Desperate for attention, Posh appears almost naked in another Armani ad

armani-a

Victoria Beckham has made a big deal about how she doesn’t like how she looks like naked. But for a woman who claims to hate the appearance of her bare flesh, she sure as hell seems to like ripping her clothes off for the camera. Could it be that Posh just says that stuff to try to make herself relatable and likeable? Or even more likely, that she says it to get attention? And just in case that doesn’t get her the needed headlines, she might as well strip down to her skivvies and bare nearly all.

She has complained in the past of ‘looking really awful naked’, yet it seems Victoria Beckham can’t resist peeling off when it comes to Armani photo shoots.

Reclining backwards onto a bed wearing nothing but skimpy underwear, black stilettos and her trademark pout, this is the ex-Spice Girl’s latest lingerie ad for the fashion giant.

In these new pictures, the mother-of-three shows off a considerably more curvy figure than she is usually known for.

Her provocative pose, assisted by some clever lighting, shows her toned legs and stomach and rounded bottom as she stretches backwards.

The flattering shadows in the photo reveal a body most women would envy.

It’s not the first time Posh has peeled off her clothes for Armani – in the past she has joined her semi-naked husband David to advertise the lingerie.

[From the Daily Mail via Gossip Rocks]

The Bechkams have a $64 million deal with Armani. I don’t care how you feel about your body, I bet 99% of people would strip down to their underwear for $64 million. Especially with good lighting. Victoria looks a teeny, tiny bit curvier in the photos, but that could easily be due to the shadows. She does have a bit more of a butt than usual, which looks good on her. A while ago she made this huge deal about how she doesn’t like her stomach and how she has sagging skin as a result of her three pregnancies. She either had that sag taken care of or she was massively exaggerating things, because I don’t see a millimeter of excess anywhere.

Posh isn’t wanting for money. I think if she had any of the body confidence issues she claims, she wouldn’t strip off her clothes – lighting and retouching be damned. She’s probably just trying to seem more accessible and relatable to women, but I don’t think it’s working. She’s certainly getting the desired attention though.

Here’s Victoria Beckham leaving Scott’s restaurant in London on March 13th. Images thanks to WENN .

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

22 Responses to “Desperate for attention, Posh appears almost naked in another Armani ad”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Enonymous says:

    She has nice legs.

  2. michellle says:

    Talk about bending over backwards for attention, though her figure looks great. Not as thin as usual, even her breasts look less ridiculous.

  3. viper says:

    *barf* P.Sed

  4. geronimo says:

    Agree, who wouldn’t pose for that amount of moolah? I like Vicky B but the one thing she’s not is sexy, and even less so when she tries hard to be sexy.

  5. GossipGossip says:

    She’s super ugly. I know it’s mean to say, BUT like what’s with the popularity. She doesn’t eat and she has cartoon boobs. I guess I’m used to thinking that beautiful people should be in magazines and such. Icky poo

  6. lilirose says:

    she is so photoshoped it is scary! everyone can look like this.

  7. Allie says:

    Ok, I’m confused. She had C sections with all 3 of her boys. I’ve seen loads of other PICS where she doesn’t show her stomach because of the scarring. So this has to be all photo shopped, yes?

  8. EnKay says:

    I love these ads.

  9. Kimble says:

    I’d look like that if they photoshopped me too! OK, it might take an army of techs but …

  10. MissMara says:

    Very subtle pose…

  11. DEe says:

    photoshop on….some poundage

  12. Asiont says:

    great body!

  13. Kathi says:

    If I laid back like this, you’d see any of my ribs. And I’m not skinny at all, just normal weight.
    Photoshopped deluxe!

  14. buenavissta says:

    @ Allie: I had C-sections (and a VERY good surgeon) and I can tell you that the scar is very low, at the pubic line, and in my case, becoming less visible as the years go by. Easier to photoshop out than ribs!

  15. Gistine says:

    I know why she looks so pissed in every picture…she’s fecking hungry!

  16. heh-heh says:

    <>

    I’d like to cure her of this anxiety, preferably in a ritzy hotel. At her expense, of course.

  17. heh-heh says:

    ^^ This quote should’ve been at the top:
    “Victoria Beckham has made a big deal about how she doesn’t like how she looks like naked. ”

    FTFMe

  18. Ana says:

    I think her body looks great in this picture…but she does look curvier. In the paparrazi pictures she always looks gaunt and in this she looks like a woman!
    A friend of mine had a c-section and her scar was horizontal at the top of her pubic hair and very small. So her scars probably are not that bad.
    In any case, I don’t think she gained more than 20 pounds with her pregnancies…

  19. jess says:

    i would pose like that for free if my body looked like that!

  20. nag says:

    It is all airbrushed to make her look like she has a figure, so she can’t really see that much of herself to hate…

  21. Larissa says:

    I think her face is more photoshoped than her body! lol

  22. Aspen says:

    Okay, that just looks painful, quite frankly. Hot…but painful.