Prince Andrew is having ‘a very nice time’ in Norfolk & he has an active social life

Surprise, Prince Andrew is having a great time. He’s not living in disgrace, ignored and lonely in some Norfolk shack. He’s living in a completely refurbished cottage on the Sandringham estate, and he’s got private security and a full household staff, all of which is paid for by his brother. King Charles is also giving Andrew £1 million a year as a “stipend.” It turns out that when Andrew finally agreed to leave Royal Lodge earlier this year, it was only because Charles finally agreed to quietly buy him out of his lease too. So, Andrew has millions in the bank, his entire lavish lifestyle is being financed by the king, and Andrew is still welcome in elite circles too. All of this is the focus of a new Times piece, which Tom Sykes discussed on his Substack:

The former Prince Andrew is having “a very nice time” in Norfolk, where he is hanging out with “chums,” visiting friends, shooting and generally enjoying the delights of an Edwardian gentleman’s social life, all of it funded by a generous £1 million-plus per annum allowance from the King’s own pocket, although his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, ak “the red setter”, has fallen out of favor and has been banned from visiting him, according to a rash of reports in British newspapers Wednesday morning.

The portrait of Andrew’s Norfolk idyll comes from Kate Mansey, assistant editor of The Times. For months, she writes, the speculation was that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was idling away his days in misery in front of the television and flight tracking apps, having been ordered out of palatial Royal Lodge and into the far more modest Marsh Farm on the Sandringham estate. But now, those familiar with his lifestyle say it is much jollier than that. “He’s having a very nice time, thank you very much,” one well-placed source tells her. He goes out. He goes shooting with friends. The “old guard,” as the paper has it, has rallied round and is very loyal to him. He is, we learn, no longer sitting around feeling sorry for himself.

There are no travel restrictions on him while he remains under police investigation, Mansey reports, but those who know him say he has not been abroad, nor taken up the hospitality previously offered by wealthy foreign friends. Why would he? Norfolk is lovely at this time of year.

The one person not invited is Sarah Ferguson, who went on living with Andrew long after their divorce in 1996 and has now returned to the UK, where she is keeping a low profile. A source tells The Times that “the red setter,” as she is apparently known, is persona non grata at Marsh Farm. What she has done to be exiled from the exile is unclear, although the paper notes that documents released in the US appear to show it was Ferguson who introduced Andrew to Jeffrey Epstein.

All of which has prompted a good deal of renewed interest in a simple question: how is Andrew funding his life? The answer was casually dropped into a story in The Times this week, almost as an afterthought. Andrew is “understood” (code for “the press office told us”) to be receiving in excess of £1 million a year from the King’s private funds, enough to pay for round-the-clock security, a valet, a chef and whatever else he wants in his personal life. He does not have to seek the King’s approval for how he spends it. Mansey’s piece today describes a generous ongoing stipend covering his security detail, his other staff and however he chooses to fill his considerable leisure hours. Bear in mind that, as a gift from one royal brother to another, this is probably tax-free. And bear in mind the wording: in excess of. A million pounds is the floor, not the ceiling. For all we know, it could be two.

There is, we are told, precisely one string attached. Andrew may spend the allowance as he chooses, The Times reports, provided it is not on his latest legal battle. But predictably there is no way of enforcing this one modest condition, what with money being fungible and all.

[From The Royalist Substack]

I’ve always believed that Andrew has lived like this? I never bought the storyline that he was depressed or licking his wounds or that he ever felt like he was living in disgrace. It was clear as soon as he moved to Norfolk that Andrew and King Charles had come to a gentlemen’s agreement about who pays for what and how much. The palace has pushed the storyline, this whole time, that Andrew is embattled or distraught and it was always a PR fiction to justify Charles handling Andrew gently and generously. And as always, compare this with how Charles treats his younger son.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Backgrid, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

17 Responses to “Prince Andrew is having ‘a very nice time’ in Norfolk & he has an active social life”

  1. YankeeDoodles says:

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: between Charles, Andrew, and William, now, it’s going, going, gone.

  2. JFerber says:

    And the church men who dumped on Meghan have NOTHING to say about Andrew? Yay for the Sussex squad in England. I’d like to join them, but I’d never go to that wretched country or go on Elon Musk’s X. So I’ll just go e them a random smile and maybe wave. Good job!

  3. Jais says:

    JFC. And I don’t believe his security, paid for by Charles, can’t carry guns or doesn’t get special intel, just f-cking saying.

  4. JFerber says:

    Sorry, give them a random smile and maybe a wave. Jais, you’re right!! I’m sure of it. Only Harry’s security can’t have guns. And I bet they’d check to make sure they didn’t have them and fine or jail them if they did!

  5. QuiteContrary says:

    King Charles keeps showing people who he is: a disgusting human being, happy to finance the comfort of his predatory and depraved younger brother, so long as that brother keeps a lid on Charles’ secrets.

    People outside of this site should be asking why Charles is so eager to keep Pedrew happy.

    And how gross that Pedrew’s “old guard” continues to yuk it up with him. He should be in prison. And his pals should be named and shamed. Instead of stalking H&M at a pub, the rota should be photographing the people hanging out with Pedrew.

  6. Lorelei says:

    What a heartwarming story 🙄

  7. Ciotog says:

    Allow me to adjust my tinfoil tiara as I say that the palace put it out that Andrew was “distraught” so they could bump him off less suspiciously if he actually tried to say what he knows about the RF and their enablers.

  8. BeanieBean says:

    Oh, wow, OK, several things:
    – what’s the deal with nicknames? Haven’t y’all in Britain grown out of that? In my personal experience, that kind of thing stopped in grade school; it doesn’t happen in my friend group & it never happened in any workplace. Weird, childish, ridiculous. (Sarah is the ‘red setter’, said twice!)
    – this: ‘Andrew is “understood” (code for “the press office told us”)….’ That’s an interesting ‘tell’! Somebody finally put that in writing!
    – and this: ‘as a gift from one royal brother to another, this is probably tax-free.’ Monetary gifts are tax-free in Britain? In the US, only gifts up to $19k are tax-free, and it’s the giver who pays, not the recipient; I’m guessing this is because Charles is king yada, yada, yada.

  9. Susie W says:

    Just to add some extra context to this, the modest new abode has five bedrooms, so hardly slumming it is ‘our’ Andrew. He got in new carpets from the royal-endorsed Linney Cooper so we are not talking a trip down to B&Q for his refurb. And yes the pocket money from his brother STARTS at one million. His resurrection will continue as long as Brits suck up to these lazy lying tribe and continue to grovel in thanks.

  10. Penelope Cowell Doe says:

    This makes me sick

  11. bisynaptic says:

    Right: he’s living the good life, while Sarah has been outcast. He sold state secrets and she… did not.
    Andrew’s case should highlight how little loyalty the elite of every society feel towards their country.

  12. bisynaptic says:

    “Bear in mind that, as a gift from one royal brother to another, this is probably tax-free.“
    — Come again? I thought the tax-free deal was strictly monarch to monarch, which is why Charles got everything from Elizabeth, in the first place.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment