King Charles’s staff was ‘appalled’ by Prince Harry’s ‘glib’ words on Charles’s health

Robert Hardman’s Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story was originally published in January 2024. The book – which was serialized by the Daily Mail – got a lot of attention because Hardman claimed that Queen Elizabeth was incandescent with rage over Prince Harry naming his daughter Lilibet. After everyone piled on and confirmed that yes, QEII absolutely hated the Sussexes for naming their daughter in her honor, Hardman had to walk it back and pretend like he never wrote any of that. Well, funny story. He’s reissuing the book with new chapters and a complete rewrite on certain sections, one would think. Once again, the Mail has exclusive excerpts and they are a hoot! I wonder how much of this Hardman will have to walk back in the coming weeks. Some highlights:

Prince Harry’s appearance in court in April of this year: Days later, [Harry] appeared in Britain as his legal team took his long-running case against the British Government to the Court of Appeal. There was no need for him to appear. Many legal experts could see no reason for his presence in the court, scribbling on Post-it notes and sipping water as his barrister pressed his challenge to a Home Office decision to remove his right to automatic police protection in the UK. ‘He seemed to be pitch-rolling ahead of what was likely to be a humiliating court decision,’ was how the King’s team regarded his short visit to London, especially as there was no prospect of seeing his father, who was away on his state visit to Italy.

King Charles offered Harry a room at Buckingham Palace in April: Yet after hearing he was coming to London, the King had still offered him accommodation at Buckingham Palace during his stay. ‘Once again, he said no – presumably because the Palace is still so unsafe – and ended up staying in a hotel,’ said a member of staff, struggling to hide the sarcasm in light of what the Duke did next.

Harry’s Ukraine trip: After leaving London, he went to Ukraine to meet wounded soldiers. Aside from the glaring inconsistency of claiming that Britain was fraught with danger one day and then travelling to a war zone the next, Prince Harry also had the satisfaction of stealing a march on his brother. The trip to Lviv had certainly come as a surprise to Prince William, who, as an ex-serviceman himself, had long wanted to visit Ukraine….Thus far, however, the Prince of Wales had been limited to a visit to the Mercians, of which he was Colonel-in-Chief, in Estonia.

Prince Harry’s surprise BBC interview in May: It all felt like a ‘good old-fashioned Establishment stitch-up’, the Duke half-joked, before alluding gravely to his mother’s death: ‘Some people want history to repeat itself and that’s pretty dark.’ For the foreseeable future, Britain would remain too dangerous for his children. There was a wistful but jarringly tactless note at the very end, when the Duke was asked about reconciliation: ‘I don’t know how much longer my father has – he won’t speak to me because of this security stuff but it would be nice to reconcile.’ Prospects for that, however, had just receded further. Within royal circles in Britain, some were ‘frankly appalled’ by his glib choice of words about the King’s health.

Buckingham Palace’s reaction to his BBC interview: Within the Royal Household, there was both exasperation and incredulity that Prince Harry could expect any sort of rapprochement after springing yet another effusion of scattergun accusations on the family via the media. There was considerable irritation that the Prince and the BBC had arranged a landmark interview about royal security issues yet the first the Palace was aware of it was minutes before broadcast. ‘As the Duke of Sussex might say, it felt like a bit of a stitch-up,’ reflected one member of staff.

The palace is mad that Harry shows up for court appearances: Royal staff had noticed something else, too. It was starting to feel a little more than coincidental that when the King was on important business overseas, the Duke of Sussex would suddenly emerge from his hard-won privacy to make a high-profile public appearance. In March 2023, as the King was embarking on the first overseas state visit of his reign to Germany, Prince Harry had unexpectedly – and unnecessarily – flown to London to watch the preliminaries of one of his various court cases. When the King was beginning his 2025 state visit to Italy, Harry had done the same again. A few weeks later, as the King flew to Canada, his younger son made a surprise appearance in Shanghai at a conference on sustainable tourism. ‘Only a cynic could possibly detect a pattern there,’ observed one courtier, with mild amusement.

King Charles doesn’t care about Harry! There was one person, however, who seemed wholly unconcerned by the latest Sussex grievance. Even in private, the King showed no interest in discussing the matter. ‘People are always saying that he must be so upset by the Harry business,’ says one member of his inner circle, ‘but when you have all that is going on in his world, you don’t have time to agonize over things beyond your control.’ Back channels remained open, however. There was much excitement when the King’s press communications secretary was spotted having a drink with the latest Sussex media manager during a London visit in July. Some commentators even hailed it as a ‘peace summit’, to the surprise of Palace insiders, who had regarded it as a courtesy call.

[From The Daily Mail]

This excerpt ended with a long-winded description of some details of the planning for Operation London Bridge, aka King Charles’s funeral. Weird, because Hardman and the courtiers were super-mad about Charles’s son even mentioning that Charles might not have much time left, and then Charles’s biographer is in such a rush to talk about the king’s funeral??

Anyway, the funniest part is that courtiers are banging their heads against the wall because Harry flies in and out of London whenever he feels like it and he rarely gives them a heads up. Harry was burned last year when he came to London for the Invictus anniversary service, a well-publicized event for which the palace had months of preparatory time. They prepared for Charles to publicly snub Harry and they put a ton of busywork on the king’s schedule, including Charles handing off the Army Air Corps patronage to William. Those same courtiers were furious when Harry ruined all of their plans by publicly announcing that he wasn’t going to see his father because of his father’s schedule. Charles looked like an a–hole. That’s what bugs them – Harry effortlessly exposes Charles constantly, and Harry is always making William look lazy and dumb. As for the larger bitching about Harry’s schedule and appearances… like I’ve said for years, if the left-behinds wanted a say in Harry and Meghan’s schedules and lives, they really should have taken the Sussexes up on their half-in offer. It worked out better this way though.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

21 Responses to “King Charles’s staff was ‘appalled’ by Prince Harry’s ‘glib’ words on Charles’s health”

  1. North of Boston says:

    Charles? King Charles? The guy who said something like “it won’t matter to most people if something were to happen to him” about his own son?
    What’s he mad about?

  2. Harry outsmarts them at every turn and they become incandescent with rage when he does lol. Then we get these outrageous articles of lies about Harry dissing the King and how the now dead and buried Queen, who is suddenly more than willing to talk, hated that Harry named his daughter Lilibet!

  3. Blogger says:

    They really know they fucked up. So much derangement in the excerpts.

    Yes, he doesn’t want to stay in the Palace because you’ll try to bring in a rat in to write 10000 articles during his stay. The Palace can’t be trusted.

    As for this:

    “however, the Prince of Wales had been limited to a visit to the Mercians, of which he was Colonel-in-Chief, in Estonia.”

    Where’s the fridge? I’m sure if Willy really wanted to do, he would be at Kyiv. But good luck getting him to turn up to VJ80.

    Try again rats and platinum plated courtiers 😏

  4. JENNIFER says:

    So will a journalist in Britain, (if they have an impartial publication), ebmver ask a courtier, or just wonder loudly, why the courtiers talk like they are puppet masters?
    What power do the royals really have?
    Also, why do they with such contempt about Harry? I mean with Meghan, I can understand, race, xenophobia and all of that is a factor.
    But Harry?
    Also is this how they speak about William, Charles and the rest of them behind their backs?

  5. Dee(2) says:

    It’s not glib to point out that a 75-year-old man with cancer may not be long for this mortal coil. Also, it’s dangerous in the UK because your media environment and the complete abandonment of any defense by his family has shown people that they can target him without any real repercussion. He’s safer in Ukraine simply because no one is being told it’s open season on him there.

    Also, as for Harry taking away attention from Charles or William he does not work for you. You have made it clear you don’t want to have any familial relationship with him, and he stopped working for the family business 5 years ago. There’s not a company on this planet that can reasonably expect for a former employee to make decisions about their own movements based off of what the CEO and the COO are doing a half decade later.

    • KC says:

      I came here to bring up this point. Diana was safer in an Angolan minefield than she was driving in a car in Paris because of the paparazzi. Harry is safer in a f*ucking live war zone than in the UK. He doesn’t make the rules – he’s just living in their reality.

    • KristenfromMA says:

      I wondered if glib is defined differently in the UK. How could his words be viewed as glib? (rhetorical)

  6. Eurydice says:

    If they had accepted H&M’s offer of half-in, then I wouldn’t have apricot spread.

  7. Becks1 says:

    The press is invested in making Harry’s security argument seem hypocritical or inconsistent, when the reality is that he has different security needs in the UK because of the hatred the press has stirred up, and that other countries – even Ukraine – provide him additional security when he travels there (the type of security he’s requesting in the UK) because they want him there and they want him safe. But its better for the press to make it sound like Harry is worried about being pickpocketed or something, rather than actively targeted.

  8. Monika says:

    So the royal circle is appalled about Harry talking about his father’s health but the same people are happy to talk about Charles funeral plans. Were they not part of Tobyn Andreae’s What’s App group? Hardman apparently did not get the message.

    The Palace was not informed about the BBC interview. We know that the Palace like to control what is reported about them and want to know exactly what is in any report about them so that they can influence the content and torpedo any unwelcome information.

  9. MsIam says:

    What about that article about Charles’s funeral plans and then cheering on “roles” he wanted the Sussexes to play, including their kids? What about tall of William’s talk of his coronation and future rein? Don’t all of those involved Charles’s death too? Or am I not understanding something? I guess Harry has been living in the US for too long because how dare he speak about someone with cancer actually dying? Especially someone going on 80 with cancer. The nerve!

  10. Tessa says:

    There are articles in the media about the bestest future king and queen consort ever and what peggs will do. Would not that bother c and c

  11. jais says:

    So William was really mad about the ukraine thing huh? And imagine getting mad that Harry wants to be there for his court cases. Of course he does. Looking forward to the DM one coming up.

  12. bisynaptic says:

    LOL “It’s just his court case—he doesn’t need to be there!” 😂

  13. J.Ferber says:

    I disagree Harry’s words were glib. He was honest and sad. Better than Will rubbing his hands in glee. “It’s almost all mine! Die, old man.”

  14. Libra says:

    I’m at the age when I can say to my children that I may not have many years left, which is true, according to actuaries. I use that phrase to guilt them into helping with projects.

  15. Amy Bee says:

    Can any author write about book about the royals and/or promote it without talking about Harry?

  16. Kate says:

    What I find so sad is when Charles dies, no one will really care, except Harry. His wife doesn’t seem to spend time with him, It’s obviously willy hates him and is just waiting for him to die. The rest don’t seem like a family, maybe it’s different behind the scenes but from what Harry said I doubt it.

  17. Lurker says:

    “when the King’s press communications secretary was spotted having a drink with the latest Sussex media manager” Nice dig here, he just couldn’t resists. The Sussex 2nd media manager after leaving Salty Island. How many press secretaries had Lazy & Lazier in the last 5 years, before Jason came back?

  18. martha says:

    Can you imagine what a boost it would’ve been to the Royal image if they’d showed up in force to support the Invictus Games church service? Their non-appearance just looked petty, cruel, and disrespectful to service members.

    Honestly – if Chuck can throw a state dinner for Trump because PM asks him to …

    would be interesting to know exactly how conversations behind the scenes went re the IG service, but people like Robert Hardman don’t really have sources in BP.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment