Diablo Cody: ‘I would trade my Oscar for a billion-dollar movie right now’

Ten years ago, Diablo Cody was attached to the first big attempt to turn Barbie into a movie. Diablo, who won an Oscar for her Juno screenplay, was tasked with making a feminist Barbie movie with Amy Schumer as the lead, and something happens where Barbie is kicked out of BarbieWorld. The project died, partly because of Diablo (she couldn’t figure out how to write it) and partly because of Amy (she sucks). Time passed and Margot Robbie went to Mattel and asked if she could try to put something together. She pitched her production company to produce, and she hired Greta Gerwig to write the screenplay (Greta would rope in her partner Noah Baumbach as co-writer). The rest is history – they made a wonderfully appealing movie, Barbie has made over $1.4 billion and Gerwig and Robbie were just snubbed for acting and directing Oscar nominations. People Mag recently chatted with Diablo about her thoughts on Barbie and the Oscar snubs.

Diablo Cody is sharing her point of view on those Barbie Oscar nominations. The writer, who won the Best Original Screenplay Academy Award back in 2008 for Juno, previously took a stab at writing a Barbie film that never came to fruition. The version that did make a splash in theaters last year, directed and co-written by Greta Gerwig, this week earned eight Oscar nominations, including for Best Picture. Still, Gerwig being left out of the Best Director category and Margot Robbie’s absence in the Best Actress race were considered snubs by fans.

“Here’s what I’m going to say. Obviously, of course I think Greta deserved a nomination and so did Margot,” Cody, 45, tells PEOPLE. “But they made a billion dollars on that movie, okay? I would trade my Oscar for a billion-dollar movie right now, if I could flip a switch! Sorry if that’s disrespectful to the Academy.”

“They made a billion dollars and they got eight nominations across the board,” Cody says. “Margot got nominated as a producer, which I think, knowing what she has been trying to do in her career, I feel like that must’ve been incredibly satisfying for her. And Greta created a phenomenon.”

“I’m telling you, that was a tough project,” says Cody, whose next film is the teen horror-romance Lisa Frankenstein. “Having worked on [a Barbie project] made me respect it all the more, because that is a very challenging property to take and turn into something real. And they did it.”

“So you could call it a snub, but I think that what they achieved is probably bigger than those individual nominations,” she adds.

[From People]

I think all of this is true and Diablo is in a unique position to speak about how difficult it really was to turn “a doll” into a billion-dollar movie. Diablo tried and she couldn’t work it out, and she’s pointing out how f–king difficult it was for Gerwig and Robbie to do what they did. That’s what bugs me the most about the Oscar snubs – the Oscar voters failed to recognize the difficulty and the huge swing Robbie and Gerwig took here. They didn’t value the creativity, they didn’t value how hard it was to thread that needle and they certainly didn’t value a pop culture phenomenon which appealed to girls and women. As for Diablo saying she’d rather have a billion-dollar movie than an Oscar… maybe that’s true too. But why not both? Why does it have to be either/or?

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “Diablo Cody: ‘I would trade my Oscar for a billion-dollar movie right now’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. JaneS says:

    Agree. Financial security would be great.

    • Nubia says:

      I read somewhere that as a producer Margot profited something like 60M ,this seems small compared to how much it made. Can someone enlighten me on how much production companies make after the fact?

      • lanne says:

        Good for her! It’s a helluva a lot more than she would have made just as an actress. It very likely could be more at the end, with back-end deals and such. She can spend the rest of her career doing what she wants on her own terms. Good for her! She can tell the skeevy Harvey Weinsteins of the world (and you know he wasn’t the only one–only the most egregious) to spontaneously combust.

      • Ameerah M says:

        That would be pretty hard to estimate without knowing the details of their actual contract. Percentages are negotiated and aren’t generally public info. If her Production company had a 50% stake (highly unlikely) then they made way more than 60mil. More than likely Margot herself didnt take an actor’s fee (or took a reduced actor’s fee) but opted to take a producer’s fee, plus a percentage of the profits . Which could certainly be around that amount.

      • KASalvy says:

        To break it down (saying the movie made 1B and supposedly cost about $150M to make)

        40-60% goes to theaters and their operating costs = down to 500M
        $150M to make the movie = $350M
        Distribution/Marketing Fee (varies from 15-35%, settling on 25%, taken from the 500M, not the $350, and is constant, not a flat fee) = $225M
        Residuals/Union Fees – to be paid out before producers, can be $$$

        Let’s say lightly that we’re down to 200M. Investors get 50%, down to $100M

        Now you add producer/director/writer/actor backend points and you can easily see how she’s down to $60M.

  2. tealily says:

    I get it. But a huge financial success isn’t the same thing as peer recognition. I know a lot of people are having a lot of big feelings about these women not being nominated, and yes they will be fine, but on no planet is this not a snub from a bunch of old men trying to knock them down a peg.

    • Rnot says:

      Kinda like the difference between the popular vote and the electoral college. It’s market recognition. That’s not the same thing, but so many people voted for Barbie with their wallets for it to earn a billion dollars. In most ways that’s a much more authentic award than winning the approval of the pale, stale, and male. The snub doesn’t make their achievement less but it makes the Academy look ridiculous.

  3. KASalvy says:

    Unfortunately this happens a lot to Oscar winners. They get one “hit” and then the pressure to deliver the same or better caliber for every project after fails. Diablo’s most recognized success has been Juno (even with Jennifer’s Body, etc) but she’s had a string of failed pilots and features that have never seen the light of day, been canceled, panned, etc.

    I saw Lisa Frankenstein at a screening the other day and the best thing I can say about it is that thank goodness I never have to hear Cole Sprouse speak. Otherwise, it’s a copy of a whole bunch of other 80s/90s movies that we’ve already seen.

    Well, some of us depending how old you are.

    • Hannah says:

      Not to knock Greta, both women I think are talented, but the one thing that Greta has is Noah, and that couple with her raw talent is what sets Greta apart from equally talented people like Diablo.

  4. bisynaptic says:

    I ❤️ her dissing the Academy.