You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

10 Responses to “First critic blasts Sex and The City Movie (movie stills may have spoilers)”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Enonymouse says:

    Well the ironic twist is that most of the movies that get bad reviews are the ones who do really well in the box office so this could be good news for the SATC movie.
    Also, I totally agree with you celebitchy that the London Times should have NOT sent a man and most people who saw the movie said that it was really good.

  2. Jackie says:

    Its not the London Times, its a national paper for the whole of the UK. There are other places in the UK other than London. However I agree what a bunch of dumbasses sending a man in; this was probably stupidity rather than an exercise in being objective

  3. Enonymouse says:

    Plus, if they wanted to sent a man to review the movie then they should have sent my brother because he secretly LOVES SATC :mrgreen: (and no, he is not gay).

  4. paris herpes says:

    SATC is utter mindless crap. I mean for entertainment value I guess it’s ok, but I usually felt like my mind was melting. It’s like watching Entourage, although everything seems to go right for them. SAT less so…which is why many women can relate on an emotional level. But spending $400 on a pair of shoes? I simply can’t!

  5. Sasha says:

    Pay 8 dollars to see another version of something I’ve watched for free for several years? Not this girl.

  6. KDRockstar says:

    I’ve never understood the attraction. Hmm, didn’t the second one from the left win the Kentucky Derby this year?

  7. headache says:

    ph, no one else did either which is why Miranda was more relatable and Samantha was more fun than Carrie. I love Big but I never forgave her for that big mess with Aidan. That man was PERFECTION!

  8. Jaclyn says:

    OMFG, I CAN’T WAIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

  9. kate says:

    why would they send a man to this movie? duh. and i agree with jaclyn:

    OMFG, I CAN”T WAIT EITHER!!

  10. Other Karen says:

    2 hours and 20 minutes is pretty long for a movie these days.

    The women’s reactions may not be useful–presumably the biggest fans (who are the most invested in the film) are the first to see the film. But at least we know it doesn’t tank.