Megan Fox’s new Armani underwear ad: trashy or pretty?

meganfox

Or both? Because my vote is “trashy and pretty.” I like her hair, and she doesn’t look corpsey and vacant in this photo, like she usually does when she’s “modeling.” But, Megan is inherently trashy (to me). And the totally cheap-looking Marilyn tattoo doesn’t help. In Megan’s previous Armani ads, they seemed to take pains not to show off that one tattoo. Anyway, I don’t think they Photoshopped her body much – maybe they took off some of her other tattoos? Otherwise, I’ll buy that she really looks like that.

Megan Fox strips down to a lacy bra and panties for her latest Emporio Armani ads.

The newly-engaged actress’ billboards will roll out in New York, L.A., London, Milan, Rome and Tokyo beginning this July. She’ll appear in commercials this September.

Fox, 24 — who recently announced she won’t appear in Transformers 3 — next stars in Jonah Hex, out this Friday.

The new issue of Us Weekly reports that on-again beau Brian Austin Green popped the question — again! — in Hawaii June. 1. “Yes, she is engaged,” her rep tells Us.

But in all the excitement, the happy couple somehow lost the ring, sources tell Us.

“I saw her jumping up and down,” a witness says of the beachside proposal at the Four Seasons Hualalai hotel on the Big Island in Hawaii. “Later, I saw a half dozen staff sifting through the sand.”

The 2-carat bauble is still missing.

“Security and maintenance staff spent a couple of hours looking for it,” another source tells Us Weekly. “No one found it.”

[From Us Weekly]

I keep forgetting that Megan has a movie to promote – that Jonah Hex crap. If she was promoting a Transformers film, she would be on the cover of every magazine, saying dumb sh-t in every interview. But for this promotional trail, she hasn’t been too in-our-faces. Interesting move by her PR people.

Here’s an older Armani ad with Megan – see how they made her twist to avoid showing that tattoo?

fox22

Ad courtesy of Fox News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

46 Responses to “Megan Fox’s new Armani underwear ad: trashy or pretty?”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. jc126 says:

    That tattoo is hideous. Doesn’t Lindsay Lohan have a Marilyn tattoo as well?
    Putting MM on one’s body is a mistake. It’s supposed to be a tribute to their idol, but all it does is make other people think “Gee, MM was ten times more beautiful than Megan Fox/Lindsay Lohan/whoever.”

  2. nnn says:

    Those are better than the first ones she did for Armani.

    But the tatoo is too much. They should have covered it

  3. lucy2 says:

    That tattoo does always look trashy. Even when she’s all cleaned up and dressed nicely, you can always see it and it’s so big and distracting.

  4. a says:

    tattoos are ok… just good ones.

  5. bellaluna says:

    She’s always trashy. And what is up with her belly button?

    Is anyone else having problems with Celebitchy loading monstrously slow today? Every story I click on takes forever to load; comments too.

  6. LOVE ANGELINA says:

    Her body looks great, they probably should have covered the tat, marketing wise its distracting from the underwear imo. It just doesn’t look right, I mean women can have tats and really blend them in well with what they are modeling but it doesn’t work with that tat. Megan is also lacking expression in the face. Its nothing. Just a girl in panties and bra.

  7. Meimei says:

    I think Photoshop was her friend here. If I remember correctly (not going to check), she looked downright scrawny in those recent bikini pics, but here she’s just very slender.

    Overall, these look quite good, but I can’t get over the fact this is Miss Foot-in-mouth we’re talking about.

  8. Joe says:

    Underwear is hot…Marilyn tattoo is despicably tacky and horribly bad art.

  9. Trillion says:

    She had a very skilled boob-job engineer. (I can’t bring myself to call them “doctors”).
    She looks really amazing here in both pics, I think.

  10. Anna says:

    They definitely got rid of some of her tats, like the one she has on her ribs. But what I don’t understand is why they got rid of that ink and left the hideous MM tattoo, which is trashier and uglier than all her other tats combined.

  11. guesty says:

    she reminds me of lindsay for some reason in the most recent pic. like the first pic better.

  12. Donna Wingfield says:

    These are good pictures. She usually looks in need of a bath.

  13. Tia C says:

    “But, Megan is inherently trashy (to me). And the totally cheap-looking Marilyn tattoo doesn’t help.”

    Couldn’t agree more!! Point made my jc126 is also spot on – by putting that MM tattoo on their body, they (Megan Fox, Lilo) are only bringing attention to the fact that she was 10x the woman they’ll ever be.

  14. denise says:

    Pretty.

  15. Alarmjaguar says:

    I just find the tattoo too distracting. It is so big. If it were an abstract pattern or something it might not be so annoying.

  16. jover says:

    I have no respect for the once respectable Armani that he must choose this trashy bimbo over all the beautiful Italian/other actresses and models. It is well known that Megafarse’s pr ppl spent a yr courting Armani to get this gig. How much is Megaplastic Farse getting paid. Don’t these designers have any class anymore that they choose dopey trashheads to market their products? She is not attractive; she is wholly plastic and empty enuff said.

