Queen Camilla wept at a mention of King Charles’s cancer on VJ Day

King Charles and Queen Camilla marked the 80th anniversary of VJ Day on Friday, August 15th. They attended a ceremony at the National Memorial Arboretum alongside Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his wife Victoria. Obviously, the Prince and Princess of Wales didn’t bother to show up and show any kind of in-person respect for the British and Allied veterans who fought in the Pacific. Incidentally, both Lord Mountbatten and Prince Philip were in the Pacific theater – that’s why Charles cares so much, because of his father and his godfather/mentor. It’s also worth noting that Charles, a 76-year-old man with cancer, has been busy all summer, while his work-shy heir only bothered to send a tweet on this major anniversary.

At the ceremony, several of the WWII veterans made speeches and gave readings. A 105-year-old veteran, Captain Yavar Abbas, went off-script before his reading, saying: “Before I read the excerpt, I make due apologies for briefly going off the script to salute my brave King, who is here with his beloved Queen in spite of the fact that he’s under treatment for cancer.” Abbas said that he had a cancer diagnosis too and he has been “rid of it for 25 years and counting.” In that moment, Camilla became visibly emotional, her eyes welling up with tears. She looked over to Charles, who seemed quite emotional too.

As Tom Sykes pointed out in his Substack, the British media is still operating under Buckingham Palace’s code of omerta regarding Charles’s cancer. His cancer is referenced less often than the Princess of Wales’s cancer, and Kate said herself that she’s been “cancer free” since last September. If the British media mentions Charles’s cancer at all, it’s a fleeting, optimistic reference to how he’s doing fine. This is what BP demands, and they regularly browbeat the royal rota and threaten to cut off access if any of them breaks ranks and actually raises real questions about the king’s health. From Sykes’ latest Substack piece:

In the old days, Fleet Street would have responded to this kind of browbeating by, as a block, all running the story. Sadly, however, the British media, has lost its balls. Instead of reporting, properly, on the preparations for the succession, it has allowed itself to be enlisted in an unconvincing game of Palace make-believe. It’s revealed as a charade, periodically, when exposed to the harsh light of our old friend, reality: a weeping Queen, a bloodshot eye.

We know the King has cancer. We know his treatment is ongoing and expected to last a lifetime. We can see that he is losing weight. We know that Prince Harry, his own son, has said publicly, and with obvious pain, that he doesn’t know “how much longer” his father has left. These are not vague hints. They are explicit indications that Charles’s condition is serious.

The King has demonstrated extraordinary bravery but continuing to report on his health as if he is troubled by nothing more than a mild cold is a disgrace to the proud traditions of the British press. What happened to interrogating power? Why suddenly so deferential, so willfully incurious? The answer is partly commercial. The British press has a great fear of being frozen out by the Palace. Editors know that too much digging, too much honesty, could cost them “access.”

But the public is not stupid. They don’t even need to read between the lines. They see the strain in Camilla’s face, the increasing delegation of duties to Prince William, and the sudden, emotional urgency behind Harry’s attempts to reconcile with his family.

[From The Royalist Substack]

I feel the same way, but I felt that way about Queen Elizabeth’s health as well. It was bizarre to see such an extensive coverup and a studiously incurious press, all for a queen in her 90s who was so visibly unwell. I still remember the nonsense with QEII checking into the hospital in 2021 and staying overnight, and no one was supposed to ask any questions. And the wall-to-wall ableism about QEII’s mobility issues too, like the country couldn’t handle seeing her in a wheelchair. Now it’s about Charles, the Big C and how much longer he really has. These people are heads of state, and it’s crazy that such coverups are allowed.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

49 Responses to “Queen Camilla wept at a mention of King Charles’s cancer on VJ Day”

  1. Eurydice says:

    Well, yeah. As for “the increasing delegation of duties to Prince William,” when have we seen William taking Charles’ place at anything?

    • Jais says:

      Yeah, I haven’t seen any increasing delegation of duties to William. The pope’s funeral maybe but that’s it.

    • Blogger says:

      Tom wishes! 😂

      Willy has been retreating these past two years and visibly shirking from his duties.

    • Snuffles says:

      Willy is going to have a complete breakdown once Charles dies. With all of his huffing and puffing about how he will punish Harry and his family and Andrew, and how he’s going to run things, when the actual reality hits, he’s going to crumble.

      • Blithe says:

        That’s what I’ve been thinking too. The Queen provided a lot of structure for William, for the whole family, and for the institution. Charles provides less than the Queen did, but he’s still adhering to a familiar, mostly working framework. The Queen’s cousins will probably retire soon, and Anne, at some point, will slow down. That will leave fragile, incandescent, damaged William at the helm — without the supports that he clearly needs to function. I don’t see William bringing a lot to the table without Charles to rebel against and with Camilla either checked out or meddling behind the scenes. (Pausing here to check the lyrics to 19th Nervous Breakdown. )

      • one of the marys says:

        I think we’re seeing him crumble now, in real time. Think about all the propaganda over the years about what he’ll do as Prince of wales. Well, we’re seeing it. The Kate crisis and his father’s cancer was the tipping point. He’s on a downward trajectory with no bottom in sight. The only thing that seems to motivate him is his one sided competition with his brother

    • Miss Melissa says:

      When Charles goes, so goes the Monarchy.

      I think everyone knows this.

    • Jaded says:

      More like Williams “dereliction of duties”. Lazy tosser.

  2. JennyJazzhands says:

    My question is: What is the point of threatening to cutoff “access”? And why are the rota willing to squash real stories and journalistic integrity/historic records for this alleged access. I mean, when’s the last time charles, Camilla, William or Kate sat down for an in depth interview?
    What are they getting access to, in exchange for not reporting on anything? The WhatsApp of lies and propaganda?

    • Denise says:

      As an ex journalist, that’s exactly my question. The left behind Windors are boring. Any access they give to Rota is not bringing huge amount if clicks. So they have to rehash Sussexes storylines over and over.
      Isn’t it worth their money to start writing about their scandals again? Especially since so much has happened. I wonder how come Windsors have so much control all of the sudden while it was well known they were always afraid of the press

      • Blogger says:

        They’ve protected Willy all his life and it’s hard to breakaway from that since he decided to brief to them when Meghan came on the scene.

        They need someone to succeed Camilla as palace leaker and it’s Willy boy and Carole.

      • Smart&Messy says:

        Or if they lose access they can just make things up, like they do anyway. On the other hand, I’m not so sure the public is owed any information about their health either. If KC dies tomorrow or in 5 years time, what difference does that make? There are dozens of adults in the line of succession and it’s not like you need any special skills to do this job. When it involves high-stakes diplomacy, No10 takes over or tells the palace exactly what to do. KC’s death or Peg’s abdication or lazy monarching style will not male any difference in the affairs of the UK or the life of its residents.

    • BeanieBean says:

      When did they ever ‘report properly on plans for succession’? They’ve ignored not just Charles, not just Elizabeth, but George VI as well. Although really, what kind of plans–other than the funeral–are required? We all know who’s next, always have.

  3. Yes they sure are secretive about the type of cancer and what treatments he has been receiving. Maybe those tears from Horsilla are a clue to just how bad it is and how long he has left.

    • Noomi says:

      Charles is not obligated to provide any details of his health beyond what he’s already shared and it’s bordering on morbid to speculate on how long he has left. Camilla is not the most revered person but she’s remained by Charles’ side.

      • And yet Pegs gutter rats do it often with Peg soon to be king articles.

      • Jaded says:

        She’s not in a position to bail, although she was vacationing on a huge yacht with her family quite recently.

      • BeanieBean says:

        ‘Remained by his side’…while vacationing on a yacht in Greece? ‘By his side’ while going to a spa in India 4x/year? ‘By his side’ while retreating to her own home, Ray Mill, every weekend?

      • Noomi says:

        Remained by his side for public appearances. I don’t follow her ‘off-duty’ life but from what I’ve seen she usually shows up for royal events.

  4. Amy Bee says:

    No doubt a deal was struck with the press to conceal the Queen’s illness and I suspect the same thing is happening with Charles.

  5. Tessa says:

    Would that Camilla had compassion for Meghan and harry. Never going to happen

    • Libra says:

      Meghan and Harry are living a good life on their own terms. No compassion from Camilla is needed. An apology would be nice.

  6. Blogger says:

    “Sadly, however, the British media, has lost its balls”

    Look in the mirror Tom. You’re Willy’s braying eunuch at this stage 🫏

    Why haven’t you reported on Willy’s freebie yacht? The Wales‘ absence on VJ80? Lazy’s no cancer sicknotes?

  7. Harla says:

    Oh Tom, the British press, yourself included, have lost their interrogation powers and have been willfully incurious about the Left Behind Windsors for at least 8 years now, since they started using the Sussex’s as their human shields. Tom, you are quite aware of this as you play the game yourself so please spare us your self righteous chest thumping and do what you’re accusing others of not, hike up your interrogation powers and become willfully curious about a family who bilk the British public, yourself included, of hundreds of millions of pounds a year.

  8. Tessa says:

    The royal family is falling apart the son and heir refuses to work. Charles cannot control him

    • Lady Digby says:

      Tabs need access and want monarchy to continue so support Will whatever the provocation so far. However, the tabs will spank him if he withdraws totally from public view but no one can actually sack him? We have had a lazy King who abdicated over Wallis but I think he could only have to stand aside If he was physically or mentally unwell to rule? Anybody know if he can be sacked just for attending football matches instead of Opening of Parliament and Remembrance Day? Or can he just do as little as he pleases, the press criticise but it’s just too bad as he can’t be removed full stop? I genuinely believe that Jason has him convinced that he can continue with the life of Riley just tweeting on big occasions and waving from a balcony one a year.

      • Indica says:

        I read…somewhere that the King who abdicated over Wallis absolutely didn’t want to be king at all and was looking for any reason to quit. Wallis was just the ‘oh, this’ll work’ excuse.
        No idea if it’s true or not ’cause I can’t remember where I read it.

      • Tessa says:

        Edward slacked off as king and got bored. He did want to marry wallis.and chose her over being king. He worked a lot more as prince of Wales than huevo tries to do now.

    • Smart&Messy says:

      I’m still not convinced that KC wants WandK to be more visible. He knows he will have a short reign and wants to be the emblematic figure of the monarchy like his mother was. He won’t be anyway but that’s another story. KC is no better than Peg in the sense that he prioritizes his vanity and selfish narcistic grudges over serving the country. That includes his jealousy over Wand K and their kids, not just H and his family.

  9. Lady Digby says:

    Big problem for the Firm is that KC is absolutely doing his best to keep calm and carry on his heir is equally determined not to step up to be counted. I was horrified by Will missing VJ events and I know he’s lazy but in the circumstances he SHOULD have been there for many reasons but above all to reaffirm the reliability of the monarchy. KC may be facing the end of his natural life and his heir should be at his right hand signalling a smooth transition is at hand. Will being glimpsed on fabulous borrowed yachts and now announcing a £16 million mansion to add to his portfolio says playboy rather than knuckling down to supporting his king and father, says it all about his priorities.

  10. Over it says:

    If more vacations and football games were an increase in work delegations,
    Then sureeeee, willy work load is packed . Tom skyes talks about the British press not having the nerve to tell the truth but here he is lying through his tweet about William and Kate and their work load . Also I am still waiting for him to talk about all these vacations they are constantly on

  11. Brassy Rebel says:

    Someone mentioned up top what is it they used to have access to? I’m wondering the same. Hasn’t the media always run interference for certain royals when things get messy? And they have never been transparent about serious health issues. Elizabeth was probably terminal for months before her death. Her father’s death was not really sudden though it is always portrayed that way. So, access to important information is not really the issue. They just want continued access to gossip and hostile leaks about certain exiled royals because they’re the only royals the public retains any interest in.

    • Lady Digby says:

      Also Government helps them out 1976 Palace asked for help as they were going to announce Princess Margaret separation and Harold Wilson agreed to announce his resignation as PM on same day to divide press attention. Upon Margaret’s death a Labour big wig announced today is a good day to bury bad news.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Exactly. The British press has never, ever, done any real reporting on the BRF, preferring to spend their time tapping the phones of celebrities & murder victim’s families & publishing photos of nearly-nude women.

  12. Tis True Tis True says:

    Why aren’t the US press talking about Trump’s obvious mental decline, when they couldn’t stomp talking about Biden’s age? Part of the issue is that the modern 24 hour news cycle doesn’t handle actual news well. Charles’s health has an actual answer. Once the press reports on the truth, there aren’t more stories to milk out of it. But something bullshit, like Will Harry be Invited to Charles’s Funeral, is an easy and evergreen story they can write any day they have nothing better to cover. It’s as much that as some omertà code.

    • Brassy Rebel says:

      The access excuse is very much a trans Atlantic phenomenon.

    • Nerd says:

      The U.S. press doesn’t talk about dictator Trumps declining mental and physical health because Trump has actual power that he isn’t afraid to misuse and dictate what happens here in the U.S. and around the world. Trump can deny actual access to real and important information and events that impact the lives of people all over the world. As others have mentioned, the royals have no real power and anything happening to any of them isn’t as life altering as they want us to believe. Diana’s death was an entirely once in a lifetime thing because her impact was felt all over the world. The same could be said about the Queen although I think that had more to do with her longevity and how most of us had all experienced a life with her in it as monarch. Charles and any of the others won’t be anywhere close to the same level of interest and influence. It will be a sad occasion but no one will think about how they have made a huge difference in the world because of their role. So their argument that they need access to them to tell us that one of them walked into a building today and smiled and waved seems like an exaggerated argument.

    • Nic919 says:

      I agree with this. At this point Charles has cancer, is getting treatment and there is a successor in place. Charles remains of sound mind.

      Meanwhile orange idiot is running the U.S. like a demented man and no one is controlling him.

      Charles isn’t setting up meetings with Putin’s and destroying western diplomacy for the last 80 years.

      The real story is questioning why William has not stepped up to help his father and why Kate keeps using treated cancer as an excuse to not do anything.

      The likely answer to the health condition of Charles is that treatment will keep him going for a few years until it won’t. Not sure what more the press can say about it. He’s said more than they did for the Queen.

      They are missing the fact that the successor and his spouse are not up to the job. That’s the real story Tom.

      • Moondust says:

        I agree with everything you said. Now I know William has a lot of superinjonctions but my understanding is it only applies to England. If the story breaks outside of England then it can also be reported in England. I’m waiting patiently.

  13. Chaine says:

    Cams looks well-put together and the style of this dress suits her much better than the all-to-frequent “housecoats.” The color is good on her, too.

  14. Lady Digby says:

    Tom Sykes and especially the British media should be reporting on actual cost of RF versus real benefit to UK. Do we need a monarch, how about an elected head of state paid a salary who is accountable and can be sacked. In a time of austerity when public funding should be doing the most good, RF is an unneeded extravagance. Or are they needed by the tabs and government of the day as a distraction and click bait? SM repeatedly asked “where is Kate?” last year so even if the Firm shut down BM they can’t control everything like they use to with the threat of removing access? Who cares about access ? The Firm need RR and Amanda Platell following their talking points because one hand washes the other!

  15. K.W. says:

    It’s interesting that Tom Sykes seems to be receiving the Omid Scobie treatment from BP. Maybe he’ll go rogue.

    • jais says:

      How is he getting the Scobie treatment? From what I can tell he still gets updates. I haven’t seen anyone go on BM and complain about Sykes the way in which they did with Omid. I’ll never forget Kate Turly or something like that asking Omid if if he felt like he should apologize to the royals. No, Sykes is not being treated at all like that.

  16. Gurlie says:

    It’s disappointing to know that William will not be the King everyone hopes he will be. I do feel for Charles and if I were Camilla I wouldn’t leave his side if the prognosis is not encouraging. If this is a glimpse in what the future of the monarchy will be, I don’t think the British public will want another King, if Will decides to go M.I.A. like Queen Victoria.

    • Tessa says:

      Charles should worry about alienating the Sussexes and not apologizing to them. I have not had any hope for will since he was allowed to be lazy and then ousted his brother and his family. The monarchists make every excuse for peggs now

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment