MSNBC’s rebranding to MS NOW one of the ‘worst branding disasters in media history’


On Monday, the network soon-to-be formerly-known-as MSNBC announced its new name — My Source News Opinion World, or MS NOW — along with its new non-avian logo, and all of it pretty universally landed with a thud. I watched Rachel Maddow and Lawrence O’Donnell that night to see if either of them would address the rebrand, but they were too classy and stuck to the news. It’s a real achievement on the part of the marketing team, because MSNBC had an underdog/sympathetic edge going into this, due to the fact that NBC decreed to them (but not to CNBC) that they had to cease and desist using “NBC.” Even after they initially promised no one would have to change brand names! But no, instead it’s been a master class in how to underperform in retaliation, to the extent that I’m just imagining a Veep-style cast of characters making these decisions behind the scenes. There are some, however, rising to the occasion of this moment… in the form of excellent burns on the internet waxing on the main theme of this being “one of the worst branding disasters in media history.”

After the cable-news network announced it would become My Source News Opinion World, or MS NOW, later this year, netizens have taken to social media to make their disdain for the name and logo change more than abundantly clear.

The issue, according to the Internet, isn’t just the name, it’s also the look and “feel” of the new logo.

“MSNBC changing its name to MS NOW is one of the worst branding disasters in media history. The logo looks like it belongs on a discount computer from 1998, not a serious news network,” one user wrote. “Absurd.”

…The move conflicts with previous claims made by NBCUniversal that the network would be allowed to keep its name amid the shift. NBC’s iconic peacock logo will no longer be used for the cable-news network, either.

A memo sent Aug. 18 by MSNBC President Rebecca Kutler addressed the flip-flop, writing:

“During this time of transition, NBCUniversal decided that our brand requires a new, separate identity … The future of our success is not tied to remaining within the NBC family and using the peacock as part of our identity,” Rebecca Kutler, MSNBC President, wrote in an Aug. 18 memo addressed to staff.

The peacock-looking logo, according to MSNBC CEO Mark Lazarus, “is synonymous with NBCUniversal, and it is a symbol they have decided to keep within the NBCU family.”

Because of this decision, MSNBC is now free to “chart our own path forward, create distinct brand identities, and establish an independent news organization following the spin.”

MSNBC has certainly ruffled some feathers with the announcement, with netizens posting reactions (complete with GIFs), opinions and critiques about the rebrand, dubbed one of the “worst branding disasters in media history” on X, formerly known as Twitter, in the last 24 hours.

[From USA Today]

The rest of the USA Today article is a round-up of some of the best social media clapbacks, and they are all quite excellent. Like: “MSNBC to changing their name to MS NOW is like HBO changing their name to MAX and facebook changing to Meta and Twitter to X. I will never call it the new name,” followed by a GIF of Gandalf venting on Pippin Took: “Throw yourself in next time and rid us of your stupidity.” Or: “MS NOW sounds like a short-lived Windows operating system from the early 2000s that needlessly redesigned too much and failed to be adopted by a critical mass of users.” Plus: “*adjusting my tie and walking to her table to take my shot* Is there a MISTER NOW, MS NOW?” And: “After MS Now will be MS Go, and then MS Max, and then just MS.” There really is a wealth of creativity out there.

So in conclusion, the rebrand sucks on name, logo, and execution fronts. (Otherwise known as all fronts.) I said on Tuesday, and I know I’m not the only one, that the name reads like Multiple Sclerosis NOW. In regard to the logo, call me petty and/or vindictive, but I think they totally missed an opportunity to get back at NBC. How? By making their new logo another bird! Owls have symbolism related to knowledge, yes? Though coming out of November 2024, an ostrich may be more fitting.

Photos via YouTube and Instagram

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

22 Responses to “MSNBC’s rebranding to MS NOW one of the ‘worst branding disasters in media history’”

  1. Eurydice says:

    I don’t know why, but that logo reminds of something you’d buy through AARP.

  2. Abby says:

    the logo and font look like something to appeal to boomers (no offense to boomers), reminds me of OAN, which is not something I think they’re aiming for???

    • Kitten says:

      YES logo is very cheap-looking, like a RW news source that’s just starting out.

    • Bqm says:

      OAN was exactly what I was thinking of.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Sigh. I don’t know why us boomers are always getting thrown under the bus. There’s nothing about that stupid logo that says ‘boomer’. It’s just bad. It’s all bad. I will say the responses to this stupidity do give us the best of social media–they’re hella creative! Too bad MSNBC didn’t just send out a tweet asking for ideas before coming up with this crapola.

  3. Nicki says:

    Yeah all I see is multiple sclerosis. Immediately made me think of the Big Bang Theory episode when the Physics Bowl team named themselves PMS (Perpetual Motion Squad)

  4. Gabby says:

    The logo is awful. It looks like they are trying to imitate Fox News. And “MS Now” sounds like a juvenile marketing campaign. Do they think this will keep the orange fool off their backs?

  5. SJP-NYC says:

    As someone with multiple sclerosis this makes me so cringe.

    • Nanny to the Rescue says:

      I was just posting about this association when I saw your reply. That was my first thought too, and I think MS standing for multiple sclerosis is commonly used.

      Also, if you put “opinion” in your name, as a news source, you automatically sound biased.

      Weird rebranding through and through.

    • Bqm says:

      The original MS in MSNBC was because they were originally linked with Microsoft. That’s gone so they should’ve ditched it entirely.

  6. DianeS says:

    All the rebranding in the world isn’t going to change the fact that the capitulation to the regime has begun.

    • Betsy says:

      Yes, the stupid capitulation is the most irritating part of this but that logo is seriously bad. That looks like something I could make and I am NOT gifted when it comes to that kind of design. It’s just bad. And it looks like OAN like someone said.

    • BeanieBean says:

      That’s what it is, obeying in advance. And they folded so easily!

  7. Chaine says:

    I’m with everyone that immediately thinks of multiple sclerosis. Am I wrong in thinking that, if this new name for the network sticks and people get inured to it, it could undercut marketing for multiple sclerosis funding organizations?!! Bad look all around for the network.

  8. Margo says:

    Why didn’t they just go fully retro and rebrand to MySpace?

  9. Bqm says:

    Even just using NOW wouldn’t have been bad. Three letters is pretty standard. CNN, FOX, OAN. There’s no l9nger any affiliation with Microsoft so why keep the MS at all?

    NOTHING will ever be worse than Twitter/X though. That’s billions in lost brand ID. Facebook is still Facebook, it’s just under Meta. Like MSNBC under nbc. But Twitter involved tweeting and tweets too. Whole new words.

  10. Laurielee says:

    I truly hate when marketing uses “my” our “your” or other terms focused on a single person. I feel like in the late 90’s someone in marketing somewhere decided that framing things on individuals was the way to sell stuff, and it hasn’t gone away. Everything is about “this is for YOU”, “you are special”, etc. Having “MY source” in the name of a freaking news organization is just horrible. News has nothing to do with me, why is this “my” source. It’s so stupid and just supports people being selfish and naval-gazing. Not sure I explained this right, I have trouble articulating what about this makes me so crazy.

  11. anon1234 says:

    I live in Mississippi and we have MSNewsNow, where the MS stands for Mississippi of course. I legit thought *they* had rebranded and couldn’t figure out what else they must have done for it to be national news. Like did they rebrand bc the boss is yet another powerful pedo or what? And then it turns out MSNBC is just committing an easily avoidable own goal.

    You do not want your identity to be mixed up with Mississippi’s in any way. MS NOW is just stupid from the jump and I still think Mississippi when I see it. MS will always be the postcode, and it’s used as shorthand for the state for tons of stuff – especially infographics like we see in the constant deluge of political news. The rebrand is muddying and even the most junior marketing person can tell you that’s always bad.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment