Scarlett Johansson refuses to get on Instagram: ‘It goes against my core values’

Scarlett Johansson covers the latest issue of InStyle, mostly to promote Jurassic World Rebirth, I guess, even though it comes out this summer. I think she agreed to this interview to talk about her entrance into the beauty world, her clean-beauty company The Outset. The celebrity-beauty company industry is so oversaturated, but the girls keep starting these companies and many of them are wildly successful. Scarlett’s got a different business model though – while The Outset is on social media, Scarlett is not. Scarlett refuses. Scarlett will not promote her films, TV appearances or her beauty business on social media. Studio publicists and her own company’s co-founder have begged her for years, but Scarlett just shrugs off their pleas. She talks about that extensively in InStyle. Some highlights:

On Colin Jost’s SNL joke “I’ve been eating roast beef every night since my wife had the kid.” “It was so vulgar. I just can’t believe that they went there. I was like—it was so gross. It was really gross.” She starts laughing. “And, like, old-school gross. My experience of it was so funny.”

How close she’s gotten to getting on Instagram: “I got close enough to talk to my therapist about it. I was like, I guess this is something I need to do. But it goes against my core values. I think it was more about: How do I express that, too? Because there’s so much expectation from…” She trails off.

Universal wanted her to get an IG too: “I mean, even today, I got an email from Universal [Pictures], and they’re like, ‘Hey, would you consider joining Instagram in tandem with the release of Jurassic World: Rebirth?’ [I] get a lot of pressure to join social media.” It does make her think. “Is there a way I could do this and stay true to who I am? It didn’t feel like I could. The work that I put out there is all based in truth. That’s the key ingredient. So if I was a person who really enjoyed social media, then I could totally get on the bandwagon. But I’m not. And I think the film will do fine.”

What she learned from suing Disney (she settled with them in 2021): “I don’t need to be beating the drum the whole time. That’s not my place. But, also, I’m not afraid of being invalidated. For certain things, particularly with the streamer residual piece, when the industry is in the process of this huge shift, that bubble eventually had to burst. I guess the bubble popped with me in a way. I’m fortunate enough to have been working for such a long time, and not that long ago felt settled with where I am in my career.” She says she, not so long ago, lived feast or famine. “Like every single actor working, I had this constant fear that everything would go away. Or that every movie would be my last. I am still the 8-year-old kid just waiting to get another part. But now I see that actually I built something that… that I have a place here. And because of that, I’ve been able to stand up for myself and not feel like I would disappear. I can shoulder it.”

She’s open in her real life, but not online: “But if anyone knows me, I definitely over-share. I’m not a closed book, you know? I’m politically active and vocal about it. But I am a private person in the sense that I value my close friendships. My family is very precious to me, as is their privacy. The anonymity of my children is very precious to me. I was talking to my daughter the other day, because she said, ‘Oh, I would love to make videos for The Outset.’ She was like, ‘Why can’t I?’ And I said, ‘Well, other than the fact that you’re 10…’”

You can never put the fame genie back in the bottle: “The thing about being a public figure is that the idea of being recognizable and celebrated feels fun, but then you can never stuff it back in the bottle. The reality of it is, there’s a massive loss to that, you know? So I think preserving that for as long as possible until it’s someone’s choice, that’s the choice I make as far as my kids go. I want to go and buy my own shit at Duane Reade.”

She’s wanted to join the Jurassic universe for a long time: “I saw the first one when I was, like, 11. And it looked like nothing we’d ever seen before. I remember it so clearly. The music, the Brontosaurus, the whole thing. The first time that T-Rex screamed, oh my God, it was transcendent.”

[From InStyle]

While I’m no ScarJo fan or apologist, I was on her side in her Disney lawsuit and I was appalled on her behalf for the way she was treated. I enjoy her perspective on that, four years later – that she didn’t have to become the face of “celebrities standing up to studios,” but she’s fine with shouldering some of the responsibility to get things moving. That lawsuit was the precursor to the SAG strike which was mostly about the same thing: how actors get paid in the age of streaming. As for getting on Instagram… like, even Angelina Jolie is on Instagram now, even if she never promotes her films – Jolie is highlighting her humanitarian and charitable interests, plus some Atelier Jolie stuff (which is adjacent to her humanitarian work). I guess my point is, social media is what you make it. It would be easy enough for Scarlett to get an IG and just post work stuff (film promo and beauty promo). But if she doesn’t want to, so be it. It’s funny that even the studios are trying to get her on IG though.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, cover courtesy of InStyle.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

24 Responses to “Scarlett Johansson refuses to get on Instagram: ‘It goes against my core values’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Friendly Crow says:

    So using social media to as part of a PR push is against her core values. She could literally hire someone to run the account and use it for promotion and behind scenes at events. But no. Core values.

    But no ethical considerations or core values against white washing characters, storylines and cultures.

    she consistently and unapologetically white washed characters thereby erasing the chance for much needed cultural and social representation from minority actors. She also appropriates storylines that are created by and for different under represented groups and changes the whole nuance that a person of a different race snd part of the culture represented would be able to so positively project.

    If she “believed in the film” she could sign on as a producer or for a smaller role instead of consistently centering her whiteness in stories not meant to be told by her.

    • Truthiness says:

      Nobody should be forced to use any of Zuckerberg’s platforms, just like nobody should be forced onto Elon’s twitter. I won’t forgive or forget any of the misinformation spread on them, it affects our lives and elections. Zuckerberg refused any misinformation accountability even in front of Congress.

      Boycotting the oligarchies should be the norm as much as possible, I’d rather light my hair on fire than start an account on a Meta platform or get on a Blue Origin flight.

      • alteya says:

        ^This. Zuck is just another MAGAT sellout. One who sells all your private data to Russia and China.

    • Thinking says:

      To be honest, I think using social media is against our values. But we participate just to fit in.

      I believe her when she says she doesn’t enjoy social media. I think a lot of people don’t find enjoyment but use it anyway because of fear of losing friends and connections.

      If most of us could get away without using social media, I think we would.

      I think it’s possible she fears the addiction that comes with having an account. I’m not addicted to posting, but I am addicted to doom-scrolling when I have my phone in my hand. It becomes kind of mindless browsing. She probably doesn’t want to pick up that habit either.

      I do agree with people who say some of these platforms are contingent on how we use them, but when a phone is in my hand the mindlessness takes over and I’ve wasted most of my life. It’s not a good feeling.

      • Boilhot says:

        Network effect. Everyone on it so you do miss out on updates if you’re not on it.

        “Nobody should be forced to use any of Zuckerberg’s platforms, just like nobody should be forced onto Elon’s twitter.” Exactly. I don’t have any social media and I feel far more productive as a person. I love texting and email.

    • Megan says:

      Little Miss Soda Stream needs to STFU about her core values.

    • sevenblue says:

      “So if I was a person who really enjoyed social media, then I could totally get on the bandwagon. But I’m not.”

      She is saying that she doesn’t want to have a social media presence and doesn’t wanna pretend to like it. There is nothing offensive here. Some people enjoy social media, interacting with other people, sharing things. If you don’t, why should you? She has enough fame and money not to do it for financial reasons. The new artists will unfortunately never have the luxury to say no to this request especially at the start of their careers.

    • Tre says:

      Friendly crow. I agree. I was a huge fan of hers and lost interest right before her first marvel movie. I think a lot of her old fans felt the same. Her acting just went down.
      The studios and her friends shoehorn her into movies. Instagram won’t help her.

      It’s misleading for her to frame social media this way. She uses the entertainment press as social media. She always has. Her managers and pr are great.

      Social media would just expose her for not being that popular. Just like the “Black Widow” movie exposed her. Marvel/disney didn’t think she could open a movie. No one talks about Black Widow movie.

      • Friendly Crow says:

        I absolutely agree with her decision not to be on social media. At this point it does seem like “part of the job” but she does so many interviews etc that I think it’s absolutely fine.

        What I take umbrage with is her causing wide spread harm with her whitewashing characters and storylines because she feels like it. It’s reprehensible. So to have such a firm stance on social media but not on literally stealing cultural representation from different groups seems like a very self serving kind of ethical framework.

  2. pyritedigger says:

    Social media is the incubator of so much harm on individual and social levels. The misinformation, the brainwashing, the stealing hours and days and years of our lives mindlessly scrolling.

    Why do you think her daughter — at age 10 — wants to be the face of a beauty brand aimed at adult woman? Because social media is saturated with content about the beauty industry for teens and pre-teens and even younger. It’s been shown to harm the mental health of everyone, but especially teen girls.

    Social media is possibly the biggest technological mistake aside from the atomic bomb or at least one of them.

    • CheekImplant says:

      I agree with all of your well stated points.

    • Mightymolly says:

      ITA but having a temporary IG site just for marketing a film is not really different than other promotional activities. If one could view it without creating an account.

    • sevenblue says:

      Before that, we had magazines, tabloids, tv shows where the actresses had to lose tons of weight to get on. The worst time I remember was the beginning of 2000s, with all the body shaming articles about women. The times before social media weren’t that different.

      • mightymolly says:

        I was there for all of that, and I have been hooked on Facebook since about 2010, but I left social media in January for one main reason: the proliferation of misinformation that’s made worse by bots that like, comment on, and validate false information. We didn’t have that technology in the 90s and even cable news was far less insane.

        But yeah misogyny is hardly new to the social media era.

      • pyritedigger says:

        It’s not that before social media there weren’t terrible things or that misinformation and other harms didn’t exist. Do you not recall the Facebook whistleblower?

        https://www.theverge.com/2021/10/6/22712927/facebook-instagram-teen-mental-health-research

    • Grace says:

      100% agree, and I am on all the sites. There is some fun and good on it, but overall, life is better without it, IMO. Such a HUGE time suck, misinformation, DISinformation, bullying of kids, peer pressure on kids and young adults, and random BS. I am working on getting completely away from it….And good for ScarJo, no matter what you think of her, not caving in to that pressure.

  3. michael says:

    For the record, she is on instagram, and it’s not really a secret. Romanoffthereal

  4. Truthiness says:

    I don’t have an instagram or FB because it’s Zuckerberg. I’ll hold a grudge forever because of the misinformation spread on his platforms, starting before 2016 and continuing to this day.

    Nobody should be asking Scarlett to promote anything on an oligarch’s platform, Zuckerberg has ALWAYS been part of the problem.

    • PixieButt says:

      Exactly, those are my reasons, too.
      I feel bad for younger people who never knew life before social media.
      Many, many people have lived happy and fulfilling lives without it.

    • Mightymolly says:

      I was never on IG but FB was my life for like 15 years. And I shut it down in January. I can’t believe how much I’m loving being of the socials. I’m on. Blue Sky but don’t post and barely check it. I still document all my activities because I can’t give that up but it’s like keeping a digital diary more than anything.

  5. Thinking says:

    She probably wants to avoid making a mistake on social media, which sounds wise to me.

    A lot of celebrities have good curated accounts where they appear normal because someone else is running them, but that’s what makes them kind of boring haha.

    Maybe she knows avoiding social media is the key to having mystique as a movie star, but is smart enough not to give away her secret.

    Social media is great entertainment coming from regular people, because they don’t know their limits and wind up embarrassing themselves and you can point and go tee-hee, but it is boring to see the really big celebrities share their lives on it. I think it’s easier for a lesser known actress to appear interesting on it because that’s the only way you can find out information about a new up and comer. But Jennifer Garner is not adding anything new to the mix.

    To be fair, who actually likes Instagram? It’s the most addictive of all the platforms. Facebook is too ugly at this point to keep up the addiction.

  6. Normades says:

    Good for her. She is A list that doesn’t need to do it.

  7. imara219 says:

    I completely get it. I’m not really into Insta personally. I can take it or leave it. I have been enjoying Threads but I refuse to be on TikTok. It’s a stance I care about and I don’t care how popular it is or how many clips people close to me share.

  8. Jessi says:

    I’m actually surprised it’s not a contractual obligation for celebrities to engage with social media when it comes to promoting projects – maybe you have to be a star of Scarlett’s wattage to opt out?