Telegraph: King Charles is ‘reshaping the monarchy’ already, Scooter King

The third anniversary of QEII’s death and King Charles’s accession went by in September with very little dedicated commentary. It’s because there was such a flurry of activity that particular week, with Prince Harry visiting the UK and all of the Windsors desperately trying to look busy. So… it’s curious timing for this piece to pop up right now. From the Telegraph, “How King Charles is reshaping the monarchy.” It was published a day after Prince William’s interview on The Reluctant Traveler dropped, wherein “Scooter King” William hemmed and hawed about all of the changes he’s going to make when he’s king. Is this Charles flexing and saying “not yet, Huevo?” Perhaps. Some highlights:

What Charles was doing as Scooter King’s episode came out: As sound bites of the interview went out, and headlines were drawn up, King Charles was finishing up a dinner at Dumfries House.Held in honour of his King’s Foundation, it celebrated the young people the Foundation teaches to find new and interesting ways of preserving traditional crafts and fashion. The contrast, in some senses, could not have been sharper: the current King delighting in the past, a future King deliberately looking forward. Except for one small detail. As he made his way around the room to congratulate the under-35s he was hosting, King Charles delightedly called them “changemakers”.

Charles’s evolving reign: [His reign is] a bridge between old and new, formality and informality, as head of state and a human being. It is, they hope, a new style of monarchy. The plan was to demonstrate that the King was “Sovereign, servant and son”. In other words, he was the King, ready to serve the nation, and “mourner-in-chief” for his mother, bringing stability when the national mood felt unsettled by the death of Elizabeth II. All three needed to happen as a “tripod”, one familiar with accession planning says now. “If one of three legs went wonky, the whole thing might become unstable.”

It’s like Doctor Who: “It’s a bit like Doctor Who,” a senior aide said recently. “The next one that comes along has to be completely different but a bit the same. The institution regenerates itself.” “That’s how it survives,” another palace insider told me. “Being both the same and different. The mistake some people made was to think that he [King Charles] could be, or would want to be, the same as his mother. It’s a bit like the Doctor Who regeneration. At the start, everyone says the new one isn’t like the old one so we don’t like it. And then when the next one comes around, it’s the same thing all over again. It’s essential that the Royal family continues to evolve and it will do so again into the next reign.”

Urgent family issues: The “question” of the Duke of York (and now his ex-wife) has emphatically moved to be the “problem” of the Yorks. The bubbling narrative about the return of the Duke of Sussex requires attention. Sally Bedell Smith, royal biographer and now writer of the Royal Extra Substack, argues that the King “needs to be decisive” about the “constant vexation” brought by his brother and his younger son, before it is left to a future King William. “I really think he has an obligation to step up in that way,” she says. “Particularly with Andrew, he needs to take some action: finding a mechanism to get him out of Royal Lodge, initiating a process of an Act of Parliament to remove his title, something.”

[From The Telegraph]

Again, this is the kind of piece that should have been published alongside Charles’s Accession Day anniversary. Did they hold it for a few weeks and then drop it conveniently alongside Scooter King’s sad interview on purpose? The thing is, while I think Charles is a terrible father and a pretty sh-tty person to his family, I cannot deny that he’s actually doing a pretty good job as king. As it turns out, he’s great at many aspects of the job. This nagging issue of “something must be done about Harry” highlights the greatest failing of Charles’s reign though: he’s been such a bad father to both of his sons, he will leave a huge mess behind when he passes away. William is unprepared intellectually and emotionally for the job, and Charles’s failure to prepare Peg and rein him in will do immense damage in the long run. Charles’s jealousy towards Harry and Meghan and his behavior towards them overall is a huge problem for his reign and beyond.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “Telegraph: King Charles is ‘reshaping the monarchy’ already, Scooter King”

  1. Tessa says:

    Sally Smith needs to keep quiet. Charles evicted Harry Meghan and their children and refuses to give harry full security protection smith has the gall to put harry in same category as Andrew
    Charles won’t punish Andrew. Befell smith gaslit Diana and I could never stand her since. I wonder why huevo keeps getting away with the when I am king talk. Charles could stop it

    • jais says:

      Yep, Charles refuses to give Harry and his family security. Other countries were told not to protect Harry and his family. Celebrating crafts and artists is a lovely thing for the king to do. But none of to matters bc he will be known for actively endangering his son and grandchildren. That’s what he’ll be remembered for.

      • Lawrenceville says:

        This right here☝🏾. Charles will always have Diana’s shadow follow and/or hang over him till the day he goes to his grave. And his reign will always be remembered by how he treated Harry and his wife and children, how he endangered them and continuously refused to protect his son and his little family from danger. No amount of good deeds to strangers will ever erase that. Charles is still being pointed at, almost 30 years later, as the one that engineered Diana’s death. To some people, nothing he does will ever erase the fact that Charles yanked Diana’s security protection, lied about how she was the one that refused protection, and then Diana turning up dying mysteriously in a car accident that she had already said Charles was planning to end her life in just a few months earlier. And then fast forward 20 years later, Charles pulls Harry’s security protection, lies about how he was still paying for it, expose Harry, Meghan and Archie’s hideout location in BC, orders RAVEC to yank Harry’s protection in the UK, attempt to end Harry, Meghan and Doria’s lives the same way Diana died but this time not in Paris but in NYC, calls every country Harry and Meghan visit and urges them to give the Sussexes no protection. Nothing Charles will ever do will erase all this; he will go down in history as the man that was so jealous of his late wife and of own child that he (allegedly murdered Diana and) attempted hits on his own child’s life and his little family numerous times. That is Charles’ legacy. No amount of good works at that King’s trust will be remembered more than how he treated Diana and Harry.

  2. Tis True Tis True says:

    And his jealousy of the attention paid to Diana, which led to casting her aside, is the source of the problems with his sons. It’s Charles’s inability to rein in himself that will be the undoing of the Windsors.

  3. NotMika says:

    Sorry, did anyone ASK for a reshaped monarchy?

    Because im pretty sure the people who like it like it how it is – pantyhose and tea towels and all that – and the people who don’t like it, want it gone.

  4. Giddyi says:

    Meanwhile the Scooter King, the ultimate nepo baby, shouts NO! I will be the one changing the monarchy, not you!”

  5. ParkRunMum says:

    This is to reply to @notmika, I think you’ve got it!! Charles wants to put his stamp on it, William wants to put his stamp on it, it’s like a pissing contest between two dogs. Meanwhile, you never heard QEII talk that way, and yet, her influence is indelible & likely to outlast & overshadow both her errant heirs. Funny.

  6. Amy Bee says:

    I guess this is BP complaining and explaining that Charles is a King of change.

  7. Magdalena says:

    “Changemakers”, eh? Something else cribbed from the daughter-in-law he wilfully endangers. Meghan really is the blueprint for these leftovers.

  8. Blubb says:

    Charles is a good king? Really?
    I bet one day we will know how much corruption there really is behind the kings foundation.
    His corruption, helping his paedos friends, destroying medicine for homeopathy, his ecological hypocrisy and how many children did he ever helped so they won’t go hungry?

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment