People: Amber Heard & Billy Bob Thornton ‘absolutely did not have an affair’

wenn22836790

One of the constants in the coverage of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard’s divorce drama is that Depp was very, very jealous. He was jealous of Amber’s friendships with women and men. He was jealous that she had close friends she could count on. He was jealous that she worked with other men. He constantly worried that she was cheating on him or would soon cheat on him. Long-time Depp-watchers probably know that there have always been stories about Depp’s jealousy issues, from Winona to Kate Moss, probably even Vanessa Paradis had to deal with it too. As we discussed yesterday, Amber submitted photos to the court of the injury Depp sustained to his hand in March 2015. Depp was apparently drunk and high on ecstasy when he sliced off the top of his finger. He then dipped the finger in blue paint and wrote “Billy Bob” and “Easy Amber” on a mirror. As in, Johnny Depp thought his then-fiancee Amber Heard was fooling around with Billy Bob Thornton.

Billy Bob Thornton did not have an affair with Amber Heard, a source tells PEOPLE. During a heated argument that allegedly resulted in the actor severing his finger, Johnny Depp reportedly accused Heard, 30, of cheating on him with Thornton, but a source tells PEOPLE that is simply not true.

“Billy Bob definitely, absolutely did not have an affair with Amber,” says the source.

Heard and Thornton, 61, starred together in the still-unreleased thriller London Falls. The actress also adamantly denies having an affair, according to TMZ.

[From People]

In a separate story, People identifies the unnamed source as a “Thornton source.” As in, Billy Bob Thornton really doesn’t want to be in the middle of Amber and Johnny’s divorce drama and he wants to make it clear that there was nothing between himself and Amber. Well, he is married right now – he’s been with the same woman, Connie, for years. They married in 2014. Connie is his sixth wife.

As for Amber and Johnny and WILL THIS EVER END, there’s another update from TMZ about the now-stalled settlement discussions:

TMZ has learned there’s a stalemate in the legal war between Amber Heard and Johnny Depp … and it all has to do with a joint statement about what happened — or didn’t happen — on May 21. Sources connected with Amber tell TMZ, the sticking point is that Amber wants a joint statement in which Johnny admits he committed domestic violence. Our Amber sources say Johnny’s people came back loud and clear — he will NEVER sign a document in which he admits to domestic violence because he never committed it.

We’ve been reporting Amber demanded a phenomenal amount of money for their 15-month marriage … the parties have settled on around $8 million, including lawyers’ fees, but she wanted a lot more. Mind you — all she’d be entitled to is half the earnings that were left after taxes and living expenses, and we’re told they spent a lot of money together. And we’ve learned Amber has hired a new lawyer to helm her case — famed attorney Pierce O’Donnell, who recently repped Shelly Sterling in the Donald Sterling saga.

[From TMZ]

Am I alone in thinking that $8 million seems pretty paltry for this nightmare existence of being married to Johnny Depp? Let’s say that Johnny only did half of what Amber claims, how much would you want? I would want a lot more than $8 million. Especially considering Depp is reportedly worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

As for the idea of a joint statement… I can understand why Depp would flat-out refuse to sign off on that, just because he would be kneecapping himself professionally. But I also understand why Amber wants it: she wants some kind of acknowledgement that after all of the emotional abuse, physical abuse, psychological abuse, after all of the gaslighting and manipulations, that it was not “all in her head.” She wants Depp to say or show in some way that he really is the monster that she saw time and time again.

wenn23007839

wenn23580426

Photos courtesy of WENN, Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

93 Responses to “People: Amber Heard & Billy Bob Thornton ‘absolutely did not have an affair’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. jeanpierre says:

    I have a hard time understanding the legal side of this story. Why isn’t Johnny Depp prosecuted or being deposed? Can the judge decide to go to trial even if they settle?

    • Nicole says:

      Because they didn’t want it to go to trial and with witnesses saying they saw no injuries on Heard immediately after and the following days reasonable doubt comes into play.
      And no a judge won’t bring it to trial if they have a settlement because the whole point of the settlement is to avoid a public trial. If the judge signs off on the agreement then the case is closed.

      • jeanpierre says:

        Thank you Nicole. I still can’t wrap my mind around this. That means he (and others) can buy his way out of criminal charges? And those who can’t are prosecuted? How can the legal system allow this? I mean with the amount of evidence that she has, there should be at least a forced rehab and reevaluation of the kids’ custody.

      • JR says:

        I’m not a lawyer so I might be wrong here, but I think he is not being prosecuted because Amber declined to file formal assault/DV charges against him and pursued the restraining order instead. Not blaming her at all. Sorry I don’t know how to word it better but I am in no way implying it’s her fault he is not being charged because I think the LAPD could have overridden her wishes and charged him anyway (something about the law changing post-OJ Simpson trial) but as they contend that they saw no evidence of an assault, they didn’t do that. Someone who knows more than I do could probably clarify though.
        I have no idea why he doesn’t have to be deposed though.

      • Naya says:

        I am really confused. I was under the impression that this is the divorce case and that the media using “settlement” as a substitute term for division of marital assets/alimony because in practical terms thats what the amount he pays her would be. AFAIK there are no criminal charges. Perhaps they are still dealing with his challenge of the restraining order issue which I guess would be a civil matter, right? But then has she filed a DV suit? Who is taking who to trial? Is she suing him for DV or is he challenging her restraining order. Help…

    • K2 says:

      It’s a civil case, not criminal. Civil cases are between private individuals, and as court time costs the state there is every encouragement to settle. There are no criminal charges against Depp so the prosecuting authorities aren’t involved, and it’s not up to anyone else whether it goes to court.

      • Nicole says:

        Right as K2 said its a divorce settlement. Since heard didn’t bring charges typically the state won’t. It’s hard to prosecute without a willing victim. Depp wasn’t arrested that night and unless Amber presses charges then no criminal charges.

        The divorce is a civil case basically. A lot times if the burden of proof isn’t met for a criminal case then the civil right is the way people go. The burden of proof is a lot lower. It’s why police brutality victims get millions from the city when prosecutors decide not to bring charges (cause they suck).

        Heard never wanted this to go public so she wants a settlement. I’m guessing she will have to sign an NDA around their entire marriage which basically means if she talks she loses money. Which is what happened to Oskana recently.

      • Naya says:

        @Nicole. Thanks. Is the DV relevant in a divorce case though? I know it’s relevant for out of court negotiations since the perpetrator is a public figure but she also filed this evidence in court. Thats what throws me off because arent divorce cases basically just the judge disentangling the legal entity and splitting property? Does proving DV change how a judge would distribute property?

      • Lindsay says:

        California is a no fault divorce state so it wouldn’t effect what she is entitled to legally but to get a permanent restraining order along with your divorce you have to show cause. Even if it doesn’t change what she is legally entitled to it does give her leverage over Johnny in a settlement to sign an NDA.

      • I am also not a lawyer but I work in social services and my sister is a DA. In California the DA brings criminal charges against the perpetrator whether or not the victim chooses to press charges. Therefore it is not up to Amber, it is up to the district attorney. Because the police never arrested him and because they did not see evidence of DV, there will be no criminal prosecution, end of. The police report is what holds weight with the DA, not Amber’s allegation.

      • Stumpycorgi says:

        California is a no-fault divorce state, but DV can affect the case in terms of spousal support. If one of the parties has been *convicted* of abuse against the other in the five years prior to the filing, or any time thereafter, a rebuttable presumption is created against their receiving temporary and permanent spousal support from the victim. So in this case, if Johnny had been convicted, there were would be a rebuttable presumption (rebuttable meaning, contestable) that he should not receive spousal support from Amber. The idea is to protect victims from paying their abusers. But since Johnny is clearly the higher earner, he would be providing the spousal support anyway, not Amber. Plus he was never convicted of any violence against her. I’m not saying any of this is fair or right, just that those are the laws.

    • Lindsay says:

      The judge works in civil/family court. Just like their criminal judge counterparts they could overrule settlements/plea bargains, they usually don’t. The judge doesn’t have the authority to turn this over for criminal prosecution. Amber could have but didn’t, which happens a lot in domestic violence cases. In a he said/she said situation which is what the incident in LA would be they won’t press charges without the victims cooperation because they don’t have a case. So in crimes like this and rape you could buy off your accuser creatively because a divorce settlement or under the table cash is had to prove as witness tampering. Right now this is all civil and even if the judge agrees Amber was abused he won’t go to jail.

      JR is right, the state could have brought charges if they felt they had a strong enough case without her because it is between him and the state not him and her. They could even compell her to testify but they didn’t feel they had enough to win at trial.

      He does have a deposition date set which he is required to attend unless they settle beforehand.

    • Liz says:

      Amber has plenty of witnesses. Hers actually were present while Depp was having a meltdown. Her bruises were physically assessed by the court. They have also filed a sworn testimony with the court. The people he has as witnesses are in his payroll. His team has not filed one sworn testimony. Their defense is TMZ. Amber’s lawyers can easily discredit his witnesses.

  2. Nicole says:

    Would I want it? Yes. But again she would probably getting a LOT less if they went to court. Again it’s half during the marriage AFTER expenses. Depp didn’t make any huge movies while they are together so its strategic move by Team Amber.

    Depp and Heard need help. Depp is an abusive rage monster that needs in patient rehab and/or jail. Preferably jail but I’ll take instensive rehab and NO not those spa ones.
    Heard needs therapy not only because she has been physical in past relationships (not blaming her but those are the facts) but any DV victim I would recommend counseling.

    • K2 says:

      Pirates of the Carribbean is a pretty huge movie, no?

    • Snowflake says:

      How has she been physical in past relationships? Are you getting that from one incident at an airport where she supposedly grabbed her girlfriend’s arm?

      • Nicole says:

        Yep once is enough and I don’t believe the BS downplaying they tried to push esp after they were caught in a lie about how the cop was homophobic.

        Either way even discounting any prior relationship issues ANY DV victim needs therapy.

  3. Snowpea says:

    I read the story about the finger in the paint yesterday and that combined with the video has completely haunted me ever since. Especially how he strode around the house in hat and sunglasses while drinking red wine in the morning – who even does that?

    Depp’s overriding air of menacing violence would have been absolutely terrifying to live with. I haven’t had a dog in this fight at all until now but suddenly I’m hoping Heard is safe and protected from this violent, abusive narcissist.

    This story just keeps getting worse.

    • Loopy says:

      She was still his fiancé when this took place, why the hell did she not ran for the hills???

      • MichLynn says:

        That’s what I don’t get. Why the f*ck did she marry him??

      • K2 says:

        He could well have persuaded her that he wouldn’t be jealous if she would just marry him because then her commitment would be clear. It’s not unusual in these situations, sadly. A lot of women have babies with abusers for the same reason, horribly. Amber is lucky she didn’t – Denise Richards had to hand her baby girls over to Charlie Sheen, unsupervised, in the early years. And Amber Heard would have looked like Halle Berry or Kelly Rutherford if she’d argued… at the beginning, anyway.

      • Snowflake says:

        Love.

      • LAK says:

        Not to mention his assistants gaslighting-romancing her, telling her he is a little boy lost who is crying and very sorry for X incident which won’t happen again if only Amber stays to save him.

      • Naya says:

        I remember being here during this period. There were plenty of reports of her refusing to marry him and even leaving him a few times. Of course at the time, people kept claiming that she had “glamoured” him into leaving his partner and falling off the wagon, and that she was only pretending to hesitate to give herself more emotional leverage over poor Johnny. Just think that this is what she was actually living through.

        As for why people stay with abusers; she thought last time would be the last time, she was in love, people around her normalized the behavior, she thought she deserved it, she thought she had to stay and help him, she thought she was tough enough to look past it, she thought the advantages out weighed the disadvantages. I dont think it matters why she stayed except for her own personal growth. In other words, her reasons are none of our business but his actions are.

      • Mich says:

        Early on in this story, a series of texts became public showing the kind of pressure she got from his people to stay with him. It is easy to say “I would never” on the internet but real life doesn’t always work that way. Also too, hindsight is 20/20. I have no doubt that Depp is like most abusers and (initially) acted like he was devastated by his own behavior, swearing that it would never happen again.

      • Wren says:

        That is the sensible approach, but unfortunately when you’re in the middle of such a mess it’s also not at all obvious. As everyone likes to forget, it wasn’t ALL bad times. This man is professionally charming, he knows how to make an emotional plea. He knows exactly the right notes to hit. We don’t know what he said to her, or promised her to entice her to marry him. All his minions were also in on it, convincing her, pushing her, downplaying the bad parts. When everyone around you is telling you it’s raining, even when you see sunlight, you start to think you’re crazy.

        By all accounts she did try to leave and not actually marry him. At the time it was spun as her stringing him along, being evasive, toying with poor sensitive Johnny’s heart.

      • BrooklynTam says:

        Well even Nicole Simpson married OJ Simpson after years of abuse.She left him multiple times and called the cops multiple times too.And Rhianna stayed with Chris Brown after he pummeled her face then they broke up but got back together 3 years later! Domestic Violence isn’t that easy to explain. I used to be one of those people who’d say “Just leave!” But I’m learning over the years that it doesn’t work that way.And Amber’s lawyer did say that she left him multiple times. He probably promised that it’d never happen again and she believed it.I was watching 20/20 a few weeks ago and they said that women leave their abusers 7 times before they leave for good. And that was just the average!

    • honestperson says:

      As some one who has gone through a similar situation all i can say is there is a cycle of abuse so there is abuse then honeymoon period then abuse so the victim stays because by the time next abuse happens he/she forgets the last time.with each cycle abuse keeps getting worse,but I think there comes a time with everyone where they actually realize whats happening.Or may be e.g they spent some time with normal people?. for me personally it was 4 years,now i cant believe i stayed for so long and i m educated.I have met people who stayed for 20 years before realizing it was that bad.
      For victims of abuse when the abuser comes and says sorry and act like they get it and then they may have physical and emotional connection ,since your emotions are so heightened the physical relation you have afterwards may be addictive.That causes trauma bonding ,thats why even Rhianna esque battered women stay.

  4. Maya says:

    Even if she did have an affair – that does not excuse violence.

    Depp needs to be in jail for domestic violence.

    • Belb says:

      She could have a permanent restraining order against him if she wins in court, but he won’t go to jail. Anger management is more likely.

    • Ronaldinhio says:

      This 100 times this – the she made him angle
      Now they are trying to turn the story into “poor Depp, that scheming Heard was farking around on him”
      Even if she slept with the entire West Coast he does not have any right to threaten, intimidate, demean, bully slander or physically or mentally harm her in any way. No one goads you into being abusive you simply are. The first step in learning to get better is taking responsibility and there is zero chance of him doing so with so many enablers around him making endless excuses for him
      Sadly the same goes for Heard walking away unscathed – there will always be a tiny part of her that believes the shit he has said and thinks that if she behaved a little differently or loved a little harder she could have healed him
      I hate this – it goes on and on and on everywhere. On a positive note she has escaped with her life and that is a great deal more than many. That is just so bleak

    • Nicole says:

      Nothing excuses it. I don’t care if she cursed you out every which way from Sunday

  5. Who ARE these people? says:

    Would appreciate a legal recap especially on the divorce case vs the abuse claims.

    And of course jealousy fits the profile of abusive men. Pretty much everything about Depp fits the profile of abusive men, with the additional contributions of alcohol and other drug abuse.

    • Lindsay says:

      They are one and the same. These depositions are for the divorce and restraining order. It will all play out in civil court now and he won’t face criminal charges for anything up to this point.

      • Who ARE These People? says:

        Thanks. Do you know … if a settlement is not reached, will it then default to a court case (which could be closed or open, and given the public interest, closed might as well be open)?

        I would think she not only wants acknowledgement to validate her story, but to counteract the widespread slander about her character and intentions.

      • Lindsay says:

        If she gets a permanent restraining order that makes a pretty public statement about the amount of proof she had. Also a judge would file sanctions against her if she were to make them rule over false claims. No matter what that would be public also a NDA is not something a judge can compell you to sign to get a divorce so she could write a tell all and do interviews once the divorce was finalized.

        Divorce trials in CA are open.

        He wants to bury this with a non disclosure agreement and she wants more money than she is legally entitled to so I bet they settle.

  6. greenmonster says:

    I don’t know why I still make the same mistake over and over again and go over to TMZ AND read their comment section… it just leaves me hopeless for humanity every single time.

    People over their are still protecting Johnny Depp and even spinning this story as if Amber is putting Billy Bob’s marriage in danger, because of something that only happened in Johnny’s mind. I just don’t get it. What else do they need? Get over it, your former teenage heartthrob and/or favorite actor is a POS. It will not end your life to finally acknowledge that.

  7. Ninks says:

    I can’t imagine how they will settle. There’s no way that Johnny Depp is going to admit to DV, and there’s no way she’s going to settle without some sort of admission because without it. If she settles without some sort of admission on his part, her career is over and she will spend the rest of her life being accused of making these stories up to extort him.

  8. Betti says:

    Depp has lost control f the narrative that he and his team have tried to spin. Regardless of who is leaking Ambers evidence it’s not making him look good. Either it’s someone from the court house or someone in adepts team.

    Poor bills Bob, being dragged by Depp like this. Depp needs to just go away but he’s obsessed with ruining her.

  9. saltandpepper says:

    Point is they were toxic to each other. Extremely damaged. Both of them. Agree with an earlier post, they need therapy, years of therapy.

    • Naya says:

      I’m sorry but no. There’s no shared responsibility here. I know Depp fan girls are in a difficult position now that they can no longer deny what was obvious to everyone else- that he is not just crazy but dangerous, but they don’t get to draw an equivalence between him and his victim. HE is a toxic little twerp who needs to be removed from society either by the penal system or by the mental health system. SHE is an abused individual who needs to understand her value and pick healthier relationships. Their “damage” is no where near the same.

      • Roxane says:

        Naya@ Depp’s fangirls are trying really hard to sell this “toxic-relationship” nonsense.

      • saltandpepper says:

        Not a fan girl at all. Can’t stand the man, but I’m not oblivious that it takes two to tango and that their whole relationship seemed to be based on anger issues from his side and her defending herself. I don’t remember taking sides.

      • Naya says:

        No again. Domestic abuse is not a sexy Argentinian dance, its one human being terrorising another. By necessity that requires overriding their will. HE has anger issues and is toxic and crazy. She is none of these things. The abused does not share responsibility with the abuser. It does not take two.

      • Original T.C. says:

        @Naya
        X10000000

      • Tiffany :) says:

        Well said, Naya!

    • Ronaldinhio says:

      This is just nonsense.
      People saying things like this to and about survivors of DVA are downright dangerous

    • Who ARE These People? says:

      He’s had years to get therapy for his problems with addiction, relationship violence, and self-harm. Clearly he hasn’t gotten help.

      If she needs therapy to help restore her sense of safety and personal power after years of living with an abusive, controlling alcoholic, that’s an entirely separate issue.

      Calling abusive relationships “toxic” is pure bullshit. In abusive relationships, the abuser has the power.

    • Who ARE These People? says:

      No, it does NOT take “two to tango.” It only takes one to bully, gaslight, control, threaten, hit, kick and slander. This is not a tango and not a dance and not anything catchy or cute. It’s an ugly reality for too many people in relationships, and most of them happen to women.

      He doesn’t have “anger issues,” he is angry, abusive and addicted.

      And if she defends herself — well, duh. But that’s not her part in some kind of dance. That’s not a role that she plays. That’s survival.

      • silliness says:

        Agreeing with so many of the comments on this thread, but especially yours because you are pointing out what others try to say to turn it into a “mutually abusive” relationship rather than what it is: one person has the power and control, the other one is going to defend herself or himself to survive sometimes.

    • Bobo says:

      You’re only right about one thing – Amber WILL need years of therapy to move on from this.

  10. BritAfrica says:

    All this is awful for her but she should hang in there. Easier said than done I know, but she must not sign that NDA.

    Once she does, everything that happened to her will melt away like it never happened. And in a few years time it will be regarded as an urban myth. ‘Oh…he used to drink back then, he’s not like that now’…etc…etc…

  11. K2 says:

    So much for her being a gold-digger. She’s willing to settle for a relatively low sum as long as he admits to a single event. Lord knows she has evidence of a great deal worse, to anyone with the wit to believe their own eyes and ears.

    • Brittney B. says:

      K2, sadly I’m sure the 8 million figure will still look like a lot to the people who want to paint her that way. Never mind his hundreds of millions; *they* don’t have any millions! How dare a lying cheating hussy expect multiple millions?!

      /s

    • Annie says:

      “Relatively low sum”? Let’s remember that she never had much of a career by Hollywood standards and that she has to keep sustaining lifestyle she can’t afford. If she made max 250k/year (it was in papers somewhere), $8mil is still 16 yrs of annual earnings!

      • Who ARE These People? says:

        And if she’s entitled to it by law, and there are damages on top due to years of abuse followed by this year’s smear campaign to attack her good name and damage her career, good. She might need that 16 years of earnings.

      • Lindsay says:

        That would be a second civil case she would have to bring because it is a no fault divorce the court can’t compensate her for pain and suffering or other damages. Unless she can prove the injuries she sustained during the marriage kept her from working then she may get partially compensated for that.

      • alex says:

        but she’s NOT entitled to it by law its a divorce case. She entitled to less by CA state law. Now if she brought charges or a separate civil case then she could get a bigger settlement stemming from the abuse. If they let it go to court the he said/she said would play out, the judge would make a decision and chances are she would get a lot less since its a no fault state and she only gets half of what they earned during their short marriage

      • Who ARE These People? says:

        Will she get half his earnings (after expenses) during the marriage no matter what?

        Is that the baseline?

      • alex says:

        yes no matter what. if they go to trial that’s what she will get basically. Its a no fault state so that’s all she’s entitled to

      • Lindsay says:

        The only thing abuse allegations would effect is a permanent restraining order and would factor in heavily with custody arrangements but that doesn’t apply to them. In a no fault divorce there is no financial penalty for being a bad spouse or financial reward for being a good one.

        The only thing that would change the baseline in CA is if there is an enforceable pre-nup or post-nup, a privately agreed upon settlement between the two parties, or hitting the magic ten year mark. If you’re married a decade or more then whatever assets and debts are split 50/50.

      • Who ARE These People? says:

        So (thanks folks), if they go to trial, she’ll get half and doesn’t have to sign any kind of non-disclosure agreement as part of a settlement.

        If they settle, she may or may not sign an NDA as part of the settlement, which presumably would give her more money than that half.

        So far they’ve said she won’t sign an NDA (and I hope she doesn’t).

        It seems at this point he can try to throw money at her but if it’s true that she won’t sign an NDA (and is not only using it as a bargaining chip), it will go to trial.

        If she is willing to sign an NDA in exchange for a more generous settlement, few reasonable people would blame her, but it will damage her claims of DV.

        Meanwhile, the permanent restraining order – separate issue?

  12. Merchant Smearer says:

    Miles and miles of garbage. Why waste even more energy on it? Were I in either one of their shoes, I’d cut out as soon as possible. Reading this has made me sick, and I have to see a lawyer later today.

  13. Ariel says:

    The larger issue of a public statement is so important. The terrible crime of domestic violence stays in the shadows, it’s too terrible to admit to. Yet, if not acknowledged, the abuser keeps abusing women over and over.

    We don’t jail abusers enough, and we’re not going to execute them, so that leaves getting them help (assuming they don’t want to be monsters).

    The first step to getting help is admitting there is a problem.

    Also, I hope Disney loses millions while they continue to enable their bloated rage monster.

    • Merchant Smearer says:

      “Also, I hope Disney loses millions while they continue to enable their bloated rage monster.”

      Disney is partly responsible by keeping the lights on in this sordid mess. 2014: “We have Jack Sparrow and we’re never letting him go.” 2016: They said this would all blow over, that they stand by Depp, come hell or high water. Disney is disgusting. So much for those fairy tales they can’t get enough of.

      • Who ARE These People? says:

        If they are willing to mistreat children, why would they care about grown women?

      • Tiny Martian says:

        Disney doesn’t exactly depict women in a flattering way, do they? They’ve made their efforts in the past few years, but for the most part Disney women are all presented as either Barbie dolls or monsters.

      • nicegirl says:

        Jack Sparrow could be re-cast.

        It’s a dude in a pirate costume, wearing tons of makeup, with lines from a script.

        Shoot, it could even be Jackie Sparrow. Put a girl in it.

  14. Ellie says:

    Finally a new lawyer. Her lawyers are awful and she needed a better crisis PR team badly.

  15. LAK says:

    Man, that Billy Bob must have sexual charisma off the charts. All the boys and girls are fighting about him!!!

    • Who ARE These People? says:

      I know, right? Of all the Hollywood hotties his beautiful young wife could cheat on him with … she picks a 61-year-old Billy Bob? That, ladies and gentlemen, shows just how much the booze and drugs have addled the delusional mind of Johnny Depp.

  16. Artemis says:

    I’d like to think that if I was in such a situation as a famous person, I would do everything to rack up the evidence and slowly release everything to force a massive settlement. You bet I would be digging for gold, a woman can’t win anyway so why not ensure your future? That’s the smart thing to do.

    Amber is never even going to get close to the B-list thanks to Depp, she needs money. Hollywood doesn’t play nice, that’s proven again with this case. They don’t care about the truth, they’re protecting the money which is Johnny.

    • Who ARE These People? says:

      The tiny sliver of a silver lining is that it’s Johnny today and not Johnny 10 or 15 years ago…there’s less money to protect.

    • Rocío says:

      I really hope Aquaman proves to be a huge box office success and gets lots of sequels for her to star. She might not be the best actress out there, but she’s as good as many of the IT starlets and prettier.

      • nicole says:

        okay I feel bad for Heard but no she’s a terrible actress and not even in the same ballpark as any of the IT girls of the moment.

      • silliness says:

        I recently did a marathon of her stuff, and she’s not terrible, actually. She’s pretty good in a few things. And then admittedly a couple of things she was very meh. But I also hope things go well for her with Aquaman and after. She’s been a working actress for a decade now, which is more than most actors can say. She’s got enough chops to keep it going.

  17. Rocío says:

    I hope she gets a big chunk of money….but I still fear for her safety. Before the divorce drama began, there were reports that connected JD with the disappearance (death?) of some guy who owed him money or something like that. Next to JD, Tom Cruise looks like the Pope.

  18. Krakken says:

    I think that the ONLY thing that could possibly redeem JD would be if he were to cop to this. Release a statement and admit to all this dysfunctional shit.
    This will never happen I am sure but personally speaking, I have too much disgust for him to ever watch another film or production he is associated with ever again.
    The only thing that would change that would be some humility and truth telling. But as someone pointed out earlier it would probably be some bulls**t production like the Austrailian dog smuggling apology.
    Just. Tell. The. Truth. Radical concept no?
    Scarfy sadly lacks the stones to do something so edgy and radical as being humble and honest.

    • Who ARE These People? says:

      If he’s delusional enough to think she’d sleep with Billy Bob, he’s delusional enough to think his behavior’s been justified, and his actions are those of someone who is delusional, defensive and probably drunk.

    • silliness says:

      I feel the same way @Krakken. But he’s not, because he’s got enablers surrounding him. Plus, even with all this evidence, why would HE and his self-importance implicate himself in such a way?

  19. Who ARE These People? says:

    Update, TMZ says they settled. Have a look. She got $, there’s no way to know about an NDA, and the wording helps him save face. Lawyers may have said, “This is as good as it’s going to get.” I hope she never has to see him again. He’ll spiral down. And women have been warned.

    As the request for a restraining order has been withdrawn, she may feel that once divorced and living apart from him, she’s not in danger any more.

    I hate it that a “volatile” (abusive) relationship has been characterized as “bound by love.” Always trying to placate and it feeds that “toxic relationship” narrative. But she’ll have her settlement and let’s hope she invests most of it wisely for her future.

    • stinky says:

      thx!

    • Sarah says:

      Even without an NDA, she may not be able to say much for fear of libel?
      Unless she does have actual evidence of him harming her, he could say it’s slander maybe?
      I completely believe she is telling the truth btw, just if she only has photos of damage and videos of him ranting and raving, it doesn’t prove abuse.

      It’d be amazing for her to do a tell-all but I don’t think she will.

      I want to go back and watch all her films now to support her!
      I saw one once…where they’re on holidays and her friend gets taken. I don’t remember her being bad at all.