DM: Duchess Meghan can’t believe the palace response to Kate’s Tatler debacle

The Wimbledon Championships 2019

Historically, when the Daily Mail makes up a “unnamed friend” of the Duchess of Sussex, that “friend” is usually just a mouthpiece for whatever agenda the Mail is pushing that week. So it is with the Mail’s latest “exclusive,” which is a lengthy set of quotes from a friend who has a surprising amount to say about the Duchess of Cambridge’s Tatler interview and Kensington Palace’s asinine response to the very idea of Kate NOT being embiggened 24-7. You can read the Mail’s full piece here. Some highlights:

Meghan is mad because Kensington Palace defends Kate more than they ever stepped up for her: ‘Meghan said Kensington Palace never once came to her defense when she was being shredded by the media. Now Kate gets a bit of negative press, and the Palace comes out in less than 24 hours to rebuke the claims made against her. This is really a slap in the face for Harry because he repeatedly asked for an updated, revised media policy or at least a conversation about his concerns. All fell on deaf ears and then Kate comes along, snaps her fingers and gets an outpouring of support.’

This is why the Sussexes left: ‘Meghan says it’s just so telling. She explained this was one of the main reasons why she and Harry said their goodbyes to royal life… the lack of support and complete disregard for the pain and anguish Meghan suffered while being crucified by the media. Meghan said rather than backing her, she was made to feel like she was asking too much, expecting too much, when all she wanted was support from the powers that be.’

Kate was never supportive to Meghan: ‘Meghan said on her last trip to England, Kate barely said two words to her and that it’s absolutely preposterous for her to start playing the blame game. Of all the people in the royal family, Meghan said she had hoped to develop a close relationship with Kate, but was never given the chance. It was hurtful and disappointing for Meghan. Meghan said Kate never gave her the benefit of the doubt or reached out to her when she was at her lowest, struggling to adjust with very few friends. Had the roles been reversed, Meghan said she would have gone out of her way to make Kate feel part of the family. She would have embraced their sisterhood.’

Kate only has herself to blame: The friends said Meghan felt Kate ‘secretly envied Meghan’s ability to speak her mind and make her own happiness a priority. Meghan said Kate only has herself to blame for not setting limits and for not speaking up for herself.’

The wedding-tights drama: ‘First off, it was Meghan’s big day, not Kate’s and secondly Meghan was not about to make her god-kids, let alone the other little girls wear tights, it was too hot and sticky and there was just no need for it. Meghan said it really wasn’t an issue until Kate made it an issue.’

[From the Daily Mail]

Do I believe that an actual friend of Meghan, part of her inner circle, really spoke to the Daily Mail? Not really. But I applaud the Mail for getting the tone right – this IS how Meghan probably feels, in my opinion. Just like the juxtaposition between “how Prince Andrew was treated” versus “how the Sussexes were treated” was on display constantly over the last year, it’s downright hilarious to see the Cambridges’ tone-deaf response to Tatler’s bitchy-posh piece, versus their lack of response to the mountain of smears and racist abuse Meghan suffered through 2018 and 2019. And no, the Palace barely did anything. You know why? Because half of those smears were being run through Kensington Palace’s communications office. Guess who ordered them?

News

09-03-2020   Commonwealth Day Celebrations  Westminster Abbey 2020...

Photos courtesy of WENN, Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

157 Responses to “DM: Duchess Meghan can’t believe the palace response to Kate’s Tatler debacle”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Jess says:

    Why is kate’s tone deaf mediocrity being linked back to meghan? Every time they talk about kate, they always have to talk about meg.

    The power that meghan holds. My god.

    The relevance, the charisma, the talent.

    Their foundation is going to take all the attention away once it launches. Theyre not ready!

    • Bettyrose says:

      Yeah it’s pretty telling. There’s absolutely no reason for Meghan’s name to be mentioned here.

    • Molly says:

      Cheyenne Roundtree seems tasked with fanfiction about Meghan. Still hasn’t surpassed her long article about the Sussexes in Canada weeks after they had already left for California.

      • L4frimaire says:

        That writer of this article has been dragged so many times for her dishonest articles, even people from her alma mater were calling her out for her lack of journalistic ethics. It honestly looks like she is compiling quotes from what’s been floating around social media and in other news outlets and blogs on this matter. Don’t need Meghan’s friends for the glaring laughability of the Tatler article. The Fail will milk this for all it’s worth and try to use Meghan as a shield to get in what they really think, while pretending to cover for KP. Their usual sour minions can’t say their usual flowers and unicorn nonsense regarding Kate. It’s bizarro land.

    • Here for Harrys’ death glare in those pics. Love it. He will fight anyone to protect his family.

  2. Emily says:

    The shift in tone towards Kate lately has been so weird. Are the daily updates on Tyler Perry’s house not generating as many clicks as they used to, or is something else going on here?

    • Jess says:

      They really shot themselves on the foot. The moment the royal rota wasnt getting any information from their camp, they turned on the kevin and karen. The DM turned around real quick.

    • Jen says:

      I think this is exactly it. They started treating Kate with kid gloves when they could abuse Meghan and use their exultation of Kate against Meghan, but now that Meghan isn’t providing them much content, they have to go to Plan B.

    • Talie says:

      The british tabloid media is a beast that needs to be fed constantly. Meghan and Harry removed themselves and now it’s harder for tabs to connect any dots to them for every story like they used to. William and Kate are the most obvious marks considering they command so much public attention. They can’t keep churning out positive stories forever.

      By stating plainly that they are done with any collaboration with the tabloids, meghan and harry have slowly and effectively gotten out of that toxic cycle the royals can’t/won’t give up.

      • Nyro says:

        Their statement declaring that they would no longer engage the tabloids, not even for simple confirmation of denial of stories, looks more and more brilliant everyday.

    • Becks1 says:

      My guess is the Tatler article and the responses to it got a LOT of attention, probably more attention/clicks than the standard “will and kate are the future! they’re perfect!” articles the DM et al was running for the past two years – so the press will pivot accordingly.

    • L4frimaire says:

      I think the Middletons were flexing a bit too much after Sussexit and it was annoying too many people who care about these things. They were probably envisioning seeing Carol and Pippa swanning about the palace thinking they are kingmakers and it pissed someone off. Also, James Middleton got such an epic drag today. My god, there is a lot of anger toward that family on both sides. Pissing off both the monarchists and the squad. In the old days when royal brides married in as consorts, they basically has to renounce and forget their birth family to show allegiance to their new sovereign. Also, royal brides have always been pawns, props, and scapegoats. Meghan learned this real quick and decided it made no sense, especially given Harry’s place in line. Kate seems to have forgotten that in her obsession to tear down Meghan and prop up her peeps.

      • xo says:

        “Kate seems to have forgotten . . . ”

        No. William appears to be closer to the Middletons than he is to his own father. They have been included at his insistence.

  3. ABritGuest says:

    Ha ha at this fan fiction. This ‘friend’ is someone on Twitter again as seen these same conversations online.

    But yes the palace reaction to the Tatler article is a stark contrast to radio silence when Meghan is accused of eg funding terrorism with her cookbook project.

  4. Gingerbee says:

    Hmm, probably the Daily Fail’s the“source” is Celebitches posters.

    • Powermoonchrystal says:

      I vote this for comment of the week. So true

    • Izzy says:

      Ha, I guess we’re the new “my palace sources.”

    • Abby says:

      haha can I add that to my resume?

      • Noodle says:

        @abby, I think it could qualify as being published, which, in many lines of work, including mine, is prioritized.

      • VS says:

        @Abby and @Noodle ——- Bazinga!!! you won the day for me and it is only 9:53 in NYC

      • Noodle says:

        @vs, I’ll just have to be careful about reporting the timing of my “research”, because some of my most promising Celebitchy commentary was performed while I was supposed to be tending to more important work meetings…

      • VS says:

        @Noodle — LOL; we will be quiet

    • Becks1 says:

      LOL, you could be right, they use twitter for sources all the time too.

    • TGosha says:

      And another source is the Sussex Squad. If you follow them on Twitter or listen to the podcast, every single point from this article was mentioned weeks ago. Verbatim.

    • indiesr says:

      hahahaha! You nailed it!

    • Bella says:

      That is exactly what I thought and it is probably correct!

  5. Awkward symphony says:

    This is total BS and definitely an attempt to attract none tabloids fanatics and sussexs supporters. It’s also similar to piss moran’s new strategy in how he’s backtracking his BULLYING of Meghan calling it “harsh criticism”😤 on GMB yesterday and saying it might’ve been part of his ignorance about black & minority struggles. Says the guy who went after her father and estranged relatives just because he didnt get wedding invit🤬These people are changing their tone because of current protests not because of sudden moral turmoil or guilt. It’s just a tactic to get clicks. Looking at the comments it’s clear they are still moderating their comments to only have negative posts which is again clue to how it’s all for clicks

    • Mary says:

      I did note that after a couple of weeks of PM being silent about the Sussexes, as soon as his contract with GMB was renewed he came out with a nasty piece about how irrelevant the Sussexes are. Connected?

      • Britt says:

        He’s just mad that his obvious attempts at trying to appeal and get a job in America failed. The problem with Piers Morgan is that He thinks he’s more important than he actually is. At the end of the day, he is the one who is truly irrelevant and he did that by his own actions. Now he’s stuck on a morning show that is losing ratings and gets him nowhere. That’s why he was obsessed with Meghan because she could get him access and connections because she was American. Yes, I do think he had feelings for her but once he realized that “connection” to her was getting him nothing, he went off the deep end. Meghan was supposed to be Diana 2.0 when it came to access for many of these reporters and editors.

      • Lady D says:

        Britt, your comment now has me wondering how many reporters and editors are having screaming fits all day? How many were salivating at the thought of the books they could write, the tours they could do as experts on her, and their general retirement plans based on destroying Meghan? I laugh at the thought that Meghan screwed so magnificently with their future plans without even trying, or even giving them a second thought.

  6. Ruby_Woo says:

    If it was any other paper (barring the Sun) I would have assumed that maybe one of Meghan’s friends spilled the tea. But Daily Mail? No way!

    Either they are just shit stirring; making some drama to get clicks… or they know what’s been going down behind closed doors and are spilling e.g. Kate never reaching out when Meghan was at her lowest, or Meghan prioritising her god children’s comfort (what a monster!).

    What is clear is that now with Meghan gone, the Palace are turning on the media and the media are turning on the Palace.

    • Ginger says:

      I think that as well. Since they were part of the smear campaign they might really know what happened in regards to the tights story and Kate not welcoming Meghan. The tone of this article is interesting.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      Since it is the DM, the alleged “friend” of Meghan is pure fiction. However, it is interesting to see how the narrative is suddenly changing and it makes me wonder why? Is it because vilifying Meghan isn’t as profitable anymore or is it because KP is now going after the media? Or is it simply because there’s no Sussex news and KP is continuing to keep this story in the news and they have already exhausted the “Meghan disregarded pRoTOcOl!” angle? Inquiring minds wants to know.

      • Becks1 says:

        @ArtHistorian this is basically what I said down below, but you are a lot clearer and more concise, LOL. The changing narrative IS very interesting.

      • Nic919 says:

        That’s what I find interesting too. Not the content of the article but the fact that they are directing barbs at Kate. That hasn’t happened since the work shy comments in early 2016.

      • notasugarhere says:

        Nic919, thank you for the news about Case. That’s yet another one of their high-level staff who have left in less than year. Less than six months really.

      • Lowrider says:

        The narrative has not changed. The article was not written by a royal reporter but a ow level gossip columnist. I do not believe the writer has any connections to the palace.

    • Mary says:

      Very good theory @Ruby!

    • February Pisces says:

      Every once in a while the media holds the Cambridge’s shit over a balcony and threatens to drop it. The Cambridge’s call their bluff, so they drop just one thing, just to show they will do it.

      I’ll expect maybe a pic of their kids, or a hit piece on Meghan or some other story will be provided to keep them fed. I think the Cambridge’s will be held hostage for life, but how much have they got left to give, money will run out, leaks will run dry, pics of their kids will get boring.

      We all know none of meghans friends spoke to them, but what they said seems pretty accurate, so maybe the media are shifting the blame onto the palace. They did that after Diana’s death to stop people being angry at them.

      • Roo says:

        @februarypisces, your first paragraph is wonderfully descriptive and on point! *chef’s kiss* That’s exactly what they do to the Cambridges. And I am not crying for them.

      • February Pisces says:

        Thank you @roo. X

  7. Ginger says:

    This article makes Meghan look good and very sympathetic towards her and makes Kate look like an entitled snob. The wheels are coming off with the Cambridge’s.

    I don’t believe DM articles but this is how I bet Meghan feels regarding the Tatler article and how Kate never welcomed Meghan.

