
If there is one mantra of these trying times, it’s that it is incumbent upon each one of us to take a stand against injustice. An undisclosed number of US citizens/coffee drinkers from three states have bandied together to do just that. They may not have known each other before, but the members of this new alliance all recently encountered the same wrong: they purchased Trader Joe’s French Roast Low Acid whole bean coffee, and there wasn’t enough caffeine!! “Low acid” refers to, duh, the acid level of the coffee, and low acid varieties can be gentler on the stomach. But it has absolutely nothing to do with the amount of caffeine, and since these particular bags of coffee weren’t labeled “decaf” or “half-caff,” obviously these disgruntled customers were left with no other option but to file a class-action lawsuit against Trader Joe’s and demand that they never ever ever sell this disappointing coffee again! Which the plaintiffs did last Thursday in California:
Several people have filed a lawsuit against Trader Joe’s, claiming that the retailer sold them coffee containing significantly less caffeine than expected.
The class-action lawsuit was filed in California on Thursday, April 23, according to court documents obtained by NBC News, CBS News and the New York Post.
The complaint, which was filed by customers in California, New York and Illinois, alleges that Trader Joe’s-branded French Roast Low Acid whole bean coffee contains half the caffeine of typical coffee blends, according to the outlets.
However, the complaint states that there is nothing on the product’s label that indicates a customer is purchasing a coffee blend with reduced caffeine, per the outlets.
“For example, full caffeinated coffee does not have any special labeling denoting that it is fully caffeinated, but ‘decaf’ and ‘half-caff’ coffees are labeled as such. Here, the product does not disclose that it is ‘decaf’ and ‘half-caff’ coffee,” the complaint states, per NBC News.
The customers are now seeking damages from the company, claiming that many people rely on caffeine to function effectively.
“It is so common that it is now cliché that coffee drinkers depend on the caffeine contained therein to provide them with the energy they need to get through the day. Accordingly, the amount of caffeine in a coffee blend affects a consumer’s purchasing decision,” the complaint states, per CBS News.
The plaintiffs are additionally requesting that Trader Joe’s stop selling the product, which they say contains misleading marketing, according to the outlet.
According to NBC News’ reporting, the plaintiffs base their claim — that the Trader Joe’s coffee only has half the caffeine as usual — on tests conducted by “competitors” of TJ’s. Apparently, those tests found the French Roast Low Acid coffee had 51% of the caffeine as the Dark French Roast and 45% of caffeine as the House Blend (all TJ’s varieties). But again, these are the purported results of tests run by a competitor, so should be taken with a grain of Splenda. It’s true that the packaging of the contested coffee doesn’t include a detailed list of ingredients, only “100% Arabica Whole Bean Coffee” and the broad description of “Dark Roast, Smooth & Full Flavored.” That could work for the plaintiffs with their claim of improper/inadequate labeling.
Still, that’s money for research on top of the money for lawyers, all over a $7.99 bag of coffee. Call me crazy, but I have to ask: WHY NOT JUST BUY DIFFERENT COFFEE?? For something under $10, I would chalk it up as a learning experience and move on to a different brand or blend. Never in a million years would my reaction be, “I must sue!” Is this my failing — am I not blaming other people enough for my own choices? Sourcing tests and hiring lawyers is an awfully robust (coffee pun!) response. And to say TJ’s should cancel the product entirely? At the very least, just let them fix the label! What am I missing? Probably a full helping of caffeine.
Photos credit: Helena Lopes on Pexels, Alvin David and Marques Thomas on Unsplash












Yeah, that’s wild. I’m thinking it was an attorney who was experiencing caffeine withdrawals. I wonder if I’d notice…I’d probably just drink four cups instead of two.
Do something that matters more. Ridiculous.
Ummm…need more coffee to understand this…
Talk about nuisance lawsuits clogging the courts…. And just how have they been “damaged” enough to merit a lawsuit? I love Trader Joe’s by the way.
So it’s really important that every manufacturer be held accountable for correct labeling. This might seem really petty but it’s not about the coffee, it’s about being dishonest about the contents of a food product. This coffee probably won’t hurt anyone, but what if the next label they fuck up is about an allergen? Dismissing this as a frivolous lawsuit is the kind of PR that works in favor of every single massive conglomerate who would happily cut corners in labeling if they could get away with it. And then people will get hurt.
And a reminder, the McDonalds coffee lawsuit was not frivolous, they were repeatedly warned about the temperature and the woman had to get skin grafts.
Agreed. If the product had twice or even three times the amount of caffeine and wasn’t labelled accordingly, we might have deaths leading to this lawsuit. I love TJs, but everyone needs to be held accountable.
Moral of the story is never mess with a coffee drinker’s caffeine…