Ben Affleck’s nanny gets a police escort to get papped driving in her convertible

Christine Ouzounian Runs Errands In Her New Lexus
These photos are of Christine Ouzounian running errands and outside her home yesterday. She’s showing off her fresh blowout and her new convertible Lexus, which retails for $43,000. The bag she’s carrying is a $478 Henri Bendel, according to the Daily Mail, which doesn’t sound too outrageous to me considering the price of some celebrity handbags. Multiple photo agencies had these photos, which means that they were either alerted that Christine would be home at that time or that they were camped outside her home. She’s been staying at the Hotel Bel-Air so which do you think it was?

The best part of this story is that Ouzounian got the police to come over to her house to protect her from the paparazzi. The she put the top down on her car and went shopping at Sears. She got a police escort to go shopping at Sears. You can make this stuff up. (More photos of her day are on The Daily Mail.)

On Tuesday, Ouzounian went out to eat at a popular expensive restaurant with her friends. She was seated outdoors of course and “someone” (a friend of hers) took photos of their lunch and then sold the pics to Entertainment Tonight. This is exactly how she leaked the two sets of bikini photos poolside at the Hotel Bel-Air – she had someone else take the pictures to make it look like she was famous enough to get recognized and photographed. Some photos show her on the phone and ET says that she has “been adamantly keeping up with media coverage of herself.” Of course she is.

So what’s going on? Did Ben dump her and is she trying to stick it to him? My theory is that she did sleep with him but that he’s trying to pull away without upsetting her. She has something big on him, maybe photos and video. The divorce announcement was right after the Vegas trip. Maybe Ben finally picked an indiscreet sidepiece who wants a piece of his fame and money. We definitely know that she likes luxury. E! Online estimates that her hotel stay has been around $20k, which is substantially higher than People’s $12k figure. People has sources claiming Ben is not paying for her hotel stay (Ben is the source) and another source claiming he is (Christine is that source).

TMZ reports that Ben is not talking to Christine and that he “is not funding the new, lavish lifestyle of his former nanny.” What if she’s just a clever con artist who knows her celebrity gossip? What if Ben is telling the truth? I mean we know he can’t keep it in his pants, but who would believe him over her? Maybe she’s the one who told Garner about the Vegas trip. I need to know the real story!

Christine Ouzounian Gets A Police Escort From Her House

Christine Ouzounian Runs Errands In Her New Lexus

Christine Ouzounian Gets A Police Escort From Her House

photo credit: FameFlynet

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

278 Responses to “Ben Affleck’s nanny gets a police escort to get papped driving in her convertible”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. lisa2 says:

    If I lived in LA I would be complaining.. these officers could have been else where. WHY is this acceptable.. someone should be calling every news outlet and complain about resources being used this way.

    she wants to be photographed.

    • SNAP says:

      A lot of posts have mentioned how well the nanny seems to have planned it…but it all seems way too convenient. Who is getting a direct benefit from his scandal? It’s almost like a grand finale, the one whose reputation looks the shiniest may be the brains behind it all …what if Garner orchestrated the whole nanny-gate plot??? She had to have known Affleck would bang anything with a skirt on it, so to get rid of him easily while keeping her reputation intact, dangle the nanny carrot and then let it all explode on him…it just seems awful convenient, you know? What if Garner is like the character in the Gone Girl movie? Conniving, calculating, smartly vengeful and the nanny is the perfect accessory, for the right amount and 15 minutes of fame whoring she could help bring a douche down. What if the nanny is using money Garner paid her specifically to keep making Doucheffleck look worse and worse. Payback for 10 years of misery…huh…hell hath no fury like an ex-wife scorned…IF (and this is a huge if) so, well played Garner, well played. I gotta get me some notes on how to pull an Alfred Hitchcock like outcome

      • bellenola says:

        If that were true I would love it SO MUCH. 🙂

      • dippit says:

        I don’t think so, but this is so atypical in the way it’s playing out it is difficult to distinguish who is running the various sub-plot narrative for which outlets, anything is possible.

        *If* then Garner is gonna want her seed-money back from Nanny. She is so overplaying her own fameho moves that people are tipping into some sympathy for Ben. Also, and this includes me, beginning to wonder if Ben may be telling some truth this time.

      • perplexed says:

        I think Ben did something with the nanny; otherwise, he could easily shut her down. But he’s not doing anything pro-active. Although I suppose he’s letting her hang herself — at some point, she’s going to irritate everyone to the point that we’d wish she’d go back into anonymity.

      • lowercaselois says:

        Wow, Ben must have really been
        a real bad boy, because the nanny obviously is holding something over his head to get the loot she is getting. It almost looks like extortion. Maybe, he is also protecting other people, she may have witnessed friends of his doing bad boy things in Vegas.

      • dippit says:

        @Perplexed Ben has said she was only a “friend and confidante” at a time when his marriage broke down. He’s a drunken self-destruct merchant longtime. But maybe the something that happened wasn’t the typical and obvious sex. Maybe he was fool enough to ‘confide’ something to her thinking she was a safe platonic ear. Now she’s holding that something over him but making hay on a fantasy affair.

        Just a theory but her tale of love and lusting is convincing because of his past rep, yet some things just aren’t adding up.

      • Dee Kay says:

        This is my husband’s theory as well. He says Garner needed a ho who would be willing to be photographed, someone who would be the “face” of Affleck’s cheating and Garner’s being 1000% justified in divorcing him, someone who would be willing to basically go on the record as the representative of Affleck’s douchebaggery. If Garner hired the nanny specifically for this purpose, maybe she discussed it with the nanny and told her what her “real” job was, or maybe she just realized the nanny would totally famewhore it up if given half a chance.

      • MoxyLady007 says:

        She would never do that to her kids. Through the past ten years, the one thing everyone has said about her is that she is a great mom. She loves her kids and puts them first. As awesome as a plot like this on her part would be, she would never do it because it would hurt her kids.

      • Merritt says:


        You would have to believe that Garner hates her children to do that. That is why the constant stretching of “what if Garner is like Amy Dunne” narrative falls flat. Garner seems like a loving mom. Amy Dunne, only loved herself.

      • ladyg says:

        I don’t know, I’d have to say that Ouzzie’s presence HELPS shield the kids. All we’re talking about now is Nanny Ouz (Sorry, I am having brain block when it comes to her last name for some reason). In a way, she’s a very effective smoke screen / shield. All the stuff about Ben’s philandering has been out there for years anyway, so this isn’t going to hurt the kids any more than it probably already has. After all, we’ve been concentrating on Ouz’s picture for several days now — not Jen and Ben who are working, and the kids who are probably dealing with less paparazzi, cause Ole Ouz’s is the rabbit chaser. And who knows: maybe Jen’s PR person convinced her it was the best chess move.

      • K says:

        The only way Garner could have orchestrated this is if the nanny was in on the whole thing… but how much money would she need to be paid? “Please let me absolutely destroy your reputation as long as there is a Google to display it, even though you have a really unusual surname and the plan involves blanket media coverage of your cheating with my husband while caring for my kids and under my roof…” I just can’t imagine someone falling for that suggestion unless there were plural millions on the table plus a guaranteed job at the end of it.

        Though my favourite twist would be if she’d never slept with him at all, just went along with a setup of Garner’s.

        I don’t believe a word of any of it. Agree Garner wouldn’t hurt her children that much. But it would be nice to think that things weren’t as awful as they look for Garner, and she just let Affleck’s well-earned reputation hang him, when for once his hands were clean.

        Also: this story feels like light relief after the Rutherford thing. At least these kids are well loved and sensibly mothered.

      • Merritt says:


        I don’t see how the kids are shielded from anything. This story has been all over the internet, all over the magazines, and all over entertainment tv. Violet is almost 10, it is unlikely she has not seen any of the coverage. Also given how mean some kids can be, with all the coverage, it is only a matter of time before some playmate or classmate says something to the older two kids if it hasn’t already happened. Even under the theory that Jen set everything up, in no universe can she control whether any other former/current women come forward with their story about Ben. If anything seeing the nanny parade around with media attention might encourage anyone who has nothing to lose to sell her story. People like Blake (rumored affair) have too much to lose to come forward.

      • ladyg says:

        Of course your right K. I’m just gossip genie praying that this is all some sort of orchestrated public relations dance that, in the end, would have made David Foster Wallace proud. Like, in a month or two, Ben and Jen are all: Look, Ouz is our nanny and Ben’s cousin; they never slept together; she’s been with us for a long time; we asked her to take the spotlight for us, because we knew the press and public would eat it up, and it gave us time to do X, while you were looking over at Y. Now, be ashamed of your collective selves for being so gulible! Ouz isn’t going anywhere; she was a true team player, and we will forever be in-debted to her! OK, ok, ok – I know. Life isn’t really some sort of post-modern Miss Marple…..but oh man I wish it were. It would be so, so, so delicious!

      • lisa2 says:

        I don’t see Jennifer G. being behind the Nanny. If she did do that then she would be subjecting herself to blackmail and losing custody of her children if something like that ever came out. Not withstanding her doing that to the father of her children. No she didn’t need to do any of that. The Nanny is either being funded by Ben (which would be a dumb move on his part; because he would be paying for ever) or some tabloid is getting her these perks for a limited time.

