King Charles’s foundation was ‘allocated £6 million of taxpayers’ money’

King Charles, who is being treated for cancer, has had more on his schedule this week than his heir. Bloop! On Wednesday, Charles did a Zoom with Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and Charles also did some in-person diplomatic stuff. He formally accepted the credentials of two new ambassadors (from Mauritania and Algeria) and the king allowed a photographer to capture photos. Which is why we have so many photos of Charles’s hands looking discolored and swollen. Earlier in the week, Charles did an in-person audience with Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt, because the Sunak government has released their budget this week. Speaking of, there was a little something extra for Charles in the budget:

The chancellor has used his spring budget to allocate £6 million of taxpayers’ money to the King’s charity. Jeremy Hunt has given the award to the King’s Foundation to trial “regeneration projects anchored around heritage assets and sustainability considerations”.

The chancellor met the King in the private audience room at Buckingham Palace on Tuesday, as is customary before a budget. He went on to include the details of a multimillion-pound project for the King’s Foundation, formerly the Prince’s Foundation. Under the heading “Community regeneration projects”, the budget states: “The government is providing £6 million of funding for work with the King’s Foundation to pilot how community-led regeneration projects anchored around heritage assets and sustainability considerations can complement government’s wider place-based initiatives for levelling up, subject to business case approval”.

A source said: “It’s pretty incredible that public money has been allocated to the King’s charity given everything that has gone on there.”

In September 2021, a letter was published in which Michael Fawcett, a close aide of the king, said that he was “willing and happy” to support a wealthy foreign donor in his application for British citizenship and to “increase his Excellency’s honour from Honorary CBE to that of KBE in accordance with Her Majesty’s Honours committee”. Fawcett subsequently stepped down from his role as the charity’s chief executive.

The Metropolitan Police dropped its “cash for honours” investigation after arresting two employees but concluding that the individuals should face no further action. However, the King’s Foundation, which is based in Dumfries House in Ayrshire, remains under active investigation by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator over a historical donation from a foreign donor, some of which appeared to be misappropriated after being passed to middle men acting for the charity.

[From The Times]

I know it’s difficult to keep up with all of Charles’s financial shenanigans, but this is bad – this money is going to the King’s Foundation (formerly the Prince’s Foundation), which controls Dumfries House and some of Charles’s sketchier schemes. Under the guise of “fundraising” for his foundation, Charles passed out knighthoods to all manner of oligarchs and despots, all for seven-figure donations. I’m still halfway convinced that Charles and Michael Fawcett used the foundation as a slush fund to cover up some of their failed schemes elsewhere. And now the foundation is getting taxpayer money for some projects, likely in or around Dumfries House? Hm.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

22 Responses to “King Charles’s foundation was ‘allocated £6 million of taxpayers’ money’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. WiththeAmerican says:

    UK taxes are headset to their highest since 1948. The taxpayers keep getting drained for this lot.

    • Pinkosaurus says:

      Isn’t the Crown Grant supposed to increase by a huge amount in the near future? I’ve been wondering if the papers will say anything about it given William’s refusal to work.

  2. B says:

    Much like Kate’s privacy being respected by the media highlighted the difference in treatment for Harry and Meghan so does this. When it was announced Meghan was a Angel investor in Clever Blends the UK press went so far as to investigate the fields the beans were being grown in so they could find a hint of impropriety but THIS public in your face money laundering is met with radio silence.

    • ML says:

      I do not understand this either, B. At all. Sometimes someone says something about injunctions and such, but that surely cannot cover sketchy behavior? I also do not understand how it’s absolutely fine that a bunch of newspapers that mainly shape British public opinion are able to show such incredibly favoritism in how they do it and bend the truth.

  3. Wow taxpayers money for his foundation. The taxpayers need that money more than his foundation. My god the taxpayers should be outraged. When he got it did it come in a nice bag filled with cash or no it just got put into the “foundations” account.

  4. Brassy Rebel says:

    I hope the British taxpayers are starting to question this stuff. They’ve put up with far too much for far too long.

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      Seems like the british people are not fighting to find out. How many times do they have to point out the king’s money grab for people to push back and demand asnwers?

  5. Harla A Brazen Hussy says:

    I read the budget statement 3xs and can’t make sense of what this is going to do or accomplish. It really is the definition of “word salad”. If I were a British citizen I would be furious at the waste of my tax money.

  6. Bee says:

    His hands have become tampons, disgusting.

  7. equality says:

    Wonder how many times taxpayer money has gone to all their charities and just not been reported. Bet it’s not the first time. They all want to dig into H&M’s finances and totally ignore requiring transparency in finances from the RF. The money from their duchys and holdings should be more than enough to finance their families and their charities. I guess, those willing to pay for honors have dried out?

  8. Jais says:

    And they call Meghan and Harry grifters?

  9. Harla A Brazen Hussy says:

    I just saw on Twitter that London’s Air Ambulance isn’t getting any government funding this year but Chuck is??? What the actual F???

    • ML says:

      Save old buildings, not lives! It’s more sustainable! Great way to advertise for KC and company.s/

      Chuck’s hands: in my experience, circulation (high BP), heart disease or kidney disease could cause this.

  10. Jaded says:

    The NHS is underfunded.
    Nine out of ten schools in England are running out of money.
    Energy costs are skyrocketing.
    Jobs are disappearing.
    Rents are rising.
    Gas prices are rising.
    The Tories cut £250m from social care workforce funding.

    And Chuck gets £6 million to pretty up heritage homes (aka Dumphries) which, as Great Steward, is run by Chuck. #abolishthemonarchy.

    • Belinda says:

      Exactly. A heartbreaking article 8n The Guardian recently highlighted how some children were eating sand out of the Sandbox play area when they arrived at school in the morning because they were so hungry. So so sad. And now this £6 million for restoring old buildings through Chucks charity. I’m beyond despair now.

  11. swaz says:

    THIS IS SO SHAMEFUL 🙄🙄🙄 BUT THEN AGAIN THE MONARCHY’S BUSINESS MODEL IS TO TAKE, TAKE, TAKE FROM THE TAXPAYERS 🙄🙄🙄

  12. Rnot says:

    My God. He looks so much like Philip in that shot with Trudeau. I don’t think he’s long for this world.

  13. Tennyson says:

    Can a medical professional tell us about the hands?

    • SisterMadly says:

      The look of his hands (which I recall noticing back at the coronation) remind me most of people who are in heart failure. It’s pretty common in elderly people, although swollen hands are a less common symptom than swollen feet/legs. You also see that sort of symptom in kidney disease. There’s no reason KC couldn’t have multiple medical issues, it’s pretty common in elderly people.

  14. Gabby says:

    The money is going in the wrong direction. It should be coming out of the RF coffers to the UK treasury (or whatever you call it there).

    Jaded, a few posts above, has listed better priorities for taxpayer money. I would also add medical personnel to that. Haven’t doctors and nurses, and others been going on strike there on a regular basis?

  15. fabulous says:

    All the talk of H&M and W&K is just noise to cover all this up. Charles is dodgy AF. Why doesn’t the media say anything? Because in Britain the establishment is everything. Power, cache, prestige.