Prince Harry ‘could be trusted one-on-one’ with his dad, without Camilla in the room

By now, everyone knows that Prince Harry met his father at Clarence House one week ago. Royal reporters have ranted, raved and openly threatened Harry: speak one word about the meeting, and the king will never speak to you again! Those reporters have been told those instructions in (you guessed it) briefings from King Charles’s office. Charles wants to control the narrative around the meeting entirely. Well, unsurprisingly, that control extends to American media. It looks like Us Weekly and People Magazine both got talking points from the palace. From People’s exclusive:

Harry & Charles’s meeting: [Last week’s trip] was a far cry from the Harry, 41, seen on recent visits, when court appearances and legal battles overshadowed everything else. This was not the Duke of Sussex under scrutiny, but the Harry people remembered — approachable, playful, in his element. And on the rainy afternoon of Sept. 10, that same energy carried him through the gates of Clarence House, where he disappeared inside for a long-awaited, private meeting with his father, King Charles. Fifty-three minutes later, he emerged — a historic and emotional encounter behind him, and the fragile possibility of reconciliation ahead. “It’s a massive step in the right direction,” Queen Elizabeth’s former spokeswoman Ailsa Anderson tells PEOPLE in this week’s issue. “It’s a building of trust.”

A starting point: At stake wasn’t just Harry’s connection with his father, Charles, but also his relationship with his brother Prince William, which remains a thorny and unresolved part of the family story. While the encounter marked a hopeful step forward, royal insiders caution that a long road lies ahead before full reconciliation can take place. “It shows the way forward,” acknowledges an insider with ties to both sides. “It is a good starting point.”

The whole reason why Charles met with Harry: In May, hours after losing his legal battle with the U.K. government over the removal of his official, all-encompassing security, Harry made blunt public comments about how the King wouldn’t speak to him, even saying he had no idea “how much longer my father has.” Those remarks stung many in the U.K. — both inside and outside the palace.

Harry better not speak!! Close observers of the family dynamic will be paying careful attention to what happens next. Much of the focus will be on whether Harry chooses to speak publicly about the meeting with his father. “If we hear nothing, there will be another meeting. If we hear something, it will be a very long time before there is one,” says Robert Hardman, author of The Making of a King: King Charles III and the Modern Monarchy, tempering much of the excitement. Adds historian Robert Lacey: “It is going to have to be handled with care, as the palace sees it, for the foreseeable future. There’s no reason why, in theory, everything should be on an even keel, but it could go the other way, too.”

Camilla’s absence at the meeting: Understanding appears to be building, however. The last time father and son met, just after Charles announced his cancer diagnosis, Queen Camilla had been in the room with them — but she did not accompany her husband to London for this trip. “The fact that Camilla wasn’t there – when she was before — would show that Harry has signaled something to him that he could be trusted one-on-one,” royal author Sally Bedell Smith points out.

[From People]

Something curious: the February 2024 meeting between father and son has been completely rewritten before our eyes. Harry received police protection for that 24-hour visit, there was a police escort waiting for him at Heathrow. Meaning, Charles actually wanted him there, and wanted to see him. Initially, we were told that father and son met alone, and then Camilla called up all of her media allies and insisted that she was in the room too. I still don’t believe that. Just as I believe that Charles purposefully didn’t include Cam in last week’s meeting as well. Anyway, I’m very curious to see what happens next. Will Charles actually make the bold step of inviting the Sussex family to visit?

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “Prince Harry ‘could be trusted one-on-one’ with his dad, without Camilla in the room”

  1. Gaffney says:

    Harry doesn’t leak. They leak and he clears up any lies. They still haven’t learned.

  2. MsIam says:

    So now the meeting is down to 53 minutes? These folks are so ridiculous. Harry is a much better person than me, I would have no patience for this foolishness. I wonder if they keep reporting different time lengths for the meeting to see if Harry offers a correction? Then they can accuse him of “leaking”.

  3. Jais says:

    Harry isn’t going to talk about the meeting. But will Camilla, William or one of the courtiers leak details to make it seem like Harry did? Guess we’ll see.

  4. Miranda says:

    “Trusted one-on-one”? Jesus, they act like Harry was planning to tackle his father and smother him with a sofa cushion. He’s not William, FFS.

  5. Tessa says:

    Sally trashed Diana now she’s doing same to harry

    • Julia says:

      Poor Sally I hope she lives to see the end of the monarchy because its demise will be partly her fault! She is one of the people responsible for turning it into a soap opera played out in the media!

  6. Lover says:

    Can’t trust Harry if Camilla’s not there? More like can’t trust Charles to be sufficiently cold and cruel to Harry if Camilla isn’t there.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment