Rami Malek didn’t want his Bond 25 villain to be a religious or ideological terrorist

91st Academy Awards (Oscars 2019)

I haven’t even kept up with all of the drama from the Bond 25 set, but every time I see a new headline, I become more convinced that A) the production is cursed and B) all of the drama will make a very good Vanity Fair article or perhaps even a Hollywood Reporter cover story at some point. Daniel Craig got injured in the first weeks of production, they’ve already had a million mishaps and delays, the production is already over budget and I simply don’t trust the screenwriters or director Cary Fukunaga anymore. But I’m strangely not worried at all at the choice of villain for Bond 25: they hired Rami Malek shortly after he won the Best Actor Oscar this year, and apparently Rami only had one request:

When Rami Malek was asked to play the villain in the ­latest 007 movie he had to think twice before ­accepting the role. Rami wanted a cast-iron guarantee from the film-makers first: he simply wanted an assurance from director Cary Fukunaga that the villain he would play would NOT be a religious fundamentalist or an Arabic-speaking terrorist.

Because Rami’s pride in his Egyptian heritage and culture is, he says “the fabric of who I am”.

“It’s a great character and I’m very excited,” explains Rami. “But that was one thing that I discussed with Cary. I said, ‘We cannot identify him with any act of terrorism reflecting an ideology or a religion. That’s not ­something I would entertain, so if that is why I am your choice then you can count me out’. But that was clearly not his vision. So he’s a very different kind of terrorist. It’s another extremely clever script from the people who have figured out exactly what people want in those movies. But I feel a substantial weight on my shoulders. I mean, Bond is ­something that we all grow up with.”

[From The Daily Mirror]

Rami is a first-generation American, and both of his parents were Egyptian émigrés. Rami was born in LA. Also: Rami and his family are Coptic Orthodox Christians, and they spoke Arabic at home. Which I didn’t know – I didn’t know that Rami speaks Arabic too. I’ve heard him talk about what it means to him to be Egyptian AND American though, and seriously – it was a good call that he cleared that up before he signed on to Bond 25. Weirdly, James Bond films are not really known for the most basic-bitch stereotypes when it comes to villains. I mean, you can still see and feel the thread of British colonialism in Bond movies, especially the older ones, but the villains are rarely “stock Arab terrorist” or “stock IRA dude” or “stock mustache-twirling Russian.”

91st Academy Awards (Oscars 2019)

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

11 Responses to “Rami Malek didn’t want his Bond 25 villain to be a religious or ideological terrorist”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Still_Sarah says:

    Alan Rickman was the “terrorist” villain in the first Die Hard movie – except he wasn’t really a terrorist. He was a bank robber pulling off a heist in a building (money, jewels, etc.) and thought he and his crew could buy time by pretending to be terrorists, so they take hostages and make demands, blah, blah, blah. It was really funny – it was Alan Rickman, of course.

    • BengalCat😻 says:

      Alan Rickman turned my 15 year old loins to jelly when I saw that movie.

      • Digital Unicorn says:

        Oh yeah, it got worse for me when he was playing Snape. I’d have taken Snape over James Potter any day! With Sirius a close 2nd.

    • Nanainwonderland says:

      @Still_Sarah I agree with your point. I actually think many hardline terrorists who claim to be strictly religious demonstrate some elements of bank-robber-mentality (Isis’ first move in Iraq was to, well,rob banks). I wish movies featured more characters like Hans Gruber and not one dimensional boring archetypes who shout and scream nonsense.

  2. Incredulous says:

    I’d laugh my ass off if he was playing the Milk Tray man.

  3. Dani says:

    I love Rami so much. He’s so talented. Coptic Egyptians have a really rough history and are a very small minority of Egyptians.

    • entine says:

      +1 It’s good to see him getting accolades. Him being an extremist in a movie when his community culture, religion and country (in general) have suffered because of extremism, could have been even dangerous at most, and insensitive at least.

  4. a says:

    From videos online of him speaking snippets of Arabic I don’t think he’s fluent, but he does understand – just like a lot of second gen POC immigrants. Our parents tended to make sure we spoke English first so we’d have a better chance at fitting in despite our skin color/names. But most of understand our “mother” languages perfectly well, because our older relatives speak it around us and at home, even if we can’t speak as well as we understand.

  5. Starkiller says:

    Still can’t believe they gave this guy an academy award. If by some bizarre chance there was anyone in the world who still took the AAs seriously or thought they were some sort of honour, this should remind them that it’s a joke.

  6. phlyfiremama says:

    Whatever other problems Bohemian Rhapsody had as a film, Rami totally nailed the role of Freddie Mercury. He absolutely deserved his Oscar win.