The Met Police will reduce their protection for Trooping the Colour’s sparse crowds

Since Queen Elizabeth II’s 2022 death, all of the Windsors’ big, signature events have seen decreased attendance, empty barricades and increasingly large anti-monarchy demonstrations. In June, this year’s Trooping the Colour featured such sparse crowds, most British outlets refused to publish wide-shot photos. The Windsors can’t announce their public events ahead of time because Republic will bring out their inflatable dinosaur and their bullhorns. So, here’s the latest indignity for the Windsors and for King Charles’ sausage-fingered reign: the Metropolitan Police will reduce their presence at future Trooping parades.

The Metropolitan Police is to reduce protection for Trooping the Colour, The Telegraph can reveal. The force has “cut the vast majority” of officers it provides to police the King’s birthday parade, as well as other ceremonial events including gun salutes and Changing of the Guard.

Instead, the Met will provide “minimal” protection, with far fewer police on the ground at events. The bulk of the responsibility will instead be contracted to a private company, The Telegraph understands.

The cuts, due to take place next month, were the result of budget cuts and increased demand for officers to cover front-line policing, the Met said. Police sources insisted the Met would continue to support the military on “nationally significant events”. It is understood the Met will provide support based on “where the threat, harm and risk assessments justify it”.

However, a defence source told The Telegraph: “They are not supporting Trooping the Colour in the same way, nor many other events.”

It was stressed that having a police presence was “vital” to ensuring ceremonial events run safely and that any deployment of police officers was an independent operational decision. An Army source said the decision would cause concern because a private company could not “provide the same level of assurance to the soldiers and the public about safety in the face of any potential security risk”.

[From The Telegraph]

Granted, this move is about more than just the sparse crowds and the declining interest in the Windsors. But I guarantee that if the monarchy was in good shape and those people were still genuinely popular (as opposed to merely tolerated and propped up by emotional-support polls), the Met Police would have a significant presence at all of these big events. Outsourcing security to private companies for these kinds of events shows that the Met Police aren’t actually worried about large-scale threats to the crown anymore. It’s an acknowledgement that police providing security at Trooping is basically just setting up empty barricades, controlling an already sparse crowd and trying to help the Windsors save face from the increasingly loud anti-monarchy demonstrations.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, Cover Images.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

14 Responses to “The Met Police will reduce their protection for Trooping the Colour’s sparse crowds”

  1. QuiteContrary says:

    LOL.

    The reality is that monarchists are getting too old to stand on The Mall, clapping for these losers. Younger people are far less interested.

    • StillDouchesOfCambridge says:

      The young recognize that these twats are just regular folks, who think they are better and worth more than they really do. It’s getting cancelled just like the commonwealth tv presentation and Kate’s snooze Xmas show

    • StarryOwl says:

      I had a surprised and delighted laugh at seeing that dinosaur. I thought they were kidding! Nope! There it is, in all its extinct and rexy glory. Love it so much 😂

  2. Mayp says:

    “An Army source said the decision would cause concern because a private company could not “provide the same level of assurance to the soldiers and the public about safety in the face of any potential security risk””.

    Tell that to RAVEC.

    • apostrophe says:

      First thing I noted, too.

      • StarryOwl says:

        Thought the exact same thing 😂 but then wondered if this was going to be used against the Sussexes. “Trooping has private security! So what’s your problem?!?”
        How about a severe threat level that is continuously fed by the BRF and the media of the entire nation/ commonwealth against a veteran and his family? Oh and they are also royal.

  3. Christina says:

    They could invite Harry, Meghan, Doria, Archie and Lili if they want to increase attendance. Wink-wink.

  4. ShazBot says:

    Outsourcing to private security means invoices for specific events – I’ll bet Republic is salivating at the prospect of FOIing that info.

  5. Roan Inish says:

    Make the Royals pay for it! They are already over funded by the people.

  6. sunnyside up says:

    The balcony was better when they had all the families and children there as well. All the empty spaces are a mistake.

    • StarryOwl says:

      The balcony used to look like an American family mid Thanksgiving dinner. Kids being silly. One three year old being absolutely done with all of it. Older cousins who had taken “a walk” and now are trying desperately not to make eye contact with each other because they will start to giggle. Older relatives holding random toddlers or babies. Some of the balcony attendees looked like they had just set down a plate of food and been shoved out the door. The queen being like – don’t you climb on that railing! We are very much not a Darwin awards family.

      Because they looked like an actual family. For once. A full family of people who knew each other and some of whom even liked each other. Now they look like a skeleton crew where everyone is miserable and hate each other.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment