Mark Zuckerberg is Time’s 2010 Man of the Year

timemag

Some people hate the end-of-the-year “best of” lists. Personally, I enjoy them. So while I don’t really give a fig about People’s Best and Worst of the Year issue (Sandra Bullock is “the most intriguing” and Kim Kardashian is on the list). But Time Magazine’s Man/Person of the Year issue is always a must-get for me. And this year’s “winner” is interesting… Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, is the Man of the Year. Why this year, you may ask? I don’t really know. My only explanation is that it’s because of The Social Network and Zuckerberg’s very recent press-friendliness, his raised profile, and because he just gave away the bulk of his fortune. Time Mag’s full package on Zuckerberg is here – there’s an essay, lots of photos, lots of pieces of how Facebook changed the world, etc. Here are the basics:

The guy with more friends than anybody has been named Time magazine’s Person of the Year: Mark Zuckerberg, the controversial, 26-year-old founder of Facebook, the newsweekly announced Wednesday morning.

Winning the honor over such short-listed names as WikiLeak’s Julian Assange (the favorite in a readers’ poll), the Tea Party, the Chilean Miners, Apple’s Steve Jobs and Afghanistan leader Hamid Karzai, Zuckerberg on his own Facebook page describes his personal interests as “openness, making things that help people connect and share what’s important to them, revolutions, information flow, minimalism.”

As Time tagged Zuckerberg’s on the Web site of the Today show – Time editor Rick Stengel made the announcement of Zuckerberg’s selection on the NBC morning program – “More than half a billion people on the planet live in a world created by Mark Zuckerberg. The good news is, their friends all live there too. Zuckerberg founded the social networking site Facebook in his college dorm six years ago, but 2010 was the year that Facebook reached critical mass, both in sheer quantity of users and in its presence (through its ‘connect’ features) all over the Web.”

The profile continued, “Zuckerberg spent much of the year fighting privacy concerns, and this fall he had to shake off a movie that depicted him as an alienated loner, hacking to get girls. But the world’s youngest billionaire has no plans to slow Facebook’s growth, nor does it show any sign of stopping.”

That movie is The Social Network, which, besides doing well at the box office, is an Oscar Best Picture frontrunner. In the past week it’s been honored, too – having been named Best Picture of the Year by the National Board of Review, the New York Film Critics Circle and critics’ groups in Toronto, Boston and Los Angeles. In addition, the movie and its leading man, Jesse Eisenberg, who plays a hard-boiled Zuckerman, received Golden Globe nominations.

Time’s Person of the Year tradition harkens back to 1927, the year the magazine (which, like PEOPLE, is today part of Time Inc.) was launched. The first Person was aviator Charles Lindbergh. Others named throughout the decades have included Franklin D. Roosevelt (1932, 1934 and 1941), Adolf Hitler (1936), the American Fighting Man (1950), the Generation Under 25 (1966), American Women (1975), and, during their terms in office, Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, both Bushes, Clinton and Obama.

[From People]

While I totally think Zuckerberg is a great candidate for Man of the Year, it also feels a bit dated, right? Why not two years ago? Why not four years ago? But still, if this is the face of The New American Entrepreneur, I can’t hate it. He’s young, he’s brilliant, and he’s not as douchey in real life as The Social Network would have you believe. And he’s charitable! Good choice, overall.

SAN FRANCISCO - NOVEMBER 15: Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during a special event announcing a new Facebook email messaging system at the St. Regis Hotel on November 15, 2010 in San Francisco, California. Facebook will launch a new messaging system aimed at enhancing it's social media product to its 500 million users. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

PALO ALTO, CA - NOVEMBER 3: Facebook social network founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg speaks at a press conference at Facebook headquarters on November 3, 2010 in Palo Alto, California. Zuckerberg announced a new mobile Facebook platform that will unify it's mobile site but anxious rumors of a Facebook phone were not confirmed. (Photo by Kim White/Getty Images)

PALO ALTO, CA - NOVEMBER 3: Facebook social network founder and CEO, Mark Zuckerberg speaks at a press conference at Facebook headquarters on November 3, 2010 in Palo Alto, California. Zuckerberg announced a new mobile Facebook platform that will unify it's mobile site but anxious rumors of a Facebook phone were not confirmed. (Photo by Kim White/Getty Images)

SAN FRANCISCO - NOVEMBER 15: Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks during a special event announcing a new Facebook email messaging system at the St. Regis Hotel on November 15, 2010 in San Francisco, California. Facebook will launch a new messaging system aimed at enhancing it's social media product to its 500 million users. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

33 Responses to “Mark Zuckerberg is Time’s 2010 Man of the Year”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. gloaming says:

    I feel like I’m the only person in the world who doesn’t have a Facebook page.

  2. merry says:

    Wow, beautiful eyes!

  3. MeMyself says:

    Fantastic news!
    I wish I had the kind of wealth that I could give millions to the charities and those who I deemed needed it…so jealous!

  4. Kaiser says:

    gloaming – I don’t have one either! I don’t like many people, so I find the whole thing obnoxious.

  5. CandyKay says:

    I love Facebook, and it annoys me when my real-life friends aren’t on it.

    I’ve moved so much, and lived in so many different countries, that it would be unrealistic to write letters and call and email all the people I call friends on a daily or even weekly basis. Facebook is a great way to follow all the small events that make up the daily lives of people I care about.

    That way when I do get together with geographically distant friends after 2-3 years, we don’t have to start with, “Hey, are you still married to Bob? Are you still working at the lawyers’ office? How’s your band coming?” Etc.

    I must admit I’ve grown less close to my real-life friends who aren’t on Facebook, and more close to those who are.

  6. hstl1 says:

    I love that one of his personal interests is minimalism. He is my brother from another mother!

    I don’t have a Facebook page either because even though I love his charitable work, I hate how he has contributed to the erosion of privacy. People actually get mad at me for not having a Facebook page but I only want to be that open and accessible to the people that matter to me.

  7. kiko says:

    the first pic is spooky..

  8. Kaboom says:

    Time running scared from controversy by picking Assange. Lame.

  9. eja102 says:

    I have fb because I like that stupid mafia wars.
    but really, I talk to the poeple I am friends with, I don’t feel the need to fb with them too.
    I do have twitter friends from around the world on it.
    I don’t get the hype to download tons of photos though. I once had a guy I was dating tell me I was totally strange for NOT having pictures and updates all the time. we obviously didn’t date for much longer.

    so, that’s my fb story. thanks for reading.

  10. Reality says:

    I rebelled against joining facebook for ages, not wanting to be a mindless sheep and being quite a private person. But when I finally joined, I got why everyone is on it. It’s so much easier to stay in touch with people in other countries and share photos.

    Now Twitter I don’t understand.

    Anyway I think what Zuckerberg is doing philanthropically is awesome, but I’m a bit creeped out by the cover photo- he looks way too much like a lizard person from V.

    p.s. I agree Kaboom, they should have picked Assange.

  11. anti says:

    i agree with #8 — arrange got more votes and it was a lame move. having assange would probably increase sales of that issue too.

    i also agree with kaiser, even if zuck was really worthy, why this year?

  12. eja102 says:

    see, I like twitter a lot.
    not the celeb shit, I don’t follow anyone but ZQ (so cute!), celeb wise.

    I’ve “met” a lot of people that I wouldn’t ever have had the chance to get to know. FB, seems to be people you already know, twitter, i got a chance to meet a lot of new people.

    The UK girls are fucking hilarious.

  13. Majosha says:

    Totally agree with the posters who think Assange should have been picked.

  14. CandyKay says:

    Assange will be a trivia question a year from now.

  15. fancyamazon says:

    Assange should maybe be the criminal of the year, certainly not the person of the year. People’s lives were put at risk by his leaking of secret documents, illegally obtained. International relations could also have been severely threatened. Secret documents are secret for a reason. Transparency is great for financial records of companies and legislative mechanics, but it doesn’t work so well on an international level where tenuous relationships between countries need to be fostered or watched, and it also doesn’t work when you are dealing with troop movements and numbers and locations.

  16. Samantha says:

    So lame. Assange should have taken it. I hate how they do this crap, he certainly deserves it more than Facebook dude. Lame lame lame.

  17. Franny says:

    i love facebook. seriously. its great. i love sharing pictures and looking at others. i like being able to post links and messages and blah blah blah. I also don’t personally understand the whole “privacy” issues. its not like we give the website our social security numbers or credit card. you can completely hide your profile and only add people instead of people adding you.

    and i’m pretty sure those eyes are ‘shopped.

  18. CandyKay says:

    People get all hysterical if someone can see a picture of them drinking beer on Facebook – “What about my privacy!” – but when it comes to the locations of nuclear weapons, it’s just “information wants to be free.”

