David Dimbleby, the historian and broadcaster, made a documentary called What’s the Monarchy For? The Windsors are absolutely furious about it, but they can’t attack Dimbleby directly, nor can they dispute much of the documentary on the record, because it might lend credence to it (plus, I think Dimbleby’s program is largely truthful). So what’s happening is so funny and predictable – royal sources and courtiers are huffing and puffing behind the scenes, which spurs on the royal reporters to fall all over themselves defending the Windsors. But they’re also doing that thing particular to British reporting – acting huffy about one thing, then slyly quoting the Windsors’ biggest critics. Here’s part of the Telegraph’s piece about whether Dimbleby was accurate when he said that King Charles is the first British billionaire king.
“How is the Royal family making more money than ever?” asks David Dimbleby, in his new BBC documentary on the monarchy. “And are they worth it?” The programme claims that for the first time, the British monarch has private wealth exceeding £1bn, citing estimates by the Guardian that King Charles’s personal assets are worth around £1.8bn.
Such claims surfacing in a Left-wing newspaper, as they did two years ago, is one thing. That they have now been given prominence and apparent credence by Britain’s public service broadcaster, conveyed to the nation by one of the corporation’s most respected presenters, is quite another. It’s telling, at a time of declining support for the monarchy, that republicans immediately seized on Dimbleby’s remarks, conscious that wealth is increasingly becoming a dirty concept among the young in particular.
On Wednesday, Narinder Kaur, the television presenter, delighted in objecting to a picture showing the sinful double whammy of the King knighting Jeremy Hunt, the Conservative former health secretary. “Rewarded for making Britain poorer by a king who is now a billionaire,” she said. “Proper kick in the teeth for the working class of Britain.”
“I think the current £1.8bn for Charles’s wealth is an underestimate,” says Norman Baker, the anti-monarchy former Lib Dem minister and author of Royal Mint, National Debt: The Shocking Truth About the Royals’ Finances. “I’d put it somewhere closer to £2.5bn because we don’t know the extent of his investment income. There’s no question Charles is a billionaire.”
Republicans have identified Charles’s wealth as a promising target for attacks, with the Royal family recently wounded by scandals surrounding Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former Duke of York, and public support for the monarchy having dropped from 75 per cent in 2012 to 62 per cent now. Now, they’ve been given a helping hand from a surprising corner.
The King, said Dimbleby, “inherited more wealth than any monarch for generations”. It is true that over the course of his mother’s life, the Windsor monarchy was able to accumulate wealth through property, private collections, investments and the duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, which control vast amounts of land and property. Coupled with these assets and revenues, the monarchy’s exemption from inheritance tax and other tax arrangements meant that when Charles took his place on the throne, he became Britain’s first private billionaire monarch, according to the Guardian data cited by Dimbleby.
“The King’s personal wealth is accumulating with businesses run for private gain,” says Ed Owens, a historian of the modern monarchy. “He and his family collect priceless gifts, racehorses and art and the question is always, does this belong to an individual or the nation? We are living in an increasingly divided country. Among the younger generation who view extremes of wealth negatively, being a billionaire is a problem for the King.”
I’m sure there are a number of people who simply hate billionaires, but I think Charles’s billionaire status is much more complicated than that. It’s the fact that A) he inherited all of it tax-free, B) there is still so much mystery about royal finances overall, and C) what little people do know of royal wealth, it looks like it comes from screwing over taxpayers, slumlording and making vital services “pay” various duchies. But yes, overall… Charles is a billionaire. QEII was as well. The Scooter King will inherit it all, and I hope that’s the end of the line for all of this.
Photos courtesy of Avalon Red.
- King Charles and Queen Camilla leave Westminster Abbey after his coronation. 6 May 2023,Image: 774204704, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: -, Model Release: no, Credit line: Jack Hill / Avalon
- King Charles III leaves Westminster Abbey after his Coronation, London, United Kingdom, on 06 May 2023.,Image: 774228682, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: -, Model Release: no, Credit line: Dan Charity / Avalon
- His Majesty The King Charles III photographed as the Royal Family gather on the balcony following the Coronation of Their Majesties King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Buckingham Palace in London, UK on 06 May 2023.,Image: 774233000, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: , Model Release: no, Credit line: Julie Edwards / Avalon
- Hugo Burnand/Royal Household 2023. EDITORIAL USE ONLY. This photograph shall not be used after 2259hrs GMT on December 31, 2023, without prior, written permission from Royal Communications. After that date further licensing terms will be available. The new photographs are made available for editorial purposes, charities and not-for-profit organisations. The copyright of the photographs is vested in Buckingham Palace and Hugo Burnand. Publications are asked to credit the photograph to Hugo Burnand. Terms of use must be strictly adhered to. The photographs will be available for press usage until 2259hrs GMT, Sunday December 31, 2023 The photographs are being made available by way of licence on condition that: The photographs shall be solely for news editorial use only. The photographs should be used only in the context of Their Majesties’ Coronation. The photograph is provided to you strictly on condition that these conditions and restrictions will apply (and that you will pass these on) to any organisation to whom you supply it. There shall be no commercial use whatsoever of the photograph (including by way of example only) any use in merchandising, advertising or any other non-news editorial use. The photograph must not be digitally enhanced, manipulated or modified in any manner or form. King Charles III, the Prince of Wales and Prince George on the day of the coronation in the Throne Room at Buckingham Palace, London. The King is pictured in full regalia and is wearing The Robe of Estate, the Imperial State Crown and is holding the Sovereign’s Orb and Sovereign’s Sceptre with Cross. He is seated on one of a pair of 1902 throne chairs that were made for the future King George V and Queen Mary for use at the Coronation of King Edward VII. These throne chairs were also used in the background of the 1937 Coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth and King Charles III and Queen Camilla at Westminster Hall to receive addresses from the S,Image: 775555336, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: PICTURE DESK USE ONLY. HANDOUT. MANDATORY CREDIT: Hugo Burnand EDITORIAL USE ONLY This photograph can not be used after 2259hrs GMT on December 31, 2023, without prior, written permission from Royal Communications., Model Release: no, Credit line: Hugo Burnand/Royal Household 2023/PA Media / Avalon
- King Charles III speaking at the State Banquet for President of France Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte Macron, at Windsor Castle, Berkshire, on day one of the French President’s state visit to the UK. Picture date: Tuesday July 8, 2025.,Image: 1019896100, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: Aaron Chown/Avalon
- WINDSOR, ENGLAND – DECEMBER 03: King Charles III (second right) and Queen Camilla (R) with the President of the Federal Republic of Germany Frank-Walter Steinmeier and his wife Elke Büdenbender with Catherine, Princess of Wales and Prince William, Prince Of Wales (far left) as they watch a military procession during the ceremonial welcome for the state visit to the UK at Windsor Castle on December 03, 2025 in Windsor, England. The President of the Federal Republic of Germany, accompanied by Ms. Elke Büdenbender, are paying a State Visit to the United Kingdom as the guests of Their Majesties The King and Queen. The visit is the first from Germany in 27 years and will be marked with ceremonial visits, an address to the UK parliament and a banquet.,Image: 1056240126, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: Carl Court/Avalon
- WINDSOR, ENGLAND – DECEMBER 03: King Charles III (second right) and Queen Camilla (R) with the President of the Federal Republic of Germany Frank-Walter Steinmeier and his wife Elke Büdenbender with Catherine, Princess of Wales and Prince William, Prince Of Wales (far left) as they watch a military procession during the ceremonial welcome for the state visit to the UK at Windsor Castle on December 03, 2025 in Windsor, England. The President of the Federal Republic of Germany, accompanied by Ms. Elke Büdenbender, are paying a State Visit to the United Kingdom as the guests of Their Majesties The King and Queen. The visit is the first from Germany in 27 years and will be marked with ceremonial visits, an address to the UK parliament and a banquet.,Image: 1056240254, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: Carl Court/Avalon
- Britain’s King Charles III (2R) and his wife Britain’s Queen Camilla (R) walk with Germany’s President Frank-Walter Steinmeier (C) and his wife Elke Buedenbender as they arrive to attend a State Banquet at Windsor Castle in Windsor, on December 3, 2025, the first day of a three day state visit by the German President. President Frank-Walter Steinmeier received a ceremonial welcome to Britain Wednesday as his state visit got into full swing — the first by Germany’s official head of state in 27 years.,Image: 1056322176, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: CARLOS JASSO/Avalon
- Britain’s King Charles III, Germany’s President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, and Britain’s Catherine, Princess of Wales toast their glasses after the King delivered a speech during a State Banquet at Windsor Castle in Windsor, on December 3, 2025, the first day of a three day state visit by the German President. President Frank-Walter Steinmeier received a ceremonial welcome to Britain Wednesday as his state visit got into full swing — the first by Germany’s official head of state in 27 years.,Image: 1056322311, License: Rights-managed, Restrictions: *** NO UK USE FOR 48 HRS ***, Model Release: no, Credit line: CARLOS JASSO/Avalon






















I think if Queen Victoria’s personal fortune were valued at today’s currency she’d be twice as wealthy as Charles.
Losing India really took a chunk of change out of the RF’s nest egg
To think Charles is anything but a billionaire, is silly to me. Of course he’s a billionaire.
Yet he claimed had no money for Meghan.
We all know why.
While I think that family is racist as hell, I believe Charles and the Firm needed Harry and Meghan to burn through their money – Meghan’s savings and Harry’s inheritance from Diana. Financial abuse/control is very much a part of that family’s dynamic. William wouldn’t be able to control them if they had access to other funds.
Bingo!
It’s unbelievable that he said that.
The PR people really boofed it. If you’re old enough to remember the RF in the 1980s, you might remember the messaging / popular belief about their wealth. It was very different: the queen was portrayed as doing it only for the duty, living in a drafty and rodent infested castle, for only a meagre annual sum. Anne couldn’t even afford new clothes!
We were told that the yacht Britannia was yes, ostentatious but that wasn’t TQ’s choice; it had to be fancy to impress visiting dignitaries. More of a heavy and slightly embarrassing burden
In other words they were smart enough to manage the messaging and be discreet with their outsized wealth. This group seems to have missed that memo and/ or lacks the skills and awareness to do the same.
I remember a story from the early 90’s that said QEII was the 5th richest person in the world worth 5 billion after the sultan of Bruni. so i reckon with how wealth has climbed in the last 20yrs i reckon she was way up there before she died. The Sovereign Grant was established in 2011 where they agreed to replace other funding methods and consoildate things into one package grant for the Monarch’s official duties and palace maintenance.
I remember that, too. That prompted the usual articles–but it’s not personal wealth, it’s the Crown, etc., etc., etc. No, she personally was that stinking rich & now her son is. We’ll see how Billy Boy handles his inheritance.
To paraphrase that old monarchist and colonialist, Winston Churchill, I think when it comes to the monarchy, “This may not be the beginning of the end, but it is surely the end of the beginning.” If you look hard enough, you can see the British public waking up to the fact that they are being systematically royally screwed.
Of course he is. And knowing that he still wouldn’t help support Meghan and Harry when they got engaged then married makes his excessive wealth even more disgusting. Trashy old man.
Working royals have commercial enterprises. For example, the duchies generate over £50m annually for Charles and William (personal income exempt from corporation tax and capital gains tax).
Anne’s Gatcombe Park is run as a business and Edward earns income by renting out stables. BP, KP and Highgrove have gift shops flogging all sorts. Not all profits go to charity, some pay for things the royal family would otherwise have to fund out of their own pockets.
And Balmoral and Sandringham also have gift shops that help towards the running of these estates – selling luxury items like King’s whisky for £100 and woollen blankets for £200. Just a few examples.
Then you should see what the non-working royals get up to (several with titles and HRHs, btw). Which is why it’s so outrageous for the Sussexes to be criticised.
Look, I think billionaires and (GASP) Trillionaires should be taxed. It is unethical and downright evil that they don’t pay their fair share. Saying that, at least El0n and Drumpf and the Amazon King aren’t being paraded around as bastions of American culture. At least we aren’t being sold a bucket of lies saying they are the reason why other people visit america….
They are stealing from us every day but at least we don’t have to bow when we see them. It seems INSANE to me that the British public has to deal with these morons. Again- I am appauled by our billionaires and I think that unless you have a “good” one like Pritzker or McKenzie…they are pure f-ing evil. How else can you justify not ending world hunger with a FRACTION of your wealth? How can you justify not paying your fair share of taxes *which would STILL LEAVE YOU A BILLIONAIRE* – resulting in children starving? They know they are letting kids die. They know they are preventing humanity from living in a peaceful world. They KNOW they are destroying the Earth for future generations and they dont give a Sh*t. That makes them evil.
Now back to the Monarchy – they have all of this and they didn’t have to lift a finger to get it. It was inherited wealth that came from slavery, the absolute exploitation of their own population, and crime. It is disgusting and the fact that they walk around in tiaras and pretend they are justified for doing so is beyond cringe.
I hope one day American billionaires and millionaires finally are forced to pay their fair share and I hope the Monarchy ends for the British people….and may all that wealth be given back to the people from whom it was stollen.
*sorry rant over*
Preach!
The BRF has spent years – decades, maybe longer – purposely muddying the water on what they actually own. Something often brought up (even on here) in their defense is that things are “crown property” not the personal property of the monarch. But its not like the people benefit from the priceless tiaras, whether the Crown owns them or the monarch personally. And William and Kate may be paying market rate but they’re decorating the house from the royal warehouses – what are those items considered? Crown or personal? If Crown property, the wales sure feel comfortable using those things for their private home where they will never host receptions etc. And what about the furniture and decor at Sandringham?
That’s without getting into the land, the jewelry, the houses (how much are Sandringham and Balmoral worth??) the horses etc. AND without getting into the off shore investments!!!
And the tax benefits!!