Prince William & Kate were furious about Sarah Ferguson’s claims about QEII’s dogs

Sarah Ferguson is still in the wind. No one knows where she is, and the British press would rather pocket-watch the Duke and Duchess of Sussex from thousands of miles away than actually work some leads and figure out where the hell Sarah has been since her ex-husband’s arrest. Well, over the weekend, the Sun reported a completely bizarre piece of gossip. First, some backstory: in Queen Elizabeth II’s final years, she did not want to leave any dogs orphaned by her passing. She stopped breeding or buying corgis years beforehand, and her last dog died in 2020. Then Prince Philip passed away in 2021, so Prince Andrew thought it would be a good idea to “cheer up” his mother with a series of puppies. One puppy died very soon after arriving at Windsor Castle, so Andrew gave his mother two more puppies, Muick and Sandy. When QEII died in 2022, the two dogs were sent back to Andrew and Fergie at Royal Lodge, and Andrew currently has the dogs with him at Wood Farm at the Sandringham estate.

Well, according to the Sun, Sarah Ferguson “pitched” a television show to American producers where “the Queen’s dogs” would be cloned and the cloning process would be filmed or something. You have to understand, Sarah basically made those dogs into her whole raison d’etre after QEII’s passing. Sarah gave interview after interview about the dogs and how she believes that QEII communicates with her through the dogs. She was probably trying to monetize those dogs in some convoluted way, I’m sure. But I don’t really believe that she pitched a dog-cloning TV show, and her rep has already denied it. In any case, that Sun story became the catalyst for Tom Sykes to drop an exclusive about how the Prince and Princess of Wales felt about Sarah and those fakakta dogs.

Prince William and his wife, Catherine, the Princess of Wales, were left “appalled” after Sarah Ferguson claimed the Queen was communicating with her from beyond the grave through her Corgis, I can exclusively reveal.

Sarah took to telling friends and family, to William and Catherine’s intense irritation, that the Queen used the corgis to communicate with her from beyond the grave, and that she and the dogs could feel Elizabeth’s presence when she walked them to some of the late Queen’s favorite spots in Windsor Great Park, where she and Andrew lived in Royal Lodge, the 10-bedroom former home of the Queen Mother (another Corgi lover as the below pic shows).

William and Catherine, along with those who actually cared for and spent time with the Queen in her final months, such as her oldest friend and dresser, Angela Kelly, thought it was a bizarre and tasteless way for Sarah to boast, erroneously in their opinion, of her spiritual closeness to Elizabeth.

They also found it distasteful that Sarah pretended to friends that she had been “left” the dogs in the late sovereign’s will, when, in fact, they were simply returned to Andrew and Sarah who had given the Queen the dogs, Sandy and Muick, without consulting with other members of the family, in 2021.

The Queen had been an enthusiastic breeder and owner of Corgis and Dorgis (a Corgi /Daschund cross created after an unplanned pregnancy between one of her dogs and one of Princess Margaret’s Dachshunds) since her teenage years. However, like many conscientious pet owners, she did not want her pets to be orphaned after her death and she told friends at the time that her last dog would be the Dorgi, Vulcan, who died, in late 2020, during the Covid pandemic. Vulcan is thought not to have been directly descended from her first Corgi, Susan, given to her by her father George VI, when she was 18, but she had certainly bred Vulcan and several of his ancestors herself.

By the time Muick and then Sandy arrived in mid 2021, the Queen was already severely ill with bone cancer and increasingly reliant on a wheelchair behind closed doors. Less than a year after their arrival, in February 2022, her office announced that she was struggling with “episodic mobility problems.” She died in September 2022.

I am told she never walked the dogs. One friend told me: “They were an unhelpful and unasked for gift from her son. She took her responsibilities to dumb animals very seriously. She knew Charles and William didn’t like Corgis, and she made it very clear she did not want the dogs on her conscience. The sight of them being walked round Wood Farm by a footman is tragic, and it shows just how prescient she was.”

[From The Royalist Substack]

While it’s rare for me to take William and Kate’s side on any subject, I think they had every right to be irritated by the dog saga in QEII’s final year. It was extremely stupid and short-sighted for Andrew to give his dying mother PUPPIES in her final year-and-a-half. It’s even more appalling that Andrew and Fergie then tried to milk that association after QEII’s death. “She took her responsibilities to dumb animals very seriously” is WILD though! Now, all that being said, this is sort of a retcon about QEII’s final years. They’re trying to say that Charles, William and Kate spent a lot of time with QEII after Philip’s death, when that simply wasn’t true. The reason why Andrew got so much out of his mother was because he was the one visiting her constantly.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images and Sarah’s Instagram.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

22 Responses to “Prince William & Kate were furious about Sarah Ferguson’s claims about QEII’s dogs”

  1. What aren’t the Wail’s furious about? That’s their whole schtick. One is always incandescent with rage and when it’s the two of them they are furious! If they thought it would be bad for the dogs to go back to the pedo and his ex they could have offered to take them but that’s not who they are they rather complain and be furious then help!!!

    • 1stTimer says:

      Oh, but Wils does not like corgies! Hateful ass.

      • 2131Jan says:

        Is there ANYTHING he DOES like, other than AV football and drinking? Oh, and cracking putdown “jokes” at others’ expense?

    • 810Mama says:

      👆👆👆💯

    • MY3CENTS says:

      It seems they aren’t furious about sexual assault, Pedos, or trafficking of girls, but other than that they are furious 24/7.

      • Tessa says:

        Just about the late Queen’s dogs. and instead of it being about their connections with Epstein, they complain about Andrew and his ex and the corgis.

      • Dee(2) says:

        And people attending garden parties, horse races, and traveling on their own dime to other countries. That other stuff though? Pales in comparison to those horrific crimes.

      • Elly says:

        @My3cents Good point

      • BeanieBean says:

        They’re not really furious about the dogs–‘dumb animals’, no less 🙄–they’re furious they’re claiming a closer relationship to The Queen. As though William & Kate–a grandson & his wife–were closer to her than one of her own sons & his wife.

        The reality is Kate & William are close to no one, not even each other.

  2. Eurydice says:

    “William and Catherine, along with those who actually cared for and spent time with the Queen in her final months, such as her oldest friend and dresser, Angela Kelly, thought it was a bizarre and tasteless way for Sarah to boast, erroneously in their opinion, of her spiritual closeness to Elizabeth.”

    It’s clever phrasing to make it seem that W&K “were along” with others in caring for Elizabeth, when they were only “along with” with others in thinking Sarah was bizarre and tasteless. Language is wonderful that way.

  3. Jay says:

    Yup, I remember being appalled at the time at Andrew “gifting” multiple puppies to his ailing, elderly mother who emphatically did not want them and could not take care of them. So I guess that puts me on the same side as the Wales, but I get the sense that they are more annoyed and embarrassed at Fergie’s grifting than actually concerned about the dogs or QEII’s welfare.

    Also, I am reading that comment about “taking her responsibilities to dumb animals very seriously” as an aside about Andrew.

  4. QuiteContrary says:

    So many headlines and stories could read: “Prince William & Kate were furious about …” (fill in the blanks, Mad Libs-style).

    They had a point in this rare instance, though I agree that the wording here is insane: “They were an unhelpful and unasked for gift from her son. She took her responsibilities to dumb animals very seriously. She knew Charles and William didn’t like Corgis …”

    Dumb animals?? Those dogs probably have more emotional intelligence than all the left-behinds combined.

    And of course, William doesn’t like corgis …

    • Eurydice says:

      Dumb is a very outdated term that was used to mean “unable to speak.” So, “dumb animals” are just animals that can’t speak for themselves. But don’t tell that to my cat.

  5. Brassy Rebel says:

    If only she had taken her responsibilities to dumb, predator sons half as seriously as her responsibilities to dumb animals!

  6. Blujfly says:

    William is furious every time it becomes public that anyone but himself or his family had relationships with any of the monarchs. Getting the puppies might have been dumb but to him the real crime here is the proximity to the Queen. Also love how after participating in multi year coverup of the Queen’s health to the public, Sykes now blithely writes that she was severely ill with bone cancer in 2021, a full year or more before her death.

  7. Me at home says:

    William doesn’t like corgis? It always amazes me what KP thinks is positive press for William.

    I mean, I’ve never had corgis, but my Scottish grandmother had a string of them, and they were all perfectly nice dogs. Sure, there was a risk of tripping over them, but none of my grandmother’s dogs were yappy or bit anyone. William famously has cocker spaniels from James, and I grew up with a lot of cocker spaniels, and sure they have more energy than corgis, but let’s not fool ourselves that William is walking the spaniels or even dealing with them attention farming. “William doesn’t like corgis”–what a weird flex.

  8. Lucy says:

    So now they’re just openly admitting she had bone cancer and was in a wheelchair in private? The things they hid or denied for years? These details are being revealed in a story about how Incandescent doesn’t like corgis or his p*do uncle? Ok.

  9. jferber says:

    2131Jan, He likes his mistresses, Jan, I’m sure. I do wonder why that puppy died after Andrew gifted it to his mother. It must have been very distressing to her. I started watching Lady on Britbox, about Sarah Ferguson’s dresser, who murdered her own boyfriend (not Sarah’s). Sarah is portrayed as likable and down-to-earth. The actress who plays Sarah may have been picked by Sarah herself, because she is doing so well in portraying Sarah in a sympathetic light. Anyway, it’s a fun watch (and a true story–not about Sarah’s niceness, though). I hope the two dogs are enjoying being buddies, even if they don’t have a human to love them.

  10. Mel says:

    I started watching Company Retreat. I feel so sorry for the non-actor, he’s surrounded by insanity and has NO CLUE what to do. It’s hilarious and cringe.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment