Elizabeth Olsen is still with Tom Hiddleston & does she look knocked up? Ha.


Here are some photos of Elizabeth Olsen at Stella McCartney’s LA show last night. I thought we should devote a post to Olsen, not because her Stella look was so tragic or bad (it wasn’t), but because of the RUMORS. Dragonfly rumors. You see, Elizabeth was back in LA for this event… after she flew to Hawaii to spend time with Tom Hiddleston. Tom was in Pasadena last Friday, so it’s even possible that they flew into LA together and they just kept it really, really quiet. We know Olsen and Hiddles were together because the director of Kong: Skull Island posted photos of Hiddles, Olsen and Brie Larson together. He quickly took the photo down because he was inundated with comments/craziness from the Dragonflies. People screencapped it though:


So, Olsen flew out to the Kong set to visit Hiddles? Was this after he dumped her? Or did the breakup never happen? These two are playing a hell of a lot of games for two people who are just casual friends. At this point, I guess I’ll believe that they’ve been together the whole time, that they started up around the time Elizabeth Olsen dumped her fiance over the phone, through all of last year, through TIFF, through Olsen denying their coupledom, and now into the new year. That’s what it looks like.

One last word about Olsen’s Stella McCartney look though… does she look pregnant to anyone else or is it just an unflattering dress? *drops bomb, walks away*



Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

345 Responses to “Elizabeth Olsen is still with Tom Hiddleston & does she look knocked up? Ha.”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. V4Real says:

    I think they look cute together. I actually like them together; sorry dragonflies.

  2. Elle says:

    She really does have a pregnancy glow/fullness going on..looks like I did in the very early stages..

  3. Zapp Brannigan says:

    Yet another victim of bad Stella designs, I am going to raise a glass in memory of good fashion.

  4. Luca76 says:

    It’d be amusing to see the meltdown from the Dragonflies if she were pregnant. Almost as fun as seeing the meltdown from the Twihards if Rob Pattinson marries and/or impregnates FKA.
    But she loves the oversized gowns so probably not.

  5. snusnu says:

    Her ex Boyd Holbrook is one of the strongest celeb crushes I have had in my life.Good lord that man is YUMMY.

  6. LadyMTL says:

    Oh Kaiser, what a firestorm you might have started right there, lolololol. :D
    FWIW I don’t think she looks pregnant, rather I think it’s that god-awful fabric that’s making her look really wide in the middle / across the torso.

    *Sits back with some hot chocolate and waits for the Tumblr meltdowns*

  7. Kate says:

    I hope so, the freak-outs on Tumblr would be something to see…

  8. Kiki says:

    These Hollywood couples tht are together or not moments are really getting on my nerves. And I have had enough. This is just people claiming for fame and publicity. And it me if I am wrong

    • spidey says:

      Or scandal rags, websites, trying to make something out of nothing?

      • Cranberry says:

        Yup spidey, I’m with you. I’m not even sure that’s EO in this pic. I know it kinda looks like her, but still could be that other girl. I know she MAY not have been in Hawaii when this pic was taken, but there’s still too much speculation and shaky facts. But even if it is EO, I don’t blame them for hiding their relationship or fwb. I don’t see them getting any advantage, professional or personal, from publicity of their supposed coupling. The only ones I’ve seen benefiting from the rumors are rags and websites.

    • Mary-Alic says:

      I find tneir behaviour insulting to any intelligent fan. Especially considering her attempt to mutter something like a denial at TIFF, which I and others here rightfully defined as a non denial, actually. But overall, date and own it, ffs. So childish.

  9. astrid says:

    We are discussing celebrities after all. I can’t imagine that any celebrity would wear a tent on purpose unless it was to hide a pregnancy or start pregnancy rumors.

  10. Yana says:

    I don’t think she’s pregnant. She’s just apple shaped and that dress is unflattering to her shape.

  11. Kiki says:

    And if you asked me.. Tom Hiddlestone and Elizabeth Olsen do make a very cute couple.

  12. Freebunny says:

    Their little game is childish, I guess they deserve each other.
    Good luck.

  13. OhDear says:

    I’m just going to sit in this corner and wait for snacks.

  14. Dani says:

    He’d be plucking that page right out of Cumby’s book if she were pregnant, except the meltdown would be even crazier with this one. *fingers crossed* I don’t have much going on in my life right now and this sounds exciting.

  15. Miss M says:

    She looks more relaxed, but I don’t see the pregnancy glow. She looks slimmer than she was when promoting avengers. But if they are together and she is pregnant, it willl be a cute baby!

  16. Green Is Good says:

    Oh, Kaiser. How evil you àre to the Dragonflies. You know how fragile they are!

    ( is that agonized wailing I hear?!)

  17. NUTBALLS says:

    She not knocked up, just making another fugly sartorial choice.

    I’m with Kaiser on this. I think these two started an onset affair and have continued hooking up since then. The million dollar question is whether it will continue after ISTL releases.

    I have to say that after her publicist leaked the hookup rumor, their pap walks and their dodgy TIFF responses to the dating question, JVR’s oopsie (?) picture was pure gold.

    Looking forward to seeing how this thing plays out in the coming months.

    • Becky says:

      @Nutballs I agree about the hooking up but not the timing. There were brief sightings of her in London last Feb and Tom was in London until filming The Night Mgr abroad in May, if she’d been around I’ve no doubt there would have been more sightings. As soon as she turned up in July someone got a pic. Looks like they’ve been hooking up every month or so (incl promo) since then when his schedule allows.

      • Nutballs says:

        I think it makes a lot more sense that they started hooking up on set, after she had broken her engagement and they were working closely together.

        But, believe what you will. Since he was busy filming TNM for 4 months and they live an ocean apart, I wouldn’t expect there to be a ton of sightings of them together.

      • Mary-Alic says:

        No one takes photos of him in London or very very few. He goes for months without a photo being posted. It’s something about how we live in Europe, I don’t know. The celebrity obssession in North America, which I witness npw first hand, is non existing in Europe. And the photo with Olsen in London happened only after months of reported sightings and Tumblr teasing “no, you didn’t see them, prove it!”. That was the only reason why even this one (almost two) photo was taken.

        Of course, they hooked up during ISTL. And they declared it openly in July. The rest is childish if not stupid but it’s amusing to witness the denial of some! LOL

      • Cranberry says:

        @Mary-Alic Umm, they did not declare any relationship or hook up in July. They both denied it in fact, and that can be verified by many sources. Whether you believe they’re lying or not is another thing.
        There’s a few other pics of TH around London, not a much as a super famous celeb or a celeb that lives in LA. Someone took pics of him on the tube, also on the street alone after a movie, and in a restaurant after coriolanus. He’s not in London a whole lot anyway cause he’s off filming or promoting at film festivals.

      • Becky says:

        Months of reported sightings, you mean before July? There were posts on a couple of tumblr blogs that she was seen in his neighbourhood for about a week in Feb last year but no pics. He was seen regularly alone after that eg that pic of him on the Tube in Feb. As my post above I think they hooked up but nothing else happened til the summer (that 1st US Weekly article was dropping a hint).

      • lilacflowers says:

        @Becky, Rodney Crowell was also in London at the same time in February last year. They were working on finishing the soundtrack recording for ISTL.

      • Becky says:

        @Lilacflowers I know she was in London the same time as Rodney Crowell, but she was also seen in her off time hanging in Tom’s neighbourhood.

    • erica says:

      She’s not pregnant. It’s just another one of her weird, ugly outfits. Sorry all I can see when I look at her is Mary Kate and Ashley.

  18. mj says:

    Sigh, every time there’s a non body con dress, start up the pregnancy rumors.

  19. Renee says:

    I so look forward to the Hiddleston and Olsen posts. I know almost nothing about either of them except what I’ve read here but the comments on their posts are usually pure comic gold.

  20. InvaderTak says:

    Oh our dear Kaiser, you win the teaser troll of the day award lol

  21. Just here says:

    I’d laugh pretty hard if Hiddles goes the same way as Cumberbatch. These two are totally together; they’ve been playing people for ages. Just walk the carpet already, geez.

  22. Farhi says:

    I like Lizzy, I think she is a good actress. I don’t get all the fuss over Hiddles. He is not God’s gift to women. To me he is Eddie #2.
    As for the private life I don’t think they are a good match. But if it works for them, I wish them all the best. She does look pregnant to me, she has this glow and looks a bit fuller in the face.

    • p'enny says:

      Eddie? Reddy Eddie?

      nooooooo, Tom can act for starters :-p

      Actually, i dont mean that i really Eddie think he was marvelous in Theory of Everything. However, like Tom? nah. Their dress sense is very different, colouring and acting style are rather different.

    • jammypants says:

      I feel that way about Batches. I don’t get it.

    • Cranberry says:

      Eddie #2 ? Oh god he’s a far cry from Eddie. If you can’t tell the difference between Tom and Eddie, I just don’t know what to say. Btw I’m not talking about acting. They’re both good actors with different strengths, imo. But when it comes to looks, Eddie doesn’t even rate.

      • Farhi says:

        Both are bo-ring. Their public behavior is so controlled and calculated, they never say anything controversial, always safe. They are complete blanks to me, nothing to get interested about.
        Looks are superficial, I don’t care about looks. There has to be a spark of personality to illuminate the looks and for me it is not there.

      • Cranberry says:

        @Farhi, Well TH may not say anything too controversial I’ll agree, but boring and no spark of personality? I don’t think you’ve seen much of Hiddles and how loony and unpredictable he’s been. This past year or two has been very tame compared to 2013 and earlier, but he’s had a lot of work lined up back to back, and he’s trying to be more serious now. After all he’s doing more serious roles now, not just Loki for the comic-con and MTV crowd.
        Even when Tom is pretty tame and even boring, I still find him quite interesting cause he can be so earnest and almost naive and goes on and on without any inkling about time or staying on topic. He can go from sexy to cringe and back to adorable in the span of an interview. I’ve been quit bemused by him many times.

        Sad though, I don’t think well see the days of 2011-2013 again. We must all change and grow (old), but he was definitely game for anything and totally delivered some doozies which I will continue to enjoy on YT.
        If I might suggest some of these clips:

        NYCC 2011 “Pure Imagination” / Beautiful Man:

        Tom’s potty mouth in Reel Junkie’s :

        ‪Tom Hiddleston dancing on Chatty Man [HD]‬ :

        Slumber party with TH and Josh :

        and the exciting? cringy? entertaining? so uncool it’s cool? you decide,
        TH dancing South Korea 2013: https://youtu.be/7GaO0oMniMQ?t=15s

        and more recently,
        TH doing Ali G impression :

      • Farhi says:

        I’ve seen both MTV versions with Josh, they were all over tumblr. The one with Jessica is especially cringeworthy and fake. Boring. This is not a real Tom, he is just playing to the public.

        I have a suspicion the real Tom is the one who overthinks everything, well educated, insecure, and likes to speak on philosophical topics and the meaning of life. But this is not what he sells, and I am not interested in buying the image he sells. Maybe when he grows up a little bit and is more comfortable with who he rally is I’ll take another look at him.

      • Cranberry says:

        @Farhi, Well I don’t think you can have it both ways. I’m not saying I know what Tom is truly like, but I think we can all get pretty good idea, although not conclusive, based on many occasions and situations as we would of anyone.

        Everyone has different sides to their persona. We’re not all one way all the time except when were being fake like you seem to be suggesting of TH. Yeah, he overthinks things, is ambitious and has insecurities, but I certainly don’t think that’s the sum total of who he is, not by a long shot. The idea that there’s just one “real” Tom is just an unrealistic standard that people tend to put on celebrities to judge them, imo.
        I don’t think TH is selling anything that’s not par for the course. I think these are all parts of his personality as much as anything else is. He can be educated or over analytical and still be able to have fun and put it all out there. That’s why he’s an actor (of theater & film). I also think that this public persona that you say he’s selling is actually very real and has been that way since a child. That’s why it comes to him so easily, and that’s why I find him interesting because he seems to have many contrasting sides to him and they are all genuine and yet ultimately unknowable on a public level.
        You don’t have to like him of course, but I truly don’t think he’s as manipulative as you suggest nor boring as per my links. Although I agree about the MTV video with Jessica being cringe-y and totally fake and silly, but they’re actors with a substantial MTV following.

      • jammypants says:

        You know what’s boring? Having one side of a personality. He’s shown us many sides, from cringey goofy and fun to professional and serious. He’s a team player but he knows how to steer the conversation back to what’s important. I’m glad for it. Human beings don’t fit into neat little boxes with neat labels. If he was what everyone wanted him to, THEN I’d find him boring. But he does what he wants and that displeases some people, then so be it.

      • Cranberry says:

        @Farhi – “The one [MTV vid] with Jessica is especially cringeworthy and fake. Boring. This is not a real Tom, he is just playing to the public.”

        Farhi I misread your comment. I totally agree with you on this point. This is not the real Tom or Jess for sure. The slumber party one from 2011 I think is a genuine “version” of Tom even though it’s all still playing to the public.
        I realize you didn’t say he was “fake” about everything else. Yes we differ as to who he “really” is and whether he’s “selling” an image, but I just wanted to clear that up if I came off too strong. Sorry.

  23. Madly says:

    I think it is more a friends with benefits situation. There are plenty of sightings of them both doing things and not together.

    The games are getting old though. He seems to old for this stuff.

  24. p'enny says:

    i wish people stop making a fuss over nothing.

    As for that dress, it’s ok tent dress, but her eye make up isnt good.

  25. hermia says:

    If she isn’t why the unflattering dress? If she is, why not come out and say it? It’s all beyond childish.

    • Freebunny says:

      Girl has poor taste in clothes.

    • NUTBALLS says:

      Their cloak and dagger routine is very childish and unnecessary. This pictorial evidence makes them both look ridiculous. There’s nothing wrong with two people fancying each other and spending time together. I don’t know why Tom has to be so weird about dating in the public eye. Plenty of other actors just go about their dating life in a normal way and without addressing it publicly. He should take notes from Fassbender.

      • p'enny says:

        Fassbender has played the on-off relationship card rather fast and furious over the years and the PR game as well. I really dont think he’s a good role model.

        Tom obviously not ready for the red-carpet walking yet, i think hes really fed-up with the teeny-tiny fans who think too much and want to know everything. he wants the focus on the films.

      • p'enny says:

        And, lets be honest this relationship isnt going to last. which is another reason why Hiddles probably doesnt want to go overboard with red carpet announcements. She and He have said, career comes first. I bet they are both expecting to crumble pretty fast. He has a brain for starters, their conversation must be pretty limited :-p

      • I Choose Me says:

        You must not read the Fassbender/Alicia posts. Everyone seems convinced that everyone else is shady all the time.

        And now I kind of almost hope she is pregnant just cause the ensuing fan fallout would be spectacular.

      • Becky says:

        Oooh Penny burn! Yeah she’s not exactly the intellectual is she?

        From what they’ve both said they are friends though (prob with benefits ;)

      • ell says:

        i just don’t get why fans expect actors to be upfront about their relationships, whenever it’s absolutely well known that if they do date publicly their privacy gets completely invaded? they’re not the first couple keeping it quiet, tons are like that. there are even examples of actual married couples who still refuse to talk about their oh, or pose together on the red carpet.

      • Nutballs says:

        P’enny, I’m referring to the fact that Fassbender actually does things in public with his girlfriend. They vacation together, eat out, go to music festivals, go to the races, attend events together, visit each others families — just like normal couples do. I have no problem with the fact that he doesn’t talk about his relationship with journos. He doesn’t need to.

        But I’m not in the camp that thinks Fassy & Alicia are a PR couple. I think they’re the real deal, but probably won’t last.

      • Farhi says:

        “Fassbender actually does things in public with his girlfriend”

        Agree with you there. That is what makes me think Hiddles is a player because he seems to behave like those guys in college who hide their relationships and have a new girl every other week. Strictly for sex. And then discard her. Something is not right when one holds up Fassy as an example of a proper boyfriend. ))

      • NUTBALLS says:

        P’enny, of course it’s not going to last. But the statement that he wants folks to only focus on his films falls flat in light of the pap walks. No way in hell where they “caught” in London. Taking Lizzy to a cafe he’s known to frequent (where he’s been stalked) and then to the Wolseley was a deliberate publicity move, especially in light of the festering rumors during the previous two months. Tom is rarely photographed when he’s out and about in London and he knows how to keep his ladies out of public view. That time he chose not to — twice — when their Oscar-buzzed film was weeks away from it’s big premier.

        Farhi, I don’t know as much about Fassy except that he had a couple of year-long (?) relationships with co-stars prior to Alicia. The fact that they appear to still be going strong more than a year later tells me it’s not PR.

        I don’t think THEO is PR either. I think they’re friends who have moved into the FWB realm and that they are using it for some press. Both of them benefited from the advanced publicity prior to TIFF, but nowadays, I think she’s got more of a PR agenda with it since she’s been out of work for awhile and nothing coming up in the near future. She gets PR and he gets a young, curvy beautiful woman showing up on his doorstep ready to rumble in the sheets. What man would say no to that??

    • Cranberry says:

      So let me get this right. You’re saying Tom Hiddleston needs to mislead, lie and play games with women to get them to sleep with him?

      I think you’ve called Tom is a player before, but you’ve never given any juice to back it up. That’s a pretty harsh label to put on some that you’ve got no real facts to even suggest that of his character. A “Player” reputation is not a secret that can be kept. That’s the whole point. Someone gets the reputation of being a Player because everyone knows they bounce around from woman to woman lying and/misleading them. If TH was a player, it would already have been out there in all the gossip sites and rags. In the time of smart phones, most any public thing Tom does is put up on social media instantly. So if he was a player, someone would have found out by now, either a woman he used or her friends. Someone would have dished it all out by now. So don’t confuse someone who casually dates and sleeps with women for someone who lies and misleads women for sex or ego games. It’s not the same at all.

  26. Whatabout says:

    Whoa that’s Erin moriarty in the pics. She’s in skull island.

  27. vauvert says:

    Meh. That dress is beyond fug but everything designed by Stella is, so no big deal. I like Tom regardless of who he is hooking up with, or whether they date/get married whatever. I just hope he doesn’t go down the crazy route Ben took last year. (On the plus side he has no Oscar to shill for so hopefully they won’t try to make this into the GRAND love story of our times.) She broke off with her fiancee and hooked up with Tom, not admirable but it’s her life.

  28. AntiSocialButterfly says:

    Love those shoes!

  29. Meee4 says:

    Add me to the not preggo, she’s a notoriously bad dresser camp. Plus since she soooo obviously working sooo hard on her career, when would she have time for all that parenting requires? Lol!? Oh wait just hire a nice young nanny…..*snort*

  30. jammypants says:

    Stella’s designs are never flattering on anyone.

  31. browniecakes says:

    TH’s bday is coming up. If she is in Australia for his bday, that would be pretty solid proof. It’s a long way to fly for just a friendship. Time will tell. THEO will be promoting ISTL in March so they’ll get the questions for sure.

  32. spidey says:

    Re these fashions shows – as I don’t know how it works, do the actresses turn up and get given clothes to wear on the night? Do they have a choice as to what they wear? Because if she chose to wear that herself, I don’t think much of her choice of bra to go with it.

  33. Guest says:

    Hahaha so much for the ” we are just friends” bull…. I hate childish games. Same old Hiddles. Playing the there is nothing to talk about card and then boom. I for one also think that they banged each other during filming. Doesn’t speak for her and not for him. They deserve each other. For all the hiding, probably cheating, the lie and Pap Walk… Oh Hiddles…. Of all women you chose Olsen. Laughable. And leaves a very bad taste for ISTL. He put his soul into the role…. Hahaha more into his pants.

    • jammypants says:

      To be fair, maybe there isn’t something to write home about if it’s friends with benefits. Who airs that kind of laundry you know? You don’t see Leo proclaim he’s banging someone. If it’s only gotten serious the past few weeks after months of sexy times, then whatever they said to deny back then doesn’t become invalidated now.

      • Velvet, Crushed says:

        EXACTLY, @jammypants! I would reveal the name/identity of a friend with benefits only to a very few trusted individuals, and only if it were contextually relevant. The idea that adults are beholden to OTHER ADULTS to reveal casual encounters and relationships BOGGLES MY MIND. Why would anyone with any pretenses of adulthood admit to feeling entitled to know about a relationship which has been influenced from its presumed beginning by the vast distance between the two parties and their work schedules? The only time I have wondered as to whether or not the relationship might be serious enough to warrant its disclosure to the public was when they were photographed by the paparazzi in London at a restaurant that has been described as a place at which photographers are known to be. Beyond that, I am happy to satisfy myself with speculation and guesswork when the boredom of my own life becomes burdensome. That fact that there is fodder for that speculation and guesswork doesn’t entitle me to any official information.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        Velvet, Crushed –

        Going to The Wolseley is not what you do when you want to keep your FWB status out of the press. As a Londoner, Tom knew full well what he was doing when he took his rumored hookup there. In that instance, they were looking for some column inches just ahead of ISTL’s TIFF premier.

        Don’t forget that back in July their film had Oscar buzz around it. We haven’t seen any more pap walks after the film fell under the critic’s guillotine at TIFF.

      • Cranberry says:

        Even if the pap walk at the Wolseley was for PR, that still doesn’t mean they owe the public or fans, any disclosure of their sex life. And even if they’re fwb, they’re still friends and colleagues that have every right to go to diner with each other without confirming any rumors or gossip. You might be right that THEO are together or fwb, but it’s still all speculation really. But happy hunting and pass me a Pervy Tombanger.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        Cranberry, The point I’m making is not that they owe anyone an explanation, but that if they really wanted to keep their fling out of the spotlight, then they wouldn’t have done the pap walks prior to TIFF.

        Mr. Date-Under-The-Radar doesn’t suddenly start waltzing down the street with his arm around his reported lover and take her to dinner at a known pap hangout unless he wants attention. That’s what I’m saying. When it comes to using their fling for PR, they’re both guilty.

        If they really wanted to boink without people knowing then take the leaked rumor and pap walks out of the equation and there’s nothing left to criticize. It’s the putting it out there for people to see then acting like nothing’s going on that bugs me. It’s disingenuous.

      • Velvet, Crushed says:

        @BALLES-AUX-NOIX — I think the fact that they were almost certainly seeking attention deliberately doesn’t change the fact that the audience is still not entitled to know the nature of their relationship. My guess is that they are occasionally friends with benefits, who are both ambitious enough to front as though something more serious might be occurring, and get along well enough for the short spurts of time required to act it out convincingly. I don’t think outings, no matter how visible, require explanations. I don’t enjoy hearing of publicity antics (I am repulsed by them, actually,) but it doesn’t surprise me that moderately successful, ambitious actors use it to further their careers.

      • spidey says:

        “”@BALLES-AUX-NOIX “” Haha love it Velvet.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        PANNE-DE-VELOURS, I agree.

    • neverland says:

      This comment just reminds me of the people harassing Jordan Vogt-Roberts on Instagram, yikes.

      • Guest says:

        Harassing? Me? Nope. Seriously it just leaves a very bad taste. He can be with anyone who he wants to be but just be honest. No one said that he should have said: Yeah I am banging her….. Why not: I do not want to talk about this…. Why the friends card? Because he was not sure? Because she was not sure? Then tell your PR guy that no one should ask personal questions. It is very easy you know. And if someone still asks then be honest. Bohoooo. If they are dating…. Good for them. Hiddles is not the perfect guy everyone thanks he is. He will parade her if he gets the PR…

      • jammypants says:

        @Guest, they were only ever publicly asked once about their romance, during TIFF.

        I never thought he was perfect. But he is yummy!

    • Guest says:

      As Nutballs once said: if you are not a thing why not denying it straight away like Jessica chastain did? Why waiting till Toronto, getting bad reviews for the movie itself and then saying something? I honestly do not get the reference to Evans and Renner then. Well. How should have changed anything within two months after Toronto while he was promoting the hell for CP? But hey she is banging the right guy it seems. And no hate. Really. I do not want to harrass anyone but I am so sick of people who are saying one thing but doing the opposite. No one says he should make everything public but geez…
      But here comes the but: holy he does look incredible these days… Wow.

  34. kri says:

    Would she be pregnant with dragon…larvae? Oh, grossed myself out on that one. I will cackle with glee if she is knocked up. I want a velvet birthing couch.

  35. seesittellsit says:

    The dress is unflattering and she could be pregnant – or not. Who knows? But if she is, why doesn’t she just say so, and if it’s Hiddles’ doing, what is the damn problem with just coming out with it for both of them? What are they waiting for, the birth announcement?! Do they really think the rest of the world gives a hoot?! Unless, of course, it’s Abrams’ and TH is just the decoy . . . nah, too farfetched. Out with it, girls and boys: we really will get on with our lives! Promise!

  36. noway says:

    Here’s the thing women with breasts usually can’t wear a totally shapeless dress or tunic, because you run the risk of looking pregnant. Doesn’t matter if you are thin or not, your breasts just make the dress jut out giving you the pregnancy look. Now this dress is so shapeless it is making a not really large breasted woman look like she could be pregnant. Great job Stella who is this dress for Jaden Smith?

  37. MexicanMonkey says:

    I just wanna see this for the sake of all the crazy dragonflies out there. Tom and Lizzie may as well be together but they have not been “playing games” with fans or with the present, they have only been photographed together once! And I’m honestly starting to believe that they were caught and it wast planned. But either ways, ONCE in a whole year. Twitter sightings are not pr plants and the director or a big budget film posting a picture on Instagram isn’t a part of an evil scheme to rile up tumblr fans. Perspective people!
    And before someone mentions rumors on whatever shady websites, more than 90% of these are rehashed from other websites or just made up for online clicks.
    If THEO really wanted to use the relationship for pr they would be photographed every other day together not hiding. This looks more like two people trying to be private and not succeeding. And after the debacle on JVR’s Instagram I honestly don’t blame either of them.

  38. Kate says:

    I long for the days when this website wasn’t so blatantly click-baity. Wow.

    NB: Tom is too much of a control freak to accidentally get someone pregnant, I’d wager. A child means the attention would no longer be ALLLLL on him, after all. ;)

    • Cranberry says:

      Oh, I know Tom’s married to his career, but he’s really good with children. When he’s around kids he really engages with them and gives them a lot of attention. There’s some adorable videos on YT and there’s also the accounts of Mark Ruffalo’s son who could not get enough of Tom throughout the shooting of Avengers. After watching him with kids I truly believe Tom really wants children, maybe not right now but I think very soon.
      That’s the one thing I worry about with the idea of THEO. When it comes to love and validation, Tom is susceptible to taking the quickest, surest path instead of risking a long, lonely wait to find someone truly compatible to have a family with. I feel his infatuation with EO, a pretty, glamorous, young american actress, might tempt him to seal the deal if he thought he might have his own family sooner than later. Then he would have it all: the trophy wife, forever famous (at least by marriage) on both sides of the Atlantic, beautiful children — yup, very tempting. Good thing EO is also focused on her career and probably doesn’t want to have kids anytime soon.

      And yeah, totally agree with the blatant click-baiting. So obvious, even if I did just completely run away with the idea.

  39. Beach girl says:

    My opinion? Wearing that dress was a little baity. Not a style I’ve seen her in. Interesting timing with ‘oops’ photos from Hawaii and sighting in London over the holiday. Gearing up for ISTL promo and Marvel…

  40. JenniferJustice says:

    I dont’ see any sign of a “bump”. All I notice, as usual, is she’s had plastic surgery recently. She looks completely different.

    • Velvet, Crushed says:

      I agree completely that her face does look quite different, but I think it’s a result of her makeup not having been professionally done. It was noted upthread that her eye-makeup is not very detailed or symmetrical, and, to me, the foundation/contouring work results in her face catching the light in unusual ways.

    • elise says:

      YES! I’ve been scrolling to see if anyone else mentioned her face. I’m glad I’m not the only one who noticed that something has been recently tweaked. If she were preggo (I’m in the no camp), that might explain the fuller looking face. My first thought was an obvious dose of cheek fillers that haven’t settled in yet.

  41. Ninette says:

    No, I dont think she look pregnant…. yet. A Hiddleston/Olsen baby would be so cute.

  42. Marianne says:

    I think the only reason she looks “pregnant: is because its a sack like dress.

  43. Anon222 says:

    Didn’t she look pregnant last Oct when she’s wearing a loose sweater to one of the ISTL screening? Maybe she just like wearing loosely fit clothes. She also wears her sisters’ brand pretty often, which means her fashion sense isn’t that good to say the least.

    But full disclosure, I hope she’s pregnant, I also look forward to seeing the meltdown of those overinvested fans and how they cry the injustice, that they don’t deserve not being told their king is in love but not with them.

  44. Jamie says:

    These two are obviously just getting together every now and then and humping each other. They are together so infrequently. She is probably one of many that Tom is humping. Jordan’s photos were taken on the night they were at laser tag. And Tom was seen a lot around Honolulu by himself. There were some hardcore stalkers down there, and they said they never saw her with him. Just like in London, they were seen together that one weekend, and then Tom was out going to the theater by himself, eating out alone. At TIFF they wouldn’t even sit together at their premiere. She was hanging all over Marc Abram. They showed up at the other parties at different times. They aren’t talking about it because most likely there is nothing to talk about. Two grown ass adults, who are friends, that get together, have fun, and hump each other. When I was in the military, I had quite a few guys on speed dial that I would hit up depending on where I was. We would get together, hang out with our friends, go out on a date or two, spend a couple days going at it, and then go along our way till the next time. I didn’t run and tell everyone about it. There was nothing to tell. If this has supposedly been going on for almost a year, they would be seen together more frequently……and they wouldn’t have a problem with it. It’s most likely just f**k buddies. That man is probably humping way more than just Olsen.

  45. rosiek says:

    Lovely color and fabric, poor fit. Why is her bra hanging out ? Liked the shoe style, the color not so much.

    All actors play the PR game with their relationships or non-relationships–who cares really ? I think they look good together. Best to relax and see what unfolds– if anything. Am not sure any actor would be easy to live with, it’s a crazy lifestyle.

  46. KittYKat says:

    Erm has anyone reached out to EO or TH teams for a confirmation? Come on even The Daily Fail even reach out to the reps before posting Trollish things like this.
    I know there was rumours of her wearing baggy jumpers and hiding her front behind big bags from photos of her in Dec but at the same time she’s appeared wearing fitting clothes showing her flat tummy during the same month.

    All I see is a woman wearing a loose fitting dress. Without a confirmation denial or no comment on personal life from their reps I take it for what this story is- Awful trolling and click bait.

    I don’t think TH would hide a GF even for privacy as it would highlight it even more and make crazy fans even more intrusive . Go with the flow you know?

    Peace out my friends X

  47. Lucy2 says:

    Bad dress. Stella’s career never would have happened without her connections and famous friends willing to wear that stuff.

    I have zero opinion about them as a couple. Or individually really.

  48. Lilacflowers says:

    Off the Olsen topic, but far more interesting to me, High-Rise has received a nomination for Best Picture in the Evening Standard Film Awards.

    • spidey says:

      And will be released in the US on 13 May apparently.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        So he’ll have three projects releasing in three months, here in the US at least — ISTL in March, TNM in April and HR in May. That’s going to trigger another Tommy Tsunami, methinks.

        I’m happy to say that I can now watch BBC iPlayer, so I plan to catch TNM when it premiers in Feb in the UK. Using my free week of unblock-us service to catch the new Luther, And Then There Were None and War and Peace, now that I’ve seen all the movies I need to see for now…

    • guest says:

      What about the Baftas? No nomimation? Meh. I mean why didn’t they publish the movie earlier? Pretty sure it would have been a contender…..

    • Maxime DuCamp says:

      @lilacflowers Thanks for the High Rise update. On the one hand May 13 seems so far away, on the other it’s close to my birthday, so yay me. And it’s nice that it’s spaced out from ISTL and TNM, so that we can have 3 months of TH rather than having everything all jammed together.

      As for THEO, I can’t understand how people can see the major kerfluffle everytime there’s an article about them and hen wonder why they’d want to keep whatever relationship they have–be it “just friends,” fwb, or a true romantic pairing–quiet. TH seems to have created some strong boundries between his work and his private life in the last few years and I think that it’s a wise decision on his part for the preservation of his sanity.

    • Gingerly says:

      High-rise received ES award nomination for production design, too. I am glad the film got some recognition.

  49. Rocket says:

    I have no clue about their relationship status, but they definitely used it to promote their film for a little while.
    All celeb ladies seem to stand pigeon toed these days. Is it supposed to have a flattering effect on your legs?

  50. Bint says:

    Are we even sure that photo wasn’t photoshopped? It looks photoshopped to me as she doesn’t look like she belongs somehow. Like…I don’t know…she was just added haphazardly?

    • guest says:

      Why should a director post a photoshopped picture on his instagram account? *scratches head* It is Olsen. I saw the picture for a couple of seconds and recognized her by return.

      • Bint says:

        Just a thought @guest. No need to bite ones head off. She just seemed out of place in the photos. Maybe because she’s the only one that’s wearing a sweater in Hawai’i.

        And I don’t think her stance is giving the preggo look here. I’ve seen her in tentish dresses before, and she’s not looked wide.

    • spidey says:

      I had wondered that but couldn’t understand why JVR would do it.

      • TotallyBiased says:

        For the record, I DON’T think the pics are photoshopped. Having said that, it is a little odd that she didn’t show up in any of the Lazer Tag pics before now. And I began considering the kind of energy and humour coming out of this crew–the pranking, the goofing off in videos and message postings–and it suddenly doesn’t seem entirely outside the realm of possibility that JVR decided to (or was talked into) pranking/teasing Tom.
        Which changes absolutely nothing, but is yet another theory to consider when we’re bored waiting for Night Manager.
        Heh. :)

  51. Bint says:

    As for the preggo rumour, she does look a bit glowy, I even see a bit of slope to her form under that dress (she’s wider). Frankly, her cheeks are fuller too (she looks better with a bit of weight on her).

    And I’ve seen better Stella fashion before. She made a line of ladies trousers that were brilliant.

    • Jamie says:

      She always looks a bit Preggo though, cause she stands with her stomach out. It’s a very unflattering stance.

      • Cranberry says:

        Yeah, there’s always been something off about her posture &/or composure. I think when she’s acting she might correct it and looks good, but otherwise either her clothes make her body look odd or she just can’t hold herself up well. I think she has some body issues. She’s a little busty and maybe developed early and coupled with all the media attention run off of her sisters makes her tend to hide behind her clothes.

  52. Heather says:

    Meh. She always dresses like she’s wearing a tent. The only thing shocking about this is, it’s not black. *shock*

    I do have to laugh at recent bleatings in gossip rags about how much she wants to concentrate on her career. I didn’t realise Hiddles was the one in charge of these auditions. ;)

    I wonder if it bothers her her peers like Brie Larson are getting accolades and she is not. She has to reduce herself to following Hiddles wherever he is? Sad. I am sick of this rearing it’s ugly head whenever ISTL is mentioned too… hope someone hires her soon and this albatross of a film can finally be put to rest.

    • NUTBALLS says:

      It’s too bad the hookup stuff distracted from their work in ISTL, but since it’s not a great film to begin with (their performances notwithstanding), perhaps that distraction is a way of selling an inferior product.

      • Heather says:

        I do feel bad for Tom because he put so much work into it, going so far as to look deathly ill during Nov/Dec 2014. It must be more than a bit frustrating that all of this crap keeps detracting from the film – and it mostly comes from her camp too. “EO doesn’t want to be seen in public with TH” “EO wants to concentrate on her career”. Meanwhile, he still tries desperately to get people focusing on the film (see his FB posts whenever things go south in his personal life). It is one big disaster. Shame.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        Heather before you go putting the lion’s share of blame on Lizzy (which may be valid, post-TIFF), Tom agreed to do two very public outings with her after their rumored affair had been leaked to tabloids. So any pretense of wanting privacy looks disingenuous to me. It also pointed the finger at her PR team as the source of the leaked hookup rumor. He knows how to stay under the radar and he chose not to, plain and simple.

        This tells me that Tom will use his private life for PR if it achieves a particular aim, in this case, advance publicity for his Oscar-buzzed film as every article written about THEO referenced ISTL. Post-TIFF, he doesn’t need to use it for that purpose anymore, so no more pap walks, no more obvious grabs for attention.

        I would agree that the silly gossip articles that have come out of nowhere recently, (ie “Lizzy broke up with him to focus on her career”} does look like something driven by her publicist.

      • madly says:

        Someone suggested somewhere else that Lizzy’s people heard about the Boyd article and freaked out and that is where the break up articles came from.

      • jammypants says:

        That’s absurd. Please do not speak for everyone. The man is so private, we can only guess his favorite color is blue based on his interview/red carpet wardrobe. And no, the only ones distracted from the good work put into ISTL are those who are interested in their private lives. I do not feel distracted from their performances in ISTL at all. I was mesmerized by his Hank and her Audrey. What disaster are you inferring? The only disaster I see is the trainwreck of a script and confusing direction of the film.

        Although I will agree that the gossip PR angle seems to be coming from her camp.

      • erica says:

        I’ll never understand that interview with ISTL director Marc Abraham back in September , when he said, “I teased Tom one day when someone was writing about it. I said ‘Dude, I would pay people to write that I was having an affair with Elizabeth Olsen’. He said ‘Yeah, but you ain’t me.’ But I was just trying to keep him light so he didn’t worry about it.” Why would Tom be worrying about rumors of him and EO being romantically involved? Why would Marc Abraham even mention this in an interview?

      • Heather says:

        @jammy I wasn’t speaking for everyone, just calling it like *I* am seeing it. Perhaps I should have put “IMO” somewhere in my comment. Will know better for next time..

      • Velvet, Crushed says:

        @erica, I found that interview to be almost disturbing. The kindest thing one might say of someone who would utter something so stupid and inappropriate is that they would be confident enough to produce a terrible screenplay. The ick-factor is, of course, amplified by the photos of Abraham and Olsen holding hands at TIFF. I realize a directer who would be invested in fanning the flames of any rumor of a liaison between co-stars would find a passive-aggressive means of doing so, but reading this particular snippet of that interview gave me shivers.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        Aren’t we all talking from our personal point of view and perspective? When I watched the love scene between Tom and Lizzy, I was wonder just how much “acting” those two were doing, wondering if they had already started an affair when filming that scene. So for me, the THEO gossip was distracting to my experience of seeing the film.

        Panne de Velours, I thought Marc’s comments were very weird and the hand-holding to be fanbaity as well as disturbing. Directors don’t normally comment on their lead actor’s liaisons; it’s not professional or their place to do so. He gave me “creepy old man” vibes.

      • Velvet, Crushed says:

        I was hesitant to declare my own impression of “creepy old man vibes,” so I am relieved to read your impression first.

  53. Meee4 says:

    Well there’s also the simple possibility that she simply has put on some weight. Not working, hanging out and overindulging in thanksgiving/xmas goodies can have that effect. Maybe it just shows in her face/stomach. Not being a jerk but it happens like that sometimes.

  54. Jena says:

    They are totally together and they don’t owe anyone a shred of information. I do find it odd that she has no movie in development as she is in high demand. So……

    • Heather says:

      She’s in ‘high demand’?? LOL, I must have missed that memo.

      Perhaps she has no movie in development because *whispers* she is just not that great an actress. ;)

    • NUTBALLS says:

      High demand? Have you seen her IMDB? She hasn’t worked since finishing Civil Wars last June. Right now, all she has is Marvel and she’s a minor character in that cinematic world.

      Once she’s done promoting Civil Wars, she’s out of the spotlight for a scary long time unless she gets busy soon. which is unfortunate — I thought she was great in Martha Marcy May Marlene.

      • Dara says:

        She’s lucky to have the financial resources to be “selective”, if that’s what is going on. Or maybe she just doesn’t have the blinding ambition and hustle required to break through. I do think she’s a good enough actress to be working steadily, or at least more often, if that’s what she really wanted.

        I understand not wanting to take a job just to be working – some of the roles out there are pretty crappy, and probably not worth the paycheck – but I also get the sense she enjoys living a leisurely life – travel, shopping, parties, cooking classes, etc. I don’t blame her for that, sounds like fun to me.

    • Becky says:

      She’s based in LA, he lives in London and has a packed filming schedule, they’ve been spotted infrequently, totally together doesn’t make sense, is FWB more likely

    • erica says:

      High demand? She has no projects as of yet other than ISTL and Civil War. Also Tom was in LA and everyone thought he was there for her. He was there with Hugh Laurie and the cast of The Night Manager for TCA 2016. Don’t assume anything….

  55. spidey says:

    As a complete aside I wonder why a certain site has locked her tumblr blog against non-tumblrs?

  56. lilacflowers says:

    Clearly, Tom has two choices. Stop being so “childish,,” and start releasing daily press updates on all interactions he has with women, complete with video. Or, join a religious order that requires a vow of celibacy and release daily updates on that.

    • Cranberry says:

      haahaa. Daily updates on a celibacy vow could get pretty pervy. ;P

    • Madly says:

      Meh, I think you are being sensitive.

      Most people just want him to own it or stop playing games of are we or aren’t we. I can see their point.

      • Lilacflowers says:

        To be sensitive, I would need to care one way or the other. I don’t. I actually much prefer when celebrities don’t publicly announce every relationship, no matter how new or brief. Everyone does not need to live like the Kardashians.

      • jammypants says:

        It’s a shame he didn’t comply and compromise his privacy. I mean how dare he holds onto what he values. Lack of complete information in the age of technology. Can you imagine? Poor dears 😨

      • Madly says:

        He DID compromise though. That is why even sane fans are rolling their eyes over this. This isn’t a down low situation. This is a situation where at least one party is putting things out there and the other is going along with it.

        But yeah, I’m the childish one for noticing the change. Mmmkay. If it makes you feel better.

      • jammypants says:

        I don’t see it as compromise. He’s living his life. Good for him. I’m sane, and I’m not rolling my eyes. I am rolling my eyes that people are making a big deal out of their relationship. I’m a fan and all I can think when I see anything on THEO: WHO CARES! Big deal! Let them have sex and have fun! :P What does it matter at all? People want in on their “thing”. Entitlement to know “stuff”. What does that get them? Gratification? A sense of closure? Free kittens?

        “This is a situation where at least one party is putting things out there and the other is going along with it.”

        And what’s wrong with that? I just don’t get it =/

        This equates to how pointless and intrusive it is at Christmas parties when relatives ask me when I’m getting married or having a baby. It’s not their business and they are not entitled to know anything. And if I happen to have friends tag me on social media kissing a guy’s cheeks, I’m sure hell would break loose and same people would demand why I’m not alleviating my single status. I would still wonder why it matters so much and what it has to do with anything.

      • Cranberry says:

        @Lilac “Everyone does not need to live like the Kardashians”

        Omg, so so right!
        I think that’s what it’s come to now with all the stupid, vapid, un-reality shows. People/fans think that all celebrities are in one big reality show and are entitled to every part of their lives.

      • Cranberry says:

        Hi @Madly
        Even if he did compromise once, that doesn’t mean they are playing games. Nor is it tantamount to a mandate that they publicly confirm their personal relations to their fans. It’s just not that important really.

      • lilacflowers says:

        For all anyone knows, the reality could be that’s he’s gay but has acquired a lovesick Olsen stalker who is following him all over the world and he tolerates it because he has to work with her again on Infinity Wars. But no, for some, (and please note that I say “some,” not “most,” not “all,” not “many”) for some the only reality can be what they have speculated and anything else is a lie or a game and why won’t he just come out and admit what they have convinced themselves must be true, despite the fact that there could be a hundred other real explanations.

      • lilacflowers says:

        @jammypants, can I have a kitten?

      • jammypants says:

        @Lilac, I have only grey tabbies presently. I’m sure you won’t mind. They’re perfectly suited for your veranda parties. They deliver biscuits and lollies instead of dead pests. Very pleasant.

      • Portia says:

        FWIW, I agree with you, Madly. It’s a private situation. It’s clear to me that they’re not really in a serious relationship and it’s a FWB arrangement for whenever either is in the mood or in town. That means you keep it discreet. For me, those tabloids leaks sound like they all came from her. If those leaks hadn’t started, no one would be even bothering with THEO or trying to find pics of them together or anything. It sounds like to me Olsen likes the attention she gets from her name getting associated with higher profile actors and she’s going to milk her association with Tom for as long as she can while she’s enjoying the perks of having him as a FWB. If he was really her boyfriend, she would respect his desire for privacy and leak nothing. But since he’s just a hookup buddy, it’s all fair game and since he never addressed anything about his personal life, it’s easier for her to play that game.

        I know I’m going to get that whole spiel about them being just friends and it’s the tabloids fault for printing fake gossip but the language in all those leaks is very much in favor of Elizabeth and they slam Tom again and again. That’s not some idle gossip. Those are specific leaks and hints given by someone’s rep. When you’re friends who occasionally hook up, you keep that quiet. No one has any way of knowing that you’re hooking up unless you tell them and Lizzie wanted to kiss and tell and started up this whole game in May.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        Portia, all good points. Tom willingly participated in stoking the fire last July, so he’s not blameless, but it’s pretty obvious that she’s using Tom to raise her profile. He’s using her for casual, no-nonsense sex. Not terribly romantic in my personal opinion, but it achieves their individual goals.

      • Becky says:

        @Jammypants while I agree that they don’t owe anyone an explanation as its their personal business, I have to agree with Madly & Portia here, and as Nutballs has also pointed the whole use of your personal life for pr is disingenuous.

        When that FT piece Tom wrote came out I side-eyed this part: “I have learned a whole new set of skills in dodging headline-chasing hot potatoes: those questions designed to elicit a sensationalist answer more likely to drive traffic to a given website” – you mean this site and other gossip sites or tabloids? Mate, you asked for it you can’t have it both ways.

        If you want to keep your personal life private, don’t let your co-star and rumoured hook-up or whatever drop stories to tabloids then turn up at a high profile restaurant where celebs go to be seen, and is known as a paparazzi hangout, and get ambushed so your plus 1 loses it and walks round with a scarf over her face. All of that could’ve been avoided if you’d kept the whole thing on the down-low.

        If that had been done all there would be is that candid pic (which neither of them had any control over), and even then the attention was drawn by that US Weekly story, and this recent Instagram pic and a few vague sightings. There wouldn’t be a load of articles on gossip sites and anywhere near the click-bait going on.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        Becky, well put.

        If Tom was bothered by the speculation, I’d have zero sympathy for him. He willingly went on two public outings with Lizzy — demonstrating in one of them more affection than he ever did with JArthy — and thrust his private life into the spotlight. If he’s continued to hook up with her as recently as November as her team keeps drop tabloid rumors, then he’s willingly letting his personal life be used for someone else’s PR. He has no one to blame but himself for that. If that’s the kind of person he wants to hook up with, then that says as much about him as it does about her.

      • jammypants says:

        @Portia, that’s a pretty reasonable assessment

        @Becky, he can mean a whole slew of things. It could include the gossip type questions, but he also had to dodge the hell out of Marvel related questions. One cannot come to such conclusion when his words were so vague in every way, except that one interview he gave at TIFF where he said they were just having dinner in London, which they were.

        @nutballs, I still don’t get what’s wrong that Tom “willingly went on two public outings with Lizzy”. Like really, there is nothing wrong with two people hanging out and hooking up. They can’t only see each other behind closed doors. For two people who may be seeing each other for well over a year now and only have two sightings, that does not seem like begging for attention. If Lizzie is secretly PR starved and Tom doesn’t seem to care as much as we think, then I still don’t see the big deal. None. Zilch. Nada.

      • neverland says:

        Nutballs, I’m a bit confused. You keep referring to their pap walks, plural. And how in one pap walk Tom had his arm around Elizabeth. By which I assume you’re talking about the photos sent to the Daily Mail?

        I’m just a bit confused because I was under the distinct impression that that was not a pap walk at all. That was the result of a Tumblr troll baiting people to take pictures. I highly doubt Tom or his team would seriously take a photo pretending to be a fan then send it to that blog of all places. That’s a bit too conspiracy theory for my tastes.

        I understand that people have different views on what is and isn’t PR but I really am surprised that you’ve repeatedly mentioned the fan creepshot as PR when out of everything discussed it’s probably the most easily proven fan-made part of the whole thing.

      • NUTBALLS says:

        For all of you who keep reading things into what I’m saying: I am not criticizing them for hooking up. The disingenuity of pretending to want privacy but putting their private life out in the spotlight is what I’m calling them out on.

        Question for you all. Since Tom and Susannah broke up in 2011, how many times has Tom been papped in London while eating out? Exclude the two times with Lizzy last summer. How many times has it happened? I can count three times — once, coming out of G&W with a script in his arms and talking to his PA. Once with Lara Pulver, the night after JArthy was seen with him at Wimbledon. Another time, he was seen after Coriolanus with Bendy and Emily. Any others I’m missing?

        That’s three times in 3.5 years. What this tells me is that he knows how to go out with friends, family and dates without getting captured by a camera. He knows the places he can eat out and take a date and stay private. Do you think he wasn’t going out with JArthy during the year between the two bona fide sightings? Do you think he wasn’t going to see theatre during those years and eating out afterwards?

        I don’t believe that the picture of him and Lizzy walking away from G&W with his arm around her shoulder was them getting caught, not in light of the rumors that had been festering for more than two months. He’s stalked at G&W by uberfans and they were looking for sightings of the two of them. If he really wanted to give no reason for anyone to believe they were hooking up, then taking Lizzy to his favorite neighborhood cafe and throwing his arm around her as they’re walking in broad daylight seems incredulous to me. You may not see it that way. Fine. But I think that was a part of the stirring of the PR pot, along with the very obvious pap walk at the Wolseley.

    • Lilacflowers says:

      That would depend on whether the particular religious order allows its celibate adherents to wear Loki pants. Additionally, someone did ask Tom if Loki wears underwear and the answer was Underarmor because the pants contain pieces of metal

  57. koko says:

    JMO, she doesn’t look pregnant. It’s just not a flattering style for her but I have a cover up dress for the beach that looks similar and it’s really comfortable. Maybe that’s what she was going for, comfort. OT, bummed that CP didn’t receive an Oscar nod for costumes. The movie may have not lived up to expectations but the costumes did.

  58. Cranberry says:

    @koko, @jammy
    Yeah, those dresses were over the top. Del Torro would have been great in the fashion world. (I know he didn’t really design them, but it’s still his vision)

  59. lilacflowers says:

    Sony Classics has released a new interview with Tom and Rodney. It is Part One, so a Part Two is probably forthcoming. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCruD_lL-5fmllpKMSL-yCyQ

  60. La La Land says:

    nose job … bad one at that

  61. spidey says:

    Well TOBY seems to have changed her mind.

  62. Gingerly says:

    The first trailer for TNM has arrived! Here is the link. youtu.be/EGCc_jtuz44
    It really looks like a modern Bond movie and the soundtrack is a bit similar to Sicario.

  63. Beach girl says:

    It’s glorious!!!!!! Done with THEO, on to what really matters; PINE!