    Slate.com suggested that someone should hack and publish all of Assange and Bradley Manning’s personal emails and texts. Information just wants to be free!

  19. fancyamazon says:

    @CandyKay Exactly. You said it better than I did.

  20. munchies says:

    no facebook, myspace, twitter, youtube here in China where Im currently assigned.

    I dont have facebook anyway so I’m alright and many friends are so upset with me. I just dont get it why I need to update my life and pics online.I love checking celebrities daily but not interested in other people.I can spend whole day in celebitchy but not an hour in FB.

    without youtube is killing me on the other hand.

    btw, Mark is generous.

  21. normades says:

    I’m a facebook quiter. I didn’t like the idea that fb can sell my info to third parties. I think fb is kind of evil actually

  22. fizXgirl314 says:

    facebook is great.. I’ve gotten in touch with people I hadn’t talked to in AGES… without that sort of technology, I probably would have just forgotten about them and it’s kind of sad. Also, people invite me to parties on there lol…

  23. craigc says:

    More like Mark Fug-lerberg…

  24. Chris says:

    Assange is easily the person of the year. Zukerberg has hardly rated a mention here in Australia and Assange has been all over the media for ages. Also, I was at the gym the other day and they have a bunch of TVs in the cardio section and a few of them show world news from countries from all over the world and they were all running Assange stories too. There has also been worldwide demonstrations of support for Assange. The man is a phenomenon.

  25. Anna says:

    Am I the only one that LOL’d his face hahaha

  26. truthzbetta says:

    I vote Assange too. Unless he’s actually a rapist. If not, that guy is a true revolutionary in every sense.

    This Time Waster of the Year created a video scrapbook and doodle pad for sharing. BFD, he really, really is not brilliant. Rich doesn’t equal brains, go look at Bangs Bieber if you need proof.

    The traditional news is beyond irrelevant these days, and leaking cred and audience like a sieve. Not surprising they don’t want to share their sources the way all scientists must, and as Assange suggests so you don’t have to “trust” them when they lie so much. Online has surpassed these mags and newspapers in market share because they don’t know things like a million other networks from Youtube to Myspace are equal to Facebook in relevance and connectivity. But someone made a movie about this particular nerd, so He Da Man. Time is Late. It’s Old Time.

    And the PC thing where they call him a “person” is very 1990 Kobain era Clinton year flashback inducing. If they were in the new millennium they’d just change the gender “Man” or “Woman” of the year and pick women roughly as often as men. The whole thing even looks like Mad Magazine so I’ll give a hacker credit for uploading this big, fat cartoonishly fun joke.

  27. B says:

    Admittedly Zuckerberg is a pretty decent choice, but I was hoping that Time wouldn’t wimp out…and they did. Julian Assange should’ve gotten it.

  28. Bitter fruit says:

    Facebook is a fad that will be dead within a few years.

  29. Megatrona says:

    Oh no facebook won’t be dead
    I am a person who has lived in different countries and still live now on a country which is not my birth country, I am one if many, facebbok has given me the chance to keep up with my old friend and family, I am able yo see or hear how they are doing which is great
    If they want to sell my ” information” wethever the he’ll that means, then go for it! I get all the fun for free from them so I don’t care

  30. Cheyenne says:

    @Megatrona: ITA. I reconnected with extended family members and acquaintances on Facebook whom I hadn’t seen or heard from in over 30 years and thought I’d never see/hear from again. Facebook is our means of keeping in touch.

  31. Emily says:

    I refused to get Facebook for ages, and then my then GF set it up for me. I mainly use it for events, as I talk to the people I care about in real life. But it’s awesome for setting up parties. When we were organising our housewarming, we didn’t have the net connected yet, and couldn’t remember how to organise a party without FB.

  32. DetRiotgirl says:

    I also don’t have a facebook page. I remember feeling like facebook was the more elitist version of myspace back in the days when they would only take college students. At the time, I was too broke to be in school. So, I was waiting tables in a college town to make ends meet until I get afford to do something better. Kids from the university would always ask me about my facebook page, and when it would eventually come out that I wasn’t in school, they would look down on me for it. I still remember the look of snobbery I used to associate with facebook users.

    Now everyone can be on Facebook; and it seems like almost everyone is! I too have received the same dirty looks and angry comments that some other posters here have for not having a page. I don’t get it, and I never will.

  33. thanks for this exciting ws sign details I will article a link on our blog so my personal readers can benefit from the idea too.