  17. Ron says:

    i don’t see anything remotely trashy about these pics. Like Armani is going to use trashy shots.

  18. The Truth Fairy says:

    Why would anyone think this is trashy???

  19. stephiespoons says:

    I’m all for tattoos, but getting someone’s face inked on your body is just plain creepy. I will admit that there are exceptions to the rule, like if you actually knew the person and they meant a lot to you.

  20. Biberon says:

    I kinda like the Tat… I’m all for personal expression… nice undies too!

  21. Toe says:

    She looks good in these pictures. She liked MM that is why she has it. To each his own.

  22. Laura says:

    She makes me question my sexuality.

  23. Solveig says:

    Pretty, but THAT tattoo is hideous.

  24. crazydaisy says:

    she’s a beautiful young woman. anyone who has a problem with these photos is just plain jealous! where’s the story?

  25. Kelbear says:

    I think she looks better than normal. I like her hair here, it isn’t her normal flat, greasy look.

  26. LondonLady says:

    so if you are chronically underweight you can just about squeeze into armani underwear. I pass

  27. Feebee says:

    They can photoshop the SATC cast’s faces into oblivion but they couldn’t photoshop out the MM tattoo? It’s the only thing that cheapens that photo. Otherwise she looks pretty good, like clean and stuff.

  28. Miss Thang says:

    Pretty.

  29. frozen says:

    she looks great its pretty and the tat is ok

  30. Laura says:

    I can’t believe folks are looking at these pictures and all they can see it the tattoo… I mean, there’s more to look at people!

  31. Ellen Smith says:

    Armani and tattoos? Ruins the brand’s image.

  32. RHONYC says:

    @ bellaluna:
    —————————-

    thank you! i thought is was just me.

    her whole middle section is skeevie to me and i can’t put my finger on it.

    she’s got something lohan-ish about her.

    ew.

  33. original kate says:

    she is so vacant.

  34. Gaby says:

    Pretty. The black and white helps a lot because her face looks more natural than usual, she wears a lot of makeup.

  35. Camille says:

    Her body looks weird, like they stretched out her torso. Not hot and yeah trashy. Oh, but her hair does look nice.

  36. ligeia says:

    airbrushed within an inch of her life! she had some killer abs in recent bikini pix of her that were floating around. she also looked quite a bit thinner. i guess abs aren’t in, only starving yourself and not exercising, ladies!
    oh and her tits don’t look fake here *shrugs* maybe she took them out or got rid of stuffed push up bra.

  37. Kim says:

    Its that damn hideous tattoo of Marilyn that makes her look trashy. To bad – she is pretty and the ad would be pretty and classy all but for that bad tattoo. Armani obviously agreed since in last photo she is striking a very odd pose all to have her inner arm face inward and that tattoo not show. Why didn they just airbrush it out of all the photos?

  38. Ruffian9 says:

    Pretty, but yeah, vacant. I also don’t ‘get’ the Marilyn tattoo; What are you trying to say about yourself by getting it? Am I missing something?

  39. Pia says:

    This is probably the least trashy she has ever looked. Not saying much, I know.

  40. Isa says:

    I don’t like the Marylin tattoo either. Her other ones don’t bother me but that one isn’t attractive.
    But I think that she does look very pretty in these pictures.
    I don’t think she’s trashy, it’s just that her comments ruin the public’s perception of her. Including myself, I think she’s pretty but dumb and annoying as a box of rocks

  41. Amy says:

    Her face looks more natural in this picture and more alive. In all other pictures I’ve seen her in, she has that same come hither look that makes her look vacant and vapid.

  42. Di says:

    Men used to say that women who wore pants looked “trashy”.

    Come on, people. So much woman on woman hate. If a woman has a tattoo, why do you care so much?

  43. NicoleAM says:

    Damn that tattoo! Pics are otherwise hot. Not a big fan, but hard to deny the Fox is seriously good looking. It’s obvious from past pics she’s had work done, but she seriously found the best plastic surgeon in the world.
    So, yea I like the pics.

  44. Sally says:

    I like her rib tattoo, but hate the Marilyn one. And what *is* up with her mid-section? Looks icky. Good boob job, though!

  45. autotron says:

    Oh yeah, tattoos are totally equal to the phenomenon of women wearing slacks. People think tattoos look trashy simply because they make you look stupid (i.e.: someone who makes poooooor choices), especially if they are poorly done/chosen. This is not exclusive to women, however it is voiced more against women simply because people are always sad to see a pretty girl ruin her dainty looks with such a permanent, ugly black smear – doesn’t matter if this was the aim of the girl, but people will always look at it and think, “oh i never would have done THAT.” You cannot compare this to women wearing pants, or any other style changes. Stop being the wolf who called misogyny, are else men will never take the plight of women on this earth seriously.

  46. Thatguy says:

    Why does everyone say Marily Monroe was so beautiful? Do I really need to remind how freaking SKANKY and sketch Monroe was back then? She probably spread as much syphilis as Madonna spread chlamydia.