Angelina Jolie signs with Ryan Gosling’s agent, seeks more diverse work

wenn3337371

For me, Angelina Jolie has always gotten extra points for being a rare Hollywood star who doesn’t have a “team” of sycophants and handlers “managing” her every whim. She’s always had a manager – Geyer Kosinski – who she’s been with for probably 15 or 16 years. She has a lawyer or two, and that’s it. When she started up with Brad in 2005, she took meetings around Hollywood to see if she could/should sign with an agency, and she ended up hiring CAA. It was not a good fit, and Jolie ended up firing CAA in early 2006 – some say she quit the agency in a fit of pregnancy hormones and because she’s never liked to be micromanaged, which CAA is famous for. Since that 2006 fit, Jolie has just stuck with Kosinski as her sole representation in Hollywood – no agent, no publicist, no “team”.

That’s just changed, though. According to The Hollywood Reporter, Jolie just signed on with Ilene Feldman at IFA Talent because she wants to get more diverse work. Interesting.

Angelina Jolie has added a talent agent to her team of representatives. The actress-filmmaker has signed with Ilene Feldman at IFA Talent, who also represents Ryan Gosling, among others.

The last time Jolie had acting representation by a talent agency was in 2006, when she was with CAA (a stint that lasted 13 months). In March, she signed with UTA to rep her as a writer and director but not as an actor. She continues to be with her longtime manager Geyer Kosinski at Media Talent Group and attorney Robert Offer of Sloane Offer Weber & Dern.

Sources say IFA will help Jolie, arguably the biggest female star in the world, find roles in smaller, independently financed films, not studio tentpoles or franchises.

The move comes just over month before the release of Jolie’s directorial debut, In the Land of Blood and Honey, which she also wrote. Jolie has spent the past several years acting in big studio movies such as The Tourist, Salt and Wanted, and has lent her voice to the mega-grossing Kung Fu Panda movies.

Her last dramas were 2008’s The Changeling and 2007’s A Mighty Heart, the former earning her an Oscar nomination. She won the best supporting actress statuette for 1999’s Girl, Interrupted.

[From The Hollywood Reporter]

Part of me is disappointed. Part of Jolie’s appeal (to me) is that she proves that someone with intelligence and talent can excel in Hollywood without having some epic “industry” of people working on her behalf. I mean, what’s next? Will Jolie hire a publicist? Nooo!

But what this is probably really about is Angelina aging in the industry. She knows that she’s not always going to be getting the biggest and best scripts in Hollywood, and although she’s one of the few female stars who can single-handedly get a film financed and made, Jolie is smart enough to know that this too shall pass. She’s looking into the future and she sees fewer roles where she’s jumping off of overpasses onto moving vehicles and more work where she’s the supporting player in a medium-sized ensemble, or the lead in a small film. It’s smart, sure. But I wonder if she would have been able to make that transition without an agent?

wenn3344879

fp_7913590_big_jolieangelina_01_13

fp_7834977_big_pittjolie_kids_13_22

Photos courtesy of WENN.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

149 Responses to “Angelina Jolie signs with Ryan Gosling’s agent, seeks more diverse work”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Marni says:

    Everybody needs a helping hand every now and then, even the great Angelia Jolie.

  2. truthSF says:

    Smart move if you ask me. Facing reality is a whole lot better then living in denial with an inflated ego.

  3. Addie says:

    Was watching a few interviews of Angie pre Brad/ after Maddox was adopted, and it made me miss THAT woman.

    She is still great, but being with Brad just changed her in some way I can’t really explain, and because of the tabloid circus it caused, she has definatly become more guarded and less natural around media.

    Anywhoo, if anyone needs to get an agent again, it’s Brad. He should never speak without Angie or a proffesional agent ok’ing his comments.

  4. tapioca says:

    Good for her. She showed acting chops in A Mighty Heart and anything that stops her playing ridiculous Waif-Fu characters in action films that would have been fab with a realistic lead actress is great news.

  5. Anna says:

    I’ve been waiting for her to do something like this for years. No more action crap. It’s going to be tough though because there aren’t that many leading roles for women her age in the indie world so someone is going to have to make it for her.

  6. Bite me says:

    Smart move for La Jolie 🙂

  7. I.want.shoes says:

    I think she is trying to diversify her work and move away from action movies such as Salt, Wanted, etc. Smart move.

  8. Original Chloe ) says:

    Yeah, I’d love to see her in some smaller movies now, with directors utilizing her acting range a bit more.

  9. pwal says:

    Good move on her part. Although Angelina has a rep of saying what she means and meaning what she says, maybe small indie film producers won’t believe her if she merely say that she wants to do smaller, indie films.

  10. Canuck says:

    If she didn’t need an agent before and she does now, it’s because she simply not getting any offers. No matter how they try to spin it.

    If she’s so in demand especially after those masterpieces of acting such as A Mighty Heart, The Changeling, that one she did with Damon etc, shouldn’t she just be able to more or less snap her fingers saying “I want to play complex characters, not GI Joe in a dress” and the offers will fall into her lap like rain?

    Her explanation for taking an agent is a bit thin, methinks…

  11. LadyJane says:

    Two words: The Tourist

  12. mln76 says:

    Really smart move hopefully like Brad she’ll do better work as she ages and not resort to the commercial drivel. I like that Angie can kick ass but as a longtime fan I love that she can act.

  13. Edita says:

    Finally! So happy about this. Quality not quantity, Angelina.

    The director of the Tourist, Forian von Donnersmarck, said she gets sent every script with a female lead aged 18 – 40. The agency will her help to sort out the best ones, which she may would overlook otherwise.

    She doesn’t need their help with the big films and franchises. She isn’t turning her back on her big projects. She just wants to find good, small, character driven dramas in addition to the big movies.

  14. shay kay says:

    I can’t see Angelina playing an ordinary woman dealing with life little tragedies and triumphs. Girl Interrupted is the only ensemble piece I’ve ever seen her do and that character was hardly normal.
    I thought she was up to do Cleopatra next? I can completely see her in that role.
    I will be interested to see which indie scripts interest her at this point in her life. Maybe she’s been there, done that with the action roles and age is obviously a factor with those and between Gia and Girl Interrupted she’s covered the drug abusing, mentally unstable dynamic.I haven’t seen The Changling or A Mighty Heart but those were not ordinary situations either.
    Angelina is very self aware and has made a good choice to change up her acting resume. I’m impressed that she has decided to forgo the big budgets and top billing at this stage in her career.

  15. Marni says:

    @Canuck
    You have a point. People keep saying she can get any role she wants, obviously thats not the case if she needs an agent.
    I wonder if indie movie makers would want her in their movies. She has been type cast as the ‘action women’, this plus her beauty was a theme of criticism (by some critics) in her role in Changeling.
    Then theres the fact that she is Angelina Jolie, the world famous actor, mother, charity worker and partner to Brad Pitt. Audiences sometimes find it hard to look past that and to the character she is playing.
    I wouldnt be suprised if some indie movie makers pass on Angelina so that their ‘story’ shines instead. Some though might go with Angelina just for the box office draw she is meant to be.

  16. Franny says:

    what it must be like to look like her. i wouldn’t step away from the mirror I don’t think.

  17. dede says:

    Canuck you are funny..any movie industry exc will tell you Jolie can get any role she desires..this talent agency will sort through the roles for her and find the best one..i know your obsessed self has read all AJ interviews on Fuglyfemales so you would know that she says her manager and Brad usually read through the scripts she is given, now the agency will..the common sense you lack is hilarious..no one wants to hire AJ whose last two movies grossed more than 250mil each and the former movie she carried BY HERSELF unlike others

  18. pamela says:

    Canuck, do you EVER take a break? My God, you were on here ALL DAY yesterday writing several dissertations, and yet here you are again, bright and early, (or whatever time it is whereever you are) Are you on someone’s payroll? Don’t you have a hobby? Doesn’t this constant hate drain your energy? What a life you must live.

  19. dede says:

    I wonder what Canuck will do if angie’s directorial debut ITLOBH gets high praises from critics and wins the GG for foreign language film like Letters to Iwo Jima did a few years ago..methinks her and her posse from fuglyfemales will grow green with envy..Go AJ!

  20. Zigggy says:

    I’d love to see her in jeans.

  21. The Original Mia says:

    Smart move by a smart lady.

  22. Canuck says:

    @Marni: The beauty thing… Kidman won an Oscar when she “uglied” herself for a role. Theron won an Oscar when she did the same. The only thing stopping Jolie from accepting a role in which she doesn’t rely on her face is Jolie. So far… hasn’t happened. And I’d be more than a lot surprised if she hadn’t had scripts like that land in her lap.

  23. Canuck says:

    @dede: she has no upcoming filming schedule any time in the near future, surely she has more time than usual to read scripts these days? Spin it how you like, you don’t fork over a bunch of money to an agency just so they can read scripts for you. She could hire a secretary for whole lot less to do exactly the same thing.

  24. seri says:

    Good move for Angie.
    And I was just thinking Canuck must be hired by someone, but somehow, I get the imgage of an awe-inspiringly obese individual with greasy stringy thinning hair hanging over their multiple chins; scowling bitterly into their computer monitor; a phone that no one ever calls gathering dust in the corner; 500 cats sh*tting on the floor, unnoticed.

  25. taylor says:

    I think it’s a good move, both because she’s aging, and because she seems to want to do less “in front” camera work. Maybe she’s actually hoping for smaller roles, and she’s not getting sent those scripts?
    Also, I would think she needs an agent just because if she is getting sent every script (which seems likely), she’s WAY too busy to actually read through them. In fact with that in mind, I’m a little surprised she didn’t get one sooner, but maybe the CAA experience was just too distasteful for her.

  26. ladybert62 says:

    Trampie wants more diverse roles?

    I think she wants any role since she doesnt seem to have anything in the works right now.

  27. Cheyenne says:

    Oh for heaven’s sake, Canuck, give it up. Angie can make any movie she wants. She puts butts in theater seats. Her movies have made over $5 billion. The studios love her. Unlike an aging sitcom actress who is past her time and is too full of herself to realize it, Angie recognizes that her days of starring in action movies are behind her and she wants to concentrate on smaller, more dramatic films. Smart move on her part.

    Do yourself and the rest of us a favor and find another hobby. Read a good book or something. The hatefest is getting older than dirt.

  28. SEF says:

    Don’t you think that, with SIX kids and a whirlwind career, she just needs HELP? I would!!! People to help read scripts, etc? I don’t think that’s a sellout as Kaiser suggests. I’d call that smart.

  29. yuya says:

    Canuck….are you forgetting “A mighty heart”? She was NOT ATTRACTIVE in that role.

  30. Cheyenne says:

    @seri: Thanks for starting my morning off with the best laugh I’ve had all week.
    😆

  31. Canuck says:

    @dede19: I would be amazed, since it won’t actually qualify as an entry. It would have to actually play in BiH before the end of the year and that doesn’t seem to be on the schedule…

  32. Maya says:

    She’s a good actress, and I like in her in general, but she has chosen some pretty bad projects in the past, so maybe this will help with that.

  33. olivia says:

    She screeched and pouted her way through her career. Her career highs were for playing mentally unbalanced characters, i.e. HERSELF. She relied on her looks which are now ravaged. She cannot do theatre or television. She can’t play that action heroine anymore..she is to old and to anorexic looking. She can’t do comedy. She can’t do romantic thrillers, she can’t do drama/period pieces, she isn’t believable in the femme fatale genre……so what’s left? Nada. BTW…when exactly does filming begin on that epic movie Cleopatra?

  34. pwal says:

    Funny… if Hilary Swank would’ve made this decision, she could’ve avoided that Chechnya embarrassment.

    But yeah… Angelina should be hanging her head about this… Marty Feldman eyeroll…

  35. dede says:

    No worries Canuck..GK and Film District know what they are doing..and im 100% they know the GG rules so I wouldnt be surprised if it were released in Bosnia

  36. Julie says:

    I don’t know when that first pic was taken but God she was beautiful then.

  37. Bite me says:

    Julie #36 the picture was taken last may during the Cannes Film Festival

  38. Cheyenne says:

    Poor Olivia, I wondered when you’d drag your tired self over here. Angelina was nominated for an Oscar for Changeling. She won an Oscar for Girl Interrupted. She was nominated for a GG award for Tourist. She was nominated for a GG and an SAG award for A Mighty Heart. She won a GG and an SAG for Gia. And you’re saying she can’t get dramatic roles? Go stick pins in your Angelina Jolie sock puppet and leave this thread to the adults. Shoo.

  39. yep says:

    Ive always wanted her to have an agent and a publicist. With brad Pitt being oh so protected by his super agent and his pr team it’s only fair.

  40. pamela says:

    If Angie’s movie gets good reviews, (and so far so good) does decent BO and better yet gets nominated, expect to see the hens heads exploding. LOL. Just the image gives me the giggles. Anyone who claims Angie can’t get work is just being delusional. And just for the record, Eric Roth was just hired to write the screenplay for Cleopatra, Fincher is still on board, and Angie’s name is still prominently attached. I think the author of the book will have a heart attack if Angie does not play Cleopatra. She is the only actress she wants for the role. It’s all up to The Jolie at this point.

  41. Canuck says:

    @Cheyenne: Bwahahahaha! I think you’re very poorly placed to be lecturing anyone about “hatefests”, hehehe…. That’s really funny!

    I guess she can tell that her days of an action star are over by the lack of scripts, when did she film last, a year and a half ago? When is her next one filming? What, no date? And now, she’s bringing out her directorial debut in a foreign language with subtitles? For a film about war, violence and rape which comes out the day before Xmas? Can you say “bomb of epic proportions, kiss your hopes of a directorial career goodbye”?

    No wonder she signed an agent. At least she’s not in denial about the state of her career, unlike you.

  42. olivia says:

    How do you say flop in BHS or Serbian/Croatin?? Cause in any language that is exactly what it is going to be……..a flop.

  43. Canuck says:

    @dede 35: Well, you’d think they would list it on the IMDB page, which it’s not. US and Turkey, only.

    @pamela 40: I personally am kind of looking forward to seeing it lose to a B &W silent film from France that has about one line of dialogue in it. Boy, Loon heads will sure explode then, eh? Lol

  44. tapioca says:

    “She was nominated for a GG award for Tourist.”

    A decision which you might remember as being near-universally acknowledged as EXACTLY why the GGs are now considered to be a big, steaming pile of you-get-the-drift…

  45. Cheyenne says:

    @pamela: Last I heard, Jolie wasn’t interested in Cleopatra. She was offered the lead in Atlas Shrugged and wasn’t interested in that either. Personally, don’t think either film will ever get made (or re-made).
    _______________________________________________

    @Canuck: So tell us, when is Goree Girls coming out? What, no release date? Oh, wait a sec: no script either. No cast. No producer. That POS has been sitting on the storyboards for three years already and can’t get funded. Gee, I wonder why?

    Here’s a clue for ya: Angie can get her own films made. Whether or not this movie succeeds, she’s proven she can produce an independent movie. Brad can, and does, produce his own films. Aniston can’t produce anything but a steaming turd. Goree is still on the storyboards because she can’t find a studio to greenlight it and she’s too chicken to do it alone. After Management dropped a 100-megaton bomb, she’s been relegated to superannuated sit-com hagdom. Maybe she can get a few bit parts in the future playing somebody’s mother.

  46. Gelina Whiddon says:

    Congratulations! Always wishing her the best.

  47. yep says:

    Angelina has decided to release it a foreign language.. err, that tells me she’s more worried about the authenticity of her movie over box office success. If she was looking for her directorial debut to be a box office smash she would have made an easy romantic comedy. Either way I like how gutsy she is for making the movie in the first place.

  48. Lisa says:

    Canuck…

    YOU ARE CRACKING ME UP!!!

    I am on no one’s tip…I love cinema too much to get all caught up in actors/actress personal lives (with a few exceptions…Angie is NOT one of them)…that being said, Angie has always had control of her career…and B.B. (before Brad)…she did play a more variety of roles…that is a fact…

    I’m glad that she has decided to let “fresh” eyes in to help her expand her horizons…everyone only has a finite amount of time where they can make the optimal amount of money and lay down the type of good will that will ensure the type of longevity that would make Betty White jealous! I am sure she’s looking at Streep’s career as a map…which is smart!

  49. SkyNet says:

    She has 6 kids give her a break. She needs some help. I think this is a good move for her. I like how she can balance huge budget films and indie ones. She really is a good actress, in spite of what people think about her.

  50. mln76 says:

    I can’t wait for Canuck’s dissertation on how ‘trampie’ is actually a legal term used in a small county in southwest Peru and a synonym for female director and how dare we ignorant Americans get offended.

  51. angelus says:

    It’s amazing — never fails. The phantom triangle is invoked when there’s no apparent need or want for it. The same two posters are hatefully attacked for no good reason, except to make others uncomfortable perhaps.

    Gosling makes interesting choices, whether they be his or his agents. Not a bad move Jolie.

  52. Day says:

    I don’t think having a team takes away from anyone’s appeal. It is automatically assumed that every celebrity has a team. Up until today, I thought she did. I like her the same–still.

  53. Cheyenne says:

    @mln #50: Oh gawd, don’t wake it up….

  54. jc126 says:

    Good. Those action roles she takes don’t let her show her range.

  55. dede says:

    whos excited to see Canuck and Oliva go cray cray when those great reviews for AJs movie start rolling in..some have already been leaked and they have been positive

  56. Canuck says:

    @Cheyenne: what does Aniston’s movies or lack thereof have to do with Jolie’s? Are they connected? Is that supposed to be an answer to Jolie not having any roles for the past year and a half and nothing in the forseeable future?

    It’s very entertaining to watch the mental gymnastics that you are doing to avoid the fact that if Jolie was getting good roles, indy or not, she wouldn’t have had to hire an agent to “find them” for her. On one hand, she is, according to you guys, able to greenlight anything. Yet no one sends her interesting indy scripts in the hopes of just that? Double Salchow 10/10!

  57. pamela says:

    And again Canuck, you have just proved how daft you are. If Angie’s movie is nominated and loses, as a first time director the nomination would be impressive, so Angie’s fans would have ABSOLUTELY nothing to be upset about. Certainly even you can understand that? There are first time directors who will give their first born for a nomination their first time out.

  58. Canuck says:

    Oh mln, don’t be silly. Trampie quite obviously means “sl*t” in this case. Because no one would EVER compare her to Charlie Chaplin…

  59. Jenny says:

    @Cheyenne @mln76 @Canuck @olivia
    We all get it. You are in love with either Angie or Jen.

    Twihards are bad but you ladies are worse, especially since you lot are older and meant to be more mature.
    How about you quit with the bullying and personal attacks and act your age.

  60. ladybert62 says:

    Hey mIn76 @50 – I am the one that calls her trampie not canuck! ha ha

    And I dont care what it means in another country as it is my very own personal name of choice for her!

  61. Marni says:

    @Canuck
    ‘On one hand, she is, according to you guys, able to greenlight anything. Yet no one sends her interesting indy scripts in the hopes of just that? Double Salchow 10/10!’

    Just like Angie herself maybe Cheyenne and some others here like it both ways.
    (I know I do, more choice!)

  62. Lithe says:

    Hey Kaiser, you realize that by merely posting these stories, you’re just poking crazy with a stick, right? Or is that the whole point? 🙂

  63. katyalia says:

    I can see Indy producers shying away from the apparent circus that seems to surround the Jolie Pitts.
    Even if she never brought her kids to the set, the security & living quarters she’s said to demand must be a big red flag.

    And I agree that it’s hard to picture her as everyday woman in a supporting role. Sure, they can de-beautify her like in ‘Good Shepard’, but then she’s no draw anymore.

  64. Miss Magpie says:

    Canuck, a little tip about how Hollywood works: Angelina pays her agent ON THE BACKEND. They get their 10% when she gets paid. She pays nothing up front.

    And I agree with many of you, but SEF and Taylor nailed it, she is one busy Mama and she needs help! (I actually think it is a sign of maturity.)

    Now, what does this mean in correlation to Brad’s ” retirement” announcement?

  65. MellaYella says:

    She is beautiful. She gain about ten lbs she would be back on top

  66. Malificent and Cleopatra…Yah,I am sooo there!!

  67. danielle says:

    It’s been a LOOONG time since Jolie’s done a really quality film. I had fun with Mr. and Mrs. Smith and even Wanted, but those aren’t high art. I think in Mighty Heart and Changeling she was miscast, and those films were dreary Oscar bait. I think it’s a VERY good idea to go to edgier independent films.

  68. taksi says:

    I always thought the problem was her own disinterest in acting in light of her family and humanitarian efforts, as well as her public persona overwhelming her believability in a role.

    It’s a smart move, she is a talented actress but her credibility as such has been shaky- not due to lack of skill but her own varying interests and predilection for attention. With Pitt having a good chance at an Oscar nomination this year, image-wise I think she’d want to be more equitable with him career-wise; they are supposed to be equals and partners. And, maybe she’s getting a little stir-crazy professionally.

  69. Cheyenne says:

    Pull your feet out of your mouth, Canuck. Angie doesn’t sit around waiting for anyone to hand her a script to direct. She wrote her own script. And casted it. And directed it. And got the film made and into the theaters. She’s not afraid to stand or fall on that, unlike some chicken-ass sitcom actress sitting on some rotten egg of a project for three years waiting for it to hatch.

    Angie has done two films in the last three years, Salt and Wanted. She doesn’t need to scamper all over Hollywood desperately chasing after roles. She does what she wants when she wants to.

    Let me know if Goree Girls gets off the storyboard before everyone currently connected to it is dead of old age.

  70. pwal says:

    52. Day
    Day:
    November 16th, 2011 at 11:45 am

    I don’t think having a team takes away from anyone’s appeal. It is automatically assumed that every celebrity has a team. Up until today, I thought she did. I like her the same–still.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    In all honesty, I see this as an exclamation point to some in HW. For years, I’ve heard some of the makers of Wanted wanting Angelina to come on board for the Wanted sequel and her constantly saying no to it, which is an excellent stance, since the way the original ended should remain intact(personally, it was one of the best, bad-@$$ movie twists I’ve seen in a minute).

    Obviously, Angelina’s stance regarding the Wanted sequel should illustrate that she’s not necessarily interested in an easy paycheck. And yes, I realize that she’s attached to Salt, but her involvement with Salt doesn’t destroy any storyline integrity. But given that this woman is interested in storytelling, both in front and behind the camera, I can’t understand why some would take her decision as a sign of weakness.

  71. Hmmm says:

    Wowza! Someone’s been eating waaay too much fruitcake!

    I’m indifferent to Ange. But I will miss her in action roles. She was amazing. As a regular person in an indie role…she is not relatable. Let’s face it- her looks are slightly plastic and alien.

  72. Canuck says:

    @Miss Magpie 64: Then her explanation makes even less sense. She’s hardly likely to give 10-20% of her earnings just to get someone to read through scripts that she’s already getting but is too “busy” to read. She’d hire a decent secretary with a degree in Literature or similar. Because even say she did an indy and accepted a salary of $1 million, do you really think she’s going to fork over $100 – $200,000 for someone to read a script that she already has in her hands? No way.

    Anyways, we’ll see just how “Indy” the first film they secure for her is. I’ll bet it’s not.

  73. Canuck says:

    @Cheyenne: Glasses dear, glasses… I don’t recall saying anything about her waiting around for scripts to direct, are you making stuff up again just so you’ll have something to say?

    So, as you keep bringing up Goree Girls, you aren’t expecting Jolie to work until that gets made, is that it? Because otherwise, I really don’t see the connection… just the deflection.

    Of course, Jolie won’t get any of her production projects off the ground, because she never had the foresight to set up a production company, unlike almost anyone with a brain and a long term plan in HW. So now, instead of using her so-called clout to get her own projects off the ground, she’s reduced to trying to find parts in projects other people are developing. Maybe she should ask Aniston for a job. Or Brad, who doesn’t seem that eager to cast her in any of his productions either.

  74. lu says:

    @jenny you are right this people are at a twihard level, maybe even a justin beiber fan level. so sad coming from grown women.

  75. lucy2 says:

    Wow, little story got people on both sides all in a tizzy!

    I don’t care for her as a dramatic actress, but I think it makes sense for any actor to diversify.

  76. Cerulean says:

    I think it’s smart. An intelligent person knows when to ask for help. By announcing this I’m sure the indie scripts will start being funneled her way. She is a good get for an indie. Plus she can stretch herself and be less beholden to big box. I’ve been wanting her to change it up.

    Some people troll the Jolie posts. I wonder if it’s Chelsea Handler? Is that you Chels? Never see them post elsewhere.

  77. Cheyenne says:

    Canuck: “Jolie won’t get any of her production projects off the ground”

    ***************************************

    Have you completely lost it? Her film which has been her project from day one is being released next month.

  78. minnie says:

    I hav the feeling that this hiring an agent could go beyond her work as an actress… why not think she’s thinking of getting scripts in which she could act, mainly, but alsoprobably produce (her or Brad) or alo direct? Why not?
    With 6 growing children she needs to delegate work
    And please answer me a question… does not Meryl streep have an agent? she does? why? is she not getting scripts? or maybe she has been a busy mom all this time who needs a little help with her career while she is endingto her family?
    Actually Meryl’s agent is no other than the brother of Stephen huvane, J aniston’s alter ego… how different a career! one managing a great acreses projects, and theother calling the papz and planting stories to the tabloids, oops andd staging charities in Mexican resorts.

  79. Mia says:

    Wooowzaaaa that first picture. That face. Jebuz. Gooorrgeous. <3

  80. Camille says:

    @Cerulean 76#: Excellent post, I agree with everything you said.
    I think this is a *very* smart move. At least AJ won’t be stuck playing the same characters forever like a certain other actress that people like to compare AJ to *eye roll* .

    And yes the Trolls can’t help themselves when it comes to Brangelina can they lol.

  81. Juilia says:

    Of course, Jolie won’t get any of her production projects off the ground, because she never had the foresight to set up a production company,
    ——————————-
    What are you talking about ?

    ITLOBAH, the movie set to open on december the 23th is not only written and directed by her but also co produced by her along with executive producer Graham King and co producer Tim Headington.

    Newsfalsh : You don’t need to set up a production company to co produce. DiCaprio often co produce many projects. He doesn’t have a production company. Johnny depp is co producer of the Rum Diary, he doesn’t have a production company.

    So what you blatantly say as being true is NOT what is happening NOW in the present reality.

  82. Cerulean says:

    @Cammile: I look forward to her new direction. She’s got loads of charisma and I just think she’d be great in a good quality interesting indie. May her best work come!

    Love your kitty avatar. I have blue eyed pointed cat and a blue eyed white one. Spoiled lil things.

  83. Kara Ann says:

    Smart move to get an agent to sort thru scripts and, also, smart to move into the indie film area. I believe Jolie does have screen presence and is a money maker but I, also, feel like her career hasn’t been as stellar as originally expected from her. “Girl Interupted” and “Gia” are, to me, her best projects to date and they are far in the past for her. Maybe Jolie took the fun and easier projects like “Salt” and “Wanted” because she was concentrating more on her humanitarian and family life. There is nothing wrong with that and is even commendable. Still, if she has decided to return to more dramatic acting roles, I would be interested in seeing if she realizes her original potential. Meryl Streep like potential, which, no matter if you like or not, it seems pretty obvious that she hasn’t reached those acting heights.

  84. Canuck says:

    @Cheyenne: oh please, I’m all aquiver in anticipation over you telling me the name of her production company… The one she doesn’t have with the optioned properties that she doesn’t have either.

    And seriously, do you not realize that she, and almost certainly Depp negotiated with GK to receive part or all of their payment for TT in film and distribution support for future projects? Do you really think it’s any coincidence that GK is heavily involved with Jolie’s film and Depp’s Rum Diaries? Both of these are vanity projects, neither will do particularly well. Depp is honouring a promise he made to his friend, Jolie is trying to transition. Duh!

  85. Bean says:

    Wow
    First Pitt “doesn’t have the respect of no one(!!!) in hollywood”, and now Jolie “can’t get any work”!!!
    It’s funny(sad?),though,the same people that go on and on about the latter,throw a shit-fest when she does work.
    It’s all,’she’s neglecting her children/has all the money in the world to quit’ when Jolie is working.
    But all,’she isn’t getting offers/doesn’t have money’ when she is not working
    Nothing new…but damn,so sexist & crazy!

    I agree that this is a very smart move and it will be great seeing her in more movies were she shows just how good of an actress she really is.
    Looking forward to her directorial debut.

  86. G says:

    Apparently some people hate everything that the Jolie/Pitts do.

    What is really bizarre is how they also seem to hate everything they don’t do and everything they can imagine them doing or not doing. It’s like they’ve made two actors the organizing principle of their universe?

  87. Rita says:

    I think she took too long to do it. She is always traveling, have children, humanitarian work … she spends most time out of Hollywood, she ends up not having much contact with directors, producers … etc. At this point Brad Pitt did well to keep in the CAA, which represents actors as well because they represent movies, writers, producers …. it is easier to work. And unlike Brad Pitt seems to be a guy who always keeps a social with these guys, Angelina has never seemed very open, it is a little apart from other actors, directors and producers think this makes it difficult for her too. I see so much cool director speaking openly in the media would like to work with her like Darren Aronofsky, David O. Russell, Ridley Scott … etc … Sometimes I wonder if it comes to her …

  88. NM9005 says:

    Very smart move. It doesn’t matter if she gets help from an agency or does it on her own, she is a businesswomen and must make choices that benefit her and her career. Like you said Kaiser, if she has intelligence and talent than that intelligence drove her to make this decision. Whether it’s a good or bad one doesn’t matter, the fact is that she is a woman that lives by her own rules and principles and no one will tell her what’s right or wrong. She can do that by herself. Plus, if it doesn’t suit her than she can fire them no? So I don’t see the issue here for branching out and seeking interesting parts.

    Acting is a fucking marathon, you have to have new projects and stay relevant. She’s too young to quit the business and I don’t see her playing the same part over and over again.

  89. Kelly says:

    She’s a wonderful actress and she is so not Hollywood glam; she is beautiful without tons of makeup and “stylists”

  90. Gal says:

    She puts butts in seats? When? Not many people saw The Changling, The Mighty Heart, Alexander or Beyond Borders. Yes, to some she might be beautiful, but I personally don’t think she’s that great of an actress. Yes, she was good in Gia and Girl Interrupted. Those movies are OLD. She will need to rely on her acting, not her “beauty” to getting roles and after proving herself by becoming a better actor.

  91. Camille says:

    @Cerulean: ITA with you. AJ has charisma in spades and she shines in the right role. It would be great to see her stretch herself acting wise again.

    About my av- it is a Birman and it looks a lot like my baby girl, who turned one last month. She is very spoilt too hehe :).

  92. Julez says:

    The way I read that release, she hired the agency ONLY to represent her as a writer and director… not as an actor. (And she’s sticking with her longtime manager re: acting roles.)

  93. Cheyenne says:

    Canuck:

    Wow. Just… wow!!

    I hope you find some comfort in your delusions. I had no idea it was that bad.

    Peace.

  94. Cheyenne says:

    @ Gal: $5 billion in total box office returns is a lot of butts in a lot of seats.

  95. Freya says:

    @10

    You looove talking about Jolie, don’t you, Canuck.
    You don’t like her, to put it mildly, but every time there’s a story about her, here you are!

  96. Canuck says:

    @Julez: I think she hired a different agency for the writing and directing several months ago.

  97. Canuck says:

    @Cheyenne: Okayyyyyyyy. Still waiting for the name of her production company and the properties she’s optioned through it.

    As for GK, it’s blatantly obvious. Just because it never occured to you, doesn’t make it any less so.

    @Julia 81: Depp’s production company is called Infinitum Nihil. Dicaprio’s is called Appian Way Productions.

  98. Juilia says:

    @ Canuck

    Fair enough. It still doesn’t make your assumption as of Jolie not being able to get her production projects of the ground because she doesn’t have a production company, true.

    ITLOBAH contradicts your all premise and show that she just did it without having a production company.

    Wether she will be able to do it again for future projects, nobody knows but that doesn’t erase the simple fact that she just did it.

  99. sandy#1 says:

    i also agree this is a very smart move on her part, it can be time consuming, hunting down parts, reading scripts,etc, we all know how busy jolie is, i am just happy she is still interested in acting, great for every one around.

  100. Heine says:

    Eh, it’s a good thing she hired someone to help her transition because she just doesn’t read ‘indie’ actress. Actors who do well in indie pictures are typically character and theater actors. In this case, her ‘lead actress/movie star’ good looks work against her.

    She can’t go the Meryl Streep route because while Meryl did lots of heavy drama, she easily transitions into comedy which for Jolie equals a massive fail. Plus Meryl has always been relatable in terms of looks and she can act circles around just about anyone else.

    She isn’t as good an actress as Tilda Swinton (We Need To Talk About Kevin) or Kate Winslet (The Reader/Mildred Pierce/Revolutionary Road) or Cate Blanchett (Elizabeth/Babel/I’m Not There)who is older than her but gets better parts in better movies. And as stoic and humorless and those three seem (except Kate Winslet maybe) all have done comedy or satire.

    Smart that she’s getting started now rather than later-those women and plenty of younger actresses have already been upping their pedigree and getting to be known for their great talent and not their looks.

    EDIT: -Why doesn’t Jolie do a comedy or even just a satirical film? Brad does them. All of the really great actors I can think of have done them. Was she that traumatized from the failure of Life Or Something Like It?

  101. Daphne says:

    I thought she is retiring into her charity and family….in 3 years?

  102. Cheyenne says:

    @ Juilia: Don’t mind Canuck. She invents her own facts to fit her own theories.

    @ Heine: I don’t see her in a major comedy role but she and Brad had some pretty good comedic moments in Mr and Mrs Smith.

  103. The H says:

    Wow Canuck hurt a lot of ppls feelings. 🙁

  104. zara says:

    I for one am excited at this news. I have been wanting her to go the indie route for the last year or so. Angie has always had the potential to turn in great work and I pray she can deliver. In her younger days, she always was singled out by reviewers even when the movies she appeared in were mediocre.

    The late Pauline Kael said the following of Jolie’s performance in Gia, “My God,” she exclaimed, “this girl could play both the Brando and Maria Schneider roles in ‘Last Tango’! Where in the world did she come from?”
    http://www.salon.com/2005/06/11/angelina_jolie/

    I am also hoping this signals an awakening in Angie and a resolve to break out of the Brangelina box that fans and critics want to put her in. Hopefully she is also working on regaining her health as well. I am looking forward to this new chapter in her life.

  105. CHRISTIAN_GIRL says:

    She said she was taking time off and she did. Then people are trying to say she can’t get work? Unbelievable.

    Brad also took time off. It is what they wanted and said they would do. Helped with the twins growing up and out of the way to better concentrate. Babies require different work than toddlers. Now it’s on to business. First with BP and her to follow. Well played. HW took notice and accepted their work with applause.

    She will keep the agency as long as it works for her. It is no coincidence she signed on right before the promo for ITLOBAH. Angie is smart for sure. She will learn what she needs and that’s that.

    Her big budget movies will continue and her serious drama will mix in nicely. This woman has a plan and unfortunately, we are NOT privy to it. The spin some are trying to push is BS. With all things JP you will have to wait. Guaranteed, she is in the drivers seat and NO one is in her lane. Brad has a plan too. I can wait. No one knew about ITLOBAH until she wanted it out there, only to shock everyone. It seems to be getting great comments from viewers which again cements her worth and power in her biz.

    I think Brad has her in Plan B from years ago as a Producer. I am probably not wrong as I remember reading it. She is not concerned about others career, but protecting hers and her families future. She has grown to now need agencies to work on all fronts of her career paths (acting, writing & directing). That is awesome and reflects well on this 1 woman. No one is seriously mocking her that really matters. HW is too in awe.

    No studio would turn her down. Why? Because Brad got a divorce? Silly, but if they want her for a part and she agrees it is done. Don’t act like she is the last person in Hollywood that they will look to cast. Serious, that is beyond nuts. She did not just appear in HW and never made a name for herself and her work ethic. All crews working with her nothing but positive things to say about her.

    Angie is ON to something and not as some think scared of something. She will drop it on us when she is ready, until then her white hot career stays intact. Don’t be fooled to think otherwise. Brad and her are smirking and plotting and I can’t wait for the reveal. Anybody thinking failure is going to be devastated. There, I said it. Now wait for it.

  106. Freya says:

    I think that’s smart! She pays other people to read scripts. This gives her more time to do other things.
    She has told them what she wants so they won’t bother her with scripts they know she wouldn’t be interested in.

  107. NM9005 says:

    @zara: I read the article.
    But before I did, I looked up who Kael was and her introduction on Wiki read:

    “Kael was known for her “witty, biting, highly opinionated, and sharply focused” reviews, her opinions often contrary to those of her contemporaries.”

    That’s one.

    She disliked classics like “West Side Story”

    That’s two (personal but still two).

    Says that “she could scare the crap out of Jack Nicholson in Cuckoo’s nest”

    That’s three (Lisa Rowe was the female version of McMurphy, in fact that whole film was a bad female replica of Cuckoo’s nest and falls flat in comparison! And also four because McMurphy is much scarier than Rowe because he isn’t ill, he’s pretending to be ill and destroys their system from inside out. So sane Jack plays an sane guy who is insane while Jolie played an insane girl who is naturally insane WHILE she (Jolie) was insane too in real life. Jack was so multi-dimensional in that film, I was so in love with that film and its plot. In comparison Rowe does nothing to turn the system upside down and serves only for the entertainment shock value person of the film. Personally, Murphy and Moss deserved much more credit for their intense and truly disturbed characters. They had more depth than Ryder and Jolie together. No comparison Kael! And yes, I read Kaysen’s book too after I saw the film, it wasn’t good.

    The article states she isn’t popular (yes, in magazines, sites etc…) so basically the article speaks against what you’re trying to say zara. Did you read the entire piece anyway? They even say one of the best scenes of MAMS is when she jumps of the building half nekkid (it is pretty awesome but not in the context they try to conjure)! And I liked that film.

    So five.

    Ok, bear with me on this one: they are praising the abomination that is…SHARK TALE and in the same breath are saying it’s her only part as an femme fatale!?!? They are praising her accent in Alexander (Jolie isn’t good with the accents). Are they fucking kidding me? This article is so bad =D.

    Six, seven and eight.

    They are saying she lacks box office success. Again, going against your point zara.

    The funniest one? When they claim that she never played a role that is defined by male concepts or traditonal female sexuality. No, that would be Ellen Ripley or Sarah Connor to take an example from for instance but if you show your boobs in six movies (the ones that I know of) then you pretty much ruined that.
    If guys go “owww, Foxy” when she appaered in Wanted (actually happended =))then no, sorry. Ruined.

    So nine. Actually ten.

    And to end (there are more though):
    Original Sin is worth watching. Uhmn. No. For many many reasons.

    They should’ve focused on her films which are actually good and memorable because she is actually a fine actress. They higlighted a lot of bad film choices she made. I would fire that Allen Barra guy! Even I would objectively write a much better article. And if he couldn’t help himself to kiss Jolie’s ass, then he could’ve done a better job than that piece of crap.

    Thanks for sharing though (honestly =)), I love reading these kinds of articles but really you picked the worst one. Sorry for the rant…

  108. Mira says:

    The Oscar-winning director for “No Man’s Land,” said in an interview is a translation of google … very nice what he said about Angelina Jolie

    Exaggerated
    We touched on the directorial debut of Angelina Jolie who has raised a lot of dust in a country where Tanovićevoj in 2002. brought an Oscar with “No Man’s Land”. “I think all of this overblown,” she says, commenting on withdrawal (and recovery) permits for filming in BiH. “I understand and Grabovca that triggered the ban, not everyone would say that is crazy! I do not understand why the ban, we do not need such censorship, you can disagree with something or not, but why ban? After all, nobody had read the script, I did not see anything controversial or problematic in that story. ”
    I do not want to be bullied

    Danis has a very positive opinion about Angelina Jolie: “She is not only a Hollywood star, I think she really understands the problems of today’s world, after all, a film that is now working very hard, it’s a very dramatic story.”

    Kolar and Tanovic already working on the next project which are held in strict confidence. “We can not tell you what it is. See how Angelina harass, and just because we do not want anything more to announce that we are not problems in the bay, although the film has nothing to do with our region. But it will be a little bombastic, we will tell you in January … ”
    http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jutarnji.hr%2Fdanis-tanovic–angelina-nije-samo-zvijezda–ona-zaista-razumije-svijet%2F896719%2F

  109. Mira says:

    Churchill and Roosevelt with Anthony Hopkins, anyone know what stage is this project? And Angelina is really only going to produce?

  110. Emma says:

    @Shaykay, #14 … “I haven’t seen The Changling or A Mighty Heart but those were not ordinary situations either.”

    Why wasn’t she an ordinary character in “The Changling?” Perhaps you should watch it first before lumping it with “A Mighty Heart.” She did some wonderful work in it.

  111. Star says:

    Gal, Heine and Canuck bring up some good points.
    Geez cant people have opinions that differ from all the bobble heads on this blog without getting attacked?

  112. Pat says:

    I am surprised by this. Who really knows why she did it. But as you said aging in hollywod is a huge problem, especially if you have been known as a sex symbol. Movies like Salt are great but with a 45 – 50 year old not so much. Angie is smart to realize this. Hope it works out for her.

  113. Moo Cow says:

    Uh … you ar ewrong. Ang still doesn’t need anyone to get her the big roles. SHe can do that on her own but she needs someone to read scripts for her in the other area of indie and small drama roles. Managers don’t do that but Geyer was more involved in that than most. I personally think AJ’s Mom used to do it for her as AJ has said she hates to do it. Geyer is a manager but he is also a producer and used to be an agent so he may want to reduce his involvement to a certain degree. He also signed Nicole Kidman a bit over a year ago and he still manages Billy Bob Thornton and others.

    Also … IFA is only for indies etc. sothat nmmenas they won’t get a slice of her lareger project salaries.

  114. pamela says:

    @73

    LOL, you are hilariously desperate and delusional. I am beginning to think you are a member of the Goddess Circle. Is that you Kathy Najimy?

  115. Freya says:

    @86

    “Apparently some people hate everything that the Jolie/Pitts do.

    What is really bizarre is how they also seem to hate everything they don’t do and everything they can imagine them doing or not doing.
    It’s like they’ve made two actors the organizing principle of their universe.”

    Love this post!
    Let me add that, on top of that, these obsessed people want to tell Jolie and Pitt how to live their lives, raise their children, and so on.

    Jolie and Pitt own these people!

  116. pamela says:

    BTW, it seems Angie is still attached to Cleopatra, and things are beginning to perk with that project.

    http://screenrant.com/angelina-jolie-cleopatra-david-fincher-sandy-140100/

    Poor Angie, I wonder if she knows that Canuck said she can’t get any work, and that she will not get work because she wasn’t smart enough to have her own production company? LOL

    Angie did say her next project would be Malficient, so I believe Cleopatra might still be a way off.

  117. Kara Ann says:

    #110 Emma:

    I’m responding to you even though I didn’t make the comment your were questioning:
    “Why wasn’t she an ordinary character in “The Changling?” Perhaps you should watch it first before lumping it with “A Mighty Heart.” She did some wonderful work in it.”
    IMO, Jolie’s fact-based character in “the Changeling” was in an extraordinary situation. She wasn’t dealing with everyday life and relationships. Having your son abducted isn’t “usual”, thank God. I think the poster was trying to say that it would interesting to see how Jolie fairs in a relationship-driven, character-driven film. I would like to see that as well. Something along the lines of Melissa Leo in The Fighter or Kate Winslet in Revolutionary Road. Normal people in normal situations. I saw “changeling” and I didn’t find Jolie particularly memorable but that may be because all I could concentrate on was the haunting image of what happened to those children and, presumably, the main character’s child as well. If anyone asked me whether or not to watch that movie, I don’t think I’d recommend it unless you are an avid Jolie fan.

    It seems to me that Jolie has segued from “actress” into “movie star’. Alot of that is thanks to the tabloids over which she has no control and, some of it, thanks to the film choices she has made i.e. “gun-toting” hit woman/action woman of some kind. For Pitt, it seems he has done the opposite. Pitt has gone from “movie star” to “actor”. As both of them age, it’ll be interesting to watch their growth on screen.

  118. pamela says:

    @117

    I would love to see Angie do something like the Melissa Leo’s role. I did not like Revolutionary Road. I will be happy if she doesn’t do anymore action films…I worry about her doing those stunts. She may do Salt 2, but I don’t think it will be as action packed as the first one. I believe she is also still somewhat attached to the Scarpetta (sp) project.

  119. dj says:

    @SEF. I thought the same thing. She is part of a partnered pair that has 6 kids. Who wouldn’t need some more help? Maybe she wants to spend more time with her family?

  120. TabbyCat says:

    ladybert62, I notice you don’t call Aniston trampie. Why is that? After all, Angelina is monogamous and doesn’t sleep around, Aniston has been with 3 quarters of Hollywood. Apply the term to the correct person please.

  121. Canuck says:

    @Star 111: No, it seems there are certain of the posters that absolutely have to believe that black is white when it comes to Jolie.

    She signs on with the talent agency of one of the hottest rising actors “because she wants to find small indy films to do”. Yet it’s not because she now needs an agent (which SHE obviously thinks she does, hence the signing on), it’s because she just can’t read all of those fabulous scripts sitting on her desk. In addition, they also seem to think she’s either stupid or careless with money, because she’s going to fork over 10-20% of her salary for a glorified secretary, rather than just hiring one dedicated solely to her for a couple of grand a month. And this seems to make some sort of sense to them.

    What I don’t get is why she doesn’t start eating properly, hit the gym to build up some muscle tone and curves again, and extend her sell-by date that way?

  122. TabbyCat says:

    Canuck, wtf? Why would Angelina hire some office secretary or someone in literature – both of which would have NO IDEA about good scripts and acting? Only agents have that experience, not some garden variety common secretary or some uni lecturer. What would a secretary or a person who has a degree in literature know about what would be a good movie? Scripts is acting scouts and agents area. Its not an area for secretaries or librarians or
    whatever. You need someone with experience in the acting film to read scripts.

  123. osarieme says:

    This woman is way too skinny. Not a good sight. Eat a burger or two.

  124. Sara says:

    I hope she never does any movie like ‘A Mighty Heart’. I hated that movie. It was so sad and depressing. My BF and I love Angie and when we saw it we both cried and we’re not super emotional people who cry at movies. Ugh. The Changeling was pretty sad too.

  125. Canuck says:

    @Tabby Cat: Seriously? A good story is a good story. A good story with a badly written script can be rewritten. A bad story with a well written script is still a bad story. It doesn’t take an agent to recognize what is good, how do you suppose books make it onto the best seller list? Because they appeal to something in a wide range of people. It’s not rocket science.

    Next you’ll be telling me that one needs to be an artist to enjoy a painiting, a sommelier to enjoy a glass of Margaux, and Olympic swimmer to enjoy a pool.

  126. Derpy says:

    @ #107 NM9005, in reference to http://www.salon.com/2005/06/11/angelina_jolie/

    I’m only going so far as to critique very few things, as I lack the patience to go far and beyond in fact checking for you. I would like to point out, that in your post you have referenced a good bit of work Angelina Jolie did AFTER this article was published. As you can see in the URL alone, 2005/06/11. Near the headline of the article: SATURDAY, JUN 11, 2005 4:56 PM CENTRAL STANDARD TIME. Which should be noted as this article was published just -four- days after the US MAMS premiere.

    So, using the first google link I found about BO numbers, because I’m lazy, I’m just going off the first list, because it’s ordered by date unlike latter lists: http://boxofficemojo.com/people/chart/?id=angelinajolie.htm

    I did a bit of math..The first movie listed there, which is not grey, is Hackers, which came out in 1995. K so 1995-2005, that’s 10 years. Movies not included in the total: Sky Captain, Shark Tale.

    Moving on, as stated above, the article came out on June 11, with MAMS released just days before that (site and IMDB differ by 3 days). So the author of the article had no clue as to how much this movie would pull in (this is part of your whole “box office success” thing). Today is November 17th, 2011. So we’re 6 years and 5 months out from the date the article was posted. Not included in the numbers below that are on the list are the KFP movies.

    1995-2005 (17 movies) – $520,756,027
    2005-2011 (8 movies) – $685,678,249

    So not only have her movies grossed more in theaters in the past 6 years than the 10 previous, she did HALF the amount of movies in that time peroid… and if any of the gabbermouths on here are to be believed that her work is dried up, then there won’t be many more coming out in the next 3 years and 4 months, eh?

    One thing you can see from the numbers is that she has box office draw, and has steadily become more and more famous. Whether you like her or not, the numbers she’s produced, can’t really be ignored. I’d like to even venture a guess that most of you can admit that since the article was published, she has been a larger draw, bigger star, and great success in her own right.

    And yes, I know I didn’t use the adjusted for inflation numbers, far too lazy. If one of you want to go through that list and post the numbers to try to disprove something about how much her star has risen, no one’s stopping you, enjoy.

    So last but not least, if all else fails, at least learn to check the articles published date before going on a rant about how someone isn’t hot shit because their more recent movies aren’t there… one would think that would have sent a bell or two off in the first place.

  127. Sakyiwaa says:

    okay, whoa, so many opinions!

    All i’m gonna say is… if it works for her, then fine.

  128. star says:

    @ Tabbycat
    theres no need to insult Jennifer Aniston to defend Jolie. they’re two separate people and calling a woman out for dating many men is ridiculous when its considered okay for men to do it. As far as we know both women hve been monogamous so neither is a tramp although Jolie has been classless about her encounters with men announcing she had sex with billy bob in the car, getting involved with billy bob and brad pitt when they were still in relationships. i think her behavior lacks class but i dont think shes a tramp.

  129. Sally says:

    Beowulf was voice only as well.

  130. Nikki says:

    @ Sally Beowulf was motion capture like Avatar

  131. Nibbi says:

    it bugs me that you say it’s because she’s “aging” and she’s seeing the writing on the wall or whatever, blah. this is LA JOLIE first of all and like someone else said she could probably get any damn role she wants (psh, male OR female, salt was originally for tom cruise! 😉 drives me crazy how we insist on women having shelf lives that don’t go past 28. (jeez every time i comment on this thing i feel like it’s a feminist screed. guess that’s the only thing that ruffles me enough to really comment…) i think it’s clear enough in the article that lists her last big flicks: the tourist, salt, and wanted all *sucked,* tho i saw them cuz i love her ;), and maybe she’s bored with the big-tent suckflicks tho they help her make tons of cash to give away to charities. (she more or less put it that way in some interview, i think.)

  132. NM9005 says:

    @Derpy: What are you on??? No seriously.
    That was well embarassing to read. I was commenting on bad the article was considering I DO believe she is a GOOD actress and that the article did nothing but highlight her bad films. Never has I said here that she can’t act or that she isn’t popular so child please!

  133. Derpy says:

    @NM9005, You filled your post with about as much opinion and back and forth bullshittery as the author of the original outdated article did, even referencing some of her works that weren’t even out yet. Basically, my original intent of the post was to have you look at the dates of things before spouting off and making yourself look silly. The meat of the post came just because I felt like playing with numbers.

    I’d keep typing and we could go on a merry-go-round of opinions, as I critique your opinions based on the original articles authors opinions, etc. But I’m more open to accepting others may think differently than I do about certain roles she has played. Again, just learn to check dates, it’s a giant pet peeve of mine, giant. You can go back to the Aniston thread where she took those pics that everyone around here loves to throw conspiracy theories at, I went in and got the exif data off the pics and posted screenshots (which were ignored for more conspiracies *shrug*).

    Also, being quite derpy right now, haven’t been sleeping well. :3

  134. NM9005 says:

    @Derpy, what has Aniston to do with that article?

    I know what I read and I commented on it.
    Nobody in his right mind would call the films they summed up worth watching. Mediocre at best but they wrote about it like it was Oscar material.
    They referenced to a few films and I commented.

    Silly is when you post not even 30min after I did and bringing Aniston in this. What are you waiting until I counter back? Well I did, so bye now. I’m too tired for this fuckery now. And nobody tells me what I should or should not do, I’m familiar with research and referencing and will listen to my teachers for advice not from some stranger on the net defending a mega film star they don’t know.

  135. Freya says:

    @127

    That’s right! AJ does what SHE wants! It’s HER career, so it’s HER decision.

  136. Camille says:

    “What I don’t get is why she doesn’t start eating properly, hit the gym to build up some muscle tone and curves again, and extend her sell-by date that way?”

    Maybe because she has more substance as a person and actress than just being known for having ‘a nice body’. A ‘nice body’ will *only* get you so far for so long in HW. Eventually everything physically goes south so having good to solid acting skills will take you further. Especially once an actress hits their 40s and beyond. I still think this is a good move for her.

    I guess the haters are going to hate no matter when AJ does. Good grief.

  137. Canuk says:

    @Camille: My point being that a) she’s an actress, b) she knows women get put on the shelf much earlier than men, c) as an actress, especially in HW, one of her “assets” is her looks, d) she doesn’t have her ducks in a row for the aftermath yet although this move is working towards that, buying herself another 5 or 10 years of “pick and choose because I’m still the go-to girl for my niche” would be nothing but an advantage to her. I don’t think she’s stupid and I don’t think she’s unaware that after a certain age in HW, if you want good roles, you’re much better off providing them for yourself than relying on someone else to do so.

    This particular reflection has nothing to do with being a “hater”, it’s a valid question to ask. Just as is wondering why she has never, over her “glory, power” years, taken the time to set up her own production company and set aside interesting projects that she is in control of for the post “action girl” days. Projects that have meaty roles for a woman that mainstream HW (the “you need to be under 30, have big boobs and furnish spank bank material or it won’t sell) wouldn’t choose to do without someone doggedly pushing it in their faces. I could understand if she was an airhead bimbo, but she’s not.

    I just find it very odd that she’s not doing what she can to give herself more time, and especially doing what she can to keep control over what she does in the future. It makes no sense to me since it’s clear from any angle that HW only worships youth when it comes to women. Then you have a 10-15 year “dry spell” (corresponding to when you start to look less “hot” and more maternal until you can pass for a non-Oedipdal complex inducing Grandmother). After that, if you’re lucky, you might win a few roles that every other once well known actress who is still in the business will also be vying for.

  138. truthSF says:

    Not to worry Canuk, Angelina understands the importance of as you say “set aside interesting projects that she is in control of for the post “action girl” days. Projects that have meaty roles for a woman that mainstream HW”.

    She has just signed on for a very meaty role that is not an “action girl” role:

    Angelina Jolie Signs on for Gertrude Bell Biopic

    Angelina Jolie is set to star in Gertrude Bell, a biopic about the English writer, archeologist, and pioneering figure in the Middle East, THR reports.

    Ridley Scott, whose worked on such flicks as Gladiator and Black Hawk Down, will develop the project with his Scott Free Productions and may also possibly direct the movie.

    Gertrude “has been described as the female Lawrence of Arabia for the impact the English woman had in the Middle East and her work in establishing what would become the modern framework for Jordan and Iraq. With a passion for archeology and languages, she wrote about her adventures in the Ottoman Empire and desert kingdoms, traveling in not only a predominantly male world but one whose culture and religion was very alien to the British Empire,” according to the mag.

    http://justjared.buzznet.com/2011/11/17/angelina-jolie-gertrude-bell-biopic/comment-page-3/#comments

    I hope this article has appeased your worries for now.

  139. Heine says:

    Truthsf: Oh Christ, she’s gonna try an English accent again?

    Why not choose a British actress who actually looks like the woman the film is about-like Helena Bohnam Carter or Kelly MacDonald? Even Kiera Knightley would have been a better casting choice, she was fantastic in Atonement.

    Boo in you, Ridley Scott.

  140. Emma says:

    @Julie, #36 … “I don’t know when that first pic was taken but God she was beautiful then.”

    Julie this photo was taken at the Cannes premiere of “Kungfu Panda 2” on May 12, 2011. Here’s a link to photos of Angie at the ‘Photo Call’ for the film.

    http://www.redcarpet-fashionawards.com/2011/05/12/angelina-jolie-in-salvatore-ferragamo-2011-cannes-film-festival-kung-fu-panda-2-photocall/
    ___________________________

    @TruthSF, #138 … “She has just signed on for a very meaty role that is not an “action girl” role:

    Angelina Jolie Signs on for Gertrude Bell Biopic

    Angelina Jolie is set to star in Gertrude Bell, a biopic about the English writer, archeologist, and pioneering figure in the Middle East, THR reports.”

    Well that explains the script Angie had in her hand the day she went solo to meet someone for lunch while Brad was still filming in London. Good for her!

  141. truthSF says:

    @Heine:

    Directors have the right to choose whatever actress they want to act in their movie. It’s the same as having an english actress being hired to do a horrible rendition of an American accent.

    Angelina seems to do very well with playing roles based on an actual person (Gia, Girl, Interupted, Changling), hopefully they’ll hire a good coach to work on her accent.

  142. Freya says:

    I’m looking forward to Jolie playing Maleficent and/or Cleopatra (another side of her), Gertrude Bell (Jolie likes ‘Lawrence of Arabia’) and Kay Scarpetta. All interesting roles!

  143. Freya says:

    @136

    Camille, there are women in Hollywood, the shallow ones, who work hard all day long, in fact it’s their main interest, to stay “eff-able.”

    Of course, things don’t have to go south early, if one makes room for exercise. I saw Raquel Welch on TV, looking fantastic.

  144. Freya says:

    @131

    “She’s aging” is a stupid comment, by people who don’t like Jolie and don’t know what else to say.
    I suppose they mean it as a put down, totally forgetting that it applies to everybody.

    Here is a question for them: Who isn’t?
    Only Benjamin Button ages backwards, and only on the screen.

  145. Freya says:

    @105

    CHRISTIAN-GIRL, this is totally possible. Brad Pitt is the producer of a movie and the director is… Angelina Jolie.

  146. Juilia says:

    @ Heine

    For a simple reality jolie detractors keep on deliberatly ignoring and dismissing : Jolie is the front woman in Hollywood right now and at the top of her game, She is a powerhouse who has clout and opens the top executives doors. Roles are done, redone, rewritten around her or not done at all and they stay dead on the drawers. Directors will publicly say they want her in their projects, will fly to her place whatever the country to offer her roles on her terms. Projects that needed financing for years suddenly get green lit and are financed as soon as she is attached to it.

    Here is a excerpt summarizing how the Hollywood game play and where Jolie’s asset stand when it comes to Hollywood not the gossip world : At the very top.

    “As for Werner Herzog’s movie about the same subject that he’s hoping to make with Naomi Watts, he better get on that. He recently told us he still needs financing to get it made, but you can bet if Jolie’s project rolls, his will be killed dead. But what if they joined forces and it became a Jolie/Herzog pairing instead? Yeah, we’d pay to see that. C’mon Hollywood, make it happen”

    http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/angelina-jolie-to-play-gertrude-bell-in-upcoming-biopic-ridley-scott-eyes-directors-chair

    Sorry for her detractors but that’s reality and they better smell the koffee cause she maybe a divisive figure in the gossip world that tend to mix it all but in hollywood she means serious business who is becoming a tripple threat talent wise while adding to her resume with professional smart moves.

  147. Canuk says:

    TruthSF: You’re missing the point. Ridley Scott is developing and producing this (Yes, he too has a Production company). Jolie didn’t “set this aside for herself”, Scott set it aside for whichever actress he decided to choose. He could have chosen her, he could have chosen Kate Winslet, he could have chosen anyone he wanted and Jolie has no control over who gets the part unless it’s herself, at which point she can say “yes” or “no”.

    And I’m not “worried”, I’m more at a loss to understand why she wouldn’t plan ahead.

  148. Mnj says:

    First she wanted to quit acting, then she wanted to be a director, and now she wants an agency to gey different roles. Wow this women sure knows how to keep herself in the news. No wonder she is so active she gets bore fast.

  149. Mnj says:

    First she wanted to quit acting, then she wanted to be a director, and now she wants an agency to gey different roles. this women sure knows how to keep herself in the news. No wonder she is so active she gets bore fast.