    • Julie says:

      Here’s the thing; when I read the article, I absolutely agree with you. In the context of how she’s been treated by the RBF, her “complaints” were valid. I made the mistake of looking at the comments on the article and wow. Jesus. Those people just really, really, really want to hate Meghan. The top comments are just ignorant, cruel, and dismissive.

  8. Larry says:

    Considering that Harry and Meghan issued a statement declaring that they would not communicate with tabloids, including the DM, in any way, shape, or form, it is extremely unlikely that the DM have pulled this “friend” from anywhere else than their own arses.

  9. Ali says:

    Dailyfail is apparently just writing fan fiction now.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      They’ve been writing fiction for years.

      • FicklePickle says:

        Hell, the Irish people wrote an entire song about how well known the Daily Mail was for writing utter garbage a literal century ago.

      • Alarmjaguar says:

        Wait, what’s the name of the song? I must find it now.

    • BayTampaBay says:

      The Daily Fail pioneered fan ficction and that is all that is published on their online site.

    • VS says:

      just NOW? do you mean ALWAYS?
      No one from H&M circle talks to them………so every time I see DM + H&M, I KNOW it is fiction

  10. Love says:

    It’s pretty obvious the Fail is trolling through Sussex squad twitter interactions and possibly even reading this site and then making up “sources”, knowing they’re protected by the whole “we don’t disclose our sources” nonsense.

    Also interesting to see they don’t acknowledge their own complicity. This is obviously coming off the back of the #blacklivesmatter movement. People are starting to speak more about Meg’s treatment at the hands of the media, and I’ve noticed it getting a lot of attention on social media. They’re scared.

    Even Morgan is stealthily doing a back shuffle on some of his stances. We are not fooled. We see you racists!!!!!

    • L84Tea says:

      That’s the hilarious part. They are mentioning the abusive treatment Meghan has suffered from but don’t even acknowledge that they played a HUGE role in it. In fact, the DM were the absolute worst.

    • Amelie says:

      OH they are DEFINITELY changing their tone in the wake of the resurgence of protests for Black Lives Matter. As soon as the media moves on though, my guess is they’ll be back to shredding her to pieces. They realize it would not be smart to go after Meghan too much right now. Especially now that a resurfaced video from 2012 that Meghan made for a campaign called Erase the Hate is making the rounds, in which Meghan describes being biracial and an incident where her mom was called the N word. I’m not sure it’s enough to change the DM’s tone forever but I think they realized they’re playing with fire if they try to take her down.

      They can’t blame she made that video “for attention,” as it was from 2012, when most of the world had no idea who she was and she was still on Suits (I think).

  11. Erinn says:

    I still don’t understand either side (other than it obviously being Meghan’s choice on tights or no tights – it was HER wedding) of the tights thing. Is it THAT hot in May in the UK? I feel like the temperature isn’t that different from NS at that time of the year, but I could just be wrong. BUT – I wholeheartedly agree that the decision should be up to Meghan either way – I just always thought the argument for it being too warm was strange when she shouldn’t even HAVE to justify it in the first place. It should have been as simple as Meghan saying “I don’t want that aesthetic” and it being over with right then and there.

    I really don’t think Meghan’s friends had anything to say here. I think this is another case of the Fail making up story lines, and I’m not even sure that the tone is right here. Parts of it sure. But it still comes off… I don’t know. I don’t see Meghan or anyone who’s actually close to Meghan stating that KP didn’t stick up for her while in the same interview saying “well it was up to Kate to set limits”. I just don’t think Meghan would say that, and I do wonder if that’s a purposeful attempt to make her look hypocritical. I kind of wonder whether the source was a friend or even an acquaintance or if some overzealous fan embellished their relationship with her. At this point nothing would surprise me.

    At the end of the day, we all know how horrifyingly hypocritical the palaces have been about all of this. Not just the palaces, but the media, the reporters, the public, etc. I am glad that more and more people are seeing the hypocrisy, though.

    • Yoyo says:

      You do know this is the Dailyfail? They don’t need sources, they just make crap up.
      Why would any real friend of Meghan’s give info to a tabloid?

      • Erinn says:

        To quote my own post “I think this is another case of the Fail making up story lines” and “I do wonder if that’s a purposeful attempt to make her look hypocritical.”

        So yes, I do know that they’re full of shit. My point was that it’s not even believable despite not being a complete hit piece like usual.

    • jess says:

      The tights debacle was definitely about control and putting meghan in her place. it’s like what you said, drama over tights is just the dumbest thing, but they definitely felt threatened by her.

    • Becks1 says:

      It actually was pretty warm in the UK on the day of Meghan’s wedding (at least in Windsor) – someone here last week said they were there that day and it was hot, and I have a friend who was there (in the same hotel as Meghan lol) and she was posting that day about how warm it was – gorgeous, but warm.

      My guess is the tights were a last minute decision – they were probably waiting to see what the weather did – and Kate tried to make an issue about it just because.

      • Erinn says:

        I think that’s the most likely scenario. The tights were a ‘maybe’ at best, and because of the weather it was like ‘meh, lets not bother’ because May is one of those months that can easily go either way. We had an outlier day this week where we had a freaking windchill making it feel like 5C/41F. It’s JUNE. And I was freezing taking the dog out. A day like that would have benefited from an extra layer of warmth, I’m sure.

      • Humbugged says:

        There was months of hot weather that Spring/Summer that began in April and ran until August

      • Rebecca says:

        I arrived in England and spent my first night in Windsor about 2 weeks before the wedding. I swear, it was high 80s. I certainly wasn’t expecting that and I was a sweaty mess and scrambling to find lighter clothing before doing the Great Walk in the park.

    • Lena says:

      It was a warm day, but shortly before there had been a mini heatwave and there were articles speculating that it might get really hot, so tights probably would have felt hot to the kids and there was reason to believe that it could get really hot though in the end it was warm but not too hot. And yeah usually it doesn’t get hot in may but we don’t live in normal temperature days anymore due to climate warming.

    • Couch potato says:

      It can be really hot in May, and it was at the time of the wedding. If I remember correctly, some people had heat strokes, while waiting for the carriage ride.

    • MsIam says:

      I’m not sure why you think this article makes Meghan look hypocritical. Daily Fail “Meghan” was referring to Kate supposedly whining about feeling “trapped” and “overworked” in the Tatler article. *eyeroll*. She’s saying Kate should speak up for herself if she so unhappy. Fake Meghan in the article is saying KP should have gone to bat for Meghan with the media like they did for Kate. Maybe if they did then the Sussexes wouldn’t have left. However, since we know the KP agenda was to get them to leave that was not going to happen.

