Prince Edward was renting out Bagshot Park buildings & pocketing the profits

The British press and British politicians were so mad at Prince Andrew last year that they started talking sh-t about all of the other left-behind Windsors. It was glorious there for a minute, and it really did feel like the Windsors’ self-dealing, slumlording and taxpayer-exploiting would all come in for serious scrutiny. Of course, nothing really happened after that. But we did get some new information, especially about the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, aka Prince Edward and Sophie. Ed & Sophie live in Bagshot Park, which they rent from the Crown Estate. Edward made some kind of crazy deal with the Crown Estate where he pays “peppercorn rent” – effectively a minuscule sum – for a 120-room palace with extensive grounds, stables and out-buildings. Well, it gets even worse. It turns out, Edward and Sophie were pocketing a tidy profit by subletting some converted stables on their estate. Insane.

Prince Edward and Sophie raked in up to £130,000 a year sub-letting converted stables on a £30million estate where they pay only a peppercorn rent.

Stables next to the 120-room main house leased from the Crown Estate at Bagshot Park, Surrey, have been let out with profits going to the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh rather than taxpayers. And we can reveal the block, 400 metres from the 120-room main house, was recently advertised as office space for £10,834 a month, or £130,008 a year.

The building currently has no tenants. It appeared to be taken off the market around December when the Public Accounts Committee began asking questions about the financing of royal homes.

The stables have previously been rented out for profit for the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh and are being refurbished with plans to put them on the market again this summer, The Sun understands.

Crown Estate revenues should flow to the public purse. And critics argue Edward, 62 — the King’s youngest brother and 15th-in-line to the throne — already gets a favourable deal to live at Bagshot Park.

Lib Dem former Home Affairs minister Norman Baker said last night: “Any money raised from those stables should only be going to one place — the Crown Estate. Crown Estate profits go directly to the Treasury, so it is the taxpayer who is losing out here.”

Mr Baker added of Edward and Sophie’s moneymaker: “It provides a very stable income, and on top of paying virtually nothing for Bagshot Park they are raking in a whole lot more money from other sources. It’s an outrage they pay a peppercorn rent as it is and now Edward and Sophie are free to rake in £130,000 for a stable block as part of the deal. It is outrageous. The Public Accounts Committee should honour its part of the investigation and take into account leases and see which are unnecessary and unjustified when ordinary people are struggling to pay bills.”

Royal expert and author Margaret Holder added: “It is a nice little earner particularly if you are already on a peppercorn rent. It isn’t Sophie and Edward’s fault because the system in place allows them to make extra money. But I hope the committee go through all of these lease deals with a fine-tooth comb and examine who is making extra-curricular money from cushy deals.”

A royal source said: ‘‘The property in question is not rented to any tenant and it is not on the market.” It is understood the converted stables have been empty since the last tenant moved out in October.

[From The Sun]

I cackled at “The building currently has no tenants. It appeared to be taken off the market around December when the Public Accounts Committee began asking questions about the financing of royal homes.” Whoopsie! The very moment there was scrutiny on all of these cushy royal rental deals, that’s when Edward and Sophie took their own sublets off the market. That’s how bold they were too, just listing those rentals on the open market!! The terse statement from the “royal source” is hilarious too – “The property in question is not rented to any tenant and it is not on the market.” So it’s not being rented NOW? When did the property last have a tenant? How much did the tenant pay? Did Edward and Sophie pocket all of their rental income? What a big fat scam.

Photos courtesy of Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “Prince Edward was renting out Bagshot Park buildings & pocketing the profits”

  1. Lamb Chop says:

    That’s been well known for decades. Odd that basic eddy is being thrown under the bus. He’s rude, stupid and toxic, like the rest them. But throwing him, one person who does some shit, as pathetic as it may be, under the bus is a wild choice. Smacks of protecting willy nilly at all costs.

    • Mayp says:

      Agreed, @lamb chop. This was always known and it was my understanding that the funds help maintain Bagshot Park, which can’t be cheap.

    • Sankay says:

      Everyone can and will be thrown under the bus before the King and/or heir is, which is a true tragedy.

  2. SussexWatcher says:

    Is anyone really surprised? The whole system is a scam. Every single Leftover Royal is a scammer. The monarchy is set up to scam the British people and people of the Commonwealth nations. Why wouldn’t these two do what they see the monarch doing?

    This also just seems like a distraction from the pedos in the family. Look over here at Harry and Meghan, Beatrice and Edo, Edward and Sofiesta *distract distract distract* while Chuckles and Scooter go completely uninvestigated, Fergie is on the lam, and Andrew is getting RPO security and living free in a royal property.

    • ShazBot says:

      I know royalists love to take Meghan’s supposed comment “I can’t believe I’m not getting paid for this” as a knock against her but if she said it, she was right!!
      This is the stuff that happens when nobody has a salary or their own money – it’s all grifting and shadowy finances.
      If they were serious about cleaning up the RF, all working royals outside of Charles and William, with the duchies, would be given salaries and their rents would be public.
      The problem has always been that the monarch has all the money and nobody else has anything.
      It’s so weird to me that the Queen bought homes for Anne and Andrew but not Edward. She gave him the short stick there.

  3. Morning says:

    What would upkeep and renovation on a place like that run? In most rental situations, that is the responsibility of the owner, i.e. Crown Estate. If they are renting out buildings to maintain and improve the estate, then I would say this is more good stewardship than a money making scheme. It all depends on the numbers.

    • Jais says:

      It would also need to be transparent. As in, was all the rent money used to maintain the estate or was some of it used to finance a ski trip. By not going through the CE, there’s room to play. Maybe there are receipts to show that every cent went into upkeep but….. considering how they stopped renting as soon as it started getting investigated, I don’t think that was the case. They stopped renting bc there was some sketchiness and they knew it. I’m sure some of it went into upkeep but I’m betting not all of it.

      • Becks1 says:

        Exactly my thoughts.

        Let’s say the Crown Estate might spend 200k a year upkeeping Bagshot Park (no clue, just making up numbers.) That 130k goes towards the upkeep so now the Crown Estate is only spending 70k. That seems like a win for the Crown Estate.

        But if the CE is still spending 200k a year while Sophie and Edward pocket that 130k – even if they spend it on Bagshot Park in one form or another, its not changing what the Crown Estate spends – then its a different story.

        Like @Jais said, for me the tell is that they stopped renting it as soon as it started being investigated.

  4. Kittenmom says:

    Would we call this putting a foot wrong? LOL.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment