful mother, GNAT 🙂 But that doesn’t make you any less of a person. I really want to adopt kids. I really love kids (in my own way, I don’t gush over baby clothes, etc for example, and am quite strict with my little cousins), but at the same time, if I NEVER did adopt or have any bio kids, the only thing I would be upset about is that I didn’t do it because there are so many kids that are being given up on by people NOT because I didn’t do what society says I should do (and lol, and even in that score, I always planned on being a single mother, not waiting for a relationship)….

      • Imo says:

        VC
        Your post made me tear up. I adored and was adored by my grandmother but she and my mother had a terribly strained relationship. Even as a child I was always torn between the two of them and now I keep my memories of my grandmother to myself.i certainly can’t go on about how incredible I knew her to be when she was a terrible parent to my mother, whom I worship.
        Thanks for sharing this.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Thank you, VC. I would have loved the experience, but I also learned a lot from being denied. There’s nothing for it but to just be thankful for all I do have and let go of what will never be. It’s a process. (Obviously)

        That’s sad about your mother. It must be hard to care for someone who abandoned you and hear her re-write history and have to bite your tongue. And my heart aches for any child who doesn’t feel loved.

        Now YOU will just be a wonderful mother to someone lucky enough to be adopted by you. I hope that dream comes true for you.

      • littlestar says:

        Virg – you have such an awesome mom :).

      • H Dogg says:

        +1

    • IfUSaySo says:

      Maybe people say “you’ll change your mind one day” because they feel awkward that you’ve announced you “hate kids and don’t want them.” And smiling idiotically at that statement or saying “totally! Kids are the worst” isn’t something normal people say.

      That being said, asking someone when they’re going to have kids is rude af.

      • Isa says:

        VC that sounds a lot like my husband’s parents. He deals with it so much better than I would have. I think he’s a better father because of it. He doesn’t want his kids to feel that way. I get really annoyed and angry when people try to rewrite history or tell the same few stories over and over again bc they were hardly there.

    • JWQ says:

      I hate when people ask: “Who will take care of you when you’ re old?”. If that’ s the only reason you have to have children, you shouldn’ t have them in the first place! Everytime I get asked this I cannot help but think that these people only reproduced because they wanted a caretaker without paying them! It’ s terrible!

    • Other Kitty says:

      More than once I have had a person say to me, “but, but…who’s going to take care of you when you get old?”

      That is not a reason to have kids. I wanted kids, but it just didn’t work out and I had a hysterectomy for health reasons and now I can’t have them. Having children does not guarantee that they will care for you when you get old. My dad has friends who are an elderly married couple who have children, and the children really aren’t a part of their lives much. She is sick and the kids are nowhere to be found.

      My personal sensitivity to this is that I am continually asked why we aren’t having kids, when are we having kids, and told that I’m really missing out on something. Really? I didn’t know that. Thanks for making me feel like sh*t while letting me know I’m missing out.

    • Nikki L. says:

      +1, sistah!

  9. Isa says:

    She couldn’t lift delta for 6 weeks? Why not? Or did she mean her older kid? I’m confused.

  10. mia girl says:

    “Kristen says she fretted over Delta feeling unbonded because mommy couldn’t lift her for six weeks”

    I’m confused. For medical reasons I had to have my three children via C-section, and I don’t remember not being able to pick any of them up for six weeks after. I mean, you definitely have a longer recuperation period and the first week post-partum is painful… But most of the time I was home alone with them babies so I must have been picking them up!

    • mia girl says:

      OK. All cleared up. Looks like the original line in this post has been updated to refer to Lincoln, the older daughter. That make more sense. And I checked the story…

      “Lincoln was born via C-section, but with Delta, I wanted a vaginal birth, because I wanted to be able to come home and carry Lincoln. I did not want my toddler to feel rejected because Mommy couldn’t lift her for five or six weeks or whatever.”

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Oh, she must have weighed over twenty pounds, or whatever the lifting limit is after a C-section?

      • j.eyre says:

        Thanks for the clarification, mia girl. As GNAT asks – can you not pick up a certain weight child for 5 weeks? I had 2 Cs and no problem lifting anything; paramount was my wine glass, of course, and yes – it can weigh over 20 pounds at times.

        But, since all her friends told Ms. Bell that kids were “unmissable,” it seems she has been given much bogus advice.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        J.eyre
        Never had a baby, but just had abdominal surgery and am limited in weight I can lift for several months. I thought maybe it was the same for my SIL when she had a C-section, but I could be wrong. In fact, am often wrong. Cheers!

      • mia girl says:

        Yes GNAT and j.eyre – It’s like nothing heavier than a sack of potatoes or something (maybe Taterho would know if that is correct).

        20 lb wine glass sounds amazing… for me it was picking up that one late afternoon glass of cold Bass Ale that was most important. LOL

      • j.eyre says:

        YOU MEAN I COULD HAVE GOTTEN OUT OF DOING LAUNDRY FOR 6 WEEKS?!?

        Seriously, I am so getting this motherhood thing wrong.

      • **sighs** says:

        Mine told me not to lift anything heavier than my baby. He was 9lbs, for what it’s worth.

  11. Elisabeth says:

    What is she talking about not lifting her baby for six weeks after a c-section? they told me you can only lift the baby, nothing heavier.

    • Francesca says:

      Might she be referring to her older child? My drs said not to pick up anything heavier than my new baby when i had my c sectipn.

  12. tabasco says:

    Wow, this really p*ssed me off for some reason. And I generally like her. I don’t want have kids. I don’t have that strong desire that I’ve seen others get. Never have, never will. I’m SO tired of statements like this that suggest, however roundaboutly, that you are somehow missing out on something if you don’t have/want kids. You know what IS missable? All the people out there who have kids because they think they’re “supposed to” or for other crap reasons, and don’t raise them right.

    Those cloying commercials she does with Dax were already grating. Combined with this interview? Nauseau.

    “But I can now confirm having them is absolutely unmissable.” F*ck OFF.

  13. Franca says:

    I was born via C-section and turned out just fine and have a great relationship with my mum.

    I don’t like Kristen. She’s too preppy and perky for my taste. And her kids aren’t even 5 yet, stop being so preachy.

  14. Talie says:

    Every celeb who has kid thinks they’ve discovered electricity.

    • tabasco says:

      YES

    • meme says:

      they are so annoying and this one is more annoying than most. I guess she doesn’t care about the feelings of women who can’t have children or just didn’t have children.

    • Kitten says:

      This!
      I wish these people would just shut up, like, forever.

    • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

      The only celebrities I can think of that didn’t make any offensive statements about becoming parents are, as follows: RDJ (he spent all his time gushing over Susan AND basically just stating that he wants to have a baby with her),

      Christian Bale (rarely says anything about his private life BUT gushes over his wife more than his kids),

      Brad/Angelina (Angelina–I like that when she was pregnant with Shiloh, she made it all about how she was worried that she’d have to defend her adopted kids, and that she was worried if it WOULD be different….and both just otherwise gush about how their kids made THEM better people, not everyone should have lots of kids–which I find interesting, because a lot of big families like them–in the media at least–are always judgy),

      and Chris Pratt/Anna Farris–I think Anna has shared a few funny stories about their son. That’s about it.

    • chaine says:

      I just don’t take her parental wisdom, or the wisdom of anyone else whose kids are babies/toddlers, seriously. My friends and family were all like that when their kids were that age. Parenting was the world’s most awesome role and everyone should get a baby immediately.

      Now that their kids are in their teens/20’s, I hear all of their heartbreak over the child who doesn’t want to spend time with them any more because the child is an independent life form with its own desires and pursuits and not the parent’s “best friend” despite all the parent’s previously proclamations that their child and they were “best friends,” the child with alcoholism, the child with a mental health issue that got violent causing mom to have to call the cops, the child who got an underage girl pregnant, the child who stole money from the parent for drugs, the many MANY children who merely picked spouses/partners that their parents don’t like, the child that is “keeping the grandchildren” from them, the child who falsely (supposedly) accused the step-father of molesting them, and on and on and ON. And yes, most of the parents soldier on because they still love their kids just as much as they did in the beginning, but some of them say things like they don’t like their kids as a person, or they feel their “life’s work” is all for nothing because of how their kids turned out.

      So come back in 25 years, Kristen, and then tell me about what parenting is like, and I will pay attention to what you have to say.

      • WillowS says:

        @chaine-Very true! I was thinking the same thing when I read Kristen Bell’s comments. Children can be the biggest source of joy as well as the biggest heartbreak.

        I am childless/childfree sort of by choice, sort of by circumstance. It’s complicated. If my life situation had been different or if I was someone who always knew they wanted kids I would have had them one way or another (birth or adoption) but I was an “on the fence” person and now at 42 I feel like the moment has passed. I hate comments like Kristen Bell’s because they are so insensitive and myopic. She’s a rich woman who does not have to deal with the financial stressors of having children-for most people that’s not the case. It’s one thing to say that you love your children and that motherhood has changed you, it’s another thing to say that it’s “unmissable” for everyone. Not everyone wants to have children, not everyone can have children and most importantly not everyone should have children. To say that it’s absolutely “unmissable” for all women is just plain ignorant. So should women who can barely take care of themselves have kids?? Really?? I just heard a news story about a woman who left her son with quadraplegia in the woods while she visited her boyfriend for a week. Yeah, she should have had a child.

    • Ash says:

      I don’t think celebrity moms are the only moms who act as if they’re the first woman ever to bear children. Lol.

    • Angie says:

      LOL This is so true. It’s like Shailene Woodley about pretty much EVERYTHING!

  15. Algernon says:

    “Motherhood is unmissable”

    Is it, though?

    • tabasco says:

      NO. Not for everyone. Not for plenty of people. OK, MRS. DAX??

    • Kiddo says:

      There are several things I disagree with her on:
      1. Any inkling of attractiveness in Dax, first and foremost.
      2. The Nana couch dress
      3. Her tour of self-promotion propelled by the guise of stopping (nonexistent) pap stalkers following her and her husband.
      4. That motherhood is unmissable, as a statement in generalities. I’m okay if she feels that it was something she couldn’t miss.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      All my friends and siblings with children love them so much. But I can’t tell you how many of them have said to me “I wouldn’t trade them for anything, but it’s not fun. It’s not all coos and cute baby clothes. It’s hard as hell and they hate your guts often and it sucks 90% of the time.” So idk.

      • Mzizkrizten says:

        I agree! My childless friend is coming to terms with the fact she may never have kids due to her age and health issues and I was honest with her and told her I love my kids and would never return them but it’s a struggle that never really ends. I have a 20 year old and she still worries me and stresses me out and once she has a kid of her own that’ll be one more life for me to worry about endlessly. Being a single solitary soul who is only responsible for oneself seems kind of peaceful and nice. LOL
        I would personally say motherhood is more ‘hit or miss’ than ‘unmissable’.

      • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

        Ugh, I’m remembering my rough phase–which was a few years in total, and wasn’t anywhere near bad as my older sister, but I just wanted my mom to GO away. Like just go. Mainly because she was the enforcer, lol. And when we were in trouble with her, it was ten times worse than with our dad (plus he was always at work or school)…….I think all kids hate their parents at least for a year or two during their teen years….

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        Yes, I think you have to separate from your mother at some point and you do so by being a complete asshole. Or that was my method, anyway.

      • Who ARE these people? says:

        A veteran parent told me that adolescence is Nature’s way of preparing you for separation.

      • IfUSaySo says:

        Parenting is not all fun, all the time. It certainly has it’s tough moments. I would say it sucks 10% of the time, nowhere near 90% and has given me more joy than anything else in my life. But now, she they are fighting naps and requiring me to wipe their butts it’s tough. Even in the tough moments I know it’s unmissable FOR ME (not for everyone!) There is nothing else I’d rather be doing than parenting these kids.

      • Algernon says:

        It’s not even that I think having kids would be “fun” all the time or anything like that, I just do not want them. I do not have a strong maternal instinct, I have never developed one. I am glad that your baby is cute and healthy, but I have no desire to touch it or feed it or whatever you’re asking me to do with it. I was never a babysitter, I’ve never spent time around kids, and frankly, I have no interest in changing that now. The species can repopulate without me. Does that make me less of a woman or less complete as a person? Hell no.

      • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

        @Algernon
        I also find it annoying that some people assume that because you like kids, you love EVERYTHING about them, you like to discuss their puke/poop/spit up, etc, and you’re okay with ALWAYS babysitting. I like kids/babies/toddlers/etc. I love holding and kissing 5-6 months old babies. Just love it. But no, my life does not revolve around playing peekaboo, or babysitting whenever the parent wants. Some of my (younger) relatives are shocked that I say I want to have kids/adopt kids, but don’t want to babysit their kids (for free), or act weird when I say I don’t want to go into a baby store and look around for two hours (I hate shopping in general), or go somewhere JUST to see a baby. WTF?

      • littlestar says:

        “Yes, I think you have to separate from your mother at some point and you do so by being a complete asshole. Or that was my method, anyway.”

        GNAT, that’s so true, isn’t it. Animals will wean their young on their own, but when it comes to humans, it’s the children who most often have to wean themselves away from their parents. And I guess teenagers do it by “rebelling” and being jerks in general. I definitely was a little beyotch to my mom during my teenage years lol.

        Virg – one of my friends had a baby last year, and when he was 6 months old in December and I saw him…. My gahd he was sooooo freaking cute! I couldn’t stop cuddling him and kissing him. Just absolutely adorable, he was so fat and smiley. However. I still have no desire to have one of my own. LOL.

      • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

        @littlestar
        I just LOVE kissing babies–ones that are old enough to sit up. I wouldn’t even care if it was a stranger’s baby, lol (although I don’t). There’s something about that age…….probably their cheeks or something. Lol.

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        IfUSaySo
        I think the 90% comes from the fact that they are usually telling me this when they are upset or during a tough time. I’m sure they don’t really mean it, it’s just that few things can hurt you more or create such havoc. I think I am the recipient of such confessions because they don’t feel comfortable telling another parent that they are ready to murder their kids right now.

        @littlestar
        I was such a jerk to my mother at age 15. We were not allowed to really mouth off, but my attitude was one big eye roll. I still feel sad inside when I think of it, although she doesn’t seem to hold it against me. Lol

      • **sighs** says:

        In all honesty– I love my kid. He is the most amazing little person and I wouldn’t give him up for anything– but as I told a childless friend of mine a while back– I don’t think I would have been unhappy had I not had a kid. I just would have found other outlets.

  16. Mzizkrizten says:

    I did not get the impression that she was saying all women are missing out. She seems to be saying its unmissable for her. Why do women who don’t want kids get so bent out of shape when mothers talk about how much they love motherhood? Who’s got the chip on their shoulder?!

    • perplexed says:

      That’s how I read her statement too. I didn’t think she was really talking about other people. She used the word “I” a lot, so I just assumed she was talking about herself.

    • Kitten says:

      I feel like you would get it if you had to constantly listen to actresses talk about how amazingly awesome it is to NOT procreate.

      “The miracle of NOT giving birth is so life-changing and NOT giving birth is NOT to be missed and life is so much more worthwhile and amazing and fun WITHOUT children in it.”

      My hunch is that it would start to grate on you after a while.

      • Mzizkrizten says:

        That’s life, though, isn’t it? Everyone has their passion(s) and they sound off about their passion(s) and if your passion(s) differ it may be annoying to listen to but learning to filter out what doesn’t apply to you rather than allowing it to grate on you is key to enjoying life. IMO

      • Kitten says:

        Well, it’s not ruining my life.
        I’m just saying it’s kind of annoying.
        Am I allowed? 😉

        Look, it’s important to note that this “women with children are useless” message is part of a historically sexist view of women being nothing more than baby-making machines (cue the cartoons of the “old maid” and the “sad spinster with 100 cats”) who’s sole purpose is to wed and procreate. Add to that the fact that the choice to have kids or not is a very personal decision, and the grandiose statements about motherhood start to wear some of us down.

        This isn’t like celebs raving over the latest diet or the coolest new beauty product, it’s celebs raving over something that is ultimately quite intimate. Personally, I think it’s a topic that requires a great deal of thoughtfulness and sensitivity. I guess some of us felt that Bell’s comments were a bit thoughtless, that’s all. I’m sure it might seem like we’re being oversensitive but really, some of us are just a bit tired of the same narrative about the *IMPORTANCE AND JOY OF MOTHERHOOD* being trotted out by every celeb-who-made-a-baby.

        But please understand that at the end of the day, I’m happy for these people if they’re happy. Truly. I just wish sometimes society could value women for the intellectual, complex, and individual people that we are. That doesn’t mean motherhood as a topic should always be off-limits, just that it shouldn’t continuously drive the conversation. Then again, as someone said above, motherhood talk is a convenient and effective way to promote a new project so…eh.

    • BearcatLawyer says:

      Read her direct quotes in the article though. She claims “everyone” said motherhood was unmissable and that she can now confirm that. Maybe she meant it only for her personally, but that is not how it reads.

      Women like me do not get bent out of shape because women talk about how they love motherhood so much. It’s HOW they talk about it that pisses us off – like motherhood is a special sorority, that you cannot possibly understand true love until you become a mother, how non-mothers do not get how difficult it is to be a mother, etc., etc. For women like me who cannot have our own children, this holier-than-thou attitude is insulting and cruel. For women who do not want children or know that they are not emotionally, financially, or otherwise equipped to be a mother, it is obnoxious.

      People have managed to reproduce for centuries. That’s nothing special. Choosing to become a parent at an appropriate time and with the necessary resources and raising a healthy, well-adjusted, functional adult – those are REAL accomplishments we should all celebrate.

    • Argirl says:

      Amen!

  17. Skye says:

    I really like her and I want to give her the benefit of the doubt. Like, I binge watched The Fall last week and then proceeded to tell everyone I know that they have to watch it too. That being said, It’s a 10 hour commitment (and I was under slept and a little nuts from all the obsessive t.v. watching.) Maybe it’s time for those uber-mothers to ease up on the insistence that a choice that is going to be a life-time commitment is the ONLY choice to make. How about you just be pleased with yourself and keep all that smugness right there in your own house where you and your family can roll around in it all happy-like? The rest of us can handle our own life choices.

  18. Beth says:

    I am childless so forgive me for not understanding, but I don’t get why all these actresses have to be so insistent on preaching about motherhood. I am sure having kids is wonderful and your kids really are the most important thing to you, but why do all these actresses incorporate motherhood into their image and shove it down our throats 24/7? I know the popularity of celebrity pregnancies and kids has soared in the past decade or two, but is there nothing else they can talk about? It reeks of insecurity. It is like they recognize they have lost one aspect of their appeal, so they make the shift by to cater to the caravan mom crowd to maintain relevance.

    • Hannah says:

      Or maybe they’re happy about being mothers? Sorry but just because you think it’s insecurity, doesn’t mean it is. Everyone talks about things in their life that make them happy.

      • Beth says:

        You missed my point. You can be happy to be a mother and not be so preachy about it and force it down people’s throats 24/7. There are plenty of women who are mothers and love their kids dearly, while still having other things to talk about. When you have nothing else to talk about and get so darn sanctimonious about, yeah, that pretty much screams insecurity.

    • noway says:

      I think another likely cause is talking about your children gets you more publicity. Let’s be honest they work in Hollywood you have to use what you got. I don’t know what the extreme fascination is but the gossip world seems obsessed with babies, baby weight are they pregnant or is it just a burrito. Jennifer Anniston’s womb has probably a bigger google search profile than most famous people.

      • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

        I couldn’t believe there were such things as celeb baby sites. Like wtf? I mean, I don’t mind seeing celebrity kids. Sometimes I’ll make comments about them versus my own siblings or cousins (like my own little cousin is the same age as the JP twins, and all three just seem to have shot up in height and lost their baby faces), but other than that? If I never saw a picture of their kids again, I wouldn’t care. I wouldn’t care if I never saw a paparazzi photo of celebrities either…..in fact, bring on the half naked photo shoots for all my favorite male celebs (looking at YOU Liam….)!!!!

  19. FingerBinger says:

    Kristen is that annoying mom on facebook always posting pictures of her children. I still like her.

  20. Rachel says:

    As a mom of four who didn’t necessarily “choose” to start a family I can attest to the deep-in-the-depths-of-my-soul, primal love and ATTACHMENT I have with my children. I am driven to protect them in a way that I don’t feel driven to do for others I love – and that is most certainly something a person without children cannot understand. It is definitely a unique relationship but not ANY LESS SPECIAL than the love I have for my husband, other family, and friends. There are unique aspects to each type of relationship I have and I am happy and grateful for ALL the love I have in my life!

    • jc126 says:

      You cannot know how other people feel or understand. Really. None of us can ever truly know the depths (or heights, depending on how you look at it) of another’s heart and emotions.

    • Hannah says:

      I think that’s awesome and I don’t see what’s so hard about that for people to understand. Sometimes I feel bad for celebs for the way everyone puts words in their mouths.

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Rachel, just because you have limited emotions and imagination does not mean we all do. In my mind, I held my unborn baby in my arms thousands of times. I felt that love. I ached with it. I never got to share it, but I am capable of experiencing it. I have experienced it. So don’t tell me that is something a person without children cannot possibly understand. You don’t have the slightest idea what you’re talking about.

      • Rachel says:

        Wow. Nasty. I hope your unkindness made you feel better since it served no other purpose.
        I know my intent in what I wrote and it was never to belittle anyone else. We don’t all get to ACTUALLY experience every emotional situation in life and I’d never presume to know someone’s actual experience just because it was something I sincerely hoped to experience myself.
        Now back to my policy of never looking back at comments about my comments!

      • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

        I can see why you have that policy if all of your comments are as insensitive and uniformed as this one. MY unkindness? You “never presume to know someone else’s emotional experience,” yet the love you have for your children “is certainly something a person without children cannot understand.” Because you’re such a compassionate, deep person, and motherhood has matured and deepened you so much. As we can all see from your hateful response to me. I was not being “unkind” to you. I tried to honestly tell you that your words insulted and hurt me. You lack compassion and understanding for anyone not in your own situation.

      • Honeybee Blues says:

        Brava.

      • laura in LA says:

        What Rachel lacks is empathy, GNAT.

    • Kiddo says:

      “and that is most certainly something a person without children cannot understand.”

      How do you know what all other persons CAN feel? There are animal rescue people who put their lives on the line to save those in their charge. There is evidence demonstrating increased oxytocin in people who bond with other people and animals. There are adoptive parents who will go to the end of the world to provide and care for those children and love them as their own. The truth of the matter is that what you are saying is that it was something that YOU could not understand before.

    • Neonscream says:

      Lots of people who do have kids never experience that and plenty of people who don’t have kids do. Stop projecting your life experiences on to billions of people.

      For me the travel and work I do is something most people will never experience, I don’t bang on about how they’re missing out on anything.

  21. Isa says:

    I can think of plenty of people that should miss the experience of having kids.

    • BearcatLawyer says:

      +1000000

      Just because you CAN do something does not mean you SHOULD!

    • littlestar says:

      Yup. I said something similar above. There are a lot of crappy parents (if you can even call them that) out there who should never have had children.

    • laura in LA says:

      Agreed! What about those of us who like children and would’ve wanted them had life turned out differently? My younger sister was born when I was 8, and though it’s not like parenting, I took care of her from a young age, along with all the other childcare jobs I had as a teen.

      With that kind of intense love comes a lot of pain, and I realized very early on that raising children is hard and not all it’s cracked up to be. I knew that I wouldn’t/couldn’t do it myself unless the circumstances were right and I had the love, support and financial means. Now at 43, I’m coming to terms with the idea that the opportunity may have passed me by. And though I do feel a sense of loss, I’m afraid I also lack any desire for it now.

      Anyway, I think we’re all missing the point: Good Housekeeping is an old-fashioned magazine (so old I didn’t even realize it was still in print!) that targets a certain audience. Kristen Bell’s comments here, and that try-too-hard 50s print dress, are just the sort of thing this magazine sells/panders to its so-called readers.

    • Ash says:

      “I can think of plenty of people that should miss the experience of having kids.”

      You read my mind.

  22. applapoom says:

    I have never really liked her, since forever. I know practically everyone on celebitchy and pajiba love her but she has always rubbed me the wrong way. That she is so preachy about how great motherhood does not surprise me at all.

    I got two kids I adore myself but I see that jalg of my friends are perfectly happy childless. Not everyone wants or can have children. Ugh.

    • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

      Lol, I haven’t seen much of her to even love her. The only movie I’ve ever seen her “in” was “Frozen”….I don’t think that counts. She started getting more coverage with the #pedorazzi crap and when that Veronica Mars movie came out. I think her schtick/image is that she’s cute? Because I think I’ve seen more of her interviews than actual film/tv stuff. All I know is that she really loves sloths and goes on Ellen and cries a lot about them.

      For me, she’s just there. And she COULD have a career where she’s just known for being cute, not her judgy statements on motherhood and the paparazzi i.e. basically people know nothing about her, just her work…..but she doesn’t seem to want that.

  23. Nick says:

    Celebrities really should try harder to keep their personal lives to themselves because most of them are terrible boring people.

  24. Susan says:

    I never wanted kids til I hit 35ish and frankly, was unsure up til the birth and if I’m being totally honest, it took a while to really “get it” as I was terrified. It’s not an immediate magical thing for everyone and for what it is worth, I had a C section and didn’t “not hold the baby” for six weeks. Bollocks. I adore my children but if I hadn’t had them, I wouldn’t be a shell of a woman. People need to chill on the “my experience is GOSPEL” narrative. We are all different in our own special ways and what makes me happy might not. Are you happy and vice versa.w

  25. Jessiebes says:

    Don’t know who she is but she sure is full of patronising bs.

  26. IfUSaySo says:

    This discussion is so black and white. Either motherhood has changed the world for every woman on earth or it’s a total drag and we should all skip it’s, because it’s nothing spesh.

    Barring sociopaths, who are unable to love their kids, motherhood IS an monumental life- changing event. No one can deny that. You’ve created a life and you love that baby more than anything..ever! It changes your life and your priorities. Your world no longer revolves around you, the baby is your priority.

    That being said, it’s not for everyone and it doesn’t make you less of a person for not having a kid. Do you miss out on something? Yes. But we all miss out on certain things in life. I will miss out on: going to medical school, climbing Everest, having a sister, bring in the military. These are things that change your life and redefine you, that I will never have/do and I’m missing those experiences. Some are choices and some just happened. You cannot dismiss motherhood as no big deal, but you also cannot act like it is the only redeeming factor in life. If you are a mom, it is probably one of, if not THE biggest deal in your life. If you are not then your other experiences and choices, and accomplishments take the “unmissable” title for YOU. And both ways of life are perfectly valid!

    • GoodNamesAllTaken says:

      Well said. I don’t think most of the posters are denying that motherhood is a special, life changing event. I think the objection is merely to her implying that your life cannot be complete or full without it, or that you don’t understand what love is without it. And you’re right, of course you miss things if you’re not a mother, but you probably miss things no matter what.

    • Kiddo says:

      I will disagree with the sociopath part. Parents are humans like all humans. Some parents may love one kid more than another, or one not so much from the get, but that doesn’t necessarily make them sociopaths as the only outlier.

    • HoustonGrl says:

      I respectfully disagree with your comment that your “world revolves around you” if you don’t have kids. I feel like this is the no.1 misconception about childless adults. I believe in many ways that the opposite is true. Society expects MORE from you, not less, when you are childless. I am constantly covering for people at work, taking extra hours, helping relatives, friends who have to drop the ball because they have kids. Doing more for my parents than my siblings do because they have young kids and can’t always be there. I am expected to have a highly successful career “because” I don’t have kids. I do the vast majority of the traveling involved to see family and friends with babies and toddlers. Don’t get me wrong, it makes me happy. But there is a lot of defaulted responsibility on individuals without kids.

      • IfUSaySo says:

        Hmm, I never thought of it like that. From my own experience, before kids I did a lot. I took care of a home while working full time and managing a social life and marriage and working extra hours and helping relatives. It seemed like a whirlwind to me then. It wasn’t until I had kids that I realized all the things I was to do for myself. Little things I miss are being able to wake up and just lay in bed for awhile, maybe 25 minutes just for me. Maybe just on weekends, but not having to immediately tend to someone’s needs before my eyes are fully open. Being able to eat lunch where I want, or have afternoons by myself on Sundays. Not being in hyper vigilant mode all the time.

        Even though I was busy and did lots for others and my boss, my small decisions were my own. The freedom to make choices without considering the little human you created who means everything to you. If they aren’t happy, you aren’t happy. And that is a lot to put on someone’s heart. You don’t chose it, it just happens and it’s balanced equally with anxiety and extreme joy, When I say the “world revolves around you” I don’t mean it’s constant spa days and vacations. In general, once you have a kid, it’s an unstoppable need to consider every aspect of another persons life, because you are in charge of it 24/7. It is exhausting and it’s not something I ever felt until my child was born. Hope that makes sense and doesn’t come off preachy. Not my intention!

    • Neonscream says:

      Of course it’s a monumental life changing experience, it’s not the ONLY or even the MOST monumental and life changing experience. Ever saved someone’s life? I have, it changed me it was monumental. I don’t go around telling other people that if they haven’t tehyve missed out on something. It’s arrigant, presumptuous and really f’ing annoying to be bombarded with the “motherhood is the ultimate experience” message all the damn time.

    • Sue says:

      “It changes your life and your priorities. Your world no longer revolves around you, the baby is your priority. ”

      Disagree. Look around and see that these (though oft-quoted) are simply not universal truths of becoming a mother. And the parents involved do not have to be sociopaths. They can be self absorbed, mentally ill, addictive personalities, religious fanatics, you name it.

      I agree that motherhood often changes a person’s life and priorities. But there are plenty of people whose lives still revolve around them after the kids come. Plenty. There are also plenty of people for whom their baby/child is not their priority.

  27. Kelly says:

    She still has a career? She just keeps getting more annoying.

    • VirgiliaCoriolanus says:

      I don’t think she’s been in a lot of things. I’ve never heard of the tv show that she was on (Veronica Mars, which sounds like a Nancy Drew rip off), and she was the voice on Frozen. And I think she may have done a movie with Dax last year. No clue what she’s doing now.

      • Bridget says:

        You’re missing out. The first season of Ve ronica Mars was an all time great. Not Nancy Drew. Far, far from it.

  28. HoustonGrl says:

    I never like when people advocate having children by using their own child as a justification. I get why they do it, and I don’t fault them for loving the hell out of their kids, but it doesn’t apply to anyone else.

  29. Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

    Oh, shut up, B-list.

  30. Lisa says:

    Chill, everyone. Sh’s talking about herself. Maybe she felt like she didn’t need or want kids before, and now feels differently, so it feels like a big new world to her.

    I don’t want kids of my own, but when I became an aunt to twins, how I felt about kids changed. I always said I didn’t know how to handle them or was awkward around them, but it’s different when they’re yours! They bring me a lot of joy, and I wouldn’t trade them for anything in the world.

    • Naddie says:

      Same here. I used to be a full time horror films watcher, with or without kids on it. But I’ve became an aunt, I’m extremely sensitive about anything that use kids in dangerous situations. And yes, they bring me so much joy!

      • Lisa says:

        My mom is the same way! She used to watch true crime shows, and now she won’t if they involve kids, because they make her think of them. It changes you!

  31. The Original Mia says:

    Never been a fan. She’s always been smug and self-righteous. This only solidifies it. She has no idea how lucky she is to just decide she wants kids. For other people, like myself, there are issues that prevent that “unmissable part of life”. Up yours, Kristen!

  32. Dog Obsessed Girl says:

    Over the years, as a nuturing, but biologically childless person I have heard, “You are selfish,” “You are going to regret it,” “I would never be truly happy if I wasn’t a mom,” “I can’t wait to watch him play soccer,” and “I can’t wait to take her shopping and get her hair done for Prom, and see her walking down the aisle…”
    To these people, I want to say, “You’re the one who is selfish. That is an awful lot of weight on a little one’s shoulders. You’re making a baby 100% responsible for your life’s happiness,” but I don’t.
    I say, “I’m really happy with the choices I’ve made for my life.”

    • Ash says:

      Great post.

    • Jo 'Mama' Besser says:

      I agree, I’ve searched my mind as how it’s selfish and–I’m being genuine–I can’t understand what is selfish. Do people have some kind of responsibility for people who don’t exist? Who or what is being hurt by it?

  33. Honeybee Blues says:

    Well, I’m probably going to get hammered for this, but I was certain that motherhood was my future. I have a strong nurturing side, love cooking, etc. Then, in my mid-20s, I was working in D.C. in a field where I was the youngest by far, so a lot of my female colleagues/friends began getting married and having kids. What I saw were ruined lives, by MY estimation, not theirs. They seemed genuinely happy, but to me they became unbearably boring. Again, they were boring to ME. What informed my future decision not to have children was what I saw happen to the lives of my friends who did, and I didn’t want that at all. I had a front row seat to what that would really be like, and I ran for hills, because it wasn’t for ME.

    Fast forward a couple of decades, and I have had about half dozen close female friends confide to me that they love their children unconditionally, but if they had it to do all over again, they wouldn’t. Again, this is anecdotal to MY friends and experiences, but they served as a huge dose of reality to me, someone who had idealized motherhood into an exalted state unreachable by any other means. I learned otherwise. It just seemed like a minimum of 18 years of indentured servitude, and no thanks.

    In conclusion, people like Ms. Bell appear to be lacking in imagination to make such sweeping statements about the abject necessity of motherhood to reach our ultimate selves. I don’t find it insulting, I find it embarrassing for her. Truly embarrassing. And insensitive to those who can’t. And for those asking, “Who cares what a celebrity says” the answer is simple: when one is a public persona, one has certain responsibilities, and insensitive, and frankly, dumbass comments like “unmissable” are sloppy and unprofessional, and she or her publicist should know better.

    • littlestar says:

      Wow. I feel like you are me. Your reasons for not wanting children are very much my own reasons as well. I look at those close to me (family and friends) who have children, and I absolutely do NOT want their lives. I know most people love their children with all of their heart, but most people I know who have kids just seem so unhappy most of the time. I love my free time, the ability to do what I want, when I want.

    • Beatrix says:

      I think this is the best (or my favorite) comment on this whole stream.:)

    • Ash says:

      I’ve never wanted children, but what you said speaks to me. Almost word for word. Watching what parents go through on a daily basis only solidified my desire not to become a parent.

      I’ve never regretted the decision.

  34. Kate says:

    I think I’m gonna sit this one out, Kristen Bell. No kids for me…I’m a teacher and have gobs of children every day that I’m happy to send home at 2:30 in the afternoon!

    *grin*

  35. Bridget says:

    I love my children more than anything. But this comment really bugs me. Different people make different choices, and not everyone wants to be a parent. And it is a great, great privilege to be able to choose for ourselves whether or not we want to have children.

  36. E.M. MAXX says:

    She’s an insensitive twat

  37. H Dogg says:

    I totally agree that motherhood is Karma. I never understood how much my mother loved me until I had a child, that’s just me though, maybe I was too selfish to realise it before (don’t want to offend anyone who figures this out for themselves).
    I can’t wait for the teenage years when I will get my comeuppance.

    People are getting quite offended by her statements, but it is just a reflection of how she feels and how motherhood made her feel. I think it’s interesting to hear how it effects people and changes them.

  38. EnidRollins says:

    Meh. Like most celebs, she should be careful not to generalize, but I’ve read worse. I loved Veronica Mars and found Dax lovable on Parenthood, so I’ll cut them some slack.

    I’d much rather read about a mom who is over-effusive about motherhood or her children than see one who neglects or ignores her child. (Ditto for dads.)

    Speaking from experience, the first few years of child-rearing are like crack cocaine. The highs are so high, and the lows are so low. It’s easy to be consumed by it, and I think nature intended it that way.

    I have marathon friends who say running is unmissable; I have adrenaline friends who say base jumping is unmissable. We all have something we’re passionate about and hope to sell others on.

  39. Me too says:

    Again, I wish more men visited this site because the super feminist slant can rule the conversation. As a parent, I agree with her POV to a point. The love I have for my child is like an intense love affair or crush….like that feeling you have in the first few months of a relationship. Yet, it never fades. All mothers are different though. Why do we feel the need to attack and nitpick every quote from a celeb? At this point, I wonder why they give interviews at all. They aren’t politicians, they are celebrities and I find it perfectly fine for them to express their ‘truth’. At the same time, I can see the other side of the coin. I CHOSE to only have one because I wanted to ‘live my life’ and have freedom to travel and still have a sense of self. Every person is different. Let it go.

    • RobN says:

      That’s the problem, she doesn’t seem to grasp that every person is different. She seems to feel that her opinion on a purely subjective question is the only appropriate opinion and those who have a different one are simply wrong.

      Her “truth” is just that, hers. Her statements imply that it ought to be everybody’s.

  40. Vampi says:

    I honestly have NO clue who she is. I’ve only seen her mentioned here, one other time having to do with a pap sitch, and a DirecTv commerdial with her hubby…that Dax fellow. I don’t know who he is either but he looks sorta like that dude from Scrubs. *Kanye shrug*

  41. Vava says:

    I don’t feel too badly about missing out on motherhood. It’s not a life experience that I ever wanted, and I took steps to ensure I wouldn’t find myself in that situation. Some people just know when they aren’t interested, and I was one of them.

    That said, I’m glad there are people who really enjoy it. My mom was a great mom and my brothers and I had a wonderful childhood with her and our dad. Our parents weren’t wealthy by a long shot, but we had such great adventures with them during our youth. And we knew they loved us. It does really just boil down to that, I think.

  42. Wisteria says:

    Ok Kristen is all about the motherhood gig. Right now. Her children are very young. They are at the sweet cuddly cute stage. This will not last unfortunately. They will get older, be obnoxious and sometimes horendous creatures to live with. One may think (on more than one occasion) about getting in the car and driving very far away for a little while to escape the misery that comes with parenting (no matter how rich you are). You will probably never get in the car and actually do this. I think it would be regreshing to hear someone speak of motherhood in a more truthful way. I love my children dearly, they are grown-ups now. But I remember a trip to Lego-land that was called “family fun”. I called “family fun” an oxymoron on that one. Sorry, I know I will get nailed for this. Just wanted a little honest motherhood thougts of my own to share.

  43. Naddie says:

    Motherhood is a choice. But by the eyes of society, it’s still a woman’s duty, that’s why is so annoying (to say the least) when someone comes up saying that “being a mother is an unmissable part of life”. She could’ve said “my life” and things would’ve been just fine.

  44. RobN says:

    You can say virtually anything as long as you preface it with “For me”. I don’t know why it’s so hard to understand that you don’t get to speak for everyone; your opinion is just that, your opinion.

    • Naddie says:

      Unless it’s a real hard job shoved in women’s throat by decades, like motherhood, I kinda agree with you.

  45. paranormalgirl says:

    It’s “unmissable” to HER. I am quite satisfied with my two spawn (love their butts to DEATH), but without them, my life would not be better or worse, just different.

  46. Nikki L. says:

    Cool, she can keep squeezing out kids, and I’ll keep my freedom.

  47. Neonscream says:

    Unmissable for her maybe, not for everyone. She might also want to think that’s a really hurtful statement for people who do want kids but can’t and shut up.

  48. Lili says:

    The whole interview comes off as an ad for Super Mom. Yuck! And the comment about how having kids is an unmissable part of life is a bit… stupid, I agree with previous commenters on this. Sure, that’s HER opinion, and I’m perfectly sure she really feels like that. But that’s just that. HER feelings. They don’t apply to everyone, some people don’t agree with her. Some people actually regret having children. Others never have them, either because they can’t have children for biological reasons, or because they don’t want to have them. It’s not like a life with children necessarily is better than a life without them, it all depends on who you are as a person and where you are in life. And I can only imagine how a childless person desperately wishing to have their own kids must feel after reading this interview. Not to say Kristen Bell is responsible for the feelings of all childless people in the world, just that the comment seems a bit arrogant.

    Also kinda wondering why she’s almost always dressed like she’s 40+…

  49. Ladytron2000 says:

    Insufferable twat. Why hasn’t she gone away yet? How does she generate magazine covers? (Even if it is Good Housekeeping.)