    • HeyJude says:

      Heat or not, tights are quite uncomfortable for kids that small. I absolutely hated them at that age when forced to wear them. And rarely did they go without getting a huge hole or run in them just from being an squirmy little kid.

      It makes perfect sense to ax the tights to most any reasonable person.

    • xo says:

      Tights.

      IDK. I see Kate as the consummate rule-follower & royal protocol IS a thing. I can see Kate thinking tightless children would be the end of the world & it having nothing to do with putting Meghan “in her place.”

      • Dilettante says:

        How does this theory explain the flashing and refusal to put weights in her hems until there was no one left who hadn’t seen her bits?

  12. Priscila Bezerra-Fischer says:

    Twofold reason for the sudden change in tone: They are testing the waters. They read some comments elsewhere, wrote their fanfiction, and now will be waiting to see if it generates interest.

    Second, they are reading the room. Cambridges do not have the numbers to back up their narrative and people are noticing it. If Tatler not only notices but makes fun of them, DM is also allowed to take of the baby gloves and start roasting them. It is also more content: run some negative pieces, receive their rebuttals, have their mouthpieces speak- it generates clicks.

    Maybe- just maybe- they are paving the way for a truce? The lawsuit might not go their way and now that Cambridges are sending the lawyers with more frequency, they want things to go back to normal- or else.

    Something also tells me Charles has something to do with it…

    • Mary says:

      Well, if it is about clicks…I was shocked to see that it had about 10,000 comments yesterday evening. Bots or not, there was a lot of “interest” in the article!

    • Tessa says:

      I hope Charles is behind this. I really really do.

      • Priscila Bezerra-Fischer says:

        I mean, it does make sense. Charles knows his sons. He has to defer to his Mother for reasons, and the way she deals with such things is by bribing William into doing more, but Charles knows. His bio silently tried to place William into his place by leaking he was ” grand. and Charles has surviving this narrative of ” King William and Power Behind the Throne Carole” for a long time. Now it got to a point where tevery second day there was a hagiography on William leaking and Charles was just working and then sick and then working again.

        So, yes, I think Charles style does not directly go into conflict with William. Did he not leake to the Press he was not seeing enough of his grandkids? Maybe the endgame for Charles is intoduce some sort of truce to Meghan and Harry and quietly negotiate with them as William image disintegrate. If this continue, Charles can go to the Queen and say it is not working, they need Harry to pick up some work, let´s all try to work things out, please?

  13. Yoyo says:

    Please, the Dailyfail actually think Meghan really cares about what is going on in England beyond her Charities.
    Meghan and Harry know they can’t trust many people, beyond the five friends comments in People magazine, none of the people she trusts are going to the Dailyfail to discuss Meghan.
    Look at Meghan’s actions, in the last four years or before, they’re no reports of her being a mean girl.
    The Dailyfail knows that can write what ever they want because the Sussexes are not going to reply.

  14. Izzy says:

    Dear Daily Mail:

    While I am slightly amused that you are now using CB as your Sussex sources, I am far less delighted that you are trying to whitewash your racist complicity, even participation, in the smearing of Duchess Meghan. Particularly now. Read the room. I am guessing others here feel similarly. Kindly sod off.

    Sincerely,
    This Celebitch

    • Mary says:

      +1000!

    • morrigan01 says:

      +1000!

      Also, someone should tell the Mail and other UK tabs and their reporters that the internet is forever. Deleting articles, deleting tweets, don’t make them just magically go away. The Sussex Squad have been saving your racist s*** wrt Meghan for at least 3 years now.

      You aren’t whitewashing this one guys. You’ve already exposed yourselves.

    • February Pisces says:

      Well we can all consider ourselves meghans friends, even though she doesn’t know us. Lol

  15. Yuzu says:

    It looks like it’s not cool to be as racist as Donald Trump anymore because that man is and has always been frothing-at-the-mouth deranged. Piers is reading the room and doesn’t want to be associated with the Orange Dictator. The Daily Mail seems to be doing the same thing because riots and protests are good for the separate businesses of their investors. Don’t want to catch yourself on the wrong side of history.

    But guess what? Too late. We see you.

  16. lizardqueen says:

    Aren’t the Sussexes in a court battle with the DM at the moment? Why would anyone who knows anything about the couple go to them? Probably all made up in Kensington Palace to stir readers up against Meg again and get the focus off the Cambridge’s laziness. If they can all unify to hate the Black woman then Karen Keen will be the golden child once more.

    • kacy says:

      How much could some of the former Sussex staff that now work at KP be behind this?

  17. Digital Unicorn says:

    This is a warning to Cain and Unable – give us access and stories or we will embiggen Meghan and pull down Duchess Lazy Mean Girl. I did say that the Tatler story would serve as a starting point for the other tabs to pile on and it has begun.

    It’s only a matter of time before we get the real story behind what went on in KP.

    • Lowrider says:

      It’s not a warning. The writer has no connections to the palaces. Look at Richard Kay and Emily Andrews last articles to see the palace talking points; Harry is fragile, Megan is a demanding diva and the poor put out saintly Cambridge’s are trying to do their best.

      • L4frimaire says:

        Nothing has changed. They still hate Meghan, disregard Harry, and think the Cambridge’s are just so under appreciated and never put a foot wrong, even when it’s in their own mouth. They just wanted some clicks and get their mob to attack Meghan again because their little snowflake at KP is upset the posh poodles aren’t her BFFs. Meghan’s “ friends” quoted are the internet since the Sussexes have ghosted the Fail. They still want people to feel sorry for the Cambridge’s at the expense of the upstart biracial American.

  18. Britt says:

    There are multiple things going on right now. The British Media is jumping on the Black Lives Matter because they’re trying very hard to wash the stain of the abuse they put not only Meghan through but Raheem Sterling, Stormzy, Dave, Windrush and the multiple immigrants they targeted. I also sense that they’re slowly trying to get Harry and Meghan back somehow because they are realizing that the Cambridge’s were the wrong bet. I think that’s why Richard Dennen turned on Kate because Meghan is a bigger brighter star despite his disgusting stories and jibes about her. Also like someone said above, the media is not so subtlety throwing the Royal family under the bus because they did treat her horribly and briefed against her. Once Harry and Meghan start their foundation and prove they’ll be fine and succeed without the BM and that family is when we will see the real fury. What’s apparent is that the media and RF need Harry and Meghan and William and Kate are realizing that the coasting and blame game is drying up.

    • Ruby_Woo says:

      I live in the UK and the way that the BM have done a 360 on ‘race debates’ is just wow! I do not believe for a second that they actually have had a change of heart – this is all down to business and spewing hate is not financial rewarding in the current climate. I think also they are well aware of the accusations against them and how bad they look internationally.

      There were so many RRs including Dan Wootton himself commenting on how the Sussexes may be ‘sad’ and ‘lost’ being away from the UK and the Royals. One of the RRs actually gave them 9 months to come back. And he said ‘if they don’t come together, he (Harry) will definitely come back (by himself).

      Once their one year review is up and Harry hasn’t magically returned without his baby and wife… that’s when things are going to get really interesting…

      • Britt says:

        I think they stopped with that one year review in the press because when Harry and Meghan released that statement about barring those four tabloids for life, that means that if they moved back to England and were near those courtiers and relatives, all their business would be leaked. That media know they aren’t coming back. I think they’re hoping to butter them up in that time with somewhat timid coverage or hoping the royal can convince them somehow.

    • morrigan01 says:

      The British Media is simultaneously trying to look down their noses at the USA for our racism, while *also* whitewashing their own racism, including towards Meghan, Sterling, Stormzy and the other people and issues you noted.

      I don’t know if any Americans are buying it (since we in the USA are *quite aware* of British Colonialism and what it meant, not just here but worldwide, for a start wrt native populations, particularly in Africa), but I see a lot of Brits on twitter buying into the narrative, and still defending the same racist microaggressive things that have been said and done to all those same people as not being racist.

      UK, the denial in your country about racism – especially systemic racism – is *deep.*

  19. Becks1 says:

    So OF COURSE the DM doesn’t have quotes from a friend of Meghan’s, unless someone like Emily Andrews is playing the role of “friend.”

    Still, this article is interesting because its things we have been saying for months/years, and it is calling out KP for not supporting Meghan but rushing to Kate’s defense, even its doing it in a “Meghan’s friend says….” kind of way. And it really makes Kate look bad – like she was insecure, obnoxious about the tights, mean and not welcoming to Meghan, etc.

    so its not that these quotes are actual quotes from someone close to Meghan, because we all know they aren’t, but its that the DM is actually taking this angle to the whole debacle and making a very big point about the difference between Kate and Meghan.

    • Mary says:

      It is interesting that this comes out shortly after Emily Andrews becomes the Mail on Sundays Royal Editor! She was in with Omid Scobie at the beginning. Maybe she does know some of what Kate was up to.

  20. Lex says:

    Lololloll I mean, it’s so obviously fake. An American would never say preposterous, first of all.

    • Jaded says:

      – Predictions are preposterous.
      Jackie Mason

      – I wanted to be president of the United States. I really did. The older I get, the less preposterous the idea seems.
      Alec Baldwin

      – Well, every now and then I would hear the preposterous notion that that Jane Pauley sounds like Barbara Walters. Like I could if I tried?
      Jane Pauley

      – Closure is a preposterous concept worthy of the worst aspects of American daytime TV. James Ellroy

      All Americans.

    • David says:

      That’s preposterous. I use preposterous all the time.

  21. Harper says:

    My favorite made-up quote in the article is that Kate envies Meghan’s ability to prioritize her own happiness. Combine that with the Tatler source saying Kate feels trapped then I think the real truth behind the Cambridges’ marriage is starting to trickle out.

    • Becks1 says:

      that was an interesting “quote,” wasn’t it? I thought Kate was happy and didn’t feel trapped and loved her life and understood her duty, etc. I agree that I think we are going to start seeing the truth trickle out.

    • Britt says:

      That is interesting. Meghan has the full protection and devotion of her husband. Harry’s protectiveness of Meghan and Archie and the love he has for them is palpable. I can see why she would be jealous because William seems very disconnected and unromantic.

    • Ginger says:

      Yeah, that was interesting. Did you see the latest Zoom meeting Will and Kate did? It was yesterday and Kate looked close to tears and seemed so sad. Very telling.

  22. lanne says:

    Royals better start reading the room. People keep receipts. The world sees how the U.K. media treated Meghan and the way the royal family did NOTHING to stop it, even when she was pregnant. White people are finally starting to open their eyes to racism. The Cambridge’s are morons for responding to Tatlers article after being silent about the sussexes. This is after Williams “jokes” about corona virus, and we have royal foundation audits coming up. Now even the tabloids are jumping in and noting the hypocrisy they themselves created in embiggening Kate and vilifying Meghan. Do they have any competent publicists? Do they think they can just pimp out their kids now? More and more, they look weak, useless, small, and petty. And Brexit looms ahead. The world loves seeing privileged people fall off of pedestals.

    I can’t help but think what a wonderful symbol it would have been, had Meghan been accepted in the family. Had they stood together as a united front. The royal family could have been something to look up to. A Meghan Kate partnership could have ushered in a new era. Imagine if they had been able, now, to have discussions about racial inequality. If they had pushed back on the “there can only be one princess” narrative and stood up for women. They would have been able to carve a new path together. Meghan is smart enough to see the value of that. Hell, Kate still has the upper hand because she’s married to the heir.

    Racism makes people stupid. Inertia makes royals stupid. Nicholas Romanov was a terrible absolute czar. He would have been as reasonably decent a constitutional monarch as his cousin George 5. He and his idiot wife squandered their own lives and the lives of 5 children because they refused to read the room in Russia and compromise. That what superiority complexes and racism give you. They are vicious masters. People will sacrifice their lives, their livelihoods, and their children’s lives on the altar of racial superiority. It won’t cost their lives, but the British royal family will sacrifice their own monarchy on the same altar.

    • betsyh says:

      lanne: This is a powerfully written post. The second paragraph made me tear up and I’m not an emotional person.

    • Harla says:

      Bravo Ianne!! Bravo!!

    • Giddy says:

      Thank you!

    • February Pisces says:

      I think the royals especially the Cambridge’s would rather alter the press narrative that read the room. I agree with everything you said. For the Cambridge’s it’s easier to get the press to write over the top gushing articles, and they manipulate and manufacture the comments section to favour them. That’s the problem, a majority of their popularity is manufactured by bot and doesn’t really exist. And of those who are fans, they are pretty much racists and old ladies. On twitter I see about 90% of the comments in favour of Meghan. Even Cambridge’s stans know they are behind the smears, they just hate Meghan so much they welcome it. Eventually that hate will fade one day, but the memory of what they did won’t. The royal family can cover up today’s news but they can’t change history. Meghans treatment will forever been remembered as segregation. All history will remember is how a biracial woman joined the royal family and made her life a living hell. The minor details which the press picked on her for such as nail polish, avacardos, etc will look silly in time.

      They thought that the more they excluded Meghan, the better they will look. Meghan is on the right side of history, William and Kate will be remembered as the villains here.

      • HK9 says:

        Firstly, you actually have to know that you need to read the room. Karen & Kevin, think they don’t have to do all that because they’re above every one else. Karen may have got her man and her crown, but her petty little mind has never been intelligent enough to grasp any of these concepts and how vital being on the right side of history will make the future for her and her children more secure. She doesn’t think that way and never will. Her ‘slip is showing’ as they say, and people may choose to forgive, but I for one will never forget.

      • February Pisces says:

        Meghan and Harry have had literally 95% negative news coverage over the last 3 years and yet somehow the ‘Sussex’s squad’ was formed. The Cambridge’s have had literally 99.99% positive news coverage of the last 3 years and somehow managed to lose half their fan base as a result. I think the Cambridge’s are baffled how the Sussex squad is so strong and yet they still push the same news stories because they seem to think it actually works. They know we know what they are and that all the negative Sussex coverage comes from them, and they still proceed. The only thing I can think of is that they are trying to survive day to day and have not thought about the future or their legacy.

    • Bibi says:

      @Lanne

      👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

    • L4frimaire says:

      Thank you 💯! That is an epic and amazing read.

    • kacy says:

      @Lanne – I agree, I have also been thinking the reason that potentially Kate resisted bonding with Meghan is because she so craves to be accepted by the Toffs. She did not want association with Meghan to weaken her already threadbare ties. Sadly, she just doesn’t realize she will never be accepted and should have formed a powerful alliance outside of them.

  23. morrigan01 says:

    It is straight up fanfiction that this is from Meghan and her camp. Meghan nor any friends of her’s are talking to the Daily Mail about anything. Period.

    That being said . . . it’s clear the Daily Mail are starting to turn their sights on Kate. Not because they suddenly like Meghan at all, oh no. However, Meghan’s gone and can’t be a daily punching bag for them like she used to be. Someone has to fill that space so they can have more regular things to write and clickbait about, and I suspect “Mean Girl Kate” is as good of a thing as any.

    Because, let’s face it, Kate being a Mean Girl isn’t all that far from the truth wrt her, given a lot of her actions that have been talked about for years now. There is stuff here that reads more like stuff people in the know *know* are true, or has been said before, about Kate – in whispers, or when RRs would sometimes let their masks slip on twitter and such, and would give the game away about who was behind the Meghan smear campaign and why.

    And let me just say, don’t ANYONE think Meghan should put out a statement wrt this nonsense article to deny it and save Kate in some way wrt to it. Meghan and Harry have already made it clear they aren’t engaging with the UK Tabs. (And wouldn’t the Daily Mail just LOVE IT is Meghan put out a statement/denial about this article? Of course they would! Another reason it was likely written). If people want to believe this fanfic is from Meghan that’s on them. H&M have already said repeatedly they are not engaging with a tabloid they are in the process of *suing.*

    No. Kate brought all this mess on herself (with likely help from her mom) with that whole Tatler article in the first place. (Because yes they knew about it and yes they thought it was going to be more embiggening – until it wasn’t). This mess is her’s and Carole’s (and William’s too I’m thinking) mess to clean up, not Meghan’s.

  24. line says:

    I don’t think it’s a friend of Meghan but they must have written the article on based on the manys reactions of the people who have always supported Meghan and point fingers the enormous difference in treatment that Meghan had undergo compared other members of the royal family including Kate and Andrew. And the only reason why this article on Meghan is fair, it is the caused of the international political situation. We are in a period in which the world has finally decide to opened its eyes to the institutional racists that exist in the United States but also in the nations of the world against black community. So ransacking a black woman for that a mediocre white woman have a good looks would have been bad for them. Consequently, all of the racist British press tries to make themselves forgotten and also the treatment of Meghan and Archie.

  25. AnnaKist says:

    Daily Fail has always been in the business of writing fiction, or copying and pasting other people’s work and claiming it as their own. They’ll do whatever it takes to get clicks or sell papers. (Do they still have papers?) They’re garbage and I don’t know why we still pay attention to them.

    And, *gah*, those bloody hats. 😣 I’d have legged it, too.

  26. Mary says:

    I can’t wait for KP’s response!!

  27. Aurora says:

    They hired a great scriptwriter for this fake monologue because the feelings seem totally plausible.

    I feel like every article being written now is a preemptive move against the upcoming Sussex biography.

    • L84Tea says:

      I feel the same. A lot of journalists and publications are suddenly shaking in their boots. This article is proof that something is up–why the sudden change in tone towards Meghan? Why are they suddenly taking up for her? They’re all petrified about what is going to be said in that book.

      • BayTampaBay says:

        I think the British Tabloid Royal Reporters have seen researched and sourced excerpts from both the Scobie book and the Lady Colin Campbell book are actively course correcting themselves with as much haste as the can muster.

    • Nyro says:

      They were shook about the book before. But now, in this climate with massive Black Lives Matter protests and many white people finally admitting that systemic racism is real and something needs to be done about it, the British media and the royals have already lost the fight. Because when that book drips, they were ready to gaslight, accuse Meghan of “playing the race card”, accuse Harry of “virtue signalling wokeness” and basically being a race traitor, etc. That is what they were going to do. And now, in this racial climate, all of that has been taken from them. The world will FIRMLY be in the side of Meghan and Harry. You will see big names from all corners making a point to say they stand with Meghan and shame on the British media and royal family. The ride has totally changed in just two weeks. The Finding Freedom biography was always going to be bad for the royal family and the media, but now? If what they all seem to think is in the book is actually in the book, oh, they’re going to see a very real and very vocal backlash from the public.

  28. Bettyrose says:

    Was the wedding debacle about tights or hemlines??? We need answers. Release BBC’s investigative journalists.

  29. Vera says:

    of course none of Meghan’s friends went to the daily hate, it is all just guesswork by them.
    But I do find it typical of that horrid paper that they are only throwing Catherine under the bus, not William. It’s always only the women’s fault in their eyes. No mention of Harry and William’s massive fallout.
    I wouldnt be surprised if it’s also a foundation of narrative for when William will divorce Catherine. There are now reasons seeded in these articles to be used later:
    – she doesnt want to or incapable of putting in the work of a future queen consort. A divorce would allow her to be a stay at home mum, so really ‘it’s for her own benefit’
    – she was/is mean to Meghan and the reason for Harry and Meghan leaving (nothing to do with William, honest)
    – she was never accepted into the aristo circles, social climber etc…

    TBH it was always a doomed marriage and it will fail.

    • MsIam says:

      I think they will divorce or at least separate sooner rather than later. There are a number of reasons: a. William is bored and has one foot out of the door already. b. Charles hates the Middletons and I think he feels they are behind the “let’s skip over Charles and make Will king” movement. I still feel he had a hand in the Tatler mess. Plus the author Pasternak has said she now feels that Charles and Camilla make a good match and belong together. c. The aristos are lined up firmly against Kate and her family. Looks like the writing is on the wall for Kate, it’s just a question of will she go quietly or not. The armies are lining up for battle.

    • Jaded says:

      I think it’s already failed and they’re just going through the motions. There’s this thing called “psychological projection” in which the ego defends itself against negative impulses or qualities by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. I think this is what the Cambridges have been doing all along with the Sussexes – projecting their own failures, insecurities, empty marriage, etc. onto Harry and Meghan. The Sussexes totally eclipsed them work-wise and have a deliriously happy marriage. This exposed the chinks in Kate and William’s carefully contrived armour – their laziness, racism, one-upmanship, petty jealousy, and their complicity with the BM/KP/ROTA in suggesting Harry was weak and struggling while Meghan was a controlling b*tch. Well they kinda shot themselves in both feet didn’t they and the tide of public opinion seems to be changed pretty dramatically.

      • morrigan01 says:

        IDK. I’m still of the belief that they won’t divorce. I DO think they already live separate lives, but I think William does see a benefit of still being married to Kate, even if it’s just in name only at this point.

        A lot of the things directed at Meghan and Harry have always been projection wrt Kate and William – individually and relationship wise, yes. I mean, the narrative about Meghan being the ultimate social climber, the idea that she would push for Archie to have a title, even the idea that she was ever jealous of Kate. That was just projection wrt thing about Kate herself regarding herself – the obsession with status and titles, jealousy competing with other women, particularly Meghan at the time.

        And we all know Will has been jealous of Harry for many things, dating back even to when they were kids.

    • notasugarhere says:

      The Tatler article also gives divorce fodder of ‘Carole took advantage of vulnerable young William, he was manipulated into marrying Kate’.

      I don’t think William would go scorched earth on the Middletons unless they gave him no other choice. If Kate went quietly, no problem. If the Middletons protested, he’d use any trick in the book to make the PR come out on his side.

      • Vera says:

        I think they want her to go quietly ‘for her own benefit ‘
        The spin will go that way:
        She is shy, too much pressure, William married young, etc

        They will buy her off with money and allowing her to keep the kids and lifestyle. Once William has the Dutchy money coming in, it will happen

    • Nyro says:

      This is interesting because there’s a story in the DM today about how massively successful Harry’s charities have been since marrying Meghan. Another mostly positive story and shows what an asset Meghan is as a wife. Very interesting.

  30. HK9 says:

    Megan can’t believe the palace response? HA! Neither can I. This is a hot mess of lies, fan-fiction and more lies.

  31. Love shayari says:

    Even I think the same. I dont believe. What else can we talk, we can just stay tuned for the next updates.

  32. S808 says:

    We all know Meghan’s friends aren’t talking to the DM, that goes without saying. This tonal shift is very interesting…..they’re slowly turning on Kate it seems and I’m surprised it’s happening so soon. I thought the gloves would come off once the Sussexes don’t come back after the 1-year review. Oh well, it’s W&K’s fault for not having the foresight to realize with H&M out of the way someone has to feed the beast. They haven’t even touched William, only Kate. I think she made a huge mistake being a bitch at the CW ceremony, we all knew she was a mean girl but she gave us definitive proof. And looks like that’s her new narrative.

  33. Lizzie says:

    I always thought that reports that Kate and Pippa are both competitive as code for both are b!!ches. Nothing has changed my mind so far.

  34. Cosmo says:

    Interesting. The fail must be feeling the heat for their racist behavior these days. We all know they didn’t get this from Meghans friends. It probably came from twitter comments calling them out. I can’t stand these hypocrites pretending to support people of color now when they bullied one for the last three years. Disgusting.

  35. Fumi says:

    I really wish the racists at the DM would pay the people from whom they stole all this fanfic. We know that they don’t talk to anyone that could be considered to be in H&M’s circle. They are really scared that they are getting called out for how racist they were to Meghan and Archie. A reckoning is coming.

  36. yinyang says:

    Hey Daily Heil Meghan did not say that, she is not a trouble maker, stop making up stories, stick to your white princess please! PS Kate waist there?!

    • ennie says:

      her waist is alright, she’s had 3 kids; but she goes a bit much into lean territory and I think it is on purpose.

  37. Beach Dreams says:

    This is like the same Fail fanfiction about Meghan supposedly complaining about the difference in treatment with Kate earlier this year, just rehashed and updated to specifically fit the Tatler situation. But I agree with a lot of other posters…the media seems like it’s in the midst of turning on Kate. I thought the Tatler was a one-time smackdown, but other outlets are using that story to throw their own shade at Kate. I’ve also noticed that the Fail is using rather unflattering photos of her when tweeting links to these stories…

  38. Vanessa says:

    My My My how the table have turns now after years of putting Meghan through some of the most disgusting hateful racist treatment The British tabloids are trying to walk back there’s Treatments. The British tabloids Refused for years to admit that their treatment of Meghan were Racist the royal reporters were so Adamant that their Reporting on Meghan was just criticism and she can’t handle the negative comments. How stupid does the Royals reporter and the British tabloids Think the public is everything they ever written about Meghan is online forever the headlines straight outta Compton the mixing of exotic blood in the royal family Archie getting called a Monkey . The British press helped whipped up the Most hateful disgusting racist campaign against Meghan they help spread conspiracy theorists about her they pay her father her half sister to go on tv shows to trash her daily for three years . Pier Morgan famous said on his talk show if Meghan doesn’t like the treatment she should go back to American Now all suddenly the same people who made this woman life a living nightmare for three years straight are trying to act like they care about Racism they have Realized they gotten to far . These white royal reporters don’t give a damn about Black lives matter or anything to do with Racism their trying to jump on the bandwagon and also trying to cover up the part in driving a away the only woman of color in the royal family they know they took it far . As for the daily mail trying to repair the damage by making up a decent story about Meghan nice try but it won’t erase the memories of what they put Meghan through. And Kate and her mother should have know better the palace only protects the heir to the throne the tabloids are going to have a new target is will be kate .

  39. Lala11_7 says:

    Meghan might not of said this…but it rings true

  40. L4frimaire says:

    This is such utter nonsense. The Sussexes will not engage, or ever engage, with this messy rag. They stated through legal channels that they don’t f*ck with the Daily Fail. The only “ friends” they’re quoting are comments from Twitter and sites like this. They just mine social media for quotes or see what M’s friends are liking on social media. Also, sick of the Cambridge’s using the Sussexes to prop themselves up, whether through tearing down Meghan or making Harry seem like a “ fragile” mess. Why they keep trying to drag the Sussexes into this little article they had nothing to do with? The Fail is so desperate for Sussex content and they can keep looking at that brick wall graffitied with Schillings.

  41. MA says:

    This is like when children play with dolls. They’re inventing dialogue and speaking to and and behalf of Meghan at the same time. It’s hilariously sad.

  42. yinyang says:

    Ha! The tatler and dailyfail are realizing what sells! What better than to have the perfect rich white princess born with a silver spoon take the fall. As much as I love Meghan (I would want her for my daughter, or sister, or mother, or best friend)– but nobody wants gossip about their mother, daughter, sister you love, everyone wants gossip about the girl who was born with everything but screws up so badly with her scheming ways, covers up her flashing past, calcutalted evertyhing to get the ring and stomped on everyone to get to where she is. Kate and her mother’s scheming ways is what sells– and the Tatler and Dailymail are finally realizing this haha. Funny how William said he sides with the media when Harry attacked them, he’s about to eat his words. Bad sells and Kate has plenty of it.

  43. ennie says:

    hahahaI really don’t think Meghan is mad about anything. As if. that was bout to happen, they (M and H) know treatment and reporting was being unfair.
    They might be smirking about it, tho, the press are cannibals.

  44. LRobb says:

    I am impatient with the world today. My response to this DM article. Stupid. That is all.

  45. A says:

    This is pretty good fanfic from the Fail, but it’s still fanfic. They pretty much just culled through all the social media/gossip website responses for this garbage and it shows. Nice try Fail.

  46. MaryContrary says:

    And now the Fail is running some ridiculous story calling out Meghan and Harry for NOT speaking out on the protests. It boggles the mind how they get blamed no matter what they do. If they had issued a statement (how, I don’t know, since they don’t currently have social media or a spokesperson) they would have gotten dragged for that as well.

    • yinyang says:

      Lol Meghan is biracial!!! And she delivered a message about it so they can’t even try that, Meghan has been an advocate for rasicm before and after joining the royal family, so the bristish media is looking even more rascist now than ever and they can’t even throw their go-to BIRACIAL scapegoat under the bus this time!! Sucks to be them. Im not British, but the whole world was watching when thousands protested before Boris Johnson yesterday condemning him for his late reaction of George Floyd. The British are looking very rascist in the eyes of the world, they’re catching up to Trump. Prince Charles didn’t even think it was worthy to address it on his zoom call pr stunt yesterday.

  47. Lizzie says:

    Meghan has never said anything about Kate. Look who Meghan rolls with, I’m sure she forgot Kate’s name by now.
    If true, this would be a Kate move, not Meghan.

    • Nyro says:

      It’s going to get harder and harder for them to push this idea that Meghan is jealous of and obsessed with bringing Kate down once Archewell launches. Yes, that was Meghan with Melinda Gates speaking at the graduation for Oprah’s South African boarding school. Oh, and yes that was Meghan interviewing Melinda Gates at a women’s small business forum in Botswana the week before that. But yes, it was Meghan who went behind the scenes to contact the editor of Country Life magazine to make sure he/she put an unflattering photo of Kate on the cover. SMH. Meghan already makes them look small. Once Archewell is in full swing and they see the circles H&M are running in, the rest of the royals and all their petty drama will look like useless ribbon cutting clowns.

  48. paddingtonjr says:

    Is this FFQC Karen so out of touch and thin-skinned? The world is in the middle of a pandemic and, just as states/countries are starting to re-open, people are rightfully angry and scared about how black people are being treated. And she’s still upset over a frothy gossip article? Great choice for consort Billy. I’ll admit, I’ve always thought of the BRF as a good source of distraction and mindless entertainment, that is, until the last few years. No one in the family seems concerned about Pedo Andy or how Meghan and Archie have been treated, yet the UK has come to a standstill when Katie Keen throws a temper-tantrum over a nothing article that could blown over in a few days.

    While I do like to think the DM has accurately summarized Meghan’s feelings, I doubt anyone connected to her (however tangently) shared her thoughts, hopes and dreams with the Daily Mail.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      She’s always been like that. Years ago an article mentioned that she used hair extensions – and KP promptly issued a denial, over hair extensions! Nobody cares if Kate uses extensions or not, the only one who cares is Kate because it is apparently very important to her that the public knows that her hair is all her own (whether that is really true or not). So, yes, she is thin-skinned and vain.

  49. Marivic says:

    @Amelie. Yes I’m with you that the soft treatment of Meghan nowadays in some British media is connected to the backlash of the ongoing protests in the U.S. Black Lives Matter. They probably didn’t realize the negative impact this racism will affect them if they don’t stop their unfounded and inflammatory rant against Meghan at this time when emotions and tensions are high and inflammable. Even William and Kate have shown support to the cause. As if this would erase the fact that they bullied Meghan and PHarry out of U.K.

  50. anon says:

    Warning: This post contains swear words, but today (of all days) is not the day.

    Maybe #BlackLivesMatter needs to be spray painted on Kensington Palace for these MoFos to get the message.

    Kathy and Bill got all Karened up and ran off the only interesting thing to happen to the BRF since – well, ever, honestly. In the middle of a global pandemic and worldwide protests over George Floyd, THESE TWO ARE STILL STARTING SHIT two years after the fact to score points in some kind of Hunger Games: The Royal Edition.

    So I’m sure Meghan prolly watched John Boyega’s London speech today and raised a toast and a middle finger to the fading empire in the east.

    Fuck the royal family and fuck Camp Cambridge.

  51. Emily says:

    The Daily Mail peddles hate. It’s not surprising that without Meghan to hate on they would direct it at Kate. Rarely William though, wonder if it’s because of his penis?

    The Keens seem so out to touch for making something out of the Tatler article. They’ve given it more mileage and publicity then it would have otherwise.

    • ArtHistorian says:

      William is the heir and the media rarely goes after the blood royals. They only did in the 1990s because Diana opened the door herself and because the public loved her much more than all the other royals.