Royal rota reporter: We weren’t pressured to kill the photo of Princess Kate & Carole

New York Magazine recently published an interesting piece called “What It’s Like to Be a Member of the Royal Press Pack.” The person was not identified, but they’re talking about being part of the royal rota, the official “royal reporters” tasked with covering the daily activities of the Windsors and communicating with the palace comms offices. Not to be confused with a royal commentator, who could be anyone from a former butler to a well-connected columnist to a deviant with kompromat. The point of the piece seems to be that the rota didn’t know what the hell was going on with the Princess of Wales before the video announcement about her cancer. There’s also a very strange and untrue side-discussion about how the rota were totally supportive of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, pinky-swear promise. Some highlights:

Another bum year for the Windsors: Certainly it’s turning out to be another annus horribilis for the royal family. The life of a royal correspondent is structured around the official engagement. It wasn’t always the case, but as the job has changed, the official engagements are the best chance to see the working royals in action and the best chance to talk to officials, the people who work for them. Those official engagements are very choreographed, and often the story is when the choreography goes wrong or when something unexpected happens. So when they first announced on the same day that both Kate and Charles were going into hospital and both were going to need a period of recuperation, I think the feeling was, What are we going to do? There’s not going to be anything to write for a couple of months.

The American press basically pressured these dumbasses to do their jobs: The working day has partly been reacting to all the rumors. It was pressure from editors to come up with a fresh story, a fresh line, trying to weigh how seriously to take some of the stuff that you are reading from elsewhere, from abroad in particular—because don’t forget, the American press has been deeply involved in all of this. We were always in a difficult position. I just thought that being a reporter meant you just get the facts and then you tell the readers what the facts were. But on the royal beat, it’s much more than that. You have to think, Well, what are the readers going to say? The editors think, How is this going to look?

The photo of Kate in the car with her mother: We had that situation where Kate hadn’t been seen since Christmas, and then Backgrid had taken a picture of her in the car traveling with her mother. A couple of people claimed that the British papers decided not to run that picture because the palace put huge pressure on them not to do it. As far as I’m aware, that’s not the case. I think papers decided it’s probably not going to be a good look if we run those pictures. Always at the back of anybody in the media’s mind is the feeling that the readers are going to say, “They’re doing to her what they did to Diana.” The days of the British media just blindly ignoring requests from the palace are long gone. You have to ask yourself: Well, how did they get that picture? Did they chase the car? Then you cannot use that picture. In that particular situation, my personal view was that the papers and the broadcasters could have used those pictures of Kate with her mother. It was interesting that they didn’t. Then they did use a picture of William with her in the car, which wasn’t a very good picture. I mean, she was looking away.

The rota didn’t know the real story: Of course, the readers themselves are hypocrites. Just about every person I’ve met in the last three months, whether they are ardent monarchists, strong republicans, or just completely indifferent, have asked me, “So what’s really wrong with Kate? And what about the king? What type of cancer he’s got?” The truth is I don’t think anybody in the media knew, but I think everybody thinks, Oh, they really know what’s going on, but we didn’t.

When Kensington Palace manipulated a photo & blamed a woman with cancer for the manipulation, the rota felt bad for the KP flunkies: The royal press pack is quite a sensitive group of people, and it’s a lot less brutal than the politics beat is. On a personal level, the members of the royal press pack will never be friends with William and Kate or the king and Camilla. Sometimes we might exchange a bit of banter or conversation, but we know we’re never going to be their friends. Still, when the Mother’s Day photo created that frenzy, I think a lot of the reporters genuinely felt for the couple, and even more so for the press office staff who worked for them. And I think quite a few people messaged the communications secretary at Kensington Palace and others, saying, “We feel for you, and don’t worry too much.”

Kate’s cancer video: There was this frenzy, day after day, that the palace is going to be making a big announcement today and all of us thinking, Nobody’s told us anything. But again, you don’t want to look a fool if you’re wrong. On the Friday they released Kate’s video, I heard there was going to be an announcement, but I’d read that every other day as well. The British press was told at 3:30 that there’s going to be an off-the-record briefing at four o’clock. Everybody was scrambling to make sure that they were by a computer and with a link to tune in.

What happens next: Now everybody’s looking to see, Well, what happens next? Are the king and Kate both going to make a full recovery? I think the British monarchy is going to need to make a bit of a splash perhaps in the second half of this year or early next year to get things back on track because it does feel as if things have been derailed. If they don’t come back that strongly, then that I think will be a worry for the British monarchy because there’s a very small cast of characters who people actually care about. To be frank with you, I think Edward and Sophie are lovely, and Princess Anne is very popular and is admired for just doing that old-fashioned work: opening the hospitals, going to charity shops, whatever. But it’s really just the king and queen and William and Kate who are the box office.

The real feelings about the Sussexes: And of course, we did have Harry and Meghan, and that’s the other element to it, that in spite of what a lot of people abroad think, the British press wanted Harry and Meghan to be there. They embraced Meghan. They thought that she was fantastic box-office material who would help sell a lot of papers, bring about a lot of clicks. But we’ve lost them, and I don’t think there’s much prospect of them coming back for now, because I don’t think the future of the monarchy lies in part-time royals who are off making money.

[From New York Magazine]

We talk so much about the staggering incompetence of the Windsors and their staff, but spare a moment to understand how completely f–ked the royal rota system is. Rota members were sending sympathetic emails to KP staffers after they bungled that Mother’s Day photo to the point where global photo agencies compared KP to North Korea and Iran. Instead of using that moment to apply journalistic pressure on KP to start coming clean, royal reporters were slavishly kissing ass and fussing on those poor dumb courtiers who had just tossed a woman with cancer under the bus for their f–kup. These reporters are not journalists whatsoever – they’re not actually investigating or questioning people with power, they’re merely acting as stenographers to power. The past four months should have been a wake-up call that the rota’s business as usual wasn’t going to cut it anymore. Unfortunately, too many people are invested in this dysfunctional system. This rota reporter is blatantly lying about several things too, including the pressure applied to kill the photo of Kate and Carole in the car. Prince William threatened every paper and they all agreed.

As for what this person says about the Sussexes… I do think the rota looked forward to writing about the Sussexes for years to come, but let’s be clear: the British papers, the rota journalists and the royal commentators were looking forward to destroying Meghan and tearing her apart for the rest of her life. They thought it would be more profitable to lie about her and racially abuse her and make her into the racist trope of an angry Black woman.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

94 Responses to “Royal rota reporter: We weren’t pressured to kill the photo of Princess Kate & Carole”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. AlpineWitch says:

    They’re so full of *beep* that the sewage and waste that our government is dumping in our waterways stinks less than the royal rota.

    Seriously, I’m amazed you cannot smell the stench from the USA.

    • Jais says:

      I’m trying to guess the rota member😂. Idk why but I’m guessing Russel Meyers of the mirror 🤷‍♀️

      • ABritGuest says:

        I think you are right that it’s Russell Myers! In recent interviews he’s talked about how it would be great if H&M visit the uk soon & you could tell he was getting fed up with the Wails before the cancer news. He was not impressed with early years campaign or with Kate not going to Singapore for Earthshot last year. His buyers remorse has been pretty obvious.

        Laughable to claim that they embraced Meghan. Most of the royal correspondents were openly engaging with the Meghan hate accounts on SM & were all in on the palace backed smear campaign. I do think the press & some in the palace diverged on the goals of the smear campaign. I don’t think the press wanted Meghan to leave & can tell they aren’t over not having access to her & the kids.

    • paintybox says:

      I personally didn’t pay much attention until Meghan but then, yes, the stench was pretty noticeable over here!

    • MrsH says:

      Many of us can smell it over here in the US

    • ales says:

      It has all become “lie of the day” and let us blame Meghan for everything that is wrong in the world. The BRF and the BM have no credibility left whatsoever. Where are Williams children, who all have dark brown hair which is often salon bleached to try to enforce the story that they all look just like the Windsors/Spencers. They have not been seen since December and no one is asking why.

  2. equality says:

    Does he really think people believe this BS about how “sensitive” the RR is? Where was that sensitivity in writing about H&M? And using Meghan for clicks is not the same as embracing her or supporting her.

    • Eos says:

      @equality, the hypocricy is maddening. Where was the RR’s ‘sensitivity’ when they relentlessly colluded with the BM in victimizing Meghan so much she miscarried? Where was the collective BM’s ‘sensitivity’ in NY literally trying to do to H&M and Doria what they did to Diana? Chasing someone to the death for clicks is ‘less brutal than the politics beat’? What a warped sense of logic!

    • kirk says:

      Poor me, little ole barking class member. Wah me.
      Just like poor little ole Robo Jobson laughing about dangling Archie off palace balcony. And poor little ole CamToomany who brags about having Kate’s personal cell #, and badgers Montecito CA civil servants for info on Sussex water bill$.

      • esquire says:

        Jobson is very thin-skinned in my experience. He blocked me on twitter once for challenging him on some matter, without my being the slightest bit rude. A very unpleasant encounter. Edit: I haven’t been on twitter/X for years.

  3. Digital Unicorn says:

    Yeah sure – I think they were told to back off it in exchange for the ‘fake’ farm pap stroll.

    Kate’s cancer video didn’t have the desired affect that they wanted it to – plus it keeps getting pointed out just how bad the production quality is and its not what I expect from BBC Studio considering their slate of high profile and award winning work. Am beginning to buy into the theory that they used AI to clean it up in post and then tried to hide it.

    • ML says:

      Digitaal Unicorn, My neighbor works with technology. His best-case reading is that the quality of the video is so poor that no AI was used, but he doesn’t believe that. He honestly thinks it’s been manipulated and believes that BBC Studios would have provided a better quality product.

      • Allyn says:

        My read is similar. I think it’s basically real, but seriously edited. Like, they filmed Kate, edited the audio track so it flowed cleanly, then used digital manipulation on the visual side to smooth the edits. Probably done against a greenscreen (because that would make the editing easier), and the need for editing would also explain why she was by herself (again, to make the editing easier).

  4. Agnes says:

    “Part-time royals off making money” = two people trying to live under their own steam, not mooch off the poors like Teddy Bear hoarding parasites.

    • Feeshalori says:

      You’d normally say earning a living which is what we all do when we need money to pay for our bills, food, mortgage and all the other necessities in life.

    • Shawna says:

      Teddy bears – my husband was howling at all the teddy bears in _Scoop_ when we watched it yesterday.

    • Josephine says:

      This stuck out to me as well. What a world we live in that people who make their own way are criticized and the family whose entire fortune is basically stolen proceeds from others is praised for continuing to take money they don’t need and not working.

  5. Dee(2) says:

    Why do they always say ” making money” about the Sussexes like there is some other way people survive? Most people on this planet have to exchange goods for services in some manner. I guess they’re more so bitter at the being successful at making money part. And the way that they just lie and tell you that you didn’t see what you thought you saw and you didn’t hear what you thought you heard come out of people’s mouth is unbelievable. You absolutely did not support Meghan. Before she was even in the family when she was just a girlfriend, they couldn’t wait to write passive aggressive micro aggressive screeds about her race, her family, her job and her nationality.

    • MoBiMom says:

      This is that aristo bullsh*t about money being something you HAVE, not something you make. So middle class… the Sussexes out there making money. Abolish the monarchy (and the class system).

  6. ML says:

    There’s a curious amount of royal-splaining going on in American publications at the moment, isn’t there? Interesting how the communication from royal sources in British media differs from how they speak and are quoted across the Atlantic!

    How can you be a royal source and not be aware of the invisible contract between the royals and the BM? Supposedly Carole and Kate were papped—that photo wasn’t used in Britain—however, when Kate was supposedly papped with William on the way to the Commonwealth Service, this was okay? Right.

  7. Jais says:

    Embraced Meghan? Ummm, sure if by embrace they mean they were joyful as they carved her up to eat. They were happy to dine out on her for years. And yet they send condolences to KP when they try to trick the public on a North Korean level. Wooow.

    • Christine says:

      My eyeballs bugged out of my head at that part!!! My GAWD, they were worried about the staff at KP?!???

      I actually feel sorry for Kate after this one. Her useless staff and husband threw her entirely under the bus, and then accepted pets and praise from the fucking British media! It’s INSANE!!

      “Don’t mind me, I’ll just sit in the corner with my cancer.” Kate, probably.

  8. Miranda says:

    “They thought that she was fantastic box-office material who would help sell a lot of papers, bring about a lot of clicks.”

    That was/is literally the biggest f–king problem: They didn’t see Meghan as a human being, but as a cash cow. It’s the same thing they did to Diana, though with Meghan the whole thing was made even more disgusting because they threw in some racism as well. That’s precisely why the Sussexes left, rather than see it all end the way it did for Diana.

  9. Alexandria says:

    It’s easy to criticize the rota but I also feel that journalism is ceasing to be a pillar of checks and balances for the past 30 years. It’s a culmination of neoliberalism and hegemony. What’s happening in the UK – the uphold of the ruling class – is happening everywhere else. Just sub the royals with other politicians.

    • Rapunzel says:

      British journalism has never been checks and balances. Like, never ever.

    • Nic919 says:

      There corporatization of media has been the problem because in most countries the local papers are being swallowed up by a few media entities and many of them have right wing agendas.

      The rota and the BRF is still pretty egregious compared to how elected politicians are treated though. While there is access journalism in many places, Maggie Haberman and Trump being an example, the journalists usually don’t treat their subjects as requiring protection to the same extent that the rota does for the BRF and their favourite family members.

    • MaryContrary says:

      I actually think that it’s more that people are way more aware now of how (with rare exception) that it really has never been a pillar of checks and balances. I think legitimate journalism has also gotten more slip shod with how they substantiate their sources. The 24 hour news cycle with cable and now the internet has given rise to so much “news” and there is a pressure to get things out there whether they’re true or not.

    • equality says:

      A big problem is copying and pasting of articles from one outlet to another without scrutiny. And, in the US, the problem of UK ownership of outlets and UK hires to run outlets. That’s what Congress should be concerning themselves with instead of (or in addition to) tech companies.

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Alexandria, when the Fairness Doctrine was thrown out is when the media in the US started going off the rails–not all of them. I think that most of the ‘real’ journalism gets done by local papers. That’s who we should all support. (I’m not saying all of the local papers, but most of them.)

      • BeanieBean says:

        I recently learned that my local home-town newspapers just folder, after over 100 years. Shame, really. And I imagine that’s the case across the US, particularly in the smaller towns.

      • Saucy&Sassy says:

        BeanieBean, that’s why we need to support them so they don’t go out of business. I read that the LA newspaper layed off lots of people. That’s incredibly sad, because they aren’t afraid to do the hard work.

    • esquire says:

      I don’t know about that. I’m no expert, but it’s quite obvious that the rota are PR mouthpieces for the royals. They left their journalistic integrity behind them when they “report” and I use that term loosely. That is not journalism or reporting. It’s PR and one of the complaints by Republic UK – no honest discussion or criticism of the BRF.

      It’s equally as bad in Australia, but we don’t pay for the royal family. It works in their favour because the monarchy is not seen as any kind of threat to us, a benign presence. That’s arguable, but it has kept them reigning over us since c. 1788 – even after the fall of the Empire.

  10. What a load of horse sh*t. The lying liars are trying to cover their asses because that’s what the Rota do they sell lies.

  11. Eurydice says:

    The future of the rota doesn’t look rosy.

    First there’s: “What are we going to do? There’s not going to be anything to write for a couple of months.” Then: “there’s a very small cast of characters who people actually care about.” And we end up on “They thought that she was fantastic box-office material who would help sell a lot of papers, bring about a lot of clicks. But we’ve lost them…”

    Finally, what do they mean the readers are hypocrites – just for asking what the heck is going on?

    • Feeshalori says:

      Yes, I saw that mention about the readers being hypocrites too, and had to go back and reread because that didn’t make sense. Sounds like Opposite Day again.

      • Becks1 says:

        So I took that to mean that supposedly people say Kate and Charles should have their privacy but they actually want to know what’s going on. Like someone might spend hours on social media ranting about how people should leave Kate alone but the instant they meet X person who is a royal reporter they demand to know all the nitty gritty details.

      • Feeshalori says:

        I see, thanks, Becks1.

  12. ML says:

    “… the British press wanted Harry and Meghan to be there. They embraced Meghan. They thought that she was fantastic …”

    What is this idiot on?? Does this person believe that Americans are completely ignorant of how they treated Meghan? The Oprah special? Netflix? We have eyes and ears and the English isn’t that different!

    • rosa mwemaid says:

      They were warmly welcomed at first, apparently, don’t know about social media, but I noticed that the mainstream press seemed to turn against them when Meghan announced her pregnancy, I have always wondered if they objected to mixed race children in the succession.

      • ABritGuest says:

        The press were nasty from the start at every stage. When they found out about H&M dating there was the straight out of Compton, Harry mixing with gangster royalty articles, suggesting Meghan had done porn due to a Suits scene which she had to do legal complaint about, saying how Meghan didn’t meet the mums test & discussing her “exotic Dna” & claiming Doria was from the wrong side of the tracks etc.

        When they got engaged there was an article that Meghan wasn’t suitable because she was a divorcee & another about how some British men preferred Americans because they gave blow jobs earlier. The press went hard interviewing the obviously grifting markles & publicising Thomas markle jnr warning Harry not to marry Meghan. They also tried to pay old co stars to say they slept with Meghan.

        The press obviously timed exposing Thomas markle snr’ pap scheme for the week of the wedding to cause maximum damage. After the wedding & even before the pregnancy announcement & the start of the big press smear campaign against Meghan, the press was using Meghan’s deteriorating relationship with Bad Dad to label her a cruel daughter & to badger her into calling him. She was being insulted by the likes of Piers Morgan every day on uk breakfast tv as a social climber & royal correspondents like Robert Jobson were lying that Meghan had no friends including at her wedding. Then they were the typically gross Madonna/whore headlines they were doing pitting Kate against Meghan claiming that Kate was shy & from a good family compared to “sexual” Meghan from a dysfunctional divorced family

        Even when they reported on successful project like the together cookbook & or successful trips she did before the Oceana tour – there was always some type of negative angle claiming she was breaking imaginary protocol or making out like she was profligate with her clothes spending. They rarely ever gave Meghan credit for a job well done without some type of bitter jibe.

        Now that I know Harry was discussing the phone hacking claims in the background at this time & was restricting royal correspondents’ access to Meghan, I have more understanding of why they were so unpleasant. But no I don’t think the press were welcoming & I would say the only days they were universally pleasant was the engagement day announcement, the wedding day & pregnancy announcement.

    • Square2 says:

      @ML. It’s just like when “baby-shower” Emily A once said on XTwitter that she liked Meghan’s can-do attitude but her newspaper (& KP) gave her marching order the write those hit pieces on Duchess Meg. They knew/know Meghan made them money but they are also racist to boot..

      @ROSA. THE Rota Rats & BM were racists & not welcoming to her right from the get go. They only seemed welcoming when the Oceania tour.

  13. Izzy says:

    NYMag should be embarrassed for running such a lie-baked puff piece about the rota rats and RF.

  14. Amy Bee says:

    I’m going to guess that the royal reporter is either Russell Myers (who still believes that the British press welcomed and supported Meghan) or Chris Ship (who used to be the political reporter for ITV). It’s interesting that the royal reporter didn’t want to be named, he knows he would be bullied by the rest of the rota if he went on the record. What I got out of this piece is that the royal rota are a bunch of sycophants who believe their part of the Palace PR.

    • Jais says:

      My guess upthread was Russel Meyers. And yes interesting that they went anonymous. Can’t be excommunicated by Becky English or any of the royals.

    • Becks1 says:

      I thought Chris Ship as well, and part of me thinks Emily Andrews. Russell Myers is also a possibility.

      It’s someone who wants to protect their future in the rota, thats for sure, but is also getting frustrated with some aspects of it. That’s what makes Chris Ship fit for me.

      • Amy Bee says:

        Emily Andrews said on twitter that KP put pressure on the press not to publish the car pics and she’s no longer a royal reporter. So it’s not her.

      • Becks1 says:

        @AmyBee ah okay thanks. I think I might have blocked her ages ago 🤣🤣

      • Lorelei says:

        Chris Ship is always super defensive so I could definitely believe it’s him. I think that deep down, he’s knows he’s peddling total BS and is frustrated with the turn his career took, hence the constant defensiveness.

    • BeanieBean says:

      On the one hand he claims they’re real journalists, on the other hand he says they can’t think of a thing to write when the royals aren’t out & about. Really? How about a deep dive on the finances? That should occupy a goodly amount of your time. See where that leads. But no, they truly are, as Kaiser says, ‘royal stenographers’.

  15. Interested Gawker says:

    I hope some international journalists get their teeth into this shady business and expose all the rot and the lies and why KP keeps making more problems for themselves by playing peek a boo with this parade of fake imagery, SM, and use of American gossip outlets like Page Six and TMZ. A woman as prominent as the Princess of Wales should not be disappeared like this for months on end.

    William and Kate have a duty to their subjects and position as next in the line of succession to be seen, particularly with Charles being ill.

    I don’t understand the comment about readers being hypocrites; people want to know why the heir is shirking what should be his only responsibility and why KP had the front to fake their photos so egregiously. People can see the explanations about Kate never made sense and want clarity. That isn’t an unreasonable attitude and it’s the press who are meant the get those answers.

  16. Defender of Cats says:

    If we had any proper investigative journalists in the UK they would be looking much closer at the farm shop sighting. Many questions still have been left unanswered:

    Was this two people having a laugh and the sun and Mr Silva fell for it?

    Did the sun take it upon themselves to stage a sighting with paid actors to help defend the firm?

    Did the paper then use photo editing technology to change the faces of the two people to make them more like Bill and Kate? and many more.

    It was quite eerie in real time to see an attempt by the media to make people disbelieve there own eyes.

    • Jais says:

      Possibly but the issue was that KP did not tell them they couldn’t run it, which made it seem like a tacit admission that it was real. So if the Sun got played they got played by KP. Bc if it was truly actors KP could’ve just said that’s not us. Or they were somehow all in it together.

  17. Rapunzel says:

    They were definitely pressured. No other explanation for why they later printed the Will/Kate car photo and farm vid. There’s something about the Carole/Kate pic that wasn’t acceptable. I still say the problem was the fact they were in rental car, which gives away Kate is off someplace where her mum needed to rent a car.

    Are they trying to backtrack now to throw folks off that scent?

    • Becks1 says:

      The british press refusal to run the Carole/Kate car pic was always weird because…..is the british press not aware of the internet? Social media? Everyone saw that picture anyway. If they were trying to hide that it was a rental car – I mean, people figured that out without the DM running the picture. And then to run the other car photo and the farm video just made the british press look worse. Some paparazzi shots are okay, some are not.

      • Defender of Cats says:

        You get the impression that the rota and British press are still living in the pre internet days where they had the monopoly on information broadcasted.

    • Lorelei says:

      Saying that they felt like it was okay to run the William/Kate car photo but not the one with CarolE/Kate because William was on his way to “an official engagement” is a weak excuse.

      I see what they’re trying to do, in keeping with their hypocritical, BS “We never publish paparazzi photos!” stance, but KATE was still on her way to a “private appointment,” so they lost the moral high ground there IMO (not that they ever have it, but they think they do). It was still intrusive to Kate if you believe she was likely headed to a medical appointment.

      • Rapunzel says:

        Lorelei- And that intrusion was made all the worse because you couldn’t even see,Kate’s face! Like, at least the face was visible in the first car pic.

        Not to mention, the second car photo was conveniently timed to distract from the mother’s day Frankenphoto. You notice this reporter didn’t make that connection.

    • BeanieBean says:

      I also find the ‘what will people think of us?’ line of reasoning to be a bit disingenuous. Or just ridiculous. A journalist–I thought–is supposed to be seeking truth on behalf of the public. ‘Will they still like us?’ shouldn’t be part of the equation. It’s not a matter of ‘will the public think we’re treating her like we treated Diana?’ but rather, let’s find a different way to report on this woman rather than chasing her down like a hunted rabbit the way we did the other one.

    • TigerMcQueen says:

      I think what wasn’t acceptable about the Kate/CarolE car pic was that it was a CarolE operation and KP was in the dark that she’d arranged it (very possibly in the dark about all of Kate’s health issues at that point). CarolE looked grim AF in that photo and angry. I’d love to know what was really going on.

  18. Becks1 says:

    I think this RR is covering their ass quite a bit. the part about the photo of Carole and Kate – they don’t say there was absolutely no pressure, they say if there was, they didn’t know about it, and then say they think the british press could have used that photo (which to me implies a disagreement somewhere behind the scenes about it.)

    I absolutely believe the british press wanted Harry and Meghan to stay in the UK because they were such “box office material” but they never embraced them. That’s just what the RRs are trying to insist after the fact to prove that it was Meghan’s fault for leaving, not theirs.

    • Lorelei says:

      I fondly recall the days when outlets like the Fail gleefully published pap shots of Kate caught out shopping the day she was supposed to be “guest editing” HuffPo. Now they all act as if they’re on KP’s payroll.

  19. SussexWatcher says:

    Won’t someone please have a care for the poor rota rats who are losing their jobs and homes after bullying the Sussexes – the real stars and cash cows of the monarchy – out of the country?

    Why won’t anyone hear their wailing and throwing up about what a difficult position they’re in – they have to cover the pale, stale leftovers, dontcha know.

    Doesn’t anyone understand their pleas to be taken seriously as “journalists” while also writing about their fantasies of marrying Harry or letting us know they make calls to the palace to soothe and comfort the fragile royal egos?!

    Won’t anyone have a care for the sad, ass-kissing losers who don’t understand why they have NO credibility when all they’ve done is parrot the lies they’re told from the “palace sources” at KP and BP? Is that really so bad?!

    The poor, poor rota rats. The sad, broke-ass, purple prosing, lying, delusional, bullying, racist rota RATS are losing their homes and their eyelashes! Won’t someone have a care for them???

    • Lorelei says:

      The fact that this person believes they’re a real journalist who reports “facts” is enough to disregard the entire whiny mess.

    • BeanieBean says:

      Hang on a sec, I seem to have lost my tiny violin somewhere…shoot, can’t find it. Ah well.

  20. TheOriginalMia says:

    Reading all those bs quotes makes me feel like that gif of the Real Housewives screaming “Lies! Lies!”

  21. BlueNailsBetty says:

    Re: the photo of Carole and Kate in the car:

    “ Well, how did they get that picture? Did they chase the car? Then you cannot use that picture.”

    Oh please. That photo was clearly photoshopped so no it wasn’t just some random pap clicking a pic. It was Carole’s way of showing Kate was alive and that Carole was the one taking care of Kate while William was nowhere to be seen.

    And that is why KP sent kill orders on the photo.

    I don’t know if there is hinkiness about the cancer photo but the Kate in the car photo and the Kate in the video sure don’t look like the same person. So it wouldn’t surprise me if there was something hinky going on with the video.

  22. Shawna says:

    “But on the royal beat, it’s much more than that. You have to think, Well, what are the readers going to say? The editors think, How is this going to look?”

    Is that more — or is it LESS? Facts go out the window.

  23. Lili says:

    Interesting! It seems the rota have been ordered to eat crow with regards to the Sussexes, but won’t tell them why, I think we need to watch this space, this might be the slow walk to Harry becoming Regent

    • Amy Bee says:

      Yeah, that’s not going to happen.

    • Renae says:

      I would think that would require Harry to move back to Britain.
      I don’t think Meghan would do so and Harry isn’t going to leave his family so……ain’t happening.

  24. SamuelWhiskers says:

    These rats need to STOP LYING.

    I honestly don’t think we’ll ever find out who was in the car photo, or the farm shop video.

  25. Defender of Cats says:

    The rota do not seem in the least bothered by the metamorphosis for Kates face over a relatively short period of time.

    First the fuller face in the car with Carole, then back to normal Kate in the Mothers Day photo with her children. We then get a new face in the farm shop sighting followed again by the return of normal Kate in her announcement video.

    • rosa mwemaid says:

      Kate looked ten years younger in the mother’s day photo and fit and well, the children are the right age. But is was obvious that it was fixed before I saw the other mistakes.

  26. Saucy&Sassy says:

    It always amuses me that the bm still think they control the narrative. Of course, Murdoch’s media will do everything to help them. Here’s the problem: 1) there are way too many articles out there pre or post H&M leaving the UK that shows the opposite of what this article states; 2) the Sussex Squad is no shy about sending them around in sm to prove the point; and 3) people saw the Oprah interview, Harry & Meghan and read Spare with Harry’s interviews. The bm supported Meghan?

    This is just more of the bm trying to save its reputation in the US. Geez, they ought to go after Spain since that’s where the coma report came from.

    The US media which still finds INTEGRITY of importance is not going to fall into line. The rrs need to look in the dictionary for the definition of the word–they might learn something.

    • BeanieBean says:

      That is actually kinda funny. ‘Oh, sh*t, US media is writing about this? We can’t just write whatever we want without being questioned?’ What to do, what to do?

  27. Jaded says:

    The Wails are becoming more and more toxic as the days go by and the fakery continues unabated. Despite the long friendship between the Wails, Windsors and Bonnevilles, this situation is making it more and more evident that the Wails are living separate lives and my bet is that Willnot shows up solo while Kate continues to twist in the wind. She was never accepted by the toffs and the Bonneville wedding would NOT be a good move on her part to stage a comeback. I wonder how much of the truth is known by the aristo inner circle…if indeed the illness, mental or physical or both, was precipitated by some horrible behaviour on the part of Willnot. He could well be considered social poison as a result.

  28. Mary Pester says:

    Well I hope some kind soul has bought this idiot a minors helmet, because he’s gonna need the head torch to find his way out of Billy or Charlie’s ass, because one of them spoon fed him this Colomb. He should just have written a very short peice saying “yeah we lie and print bullsht but, it’s lies and bullsht with royal approval so we don’t actually care what you think! Truth is now a dirty word for the rota, and I hope Kates reading all this, because if Billy ignores what his father wants, they will be coming for her when she’s seen out and about again.

    • Liz says:

      They could use the head torch to find Kate too. I don’t believe she’s actually been seen since December 🔦

    • Saucy&Sassy says:

      Mary Pester, I’m going to assume that means if Billy Idle continues being invisible at events that KFC will not be pleased. It’s seemed pretty obvious the KP and BP were doing their own briefing, but it sounds like it could get a lot more interesting.

      Are you at home now, Mary? It sounds like they take really good care of you in the hospital, but there’s nowhere better to be than home. I know your hubby must have missed you.

      • Mary Pester says:

        @saucy&sassy, yes lovey home again, but I’m not sure hubby realised it was my daughter here and not me lol, but he hasn’t left my side and is lay beside me now.
        Billy is indeed intent on doing his own “thing”, and Charlie is fine with a side peice but oh my the sht is going to hit the fan soon, now it depends if bone is seen out and about before “that” wedding, because the guest list is looking radio active,, maybe rota will have cameras near the gates! You know how they love to look at ladies hats.
        Pity Easter was a wash out for them.

    • bisynaptic says:

      Oh, no!: it’s the readers who are hypocrites, don’t you know…

    • 6onethree6 says:

      Was that misspelling of Minor deliberate Mary 🙂

  29. Over it says:

    I bet this person is Arthur Edwards. Sounds like his bs ass kissing

  30. Eos says:

    To say “I think the British monarchy is going to need to make a bit of a splash” is sort of a veiled threat under the clock of concern. The choreography that would have been Kate’s Easter resurrection was crippled by the potential leak and KP was forced to preemptively release her cancer diagnosis. Plus, the farm video, which possibly was one part of the resurrection package, was a dud on its own. The British media is getting nervous; no clicks, no revenue. The beast has to be fed hence the warning, “If they don’t….worry for the British monarchy”.

  31. QuiteContrary says:

    “The royal press pack is quite a sensitive group of people, and it’s a lot less brutal than the politics beat is.”

    So I’m sure the rota was really upset by Jeremy Clarkson’s vile piece about Meghan, right? They must have really dragged him for being so vicious, because they’re so sensitive. Oh, wait …

  32. bisynaptic says:

    This was atrociously written. “These reporters are not journalists whatsoever“—exactly.

  33. Viccles says:

    Could someone kindly tell me what ROTA means please? Thinking first word is Royal but then I’m stumped. Thanks.