The Epstein survivors will stage protests of King Charles & Camilla today

Weeks ago, when King Charles and Queen Camilla’s state visit to the US was confirmed, they also quickly confirmed that Charles and Camilla would not meet with Jeffrey Epstein’s victims. Rep. Ro Khanna, who coauthored the Epstein Files Transparency Act, has been loudly critical of this choice, and Khanna has even given interviews to royal reporters, bashing Charles and Camilla’s decision to blank the survivors. Khanna even confirmed that he sent letters to the British embassy too, luckily Epstein associate Peter Mandelson is no longer the ambassador! In any case, Khanna was on Meet the Press on Sunday, once again making a vociferous argument, saying in part: “I am hopeful that King Charles, when he speaks to the Congress, will acknowledge the Epstein survivors, will call for justice, will call for investigations and prosecutions.” Charles will not. Camilla will not meet with the survivors either. So the survivors will demonstrate and protest the state visit today, including staging a gathering at the same time as tonight’s state dinner.

The shadow of Jeffrey Epstein will loom large over President Donald Trump’s royal night at the White House on Tuesday, with survivors planning to gather to protest King Charles III’s invitation. Epstein survivors said they plan to stage a high tea outside President Trump’s banquet with Charles and Queen Camilla, criticizing the royal couple for declining to meet with them.

“It feels like the monarchy is choosing distance over honesty,” said protest organizer Rina Oh about the royal couple ignoring the scandal during the U.S. visit despite Charles’ brother, former Prince Andrew, being arrested in February on charges stemming from an Epstein investigation.

Oh said the protest will take the form of a “performance art piece” aimed at capturing the king’s attention. But it could prove embarrassing for the king, given that he has repeatedly declined to meet with survivors despite their requests.

“Survivors want to be seen, acknowledged, and validated. We are asking for King Charles to meet with us for a few minutes and listen to what we have to say: We are living through this nightmare every day of our lives. This protest is about forcing the truth into the open, not politely asking for it,” Oh told The Daily Beast.

Oh was assaulted by Epstein when she was a 21-year-old art student in New York, and is a vocal critic of the handling of the scandal by Trump, 79, and the royal family.

The royal family has been mired in the controversy due to the behavior of King Charles’ younger brother Andrew and his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, who was described by Epstein as a “supreme friend.”

Andrew appears in a series of compromising photographs in the Epstein files, and was arrested on his birthday on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The investigation into his behavior is ongoing.

[From The Daily Beast]

Good. I’m glad there will be significant protests and demonstrations specifically around the Epstein issue. Charles and Camilla’s rationale for not meeting with the survivors is bullsh-t too – they both claim that they “can’t” meet the survivors because they don’t want to interfere with the ongoing investigations in the UK. Especially in Camilla’s case, this makes zero sense, given her long-standing work in domestic abuse, violence against women and sexual abuse. British peers are even bashing Camilla openly. It’s the kind of situation where if C&C wanted to meet the survivors, every royalist would be falling all over themselves to justify it and heap praise on them.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

13 Responses to “The Epstein survivors will stage protests of King Charles & Camilla today”

  1. Tessa says:

    Good for them staging the protest. I hope the news has full coverage of the protests!

  2. JayBlue says:

    Good on them, but I doubt chuck and camilla will care, if they even notice. They’ve gotten very used to ignoring hecklers recently!

  3. Brassy Rebel says:

    This same energy for Trump, please! He buries us in so much bull 🐂💩 that we can’t keep the focus on him, even though the evidence is strong that he was a major player in this sex trafficking ring.

  4. Clove says:

    I am sorry to say, but it is happening to the right people. Steve Schmidt said that they will be projecting on buildings everywhere they go.

    Dior is not helping Camilla. I still don’t like her for what she did to Diana and never will. She has a lot in common with Melania.

  5. jais says:

    And that’s what the people want to see. That’s what I’m f-cking talking about(insert Alysa Liu gif).

  6. IdlesAtCranky says:

    Honesty? From the “royals”?? Come now.

    There’s only one honest member of that family over the age of 12, and he lives in California now.

  7. aquarius64 says:

    Good. Stay on their necks Khanna.

  8. lisa says:

    I dont care what happens to either of them. but it doesnt really make a lot of sense to me when OUR OWN PRESIDENT is in the files and no one but Hillary has been questioned about the files. there are so many people we could be protesting, so many companies we could be boycotting etc. again, boycott Charles if you want, love that for him. but I dont get why he is the only one being protested unless im missing something.

  9. Irisrose says:

    Good. They need to revive the trump baby balloon, make new ones of epstein, melanoma, and Andrew. Fly those anywhere you can along with the yellow not my king/ no kings signs.

  10. Amy Bee says:

    As they should. I don’t understand why Charles and especially Camilla can’t meet with the survivors.

    • irisrose says:

      Legal reasons, because anything they do or say is a mine field and can be used against them legally? There is nothing they can say that improves the situation or justifies protective actions by QEII and Charles. Keeping quiet until if-and-when Andrew is charged and imprisoned may be the best (legal) option.

      Mette-Marit of Norway, who is neck deep in this, gave a 20 minute interview a few weeks ago. She was given the questions ahead of time and still managed to say nothing that clarified or showed remorse for her actions. She made it worse by refusing to take responsibility for her choices, complaining, and claiming she should have a right to an unquestioned personal life away from her royal role.

      • BeanieBean says:

        They could do a very bland, we sympathize, we empathize, we support survivors and hope for the best. They could easily sidestep any legal issues.

      • Irisrose says:

        Which is only saying what they’ve already said. No point doing that in person when that is all it would be. Performative and pointless.

        Nothing they say would be ‘easy’ to sidestep legally.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment