Megan Fox rocks a high-fashion look for Toronto premiere

Jennifers Body Premiere - 2009 Toronto International Film Festival

Megan Fox was the red carpet star of the Toronto Film Festival premiere of her film Jennifer’s Body. She showed up in a very interesting black Valentino cocktail dress and Christian Louboutin ankle-strap peep-toe heels. When I first saw these pictures, I thought “Oh, God. What is she wearing now?” But as I’m studying the details of the dress and how it fits her, I kind of think the dress rocks. I like the swirling-fabric effect on the skirt, and it works on Megan because she’s so thin, and she has such nice, slender legs. On a woman with larger hips or less-than-perfect legs, this dress would be horrible and bulky. But Megan pulls it off well, and this is the most “high fashion” I’ve ever seen her look.

Of course, Megan’s mouth is open in half of the red carpet pictures. She’s a total mouth-breather, but whatever. According to sources, Megan worked the carpet like she was hardcore, “playing up for the cameras and adopting a number of playful – but sexy – poses.” At the press conference before the premiere, Megan told journalists, “There’s a girl-on-girl kiss. This movie is so sexy. You better put on your sexy shoes for this one.” Oh, you sell it, honey. Because that’s all the fan boys want. They want to see Megan in a state of undress, kissing a girl. Nevermind that Jennifer’s Body is about “a cheerleader who ends up being possessed by a demon intent on seducing and killing all the boys in her high school.” Megan kisses a girl, so it’s sexy!

The “girl” she kisses is Amanda Seyfried, who also walked the red carpet last night. At first glance, I thought her sleeveless grey dress was completely see-through, but I can see that the dress is lined with flesh-colored fabric. It’s a strange effect, but it didn’t help Amanda get in many of these pictures, which is too bad. I’d never noticed what a nice, curvy figure Amanda has, and she really is a pretty little thing. Too bad the cameras were only on Megan.

In one last note – at the press conference, Jennifer’s Body director Karyn Kusama took a page out of Megan Fox’s Transformers-disrespect, and told reporters, “It was hard to know what her range was after Transformers, and I don’t think she would disagree with that…But it was really a pleasure to… see that she really had the goods.” The goods = boobs and an open mouth.

Jennifers Body Premiere 2009 Toronto Film Festival

Jennifers Body Premiere - 2009 Toronto International Film Festival

Jennifers Body Premiere - 2009 Toronto International Film Festival

Jennifers Body Premiere - 2009 Toronto International Film Festival

Jennifers Body Premiere - 2009 Toronto International Film Festival

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

35 Responses to “Megan Fox rocks a high-fashion look for Toronto premiere”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Firestarter says:

    That dress is kind of fug on the bottom and I think that she kind of cheapens it. It certainly does not look like a Valentino, more like a Filene’s basement, that is how much she cheapens it. She even ruins Louboutain’s!

    Amamnda looks like a cute, fresh, young actress, not some cheap street walker like Fox.

  2. londoner says:

    Nothing ruins a fabulous dress like a trashy tattoo.

  3. Heavenbound says:

    Even though this chick has severe diarrhea of the mouth, she is very pretty.. Yes plastic surgery and all.. Her surgeon is good.

  4. omondieu says:

    I’m so torn with Jennifer’s Body. It’s probably great, being Diablo Cody…but it stars Megan Fox…

    Also, I can’t believe I’m seeing a photo of Megan with her mouth CLOSED (as it should be). If her tongue’s not hanging out like a basset hound’s (my apologies to basset hounds everywhere), it’s in this weird half-smile-half-snarl (see fourth picture).

  5. The Nightmare says:

    Does her neck looks like it belongs on a 40 year old? Are we sure she’s as young as she says she is?

  6. GatsbyGal says:

    Trashy tattoo, trashy girl…

    It’s like wrapping a piece of crap in silk. No matter how expensive or pretty that silk was on its own, it’s ruined now.

  7. heeeey says:

    isn’t that the boy who never got the chance to give her a rose in the 2nd pic?
    and I do see her holding a red rose in the last pic.
    it certainly was nice of her/ her manager to get the boy to meet her

  8. Praise St. Angie! says:

    I think the shoes would have looked better without the ankle straps, like the ones her co-star is wearing. Either that or wear the ankle-strap shoes with a longer dress.

    and yes, londoner, I TOTALLY agree.

    that arm tattoo cheapens the whole look.

  9. QB says:

    heeeey , no thats not him , the rose boy was whiter and shorter.

  10. Eileen Yover says:

    Ok I hate to say this-but I think she is absolutely gorgeous. Too bad she’s a freak and has diarrhea of the mouth.
    Tattoos don’t bother me-I have three…not a fan of that one, but I don’t think much of anything can ruin her look. Even those crappy shoes and legging she wore the other day-still pretty to me!
    And I love Amanda’s dress-she looks gorgeous too!

  11. Mairead says:

    I think it’s quite the fabulous dress, and she looks very well and much less plasticky than usual. And a closed mouth is a nice change.

    Of course, the fact that I mistook her for Katy Perry might have helped me like the look more… 😉 Amanda’s dress photographs appallingly though.

    The film will be interesting to see. So far I’ve only seen Fox in one thing and she was atrocious, but here’s hoping there’s a modicum of talent to back up the nonsensical ramblings.

  12. Film2TV says:

    heeeey: No that’s her costar Johnny Simmons who plays Chip, Needys boyfriend.

  13. viper says:

    Nothing, no matter what brand she wears or who hand sitched it to together using the finest of the finest silks in all the planet, could make this girl look classy. She is a cheap knock off, a bootleg beauty, a lousy actress and the air in her head is wasted. If there is a God I pray that this cheap tattooed fugly fake girl disappears.

  14. yadira says:

    Such a tiny waist! She is very beautiful but needs to learn to keep her mouth shut more often then spill a bunch of crap out of it

  15. the original kate says:

    nope, still trashy.

  16. Saila says:

    …This is not high fashion. I was expecting to see something awesome when I clicked on the story link. It’s just an irregular-looking dress. There is nothing high-fashion about what she is wearing. Or anything she usually wears, for that matter…

  17. ok says:

    She looks pretty here, but I’m not sure she’s that talented. We’ll see how jennifer’s body does.

  18. Ana says:

    I would never be able to wear anything high fashion, eve if I could afford it. It wouldn’t look right on me.
    Cate Blanchett was made for high fashion.
    The dress was alright. kind of looks like a funky prom dress. She does look pretty. Her lips are getting bigger.

  19. waldemar says:

    The dress and her hairstyle makes her look like Kate Perry.

    and that tattoo is vile, never noticed it before. Is it new?

    edit- damn, Mairead beat me to it

  20. Oh well says:

    I was at midnight madness to see Jennifer’s Body last night. The dress is much prettier in person and Megan is GORGEOUS!!! Though she is shorter than I expected, like 5’3″ or 5’4″ at the most. Even with the heels she was still tiny.

  21. Bobby the K says:


    i always thought tattoos stopped being edgy sometime in the 80’s. when non-threatening people started getting them.

    there are some that look good, but most are an average example of a stale fad.

    i guess the one on her arm is of a certain quality. but it’s in a goofy place.

  22. sweet says:

    i found this interview where she talks about the kiss in a totally different way. it’s easy to take a quote out of context.

  23. nnn says:

    She is absolutely beautiful but somehow gives some tranny vibes with the overall shape of her face, especially in pictures 1.

  24. Mairead says:

    @ waldemar – thank goodness it’s not just me that thinks it 🙂

  25. len_mo says:

    im waiting for her to say she looks up to dita vonteese when it comes to fashion.

  26. Thais says:

    she looks great…. i am glad she is not rail thin!

  27. Hieronymus Grex says:

    Dita Von Teese does it better.

  28. lennie says:

    No matter how hard she tries, she always looks cheap. Only her could cheappen those louboutins and that dress.

  29. danielle says:

    I think Megan is a very pretty girl, too bad about that tatoo tho – I’m not a fan of tattoos in general, but that was is very hideous.

  30. Bleh says:

    When she outed the director and that horrifying car washing stunt, that was awesome. The problem is she doesn’t walk the walk. All she does are exploitation roles despite her claims at being independent minded and progressive. And her endless emulation of Angelina Jolie’s tiresome schpiel is hardly progressive or daring. She’s not sexy just laboring to create a persona of sexy which is always embarrassing.

  31. Cheyenne says:

    Megan Fox’s crew members on “Transformers” just slammed the hell out of her. Read and cringe. It ain’t pretty.

  32. Andrea says:

    both dresses are great, megan looks cheap (i dont think its possible to not look cheap with that tattoo on her arm) and overdone – kind of a prom effect overall – not amanda’s best look (i like the dress, but not great on her, washes her out, would be better on a darker skinned woman), but she’s going for a different rep than megan. also, its really time for the louboutins to go away, or at least not have the red bottom anymore. it distracts from outfits and has just become so commonplace.

  33. Michelle says:

    Amanda Seyfried is infinitely hotter and more talented than the overrated, soon-to-be-a-hasbeen Megan Fox.

  34. orion70 says:

    I dislike both dresses. Also, Amanda looks like she’s falling out of her shoes on bottom pic.

  35. mojoman says:

    After watching her in transformers 2, I feel so humiliated, this chick really insults my intelligence..