Thomas Markle’s granddaughter Noelle isn’t surprised by the revelations

The main story is always going to be that Thomas Markle abused children, full stop. But the news about Thomas Markle’s depravity has exposed so much of the despicably twisted machinations of the British press and the industry around hating the Duchess of Sussex. The British media constantly platformed Thomas Markle and Samantha Markle in print and on television. They ran Thomas and Samantha’s unhinged rantings and nonsensical statements without fact-checking or context. And now that Thomas has been exposed as a predator, suddenly outlets are doing interviews with other members of the Markle family. Take, for example, Samantha’s children. We learned via Netflix’s Harry & Meghan that Meghan is close to her niece Ashleigh Hale, and that Hale was raised by her father’s parents, not her mother Samantha. And now Samantha’s other daughter Noelle Rasmussen is speaking out, and it turns out that Samantha abused her and that Roslyn Loveless was the one who called the cops on Samantha. Noelle spoke to the Telegraph about her family’s dysfunctions and crimes:

Noelle can’t believe her grandmother’s letter wasn’t passed along to the relevant authorities: For Ms Rasmussen, one of the most troubling aspects of the case is the suggestion that her grandmother’s warning to the Metropolitan Police was ignored. Scotland Yard admitted they failed to pass the letter to the FBI or foreign police forces for investigation, although they did tell the Duchess of Sussex about the accusations. “It blows my mind [that it wasn’t passed over to the FBI],” Ms Rasmussen says. “That is a failure on the police’s part…that is such a failure of the system. It’s embarrassing.”

Noelle barely saw Thomas: Growing up, Ms Rasmussen rarely saw her grandfather, assuming it was simply because he lived so far away. Her grandmother made no secret of her dislike for him, frequently referring to him in decidedly unflattering terms as “that f—— a——”, she recalls with a smile. At the time, Ms Rasmussen did not understand the depth of her grandmother’s hostility. Now, she finds herself re-examining those childhood memories. “I remember her writing the letter,” she says. With hindsight, it would “make a puzzle piece kind of fit”, into the story of her own childhood. “She had guts that I’ve never seen before, and she did not care what would come to her. She would just do whatever she felt was right, and she was incredible.”

Loveless also protected Samantha’s children: When Ms Rasmussen was 16, Loveless wrote to the police and Child Protective Services demanding that she be removed from the care of her daughter. Ms Rasmussen claims that her mother, Samantha Markle, was emotionally and physically abusive. It is a period she remembers as “hell”. “[My grandmother] always knew who to go to. The police got involved, my dad came and picked me up, and I went for the weekend. I didn’t go back,” she says.

Noelle on Roslyn Loveless: Samantha Markle, 61, has defended her father, suggesting her mother’s accusations were born out of “hatred and bitterness”. She has also questioned Loveless’s credibility, describing her as an alcoholic. Ms Rasmussen strongly rejects this characterisation of her grandmother. “Roslyn liked her drinks. We all like our drinks. Who doesn’t like a drink?” she says. “But she was extremely coherent. She was very well spoken. If she put something in a letter, it’s more than likely what she had seen to be the truth or what she had experienced. It was something that she either saw or heard or believed to be 100 per cent true…. She just spoke the truth, no matter how ugly it was, and if she thought something was ugly, she would absolutely make a scene of it.”

She’s glad that she wasn’t abused by Thomas Markle: Ms Rasmussen has also had to come to terms with the difficult realisation that she cannot rule out the possibility that her grandfather attacked members of her family. She says she was never abused by Mr Markle, herself. “I’m glad that I had never been victimised or had the chance to be victimised,” she says. “I don’t think he would attack family, but when you do not know what somebody’s capable of, you can’t assume.” Nor, she says, was news of his alleged child abuse a revelation. “It doesn’t surprise me,” she says. “The more and more I think about it, it just doesn’t… I don’t know why it’s not a surprise.”

She subconsciously knew that something was wrong with Thomas: “It might have been something I just didn’t register at the time, or subconsciously put any thought behind. Even as a child, it may have just been something that I registered that I didn’t know [I had].” She ultimately believes that her grandmother must have protected her from her grandfather. “She loved to protect people, and if she loved you, she would go to the ends of the earth to protect you. And so that was more than likely,” she says.

Noelle on Meghan: Although Ms Rasmussen has not spoken to Meghan for years, she supports her aunt’s decision to keep her children away from their grandfather, saying she would make the same choice herself. “I support her decision to prevent her kids from seeing him. I wouldn’t want my kids around somebody who was being accused of child molestation,” she says. She adds that she “100 per cent backs” the Duchess’s decision to keep Archie and Lilibet away from him.

[From The Telegraph]

It’s more than possible that Noelle and Ashleigh never agreed to interviews circa 2016-2020 and so that’s why Thomas and Samantha were able to set their unhinged narratives about Meghan. But it’s also possible that the British media was so obsessed with pushing every hateful narrative on Meghan that the media went out of their way to avoid looking too hard at Samantha and Thomas. There’s a significant vetting issue here – Samantha and Thomas never had any credibility, and instead of framing it that way, the media just platformed them and (even worse) used them as puppets to funnel their racist rage at Meghan. The media got into bed with those two lunatics and prayed that Thomas and Samantha’s real stories would never come out.

Photos courtesy of Avalon Red, screencap courtesy of GB News.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

29 Responses to “Thomas Markle’s granddaughter Noelle isn’t surprised by the revelations”

  1. Brassy Rebel says:

    Maybe they never vetted them. Unlikely, since large platforms want to avoid lawsuits. More likely, they did vet them, knew they were trash and just ran with this unhinged campaign to weaponize them against Meghan. And the palaces were totally in on this plan.

    • ecsmom says:

      I remember when they were first interviewing them and knowing that Samantha did not have custody of her own children. So the Daily Mail had to have known yet used them for their narrative. And to be honest if you told me they were blackmailing Tom Sr for awful stories I would believe it. They knew a lot and chose dine with the devil.

    • DouchesOfCambridge says:

      This is Samantha and the brother having no more choice but to get this story out because they need money and are trying any way possible to weaponize anything they got. This what they think is their last opportunity and they’re going all-in and rogue because the RF is not going with it – how could they with pdfile Andrew? She lost her defamation case and is looking for a new scheme

  2. Tessa says:

    Tom rarely saw the older grandchildren but only complained about nor seeing the youngest two. What did he expect when he constantly complained about the sussexes on his TV appearances.

  3. Amy Bee says:

    The press ignored the fact that Toxic Tom had no relationship with his other grandchildren but pushed the narrative that Meghan must take her children to see her grandfather. They never questioned why he didn’t have a relationship with his other grandchildren. The press has a lot to answer for.

  4. JayBlue says:

    It’s outrageous but unsurprising the amount of cherry picking the British media have done regarding information and reports on Thomas markle. They used him as long as it agreed with their narrative that meghan is the antichrist here to destroy the royal family, while ignoring EVERYTHING else.

    Shame on them, and good on noelle for saying her piece and defending her grandmother. Knowing the amount of blowback she’ll get for it, that took guts!

  5. bisynaptic says:

    Does Junior also have kids who can bust his reputation?

  6. SIde Eye says:

    As everyone has pointed out here, the first giant red flag was Samantha did not have custody of her own children. Samantha’s daughter graduated law school and Meghan attended the graduation but not Samantha. The BM never considered maybe part of the vitriol Samantha directed at Meghan was rooted in the fact that her own daughter could not stomach her but seems very fond of Meghan. The rest of course, is rooted in racism, jealousy, hatred.

    The other red flag, Thomas Sr. has no contact with the other grandkids, but is only obsessed with seeing 2 – Meghan and Harry’s kids.

    I am loving this comeuppance for the British Media. They wanted to push their toxic, racist narrative and used Thomas and Samantha to do it. They knew exactly who they were and got in bed with them anyway.

    And I know this sounds terrible but I am so glad the horrible people in this family are not Black. Just imagine the sh*tshow and the narrative if these these awful people weren’t White.

    • Ciotog says:

      Samantha Markle is clearly a terrible person, but I have to wonder if she was victimized as a child, by her father, and that’s part of what’s fueling her craziness, including her hatred of Meghan.

    • Flower says:

      Just to correct something here because I notice that people keep referring to the fact that Samantha did not have custody of all three of her children as opposed to the fact that the familial relationship was actually legally severed.

      So, it would actually be more accurate to say that legally Samantha potentially only has one child i.e. Noelle. Her first two children were taken away from her as toddlers, so that indicates how badly the court perceived Samantha’s ability to care for her children. Their adoption by their grandchildren was then expedited by the grandparents with the permission of the court so Samantha had not had contact with Ashley since she was 2 years old.

      When Ashley reached 18 years old, she sought out her mother and it was then that Meghan also began a relationship with Ashley. The words used by the family in one interview was that Sam had ‘found’ her children.

      A few years later Meghan met Harry and it was the way that Sam spoke about Meghan and Harry that made Ashleigh step away from her bio mother again. You will notice in the Meghan & Harry documentaries that Ashley never refers to Sam as her mother, because she isn’t.

      I think that is a detail that is often missed and its very infuriating. Notice also that Sam never mentions Ashley because she doesn’t really know her.

      In regards to Noelle, it’s not clear whether Sam is still legally her mother. However there was an interview a few years back where Noelle’s father massively discredits Sam as essentially a liar and a Charlatan and its clear that the Courts removed Noelle from her care for a number of reasons incl physical abuse. She was then placed under the care of Sam’s mother.

  7. aquarius64 says:

    Scammy’s absive history with Noelle was revealed in a 2018 article, in the Fail no less. The BM and the rota acting brand new about Meghan’s paternal family’s trailer trashiness is ridiculous. They are afraid the Phillipines, a non Commonwealth country, is loooking into Toxic Tom’s allegations of child molestation with an assist from the FBI. If Bad Dad goes to the dock, he might squeal to get a deal. If he catches a charge in the US the interviews he has done over the years are admissible in court and can be used against him. The one article that is damaging is a statement he made he likes going to Asia because he can be with 12 year old girls. Not a good look when the age of consent in Thailand in 15 and the age of consent in the Phillipines is 16. Time to lawyer up Bad Dad.

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      The BM, the Fail at least, KNEW what Bad Dad was and kept their mouths shut about it – I would LOVE it if the FBI and Philippine authorities went after Caroline Graham (you know she and the Fail are worried about them being on the hook).

      If it comes to it the Fail will throw Thomas (and Scammy) under the bus, repeatedly, to protect themselves. I can also see Thomas and Scammy trying to throw the Fail under the bus to divert away from themselves – this could get VERY messy for that lot.

  8. Mightymolly says:

    Guys, why is Samantha such a disturbed abusive human? It sounds like her mother was a decent person. How much tine did she spend with her father?

    • Digital Unicorn says:

      From what I can recall of what was said of her, Scammy has displayed this kind of disturbing behaviour from childhood which could be the result of many things – there were stories of how she would destroy rooms/possessions if she didn’t what she wanted (I recall reading how she destroyed her brothers room when they moved to a new house because she decided she wanted it or something like that).

      • Mightymolly says:

        It’s not a great sign. I suspect he was very abusive to her in other ways. For example, I wonder if he constantly compared her unfavorably to other little girls. She is absolutely desperate for his approval.

  9. Blujfly says:

    Noelle was in the room while Roslyn was interviewed by the Mirror back in 17/18 and quoted in at least some of it. Some of it is actually in the archives here. Go to the end of the Meghan Markle tag and go ahead a few pages. Worth a revisit in light of all this.

    • Mightymolly says:

      Gosh Noelle is stunning. She seems to have a very private life though. Very little info online. I hope she’s thriving.

      • Flower says:

        I feel so bad for Noelle because she has essentially been left with no family in all of this. I hope that she has plenty of good chosen family.

  10. Lady Digby says:

    Feminegra is concise about how reporter C Graham has serious ethical questions regarding her cultivation and then exploitation of T Markle: as paid interview subject for exclusive content on Meghan Sussex and close personal friend and father figure and confidante of dementia sufferer. Fair enough TMarkle is greedy, corrupt, vindictive and needing to punish Meghan for justifiably cutting him out of her life so he enthusiastically collaborated but reporter Graham should be held accountable against Editors code .

    Feminegra states in 2021, Meghan successfully sued The Mail on Sunday’s publisher, Associated Newspapers, for copyright infringement and misuse of private information after Thomas supplied Graham with Meghan’s private letter, which the newspaper subsequently published in substantial extracts.

    The Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics outlines four principles: Seek Truth and Report It, Minimize Harm, Act Independently, and Be Accountable and Transparent.

    Graham’s conduct deserves examination against those standards. There is also the question of Thomas’s reported dementia diagnosis. While dementia does not automatically remove someone’s capacity to consent, interviewing a vulnerable individual requires particular care, especially when discussing serious criminal allegations and complicated family relationships.
    Sky News Reporter Challenges Thomas Markle’s Filipino Nurse Romance, Putting Caroline Graham’s Daily Mail Exclusive Under Scrutiny – Feminegra https://share.google/tzKhFH1WhQsno4gHL

  11. NoBS Please says:

    The British media rushed to platform the Markles that were willing to spend their lives heaping trash on Meghan – Paedo-Tom Sr, Likely Paedo-Tom Jr, Nutjob Scammy.

    Anyone paying attention would have known that this wasn’t a smart strategy, as the shameful issues with these three are a big as a mountain and impossible to avoid: paedo abuse, child abuse, lost custody of children, adult children who are nc with them, bankruptcy and financial mismanagement, money-grabbing, generally crass behaviour.

    Now the formerly loud Meghan-bashing voices in the British/far-right are keeping as quiet as they can. Not a squeak from most of them, except Pissy Moron, whose credibility is now so shattered that his only option is to keep bleating about how everything is Meghan’s fault.

    One story the media are trying to push is “all the Markles are such trailer trash”. Really? What evidence do they have that Scammy’s daughters from two different relationships Ashleigh Hale and Noelle Rasmussen, and her son Christopher Hale, are trailer trash? Dunno about the son, but the daughters are estranged from Nutjob Scammy and don’t give her the time of day. And clearly the daughters don’t seem batshit, like their mom. Neither daughter was even raised by Scammy.

    Isn’t it the truth that the British media chose to platform the least credible and most deranged Markles, ignoring the more balanced-looking ones, just so they could use them to bash Meghan with?

    Now the media have egg all over their faces they’re trying to make it like all the Markles are crazy. Not so!

    • WaterDragon says:

      Ashleigh Hale and her brother Christopher Hale were adopted and raised by their paternal grandparents, parents of Scammy’s 1st husband. Noelle Rasmussen was from a later marriage of Scammy. Her maternal grandmother Roslyn Loveless rescued her from the clutches of Scammy. Christopher maintains a low profile, but it is clear that Ashleigh and Noelle turned out alright and are not “trailer trash”. I would say that Roslyn Loveless was a true heroine in the Markle family, a woman who was willing to do what was right and who knew the score about her own children.

  12. Lady Digby says:

    Apparently in her laughable memoirs Sammy happily concludes that she now has daddy all to herself as
    She also claims to have sent Meghan the following email: “It must make you writhe in your own envious swill to know that all of your money and all of your manipulation did not win Dad all to yourself.”
    So comforting for Meghan that she never has to see hideous TMarkle ever again but that Sammy and Caroline Graham can fight over him .

  13. paintybox says:

    There’s tacit approval coming from the Windsors re: this years-long rabid campaign to tear down the Duchess of Sussex. Same drill as Diana. These royalists pundits are always speaking for the queen, Charles, William and others, ranting about how Meghan should be banned or run through the gauntlet and we never hear a single word of objection from any of the Windsors. But they’re quick to make statements to dissociate from H & M, whenever that comes up. So – it’s massive nonsense – royals & royalists, they’re all full of sh*t.

  14. ChillinginDC says:

    Every journalist should be hounded about talking to this man and printing his lies and all so they could harass the daughter that cut him off.

  15. pottymouth pup says:

    A lot of information about Thomas Sr and Samantha were quickly well known to the public. I’m sure the media that created an extremely lucrative cottage industry directing hate against Meghan (and, in many cases, continues to twist themselves into pretzels to find fault for her actions in learning about the letter to the The Met) were well aware of how problematic the Markles that they were trotting out to attack Meghan have been. I’m equally sure that many of them were aware of the contents of the letter to The Met as early as 2019 and, since they couldn’t use this knowledge against Meghan because she had distanced herself from the Markles who were engaging in public attacks on her character, decided to continue to engage with Samantha and Thomas and use them as a cudgel against Meghan. To this effect, if a financial audit was ever conducted, I’m pretty sure the British media bankrolled the hate campaign, including paying the MArkles

    • Mayp says:

      “A lot of information about Thomas Sr and Samantha were quickly well known to the public.”. Yes, I am remembering the interview that Thomas Markle Jr gave early on where he implied if not outright stated that his dad was basically a sex tourist to Southeast Asia. I can’t remember if it was the Philippines or Thailand but he said his father would go there and have a woman or women for the weekend and he told Junior that it would: change your life.

      And yet the tabloids were so shocked that Markle Senior acknowledged that he paid women for sex in Southeast Asia. 🤡🤡🤡🙄. It was clear from the get-go that Senior is a perv.

  16. QuiteContrary says:

    Any halfway-decent or semi-skilled journalist would have been able to tell who in that family was credible and who was sketchy.

    But the rota chose to platform Tom Sr. and Scamantha. Says it all.

Commenting Guidelines

Read the article before commenting.

We aim to be a friendly, welcoming site where people can discuss entertainment stories and current events in a lighthearted, safe environment without fear of harassment, excessive negativity, or bullying. Different opinions, backgrounds, ages, and nationalities are welcome here - hatred and bigotry are not. If you make racist or bigoted remarks, comment under multiple names, or wish death on anyone you will be banned. There are no second chances if you violate one of these basic rules.

By commenting you agree to our comment policy and our privacy policy

Do not engage with trolls, contrarians or rude people. Comment "troll" and we will see it.

Please e-mail the moderators at cbcomments at gmail.com to delete a comment if it's offensive or spam. If your comment disappears, it may have been eaten by the spam filter. Please email us to get it retrieved.

You can sign up to get an image next to your name at Gravatar.com Thank you!

Leave a comment after you have read the article

Save my name and email in this browser for the next time I comment