    • laura in LA says:

      lisa2, that’s all I care to comment on today about this nanny-ho con-artist nonsense: Who paid for that police escort?!

      Because if it was us LA taxpayers, I’m pissed!!!

      • Thick of it says:

        I doubt that the nanny gets a police escort paid for by the taxpayer because she might be under threat. She is not in danger to be attacked by anybody. So there wasn’t any law court who assigned her police protection. So somebody definitely pays for her police escort.

        Either Ben is lying and the nanny is able to wrestle a lot of money out of his pockets.
        Or somebody else is funding the nanny’s lifestyle. It doesn’t have to be Garner, it could as well be some rival of Ben or some studio which wants the ruin of Ben or it could be some tabloid …

    • LA Juice says:

      She didn’t go shopping at Sears- she parked at the Santa Monica Sears (rather than pay for parking like the rest of us plebs) walked through Sears (to throw the parking attendant off) and then went shopping at Neiman’s, Tiffany’s and Sax, across the street. What a dirty bitch whore.

      • Palar says:

        Calm down, calling someone a dirty bitch whore for going shopping and getting free parking is more than a little offensive and OTT.

  2. Zapp Brannigan says:

    On tonights installment of Mother May I Sleep With Danger(ous Nannies) a Lifetime original story.

  3. Sullivan says:

    So very thirsty. She should be checked for diabetes.

    • Krista says:

      Zing! I love a good medical joke.

    • Joy says:

      Exactly. She is the most smug, thirsty b**** I’ve seen in a while.

    • NGBoston says:

      This B*tch. So
      verrry thirsty indeed.

    • MG says:

      Yes!! So I’m confused about the timeline of everything. When they first announced the divorce they were in the Bahamas to shield their kids from everything, they made it sound planned and a long time coming…but…is this whole psycho nanny thing the reason they announced the divorce? Jen found out they boned in the Bahamas before she got there, then found out he took her to Vegas with him?

      • Celebitchy says:

        @MG: The timeline is so confusing I almost asked Kaiser yesterday for help. These two stories have the timeline. They didn’t announce the divorce until right after The Bahamas, they made it seem like it was all planned but they announced right after Jen found out about the nanny. Read this People US Weekly article:

        They claimed the “counsciously uncoupling” angle for a while, but Jen had found out about the nanny at that point and I assume didn’t want it to get out. My take is that the nanny came out and shifted the narrative and they had to admit it, but I don’t know.

      • Bridget says:

        Nope, the nanny is not the reason they announced the divorce. She came afterwards, but Garner appears to have used this is a way to spin the divorce her way.

        And the Bahamas was after they announced the split, with that supposedly being where Jennifer found out about this whole mess.

      • Kiddo says:

        From July 3rd:

        Jennifer Garner And Ben Affleck Are Hiding Out With Their Kids In The Bahamas
        When you’re rich, famous and don’t want your old friends the paparazzi stalking you to get the first pictures of you “STEPPING OUT AFTER THE DIVORCE NEWS,” you pack up your kids and fly off to your house in the Bahamas. Every casino in the Bahamas is calling in their best counting cards catcher, because Ben Affleck is there right now.
        Page Six, TMZ, UsWeekly and every other media outlet who was on the CC list that Bennifer 2.0’s publicist sent out say that right around the time they announced that their marriage was done, they traveled to the Caribbean. Page Six’s source says that Ben and Jennifer Garner’s first priority is their three kids and they knew that if they stayed in L.A. the paps would’ve followed them around while screaming, “Oh, oh, so now that you’re getting a divorce you want nothing to do with us? It’s like that, huh?” Ben and Jennifer just want to spend some quiet family time together in the Bahamas.

        On June 30th:
        Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner Announce Divorce After 10 Years of Marriage

        Unless they were actually in the Bahamas before June 3oth and released the pap pictures later, this story doesn’t add up. ANd now I’m full of shame and dread that I actually took the time to seacrh this.

      • laura in LA says:

        Don’t feel too bad, Kiddo. I’ve lost most of the summer to following this. When oh when will this nanny nightmare end???

    • MG says:

      Thanks @Celebitchy. I think part of the confusion is he was in the Bahamas, then left, then came back. I dont know, it’s all shady. At the end of the day, I think he started up with the nanny as soon as she started working for them, he tried to pull back at some point which made the nanny snap. He’s now probably trying to placate her so she doesn’t do some tell-all on Dr. Phil or something. Ben is such a typical Hollywood cliche.

      • Celebitchy says:

        Sure! The timeline is that Garner found out about her husband and the nanny on 6-29 according to People US Mag. They announced on 6-30 using the conscious uncoupling angle but we didn’t hear about the nanny until later, because I don’t think Garner wanted it to get out. I only think she played that wronged wife angle when the nanny started leaking to the tabloids and she had no choice.

        Edit: They may have planned to announce definitely, but according to People’s timeline Garner found out about the nanny the day before.

      • The Original G says:

        I think he was behind the push to announce, so that he could protect his future Batman money. She’s going around wearing a ring and making reconciliation noises to try to claim her own stake on that cash.

        Nanny proves that no such reconciliation was attempted. Benefit Ben.

    • katy says:

      Yes, so much THIRST in this one. In addition to the Jen and Ben thing, I’m starting to suspect her of the CA drought, too.

    • belle de jour says:

      So thirsty that I keep expecting her to bring out her own line of ouzo. Noxious Naxos Nanny.

  4. perplexed says:

    Her shoes don’t look good here. I’m surprised she didn’t do something about that…

    • Jen43 says:

      She needs to up her feet game. I am pretty sure she is reading this, and we will see an improvement ASAP.

      • frivolity says:


      • here's Wilson says:

        I love converse and I’m wearing those exact shoes today!

      • bettyrose says:

        I practically lived in those shoes in the 80s (circa junior high) and have noticed twentysomethings sporting them lately. They’re cute for a normal person but on her it looks like try-hard for a”celebrity casual” look.

      • Anon says:

        Speaking of shoe games, Jennifer must have read comments about her ugly old lady shoes. She’s improving somewhat.

  5. chaine says:

    o. m. g. at this point i am thinking she must be Rachel Uchitel’s little sister or something.

    • Amy Dunne says:

      She is the rielle hunter of mistresses, all we need is a pregnancy and it will be complete. I hope not though or we’ll be hearing about her for the next decade!

    • Pandy says:

      YES! Total resemblance. She needs to change her jeans, they aren’t doing much for her. She just looks short and that she has big calves. But wow, is she ever enjoying the attention …

  6. Krista says:

    Lol. She’s a pretty girl but there is absolutely nothing recognizable about her. I’ve read every post on here about her and if I bumped into her on the street I would have no idea who she was.

    • Olenna says:

      IKR, and the chick’s got no style.

    • Dani says:

      I couldn’t pick her out of a lineup. She’s very typical blonde dyed hair, spray tan and big sunglasses. Next.

    • Chichi says:

      Shes cute in Kansas but is this even a 6 in Bel Air? Watch the video of her going into Sears before you answer. Wide but unfortunately flat ass. Short chubby legs, boobs nothing special. Face ok, I guess. I dont mean to body shame justan objective observation.

      And she has put on weight significant weight around the thighs since Vegas white jeans. Pregnant or lazy poolside gorging?

      • frivolity says:


      • Jayna says:

        I said the same thing. She has thighs in all of her photos shot from paps, and no thighs in the white jeans photo she released. I call photoshop also.

      • Pandy says:

        Agree. I just posted above that her jeans aren’t doing her any favors. She is a 6 in Bel Air, you are so right.

      • Illyra says:

        I wonder if she also photoshopped in the Superbowl rings? lol

        Jk… kind of.

      • dos equis says:

        I’m gonna go with lazy poolside gorging with no cares because she knows it’ll look like she’s preggers. And if she really is… oh, dear.

        Also, I don’t understand why she went to Sears? She could’ve gone to Bloomingdale’s which is just across the street, and then when the paps left gone to Sears (if she must, that place feels like entering a time machine into a mall circa 1993).

      • laura in LA says:

        That must’ve been a distorted/photoshopped picture of her on the plane.

        In the one from a few months ago of her in the wide striped sweater following far behind Ben and the kids, she looks pretty dumpy and disheveled. And I don’t feel badly at all about saying that because someone so delusional and destructive as this deserves a reality slap in the face.

        That photo cracks me up because while they look disinterested, just going about their business, she couldn’t be happier to get papped.

    • Andrea S. says:

      @Krista she may be pretty, but she’s one of he most basic bitches I’ve ever seen in my life & I’m surrounded by them daily! Look at all she’s been blowing this money on lately: everything that’s in(or, was recently in.)

      Anyone else notice on some of the DM pics she’s not wearing the white Chucks but what look like the Chanel black linen espadrilles? I can’t get a clear close up, but I’d know them a mile away & those retail for @ $645…see, basic bitch

    • K says:

      Same. I couldn’t pick her out of a lineup if I had my kids’ lives on the line. She’s just your generic girl who is pretty enough with good grooming, really.

      Just as well for her, though. I mean, this is only famous if you prefix the “in”.

    • Granger says:

      I agree, but then, there are a lot of actresses in H-wood that are just as generic-looking, and Jen Garner is one of them. She’s taller and slimmer than the nanny, but if it weren’t for the magic that an elite team of stylists and make-up and hair artists can employ, she wouldn’t turn any heads on the street either. We’ve all seen her average-mom look, and most of the time, she really does look like one of the moms in the yard at my kids’ school. It’s only when she’s man-handled by experts for a red carpet appearance that she suddenly looks like a Star. She’s always been one of the best examples, in my opinion, of how pretty much anyone can be transformed by good hair/make-up and the right lighting.

      Not sure where I’m going with this, other than to say that it’s obvious Ben wasn’t banging the nanny because she was hotter than his wife.

  7. meme says:

    Please tell me this is a joke. This trick is getting LAPD escorts now to and from her daily pap session?

  8. Starrywonder says:

    Man I don’t want to believe Affleck but I have a bad feeling he put his peen in her once and this trick went Fatal Attraction crazy. And now he’s trying to be done and she’s all like you will not ignore me Ben. The only reason I can see Jen Garner hanging with him this weekend. He looked so relieved when she was with him. I’m sure he’s like please make this better. And if Affleck is dumb enough to talk to this crazy after this mess he gets what he deserves.

    • Pandy says:

      I don’t even think this is really about “getting Ben back”. I think she’s hoping to parlay her fame for screwing a married actor into a reality show. Isn’t that the payoff to the “fairytale” nowadays?

      • dos equis says:

        @Pandy Plus she’s Armenian, so the Kardashians are probably like her idols, with a mix of Lauren Conrad (Idk why, but I always imagine her delusionally thinking she’s in an episode of The Hills or something).

  9. RA says:

    I always hated Ben Affleck! Jacka**!

  10. Kaianne says:

    Her 15 minutes of fame over soon. With a bit luck she will land in pron movie. or reality TV ‘101 Ways to seduce your boss’ YAWN!

  11. Lennox says:

    I don’t understand people like this, I really don’t. I’m sure she’s enjoying the attention now, but what does she expect to happen long-term? Once all the furore dies down, won’t she only ever be known as the nanny that Affleck cheated with? Maybe I’m thinking too practically, but if she were to ever apply for a proper job, the first thing employers will do is Google her and find out that she’s a thirsty homewrecker. Are her parents proud?

    • Starrywonder says:

      She’s hoping for some interviews and money. Honestly Ben Affleck is smart he’s denying it and k don’t think she has proof otherwise this dumb broad would be instagramming texts and photos. I still say something happened and she thougt tuw wuv. He was like eh no.

      Now she’s hoping for him to pop up and be with her. I think k she set up that pap walk with him since nothing was going on that I could see.

      • Andrea S. says:

        I don’t know about her Instagraming texts, etc cause according to E! Online she’s been suspiciously MIA on social media ever since the story went public. She ONLY came back online when she got the car. That kinda tells me she & Affleck were busy during that time working out the details of the hush money settlement.

    • WindowChair5 says:

      Bang on the money Lennox. Took the words right out of my mouth.

    • jinni says:

      She maybe shopping around a big interview wherein she tells everything and gives all the photos and texts for a really large pay out, but has yet been able to find a show that’s given her the right offer. Maybe all of these pap walks are to show potential interviewers just how much the public wants her side of things in order to increase their offers for a sit down. Or maybe she wants Ben to give her more money in order to go away; more than he is willing to give so far. But I think for that to happen she’s going to have to release something that effects his career and ruins his deal with Warner Bros to direct all of those movies.

      • Bridget says:

        Does anyone really care about her side though? All she’ll do is confirm that a guy everyone already assumed was cheating. She herself is kind of unwatchable. Just me?

      • Jayna says:

        @Bridget, I agree by this point. If she had come out with an interview the first week, people would have been interested. At this point, so much has been dumped out there ad nauseum, regurgitated over and over in other articles, and I don’t think she has a ton of other stuff like texts and emails or anything that are hugely incriminating to share.

        The shock of the divorce and revelation of nannygate while they were separating is over and it’s been overkill with now we’re down to a Sears papwalk. And she’s not likable. Her thirst is very real. So she would not make for a huge draw of an interview anymore because no one has sympathy for her. It’s like that unlikable Rachel Uchitel character. She was so full of herself and thought she was going to be some reality star and people couldn’t stand her by then and she faded away.

      • captain says:

        @Bridget I do. I really want to understand HOW on earth does Ben Affleck get all these women. I want her to tell her story, and in as much detail as possible. Perhaps it’s hypnosis, or NLP, or I don’t know, but it’s just unexplicable.

      • jinni says:

        @Bridget: The only people probably over this story are the ones that go to multiple gossip sites/gossip sources. Most people that fans of them are like that, so this is very much still interesting to them. Plus, if she has something like a text saying he can’t stand being a father and regrets doing the whole family thing. Or how if he could get away with it he leave his family, but he knows it would ruin his rep. You know, something like that. It could be really damaging. Plus, I think she is trying to stretch out he time in the spotlight by putting out what she has bit by bit for maximum attention.

      • K says:

        I think people care about her side because she was living with Affleck, Garner and the kids when their marriage went into full out meltdown. So she has that angle as well as the affair one. But here’s what I don’t get: these people are super famous. Surely they have lawyers who craft nondisclosure agreements from solid titanium? I don’t believe they would only cover the actual period of employment, I’d imagine they would cover all aspects of the relationship she has with them or the kids, in perpetuity. No?

    • Dez says:

      All Ben has to do is get seen out with some other chick and the paps will forget about her.

      • Andrea S. says:

        @Dez he should totally do that! Pick any random he wants. Hell, go back to Vegas & snatch one right up!

      • Jayna says:

        Ben will start dating an actress, someone to start attending events with, and gossip mags will be into the new celebrity couple. No one will care about Basic Bunny Boiler Nanny. The press will be into the new Ben……., whatever the new name for the couple is. Please don’t let it be another Jennifer, Bennifer 3.0. New name, please, Ben.

    • Wren says:

      There’s A LOT of people in the world who aren’t that bright. Many, many one-step thinkers who don’t either have the mental capacity or the inclination to think about how their actions will affect them and others down the line. It always blows me away, but I’ve met these people time and again. Like Mr. Wren’s mom who initiated a messy, ugly, dragged out divorce with his dad and now is genuinely puzzled as to why that side of the family doesn’t like her and won’t speak to her. Um, duh? WTF did you think would happen?!

      They get bitten in the ass all the time by their own stupidity and lack of foresight, and all they do is stare wide-eyed and puzzled, saying, “I can’t believe this happened!?” Well, if you’d thought about it for five seconds and extrapolated on the most likely outcome of your actions, you could have seen this coming. But that’s a foreign concept.

    • DIANE says:

      I doubt that she’s interested in a proper job. She’d love a reality show highlighting her trials and tribulations as the misunderstood nanny who ‘fell in love.’ Real Nannies of Beverly Hills. They could air it right after Kelly Rutherford’s movie of the week. Her brazenness and manipulative abilities are a thing to behold and if it weren’t for the poor kids, who were apparently used by the nanny to get to their father, and for JG, I’d be laughing like hell because he so deserves this.

    • MinnFinn says:

      She was living at home with mummy after getting fired and b4 she moved into to the BH hotel. If she were my 28 yr old daughter, I would kick her out of my home.

    • laura in LA says:

      People like her don’t think longterm; histrionic fame-whores just want money and attention NOW. (Or else!)

  12. funcakes says:

    So therefore this was more than a drive by for Ben. He must be dating this person on a regular basis.
    Oh Ben! You are a Riddle wrapped in paradox wrapped in a enigma.

  13. Annabelle says:

    Her parents must be so proud of their fame whoring daughter.

    • funcakes says:

      She be living with in a year when the money runs out .

    • laura in LA says:

      We were talking about this yesterday, whether Ben’s continuing to fund her, or if she got a six-figure “severance” (ie. hush money)?

      If it’s the latter, which I think it is, she’ll have spent it all in a year’s time when Karma hopefully sends her crash-landing at her parents’ house again.

  14. jinni says:

    I wish she’d just drop all the smut she has on him in one fell swoop and finish him. But it seems she is letting the gossip trickle out slowly and enjoying every minute of it. Ben needs to do another pap friendly image saving family photo op, so she can drop more pictures because I am sure there is more.

    • Starrywonder says:

      There’s no new info though. Just same old stuff and her buying flashy stuff that I am seeing was money that Affleck paid for since she got fired and his dumb butt felt bad. She has no game at all.

      • NGBoston says:

        I agree w/ StarryWonder here. Don’t think she has anything on him. We could all be surprised but even Ben could not be that dumb.

      • laura in LA says:

        Yep, if she really had anything, she’d have already leaked it. Maybe Ben’s people think she’s holding an incriminating photo of him in Vegas, but it seems to me her hand has already been played.

        At this point, she’s just teasing this out in the tabloids for as long as she can to maximize her 15 mins of fame.

    • Neah23 says:

      Be sure there will be another happy family photo on the way.

      • Neah23 says:

        @ Starrywonder

        Well we got that new photo of her on the plane. I think she going to drag this out for as long as she can and if the tabs loose interest she will drop something big.

  15. nina says:

    Maybe she has a tape of them doing coke together or something like that, i could totally see that

    • Starrywonder says:

      @Nehia yeah I think she’s pretending to hold back something big. I still say Ben was stupid and let her see or she found out he was doing drugs or something. Just having an affair wouldn’t be enough. I mean he’s throwing down now on her being a close friend and confidant and that’s it which makes me believe he treatedan employee like a friend and dummy didn’t realize he should have kept his stuff tight. Plus Ben’s people are saying g there were other people on the plane who were trying on the rings, posing etc so I’m now thinking if she got fired was she doing what she could for money? Especially because she did set Ben up for that pap walk.

    • dos equis says:

      @Nina I could see this. She looked coked out to me in that plane pic with Brady’s super bowl rings. I would not be surprised.

  16. Maude says:

    Small thing, but it is Henri Bendel.

  17. kri says:

    The smugness of her face.,.the artful manipulation of the paps and media. This one is running the game. All the other toys better take notes and sign up for her Sidedish Seminars. I hate myself for saying this…but in away (a small way) I find myself almost admiring the way she is sticking it to that stupid,selfish,greedy ba$tard and his dreadful weave. I don’t know you guys..she may just get something out of this besides a car. girlfriend has the instincts of Taylor Swift as far as managing paps/social media.

  18. Katie says:

    Countdown to implosion…

  19. Nicolette says:

    A police escort? Who the hell is she, royalty? She wants the attention from the paps so she should deal with the feeding frenzy when the sharks come circling. They are merely showing up because SHE is putting herself out there on display. Can’t stand the heat? Then get out of the kitchen sweetheart.

    • Sullivan says:

      A police escort to SEARS. The nanny gives hilarious gossip.

    • Kiddo says:

      @Nicolette,This is our ridiculous culture, though. OOH, she had famous peen, give her attention! Like peen anoints you to some higher special status. I wonder if we’d be seeing photos of some random dude if he slept with Jen Garner?

      @Sullivan, that’s hilarious.

      Also, I know it’s redundant, but those skinny jeans or jeggings suck, and look awful.

    • MinnFinn says:

      I’m hoping they are off-duty police she paid for out of Ben’s pocket.

    • NGBoston says:

      @Nicollette- IKR?? A Police Escort to Sears or Costco at the taxpayers expense. Must need some more fugly socks.

      If I lived in LA, I would be firing off complaint emails to Police Chief but they deal with so much of this bc of the proximity with the Stars and Studio bigwigs— doubt it would matter at all. Afterall, they would say these people are residents of our Counties as well and we need to ensure public safety for all.

      Yes, Utichel Part Two needs to
      go away but she won’t.

      • laura in LA says:

        These cops have got to be off-duty and privately paid for because even celebs and the wealthy here would be outraged by this special treatment.

        And the traffic it causes? Don’t even get me started!

    • DIANE says:

      She LOVES the heat. That’s the point. And what better way to get ALL the photographers on her tail than a police escort?

    • Triple Cardinal says:

      Those police officers were probably off-duty. Which means they were rented.

  20. ldub says:

    this b*tch is DESERT THIRSTY

  21. Betti says:

    She has the thirst of a Kardashian – in fact she has a look of Kim (pre all the sugeries).

    Am not sure she has anything shocking as if she did she would have done an exclusive by now. If she had anything shocking she’d have been on the front pages by now. The fact that she isn’t means she ain’t got that much on him but is fronting like she has as she wants to be famous and is after hush money from him.

  22. MrsB says:

    Is that really the best outfit she could come up with? It’s horrendous.

    • Liberty says:

      This is like that Seinfeld episode where Jerry gets freaked out because the girl he is dating wears the same dress on every date and also in the photos he sees in her home.

  23. Joni says:

    She knows about his (alleged) heroin addition and he’s scared she’ll blab.

    • NGBoston says:

      @Joni– Can’t state this for a fact but I call BS on the Alleged Heroin habit. That is not an easy thing to hide and IMO Garner would not have allowed that at all, ever. She is/was well aware of both Afflecks Alcohol and Gambling addictions and not saying he has not dabbled in the typical Hollywood Recreational Drug use… but again– just not buying the H thing.

      Afflecks biggest stumbling block has always been alcohol. Gambling. Always. And of course keeping it in his pants.

      • laura in LA says:

        NGBoston, I agree that it doesn’t look like heroin, but I do think he has the look of someone addicted to painkillers/sleeping pills.

        It’s also possible that he was using steroids/HGH to bulk up for Batman, not uncommon for an actor of his age, so maybe someone saw him injecting and assumed otherwise?

      • lisa2 says:

        Lainey wrote that blind implying Heroin; then hasn’t come back to say anything else about it. I think her doing that was irresponsible and gross

  24. This piece is wearing a jacket–in August–in LA!

  25. Jaze says:

    Ugh, look at her, she can’t even hide how fking happy she is about this whole situation, in every goddamn photo I’ve seen.

  26. MrsBPitt says:

    I’m still not convinced Ben is paying for all these things…she has probably hinted to the tabs that she has more “evidence” of an affair, and they are all courting her (paying her for shit) so that she will give them the exclusive. Believe me, this one is slick, and knows how to use these paps….UGH…I wish she would go away!

    • Christin says:

      I don’t buy it, either. She better have more ‘goods’ to show, because the public will tire of her games soon.

    • Luca76 says:

      I doubt that. At this point she has a 20 grand hotel bill , a 30 to 40 grand car, another rented home and no interview.
      Tabloids don’t pay half of that for tell all stories for instance Michelle Mgee got 20,000 for her tell all on Jessie James with texts etc.
      B and C list celebrities don’t get that much for baby or wedding photos. They aren’t going to pay close to 6 figures for pictures of a nobody and silly quotes from her friends. I’m convinced she’s got something over his head.

    • I Choose Me says:

      This is what I think too. Girl knows her hustle and how to play the media. She’s going to milk this for as long as she can. Trust.

    • MinnFinn says:

      I’m beginning to think she got a lump sum — perhaps G-A paid her salary through Dec 31 in a lump sum. If she got a lump sum for whatever reason it was not big money because her splurges are relatively modest. Lots of people spend $43k on a car or lease one of similar value. And a retail price $600 navy purse from Bendel does not scream million dollar payout to me.

    • Zwella Ingrid says:

      I doubt she can maintain any interest in her story past this weekend without coming up with something new. Also, if it turns out she is paying for the hotel stay herself, surely it won’t continue another week. If the tabs are paying, surely no return would be worth the expense to continue without something new to reveal. My feeling is that if it continues into next week without any earth shattering reveal, then Ben must really being paying for her stay there.

  27. Joni says:

    She is pretty, I’ll give her that.

  28. db says:

    I’ve had a change of heart about her. For one thing, she’s running rings around the Afflecks, pr-wise, which is funny in a weird way, considering how much effort went into controlling how the breakup was presented. But I kind of love that this ordinary gal, someone BA thought he could safely hit and quit it, refuses to kept a secret. LOL

  29. Christin says:

    Once again, that is NOT a brand new, 40 grand car. The 2014 and 2015 Lexus models have a distinctive, almost hourglass grille. That car is a 2010-13 model, and would retail around 30 grand.

    I think she’s showboating with her used car, bracelet, rings photo, etc., to see if anyone will pay up for her to go away. I’m doubting she has anything truly significant or she’d already be making the rounds.

    • Lisa says:

      Yep, I noticed that too. The car is an older model. Hardly worth showboating over. Though still wouldn’t mind a convertible myself …

      • Christin says:

        It is a nice car and a convertible would be fun. Just amazes me that media assumed it was ‘brand new’, which sort of implies it was a gift or cost much more.

      • laura in LA says:

        Yep, she’s trying to make it seem like Ben’s paying for all this as his pampered and protected mistress. But if he did indeed give her a lump sum, as I think he did to make her go away, that money’s going to run out soon enough the way she’s spending and showboating.

        She seems to be taunting him with this and teasing the tabloids by leaking silly-nothing photos. Based on what we’ve seen so far, I’d be willing to bet she’s got nothing.

        If she doesn’t come up with goods, public attention span won’t last. Soon, summer will be over, Ben and Jen will move on in the careers and lives, and what about the nanny-ho? People are already tired of her, and no one will care.

    • I Choose Me says:

      Ding, ding, ding. So far what have we seen? Grainy images of her delivering champagne to Ben but no touching, no kissing. Pics of her in a bikini at a hotel that she insists is paid for on his dime. And pics of her on a plane (where other people were) wearing Brady’s super bowl rings. Where are the real receipts? People love a scandal and she’s throwing out crumbs knowing our minds will fill in the rest.

      • Christin says:

        Well said. Admittedly, my mind started filling in blanks, but now I think she’s teasing.

        And since I’ve been convinced she reads every word about her, I will wave to her and suggest she get the show on the road if she really does have a big reveal.

      • laura in LA says:

        Pretty well summed up, I Choose Me…

        (And I’m waving now, too, Hi Christine!)

    • Merritt says:

      The media is assuming that most people attracted to gossip stories, don’t know anything about cars or how to Google the model years.

      • Christin says:

        I’m not sure why this post isn’t updated to omit the ‘brand new’ and ‘retails up to $43,000’.

        A Google image search clearly shows it is not a brand new car (the grille differences are far from subtle). Unless she bought a ‘brand new’ convertible with a 2010-13 front end.

        Who knows about the bracelet being real or not, but the car takes only a few seconds to confirm.

      • laura in LA says:

        Also, the tabs wants to play up this “scandal” as much as they can, too. Otherwise, as CB wrote above, she’s nothing more than a common Hollywood con-artist.

  30. Snowflake says:

    Somebody needs to tell her not to wear skinny jeans, they do not look good on her. Too tight and make her look thick, which I doubt is the look she’s going for

    • Betti says:

      Hahaha yes she looks terrible in these photo’s – chick has no style. Whenever she wears jeans she looks bigger than she is – not a good look.

      She’s pretty in that bland, blend in with the crowd sort of way.

  31. QQ says:

    a Gatorade IV drip wont be enough for this trollop

  32. smcollins says:

    This chick is something else…Wow! I wonder what her & her friends are toasting about in that one lunch pic. Capitalizing on the demise of a marriage and the broken home of the children she “cared” for? She’s disgusting.

    • Dani says:

      To Ben Affleck paying for this meal! Cheers!

    • laura in LA says:

      Well, I’m glad they enjoyed a BOOZY lunch, so at least we know she’s not pregnant. Keep drinking, ladies.

      Oh, and Christine? Please tell your friend that her foundation makeup is so bad, it makes her look cheap, like she put it on in a dimly-lit, low-rent bathroom. Or better yet, maybe it’s time for you to upgrade your “friends”…

      C’mon, fame-ho’s. You know you gotta up your game if you’re going to lunch and get papped in Beverly Hills!

  33. amp122076 says:

    Boy she’s enjoying this.

  34. DodieTn says:

    I was thinking maybe she took photos of him when he had the kids and was drunk, stoned or etc. Showing possibly he was neglectful and unfit. That would be a huge deal. Something happened while kids in his care, and even though she the nanny while she caring for one or two he was with other one. I notice in some pics with oldest they appeared strained especially getting dog crate. He may have been drunk and driving them around. He looks drunk everyday.

  35. Karma says:

    Loathe her. “Smug, thirsty b—ch” is the perfect description,

  36. Ronda says:

    I feel for the kids but damn this is fantastic gossip. she really delivers.

    • boredblond says:

      yup..I’m hoping her twin sister gets in on the act…you know, the paps won’t know which to follow, hehe…or maybe this is her twin, and she’s off with BA, laughing at it all…well, that would make a hell of a story, don’t you think? Maybe designers will realize the pap potential, and start giving her stuff…wouldn’t surprise me at all.

  37. ladyg says:

    YES! Days of Ouzounian installment is up!

    OK, so, I am right there with ya now: What IS the real story!? I mean, I’ve jokingly hypothesized that Garner may be behind this, but could there be a smidge of truth to that? Imagine if Ouzounian DID tell Garner about the trip, and Garner is the one footing the bill for ole Ouzounian! Meanwhile, Ben is all confused, like, “Where IS Ouzzie getting this money from!?!?!” Because think about it — all of our attention is pretty much off Ben and Jen and their kids. We’re all focused on Good Ole Ouzzie, and only Ouzzie. She’s become the story unto herself. And, gotta admit, homegirl is bringing NEW LIFE to the 15-minute game! I mean, we are getting a full on, HILARIOUS soap opera.

    America: Something’s suspect! Ouzounian’s PR game is almost so sloppy it’s brilliant — perhaps the work of a seasoned PR professional…..maybe one that the Afflecks have used, in the past, to convince us that they are the most normally normals ever to normal? (Cocks head and assumes a Dr. Evil-like expression.)

    (Of course I’m kidding…….kinda…lol.)

    • dos equis says:

      LADYG, you are on to something I think! I just don’t believe this thirsty nanny could be slick enough to hide her thirst when first hired, or that Jen would be dumb enough to not know exactly what kind of broad she was dealing with. Her husband’s a regular hoe, but she’s clueless enough to bring the nanny he’s cheating on her with to the Bahamas? I don’t buy it.

      • ladyg says:

        Dos Equis,

        Right!? Something is rotten in the state of Batfleck. I’ll tell you what, though: I am not a fan of Jennifer Garner. Never have been. Too prissy for my liking. But if it turns out that she is the Wizard behind this Ouzzie curtain, I will have to bow down. bow down long; and bow down hard. Because that would be some real-life Emily-Amadna-Thorne-Clarke level intrigue, and that level of badassery cannot go unpraised.

  38. Eleonor says:

    If I must believe someone here I’ll believe the nanny, because she has everything to gain and nothing to loose.

    • Jas says:

      She has everything to gain from lying, combined with desperation for fame, easy money and no scruples, she’s not a credible person. She will do and say whatever will get her what she wants regardless of truth or the impact on others.

  39. Jas says:

    She’s so bland looking that no matter how many photos I see of her, I wouldn’t recognise her without a headline describing her as Bens former children’s nanny. She oozes pschyo, desperation for fame and is so proud of all the attention she’s getting. She thinks we’re impressed with her? Could she possibly be that deluded? Ugh….

  40. Freddy Spaghetti says:

    Oh, Ben. She must have a truckload of dirt on you. I don’t like her, but he’s so, so dumb with his stupid attempts to act like it’s not a big deal a la he was taking her to Vegas to “help out.”

  41. Cindy says:

    I haven’t read the comments yet, but I have a theory. What if christine and Jennifer fell in love and decided to have christine set Ben up by getting video/photographic evidence of something sexual/embarassing that would ruin him and give Jennifer full custody of the kids and lifetime alimony. Garner is paying Christine’s bills at the hotel and when they release the evidence, Jennifer and Christine will get married and drive off into the sunset with the kids (in a mini-van obviously).

    Oh! and Jennifer called the police escorts to protect her true love…

    • ladyg says:

      See, now here is someone who is speaking my language! This saga is ripe for TRUE conspiracy theory gossip. And I like the cut of your jib. See, I’m with ya on the Lifetime plot that Garner is paying the bills; but I never gave thought to a love-triangle angle….

      Of course we’re joking. But this story is just a glutton to spawn some fan fiction.

      My latest observation: Garner and Ouzounian both have crappy street style. Coincidence or conspiracy!?

      • Cindy says:

        But I want it to be true! When they drive off with their bridal gowns still on and ugly sandals, with “Just Married” spray painted on the back of their mini-van……….

      • ladyg says:

        See, it’s all coming together Cindy. Jen has always downplayed her “street wear.” Her PR person knows that people adore a “star” that’s “just like them,” the problem is that garner is above average looking and has an undeniable “fame” shine to her — so they fugged her up with bad shoes and frumpy clothing, to make her more relatable. Now, exhibit 2: Ouzzie. She is undeniably more attractive in that photo on the plane. Ever since she’s hit the scene as paramour, though she’s groomed, she also has a bit of fug something going on in each shot. Are they working with the same PR person!? LOL!!

        We will get to the bottom of this conspiracy! Mwwwwaahahahahahaha!

    • Merritt says:

      I think you watched too many episodes of “My Crazy Ex” on Lifetime.

    • Ronda says:

      I believe this.

    • BlueNailsBetty says:

      Or Oozy has photographic evidence of Ben and a dude. Batfleck will sell tickets, ButtFleck won’t.

      • ladyg says:

        I don’t know if it’s appropriate to laugh at this, and I feel terrible if its not, but omg did I just let out a laugh. It’s just a great play on words.

      • Velvet, Crushed says:

        @BlueNailsBetty I am loving this as well.

  42. Louisa says:

    If she has something big on Ben then she needs to drop it now. This is getting old. Nothing to see here. Done.

  43. Gal says:

    She looks like she’s on her way to a yeast infection in that first picture.

  44. Merritt says:

    She gets more desperate by the day. A police escort? Please no one cares that much about her. For someone spending so much money, she has no style and a boring face. She doesn’t know how to dress for her body type at all. And she is carrying a bag at the same price point that many of us normal women have.

    I remain unconvinced that she has anything big on Ben that hasn’t already been spilled. I think if she has anything else, it is probably more along the lines of the airplane photo.

    • Christin says:

      The handbag, bracelet (real or fake), used car, blow-outs, meals and hotel stay could have all been accomplished with a relatively small amount of upfront cash (assuming the car is a purchase requiring a small down payment, which probably wasn’t even required, especially if she traded vehicles).

      Most any of us could have pulled this off with credit cards.

      She’s banking on innuendo and illusion.

      • Zwella Ingrid says:

        Maybe pull it off temporarily, but the poops going to hit the fan next week! I said it first so give me credit if I’m right! LOL

      • laura in LA says:

        No, I said it first, Zwella Ingrid! Okay, maybe we can go halfsies on this and both get credit for calling it.

  45. Nina says:

    Wow. she continues showboating for doing nothing but banging her married boss whose kids she was supposed to care for. Her name is going in my lexicon — ouzounian: one who milks her 15 seconds without shame, brain, and worst of all(in her mind), fashion sense.

  46. frivolity says:

    This is all such a disgrace and I am a disgrace for wasting my time on it.
    Ugh! What have I become?!?

  47. o_o_odesa says:

    I’m headed to Sears with the baby right now. I need to pick up a new diaper genie. How do I go about getting a police escort?

  48. CidySmiley says:

    I prayed to the gossip gods and they delivered! This girl is gold. She is NOT going away. I wonder what she has on him? Nudes? Pics with other celebs? A video? I can’t wait to find out.

    Here’s my theory: Ben got her to go away, and probably promised her something or something along those lines. And sometime between now and then he made her mad, he probably said some stuff along the lines of “we’ll be together” – or something like that – and then he went back on it. Somehow he made her mad, and now she ain’t going away.

  49. CidySmiley says:

    But also can we talk about the fact that this is THE LAST thing the police should be worried about? Unless her life is in danger, they have no buisness escorting her anywhere.

    • captain says:

      I was thinking about it too. There are certain procedures that police follows, it’s not like you can call them and they pop over to escort you. I mean she’s not the Queen. So if they are escorting her, perhaps she has received some threats? On social network or something.

      • DodieTn says:

        I think she has had threats, you know how the internet is. She is still smug but not quite like she was.

      • here's Wilson says:

        I don’t know how it works in LA, but here in PA where I am a police dispatcher in a large urban area we would not be escorting anyone for no reason. Bank runs with large sums of money and parties retrieving their belongings from a house where there is an active PFA. That’s it. Our department would laugh in this girls face at such a suggestion.

  50. Jayna says:

    There’s nothing likable about her. She’s selling photos and stories about banging a well-liked celebrity’s movie-star husband, a woman that has been a good wife and long-suffering, and she betrayed the children she was taking care of, not just by the affair, but by all of this fame-hoing. It’s nothing to be proud of, that you and a lying husband banged, and leaking the story and running around smiling at the cameras like she’s a star herself and interesting and that she’s worth our attention because she bought a used Lexus off of this. Are we supposed to be impressed? Is she so delusional she thinks anyone will like her and want to see her in a reality show, or whatever she is aiming for?

    She’s average and she is full of herself for no reason.

    • Christin says:

      If one good thing comes of this, it is that she will (hopefully) never be a caregiver for another family again.

      She really is so bland and nondescript that she will quickly be forgotten by the masses. This is going to sound awful, but she has certain facial and body features that suggest she won’t age well. Superficial as she seems, her future isn’t looking too bright.

      If she does turn out to be a GF to BA, all I can say is — Good luck with that!

      • Jayna says:

        I thought the same thing about her not aging well. She was living in the Bahamas after NPH with her fisherman fiance’. I think she’s just getting lot of sun damage on her skin, which will age her.

    • Kitten says:

      She’s incredibly average with Jen Aniston-style (no offense to Jen).
      She’s also incredibly gross and thirsty.

    • Zwella Ingrid says:

      Jayna, I get what you are saying, and yet we are all flocking to the posts every day to see what fresh hell Nanny Oozie has brought forth.

  51. Lanse says:

    A trip to Sears? What…??

  52. Lurker says:

    She and Kelly Rutherford would be excellent BFF. Both are delusional beyond all recognition.

  53. KNOW-IT-ALL says:

    Oh God Ben the con artist has done it again fooling this woman he is taking her seriously now she believes the hype because he is footing the bills.That guy is a lying narcissist I am pretty sure all this is orchestrated by Ben the sick and twisted way of having fun at the expense of Jennifer.If Jen knows what is good for she should run from this man who is in serious gaslighting mode right now.I am not stupid Ben is behind this whole shit a.d he is loving every minute of this charade.End of story

  54. dippit says:

    Said lots on yesterday’s post about why I think there’s more to this than a take at face value basic affair with, surpringly, Ben maybe as being the more honest (*this time*!!!!).

    Anyway, today is less theorising and more rolling eyes. LAPD need side-eyed for pandering to her damsel in distress seeking protection from rabid paps – they’re her paps, she demands and commands this intrusive monster.

    It’s made me think of Chicago. She may not stand accused of murder but she’s obviously got a Billy Flynn type advising her… this is now full on Razzle Dazzle mode. Yet, I’m with lots of others ^^^, without headers around her pics I would still fail to put a name to the face or make a media/celeb connection. She’s that Amber Heard prettyish forgetable; any basic attractiveness she has visually needs to be given a context by someone else (eg Johnny or Ben). That type drop down hard and fast in Hollywood around 30, unless they work themselves to a baby and/or ring before the objects of their focus forget what they look like too.

    This one will be remembering Sear’s pap walking from the bar fly or low rent pay for play position soon enough. Hubs sha*s Nanny is an old well worn story but so is Other Woman’s bubble bursts on skid row.

  55. GingerCrunch says:

    I don’t know if anyone has quoted the great Shirley Manson regarding this situation, but here goes:

    What drives you on
    Can drive you mad
    A million lies to sell yourself
    Is all you ever had

    You stupid girl
    All you had you wasted…

    • laura in LA says:

      I did on a previous thread! Great minds think alike, GingerCrunch…

      Shirley Manson rocks. And that her band is named Garbage seems also apropos in this situation.

      Stupid Girl, indeed.

  56. dippit says:

    She may need to borrow Ben’s hairpiece, those pics show thinning super fresh blow-out or not. That parting shows much scalp.

    Is her age confirmed? Hormones?

  57. captain says:

    That’s just so juicy. She is the gossip personified ))
    Why is she leaving her house with Starbucks coffee? ))) I know why! Because ALL movie stars get papped with a blowout, signature bag AND a coffee. She could have drunk a cup of coffee at home and then went to Sears. It’s not like she was pressed for time and had to take her coffee into her new car. It might spill, and the car is new. I hope it didn’t, Christine.
    I really want it to be a love story that no PR manager can stop. Unstoppable passion. Affleck should really have the guts for it, though I doubt he has. He is so insecure, he can’t go after his heart.

  58. Diane says:

    Lainey talked a few times about how he will self-destruct and then reinvent himself. It’s part of the gambler in him. Do you think this is his way of nodding to his past big fail so he can show all how he rises from the ashes again? Setting up for the big scene? Horrifically, if this is so then it is greatly at the expense of his wife and kids.

    • laura in LA says:

      I don’t think Ben does this on purpose, Diane, but as you know about gambling addicts like him, from what I’ve read in your previous posts, and Lainey knows having been one herself…

      He likes the rush he gets from winning when the chips are down, and I’m sure with all the Batman stuff, everyone knows he’ll be fine when he’s on top again next year.

      So unless the studio pushed back all his other film projects to make him rehab privately this fall, chances are he’ll never actually have to deal with his problems.

  59. captain says:

    Well, I must say that Ms Ouzounian is quite outrageous, but the comments here about her hair, bottom and legs, when she is obviously one extremely pretty girl, are just not on. So you don’t like the girl, lets dissect her body, how feminist.

  60. Iknowwhatboyslike says:

    Did Ben ever explained those pictures of this Nanny pulling up to his house while he waited outside for her, smiling like he was about to get some strange? What was the explanation for that?

    • perplexed says:

      Yeah, he was smiling pretty weird in those photos.

    • captain says:

      He said (I mean the SOURCES, lol) that she supported him, as a friend, when his marriage crumbled, and he was unhappy because his wife was nagging. There was inappropriate closeness, but no affair, he said.

  61. Jayna says:

    Well, it’s almost over if they are covering a Sears visit. That’s pretty bad. LOL No big interview announced yet. So I guess so far she hasn’t received much in the way of a huge offer yet, and it seems like so far Ben hasn’t thrown big hush money at her.

    Christine, your 15 minutes are ticking and they are almost up.

    • Christin says:

      I think the offers are mostly in her head at this point. Striking while the iron is hot is not happening here.

      If she was terminated, Ben and Jen probably have to be very careful about what they say. To reduce litigation risk, employers* are limited to specific facts about the previous employee, such as dates employed.

      *I’m doubting she was with an agency and they directly employed her. And she may file a lawsuit eventually, whether her claims have merit or not.

      • laura in LA says:

        I think even tabloids and TV are side-eyeing this chick now…

        And there’s no way most major media are going to go against the powers-that-be, as in Ben/Jen’s lawyers, agents, reps – and of course, a big studio like WB.

      • Christin says:

        This is random, but it’s times like this when I wish the legendary Dolly (who grew up a couple of mountains away, no pun intended) had a talk show. Maybe she could talk some sense into these two, and give pearls of wisdom (such as the quotes below).

        To Ben — “Smile, it increases your face value.” She also has said you really need to decide your life path once you’re 40.
        To the fame-nanny — “I can spot a phony a mile away.”

        Oh well, Dolly has said she doesn’t like to give advice, because everyone’s journey is different, so my dream won’t happen. But I can just imagine it. (Hopefully Ben wouldn’t wrestle her and talk about her chest like he did that Canadian TV gal several years ago.)

  62. stinky says:

    how long did she even work for them, anyway? does anyone know??

    • dippit says:

      I’ve only heard of her being the Nanny from late Spring/early Summer. Not long.

      Delving deep memory wise, didn’t Enty have a BI, pre-dating that time, about the long suffering actress wife of an A+ discovering something Big and intolerable about her spouse. The implication was the Big thing wasn’t the standard philandering she’d been used to putting up with. Most guesses were Jen and Ben.

      And the ‘separation’ and Ben often camping out at the Bel-Air predate Nanny too.

      The timeline is off for Bahamas too as they’d already prepped for the official split announcement.

      Nanny was late to the party for so much of this so certainly not The Catalyst. Maybe not even a Thing at all.

  63. stinky says:

    im thinking NOTHING happened.
    she got fired, got severance, and she’s WISHING there was a story to sell.
    but there aint.

    • dippit says:

      I’m getting closer to with you on this. Said yesterday, Ben may be being hoisted this time by a fantasist on the make. With his past rep for infidelity she could play the odds that nobody would believe his denials. But some bits are just not adding up on the timeline and the champagne pics didn’t look ‘lovers’.

      After Rachel Dolezal anything is possible.

    • frivolity says:

      This is playing out very confusingly, but I do think SOMETHING happened with Ben. Here’s why:
      The statements from his reps are worded very specifically, so that if he has to admit an affair, you will see that they never exactly really lied. First they said something like, “it is (or this is) garbage.” What is? Too general to define. Easy to say that some of it is garbage – which is true. Then, they got VERY specific. For example, they said Ben had no relationship with the nanny during or after his marriage to Garner – but specifically leaving out their supposed 10-month “separation” phase. Also, all of the B.S. about how you will not find HIS credit card paying for her stay at the hotel – VERY specific. Of course it would not be on HIS card, even if he were ultimately footing the bill. Look at all of Ben’s rep’s quotations and tell me there isn’t enough purposeful wiggle room for him to eventually say that he did have an affair with the nanny but he never really lied about the particulars.

    • jwoolman says:

      He might just not have agreed with her dismissal, which may have had to do only with her performance as a nanny. The offer for her to help in Las Vegas may have been legit – a fun job he thought she could handle and it would add to her severance pay. I don’t know if he is actually paying her hotel bill, but if so that can also be legit if you think in terms of avoiding lawsuits over the dismissal and also if he actually disagreed with the decision. I just didn’t see any steam in the pics we have seen. She is scheming about something, but this may be vengeance against the wife rather than romantic entanglements with the husband. With his rep, it takes no effort to get the tabloids buzzing. Stay tuned, I guess.

  64. pk says:

    If Ben were paying for her to keep quiet, she wouldn’t be flaunting her stay at the Hotel Bel-air, new Lexus, or releasing more photos. More than likely she is getting her money from the magazines and pap photos. This is a big story.
    Because Ben has been awfully quiet on the subject, more than likely something “inappropriate” happened between the two of them, but Ben ended it and the scorned nanny went public.
    She’s humiliating both Ben and Jennifer. They aren’t giving her any money.

  65. nic says:

    I don’t think Ben slept with this woman.

    I think he confided in her, and maybe flirted with her, while working out the divorce/announcement with Jen. Ben didn’t realize the nanny was an attention whoring, fame seeking, bunny boiling nut job, setting him up for photos. Jen may have realized it, and hired the nanny/kept her around for that reason. This has nothing to do with the nanny’s attractiveness, and everything to do with the fact that Jen kept psycho nanny around even though nanny’s behavior was inappropriate. Garner is so desperate to make herself look like a martyr she doesn’t realize when her tabloid sob stories contradict themselves. Garner claims she thought psycho nanny was more interested in Ben then the kids, but kept her around because the kids liked psycho nanny. How does that make any sense? Nannies are fired all the time. It’s not even the family’s job to fire the nanny, the nanny agency does that. Also, nannies are changed as the kids get older, and their needs change. Nannies are constantly suspected of flirting with husbands (much the way that maids are suspected of stealing), and like maids, nannies are a dime a dozen. There isn’t just one available woman that accepts money to look after your kids. With all this in mind, we are supposed to believe that Garner knew her (completely disposable) nanny was checking out her (separated for almost a year) husband rather than caring for the kids, and Garner kept the chick around because the kids liked psycho nanny soooooo much in the 3 months they knew her (really no time at all). Garner’s sob story is insane. It only makes sense to keep psycho nanny around if she hoped Ben would cheat, so Garner could look like a martyr in the divorce. In this case, Garner considers her children’s feelings truly irrelevant to her own need to win.

    As for Ben, after psycho nanny was fired, I think he gave her some money. Partly out of guilt for her being fired. He confided in her, spent social time with her, and blurred the line between employer and employee. Also, maybe he hoped a payout would disincline the girl from repeating anything he said to/in front of her. Unfortunately for Ben, psycho nanny is a psycho. She called the press and is spending the guilt money from Ben on gifts, pretending she has some relationship with him. Ben’s in a tight spot because while he didn’t technically pay for her to stay at the hotel, or buy her a car, he probably did give her money that is (at least in part) financing these expenditures. It makes it difficult for him to deny paying for these things, even though that isn’t exactly what happened. If Ben admits he give psycho nanny guilt money, the world will assume he slept with her/cheated (even though technically, he was separated for 10 months and had announced a divorce before he supposedly slept with this nanny, so sleeping with her would hardly constitute an affair if it had happened).

    I doubt Ben is in contact with psycho nanny. I think the reason he hasn’t sued her or had his pr team go after her (yet) is because he doesn’t want her to repeat whatever he may have confided to her/said in front of her. I’m sure there was an NDA as part of her nanny contract, but clearly there are ways around that. Psycho nanny is willing to suggest she’s being stalked by photogs (uh huh), and that the papparazzi are overhearing phone calls (sure), and that her friends are selling out her private social media pages (right). I really hope Ben doesn’t pay her another cent; I think that’s what she’s angling for.

    As for Garner the martyr, I think she’s going to keep hanging herself from that cross until even her fans are sick of her. I’m surprised that so many women like her, considering that she cheated with Affleck on Daredevil while Affleck was engaged and Garner was married. I find her whole martyrdom routine hypocritical.

    • The Original G says:

      @nic. See Occam’s Razor.

      Unfortunately for Ben, Ben is also a psycho.

    • Christin says:

      So many narratives have been tossed out by both camps, it’s hard to figure out. And I still think all the family pap walks in the weeks prior to the split / nanny stories only fueled interest in what we’re seeing now. But maybe that was the grand scheme?

      All I can predict is a pap stroll with three kids this weekend in Atlanta.

      • Jayna says:

        I think, and hope, that Jennifer won’t do an orchestrated pap walk with Ben and the kids again. She did it once for him. That’s enough. Let him go do it on his own with the kids if he’s trying to do damage control. Don’t participate in it.

    • TheBeautifulNorth says:

      Exactly. Poor, helpless, unfortunate, family man extraordinaire Ben. He is the true victim here. And who, by no fault of his own, is now trapped in a tight spot, suffering the demons of guilt because of a psycho, attention whoring, fame seeking, bunny boiling nut job nanny but most of all because of the desperate, cross hanging, hypocritical, sobinducing, child abusing martyr Jennifer Garner. FFS.

      • Alice says:

        ^^^^^^ Yes, m’am!!!

      • nic says:

        @ thebeautifulnorth

        So you deny that psycho nanny is a fame whoring nut job?

        And you’ve spent the past decade oblivious to the fact that Garner the martyr has enjoyed wallowing in her own victimhood as much as Garner’s fan girls enjoy buying said victimhood.

        I especially love how you seem to suggest that any bad behavior on Affleck’s part makes it impossible that any one else involved could possibly be a jerk. Because, as we know, there’s only ever one jerk in any situation. Yep, only one, never more than one.

        If the papparazzi pose a threat to children, then dragging your children past an army of papparazzi to the farmer’s market to bolster your “perfect wife and mother” image would be child abuse. Then again, it would be child abuse to use your children as accessories to bolster your image, papparazzi or no.

        Furthermore, expecting people to pity you for your husband’s alleged infidelity, when your relationship to said husband began with you cheating on your previous husband, is the epitome of hypocrisy.

        As for the bunny boiling nanny, her crazy speaks for itself, and if you chose not to see it, I pity you.

    • Kim says:

      That sums it up quite nicely, I think. nic had it right the first time. My comment is on the wrong thread.

  66. KNOW-IT-ALL says:

    Ben is giving the nanny money if not so Jennifer Garne would not be so tense why will the paps give her so much money for such little information this is all Ben s doing like his whole marriage deny even when it is true if he cared so much why did he let her take pictures on the plane ride also why come out of his house to be seen with her do not tell me he is niave not buying it so this nanny somehow is smarter than him a celebrity for over ten years yeah right.what sense does that make.He did this stunt purposely with JLo now he is doing same with Jennifer Garner.He could not careless because he knows he can always bounce back n if things get bad he can count on Jennifer Garner to arrange things for him like she always does.This is all Ben’s doing.

    • captain says:

      I don’t know, seems an expensive way to go about it. He could have done it without 20 K stay at the hotel or a Lexus. Undeniable photos plus the girl telling her story would have done the trick, I think..

  67. Paro7 says:

    This woman makes me sick.

  68. The Original G says:

    What an amateur. He’s going to have to do better than a stripped down entry level Lexus and designer handbag.

    Back to the “How to Shut Down a Crazy Ho” workshop, stat…..

  69. Tacos and TV says:

    The girls is wearing a cartier love bracelet… that’s more expensive than her purse and probably entire outfit in these pics.

  70. MissyD says:

    I can’t wait for all the other side pieces to come out demanding their cars, hotel stays, and bags!!! C’mon! What are you waiting for? Surely all the other mistresses are fuming that they’re missing out on this action.

  71. Ana says:

    Real quick since i am at work : 😄

    The 10 month separation came from Ben’s camp, right. This is when he started filming Batman in Detroit. There was rumour, he started hanging out with a sexy young thing and it carried on till the filming of The Accountant in ATL. Not sure who it was, but a civilian according to some tweets. Now if you go back to some tweets, some people are also alluding that this nannygate is not a recent hook up. She showed up in April when Ben is all done with filming. If I am to believe all these tweet stories the time line would work. Another thing, these 2 are still on communication. Even Lainey has mentioned it today. But nanny became most hated person now so whatever Ben promised her would not work for his image.

    We still have to solve the mystery woman in Nova Scotia.

    I hope this nanny ho will drop something big on Affleck’s bday this weekend. 😝

    • Diane says:

      Another trail! So, maybe his denials of a fling with Nanny are really directed to this other person (who was to come out later). Maybe he’s trying to tell her he didn’t cheat on her with Nanny McNightmare?

    • captain says:

      So are you saying, he hired her as a nanny to keep her close by, but she was his girlfriend all along? That’s just evil. What do you say to a young beautiful girl to get her to put herself in this position, where she has to lie and sneak and humiliate herself everyday?
      On the other hand, if they were really separated for 10 months ( which I doubt), why would he need the masquerade? That’d only makes sense if Garner had no idea they are separated.

      • Ana says:

        @ captain
        Ben’s PR is a mess. They released different time lines that they confused themselves as well. Remember the two big events when Affleck didn’t wear his ring but they were not given enough traction? The events were the Save The Children gala and the Hollywood Press awards Show. We all thought his ring was being cleaned. But JG was never without her ring but only resorted to wearing the simple band. Before she would wear some fancy wedding rings together with the band but since late last year even when she was promoting her movie, she only had the simple band on. They could have been separated already since that time. But then, on Tumblr, there was an event planner who blogged on her page that she was hired for the 10th wedding anniversary party by the Afflecks but canceled right before the anniversary. This was when they announced their separation. The event planner was from SFO. Confusing right?

      • KNOW-IT-ALL says:

        Have you heard of fallback girl.He is keeping Jennifer Garner in the picture in case where he is headed to fails he is scared of the woman he wants to get back with.

    • DodieTn says:

      I think he met nanny when she worked for NPH. I think they met on Gone Girl set when she brought the kids to see Neil. I am curious why she left that employment and was there a gap.

      • Jayna says:

        I don’t know why she left and if she had a job right after. But sometime after working for NPH and David, she moved to the Bahamas because she was engaged to a fisherman.

        I don’t know if he ever met her with NPH. I doubt it. He had a smaller role. He was probably on set for like three weeks. I don’t know how that works.. He and his family live in NYC . No part of the movie was filmed in NYC. It was Missouri and California.

        But he probably wasn’t off on location that long compared to the Pike and Affleck, etc.,, and so they possible never had to fly to see him. I would imagine he would fly back to NYC to see them. He had so many things going on in his career at that time. I remember in an interview he talked about how he was squeezing everything in. Wasn’t he working on or preparing for his Broadway play also?

      • Christin says:

        Did anyone ever see any photos of her working for NPH? I found images of three different women with the twins. None look like this chick.

        Would love to know her work history (truth, not fantasy). My guess is multiple jobs for very short durations, with big gaps in between.

        She could have had a very brief stint with NPH and stopped by GG set without the kids. Could have had some time off and been flying to see mummy or something.

    • platypus says:

      Seems like Ben doesn’t give a sh*t about his image, though. He just went along with whatever Jennifer said. He put out that BS statement about how crappy his wife is, he’s been showing up to events looking high as f*ck, doesn’t care to hide his drunking and gambling, or about what the nanny says or does after he most likely handed her a bunch of money… So I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s still in contact with her regardless of what it would do to his image.

  72. OTHER RENEE says:

    It infuriates me to think that my hard earned tax dollars are being used to “protect” this bimbo of the moment.

  73. Tw says:

    Take a seat.

  74. Jayna says:

    I see a boob job as her next purchase. A couple of George’s girls got a boob job, for whatever reason, just before they were booted. She’s getting reading for her sexy cover shots of magazines and spreads that she thinks will all want her because she’s a chill girl, fun, and so interesting. She’s not like Jennifer, y’all.

    • laura in LA says:

      She’d better get it fast. The clock’s ticking on her 15 mins, and with the way she’s spending her $100k “severance” (that’s my guess on the amount), the money’s going to run out, too…

      Then she’ll just be your average, already-forgotten fame-ho, just a footnote to this whole disastrous divorce mess. Can’t happen soon enough for all of us!

    • Christin says:

      She would probably get that done right now, if it would not interfere with her pap stroll schedule.

      The more I think about this (and like several posters, I am both curious and appalled by this mess), I doubt she has anything truly shocking — for him. Media are collecting page hits while they can. Maybe she (or rather, her ‘sources’) made a few bucks on the grainy photos and the pool pics. Like Laura said, she may realize she could easily get in over her head if she directly sells a story.

      Will be interesting to see what Ben does for his birthday. My suggestion is for him to be photographed in a child size party hat with Samuel smearing cake all over his face.

  75. OTHER RENEE says:

    Let’s not forget that JLo may still be a shadow figure in his life.

  76. rudy says:

    Ben is lying. He IS paying for the nanny, but hiding the bills on a friends’ credit card.

    • laura in LA says:

      Sorry to bust your theory here, rudy…

      But given that we’ve already seen and heard enough from “friends” and “sources” of the nanny in the tabloids, which are already as sick of her as we are, it wouldn’t surprise me at all if “they” are now resorting to plants like this in one of the lowest and least verifiable places – blindgossip.

      (Hey, Christine, let’s go, time’s a wastin’! Better play your hand before the weekend…)

  77. Frosty says:

    Shoot. That old Lexus? Bet it’s leased. What I don’t quite see with the nanny’s story is Ben had to have been working most of the time, so he wasn’t around, especially if it’s true he and Jennifer were separated 10 months? Yet the Nanny was supposedly Ben’s hire? While I wouldn’t put it past him to fool around with the nanny while his marriage failed, the story just doesn’t hang together. If she didn’t have something on him or them, why subsidize her now?

    • laura in LA says:

      Christin already verified that it’s probably a 2013, so my guess is a CPO, bought with her nanny payout, I suppose, to show Ben what he’s “missing”…

      Isn’t she fun? Look at her lunching and laughing with “friends”. She’s the Cool Girl, of course, so unlike Jen! Not a care in the world because she has no job anymore. This girl’s on “on fire”!

      She’s so important to Ben (and presumably our nation’s security) that she’s getting papped daily and needing police escorts to…


      • aga says:

        Yes, because Ben’s camp is more reliable ;), maybe is time to notice that we have 3 camps who are only lying depending on the development of this story. If you maybe like Ben a bit you should allow to die this history, you don’t help him by discrediting and criticizing this completely irrelevant nanny.

      • laura in LA says:

        Oh hey Christine

  78. Barbara says:

    She must have called the police that she was being threatened. I would make her prove it.

  79. jccw says:

    People magazine now saying he’s off to Atlanta to see the kids, and to get away from the “circus”. I don’t know, half the media sites say they’re still together, the other half say not. I think if he broke it off with JLo back in the day because of the attention, this is 100xs worse, so it would make no sense if they were still dating. If he keeps the hooch around for God knows what reason, those poor children will need extensive therapy. Also, I see the “wedding ring” from the plane is off on the latest picks. Yup…she’s a keeper!

  80. cruiz2 says:

    This girl is a goofy, young, fame whore. No way would BA want to end up in a real relationship with her. Maybe she seduced him? Caught him in a drunken, vulnerable moment? Maybe it’s a PR scam? It’s all SO fishy!!!

    • platypus says:

      I’m actually not so sure Ben has as many good options as one would think. He’s lost his good looks and charm, and turned into a low-life, cheating, gambling, addict. She’s very pretty, and probably likeable enough (to him) considering how long he kept her around, taking her for trips, and having her watch his kids… I think he fell for her, and they had a legit affair.

    • Christin says:

      Very fishy. I don’t think any of the three parties has been 100 percent truthful. Varying timelines and narratives galore.

  81. Jazz says:

    The top half of the outfit – hair, sunglasses and blazer sort of looks ok, but the bottom half – no, just no!

  82. Herzog says:

    She f##ked Ben and Tom in the Vegas Trip and has Proof. Thats why they spoil her and Giseles marriage is over too. Sorry but I love this story 😮

  83. Dan says:

    What a manipulative little b(female dog)! My blood would be boiling if I were Jennifer Garner since she had let this woman into her home, care for her children and now she seems to be simply slapping Jennifer in the face by all of this crap that she’s doing. Driving around in a brand new expensive car and flaunting all of this designer crap that she undoubtedly did NOT have before and it seems as though she is tipping off the paps just to extend her 15 minutes of fame as long as possible. Hopefully someone the she’s close to will be able to talk some sense into her and get her to end this ridiculousness…